"How To Lie With Statistics" Chapter 10bookerenc1101
The document discusses things to watch out for when presented with conclusions from studies and data. It warns about potential bias if a presenter only focuses on favorable data and omits unfavorable information. It also notes that conclusions are dependent on who writes and presents the findings, and the sample size may not be large enough to support reliable conclusions. People should ask what information may be missing or omitted from what is presented.
The document discusses how failure can be an advantage and learning opportunity if approached scientifically. It argues that most significant discoveries are the result of experimentation and learning from repeated failures, rather than accidents. It advocates exploring a wide range of alternatives and testing ideas through "prototype" experiments to learn from failures quickly before large investments are made. Creating a culture where failure is accepted as part of the learning process can help organizations and individuals succeed.
Reproducibility, open access, open scienceAlex Holcombe
This document discusses issues with reproducibility and open access in scientific research. It notes studies showing that over 50% of published studies cannot be repeated, and major pharmaceutical companies could only validate around 25% of preclinical studies. It argues that the current publishing system, dominated by for-profit publishers, boxes in academic knowledge and prioritizes profits over open access. The document advocates for cultural and technological changes like open access policies, altmetrics, and software for reproducible research to help make science more open.
Cognibrain is changing your medical manuscript writing and research paper publication process. Our mission is to provide medical manuscript writing service to clinical research companies, doctor, medical and scientific researchers. Our team of medical writers and experts focuses on combining autonomous and imperative thinking on various medical subjects.
Fixing Science: The Replicability CrisisAlex Holcombe
This document discusses the replicability crisis in science. It notes that while textbooks teach the importance of replicating experiments, few published studies actually report replications. This allows for biases like p-hacking and publication bias to inflate false positive rates. Reasons for the replicability crisis include errors, fraud, biases in what researchers and journals choose to publish, and exploiting flexibility in analysis. Solutions proposed include conducting and publishing more replication studies, pre-registering study designs, and making data and analyses more open through initiatives like registered replication reports and open science.
The scientific method involves identifying a problem, researching the topic, developing a testable hypothesis, conducting controlled experiments to collect data, analyzing the results, and drawing a conclusion. The steps include:
1) Identifying a problem and research question.
2) Researching previous work on the topic from various sources.
3) Developing an educated hypothesis with an expected measurable outcome.
4) Conducting multiple controlled experiments to test the hypothesis and record observations and data.
The document provides guidance on how to write the methods section of a scientific paper, including key elements that should be included such as study design, participants, interventions, outcomes, statistical analysis, and ethical approval. It emphasizes that the methods section should provide enough detail for other researchers to reproduce the study. It also offers tips for writing clearly and concisely such as using active voice and short sentences.
- Formulating the right research question is crucial to a successful research project. A good research question should be feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant.
- The FINER criteria evaluates research questions based on these characteristics. A well-formulated research question helps ensure the research enjoys studying the topic and has a high chance of a good outcome.
- Developing a research question involves identifying an area of interest, narrowing it into subareas, selecting the most interesting subarea, and then raising potential research questions to evaluate using criteria like FINER. The goal is to have a question specific enough to answer but also general enough to study.
"How To Lie With Statistics" Chapter 10bookerenc1101
The document discusses things to watch out for when presented with conclusions from studies and data. It warns about potential bias if a presenter only focuses on favorable data and omits unfavorable information. It also notes that conclusions are dependent on who writes and presents the findings, and the sample size may not be large enough to support reliable conclusions. People should ask what information may be missing or omitted from what is presented.
The document discusses how failure can be an advantage and learning opportunity if approached scientifically. It argues that most significant discoveries are the result of experimentation and learning from repeated failures, rather than accidents. It advocates exploring a wide range of alternatives and testing ideas through "prototype" experiments to learn from failures quickly before large investments are made. Creating a culture where failure is accepted as part of the learning process can help organizations and individuals succeed.
Reproducibility, open access, open scienceAlex Holcombe
This document discusses issues with reproducibility and open access in scientific research. It notes studies showing that over 50% of published studies cannot be repeated, and major pharmaceutical companies could only validate around 25% of preclinical studies. It argues that the current publishing system, dominated by for-profit publishers, boxes in academic knowledge and prioritizes profits over open access. The document advocates for cultural and technological changes like open access policies, altmetrics, and software for reproducible research to help make science more open.
Cognibrain is changing your medical manuscript writing and research paper publication process. Our mission is to provide medical manuscript writing service to clinical research companies, doctor, medical and scientific researchers. Our team of medical writers and experts focuses on combining autonomous and imperative thinking on various medical subjects.
