A presentation delivered on 6/28/15 to the Digital Preservation Interest Group, part of the Preservation and Reformatting Section of the Association of Library Collections and Technical Services, which is in turn part of the American Library Association.
Like most libraries, the Ohio State University Libraries did not enter the digital library sphere with clear policies and a unified, inter-operable infrastructure for managing all of our digital collections. The Libraries has a long-standing commitment to making our unique collections accessible to the campus and global communities and maintains an expertly managed and curated Institutional Repository (the Knowledge Bank). But for more than a decade, OSU’s digital collections developed in response to the requirements of specific projects, resulting in a fragmented infrastructure that is difficult to maintain and is ultimately ill suited to long-term preservation and sharing on the global scale to which we aspire.
Thus, for the past several years, the OSU Libraries has been investing heavily in planning and development of a robust repository infrastructure to enhance access, management and preservation of digital collections of all types. As our Fedora repository comes on line, a team of colleagues from across the organization are developing policies and decision making criteria for reappraising digital assets that currently exist in a variety of legacy systems and servers with widely variable metadata, and creating prioritized workflows for preparing and ingesting content into the new repository infrastructure. This presentation will give an overview of our planning process and share some of the workflow documentation currently under development.
What Should Digital Collection Policies Look Like?Jenn Riley
Riley, Jenn. "What Should Digital Collection Policies Look Like?" Panelist in session "Save Our Bits: Approaches to Digital Preservation at TRLN Libraries." Triangle Research Libraries Network Annual Meeting, July 25, 2011, Chapel Hill, NC
Infusing Digital Curation Competencies into the SLIS CurriculumDigCurV
Presentation by Patricia C, Franks, School of Library & Information Science, San Jose State University at the DigCurV International Conference; Framing the digital curation curriculum
6-7 May, 2013
Florence, Rome
What Should Digital Collection Policies Look Like?Jenn Riley
Riley, Jenn. "What Should Digital Collection Policies Look Like?" Panelist in session "Save Our Bits: Approaches to Digital Preservation at TRLN Libraries." Triangle Research Libraries Network Annual Meeting, July 25, 2011, Chapel Hill, NC
Infusing Digital Curation Competencies into the SLIS CurriculumDigCurV
Presentation by Patricia C, Franks, School of Library & Information Science, San Jose State University at the DigCurV International Conference; Framing the digital curation curriculum
6-7 May, 2013
Florence, Rome
A presentation I gave on behalf of UKOLN - http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ - at the 'Doing Things Differently' event run by the RSP - http://www.rsp.ac.uk/ . The presentation looked at where institutional repositories might go in the future, the practical and the dream scenarios.
A presentation to accompany a workshop I ran on behalf of UKOLN - http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ - , University of Bath, at the Repositories Support Project Winter School in 2009 - http://www.rsp.ac.uk/. The workshop was designed to give repository managers an introduction to metadata as it related to their work.
A presentation & workshop I devised and gave/ran for the RSP - http://www.rsp.ac.uk/ - in 2009, looking at the future developments that might happen within UK institutional repositories. The event was held at the University of Bath.
Jabes 2008 - Conférence inaugurale, la grande révélation : penser les ressour...ABES
Jabes 2008 - conférence inaugurale, la grande révélation : penser les ressources de la bibliothèque à l'échelle du web - Lorcan Dempsey, dans le cadre des Journées Abes 2008
This presentation was given as a part of the NISO Standards Update session at ALA Annual Meeting 2016. The session was scheduled for Sunday, June 26, and the presenter was Diane Hillman of Metadata Management Associates.
Developing repository services using University of East London as a case study. Presentation to CDP25 event "Facilitating access to research: managing the institutional repository", 23 March 2015.
The theme of this presentation for ALIA Schools is 21st century resourcing and the principles of maintenance and development of a digital collection in the school library.
A collaborative approach to "filling the digital preservation gap" for Resear...Jenny Mitcham
A presentation given by Chris Awre, Jenny Mitcham and Sarah Romkey at RDMF14 (the DCC's Research Data Management Forum) on 9th November 2015 in York. It describes work underway in the "Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" project using Archivematica to preserve research data
Levels of Service for Digital LibrariesGreg Colati
Looking at data management from the perspective of data characteristics instead of the applications or systems that create and manage data. This is a presentation given as a discussion stater at the internal UConn Library management group meeting in April 2017
A presentation I gave on behalf of UKOLN - http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ - at the 'Doing Things Differently' event run by the RSP - http://www.rsp.ac.uk/ . The presentation looked at where institutional repositories might go in the future, the practical and the dream scenarios.
