These are slides from a workshop given by Sheila Webber and Pamela McKinney, University of Sheffield, UK, at the European Conference on Information Literacy on September 26 2018. The objectives of the workshop were: (1) To identify key characteristics of selected qualitative and mixed-methods research approaches, and to show what kinds of research questions and problems each approach is most suited to. The research approaches covered were: action research; case study; phenomenography; ethnography; autoethnography.
(2) To enable participants to understand the issues, advantages and disadvantages of different approaches, by looking at a practice-based information literacy problem, and asking participants to identify the implications of choosing one approach or another."
What's my approach? Deciding on the approach to use for your research
1. Sheila Webber and Pamela McKinney
Information School, University of Sheffield
ECIL, Oulu, September 2018
What's my
approach?
Deciding on
the approach
to use for your
research
2. Outline
• Introductions
• Presentation: Key characteristics of research
approaches: action research; case study;
phenomenography; ethnography; autoethnography
• Activity: Applying different approaches to an information
literacy scenario
– You will work in groups: each group seeing how one of the
research approaches might be used
• Sharing: Presenting how you would use your approach
Webber & McKinney, 2018
4. Workshop objectives
• To identify key characteristics of selected qualitative and
mixed-methods research approaches, and to show what
kinds of research questions and problems each approach is
most suited to
• To enable participants to understand the issues,
advantages and disadvantages of different approaches, by
looking at a practice-based information literacy problem,
and asking participants to identify the implications of
choosing one approach or another.
By the end of the workshop participants should have an
extended understanding of the research approaches
available, what they should consider when deciding which
approach to use, and the implications of their choices
Webber&McKinney,2018
5. What do we mean by Research Approach?
• That choosing that approach affects all the aspects
of the research: research question or aims, data
collection, data analysis, and possibly also how you
present results
• Sometimes referred to as research design (although
all research should have a design) or research
methodology (i.e. rather than research methods)
Webber & McKinney, 2018
7. Useful when: You want to
explore a specific question or
problem, in a specific context
Webber & McKinney, 2018
8. A definition
“Case studies are analyses of persons, events,
decisions, periods, projects, policies, institutions, or other
systems that are studied holistically by one or more
methods. The case that is the subject of the inquiry will
be an instance of a class of phenomena that provides an
analytical frame – an object – within which the study is
conducted and which the case illuminates and explicates”
(Thomas, 2011b, 513)
See also Thomas (2011a)
Webber & McKinney, 2018
9. Characteristics
• Investigating a specific problem or question
• Doing so in a “bounded context” i.e. you can tell fairly
easily whether something is inside or outside the
context you are focusing on
• You collect multiple sources of evidence to get
different perspectives on the problem
• Start by describing relevant features of the context:
can be useful in helping you to “step back” from
familiar context
Webber & McKinney, 2018
10. Characteristics
• Outcome may be a model or theory and/or practical
recommendations relating to the whole case
• Can be used in combination with other methods
• Case study useful in setting the boundaries, focusing on
the problem & its setting, and reminding you to look at
the whole picture
• Note the difference between systematically planned and
researched case study and just describing one example
or anecdote
Webber & McKinney, 2018
11. Example: Dr Syeda Hina Batool
• “System”: primary schools
in Lahore, Pakistan
• “Object”: information
literacy, including its
relationship to the Pakistani
school curriculum and to
relevant IL frameworks
See: Shahid (2016); Batool &
Webber (2017)
Photographer:unknownUoSgraduate
Syeda Hina Batool (l) and Sheila Webber
12. Interviews with teachers
Focus
groups with
children
Observation,
photos and
field notes
Curriculum
documents,
handouts etc.