Fixing Science: The Replicability CrisisAlex Holcombe
This document discusses the replicability crisis in science. It notes that while textbooks teach the importance of replicating experiments, few published studies actually report replications. This allows for biases like p-hacking and publication bias to inflate false positive rates. Reasons for the replicability crisis include errors, fraud, biases in what researchers and journals choose to publish, and exploiting flexibility in analysis. Solutions proposed include conducting and publishing more replication studies, pre-registering study designs, and making data and analyses more open through initiatives like registered replication reports and open science.
The scientific method involves identifying a problem, researching the topic, developing a testable hypothesis, conducting controlled experiments to collect data, analyzing the results, and drawing a conclusion. The steps include:
1) Identifying a problem and research question.
2) Researching previous work on the topic from various sources.
3) Developing an educated hypothesis with an expected measurable outcome.
4) Conducting multiple controlled experiments to test the hypothesis and record observations and data.
The document provides guidance on how to write the methods section of a scientific paper, including key elements that should be included such as study design, participants, interventions, outcomes, statistical analysis, and ethical approval. It emphasizes that the methods section should provide enough detail for other researchers to reproduce the study. It also offers tips for writing clearly and concisely such as using active voice and short sentences.
- Formulating the right research question is crucial to a successful research project. A good research question should be feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant.
- The FINER criteria evaluates research questions based on these characteristics. A well-formulated research question helps ensure the research enjoys studying the topic and has a high chance of a good outcome.
- Developing a research question involves identifying an area of interest, narrowing it into subareas, selecting the most interesting subarea, and then raising potential research questions to evaluate using criteria like FINER. The goal is to have a question specific enough to answer but also general enough to study.
Covering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It WrongIvan Oransky
This document provides guidance on how to accurately summarize and report on medical studies to avoid misrepresenting results. It emphasizes the importance of reading full studies, asking clarifying questions of authors, considering limitations and biases, disclosing conflicts of interest, and relying on outside experts rather than just study authors when evaluating results. The goal is to help readers make informed health decisions by providing coverage that reflects the evidence objectively and acknowledges uncertainty.
Public health writing - Creo Zenith HealthCreo Zenith
Public health writing is unique. In no other field do authors often deal with a complex range of factors that include
age, gender,education,economics, race, sex, Culture, medicine, enetics, individual behavior,family, community, social justice.
Stake Holders :-
Researchers
Practitioners
Health providers
Administrators
Policy-makers
Journalists
Educators
Communities
Clear and effective communication is therefore a key component of public health leadership
This document provides guidance on publishing research. It discusses why researchers should publish their work, including to update the scientific community and further their careers. It covers how to structure manuscripts, including following the IMRAD format of Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The submission and peer review processes are described. Reviewers may request revisions, so researchers should respond politely and address all feedback. Overall, the document aims to help researchers successfully publish their work.
Why facts do not change people - TEDx Warwick 2015Scott McArthur
In this annotated version of my TEDx talk I consider why we often seem to ignore facts whilst being perfectly happy to believe nonsense? We can learn from our opponents and I present a few lessons from both sides that I hope will help people change...oh and there's a little tribute to Spock who sadly died just before our event took place
This is the presentation I made to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Research in the Media workshop for Latin American journalists in Guadalajara on November 8, 2011. It is step-by-step advice about things to consider about each of the 10 criteria we apply to the review of health care news stories about treatments, tests, products & procedures.
ThesisWhy you chose this topicDoes it pertain to your field.docxrandymartin91030
Thesis
Why you chose this topic?
Does it pertain to your field of study?
Heading left right – Single Spaced
Name
Date
Class
Assignment
Professor Kazanjian
Double Space
Times New Roman; 12 pt Font; 1 inch Margins
2 – 3 Pages. Less than 2 pages or more than 3 pages will receive ZERO Credit
Informative Essay -
Research Paper Proposal
Informative Essay
Include information to educate the reader about the topic you wish to write a research paper on;
“Why should people care?”
Create a sound thesis statement;
Reasons why the topic is important;
You should have an introduction, body, and a sound conclusion;
Define any agencies or terms that are pertinent to your topic.