A presentation to accompany a workshop I ran on behalf of UKOLN - http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ - , University of Bath, at the Repositories Support Project Winter School in 2009 - http://www.rsp.ac.uk/. The workshop was designed to give repository managers an introduction to metadata as it related to their work.
A presentation & workshop I devised and gave/ran for the RSP - http://www.rsp.ac.uk/ - in 2009, looking at the future developments that might happen within UK institutional repositories. The event was held at the University of Bath.
Jabes 2008 - Conférence inaugurale, la grande révélation : penser les ressour...ABES
Jabes 2008 - conférence inaugurale, la grande révélation : penser les ressources de la bibliothèque à l'échelle du web - Lorcan Dempsey, dans le cadre des Journées Abes 2008
This presentation was given as a part of the NISO Standards Update session at ALA Annual Meeting 2016. The session was scheduled for Sunday, June 26, and the presenter was Diane Hillman of Metadata Management Associates.
Developing repository services using University of East London as a case study. Presentation to CDP25 event "Facilitating access to research: managing the institutional repository", 23 March 2015.
The theme of this presentation for ALIA Schools is 21st century resourcing and the principles of maintenance and development of a digital collection in the school library.
A collaborative approach to "filling the digital preservation gap" for Resear...Jenny Mitcham
A presentation given by Chris Awre, Jenny Mitcham and Sarah Romkey at RDMF14 (the DCC's Research Data Management Forum) on 9th November 2015 in York. It describes work underway in the "Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" project using Archivematica to preserve research data
Levels of Service for Digital LibrariesGreg Colati
Looking at data management from the perspective of data characteristics instead of the applications or systems that create and manage data. This is a presentation given as a discussion stater at the internal UConn Library management group meeting in April 2017
"Filling the digital preservation gap" with ArchivematicaJenny Mitcham
A presentation given by Jenny Mitcham at the iPRES conference on 6th November 2015 in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. It describes work underway in the "Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" project using Archivematica to preserve research data
(Nov 2008) Preparing Future Digital CuratorsCarolyn Hank
Event: Practical Applications of Digital Curation Education panel at the Fall 2008 Meeting of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Archives Conference, Silver Spring, MD, November 7, 2008. With Helen R. Tibbo, Sayeed Choudhury, and Kenneth Thibodeau
Capture All the URLs: First Steps in Web ArchivingKristen Yarmey
Presentation for a Society of American Archivists Web Archiving Roundtable professional development webinar.
Session Description:
Two co-authors, Alexis Antracoli, Records Management Archivist at Drexel University and Kristen Yarmey, Associate Professor and Digital Services Librarian at the University of
Scranton will share their experiences and engage in discussion about their web archiving projects. The work they will be talking about is covered in “Capture All the URLs: First Steps in Web Archiving” (http://palrap.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/palrap/article/view/67).
Kristen will discuss her and her colleagues’ first steps in web archiving at the University of Scranton, including making the case to campus stakeholders, finding funding, choosing Archive-It as well as selecting content and seeds to capture. Alexis will talk about establishing policies and implementing QA procedures. Both Alexis and Kristen will provide
insights on stumbling blocks, lessons learned, and future plans. Plenty of time will be allotted for questions and discussion.
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 1: Knowledge Futures: Digital Preservation Planning
Webinar 2: Preservation Planning Success Stories
Curated by Liz Bishoff
Presentation Slides
PIDs, Data and Software: How Libraries Can Support Researchers in an Evolving...Sarah Anna Stewart
Presentation given at the M25 Consortium of Academic Libraries, CPD25 Event on 'The Role of the Library in Supporting Research'. Provides an introduction to data, software and PIDs and a brief look at how libraries can enable researchers to gain impact and credit for their research data and software.
Presentation by Stuart Lewis of the University of Edinburgh. It was presented at the LSHTM Research Data Services workshop on June 30th 2015, an event organised to mark the end of LSHTM's Wellcome Trust funded RDM project.
