This webinar helps you understand how to overcome common TCFD implementation challenges and discover practical guidance and examples of good practice for disclosing climate-related financial information.
Speakers:
Youri Lie, Senior Manager, EY
Fiona Quinlan, Technical Manager, CDSB
Decoding the review of EU's Non-Financial Reporting DirectiveCDSB
Video: https://youtu.be/Y8lvZKmluMM
Companies in the European Union with over 500 employees are required to comply with the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and disclose non-financial information on environmental issues. However, reporting to date hasn’t been sufficient both in terms of quantity and quality, and the EU Green Deal has made it clear that environmental and climate disclosure must improve. As a result, the Commission is reviewing the Non-Financial Reporting Directive, with a public consultation underway until May 2020.
Should large companies and financial institutions expect major changes? Given the ambitious EU Green Deal commitments and the gaps in reporting to date, it certainly seems so.
CDSB's Managing Director, Mardi McBrien, EU Policy Officer at Frank Bold, Joanne Houston, and CDSB's Policy and External Affair Director, Michael Zimonyi, joined this special policy-driven webinar to address:
- what may likely change in terms of environmental and climate reporting;
- who may be affected and how;
- what didn’t work and why; and
- what needs to be improved for the Directive to deliver on its intended purpose.
Webinar slides: What does climate-related financial disclosure really look likeCDSB
This webinar helps you understand how to overcome common TCFD implementation challenges and discover practical guidance and examples of good practice for disclosing climate-related financial information.
Speakers:
Jane Thostrup Jagd, Lead Financial Consultation, Ørsted
Fiona Quinlan, Technical Manager, CDSB
How the new EU guidelines on reporting climate related information will impac...CDSB
As part of its Sustainable Finance Action Plan, the European Commission published new guidelines in June for reporting climate-related information. These guidelines were designed to provide practical recommendations and help companies report the impact of climate change on their business as well as the impact of their activities on the climate. CDSB and CDP present will the new guidelines and what it means for corporate reporting practices moving forward.
The building blocks for successful TCFD disclosure in conversation with Sue H...CDSB
To mark the launch of the building blocks guidance, this webinar focussed on trends in climate-related financial disclosure, key developments and how to use CDP disclosure and the CDSB Framework to satisfy the TCFD recommendations.
The building blocks for successful TCFD disclosure in conversation with Paul ...CDSB
To mark the launch of the building blocks guidance, this webinar focussed on trends in climate-related financial disclosure, key developments and how to use CDP disclosure and the CDSB Framework to satisfy the TCFD recommendations.
TCFD Implementation Webinar Series - Metrics and Targets with DanoneCDSB
This document summarizes a webinar on implementing the TCFD recommendations for climate-related financial disclosures. The webinar discusses metrics and targets, a core element of TCFD. It provides tips on disclosure including making qualitative and quantitative reports using existing standards and metrics. A representative from Danone discusses their process for implementing TCFD across strategic planning, operations, and finance to identify risks and opportunities and set targets.
What You Need to Know: The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive and what its ...CDSB
Speakers: Michael Zimonyi, Policy & External Affairs Director and Nontokozo Khumalo, Corporate Engagement Manager at CDSB.
The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) came into effect in 2018 and requires listed companies and other public interest entities to disclose information on the way they operate and how they manage social and environmental challenges. In June 2019 the European Commission published guidelines on reporting climate-related information which included the integration of the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. These guidelines supplement the existing Non-Financial Reporting Guidelines released in 2017.
The EU is now set to publish a fitness check of corporate reporting to assess the appropriateness of existing legislation, with a special focus on NFRD, giving way to a possibility of a reopening of the current regulation. In advance of these updates, there is a tremendous opportunity for companies to get ahead of the curve to ensure that they are complying with the EU reporting guidelines and prepared for potential new regulations.
During this webinar briefing, you’ll gain insight into:
Current requirements of the NFR Directive and Guidelines;
The state of corporate climate change reporting;
Potential impacts of a reopened NFR Directive and CDSB’s expectations going forward.
Created by the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the TCFD Good Practice Handbook offers real-world examples of TCFD aligned disclosures in mainstream reports across many G20 countries. Striking a balance between financial and non-financial sectors, the Handbook helps you understand how organisations in your industry are implementing the TCFD recommendations and provide insight into good practice techniques to enhance your own climate-related financial disclosures.
Decoding the review of EU's Non-Financial Reporting DirectiveCDSB
Video: https://youtu.be/Y8lvZKmluMM
Companies in the European Union with over 500 employees are required to comply with the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and disclose non-financial information on environmental issues. However, reporting to date hasn’t been sufficient both in terms of quantity and quality, and the EU Green Deal has made it clear that environmental and climate disclosure must improve. As a result, the Commission is reviewing the Non-Financial Reporting Directive, with a public consultation underway until May 2020.