Assisted Suicide
Autism
2nd Amendment/ Gun Rights
Legalization of Marijuana
Death Penalty
Same Sex Marriage
U.S. Prison Rates
Animal Rights / Testing
Vegans/Vegetarianism
Mental Illness / PTSD
Abortion
Climate Change
Things NOT to Write on
Expository Writing
Research Paper
A research paper is an analytical or persuasive essay that presents and argues a thesis (evaluates a position)
What a research paper is not
A simple collection of facts on a topic
A summary of information from one or more sources
Research Paper:
From an Interest to a Topic
In choosing a topic start with what interests you most deeply
Start by listing two or three interests you might like to explore/questions that you have wondered about
Examples
If you are undertaking a research project in a specific field, skim a recent textbook, talk to other students, or consult one of your teachers
Examples
You might try to identify an interest based on work you are doing or will do in a different course
Types of topics to avoid
If you are still stuck you can find help on the internet or in your library
Standard Guides in Various Fields
Dictionaries: briefly define concepts and sometimes offer a bibliography
Encyclopedias: give more extensive overviews and usually a bibliography
Bibliographies and Indexes list past and current publications in the field
Finding dictionaries, encyclopedias, and bibliographies in particular fields:
Go to Pfau Library Home Page
Under Search For heading click on the Encyclopedias/Dictionaries link
Under Search Online Databases heading select bibliographies and type your discipline into the search bar.
Scan headings for topics that catch your interest
Once you identify a general area of interest, use the internet to find out more about the topic so that you can narrow it.
At first you may not know enough about a general interest to turn it into a focused topic.
If so, you have to do some reading to know what to think about it.
Don’t read randomly: start with entries in a general encyclopedia, then look at entries in a specialized encyclopedia or dictionary, then browse through journals and websites until you have a grip on the general shape of your topic.
Previous Topics
Gender Discrimination and China’s One Child Policy
The Role of Attachmen.
Evidence and Science Based Medicine A Primer.pptxKaushik Banerjee
This document discusses evidence-based medicine and different types of medical evidence and study designs. It begins by defining evidence-based medicine as applying the best available evidence from clinical research to medical decision making. It then discusses different types of medical studies and evidence, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and qualitative research. It emphasizes that not all medical evidence is equal and that higher quality evidence comes from studies with rigorous designs like randomized controlled trials that minimize bias. The document stresses the importance of critically appraising medical evidence to assess its validity, clinical importance, and applicability to a specific patient.
The document discusses how patient advocacy groups can avoid being used to further other organizations' agendas. It provides examples of how groups are sometimes asked to endorse projects or collaborate in ways that do not truly prioritize patient input or perspectives. The document suggests patient groups have principles, policies and procedures in place to guide discussions and consider transparency. It also proposes the idea of advocacy groups rating clinical trial protocols or requiring meaningful discussions about patient priorities in exchange for data or other requests. Overall, the document advises patient groups to negotiate from a position of power by earning the right to authentically represent their communities.
This document discusses different dimensions for characterizing research projects, including topic, novelty, technology, scope, mode, methods, ideology, politics, and utility. It provides examples of different types of projects that fall under each dimension, such as observational vs. interventionist studies. The document emphasizes that research projects can be understood as existing in a multidimensional space defined by these dimensions, and that considering all relevant dimensions is important for designing and conducting a high-quality project.
The document provides guidance on developing a strong thesis statement, including that it should be:
1) Debatable and propose an arguable point that people could reasonably disagree on.
2) Narrow in scope so the topic can be adequately covered.
3) Clearly state your own conclusion and point of view on the topic based on evidence.
It also provides examples of effective thesis statements that follow these guidelines on topics like stem cell research, prescription drug use in children, and castration as punishment for sex offenders.
The document discusses how to write an effective thesis statement. It states that a thesis should make a specific central point about the topic in one or two sentences. It provides examples of strong and weak thesis statements. The document then lists 9 qualities of an effective thesis, such as stating the topic and central point clearly, limiting the thesis to one topic and point, avoiding broad statements, and expressing the central point in specific words without announcements or opinions. It concludes by advising the reader to review their thesis to ensure it is clear and supported.
The document provides instructions for writing a persuasive essay, including defining what a persuasive essay is, its purpose, and common topics. It recommends choosing a clear position, doing research to support the position with facts and examples, and having a plan before writing that includes an introduction with a thesis statement, body paragraphs supporting the argument, addressing an opposing viewpoint, and a conclusion. The document also provides examples of opening techniques, creating a thesis statement, outlining supporting paragraphs, discussing the opposing point of view, and concluding.