"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with ArchivematicaJenny Mitcham
A webinar given by Jenny Mitcham and Simon Wilson to Digital Preservation Coalition members on 25th November 2015. It describes work underway in the "Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" project using Archivematica to preserve research data
This was a presentation for the Connecticut Library Association 2016. It introduces how the Connecticut Digital Archive came to be, the challenges of the CTDA and how it is moving forward.
Similar to What goes where? Bringing a new repository online at the Ohio State University Libraries (20)
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
What goes where? Bringing a new repository online at the Ohio State University Libraries
1. What goes where?
Bringing a new repository
online at the Ohio State
University Libraries
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
3. 3
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2012). Reference Model
for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Washington, DC: CCSDS
Secretariat
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
5. 5
Nancy Y. McGovern. “A Digital Decade: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going in Digital
Preservation?” RLG DigiNews, April 15, 2007.
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/60441/McGovern-
Digital_Decade.html?sequence=4.
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
6. 6
The Five Organizational Stages of Digital Preservation
Acknowledge: Understanding that digital preservation is a
local concern;
Act: Initiating digital preservation projects;
Consolidate: Seguing from projects to programs;
Institutionalize: Incorporating the larger environment; and
Externalize: Embracing inter-institutional collaboration and
dependency.
Kenney, Anne R. and Nancy Y. McGovern. “The Five Organizational Stages of Digital Preservation” in
Hodges, Patricia, ed. Digital Libraries: A Vision for the 21st Century: A Festschrift in Honor of Wendy
Lougee on the Occasion of Her Departure from the University of Michigan. Michigan Publishing, University
of Michigan Library, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.bbv9812.0001.001.
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
14. 14
Digital Preservation Policy Framework
Purpose
Objectives
Mandate
Scope
Challenges
Principles
Standards
Categories of Commitment
Levels of Preservation
Roles and Responsibilities
Collaboration/Cooperation
Access and Use
Implementation
Review Cycle
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
15. 15
Strategies for Digital Initiatives Working Group
• Charged with broad responsibility in crafting the Libraries’ policies and
infrastructure to support the Libraries’ strategic vision around digital initiatives
aligned with the Libraries’ collections, preservation priorities and information
technology infrastructure.
• The Group will consider and provide recommendations and guidance on:
• Policy development
• Interoperability and standards
• IT architecture
• Asset management
• Workflow development
• Information sharing/education within the Libraries
Membership
Head, Digital Initiatives (Chair)
Head, Thompson Library Special Collections
Head, Digital Content Services
Head, Special Collections Description and Access
Head, Application Development and Support
Head, Research Services
Head, Preservation and Reformatting
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
16. 16
White Paper: “Implementation of a Modern Digital Library at the
Ohio State University Libraries” – Guiding Principles
1. We build services not products
2. We carefully weigh when to build vs. buy vs. borrow
3. We develop modular services, not monolithic systems
4. We develop for change
5. We don’t keep everything forever
6. We build in assessment
7. We focus on the user
8. We work with partners, not customers
9. We embrace research as a core, fundamental value
10.We strive to stay grounded in the real world
11.We are driven by standards
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
17. 17
Master Objects Repository Task Force (2014)
“ first steps in realizing the recommendations laid out in the Ohio State University
Libraries (OSUL) Digital Preservation PolicyFramework, moving beyond the
theoretical discussion and laying out specific definitions and practices around the
management of digital assets within the Libraries’ storage environment.”
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
18. 18
Object Type Lifecycle
Preservation Master:
The original digital object and/or the rendering of a digital file that best supports the
preservation provenance and authenticity of the information and essence of the digital object
Permanent
Provisional Master:
The original digital object and/or the rendering of a digital file that has not been captured
utilizing one of the content formats identified for long-term preservation. Ideally, these items will
largely be from legacy collections with assets digitized primarily for access or to reduce
handling of specific objects. The materials have been digitized with an intention to replace
these objects with appropriate preservation ready copies.
Until superseded by an
appropriate preservation master
Derived Master:
A high quality derivative created from a preservation master that is utilized to create access
copies; further, the effort to create the derivative is resource intensive enough to warrant
preserving the file.
Conditional: to be disposed
when a more effective means of
creating access copies is
identified
Working Copy:
A copy or high quality derivative of a preservation master that is utilized to create access copies
and will be disposed of once the access copies are complete and placed in an appropriate
access system.
Maintain while creating access
copies; dispose once access
copies/project has been vetted
Access Copy:
A derivative–typically of lower quality–created from a derived master or working copy that is
intended for consumption by our patrons and/or the public.
