This study aimed to improve test construction practices among instructors in the Civil Engineering department at Mattu University. It reviewed literature on best practices for test construction and developed an action plan. This included using blueprints to align test items with content, following principles for different item types, and providing instructors training and feedback. Pre- and post-strategy evaluations found that the instructors' abilities to construct effective tests improved after implementing the developed strategies. The study concluded that improving teachers' test-making skills through collaborative professional development can enhance learning outcomes for students.
Professor Michele Pistone, Villanova University, shares her insights on assessment for legal education, including formative and summative assessment. She explains the difference between formative and summative assessments and the components of effective assessment tools. For more information about online learning, visit, Legaledweb.com and You tube/ LegalED.
This document discusses guidelines for setting effective question papers and evaluating answer scripts. It outlines the important factors to consider when framing questions, such as the purpose, objectives, and type of assessment. The types of questions that can be used are described, including objective, short answer, and essay questions. Guidelines are provided for framing questions effectively and evaluating different question types, including preparing scoring keys and marking rubrics. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of teachers playing a role in the evaluation process to create a healthy learning environment.
Triangulation in Teaching Assessment & learning Outcomes (2) (1)Sheema Haider
This document discusses the concept of triangulation in teaching, assessment, and learning outcomes. It defines triangulation as collecting evidence of student learning from conversations (intended learning outcomes), observations (teaching methods), and products (assessments). The document emphasizes the need to establish clear links between these three elements. It provides examples of mapping intended learning outcomes to specific teaching strategies and assessment methods. The conclusion is that faculty need education on developing intended learning outcomes, incorporating innovative teaching methods focused on the outcomes, and using assessment based on the outcomes from multiple sources.
The Masters of Business and Technology Program offer a range of study skills webinars for students. This is the exam prep webinar. For any copyright issues or to request a takedown please contact a.chambers@unsw.edu.au. Note this work is not at present under a CCSA licence.
This document outlines key aspects of outcome-based education (OBE) and the accreditation process for engineering programs. It discusses OBE principles like focusing on what students learn rather than what is taught. The document also describes international accords for engineers, technologists, and technicians. It provides details on curriculum review, teaching methods, assessment tools, and continuous quality improvement in OBE. Finally, it lists the documentation required for accreditation visits, including program outcomes, course files, facilities, and actions taken on previous deficiencies.
This document provides guidance on designing a course syllabus. It compares key elements of course design to those of a research project. Some of the main steps outlined include determining student backgrounds and interests, formulating learning objectives based on these as well as the instructor's expertise, and choosing an appropriate scope and content. The document also discusses developing learning experiences and assessments to achieve the objectives and preparing the syllabus. Key components that should be included in the syllabus are identified, such as course information, policies, and required materials. The purpose of writing learning objectives and designing the syllabus from a learner-centered perspective are also addressed.
This study aimed to improve test construction practices among instructors in the Civil Engineering department at Mattu University. It reviewed literature on best practices for test construction and developed an action plan. This included using blueprints to align test items with content, following principles for different item types, and providing instructors training and feedback. Pre- and post-strategy evaluations found that the instructors' abilities to construct effective tests improved after implementing the developed strategies. The study concluded that improving teachers' test-making skills through collaborative professional development can enhance learning outcomes for students.
Professor Michele Pistone, Villanova University, shares her insights on assessment for legal education, including formative and summative assessment. She explains the difference between formative and summative assessments and the components of effective assessment tools. For more information about online learning, visit, Legaledweb.com and You tube/ LegalED.
This document discusses guidelines for setting effective question papers and evaluating answer scripts. It outlines the important factors to consider when framing questions, such as the purpose, objectives, and type of assessment. The types of questions that can be used are described, including objective, short answer, and essay questions. Guidelines are provided for framing questions effectively and evaluating different question types, including preparing scoring keys and marking rubrics. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of teachers playing a role in the evaluation process to create a healthy learning environment.
Triangulation in Teaching Assessment & learning Outcomes (2) (1)Sheema Haider
This document discusses the concept of triangulation in teaching, assessment, and learning outcomes. It defines triangulation as collecting evidence of student learning from conversations (intended learning outcomes), observations (teaching methods), and products (assessments). The document emphasizes the need to establish clear links between these three elements. It provides examples of mapping intended learning outcomes to specific teaching strategies and assessment methods. The conclusion is that faculty need education on developing intended learning outcomes, incorporating innovative teaching methods focused on the outcomes, and using assessment based on the outcomes from multiple sources.