This document provides guidance on developing a good research question for an essay. It explains the three types of essays - problem-focused, solution-focused, and 50/50 - and how to determine which type is appropriate based on whether the problem or solution is more controversial. It provides examples of good research questions that are thought-provoking and can't be answered with a single fact, as well as examples of questions that are too broad or practical. The document instructs students to rewrite their main research question and provide an initial "hypothesis" or thesis to answer it.
The document provides instructions for writing a persuasive essay, including establishing a clear position, supporting arguments with evidence from research, addressing counterarguments, and following a specific essay structure. It emphasizes that a persuasive essay aims to convince readers of a belief or position through well-reasoned arguments. Key elements include a thesis statement introducing the main argument, dedicated paragraphs expanding on each supporting point, and a conclusion summarizing the overall position.
Writing - Claims & Evidences (Argumentative Paper Part 1)Shin Chan
This document discusses how to write an argumentative paper by using claims and evidence. It defines a claim as a statement that takes a position and can be debated. There are four types of claims: claims of fact, value, cause and effect, and policy. Evidence is then used to support the claim. Six types of evidence are described: print/electronic sources, observation, interviews, surveys, experiments, and personal experience. The document provides examples and guidelines for incorporating high-quality claims and evidence into an argumentative paper.
This document provides guidance for students completing a research paper and presentation project. It specifies that the paper should be 6-8 pages with a works cited page, and the presentation should be 5-10 minutes. The goal is for students to research a topic of their choice and write and present on their findings. Suggested topics span various subject areas. The document provides advice on choosing a topic, developing an essential question about the topic, and constructing a thesis statement to answer the essential question.
4 major threats to reproducibility are publication bias, low power, p-hacking and HARKing. In this talk I explain these terms and show how study pre-registration can fix them
This document provides instructions for writing a philosophy paper on a health care ethics case. It discusses key things to include in the paper such as clearly stating your position, supporting it with arguments from readings and class discussion, and anticipating objections. It also provides comparison questions and notes on specific cases involving withdrawing life support, informed consent, medical experimentation, and patient confidentiality. Students are asked to pick a case and argue either for or against the actions taken from an ethical perspective.
Question 1 Evaluate a mode of study that you do well and one.docxIRESH3
Question 1
Evaluate a mode of study that you do well and one that you could improve on. Please explain
how you plan on improving that which you find to be weak in your own study habits.
Your response should be at least 75 words in length. You are required to use at least the attached
textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be
referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 2
Describe the two ways that students normally study in a typical college course.
Your response should be at least 75 words in length. You are required to use at least the attached
textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be
referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 3
Describe the typical design of a college course and the outcomes that result for students in these
courses. In addition, describe a situation in which you found yourself falling into this style of
learning.
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least the
attached textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook,
must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Display competence in the art of analyzing the logic of the subject one is studying.
2. Determine the purpose of analyzing the logic of the subject one is studying.
3. Compare and contrast the logic of college as it is and as it should be.
4. Assess the logic of the four modalities of communication.
5. Appraise the criteria for evaluating an author's reasoning by using the elements of thought.
6. Identify how one should assess one's progress in learning.
7. Describe the strategies for self-assessment.
8. Apply the generic model to various applied majors
Unit Lesson
This lecture continues with the discussion of rhetorical devices.
Downplayers
A downplayer is a word that is inserted in a sentence that undermines something that is being discussed. Let’s take a look at two
sentences that mean the same thing in their deepest structure, but that have radically different connotations due to one word.
“Brent got a B on his exam.”
“Brent only got a B on his exam.”
By inserting the word “only,” the person saying sentence two has downplayed Brent’s achievement. Most people would be
happy, or at least satisfied, with a grade of B on an exam. However, the second sentence seems to diminish Brent’s
accomplishment by indicating that a grade of B on the exam does not meet his or her expectations of Brent. You can think of
downplayers as using scare quotes “” in verbal language. Let’s look at some more examples.
“Yeah, Ellen just got her ‘degree’,”
In this case, the person seems to indicate ...
Appendix D provides an illustration and exemplification of the transferable, content, and stylistic skills that the author has acquired through education and experiences, as well as articulating the values that are most important to the author based on assessments in Appendices B-C. Personality is described as a pattern of values, attitudes, and behaviors that represent distinctive ways of thinking and acting, with Appendices B-C providing insight into the author's inner and social personality. Appendix A documents interests through a Strong Interest Inventory assessment.
How to structure a paragraph to develop a central claim. Make your paragraph cohesive and coherent. Use transition language to link ideas. Use a topic and concluding sentence to frame the paragraph.
The document provides guidance on writing effective introductions for academic papers. It recommends that introductions should:
1) Give context about the topic being discussed and sources used; introduce sources and define key terms and concepts.