Should large companies and financial institutions expect major changes? Given the ambitious EU Green Deal commitments and the gaps in reporting to date, it certainly seems so.
CDSB's Managing Director, Mardi McBrien, EU Policy Officer at Frank Bold, Joanne Houston, and CDSB's Policy and External Affair Director, Michael Zimonyi, joined this special policy-driven webinar to address:
- what may likely change in terms of environmental and climate reporting;
- who may be affected and how;
- what didn’t work and why; and
- what needs to be improved for the Directive to deliver on its intended purpose.
Webinar slides: What does climate-related financial disclosure really look likeCDSB
This webinar helps you understand how to overcome common TCFD implementation challenges and discover practical guidance and examples of good practice for disclosing climate-related financial information.
Speakers:
Jane Thostrup Jagd, Lead Financial Consultation, Ørsted
Fiona Quinlan, Technical Manager, CDSB
How the new EU guidelines on reporting climate related information will impac...CDSB
As part of its Sustainable Finance Action Plan, the European Commission published new guidelines in June for reporting climate-related information. These guidelines were designed to provide practical recommendations and help companies report the impact of climate change on their business as well as the impact of their activities on the climate. CDSB and CDP present will the new guidelines and what it means for corporate reporting practices moving forward.
The building blocks for successful TCFD disclosure in conversation with Sue H...CDSB
To mark the launch of the building blocks guidance, this webinar focussed on trends in climate-related financial disclosure, key developments and how to use CDP disclosure and the CDSB Framework to satisfy the TCFD recommendations.
The building blocks for successful TCFD disclosure in conversation with Paul ...CDSB
To mark the launch of the building blocks guidance, this webinar focussed on trends in climate-related financial disclosure, key developments and how to use CDP disclosure and the CDSB Framework to satisfy the TCFD recommendations.
TCFD Implementation Webinar Series - Metrics and Targets with DanoneCDSB
This document summarizes a webinar on implementing the TCFD recommendations for climate-related financial disclosures. The webinar discusses metrics and targets, a core element of TCFD. It provides tips on disclosure including making qualitative and quantitative reports using existing standards and metrics. A representative from Danone discusses their process for implementing TCFD across strategic planning, operations, and finance to identify risks and opportunities and set targets.
What You Need to Know: The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive and what its ...CDSB
Speakers: Michael Zimonyi, Policy & External Affairs Director and Nontokozo Khumalo, Corporate Engagement Manager at CDSB.
The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) came into effect in 2018 and requires listed companies and other public interest entities to disclose information on the way they operate and how they manage social and environmental challenges. In June 2019 the European Commission published guidelines on reporting climate-related information which included the integration of the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. These guidelines supplement the existing Non-Financial Reporting Guidelines released in 2017.
The EU is now set to publish a fitness check of corporate reporting to assess the appropriateness of existing legislation, with a special focus on NFRD, giving way to a possibility of a reopening of the current regulation. In advance of these updates, there is a tremendous opportunity for companies to get ahead of the curve to ensure that they are complying with the EU reporting guidelines and prepared for potential new regulations.
During this webinar briefing, you’ll gain insight into:
Current requirements of the NFR Directive and Guidelines;
The state of corporate climate change reporting;
Potential impacts of a reopened NFR Directive and CDSB’s expectations going forward.
Created by the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the TCFD Good Practice Handbook offers real-world examples of TCFD aligned disclosures in mainstream reports across many G20 countries. Striking a balance between financial and non-financial sectors, the Handbook helps you understand how organisations in your industry are implementing the TCFD recommendations and provide insight into good practice techniques to enhance your own climate-related financial disclosures.
Corporate climate & environmental disclosure under the EU Non-Financial Repor...CDSB
Find out more at https://www.cdsb.net/NFRreview
Following the first year of reporting under the EU Non-Financial Information Directive (2014/95/EU), CDSB and CDP conducted a review of corporate disclosure of climate change and environmental information across Europe.
Perché e come rendicontare e comunicare le informazioni finanziarie relative a clima e ambiente - pratiche correnti, buone pratiche, risorse e consigli.
This document provides an agenda and summary of a workshop on climate-related disclosures presented by Wendy McGuinness. The agenda includes sections on why climate intelligence is important, what is happening nationally and globally regarding climate policy and regulations, and how companies can make climate-related disclosures. Under the "What" section, recent developments in New Zealand and globally are summarized, including new standards from the XRB, NZX, FMA, and initiatives like the ISSB and GFANZ. The "How" section outlines what organizations are required to disclose based on size, and provides examples of frameworks and scenarios that can be used to guide disclosures.