The Masters of Business and Technology Program offer a range of study skills webinars for students. This is the exam prep webinar. For any copyright issues or to request a takedown please contact a.chambers@unsw.edu.au. Note this work is not at present under a CCSA licence.
This document outlines key aspects of outcome-based education (OBE) and the accreditation process for engineering programs. It discusses OBE principles like focusing on what students learn rather than what is taught. The document also describes international accords for engineers, technologists, and technicians. It provides details on curriculum review, teaching methods, assessment tools, and continuous quality improvement in OBE. Finally, it lists the documentation required for accreditation visits, including program outcomes, course files, facilities, and actions taken on previous deficiencies.
This document provides guidance on designing a course syllabus. It compares key elements of course design to those of a research project. Some of the main steps outlined include determining student backgrounds and interests, formulating learning objectives based on these as well as the instructor's expertise, and choosing an appropriate scope and content. The document also discusses developing learning experiences and assessments to achieve the objectives and preparing the syllabus. Key components that should be included in the syllabus are identified, such as course information, policies, and required materials. The purpose of writing learning objectives and designing the syllabus from a learner-centered perspective are also addressed.
The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy and its role in outcome-based education. It begins by outlining Bloom's Taxonomy, which categorizes different levels of thinking skills from basic recall/remembering to more complex analysis, evaluation, and creation. It then discusses how outcome-based education shifts the focus from inputs/processes to outputs/outcomes by defining learning outcomes and using assessments to evaluate if students achieve those outcomes. This allows for continuous quality improvement by collecting feedback and making improvements. Program outcomes, course outcomes, and their mapping are an important part of the outcome-based approach.
This document provides information on learning objectives for course development. It defines learning objectives as statements of what learners will be able to do upon completing instructional activities. The document outlines the components of good learning objectives, including that they should be specific, measurable, written from the student's perspective, and contain one action verb. It also discusses Bloom's Taxonomy for classifying objectives and the importance of alignment between objectives, assessments, and instructional strategies. Characteristics of both good and bad learning objectives are provided.
The document provides guidance on planning a written test by setting objectives and developing a table of specifications (TOS). It discusses the importance of setting clear instructional objectives and designing a TOS to ensure the test adequately measures the intended outcomes. The TOS should map objectives to content areas, cognitive levels, item formats, and weights. It then provides steps for creating a TOS, including determining objectives, topic coverage, weights, item numbers, and formats like one-way, two-way, and three-way tables. Sample test questions and exercises are included to help understand applying the concepts when developing assessments.
This document provides guidance to students on approaching multiple choice questions and online exams. It discusses understanding formative and summative assessments, assessment plans, continuous and online assessment strategies. It provides tips on preparing for online exams, understanding question types like essays, short answers, problems and case studies. It emphasizes reading exam instructions carefully and using past assessments to prepare.
Learning outcome,Task and Topic analysis,Sequencing and chunking.Make a session plan( introduction, body, conclusion).
Linking of Learning Outcomes with Teaching, Learning Activities and Assessment.
This document provides information and guidance for developing effective assessment tasks. It discusses linking assessment to learning outcomes, setting the appropriate level according to the NQF framework, and different types and purposes of assessment. Guidelines are provided for writing good learning outcomes and developing rubrics and criteria for assessment tasks. Different taxonomies for generating outcomes and assessments are explained, including Bloom's and Biggs' SOLO taxonomy. The document also covers reliability and validity in assessment, and provides tips for writing exam papers and checklists for moderation. Participants will work on tasks to develop assessment activities and criteria for outcomes, and compare sample exam papers.
This document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy and its application in outcome-based education. It begins by outlining Bloom's Taxonomy, which categorizes different levels of thinking skills from basic recall/remembering to more complex analysis, evaluation, and creation. It then discusses how outcome-based education focuses on defining learning outcomes and using assessments to ensure students achieve those outcomes and provide feedback for continuous improvement. The document provides examples of how to write learning outcomes at different levels of Bloom's Taxonomy and outlines the process of defining program outcomes, course outcomes, and mapping course outcomes to program outcomes in an outcome-based education framework.