2) Explain the topic's significance and your own contribution to the discussion.
3) Set up the structure of the paper by outlining the main points in the order they will be addressed.
The introduction should catch the reader up and prepare them to engage with the topic being debated in a way that reflects the overall content and argument of the paper.
Covering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It WrongIvan Oransky
This document provides guidance on how to accurately summarize and report on medical studies to avoid misrepresenting results. It emphasizes the importance of reading full studies, asking clarifying questions of authors, considering limitations and biases, disclosing conflicts of interest, and relying on outside experts rather than just study authors when evaluating results. The goal is to help readers make informed health decisions by providing coverage that reflects the evidence objectively and acknowledges uncertainty.
Public health writing - Creo Zenith HealthCreo Zenith
Public health writing is unique. In no other field do authors often deal with a complex range of factors that include
age, gender,education,economics, race, sex, Culture, medicine, enetics, individual behavior,family, community, social justice.
Stake Holders :-
Researchers
Practitioners
Health providers
Administrators
Policy-makers
Journalists
Educators
Communities
Clear and effective communication is therefore a key component of public health leadership
This document provides guidance on publishing research. It discusses why researchers should publish their work, including to update the scientific community and further their careers. It covers how to structure manuscripts, including following the IMRAD format of Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The submission and peer review processes are described. Reviewers may request revisions, so researchers should respond politely and address all feedback. Overall, the document aims to help researchers successfully publish their work.
Why facts do not change people - TEDx Warwick 2015Scott McArthur
In this annotated version of my TEDx talk I consider why we often seem to ignore facts whilst being perfectly happy to believe nonsense? We can learn from our opponents and I present a few lessons from both sides that I hope will help people change...oh and there's a little tribute to Spock who sadly died just before our event took place
This is the presentation I made to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Research in the Media workshop for Latin American journalists in Guadalajara on November 8, 2011. It is step-by-step advice about things to consider about each of the 10 criteria we apply to the review of health care news stories about treatments, tests, products & procedures.
ThesisWhy you chose this topicDoes it pertain to your field.docxrandymartin91030
Thesis
Why you chose this topic?
Does it pertain to your field of study?
Heading left right – Single Spaced
Name
Date
Class
Assignment
Professor Kazanjian
Double Space
Times New Roman; 12 pt Font; 1 inch Margins
2 – 3 Pages. Less than 2 pages or more than 3 pages will receive ZERO Credit
Informative Essay -
Research Paper Proposal
Informative Essay
Include information to educate the reader about the topic you wish to write a research paper on;
“Why should people care?”
Create a sound thesis statement;
Reasons why the topic is important;
You should have an introduction, body, and a sound conclusion;
Define any agencies or terms that are pertinent to your topic.
Assisted Suicide
Autism
2nd Amendment/ Gun Rights
Legalization of Marijuana
Death Penalty
Same Sex Marriage
U.S. Prison Rates
Animal Rights / Testing
Vegans/Vegetarianism
Mental Illness / PTSD
Abortion
Climate Change
Things NOT to Write on
Expository Writing
Research Paper
A research paper is an analytical or persuasive essay that presents and argues a thesis (evaluates a position)
What a research paper is not
A simple collection of facts on a topic
A summary of information from one or more sources
Research Paper:
From an Interest to a Topic
In choosing a topic start with what interests you most deeply
Start by listing two or three interests you might like to explore/questions that you have wondered about
Examples
If you are undertaking a research project in a specific field, skim a recent textbook, talk to other students, or consult one of your teachers
Examples
You might try to identify an interest based on work you are doing or will do in a different course
Types of topics to avoid
If you are still stuck you can find help on the internet or in your library
Standard Guides in Various Fields
Dictionaries: briefly define concepts and sometimes offer a bibliography
Encyclopedias: give more extensive overviews and usually a bibliography
Bibliographies and Indexes list past and current publications in the field
Finding dictionaries, encyclopedias, and bibliographies in particular fields:
Go to Pfau Library Home Page
Under Search For heading click on the Encyclopedias/Dictionaries link
Under Search Online Databases heading select bibliographies and type your discipline into the search bar.
Scan headings for topics that catch your interest
Once you identify a general area of interest, use the internet to find out more about the topic so that you can narrow it.
At first you may not know enough about a general interest to turn it into a focused topic.
If so, you have to do some reading to know what to think about it.