Each case
= 1 school
6 schools,
purposive
sample of
different
types Material
produced by
children in
focus groups
Data
analysis
Also: description of the state of education in Pakistan, and an
analysis of the Pakistani school curriculum, using James Herring’s
PLUS model (Purpose, Location, Use, Self-Evaluation)
Webber&McKinney,2018
13. Her analysis and outcomes
• Rich description of each school, bringing out the
context and distinctiveness of each case
• Thematic analysis (teacher’s pedagogic approach;
Physical environment; Conceptions of “library”)
• Analysis of children’s level of skill in different aspects of
information literacy
• Proposed model of information literacy for primary
school children in Pakistan
• Situational analysis, putting the cases in the socio-
cultural context
• Proposed plan for developing IL in Pakistan
Webber & McKinney, 2018
15. Useful when: You want to
understand a group or culture in
more depth: not just behaviour, but
how the people feel, how they
interact socially, their context
Dent Goodman (2011: 1) cites Fetterman as describing
ethnographic writing as “the art and science of
describing a group or culture”
Webber & McKinney, 2018
16. • Data collected: Observation, participation, the researchers’ field
notes & memos, interviews
• Analysis will result in a rich picture or narrative of the culture or
group
• Popularised for librarians by the ERIAL (Ethnographic
Research in Illinois Academic Libraries) project (Asher and
Miller, 2010) & UX (User Experience) conferences & seminars
(e.g. http://uxlib.org/uxlibs4/ or
http://www.ala.org/lita/contextual-inquiry-using-ethnographic-
research-impact-your-library-ux)
(though, in particular, some significant ethnographic
information behaviour studies well before this!)
Webber & McKinney, 2018
17. Khoo, Rozaklis and Hall (2012: 86) talk about the
“growing complexity of the social and technological
environments within which libraries are situated” and
other factors “prompting libraries to think about how
to describe their strengths, not just in terms of
performance and metrics, but also in terms of the
wider social cultural value they offer to users and
communities”
Can be used directly to guide policy and improve services
Can provide vivid human stories which may convey
the library’s value more effectively than bare numbers
Webber & McKinney, 2018
18. • Regaldo and Smale (2015) investigated how
students used (or did not use) the library for their
coursework (City University of New York)
• Data collected: Mapping diaries; student photos
with elicitation interviews; interviews about the
process of doing an assignment
• Notable finding: students liked private, individual
spaces e.g. carrels: a large number commuted and
did not have a quiet space to study at home
Webber & McKinney, 2018
19. “I live in the library.
The library is, like,
my fulltime job.
When I don’t have
classes, I still come
to the library
because there’s too
many distractions at
home and in order
for me to be a
successful,
productive student, I
have to come to
school, to remain
dedicated and
driven” (p908)
21. “an approach to research and writing that
seeks to describe and systematically
analyze (graphy) personal experience
(auto) in order to understand cultural
experience (ethno)”
Ellis et al. (2011: 273)
Webber & McKinney, 2018
22. Reflexivity of the
ethnographic
researcher,
questioning and
identifying their own
stance in relation to
the object of study
Reflexivity of the
autoethnographic
researcher, examining their
own practice, feelings,
interactions, in a specific
cultural or social context
Webber & McKinney, 2018
23. ethnographic
researcher, focusing on
a group or culture, but
making it plain how the
researcher functioned in,
or influenced, the
group/culture being
studies
autoethnographic
researcher, focusing on
their own thoughts,
feelings, & practice, but
aiming to give
social/cultural insights that
are interesting to more
than just the researcher
Webber & McKinney, 2018
24. Autoethnography is about...
• Understanding better one’s own practice, motivation,
feelings, place
• Providing insight for others in a similar situation
• Making the librarian visible in whatever context they are
in
• Providing others with insight into the library’s and
librarian’s role
• Gaining better understanding of the social and cultural
context
Webber & McKinney, 2018
25. What do you do?
• Identify the aim or research question (thinking about - what is the
“cultural experience” you are illuminating through your
autoethnography?
• Data will include memos or diary entries that you write for the project:
may also include existing documents, videos, photos...
• Focused on you, but others may be implicated: you are still likely to
need ethics review (depending on your place of work)
• Data analysis involves making sense of the data to tell your
autoethnographic story: may include more traditional approaches such
as thematic analysis, though that should not dominate
• You can incorporate reflections on how your narrative connects with
other research literature
• Autoethnographies can be presented as semi-fictionalised narratives,
poems, pictures, dance ....
Webber & McKinney, 2018
26. • Grace and Sen (2013): community resilience and the
role of the public library
• Patin (2015): role of the school library during the
aftermath of hurricanes Katrina and Rita
• Deitering, Schroeder & Stoddart’s (2017) book of
academic librarians’ autoethnography (some
chapters available open access)
• Useful to identify a writing
group you can work with to support
each other’s work
Examples
Webber&McKinney,2018
27. “This chapter is
formatted to represent
three separate
narratives:
• conversational,
represented by the
italicized, indented
text;
• analytical,
represented in the
traditional text body
and supported by
scholarly literature;
• and self-reflective,
represented by the
text box insets”
Webber&McKinney,2018
29. “Phenomenography is the
empirical study of the differing
ways in which people
experience, perceive, apprehend,
understand, conceptualise
various phenomena in and
aspects of the world around us.”