Life of project; archival review
of project
Reproduction Copy:
A high quality derivative that is distributed to a consumer/patron for their personal re-use and
may be stored on shared drive or other designated area, for ease of access.
Conditional: to be disposed
when a more effective means of
providing re-use copies is
identified
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
20. 20
Digital Content Management Workflows Task Force (2015)
• Charged with developing a disposition matrix and workflow recommendations detailing how
digital objects will move into the Libraries’ for management and preservation
Digital Preservation Task Force (2015)
• Charged with developing a long-term management / preservation plan for the Libraries’
master digital objects, including:
• A detailed environmental scan of the services currently used to provide digital
preservation services for the Libraries
• Identification of additional local and external services currently available to and/or
supported by the Libraries
• Recommendations for systematically managing the preservation of digital master
objects
• Recommendations detailing:
• What content the Libraries will preserve internally and in what repository
• What external services the Libraries will use and for what types of content
• Plans for the migration of existing content into appropriate services
• An outline of cost and staffing considerations for each recommended repository /
service (i.e.cost per TB of content, internal infrastructure costs, staff time
considerations, etc.)
Emily Frieda Shaw
Preservation and Reformatting
University Libraries
For years I dreamed of participating in the development of a trusted digital repository. I completed coursework toward a Certificate of Advanced Study in digital libraries, to learn about the theory and practice of digital preservation, databases and information processing, metadata, data curation and management, analysis and design of information systems.
I pinned a copy of the OAIS reference model to my cubicle and would regularly refer to it when graduate students asked me “so, what do you do?” Well, I am trying to do THIS!
I joined the National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) and participated in monthly calls with several working groups, listening intently and engaging with colleagues who manage preservation repositories in other institutions, and taking what incremental steps I could to better manage and preserve my organization’s digital collections in the absence of such a repository.
I attended Nancy McGovern’s Digital Preservation Management workshop and looked forward to the day when I might be able to sit comfortably upon a sturdy, level 3-legged stool.
But it takes both time and considerable organizational volition to move beyond acknowledging the importance of digital preservation and taking some action steps on specific projects (Stages 1 and 2 in Kenny & McGovern’s Five Organizational Stage of Digital Preservation”), and toward consolidation, institutionalization, and externalization.
So when I came to The Ohio State University Libraries in August of 2014, I was delighted to be joining an organization where the commitment had been made, many of the necessary resources had been committed, and the technology was under development. In other words, consolidation was well under way, and given my role as Preservation Administrator and my knowledge and experience with digital preservation, I would be intimately involved in the process of institutionalizing and externalizing my new organization’s efforts to more responsibly manage, preserve and make our digital collections broadly discoverable and accessible.
I am always eager to hear about how colleagues in other organizations are managing their collections (physical and digital), and so I am here today to tell you a bit about how we’re doing this at Ohio State. The title of my talk today is “what goes where?”, which includes the equally important questions of “who decides?” and “how?”. While we don’t have the answers to all of these questions yet, I’ll be talking about how we go to where we are now, and where we’re going in the future.
Like many of our peers, the OSU Libraries did not enter the digital collections sphere with a coherent strategy and an interoperable, standards-compliant, community-supported technology stack ready to support long-term management and access from the get-go. Neither did the Libraries have clear guidelines for preservation reformatting or requirements for metadata – manually or automatically created, or transformed from other formats – to support discovery. Rather, out of necessity, several different platforms were used.
For example… MediaManager for image collections from the Byrd Polar Research Center Archives…
…and the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library and Museum.
Boutique digital collections, custom build around digital images of special collections
And the OSU Knowledge Bank, our Institutional Repository, built on the Dspace platform and expertly managed since 2004. We have the “KB” to manage and make accessible digital content of all sorts: journals and articles, reports and data sets, digitized manuscripts and image slides. Despite our geographic proximity to OCLC, we never adopted CONTENTdm
We also had somewhere between 30 and 50 TB of high-resolution tiffs (after a significant de-duplication effort), some with and some without associated metadata, stored on an FTP server we called the “dark archive” and scattered throughout dozens of directories on the Libraries’ shared drive, as well as on external media like hard drives, flashdrives, and CDs and DVDs. We are still getting our heads around the extent of this content, what it is and where. We had (and still have) digital collection material in more than a dozen different systems.