This document provides guidance on evaluation techniques for CIE Economics examinations. It outlines the four assessment objectives, including the weightings for each paper. AO4 focuses on critically evaluating information, arguments, proposals and policies. Key words that indicate evaluation is required are identified. The document then provides advice on how to effectively evaluate, including ranking arguments, considering short and long-run impacts, reliability of information, unintended consequences, and more effective alternatives. It recommends including evaluation throughout essays rather than just at the end. Students are advised to practice evaluating by checking mark schemes first before writing answers.
Performance-Based Assessment (Assessment of Learning 2, Chapter 2))paj261997
This document discusses performance-based assessment. It defines performance-based assessment as a direct and systematic observation of student performance based on predetermined criteria. This is presented as an alternative form of assessment to traditional paper-and-pencil tests. The document outlines key features of performance-based assessment, including greater realism and complexity of tasks, as well as greater time needed for assessment and use of judgment in scoring. It also discusses different types of performance-based assessment, developing rubrics to evaluate student performance, and the advantages and limitations of this assessment approach.
The document outlines the stages of test construction including determining test aspects, planning content and format, writing test items, preparing items, reviewing items, pre-testing, validating items, and providing guidelines for constructing test items. It discusses determining test purpose and scope, sampling content representative of the course material, avoiding test-wiseness, reviewing items after sufficient time, analyzing pre-test results, and ensuring a range of difficulty levels and skills are assessed.
This document provides guidelines for creating syllabi for courses at a university. It outlines 6 steps for developing the content and structure of syllabi, including: 1) identifying topics and planning teaching/learning activities; 2) formulating intended learning outcomes; 3) identifying course outcomes; 4) aligning outcomes with program outcomes; 5) including values, policies, references and approval processes. Faculty are instructed to discuss the new format with colleagues and ensure alignment between all syllabus components to guide student learning and assessment.
Student Learning Objectives, Mississippi Department of Education, Research in Action, Educator Effectiveness, Assessment Literacy, Assessment, Teacher Effectiveness, Policy
This document provides an orientation to the student learning/support objective (SLO/SSO) process. It defines key terms like SLOs, SSOs, standards, and measures. The process involves three phases - design, build, and review - with five steps nested within: developing a goal statement, identifying standards, creating a blueprint, reviewing the template, and evaluating performance. The training modules will guide educators through each phase to design, build, and review high-quality SLOs/SSOs aligned to content or professional standards and measured by performance targets. Online resources provide templates, examples, and supplemental materials to support educators in completing the SLO/SSO process.
This document discusses developing assessment instruments. It describes four types of criterion-referenced tests: entry skills tests, pretests, practice tests, and posttests. It also discusses test design domains, mastery levels, test item criteria, formats, and alternative assessments like portfolios. The document stresses the importance of congruence between objectives, instructional materials, and assessments. Learners should be assessed on the exact behaviors outlined in the objectives.
Principles of test construction (10 27-2010)Omar Jacalne
The document discusses guidelines for writing different types of classroom tests, including multiple choice, true/false, matching, and short answer questions. It provides reasons for each guideline, such as avoiding confusing students with too many negatives or incomplete sentences. The document also covers Bloom's Taxonomy, which classifies learning objectives into different levels, from remembering to creating. Sample questions are provided for each level of learning, from basic recall questions to more complex questions requiring analysis, evaluation and creative thinking.
Preparation of Classroom Assessment (SLP-B @ BISCAST)Ireno Alcala
The document discusses the preparation of classroom assessments. It outlines the importance of planning stages, learning objectives, relationships between objectives and testing, and using a table of specifications to ensure valid and reliable tests. It provides details on factors to consider when planning teacher-made tests, such as objectives, teaching strategies, and evaluative procedures. Guidelines are given for constructing objective-type tests, including writing clear questions and avoiding irrelevant clues. The document also discusses Ralph Tyler's evaluation framework and the role of various scholars in the field of educational assessment.
Marc Singer - Introduction to Critical Reasoning OERu course remixWayne Mackintosh
Presentation prepared by Marc Singer, Thomas Edison State College for the 3rd OERu Partners meeting describing the remix of an OERu course and development of summative assessment.
1) The document outlines the steps in test development, including defining the testing universe, target audience, and purpose; developing a test plan; composing test items; writing administration instructions; and conducting a pilot test.
