research data readiness in UK
institutions
Digital Curation Centre’s 2015 Survey
Research Data Services, Where are we now and what's next?
London School of Hygeine & Tropical Medicine, 30 June 2015
Angus Whyte
Why what and how?
• National picture of institutional progress
• What are drivers and barriers to that
• Consult on DCC priorities for support
20 questions in online survey sent to PVC-Rs & Research
Office Heads asking for consolidated response
Target 132 Institutions, either in REF2014 >1 UoA
or funded by the EPSRC (70% of those targeted)
• Responses from 60 institutions (45% of target)
of which 47 (78%) EPSRC funded
Who took part?
12
7
6
12
23
Russell Group
1994
Million+
Univ.Alliance
Other/ non-aligned
24
24
13
Results analysis will provide
group averages by:
Affiliation
Research income %
Research intensity
Respondents have first access to
anonymised results (sent) and briefing
(to come) embargoed to July 31st
So only selected highlights…
Drivers
% responses (* 2014 question had no priority ranking, respondents picked from list)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Research support strategy
Research benefits
Protect investment in data
Research integrity/conduct
RC data policies
Govt open data policy
EU Horizon2020 policy
Journal policies
High
Med
Drivers
% responses (* 2014 question had no priority ranking, respondents picked from list)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Research support strategy
Research benefits
Protect investment in data
Research integrity/conduct
RC data policies
Govt open data policy
EU Horizon2020 policy
Journal policies
High
Med

Drivers
% responses (* 2014 question had no priority ranking, respondents picked from list)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Research support strategy
Research benefits
Protect investment in data
Research integrity/conduct
RC data policies
Govt open data policy
EU Horizon2020 policy
Journal policies
High
Med

Skills training & consultancy
Policy and strategy Business planning
Data Mgmt Planning
Managing active dataData cataloguing
Governing access & reuseData preservation
Who has what in place?
% indicating ‘rolling out’ or ‘embedding’ * referred to ‘access & storage systems’ in survey
87% 13%
50%
40%
22%
63%
18%
38%
*
Barriers
% responses (* 2014 question had no priority ranking, respondents picked from list)
(1) Question on infrastructure in 2014 combined it with staff resources
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Funding
Knowledge of solutions
Skills/staff resources (1)
Infrastructure
Accepted standards
Management priority
Researchers priority
Cost model uncertainty
Cost recovery uncertainty
Hi
M
Lo
20
External Support?
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Support to connect with peers
Briefings & how-to guides
Interact with policy makers
Examples of service approaches
Cost, benefit & risk models
Networking events
Studies data practices &intentions
quite
highly
% indicating likely to need in next 12 months
Q. When do you expect your institution to be able to ensure that selected
research data collections remain accessible for the long-term (e.g. 10 years+)?
0 10 20 30 40 50
Currently provide
Next 12 months
>12 months
Don't know
2015
2014
Policy commitments are there
%80+ compliance by next May
RDM future looks bright…but
Support still needed
Shared platforms still needed
Are those £ clouds on the horizon?
Conclusion
Questions?
SLIDE CREDITS
• Slide 1 and 10: Christian Bardenhorst. 2011. Far Horizons, https://flic.kr/p/bb9NUv CC-BY-NC-2.0
• Slide 2-4: Wessex Archeaology. 2005. Survey Equipment https://flic.kr/p/7xzxG5 CC-BY-NC-SA
• Slide 5: Taylor, T. 2005. Sunset Ripple https://flic.kr/p/2igqj CC-BY
• Slide 6-8 Pei, B.2010 Work in progress https://flic.kr/p/8XTp8v CC-BY-NC-SA
• Slide 9: US Army. 2012. Overcoming Obstacles https://flic.kr/p/bExfoR CC-BY
With the exception of background photos above,
Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 UK: Scotland License

Research Data Readiness in UK Institutions: Digital Curation Centre’s 2015 Survey

  • 1.
    research data readinessin UK institutions Digital Curation Centre’s 2015 Survey Research Data Services, Where are we now and what's next? London School of Hygeine & Tropical Medicine, 30 June 2015 Angus Whyte
  • 2.
    Why what andhow? • National picture of institutional progress • What are drivers and barriers to that • Consult on DCC priorities for support 20 questions in online survey sent to PVC-Rs & Research Office Heads asking for consolidated response Target 132 Institutions, either in REF2014 >1 UoA or funded by the EPSRC (70% of those targeted) • Responses from 60 institutions (45% of target) of which 47 (78%) EPSRC funded
  • 3.
    Who took part? 12 7 6 12 23 RussellGroup 1994 Million+ Univ.Alliance Other/ non-aligned 24 24 13 Results analysis will provide group averages by: Affiliation Research income % Research intensity
  • 4.
    Respondents have firstaccess to anonymised results (sent) and briefing (to come) embargoed to July 31st So only selected highlights…
  • 5.
    Drivers % responses (*2014 question had no priority ranking, respondents picked from list) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Research support strategy Research benefits Protect investment in data Research integrity/conduct RC data policies Govt open data policy EU Horizon2020 policy Journal policies High Med
  • 6.
    Drivers % responses (*2014 question had no priority ranking, respondents picked from list) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Research support strategy Research benefits Protect investment in data Research integrity/conduct RC data policies Govt open data policy EU Horizon2020 policy Journal policies High Med 
  • 7.
    Drivers % responses (*2014 question had no priority ranking, respondents picked from list) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Research support strategy Research benefits Protect investment in data Research integrity/conduct RC data policies Govt open data policy EU Horizon2020 policy Journal policies High Med 
  • 8.
    Skills training &consultancy Policy and strategy Business planning Data Mgmt Planning Managing active dataData cataloguing Governing access & reuseData preservation Who has what in place? % indicating ‘rolling out’ or ‘embedding’ * referred to ‘access & storage systems’ in survey 87% 13% 50% 40% 22% 63% 18% 38% *
  • 9.
    Barriers % responses (*2014 question had no priority ranking, respondents picked from list) (1) Question on infrastructure in 2014 combined it with staff resources 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Funding Knowledge of solutions Skills/staff resources (1) Infrastructure Accepted standards Management priority Researchers priority Cost model uncertainty Cost recovery uncertainty Hi M Lo 20
  • 10.
    External Support? 0 2040 60 80 100 120 Support to connect with peers Briefings & how-to guides Interact with policy makers Examples of service approaches Cost, benefit & risk models Networking events Studies data practices &intentions quite highly % indicating likely to need in next 12 months
  • 11.
    Q. When doyou expect your institution to be able to ensure that selected research data collections remain accessible for the long-term (e.g. 10 years+)? 0 10 20 30 40 50 Currently provide Next 12 months >12 months Don't know 2015 2014
  • 12.
    Policy commitments arethere %80+ compliance by next May RDM future looks bright…but Support still needed Shared platforms still needed Are those £ clouds on the horizon? Conclusion
  • 13.
    Questions? SLIDE CREDITS • Slide1 and 10: Christian Bardenhorst. 2011. Far Horizons, https://flic.kr/p/bb9NUv CC-BY-NC-2.0 • Slide 2-4: Wessex Archeaology. 2005. Survey Equipment https://flic.kr/p/7xzxG5 CC-BY-NC-SA • Slide 5: Taylor, T. 2005. Sunset Ripple https://flic.kr/p/2igqj CC-BY • Slide 6-8 Pei, B.2010 Work in progress https://flic.kr/p/8XTp8v CC-BY-NC-SA • Slide 9: US Army. 2012. Overcoming Obstacles https://flic.kr/p/bExfoR CC-BY With the exception of background photos above, Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 UK: Scotland License