Presentation by Robert Bradley, NDC Partnership, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Jose Luis Blasco Session 2B Research Collaborative workshop 2020 CGFI ForumOECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 2.B - José Luis Blasco, Director, Global Sustainability, ACCIONA
Padraig Oliver UNFCCC Session 1A Research Collaborative workshop 2020 CGFI F...OECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 1.A - Padraig Oliver, Programme Officer, Climate Finance, UNFCCC.
James Mitchell Rocky Mountain Institute Session 1A Research Collaborative wor...OECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 1.A - James Mitchell, Director - Center for Climate-Aligned Finance, Rocky Mountain Institute.
Alignment to Advance Climate-Resilient Development: An IntroductionNAP Global Network
Presentation by Anika Terton, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Tool for Assessing Adaptation in the NDCs (TAAN): Tracking and analysing adap...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Na-Hyeon Shin, GIZ, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Presentation by Anika Terton, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Alexander Dobrinevski Session 2B Research Collaborative workshop 2020 CGFI ForumOECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 2.B - Alexander Dobrinevski, Senior Analyst, Environmental Finance, OECD
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG2 Potential Role of the Facilitative Dialogue...OECD Environment
This document discusses how a facilitative dialogue could help parties progress toward the goals of the Paris Agreement. It suggests the dialogue assess: (1) current emissions and progress, (2) the scale of emissions reductions needed to limit warming to 1.5C and associated timelines, and (3) effective policies and technologies. Inputs from the UNFCCC, IPCC, and other scientific bodies could help with these assessments. The dialogue could identify information gaps in NDCs and recommend additional data. It could produce summary reports highlighting progress, emissions gaps, and priority actions. Parties could then adopt a decision identifying milestones to achieve 1.5C warming. The dialogue would involve both technical and political elements across SB, intersession
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group A and B summary slidesOECD Environment
There are benefits to tracking national progress on climate change adaptation through monitoring and evaluation (M&E). M&E systems can facilitate mainstreaming adaptation efforts and prioritizing spending, though balancing standardized indicators with context is important. Tracking inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes provides information but can be data and resource intensive. The purpose of M&E should be learning rather than just indicators. Aggregating local and sub-national adaptation progress to the national and global level is challenging but not straightforward. Stakeholder buy-in and clear responsibilities are also critical for effective M&E.
Nathan Fabian UN PRI Session 1B Research Collaborative workshop 2020 CGFI Forum OECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 1.B - Nathan Fabian, Chief Responsible Investment Officer, UN PRI.
The document provides an overview of key statistics and results from GRESB 2020. Participation in GRESB increased by 22% worldwide and 24% in Europe, with over 1,200 participants representing $4.8 trillion in assets. The 2020 assessment included changes such as removing some indicators, reweighting components, adding new indicators on health/well-being and grievance mechanisms, and led to net ESG improvements. Going forward, GRESB aims to strengthen governance, increase industry collaboration, define performance metrics, and integrate climate risk and resilience into future assessments.
Role of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process in NDC implementationNAP Global Network
Presentation by Anne Hammill, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Tracking climate-related finance in Zambia, Mr. David Kaluba, National Climate Change Secretariat, Ministry of Finance, Zambia (joining by video conference)
Support climate mitigation outcomes through international co-ordination on ca...OECD Environment
Simon Buckle from the OECD presented on supporting regional cooperation on carbon pricing. He discussed (1) findings from past OECD work on why carbon pricing is essential but not widely implemented and how to overcome barriers, (2) potential future work modeling efficiency gains of regional carbon pricing initiatives and relationships between national and sub-national climate actions, and (3) obtaining member input on activities, meetings, resources, and deliverable timings for this work. The presentation aimed to discuss ways to broaden carbon pricing coverage, increase price levels and coherence through international coordination.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Advancing nature-related financial disclosure at scaleCDSB
With momentum building for climate-related financial disclosure, there is a growing imperative for environmental issues to be reported in an integrated way. CDSB has launched an open, public consultation to advance the disclosure of nature-related financial information in the mainstream report and explore the role of the CDSB Framework in this process. This webinar explores the consultation in more detail and outlines how to participate. Submit your response: www.cdsb.net/consultation
TCFD implementation webinar series - risk management with HSBC - AMCDSB
The document is a transcript from a webinar about implementing the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. It includes discussions on understanding the TCFD recommendations, what companies are currently doing with disclosure, tips for effective disclosure implementation, and a presentation from HSBC on how they are embedding sustainability into their strategy and disclosing climate-related financial risks. The webinar covered key elements of the TCFD framework like governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.