2) Key aspects of developing a test plan include defining the construct being measured, choosing a test format, and developing test administration and scoring procedures.
3) Effective test item writing involves consulting the test plan, ensuring items assess the defined testing universe, using clear and appropriate language for the audience, and having items reviewed by experts.
This document provides guidance on writing essays for students. It covers important aspects of structure, organization, style, and clarity. Part 1 focuses on creating a good structure, including having a clear introduction, main body, and conclusion. It also outlines the main stages of essay writing such as analyzing the question, planning, researching, and drafting. Part 2 discusses writing in an academic style, using sources to support arguments, and expressing ideas clearly. The document aims to help students learn best practices for writing successful university essays.
The Revised Basic Education Curriculum 2002 aimed to improve Philippine education standards. It sought to provide learners with knowledge, skills, attitudes and values to develop personally and contribute to society. It emphasized functional literacy and life skills. The curriculum was decongested into five core subjects - Filipino, English, Math, Science and Makabayan (civics). Values education was integrated across all subjects to develop learners who are patriotic, humane, environmentally conscious and spiritual. The goal was to produce well-rounded citizens through an interactive and skills-focused education system.
This document discusses different measures of variability used to describe the dispersion of data, including range, interquartile range, standard deviation, and variance. It provides formulas and examples to calculate each measure using a sample data set of time spent on phones daily by high school students. The range tells the difference between highest and lowest values, while the interquartile range describes the middle half of data. Standard deviation and variance measure how far data points are from the mean, with variance being the average of squared deviations and standard deviation being the square root of variance.
The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy and its role in outcome-based education. It begins by outlining Bloom's Taxonomy, which categorizes different levels of thinking skills from basic recall/remembering to more complex analysis, evaluation, and creation. It then discusses how outcome-based education shifts the focus from inputs/processes to outputs/outcomes by defining learning outcomes and using assessments to evaluate if students achieve those outcomes. This allows for continuous quality improvement by collecting feedback and making improvements. Program outcomes, course outcomes, and their mapping are an important part of the outcome-based approach.
This document provides information on learning objectives for course development. It defines learning objectives as statements of what learners will be able to do upon completing instructional activities. The document outlines the components of good learning objectives, including that they should be specific, measurable, written from the student's perspective, and contain one action verb. It also discusses Bloom's Taxonomy for classifying objectives and the importance of alignment between objectives, assessments, and instructional strategies. Characteristics of both good and bad learning objectives are provided.
The document provides guidance on planning a written test by setting objectives and developing a table of specifications (TOS). It discusses the importance of setting clear instructional objectives and designing a TOS to ensure the test adequately measures the intended outcomes. The TOS should map objectives to content areas, cognitive levels, item formats, and weights. It then provides steps for creating a TOS, including determining objectives, topic coverage, weights, item numbers, and formats like one-way, two-way, and three-way tables. Sample test questions and exercises are included to help understand applying the concepts when developing assessments.
This document provides guidance to students on approaching multiple choice questions and online exams. It discusses understanding formative and summative assessments, assessment plans, continuous and online assessment strategies. It provides tips on preparing for online exams, understanding question types like essays, short answers, problems and case studies. It emphasizes reading exam instructions carefully and using past assessments to prepare.
Learning outcome,Task and Topic analysis,Sequencing and chunking.Make a session plan( introduction, body, conclusion).
Linking of Learning Outcomes with Teaching, Learning Activities and Assessment.
This document provides information and guidance for developing effective assessment tasks. It discusses linking assessment to learning outcomes, setting the appropriate level according to the NQF framework, and different types and purposes of assessment. Guidelines are provided for writing good learning outcomes and developing rubrics and criteria for assessment tasks. Different taxonomies for generating outcomes and assessments are explained, including Bloom's and Biggs' SOLO taxonomy. The document also covers reliability and validity in assessment, and provides tips for writing exam papers and checklists for moderation. Participants will work on tasks to develop assessment activities and criteria for outcomes, and compare sample exam papers.
This document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy and its application in outcome-based education. It begins by outlining Bloom's Taxonomy, which categorizes different levels of thinking skills from basic recall/remembering to more complex analysis, evaluation, and creation. It then discusses how outcome-based education focuses on defining learning outcomes and using assessments to ensure students achieve those outcomes and provide feedback for continuous improvement. The document provides examples of how to write learning outcomes at different levels of Bloom's Taxonomy and outlines the process of defining program outcomes, course outcomes, and mapping course outcomes to program outcomes in an outcome-based education framework.