Don’t read randomly: start with entries in a general encyclopedia, then look at entries in a specialized encyclopedia or dictionary, then browse through journals and websites until you have a grip on the general shape of your topic.
Previous Topics
Gender Discrimination and China’s One Child Policy
The Role of Attachmen.
Evidence and Science Based Medicine A Primer.pptxKaushik Banerjee
This document discusses evidence-based medicine and different types of medical evidence and study designs. It begins by defining evidence-based medicine as applying the best available evidence from clinical research to medical decision making. It then discusses different types of medical studies and evidence, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and qualitative research. It emphasizes that not all medical evidence is equal and that higher quality evidence comes from studies with rigorous designs like randomized controlled trials that minimize bias. The document stresses the importance of critically appraising medical evidence to assess its validity, clinical importance, and applicability to a specific patient.
The document discusses how patient advocacy groups can avoid being used to further other organizations' agendas. It provides examples of how groups are sometimes asked to endorse projects or collaborate in ways that do not truly prioritize patient input or perspectives. The document suggests patient groups have principles, policies and procedures in place to guide discussions and consider transparency. It also proposes the idea of advocacy groups rating clinical trial protocols or requiring meaningful discussions about patient priorities in exchange for data or other requests. Overall, the document advises patient groups to negotiate from a position of power by earning the right to authentically represent their communities.
This document discusses different dimensions for characterizing research projects, including topic, novelty, technology, scope, mode, methods, ideology, politics, and utility. It provides examples of different types of projects that fall under each dimension, such as observational vs. interventionist studies. The document emphasizes that research projects can be understood as existing in a multidimensional space defined by these dimensions, and that considering all relevant dimensions is important for designing and conducting a high-quality project.
The document provides guidance on developing a strong thesis statement, including that it should be:
1) Debatable and propose an arguable point that people could reasonably disagree on.
2) Narrow in scope so the topic can be adequately covered.
3) Clearly state your own conclusion and point of view on the topic based on evidence.
It also provides examples of effective thesis statements that follow these guidelines on topics like stem cell research, prescription drug use in children, and castration as punishment for sex offenders.
The document discusses how to write an effective thesis statement. It states that a thesis should make a specific central point about the topic in one or two sentences. It provides examples of strong and weak thesis statements. The document then lists 9 qualities of an effective thesis, such as stating the topic and central point clearly, limiting the thesis to one topic and point, avoiding broad statements, and expressing the central point in specific words without announcements or opinions. It concludes by advising the reader to review their thesis to ensure it is clear and supported.
The document provides instructions for writing a persuasive essay, including defining what a persuasive essay is, its purpose, and common topics. It recommends choosing a clear position, doing research to support the position with facts and examples, and having a plan before writing that includes an introduction with a thesis statement, body paragraphs supporting the argument, addressing an opposing viewpoint, and a conclusion. The document also provides examples of opening techniques, creating a thesis statement, outlining supporting paragraphs, discussing the opposing point of view, and concluding.
This document provides guidance on developing a good research question for an essay. It explains the three types of essays - problem-focused, solution-focused, and 50/50 - and how to determine which type is appropriate based on whether the problem or solution is more controversial. It provides examples of good research questions that are thought-provoking and can't be answered with a single fact, as well as examples of questions that are too broad or practical. The document instructs students to rewrite their main research question and provide an initial "hypothesis" or thesis to answer it.
The document provides instructions for writing a persuasive essay, including establishing a clear position, supporting arguments with evidence from research, addressing counterarguments, and following a specific essay structure. It emphasizes that a persuasive essay aims to convince readers of a belief or position through well-reasoned arguments. Key elements include a thesis statement introducing the main argument, dedicated paragraphs expanding on each supporting point, and a conclusion summarizing the overall position.
Writing - Claims & Evidences (Argumentative Paper Part 1)Shin Chan
This document discusses how to write an argumentative paper by using claims and evidence. It defines a claim as a statement that takes a position and can be debated. There are four types of claims: claims of fact, value, cause and effect, and policy. Evidence is then used to support the claim. Six types of evidence are described: print/electronic sources, observation, interviews, surveys, experiments, and personal experience. The document provides examples and guidelines for incorporating high-quality claims and evidence into an argumentative paper.
This document provides guidance for students completing a research paper and presentation project. It specifies that the paper should be 6-8 pages with a works cited page, and the presentation should be 5-10 minutes. The goal is for students to research a topic of their choice and write and present on their findings. Suggested topics span various subject areas. The document provides advice on choosing a topic, developing an essential question about the topic, and constructing a thesis statement to answer the essential question.