Corporate climate & environmental disclosure under the EU Non-Financial Repor...CDSB
Find out more at https://www.cdsb.net/NFRreview
Following the first year of reporting under the EU Non-Financial Information Directive (2014/95/EU), CDSB and CDP conducted a review of corporate disclosure of climate change and environmental information across Europe.
Perché e come rendicontare e comunicare le informazioni finanziarie relative a clima e ambiente - pratiche correnti, buone pratiche, risorse e consigli.
This document provides an agenda and summary of a workshop on climate-related disclosures presented by Wendy McGuinness. The agenda includes sections on why climate intelligence is important, what is happening nationally and globally regarding climate policy and regulations, and how companies can make climate-related disclosures. Under the "What" section, recent developments in New Zealand and globally are summarized, including new standards from the XRB, NZX, FMA, and initiatives like the ISSB and GFANZ. The "How" section outlines what organizations are required to disclose based on size, and provides examples of frameworks and scenarios that can be used to guide disclosures.
Presentation by Robert Bradley, NDC Partnership, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Jose Luis Blasco Session 2B Research Collaborative workshop 2020 CGFI ForumOECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 2.B - José Luis Blasco, Director, Global Sustainability, ACCIONA
Padraig Oliver UNFCCC Session 1A Research Collaborative workshop 2020 CGFI F...OECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 1.A - Padraig Oliver, Programme Officer, Climate Finance, UNFCCC.
James Mitchell Rocky Mountain Institute Session 1A Research Collaborative wor...OECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 1.A - James Mitchell, Director - Center for Climate-Aligned Finance, Rocky Mountain Institute.
Alignment to Advance Climate-Resilient Development: An IntroductionNAP Global Network
Presentation by Anika Terton, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Tool for Assessing Adaptation in the NDCs (TAAN): Tracking and analysing adap...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Na-Hyeon Shin, GIZ, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Presentation by Anika Terton, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Alexander Dobrinevski Session 2B Research Collaborative workshop 2020 CGFI ForumOECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 2.B - Alexander Dobrinevski, Senior Analyst, Environmental Finance, OECD
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG2 Potential Role of the Facilitative Dialogue...OECD Environment
This document discusses how a facilitative dialogue could help parties progress toward the goals of the Paris Agreement. It suggests the dialogue assess: (1) current emissions and progress, (2) the scale of emissions reductions needed to limit warming to 1.5C and associated timelines, and (3) effective policies and technologies. Inputs from the UNFCCC, IPCC, and other scientific bodies could help with these assessments. The dialogue could identify information gaps in NDCs and recommend additional data. It could produce summary reports highlighting progress, emissions gaps, and priority actions. Parties could then adopt a decision identifying milestones to achieve 1.5C warming. The dialogue would involve both technical and political elements across SB, intersession
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group A and B summary slidesOECD Environment
There are benefits to tracking national progress on climate change adaptation through monitoring and evaluation (M&E). M&E systems can facilitate mainstreaming adaptation efforts and prioritizing spending, though balancing standardized indicators with context is important. Tracking inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes provides information but can be data and resource intensive. The purpose of M&E should be learning rather than just indicators. Aggregating local and sub-national adaptation progress to the national and global level is challenging but not straightforward. Stakeholder buy-in and clear responsibilities are also critical for effective M&E.
Nathan Fabian UN PRI Session 1B Research Collaborative workshop 2020 CGFI Forum OECD Environment
Research Collaborative Workshop on measuring the alignment of investments and financing with climate objectives, 7th OECD Forum on Green Finance and Investment (6-9 October, 2020) – Session 1.B - Nathan Fabian, Chief Responsible Investment Officer, UN PRI.
The document provides an overview of key statistics and results from GRESB 2020. Participation in GRESB increased by 22% worldwide and 24% in Europe, with over 1,200 participants representing $4.8 trillion in assets. The 2020 assessment included changes such as removing some indicators, reweighting components, adding new indicators on health/well-being and grievance mechanisms, and led to net ESG improvements. Going forward, GRESB aims to strengthen governance, increase industry collaboration, define performance metrics, and integrate climate risk and resilience into future assessments.
