Week 9 Assignment 3 Submission The final project includes submissions from your prior assignments. The previous submissions must be revised based on instructor feedback and recommendations. Review the paper for flow and continuity. Note: The cover, abstract and reference pages do not count toward the final page number. The total page count should be fifteen to twenty (15-20) pages. Compile the previous assignments and: Create a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final project.  Revise your project analysis.  Revise your instructional and delivery strategies.  Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you: Create an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Specify the measures that best fit each objective.   Prepare a five (5) question test that correlates with the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Design the test so that each question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.  Determine the type of evaluation approach that is most appropriate for your project. Provide a rationale for your selection.  Select a learning theory that applies to the instructional design of the project. Provide a rationale for your selection.  Create three (3) learning theory principles, not previously mentioned, and specify how they apply to your project.  Examine the information gaps within the project. Determine the information that is necessary in order to complete the project more effectively. Provide a rationale for your response.  Specify the next steps to complete the delivery of the instruction. Identify final preparations needed such as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.   Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.  Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Analyze theories and models of instructional design in relation to learner and program needs.  Assess instructional and training products.  Write clearly and concisely about issues in instructional design and development using proper writing mechanics.   Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 260 Assignment 3: Final Project Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A Compile the previous assignments and: 1. Create a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for ...

1. Week 9 Assignment 3 Submission
The final project includes submissions from your prior
assignments. The previous submissions must be revised based
on instructor feedback and recommendations. Review the paper
for flow and continuity.
Note:
The cover, abstract and reference pages do not count toward
the final page number. The total page count should be fifteen to
twenty (15-20) pages.
Compile the previous assignments and:
Create a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final
project.
Revise your project analysis.
Revise your instructional and delivery strategies.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
Create an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three (3)
learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Specify the
measures that best fit each objective.
Prepare a five (5) question test that correlates with the learning
objectives from Assignment 1. Design the test so that each
question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

2. Determine the type of evaluation approach that is most
appropriate for your project. Provide a rationale for your
selection.
Select a learning theory that applies to the instructional design
of the project. Provide a rationale for your selection.
Create three (3) learning theory principles, not previously
mentioned, and specify how they apply to your project.
Examine the information gaps within the project. Determine the
information that is necessary in order to complete the project
more effectively. Provide a rationale for your response.
Specify the next steps to complete the delivery of the
instruction. Identify final preparations needed such as the
location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size
12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references
must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the
student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the
date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in
the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this
assignment are:

3. Analyze theories and models of instructional design in relation
to learner and program needs.
Assess instructional and training products.
Write clearly and concisely about issues in instructional design
and development using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality,
logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing
skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 260
Assignment 3: Final Project
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C

4. Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
Compile the previous assignments and:
1. Create a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final
project.
Weight: 5%
Did not submit or incompletely created a quarter-page (1/4)
informative abstract for your final project.
Partially created a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for
your final project.
Satisfactorily created a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract
for your final project.
Thoroughly created a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for
your final project.

5. 2. Revise your project analysis.
Weight: 5%
Did not submit or incompletely revised your project analysis.
Partially revised your project analysis.
Satisfactorily revised your project analysis.
Thoroughly revised your project analysis.
3. Revise your instructional and delivery strategies.
Weight: 5%
Did not submit or incompletely revised your instructional and
delivery strategies.
Partially revised your instructional and delivery strategies.
Satisfactorily revised your instructional and delivery strategies.

6. Thoroughly revised your instructional and delivery strategies.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
4. Create an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three
(3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Specify
the measures that best fit each objective.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely created an evaluation plan that
clearly correlates to the three (3) learning objectives you
developed in Assignment 1. Did not submit or incompletely
specified the measures that best fit each objective.
Partially created an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the
three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1.
Partially specified the measures that best fit each objective.
Satisfactorily created an evaluation plan that clearly correlates
to the three (3) learning objectives you developed in
Assignment 1. Satisfactorily specified the measures that best fit
each objective.
Thoroughly created an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to
the three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment
1. Thoroughly specified the measures that best fit each
objective.