The critical first step in OSUL’s journey down the road to becoming, as an organization, a Trusted Digital Repository, with the capacity and capability to actively contribute to a more secure, vibrant, and interconnected global digital library began with a Digital Preservation Policy Framework (https://library.osu.edu/document-registry/docs/260).
Purpose: “formalize The Ohio State University Libraries continuing commitment to the long-term stewardship, preservation of and sustainable access to its diverse and extensive range of digital assets…and make explicit the OSUL’s long-term commitment to The Ohio State University community as its trusted digital repository.”
This 12-page document addresses purpose, mandate, scope, challenges, principles, standards, levels of preservation, roles and responsibilities, and so on.
Strategies for Digital Initiatives Working Group charge: https://library.osu.edu/document-registry/docs/351
In 2012, as a new leadership team began to gel within the Libraries (and 2 years before I came to OSU) my colleague, Terry Reese, was hired as the Head of Digital Initiatives, and soon thereafter convened a Strategies for Digital Initiatives Working Group (SDIWG).
“Charged with broad responsibilities for crafting the Libraries’ policies and infrastructure to support the Libraries strategic vision around digital initiatives aligned with the Libraries’ collections, preservation priorities and information technologies”
This working group, comprised of mid-level leadership from across the organization, has had a busy couple of years whittling the organizational leg of the 3-legged stool, crafting policy, normalizing language, recommending technology, and developing workflows.
About a year after the Digital Preservation Policy Framework document, the newly-formed SDWIG wrote a White Paper entitled “Implementation of a Modern Digital Library at the Ohio State University Libraries” (https://library.osu.edu/document-registry/docs/591)
Whereas the Policy Framework articulated the scope of our organizational commitment to digital preservation, the White Paper began to build the scaffolding that would guide the Digital Initiatives program, and make some recommendations to help with prioritizing development within our IT department.
The White Paper said:
“In many ways, understanding and adapting to the technical challenges raised as part of the digital libraries retooling effort will be the easy part of any transition. The more difficult part of this process will be facilitating a cultural change within the OSUL. “
It also includes a set of Guiding Principles that undergird the thoughtful development of OSUL’s digital libraries program
In the year after the White Paper was finished, a Task Force convened and was charged with defining the “environment and high-level management processes for a Master Objects Repository (MOR) in the Libraries’ digital storage system”, along with procedures for deposit and registration of appropriate objects.
Master Objects Repository Task Force Report: https://library.osu.edu/document-registry/docs/401
The MOR Task Force also did some critical work around normalizing language around the digital objects under our stewardship. The MOR report includes definitions of different object types.
Credit to Terry Reese for this graphic, depicting a 4-year development cycle:
Digital Preservation Policy Framework (https://library.osu.edu/document-registry/docs/260)
Year 1 (2013) – learning the landscape, understanding the gaps
White Paper – “Implementation of a Modern Digital Library at the Ohio State University Libraries” (https://library.osu.edu/document-registry/docs/591)
Year 2 (2014)
Master Objects Repository Task Force (https://library.osu.edu/document-registry/docs/591)
Year 3 (2015)
Digital Content Management Workflows Task Force, and Digital Preservation Task Force (both in progress)
In careful consideration of the Guiding Principles defined in the White Paper, one of the key recommendations of the final report created by the Master Objects Repository Task Force was to adopt the Fedora architecture as the basis for the Libraries’ “modern digital library”. This recommendation was approved, and Fedora was installed in 2014. But installing Fedora is not the same as brining a new repository online; many decisions must still be made.
And so that brings us to our current work, and the title of my presentation: What goes where? How does it get there, and who decides? When I proposed this talk, I thought we might have been somewhat further along in our recommendations by the time I actually delivered this presentation; but the work of these Task Forces has proved to be very challenging, both intellectually and logistically, as it involves a large stakeholder group and decisions that span many different technologies, platforms, departments and workflows. The disposition matrices and workflow models developed by these task forces will be used to prioritize migration of content, the development of new infrastructure tools, and decisions about the long-term preservation of content in the new Fedora infrastructure, our Dsapce repository (the Knowledge Bank), and in other systems.
The second half of year 3 and year 4 will see OSU’s “modern digital library” more fully realized and incorporated into digital reformatting, archiving and curation workflows. We will continue to present, publish and otherwise engage with colleagues who are at various stages in their efforts to become trusted digital repositories.