Role of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process in NDC implementationNAP Global Network
Presentation by Anne Hammill, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Tracking climate-related finance in Zambia, Mr. David Kaluba, National Climate Change Secretariat, Ministry of Finance, Zambia (joining by video conference)
Support climate mitigation outcomes through international co-ordination on ca...OECD Environment
Simon Buckle from the OECD presented on supporting regional cooperation on carbon pricing. He discussed (1) findings from past OECD work on why carbon pricing is essential but not widely implemented and how to overcome barriers, (2) potential future work modeling efficiency gains of regional carbon pricing initiatives and relationships between national and sub-national climate actions, and (3) obtaining member input on activities, meetings, resources, and deliverable timings for this work. The presentation aimed to discuss ways to broaden carbon pricing coverage, increase price levels and coherence through international coordination.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Advancing nature-related financial disclosure at scaleCDSB
With momentum building for climate-related financial disclosure, there is a growing imperative for environmental issues to be reported in an integrated way. CDSB has launched an open, public consultation to advance the disclosure of nature-related financial information in the mainstream report and explore the role of the CDSB Framework in this process. This webinar explores the consultation in more detail and outlines how to participate. Submit your response: www.cdsb.net/consultation
TCFD implementation webinar series - risk management with HSBC - AMCDSB
The document is a transcript from a webinar about implementing the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. It includes discussions on understanding the TCFD recommendations, what companies are currently doing with disclosure, tips for effective disclosure implementation, and a presentation from HSBC on how they are embedding sustainability into their strategy and disclosing climate-related financial risks. The webinar covered key elements of the TCFD framework like governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.
TCFD implementation webinar series - strategy with UnileverCDSB
Many organisations currently face impacts from climate-related issues, with important implications for businesses, strategy, and financial planning. Improved disclosures on current and anticipated risks and opportunities can enhance an investors’ understanding of how strategic functions are likely to be impacted over the short, medium, and long terms. This presentation by CDSB and Unilever offers insight into the principles for effective strategy disclosure and what good practice looks like. Visit www.cdsb.net for more information.
TCFD implementation webinar series - risk management with HSBCCDSB
The document is a transcript from a webinar on TCFD implementation. It discusses:
1) An introduction to the TCFD recommendations and why they were developed, focusing on the lack of consistent climate-related financial disclosures.
2) A status report on TCFD implementation by companies that found disclosure has increased but is still limited, and more clarity is needed on financial impacts.
3) HSBC's approach to TCFD disclosure including setting targets to finance sustainable activities and reduce emissions in its operations.
TCFD implementation webinar series - risk management with HSBC (PM)CDSB
Although some organisations have begun to apply traditional enterprise risk management (ERM) processes to the identification, assessment, and management of climate-related risks, the practice is not yet widespread or well developed. Lacking reliable information about how these risks are managed, investors are unable to properly evaluate the risk profile of an organisation or its securities. During this webinar, CDSB and HSBC offer insight into the key characteristics of effective risk management practices and what good practice disclosure looks like in line with the TCFD recommendations.
TCFD implementation webinar series - risk management with HSBCLesley McKenna
Although some organisations have begun to apply traditional enterprise risk management (ERM) processes to the identification, assessment, and management of climate-related risks, the practice is not yet widespread or well developed. Lacking reliable information about how these risks are managed, investors are unable to properly evaluate the risk profile of an organisation or its securities. Here CDSB and HSBC to offer insight into the key characteristics of effective risk management practices and what good practice disclosure looks like in line with the TCFD recommendations.
TCFD Workshop: Practical steps for implementation – Michael ZimonyiMcGuinness Institute
Across Wednesday 16 October and Thursday 17 October 2019, the McGuinness Institute partnered with Simpson Grierson to host two workshops exploring the Recommendations of the TCFD in Auckland and Wellington. This presentation was given by Michael Zimonyi from the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), who came over from Germany to lead the workshops.
The world of ESG reporting is moving faster than ever. The European Union is moving fast to update the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) in 2021, the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) are reaching a critical mass and the often confusing group of reporting initiatives have committed to work together towards a comprehensive reporting landscape, with financial heavy-hitters such as the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) stepping into the game.
Webinar slides: Are we headed towards mandatory climate reporting?CDSB
This webinar examines signals from Government and the finance community about the need for mandatory disclosure and potential pathways for inclusion of the TCFD recommendations into national legislation.
The document summarizes key findings from the 2019 Status Report of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). It finds that while disclosure of climate-related financial information has increased, it remains insufficient and partial. More progress is needed to provide clear information on the potential financial impacts of climate change on companies. The report highlights challenges to implementation like lack of standardized metrics and calls for accelerated progress in climate risk reporting. It commits to further clarifying guidance and developing scenario analysis tools to support mainstreaming of climate-related financial disclosures.
