Written language research

Best Practice in Writing Instruction 1
Best Practice in Writing Instruction K-8
Genny R. Reigstad
A Capstone Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
For the Degree of
MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION:
DIFFERNENTIATED INSTRUCTION EMPHASIS
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
May 2008

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Throughout this master’s program I was faced with several unexpected challenges. I wish
to thank my husband, Jared, for his time and patience. Thank you to Robin Sobczak for
being an angel on earth and caring for my newborn when I couldn’t. Finally, I wish to
thank Aubrey Belle for inspiring me daily. I love you to the moon and back.

Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION………………………...…………………………4
Definition of Terms…………….…………………..…………………………5
Summary…………………………………………..………………………….9
CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF LITERATURE………….……………………….......10
The Writing Process.…………………………………………………………11
Summary……….…………………………………….……………………….17
CHAPTER 3: DIFFERENTIATING WRITING INSTRUCTION…….………......18
Learning Styles.…………………………………………………………........18
Meeting Educational Needs…………………………………………………..20
Writing Across the Curriculum………………………………………………..23
Summary………………………………………..……………………………..23
CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION OF RESULTS…………………..……………………24
Effective Teaching Strategies in Writing Instruction…………………………25
Other Factors Contributing to Effective Writing……………………………..28
Summary………………………………………………………………………31
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY AND REFLECTION…………………………………..33
Summary of Research………………….………………………………………33
Personal Reflection…………………….………………………………………34
References……………………………..……….…………………………….………36
Appendices …………………………………….…………………………………….40
Appendix A ………………………………………………………. ………….40
Appendix B……………………………………………………………………44

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Every day we come into contact with the written word. We see writing
everywhere we go. Written language is one of the most important methods of
communicating, and it has been around since the beginning of documented time. We
acquire knowledge through reading the written word, and we express ourselves to others
through the use of the written word. We learn to write at a young age because of its
importance and usefulness in our lives. Whether it be journaling our innermost thoughts
as a means to release the stressors in our lives, or conveying the world's most intriguing
events through an article in the New York Times, writing is a useful tool for us all.
Writing is a means of expression. It allows us to be individuals while connecting
us to all other humans who are literate. It separates us from all other living creatures and
provides us countless avenues in which to communicate our needs, desires, feelings, and
knowledge. It has been herald as one of the famous "Three R's" - reading, writing, and
arithmetic- in education, even though it starts with a "w". We need written language skills
to be successful in today's world. “It is essential to school success and has increasingly
become a central component of daily life in industrialized societies” (Graham,
MacArthur, & Fitzgerald, 2007).
The United States Department of Education understands the importance of written
language and written language instruction. All public schools are required to teach
writing. Schools do not have the authority to pick and choose who will receive written
language instruction; it is to be provided for all students. Teachers must provide effective,

meaningful written language instruction to all students regardless of a myriad of
differences, including, but not limited to race, culture, linguistic differences, and ability
levels.
Purpose of the Study
There are many different ways of teaching writing. Some instructors choose to
carefully follow writing curriculum guides, while others experiment with their teaching
practices. The purpose of this research paper was to determine the most effective
practices for teaching all students written language skills, so they may effectively
communicate their thoughts through the use of writing.
Definition of Terms
Retrieved from: http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm
Analytic scoring: Method of scoring essay items in which separate scores are given for
specific aspects of the essay ( e.g., organization, factual accuracy, spelling). Retrieved
from: http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm
Application skills: The ability to use reading, mathematics, and other academic skills in
real-life situations. Retrieved from: http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm
Assistive technology: Computers and other technologies used to enhance the performance
of individuals with disabilities. Retrieved from:
http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm

Assessment: A related series of measures used to determine a complex attribute of an
individual or group of individuals. Generally has broader connotations than measurement.
Often used as a stylistic alternative to measurement. Retrieved from:
Curriculum: The skills, performances, attitudes, and values pupils are expected to learn
from schooling: includes statements of desired pupil outcomes, descriptions of materials,
and the planned sequence that will be used to help pupils attain the outcomes. Retrieved
Differentiated Instruction: efforts of teachers to respond to variance among learners in the
classroom...in order to create the best learning experience possible (Tomlinson, 2000).
Educational objective: A statement that describes a pupil's accomplishment that will
result from instruction; the statement describes the behavior the pupil will learn to
perform and the content on which it will be performed. Retrieved from:
English-language Learner: student whose first language is not English and who either
lacks proficiency in English or has beginning level proficiency in English. Retrieved
Expressive language: The production of language for com-munication; for example,
speaking and writing. Retrieved from:

First language: The language learned first by an individual; also called home language or
native language. Retrieved from: http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm
Hypermedia: An extension to hypertext that supports linking graphics, sound, and video
elements in addition to text elements. Retrieved from: http://www.webopedia.com
Individualized Education Program: (IEP) A written educational plan developed for each
school-aged student eligible for special education. Retrieved from:
Language proficiency: The degree to which an individual is skilled in a language; when
students speak languages other than English, proficiency is assessed to determine the
primary language. Retrieved from: http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm
Learning strategies: Methods used by individuals in their interactions with learning tasks.
Retrieved from: http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm
Least restrictive environment: According to PL 94-142, the educational placement for
students with disabilities that is as close to the regular classroom as feasible. Retrieved
Mainstreaming: Integration of students with disabilities physically, academically, and
socially with age peers. Retrieved from:

Mechanics: refers to spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Retrieved from:
Nondiscriminatory assessment: Assessment that does not penalize students for their sex,
native language, race, culture, or disability. Retrieved from:
Portfolio assessment: The analysis of student work samples, self-evaluations, and other
materials assembled in portfolios to document student progress over time. Retrieved
Writing: Expressive written language; includes spelling, handwriting, usage, and
composition. Retrieved from: http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm
Special Education: Specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of students
with disabilities. Retrieved from: http://www.upei.ca/~xliu/measurement/glossary.htm
Summary
Written language skills are a necessity in today's world. Students must learn how
to effectively communicate with others through the use of the written word. This paper
will review the current research in the area of written language instruction to determine
the most effective way to educate elementary through middle school students in this
important academic area.

CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Writing is a part of everyday life. It is a way to communicate, self-reflect, and keep
order in our lives. “One of the most important features of writing is that it lets us
communicate with others, allowing us to maintain personal links with family, friends and
colleagues who are removed by both distance and time” (Graham, McArthur, &
Fitzgerald 2007). It enhances our lives on a daily basis. Kajder (2005) believes that
writing is a tool for thinking. Writing allows us to receive information, process it, and
provide feedback. The purpose for reviewing literature on writing instruction is to further
our knowledge of effective practices that will ultimately improve the success of our
students. Teaching written language skills is therefore an essential part of the educational
experience as well as life experience.
Written language has been taught in school systems since the beginning of
formalized education. Today writing is a key ingredient in learning. Written language
assessment is included on state mandated tests of basic educational needs. Its importance
has been noted repeatedly as evidenced by the existence of libraries, computers, postal
systems, etc. How to deliver writing instruction in the most effective manner has been a
challenge and an arena for debate. This review of literature will examine administration
of writing instruction in mixed ability kindergarten through eighth grade classrooms to
determine the most effective method(s).

The Writing Process
There is a plethora of research on how to deliver written language instruction. The
two methods that appear over and over again in the research are the whole language
approach and the writing process approach. According to Harris and Graham (1996) both
strive to create a community of students who share and help each other, make personal
choices about what they read and write, take ownership and responsibility for their
learning, take risks in their reading and writing, and collaborate in evaluating their efforts
and progress.
Graham and Harris (1996) suggest the fundamental difference between whole
language teachers and those employing the writing process is that process teachers
emphasize ownership of written work and provide ample opportunities for students to
extend their writing experience by offering conferences, peer collaborations, and sharing
of final products.
The writing process has emerged over time. Writing assignments were once handed
out after a certain passage had been read to check for comprehension. Today written
language instruction in the classroom mirrors how a professional writer would do his/her
job. Most professional writers follow several steps before ending with a published piece
of work. These steps used by educators and are now known as the writing process. These
include:

1. planning or brainstorming
2. writing an initial or rough draft
3. revising
4. editing for conventions (mechanical aspects of writing)
5. producing and publishing of a final copy
Step One: Planning
Good writing takes time. It is a mental exercise. According to Young (1997), writing
requires a warm-up session, much like any other exercise. “Your mind needs to warm up
in order for you to write well” (Young, 1997). Other researchers agree. Graham,
MacArthur, and Fitzgerald (2007) suggest, “Effective classrooms always have some form
of planning.” Planning is less common, however, in the primary grades than in the middle
school and high school grades. Many students refer to planning as the brainstorming
stage. This is just another way of saying before writing begins, thoughts need to be put on
paper and organized. Many teachers use graphic organizers to assist students, especially
those with special needs, with planning their writing.
Step Two: Producing
This step consists of producing a written piece often referred to as a “sloppy copy.”
The idea is get ones organized thoughts onto paper. There is little to no regard for correct

mechanical application, spelling, or grammar. These copies are used to reflect on and
share with the teacher and classmate(s) who may offer suggestions for editing.
Step Three: Revising
Revising may also be called proofreading. This step involves making changes to the
placement of thoughts or structure of the writing piece. Here students may want to add or
delete information.
Step Four: Editing for Conventions
Conventions are the mechanics of writing. This step involves checking spelling,
punctuation, capitalization, grammar, and paragraphing. Conventions enhance the
readability of the paper. Spelling should be correct on all words. Punctuation should be
smooth and guide the reader through the paper. Capitalization should be used correctly.
Paragraphing should reinforce organization or flow of the paper/written piece.
Step Five: Production of the Final Copy and Publishing or Sharing Your Work
Once the student has written, revised, and edited their writing piece they can then
work on production of the final copy. Many teachers allow their students to use
computers to publish their written work. “Computers allow students to perfect their
writing thorough multiple revisions while also giving them the means to produce
impressive publications in different media” (Burke, 2003). No matter the media chosen,
Calkins (1994) suggests, “We cannot teach writing well unless we trust that there are real,

human reasons to write.” Writing is a communicating act; and therefore, should be
shared.
In addition to process writing, Graves (1994) defines seven key points or conditions
inherent for effective writing:
1. Room structure. Graves suggests making the classroom “predictable for
productive work.” This would include, but is not limited to ample work space,
available resources, such as sample writing pieces and literature on various subject
matter, as well as maintaining a quiet working environment to assist concentration
and minimize distraction.
2. Time. Teaching writing requires time. Writing should be taught daily with an
allotted amount of time dedicated to nothing but writing.
3. Choice. When students make their own choices about their written work, they
feel a sense of ownership which assists them in committing to producing good
work.
4. Demonstration. “The teacher is the most important factor in creating a learning
environment in the classroom….When you actually take your own text and put it
on the chalkboard, an overhead projector, or chart paper, and show your students
how to read it, they will receive the clearest demonstration of what writing is
about” (p. 109). Demonstration can also be thought of as the passion, curiosity,
and problem solving we as educators show our students throughout the day.

5. Response. “Students need to hear the responses of others to their writing, to
discover what they do or do not understand” (p. 108).
6. Expectation. It is important to maintain high and reasonable expectations for
your students. Graves asks, “What are you working at to be a better writer?”
(p. 110).
7. Evaluation. Evaluation should include the final written piece and also the big
picture of progressing as a writer.
“Graves (1994) derived these seven parts to clarify the enacting of the process
oriented writing curriculum in his Writing Workshop curriculum model” (Graves, as sited
in Mott & Klomes, 2001). Using these seven steps along with the writing process
approach will benefit teachers and assist students in achievement of grade-level writing
demands.
Mixed Ability Classrooms
With so much research available to assist teachers with creating an effective writing
curriculum, why is there a need for more? As stated previously, most research has been
conducted using whole language or process writing, with little focus on strategies that
may be used to reach all students of varying ability levels. Learning effective strategies to
use within writing lessons can prove to be quite beneficial for the teacher and student,
especially when working with students who have special needs.