7. 5. Prepare a five (5) question test that correlates with the
learning objectives from Assignment 1. Design the test so that
each question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely prepared a five (5) question test
that correlates with the learning objectives from Assignment 1.
Did not submit or incompletely designed the test so that each
question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Partially prepared a five (5) question test that correlates with
the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Partially designed
the test so that each question is from a different level of
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Satisfactorily prepared a five (5) question test that correlates
with the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Satisfactorily
designed the test so that each question is from a different level
of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Thoroughly prepared a five (5) question test that correlates with
the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Thoroughly
designed the test so that each question is from a different level
of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
6. Determine the type of evaluation approach that is most

8. appropriate for your project. Provide a rationale for your
selection.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely determined the type of
evaluation approach that is most appropriate for your project.
Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your
selection.
Partially determined the type of evaluation approach that is
most appropriate for your project. Partially provided a rationale
for your selection.
Satisfactorily determined the type of evaluation approach that is
most appropriate for your project. Satisfactorily provided a
rationale for your selection.
Thoroughly determined the type of evaluation approach that is
most appropriate for your project. Thoroughly provided a
rationale for your selection.
7. Select a learning theory that applies to the instructional
design of the project. Provide a rationale for your selection.
Weight: 5%
Did not submit or incompletely selected a learning theory that
applies to the instructional design of the project. Did not submit

9. or incompletely provided a rationale for your selection.
Partially selected a learning theory that applies to the
instructional design of the project. Partially provided a rationale
for your selection.
Satisfactorily selected a learning theory that applies to the
instructional design of the project. Satisfactorily provided a
rationale for your selection.
Thoroughly selected a learning theory that applies to the
instructional design of the project. Thoroughly provided a
rationale for your selection.
8. Create three (3) learning theory principles, not previously
mentioned, and specify how they apply to your project.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely created three (3) learning theory
principles, not previously mentioned, and did not submit or
incompletely specified how they apply to your project.
Partially created three (3) learning theory principles, not
previously mentioned, and partially specified how they apply to
your project.
Satisfactorily created three (3) learning theory principles, not

10. previously mentioned, and satisfactorily specified how they
apply to your project.
Thoroughly created three (3) learning theory principles, not
previously mentioned, and thoroughly specified how they apply
to your project.
9. Examine the information gaps within the project. Determine
the information that is necessary in order to complete the
project more effectively. Provide a rationale for your response.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely examined the information gaps
within the project. Did not submit or incompletely determined
the information that is necessary in order to complete the
project more effectively. Did not submit or incompletely
provided a rationale for your response.
Partially examined the information gaps within the project.
Partially information that is necessary in order to complete the
project more effectively. Partially provided a rationale for your
response.
Satisfactorily examined the information gaps within the project.
Satisfactorily information that is necessary in order to complete
the project more effectively. Satisfactorily provided a rationale
for your response.

11. Thoroughly examined the information gaps within the project.
Thoroughly information that is necessary in order to complete
the project more effectively. Thoroughly provided a rationale
for your response.
10. Specify the next steps to complete the delivery of the
instruction. Identify final preparations needed such as the
location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely specified the next steps to
complete the delivery of the instruction. Did not submit or
incompletely identified final preparations needed such as the
location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.
Partially specified the next steps to complete the delivery of the
instruction. Partially identified final preparations needed such
as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.
Satisfactorily specified the next steps to complete the delivery
of the instruction. Satisfactorily identified final preparations
needed such as the location, resources, equipment,
transportation and food.
Thoroughly specified the next steps to complete the delivery of
the instruction. Thoroughly identified final preparations needed
such as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and
food.

12. 11. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation,
or formatting.
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or
formatting.
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or
formatting.
Error free or almost error-free grammar, spelling, punctuation,
or formatting.
12. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference
section
Weight: 5%
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only
partially formatted correctly in APA style.

13. Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are
generally formatted correctly in APA style.
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error
free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
13. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional
or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of
quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques or
quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of
quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
14. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%

14. Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include
reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and
evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with
reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent
manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.