Canada's Oil & Gas Sector Innovation Stakeholder Landscape (2022)Shannon Wilson
This document provides an overview of a project to update the 2017 stakeholder landscape map of Canada's oil and gas sector innovation ecosystem. It outlines the project objectives, scope, timeframe, and context. It then presents the updated 2022 stakeholder landscape map and highlights some key trends in the landscape since 2017, including increased government focus on climate change, growth of cleantech organizations, and emphasis on the green transition. The document aims to capture the current innovation ecosystem to support CRIN in advocacy and stakeholder collaboration.
1) The document summarizes the OECD guidance on transition finance, which aims to ensure the credibility of corporate climate transition plans. It outlines key challenges in transition finance and elements that make transition plans credible.
2) Over half of global greenhouse gas emissions come from energy and industry. Transition finance is mainly provided through sustainability-linked bonds and loans to help companies implement net-zero plans.
3) Credible transition plans should set science-based net-zero targets, outline strategies to meet interim goals, and integrate climate metrics into financial reporting to ensure accountability.
The document discusses how CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project) and the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) drive change toward sustainable business practices and climate-related financial reporting. CDP collects environmental data from over 5,000 companies on behalf of investors and purchasers, and scores companies' responses to incentivize emission reductions, target setting, and other climate-friendly actions. The CDSB framework provides guidance for companies to report high-quality, decision-useful environmental information to investors and stakeholders. It aims to make climate-related risks and opportunities more transparent within mainstream annual reports. Both CDP and CDSB work to integrate climate considerations into core business strategies and financial decision-making.
OECD Green Talks LIVE: Moving the world economy to net zero: the role of tran...OECD Environment
To meet the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement, decarbonisation measures will need to be financed across all sectors of the economy — most importantly in energy-intensive and hard-to-abate sectors in emerging markets and developing economies. As governments and the private sector ramp up their net-zero pledges, grapple with the ongoing energy crisis and face rising inflation, how to achieve those goals is increasingly put into question.
In the midst of these challenges, market actors and jurisdictions have ramped up efforts around transition finance, such as developing taxonomies and guidelines. But transition finance is often criticised for opening the door to greenwashing and risking emission-intensive lock-in. How can we ensure the development of robust corporate transition plans to support credible and meaningful transition investments towards net zero? And how can emission-intensive lock-in and greenwashing be avoided?
Experts on transition finance and transition planning will present and discuss their importance for moving to net-zero pathways in hard-to-abate sectors and emerging markets and developing economies, as well as outstanding challenges in this space. The presentation will draw from the recent report OECD Guidance on Transition Finance: Ensuring Credibility of Corporate Climate Transition Plans (Find the report here: https://oe.cd/transition-fin), which proposes 10 key elements to help corporates in developing transition plans, financiers to identify credible investment opportunities, and policymakers to develop strong policy frameworks.
More information: https://www.oecd.org/env/green-talks-live.htm
Overview on the European Regulatory Context on ESG matters.
The EU wants to: i) redirect capital flows towards sustainable investment; ii)manage financial risks arising from climate change, environmental and social issues; iii) promote transparency. How the EU is doing this? there are different activities and different players involved.
Communicating value creation through natural capital to the mainstreamCDSB
Accounting for the natural resources a company uses and affects offers a more complete picture of the organisation’s true health and value. However, bringing natural capital information into mainstream reporting and communicating it clearly to mainstream investors isn't straightforward.
This webinar introduces the CDSB Framework’s guiding principles and requirements to help you communicate the value you create from natural capital with the same level of rigour that's used for all the other information in your mainstream report.
This document provides an overview of ESG principles and sustainable finance. It discusses key ESG factors including environmental, social and governance issues. It also outlines major international agreements and regulatory developments driving sustainable finance. Examples of sustainable financing instruments like green bonds, loans and sustainability-linked bonds are presented. The document concludes with two case studies, one on an ADB clean technology fund financing a geothermal plant, and another on a sustainability-linked corporate bond and credit facility.
Similar to Webinar: What does climate-related financial disclosure really look like (20)
Key findings: The state of EU environmental disclosure in 2020 CDSB
The document discusses a tweet from December 20th by the organization CDSBGlobal regarding the state of EU disclosure in 2020. The tweet promotes the organization's website at www.cdsb.net/NFRD2020 and the page titled "The state of EU disclosure in 2020".
Webinar: Reporting Matters 2019 - The State of PlayCDSB
To celebrate the launch of the 2019 Reporting matters, CDSB, WBCSD and Radley Yeldar will discuss the main findings of the report and what it means for corporate reporting moving forward.