This document provides guidance on evaluation techniques for CIE Economics examinations. It outlines the four assessment objectives, including the weightings for each paper. AO4 focuses on critically evaluating information, arguments, proposals and policies. Key words that indicate evaluation is required are identified. The document then provides advice on how to effectively evaluate, including ranking arguments, considering short and long-run impacts, reliability of information, unintended consequences, and more effective alternatives. It recommends including evaluation throughout essays rather than just at the end. Students are advised to practice evaluating by checking mark schemes first before writing answers.
Performance-Based Assessment (Assessment of Learning 2, Chapter 2))paj261997
This document discusses performance-based assessment. It defines performance-based assessment as a direct and systematic observation of student performance based on predetermined criteria. This is presented as an alternative form of assessment to traditional paper-and-pencil tests. The document outlines key features of performance-based assessment, including greater realism and complexity of tasks, as well as greater time needed for assessment and use of judgment in scoring. It also discusses different types of performance-based assessment, developing rubrics to evaluate student performance, and the advantages and limitations of this assessment approach.
The document outlines the stages of test construction including determining test aspects, planning content and format, writing test items, preparing items, reviewing items, pre-testing, validating items, and providing guidelines for constructing test items. It discusses determining test purpose and scope, sampling content representative of the course material, avoiding test-wiseness, reviewing items after sufficient time, analyzing pre-test results, and ensuring a range of difficulty levels and skills are assessed.
This document provides guidelines for creating syllabi for courses at a university. It outlines 6 steps for developing the content and structure of syllabi, including: 1) identifying topics and planning teaching/learning activities; 2) formulating intended learning outcomes; 3) identifying course outcomes; 4) aligning outcomes with program outcomes; 5) including values, policies, references and approval processes. Faculty are instructed to discuss the new format with colleagues and ensure alignment between all syllabus components to guide student learning and assessment.
Student Learning Objectives, Mississippi Department of Education, Research in Action, Educator Effectiveness, Assessment Literacy, Assessment, Teacher Effectiveness, Policy
This document provides an orientation to the student learning/support objective (SLO/SSO) process. It defines key terms like SLOs, SSOs, standards, and measures. The process involves three phases - design, build, and review - with five steps nested within: developing a goal statement, identifying standards, creating a blueprint, reviewing the template, and evaluating performance. The training modules will guide educators through each phase to design, build, and review high-quality SLOs/SSOs aligned to content or professional standards and measured by performance targets. Online resources provide templates, examples, and supplemental materials to support educators in completing the SLO/SSO process.
This document discusses developing assessment instruments. It describes four types of criterion-referenced tests: entry skills tests, pretests, practice tests, and posttests. It also discusses test design domains, mastery levels, test item criteria, formats, and alternative assessments like portfolios. The document stresses the importance of congruence between objectives, instructional materials, and assessments. Learners should be assessed on the exact behaviors outlined in the objectives.
Principles of test construction (10 27-2010)Omar Jacalne
The document discusses guidelines for writing different types of classroom tests, including multiple choice, true/false, matching, and short answer questions. It provides reasons for each guideline, such as avoiding confusing students with too many negatives or incomplete sentences. The document also covers Bloom's Taxonomy, which classifies learning objectives into different levels, from remembering to creating. Sample questions are provided for each level of learning, from basic recall questions to more complex questions requiring analysis, evaluation and creative thinking.
Preparation of Classroom Assessment (SLP-B @ BISCAST)Ireno Alcala
The document discusses the preparation of classroom assessments. It outlines the importance of planning stages, learning objectives, relationships between objectives and testing, and using a table of specifications to ensure valid and reliable tests. It provides details on factors to consider when planning teacher-made tests, such as objectives, teaching strategies, and evaluative procedures. Guidelines are given for constructing objective-type tests, including writing clear questions and avoiding irrelevant clues. The document also discusses Ralph Tyler's evaluation framework and the role of various scholars in the field of educational assessment.
Marc Singer - Introduction to Critical Reasoning OERu course remixWayne Mackintosh
Presentation prepared by Marc Singer, Thomas Edison State College for the 3rd OERu Partners meeting describing the remix of an OERu course and development of summative assessment.