4 major threats to reproducibility are publication bias, low power, p-hacking and HARKing. In this talk I explain these terms and show how study pre-registration can fix them
This document provides instructions for writing a philosophy paper on a health care ethics case. It discusses key things to include in the paper such as clearly stating your position, supporting it with arguments from readings and class discussion, and anticipating objections. It also provides comparison questions and notes on specific cases involving withdrawing life support, informed consent, medical experimentation, and patient confidentiality. Students are asked to pick a case and argue either for or against the actions taken from an ethical perspective.
Question 1 Evaluate a mode of study that you do well and one.docxIRESH3
Question 1
Evaluate a mode of study that you do well and one that you could improve on. Please explain
how you plan on improving that which you find to be weak in your own study habits.
Your response should be at least 75 words in length. You are required to use at least the attached
textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be
referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 2
Describe the two ways that students normally study in a typical college course.
Your response should be at least 75 words in length. You are required to use at least the attached
textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be
referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 3
Describe the typical design of a college course and the outcomes that result for students in these
courses. In addition, describe a situation in which you found yourself falling into this style of
learning.
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least the
attached textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook,
must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Display competence in the art of analyzing the logic of the subject one is studying.
2. Determine the purpose of analyzing the logic of the subject one is studying.
3. Compare and contrast the logic of college as it is and as it should be.
4. Assess the logic of the four modalities of communication.
5. Appraise the criteria for evaluating an author's reasoning by using the elements of thought.
6. Identify how one should assess one's progress in learning.
7. Describe the strategies for self-assessment.
8. Apply the generic model to various applied majors
Unit Lesson
This lecture continues with the discussion of rhetorical devices.
Downplayers
A downplayer is a word that is inserted in a sentence that undermines something that is being discussed. Let’s take a look at two
sentences that mean the same thing in their deepest structure, but that have radically different connotations due to one word.
“Brent got a B on his exam.”
“Brent only got a B on his exam.”
By inserting the word “only,” the person saying sentence two has downplayed Brent’s achievement. Most people would be
happy, or at least satisfied, with a grade of B on an exam. However, the second sentence seems to diminish Brent’s
accomplishment by indicating that a grade of B on the exam does not meet his or her expectations of Brent. You can think of
downplayers as using scare quotes “” in verbal language. Let’s look at some more examples.
“Yeah, Ellen just got her ‘degree’,”
In this case, the person seems to indicate ...
Appendix D provides an illustration and exemplification of the transferable, content, and stylistic skills that the author has acquired through education and experiences, as well as articulating the values that are most important to the author based on assessments in Appendices B-C. Personality is described as a pattern of values, attitudes, and behaviors that represent distinctive ways of thinking and acting, with Appendices B-C providing insight into the author's inner and social personality. Appendix A documents interests through a Strong Interest Inventory assessment.
How to structure a paragraph to develop a central claim. Make your paragraph cohesive and coherent. Use transition language to link ideas. Use a topic and concluding sentence to frame the paragraph.
The document provides guidance on writing effective introductions for academic papers. It recommends that introductions should:
1) Give context about the topic being discussed and sources used; introduce sources and define key terms and concepts.
2) Explain the topic's significance and your own contribution to the discussion.
3) Set up the structure of the paper by outlining the main points in the order they will be addressed.
The introduction should catch the reader up and prepare them to engage with the topic being debated in a way that reflects the overall content and argument of the paper.
Rhetoric is the art of persuasion tailored to specific audiences and circumstances. This textbook introduces rhetoric by noting it is often misunderstood but has legitimate uses in academia to persuade audiences to think differently based on evidence while avoiding bias. The goal of academic rhetoric is to seek truth through logic and evidence rather than emotion or moral judgments.
Introduction to library research for college writing students. Reviews types of sources, and how to use common research tools on a library website. Ends with a collaborate activity where students create an annotated bibliography.
This document provides guidance on revising writing at the sentence level by eliminating unnecessary words, sharpening vague language, and reducing passive voice. It encourages writers to make every word purposeful by getting rid of filler language and words that do not add meaning. Vague terms that could have multiple interpretations are to be replaced with clear, specific language. Passive voice often obscures meaning and can be weakened by rewriting sentences in the active voice when possible. Examples are provided and analyzed to demonstrate techniques for concise, clear sentence revision.