Masterclass in implementing the TCFD recommendationsCDSB
This webinar will take you through the recently published Task force for climate-related financial disclosure (TCFD) Implementation Guide created by the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Presented by the authors of the guide, you will learn how to prepare for effective TCFD-aligned disclosures and understand what good practice could look, illustrated by examples of mock disclosures using the CDSB framework and SASB standards.
Whether you’re just getting started or looking to take a more sophisticated approach to reporting, you’ll leave this webinar with practical advice and helpful resources to take the next step in climate-related financial disclosure.
EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive: How companies can make the most of it!CDSB
Slides from the launch of the Environmental reporting handbook, which offers companies ideas about what reporting environmental information under the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive could look like in practice.
The handbook uses real-life examples of annual reports to demonstrate reporting under each requirement of Directive and to show what constitutes good practice.
Download the handbook from http://cdsb.net/nfrhandbook
CDP UK spring workshop 2016 (CDSB Framework presentation)CDSB
With major changes in 2015 with the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals, the Climate Disclosure Standards Board addresses the state of natural capital disclosure in annual reports.
CDSB has comprehensively reviewed the annual reports of the FTSE 350 listed companies in the report.
This review discusses the disclosure of environmental information in the annual reports of FTSE350 companies following the implementation of mandatory greenhouse gas reporting in the UK (updates to the Companies Act 2006).
Comply or explain focuses on comparative sector analysis and uses illustrative examples to provide evidence of current practice following the policy revision. The report proposes steps that could be taken by regulators to enhance the enabling environment for disclosure. It was reviewed by Oxford University’s Saïd Business School, and by members of CDSB’s Technical Working Group.
Read the report at cdsb.net/FTSE350
The document introduces the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and its framework for reporting environmental information and natural capital. The CDSB is committed to advancing corporate reporting to equate natural capital with financial capital. The CDSB framework includes 7 guiding principles, 12 reporting requirements, and guidance on climate, forests, and water. It is used by over 340 organizations in 32 countries with a total market capitalization of $4.2 trillion spanning 10 sectors. The framework aims to become the standard reporting approach needed by investors to evaluate and compare company sustainability performance.
ENVIRONMENT~ Renewable Energy Sources and their future prospects.tiwarimanvi3129
This presentation is for us to know that how our Environment need Attention for protection of our natural resources which are depleted day by day that's why we need to take time and shift our attention to renewable energy sources instead of non-renewable sources which are better and Eco-friendly for our environment. these renewable energy sources are so helpful for our planet and for every living organism which depends on environment.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
Epcon is One of the World's leading Manufacturing Companies.EpconLP
Epcon is One of the World's leading Manufacturing Companies. With over 4000 installations worldwide, EPCON has been pioneering new techniques since 1977 that have become industry standards now. Founded in 1977, Epcon has grown from a one-man operation to a global leader in developing and manufacturing innovative air pollution control technology and industrial heating equipment.
Climate Change All over the World .pptxsairaanwer024
Climate change refers to significant and lasting changes in the average weather patterns over periods ranging from decades to millions of years. It encompasses both global warming driven by human emissions of greenhouse gases and the resulting large-scale shifts in weather patterns. While climate change is a natural phenomenon, human activities, particularly since the Industrial Revolution, have accelerated its pace and intensity
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Presented by The Global Peatlands Assessment: Mapping, Policy, and Action at GLF Peatlands 2024 - The Global Peatlands Assessment: Mapping, Policy, and Action
Enhanced action and stakeholder engagement for sustainable peatland management
Webinar: What does climate-related financial disclosure really look like
1. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
What does effective climate-related
financial disclosure really look like?
Fiona Quinlan
Technical Manager
Climate Disclosure
Standards Board
Youri Lie
Senior Manager
EY
2. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Q. What is driving your interest in implementing
the TCFD recommendations?