1) The document outlines the steps in test development, including defining the testing universe, target audience, and purpose; developing a test plan; composing test items; writing administration instructions; and conducting a pilot test.
2) Key aspects of developing a test plan include defining the construct being measured, choosing a test format, and developing test administration and scoring procedures.
3) Effective test item writing involves consulting the test plan, ensuring items assess the defined testing universe, using clear and appropriate language for the audience, and having items reviewed by experts.
This document provides guidance on writing essays for students. It covers important aspects of structure, organization, style, and clarity. Part 1 focuses on creating a good structure, including having a clear introduction, main body, and conclusion. It also outlines the main stages of essay writing such as analyzing the question, planning, researching, and drafting. Part 2 discusses writing in an academic style, using sources to support arguments, and expressing ideas clearly. The document aims to help students learn best practices for writing successful university essays.
Similar to WKS 1 Identifying Test Objectives.pptx (20)
The Revised Basic Education Curriculum 2002 aimed to improve Philippine education standards. It sought to provide learners with knowledge, skills, attitudes and values to develop personally and contribute to society. It emphasized functional literacy and life skills. The curriculum was decongested into five core subjects - Filipino, English, Math, Science and Makabayan (civics). Values education was integrated across all subjects to develop learners who are patriotic, humane, environmentally conscious and spiritual. The goal was to produce well-rounded citizens through an interactive and skills-focused education system.
This document discusses different measures of variability used to describe the dispersion of data, including range, interquartile range, standard deviation, and variance. It provides formulas and examples to calculate each measure using a sample data set of time spent on phones daily by high school students. The range tells the difference between highest and lowest values, while the interquartile range describes the middle half of data. Standard deviation and variance measure how far data points are from the mean, with variance being the average of squared deviations and standard deviation being the square root of variance.
The document defines key terms related to curriculum implementation as a change process. It discusses curriculum implementation as putting the designed curriculum into practice through teacher-learner interactions to achieve learning outcomes. Implementing change requires a process that is developmental, participatory, and supportive. The teacher plays a key role in adjusting practices and curricula. Effective implementation requires time, effort, and resources to adjust habits and achieve goals of the new curriculum through ongoing collaboration.
Neuroscience is the study of the nervous system and brain. Technological advances have allowed scientists to research brain development, especially in the first six years when the brain has greater plasticity and ability to change through experiences. The brain's structure, chemicals, and functions can be modified through interactions with the environment during this period of neuroplasticity.
The nervous system has three main functions - receiving sensory input, integrating the input, and responding to stimuli. It is composed of the peripheral and central nervous systems. The central nervous system includes the brain and spinal cord. The brain's three main parts are the cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem, each with specialized functions. Neurons are the fundamental units that
Vygotsky's sociocultural theory views cognitive development as a process that occurs through social interactions. According to Vygotsky, children acquire thinking skills and cultural values through collaborative dialogues with more knowledgeable members of society, such as parents and teachers. Two key concepts in Vygotsky's theory are the zone of proximal development, which is the distance between what a child can do independently and what they can do with guidance and collaboration, and scaffolding, which describes how a more skilled partner supports a child's learning. Vygotsky's theory emphasizes how culture and social context play a central role in children's cognitive development.
The document discusses Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, which proposes that intelligence is comprised of at least eight different abilities rather than a single general ability. It outlines the eight intelligences - linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalist - and provides examples of each. The theory argues that identifying students' multiple intelligences allows teachers to better guide students' learning.
The document discusses Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, which proposes that intelligence is comprised of at least eight different abilities rather than a single general ability. It outlines the eight intelligences - linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalist - and provides examples of each. The theory argues that identifying students' multiple intelligences allows teachers to better guide students' learning.
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
1. WORKSOP ON IDENTIFYING
TEST OBJECTIVES
Objective:
* To ensure alignment among
assessments, learning objectives
and instructional strategies.
2. Why should assessments, learning objectives, and
instructional strategies be aligned?
Assessments
Learning
Objectives
Instructional
Activities
3. * Assessments: What kind of tasks will reveal
whether students have achieved the learning
objectives I have identified?
*Learning Objectives: What do I want students
to know and how to do when they leave this
course?
* Instructional Objectives: What kind of
activities in and out of class will reinforce my
learning objectives and prepare students for
assessments?
