Download to read offline
More Related Content
Similar to Workshop 1: 'Collaborative writing' by Professor Paul Gibbs
Workshop 1: 'Collaborative writing' by Professor Paul Gibbs
- 1.
- 2. Research Editorial supply chainand journal management structure: journals Author Editor Publisher/ Managing Editor Production Users Quality research papers EAB and reviewers Solicits new papers Handles review process Promotes journal to peers Attends conferences Develops new areas of coverage The link between the publishing company and editor Helps editors succeed in their role and build a first class journal Overall responsibility for journal Promotion and marketing Attends conferences Handles production issues QA – sub-editing and proof reading Convert to SGML for online databases Print production Despatch Added value from publisher Access via library Hard copy Database Third party
- 3.
- 4. What journal shouldyou submit to? Higher Education Pedagogies Teaching in Higher Education Higher education Journal generally Discipline specific
- 5. Let do it! Form group Think of ideas or how to generate idea Consider journals Reflect on the process
- 6. A social practiceincluding: Coordination Communication (negotiation) Cooperation External factors What is Collaborative Writing?
- 7. Group size: Small Vs. Large Social status of members : Equal Vs. Hierarchical Time : Synchronous Vs. Asynchronous Space : Distributed or at the same place Text length Types of text Different conceptions of the task among collaborators Individual goals Vs. Group’s Complexity and Diversity
- 8. Issues in Collaborative Writing SequentialReciprocal Parallel
- 9. Organisation: The efficient meeting Managementof conflict Communication issues: Effective communication, What to communicate about Communication medium Issues in Collaborative Writing
- 10. Routing procedures the materialbetween the members Version control Commenting Strategies E-mail Inserting the comments in the original document Annotation features in your word processor. Issues in Collaborative Writing
- 11. "A Review ofthe use of Action Research in Higher Education", Case Study
- 12. Paul Gibbs, PatriciaCartney, Kate Wilkinson, John Parkinson, Sheila Cunningham, Carl James-Reynolds, Tarek Zoubir, Venetia Brown, Phil Barter, Pauline Sumner, Angus MacDonald, Asanka Dayananda & Alexandra Pitt Education Action Research The Team & Journal
- 13. This literature reviewconsiders the use of action research in higher education. The review specifically looks at two areas of higher education activity. The first concerns academic teaching practice and includes a discussion of research and pedagogy practice, and staff development. The second considers student engagement. In both of these core features of higher education, action research has proven to be a central approach to the investigation, reflection and improvement of practice. Each of these main foci includes a discussion of the limitations of the literature. The review illustrates the extent and range of uses to have benefited from an action research approach. Outcome
- 14. Interest judgingmeeting Establish common goal, trust and leadership (Patricia Cartney) Set objectives Decide on writing and synthesis process Review and critique Dealing with publisher and reviewers Process
- 15. In someways this is an interesting read but I have a number of reservations that temper my enthusiasm for the paper. This is an incredibly ambitious yet potentially very useful paper exploring the application of action research in higher education (HE) through various lenses.
- 16. This paper isinteresting for the Journal audience and makes a relevant contribution, specially for its combination of lesson studies and action learning. Second response