This document provides guidance on writing an informative essay with a focus on unity, coherence, and organization. It recommends choosing a clear topic and identifying relevant sub-topics to structure the essay. The writer then chooses to focus on the sub-topics of vampires and burial practices and vampires and disease epidemics in Slavic folklore. Examples are given of organizing the essay by types of sub-topics or chronologically. Supporting each sub-topic with evidence from sources is also discussed. Text features can aid readers' understanding but the main text must provide the essential information.
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
2. Thesis Statement as Blueprint
It’s a promise you keep to your reader; stick to it
Contains the “seeds” or “map” to the rest of your
paper
It should change as your plan changes
Set-up, central claim, reasoning
4. Strengthening Your Thesis
The Problem: Not Clear
How to Spot It: It’s hard to find your main idea
or argument.
How to Fix It: No surprises or games. State
your main point in plain language.
“bad” “costly,” “unhealthy,” “toxic,” “illegal,”
“low-quality”
“In the course
readings, I
noticed a lot of
metaphors.”
“Articles A and B use a lot of metaphors
about X, Y, and Z to show that…”
“It could be
argued that X
is Y.” “I found that X is Y.”
“Many
psychologists
say that...”
“Because many psychologists say X,
patients/lawmakers/parents should do
Y.”
5. Strengthening Your Thesis
The Problem: Not Specific
How to Spot It: Vague words like “many,”
“important,” “several,” “something,” or
non-specific measurements like “bad,”
“interesting,” or “right”
How to Fix It: Change vague words to specific
words. Give examples of what you mean. Don’t
be afraid to have a long, detailed thesis.
“bad” “costly,” “unhealthy,” “toxic,” “illegal,”
“low-quality”
“bad” “costly,” “unhealthy,” “toxic,” “illegal,”
“low-quality”
“for many
reasons” “because A, B, and C”
“the right thing
to do”
“the most effective policy,” “the solution
for the majority of users”
6. Strengthening Your Thesis
The Problem: Not Arguable/Supportable
How to Spot It: Opinions, moral judgments,
generalizations
How to Fix It: Stick to claims that you can
support with the evidence you have.
“bad” “costly,” “unhealthy,” “toxic,” “illegal,”
“low-quality”
“X is wrong
and unfair.”
“X causes the following (measurable)
problems…”
“I don’t agree
with A’s
argument.”
“I don’t agree with A’s argument
because A’s evidence is
outdated/insufficient/irrelevant.”
“Everybody
knows that…”
“Studies by A, B, and C have shown
that…”
7. Strengthening Your Thesis
The Problem: Inappropriate Scope
How to Spot It: Yes/no questions (too narrow)
or big, sweeping statements (too broad).
How to Fix It: Experiment with narrowing or
broadening your thesis until you can thoroughly
examine your claims in a paper of this length.
“bad” “costly,” “unhealthy,” “toxic,” “illegal,”
“low-quality”
“All drugs
should be
illegal.”
“Based on medical research in the past
decade, drug A should be illegal unless
prescribed by a physician.”
“The average
voter is over
55.”
“Because voters over 55 have such high
turnout at the polls, this year’s
presidential candidates have...”
“Obesity can be
solved by…”
“X is a promising treatment for obesity
in children…”
8. Not so much… Yes!
A.) “There is a problem with the fact that some
hamburgers contain somewhat too much lighter
fluid.”
A.) “Recent studies that show fatal levels of lighter
fluid in McMeaty’s hamburgers show a lack of
sufficient Health Department oversight in the
fast food industry.”
Good Thesis, Bad Thesis
NOT
SPECIFIC
9. Not so much… Yes!
B.) “Putting sweaters on little dogs is sick and
wrong.”
B.) “The cultural practice of putting sweaters on
little dogs illustrates the increasing influence of
fashion over every aspect of our daily lives.”
Good Thesis, Bad Thesis
NOT
ARGUABLE
10. Not so much… Yes!
C.) “Some scholars say that goldfish are dangerous
pets. Others disagree.”
C.) “While scholars disagree over the danger of
keeping goldfish as pets, it remains clear that
after the recent rash of goldfish-related deaths,
stricter laws must be instituted to protect
children from potential harm.”
Good Thesis, Bad Thesis
UNCLEAR
11. Not so much… Yes!
D.) “Television teaches children a variety of
damaging messages.”
D/E.) “A variety of popular early-childhood
television shows, especially Yo-Gabba-Gabba
and My Little Pony, teach children to hold
unrealistic expectations about adult life.”
Good Thesis, Bad Thesis
TOO BROAD
TOO NARROW
E.) “Yo-Gabba-Gabba teaches
children to be unconcerned when
they are abducted by dancing
aliens.”