4. ▪ Your objective is for students to learn
to apply analytical skills, but your
assessment measures only factual
recall. Consequently, students honing
their analytical skills are frustrated
that the exam does not measure what
they learned.
5. ▪ Your assessment measures students’
ability to compare and critique the
arguments of different authors, but your
instructional strategies focus entirely on
summarizing the arguments of different
authors. Consequently, students do not
learn or practice the skills of comparison
and evaluation that will be assessed.
6. What do well-aligned
assessments look like?
Type of learning
objective
Examples of Appropriate Assessments
Recall
Recognize
Identify
Objective test items such as fill-in-the
blank, matching, labeling, or multiple
choice questions that require students
to:
o Recall or recognize terms, facts and
concepts
7. Type of learning
objective
Examples of Appropriate Assessments
Interpret
Exemplify
Classify
Summarize
Infer
Compare
Explain
Oral questioning, Essay, Performance
task that require students to:
o summarize readings, films or speeches
o compare and contrast two or more
theories, events or processes
o classify or categorize cases, elements,
or events using established criteria
o paraphrase documents or speeches
o find or identify examples or
illustrations of a concept or principle
8. Type of learning
objective
Examples of Appropriate
Assessments
Apply
Execute
Implement
Performance Task, Oral Questioning,
Observations that require students to:
o use procedures to solve or
complete familiar or unfamiliar
tasks
o Determine which procedure(s) are
most appropriate for a given task
9. Type of learning
objective
Examples of Appropriate Assessments
Analyze
Differentiate
Organize
Attribute
Performance task, oral questioning and
observations that require students to:
o discriminate or select relevant and
irrelevant parts
o Determine how elements function
together
o Determine bias, values, or underlying
intent in presented material
10. Type of learning
objective
Examples of Appropriate Assessments
Check
Critique
Assess
Performance task, oral questioning,
observations that require students to:
o test, monitor, judge, or critique
readings, performances, or products
against established criteria or
standards
11. Type of learning
objective
Examples of Appropriate Assessments
Create
Plan
Produce
Design
Performance-based, oral questioning,
observations that require students to:
o Make, build, design or generate
something new
12. Bloom’s taxonomy remix
Putting things together, Creative Thinking
Making Judgment
Breaking Things down, Critical Thinking
Using knowledge in new situations
Understanding
Recall
13. HOTS in chemistry 13
Revised Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive
levels
• To recall facts:
• Define the term ‘rusting’.
• State two substances that are
needed for rusting to occur.
1. Remember
2. Understand
3. Apply
4. Analyze
5. Evaluate
6. Create
14. HOTS in chemistry 14
Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive levels
• To understand the meanings /
organize facts:
• Explain why rusting of iron nail
occurs faster in salt solution
than in tap water.
1. Remember
2. Understand
3. Apply
4. Analyze
5. Evaluate
6. Create
15. HOTS in chemistry 15
Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive levels
• To use (apply) facts, rules or
principles:
• Suggest a metal that is used to
protect underground steel
pipes. Explain your choice.
• Calculate the e.m.f. of the
rusting process from the
electrode potentials of half
reactions.
1. Remember
2. Understand
3. Apply
4. Analyze
5. Evaluate
6. Create
16. HOTS in chemistry 16
Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive levels
• To break down the whole into
it component parts:
• To distinguish between tin-
plating and zinc-plating to
prevent iron cans from
rusting?
1. Remember
2. Understand
3. Apply
4. Analyze
5. Evaluate
6. Create
17. HOTS in chemistry 17
Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive levels
• To justify the value or merits of
an idea/problem
• Discuss the effects of rusting on
social, economic and
environmental aspects of a
society.
1. Remember
2. Understand
3. Apply
4. Analyze
5. Evaluate
6. Create
18. HOTS in chemistry 18
Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive levels
• To put parts together into a
new whole
• Design an experiment to show
that oxygen is essential to
cause rusting.
1. Remember
2. Understand
3. Apply
4. Analyze
5. Evaluate
6. Create
• Construct higher-level questions ⇒ HOTs
19. WORKSHOP PROPER - Group Activity
Instructions:
Browse your topic report and find for possible
objectives to be measured. List at least two
objectives per level of the revised Bloom’s
Taxonomy.
Present your output.