(Marton 1994)
Marton at the SIG
Phenomenography
conference in 2016
Webber & McKinney, 2018
30. Useful when: You want insight
into how different people are
experiencing or conceiving of
something
The phenomenon (the “something”) could be:
the library; a specific learning experience;
using the catalogue … you are looking at it
indirectly, through the interviewees’ eyes
Webber & McKinney, 2018
31. The research question will be in the form of:
What are the qualitatively different ways in which
[the population] conceive of/ experience [the
phenomenon]
Started with investigating learning, but wide variety of
phenomena have been investigated in different
disciplinary contexts (e.g. the operating theatre; the
environment; solubility; research; healthy aging; e-
assessment)
Webber & McKinney, 2018
32. Data collection and analysis
• Data collection:
– Usually interviews, participants chosen to maximise variation
– Interview circles round the central question
– Important for interviewers to put their own views to one side
• Analysis
– Analyse all the transcripts together as one “pool”
– Have to end up with a small number of categories, that are distinct,
and between them describe the qualitatively different ways people
think about or experience the phenomenon (unlike some other
approaches in which you look for similarities)
– Also look for dimensions of variations (a few factors which are
important in all the categories, but which are seen differently in
different categories)
Webber & McKinney, 2018
33. Example: Categories from Emily Wheeler’s research
into librarians’ conceptions of themselves as teachers
of information literacy: librarians conceived of
themselves as ...
Wheeler & McKinney (2015)
Dimensions of variation are: identity (teacher/ not a teacher)
and perception of practice (I teach/ do not teach)
34. Applications of phenomenographic research
• Variation theory: having identified how learners’
conceive of a subject, you design learning that enables
them to experience the variations
• Workplace training & education e.g. Masters students at
the Sheffield iSchool were able to use Wheeler’s
framework when reflecting on their own development as
teachers of information literacy
• Understanding people better, so you are better able to
engage with them: the interview itself can be a learning
experience for the interviewee and interviewer
Webber&McKinney,2018
37. Characteristics
• Start with an aspect of practice that you want to improve
• Only feasible if you have to power to make changes to practice;
usually you would be involved in that practice (e.g. you want to
improve your own practice) but might be invited in as a
catalyst/facilitator of change
• The participants are the people affected by, or observers (key
informants) of, the practice
• Multiple sources of data e.g. observations (yours and others’);
reflections (e.g. a reflective diary); documentary evidence (policy
documents, course descriptions, learners’ work & evaluations,
recordings of teaching sessions etc.); focus group and interview
data
Webber & McKinney, 2018
38. Classic cycle is: Plan, Act, Monitor, Reflect
Levy’s (2003; 100) representation of the process
At each stage you may
be drawing on existing
data and creating new
data
Webber&McKinney,2018
39. • Data analysis will relate to the research aims & may
use other frameworks or theories (e.g. educational
theories)
• Malenfant, Hinchliffe and Gilchrist (2016) introduce
special issue or C&RL with action research projects
from the Assessment in Action initiative
• Describe it as “an emergent developmental form”
(p143) (improving practice and developing the
community of inquiry involved in the action research)
Webber & McKinney, 2018
40. Example of using different approaches to
tackle a similar problem
41. Over to you!
• Form groups of about 4
• Each group takes one of the research approaches
• Follow the prompts on the handout to decide how to
use your research approach
• Make a poster with the key points
• Be prepared to present your poster in the final part
of the workshop
Webber & McKinney, 2018
42. Sheila Webber
Information School
University of Sheffield
s.webber@sheffield.ac.uk
Twitter : @SheilaYoshikawa
http://information-literacy.blogspot.com/
http://www.slideshare.net/sheilawebber/
Orcid ID 0000-0002-2280-9519
Pictures by Sheila Webber
Mainly taken in Second Life (a
trademark of Linden Lab)
Pamela McKinney
Information School
University of Sheffield
p.mickinney@sheffield.ac.uk
Twitter : @ischoolpam
Orcid ID 0000-0002-0227-3534
Reference list at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T
scim7Uy-
a6KjlL9YJ1OGysD0hb2YfC0N9T_mrZ3
uzA/edit?usp=sharing
https://tinyurl.com/y72xlhdf