Delivering of effective writing instruction to an entire class of mixed ability students
requires follow up teaching with small groups and/or individual students. Research
suggests the best method for reaching all students including bilingual students and those
with special needs is by proving a setting that is engaging. Graham, MacArthur, &
Fitzgerald (2007) found this to be the most salient characteristic found in educational
settings which produced the highest language arts achievement. Rather than focusing on
work book page after work book page, students should be actively involved with their
learning.
The second most effective characteristic is direct teaching. Teaching whole class
lessons followed by small group instruction and one on one support where necessary
produced the highest level of literacy achievement (Graham, MacArthur, & Fitzgerald,
2007). Finding a point where students understand their assignment well enough to work
as independently as possible is a common goal for educators. Teaching and re-teaching as
necessary allows those who understand the task to keep going and those who are
struggling to gain a clearer perspective. “Students with learning disabilities and English
language learners benefit from such an approach (the writing process approach) since
they often need a guiding hand and time to concentrate on one aspect of their writing at a
time” (Burke, 2003).
Strategies for Self-Regulation
Self-regulation is a set of four basic abilities (goal setting, self-monitoring, self-
reinforcement, and self-instruction) developed by researchers Graham and Harris (1996).

The major objectives of the self-regulated strategy development approach are as follows:
To assist students in mastering the higher level cognitive processes involved in the
planning, production, revising, and editing of written language, to help students further
develop the capacity to monitor and manage their own writing, and to aid students in the
development of positive attitudes about writing and themselves as writers.
Teaching self-regulation strategies has been shown to help students with special
needs, ELL students, and general education students alike. By increasing positive
attitudes, students are more excited about their learning. “The self-confidence they
developed from their writing spread to other areas of the curriculum, enabling them to be
become more fully involved in class activities” (Five, 1992). When students learn to
monitor and manage their own writing, teachers can place themselves in the role of
facilitator allowing students to feel an increased sense of ownership of their written work.
Summary
According to the research available, the most effective method for delivering written
language instruction in the elementary and middle school classroom is by using the
writing process. Lessons in grammar, conventions, and various genres should precede
independent work. There should be a set time, preferably daily, for students to focus on
their writing. Students should not call it quits after submitting a first draft, but rather
revisit their written work time and again to expand their thinking and understanding. Mott
& Klomes (2001) agree, and add that written language should be experimental in nature.
Students should be given several unique ways to learn and test their abilities. Therefore,

differentiated instruction methods in writing should be examined for effectiveness and
implemented in written language lessons.
In addition to employing the writing process, teachers should follow the seven
steps suggested by Graves (1994) to assure the environment is conducive to learning.
Instructor demonstration and modeling is key to setting the stage for the learner.
Modeling such strategies as self-regulation will help support students attempts. Self-
regulation strategies (goal setting, self-monitoring, self-reinforcement and self-
instructions) have been shown to assist the writer in working toward the goal of
producing a quality written language piece. Teaching these strategies can be a useful tool
for students of all ability levels. Maybe the most useful of these is an increase self-
confidence which arises from finding success with their writing.

CHAPTER THREE: DIFFERENTIATING WRITING INSTRUCTION
Overview
This chapter will focus on differentiating instruction in the area of written language. Having
competence in written language skills is necessary to become a competitive student/member of
society who is able to achieve higher levels of education and furthermore, secure a position in an
affluent career. Written language is a part of everyday life, and therefore deserves the attention of
researchers and educators in an effort to better the way instruction is delivered (Burke, 2003;
Culham, 2003; Culkins, 1986). Pinnell (1999) says it best when she writes, “Effective literacy
programs involve a wide range of reading and writing activities.” The process used to write this
paper was to read and synthesize several research articles relating to writing instruction in an attempt
to gain more knowledge and expertise to further enhance this researcher's teaching ability and to
inform the best practice of this researcher in making a positive difference in the student's writing
ability.
The following pages examine different methods of delivering writing instruction in an attempt
to supply the best educational experience possible in writing for all students. Successful strategies
will be examined and reported. Challenges faced by the instructor and students will also be
examined and reported.
Learning Styles
Tomlinson (2000) defines the differentiated instruction method of teaching as “…efforts of
teachers to respond to variance among learners in the classroom...in order to create the best learning
experience possible.” To accomplish this, a teacher must first get to know each student as an
individual, having among other characteristics, their own interests, learning styles, talents, and self-
concepts. Tomlinson (2000) suggests that students are more successful when teachers teach to their
interests, learning profiles, and readiness levels.

Written language research

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Written language research

More from Fauzi Din

Recently uploaded

Written language research