Investor demand
Changing regulation
Becoming part of your strategic planning and risk
management processes
Desire to align with peers in your sector who are disclosing
3. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Youri Lie
Senior Manager
EY
14. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Presented–
in the mainstream report
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
15. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
15
Good practice example:
Shell
Concise
mainstream
disclosure with
additional detail in
supplementary
report
16. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
Prepared–
according to the same rigour as
financial information
17. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
How to achieve rigour…
https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/Redefining-
Value/External-Disclosure/Assurance-Internal-
Controls/Resources/Guidance-on-improving-the-
quality-of-ESG-information-for-decision-making
18. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
Specific–
to the reporting entity
19. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
19
Good practice example:
EDF
Information on
the specific
impacts of
climate change
for their different
business areas
20. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
Coherent–
across strategy, finance and
impact
21. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
21
Good practice example:
Schneider Electric
Indicators which
demonstrate the
linkage between
climate issues and
financial performance
22. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
Supported by leadership –
with oversight and involvement
from all relevant functions
23. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
23
Good practice example:
Enel
Clearly states what
each Committees’
role is and provides
clarity on
arrangements within
its wider functions
24. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
24
Good practice example:
Royal Bank of Canada
Explanation of
the Board’s and
its Committees
oversight of
climate change
25. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
Qualified –
statement of conformance so the
reader understands the limitations
26. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
Future-oriented –
the plan is clear and stands
up as being resilient
27. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
Financed –
current financing options and
investment support the plan
28. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
28
Good practice example:
QBE
Clear year-by-year
roadmap on the actions
it will be taking over
future reporting periods
to enhance its TCFD
disclosure
29. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Effective climate-related financial
disclosures must be:
Decision-useful –
to providers of financial capital
and responsive to investors
30. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
SASB Standards
https://www.sasb.org/
34. April 2020 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Questions?
With the contribution of the
LIFE Programme
of the European Union.
Hosted by CDP Europe.
Contact: info@cdsb.net
Fiona Quinlan
CDSB
Youri Lie
EY
Editor's Notes
The 2019 EY Global Climate Risk Disclosure Barometer examines disclosures from approximately 1,000 companies across a range of sectors in 34 countries
during the 2018-19 reporting period. The report provides a snapshot of the uptake of the recommendations by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and offers insight into reporting across regions and sectors, plus suggested areas of improvement for climate disclosures.
Over the last 12 months, companies have made limited progress in addressing the quality and coverage of climate-related financial disclosures. This lack of progress is at a time when companies are facing increased scrutiny and pressure on their actions to mitigate climate change. Pressure has included direct shareholder action and public demonstrations – Global Climate Strike. New financial incentives have also been introduced, including the EU Green Taxonomy.
Most companies now commonly acknowledge climate change as a material issueThis is reflected either in a companies’ annual or sustainability reports. However, a majority of highly exposed companies still lack high quality climate disclosures.
Sectors exposed to transition risk continue to lead the wayLeading sectors include: banking, energy, manufacturing and transport. Although other sectors with high emissions, direct exposure to fossil fuel supply chains, or with investments in the energy sector or with readily accessible low carbon substitutes are scoring higher in their disclosures.
Disclosure information varies across marketsThe quality of information disclosed varies significantly across markets, with better performing markets generally linked to some level of national regulation or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) guidance.
Most companies now commonly acknowledge climate change as a material issueThis is reflected either in a companies’ annual or sustainability reports. However, a majority of highly exposed companies still lack high quality climate disclosures.
Sectors exposed to transition risk continue to lead the wayLeading sectors include: banking, energy, manufacturing and transport. Although other sectors with high emissions, direct exposure to fossil fuel supply chains, or with investments in the energy sector or with readily accessible low carbon substitutes are scoring higher in their disclosures.
Disclosure information varies across marketsThe quality of information disclosed varies significantly across markets, with better performing markets generally linked to some level of national regulation or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) guidance.
Most companies now commonly acknowledge climate change as a material issueThis is reflected either in a companies’ annual or sustainability reports. However, a majority of highly exposed companies still lack high quality climate disclosures.
Sectors exposed to transition risk continue to lead the wayLeading sectors include: banking, energy, manufacturing and transport. Although other sectors with high emissions, direct exposure to fossil fuel supply chains, or with investments in the energy sector or with readily accessible low carbon substitutes are scoring higher in their disclosures.
Disclosure information varies across marketsThe quality of information disclosed varies significantly across markets, with better performing markets generally linked to some level of national regulation or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) guidance.
Investors’ influence on companies in their portfolioThere is a clear connection between an investor’s commitment on climate change issues and the TCFD disclosures score of its portfolio.
Thank you Lesley and for that really insightful presentation Youri.
Now here at CDSB companies often ask us the question "how do I know when I’ve met the TCFD recommendations?" and "What constitutes an effective TCFD disclosure?"
So I’m now going to take you through some of the most common challenges and misconceptions that we are seeing and hearing in the market.
Once you have tackled these, you will have a complete “TCFD to-do” list, which ensures that you are producing effective and reliable climate-related financial disclosure in line with the TCFD recommendations.
Now before we dive into this, I just wanted to provide a brief reminder for those who aren't familiar with CDSB of who we are and what we do.
CDSB is a consortium of environmental and business NGOs. We were set up in 2007 at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The CDSB secretariat is hosted by CDP on behalf of our board.
Our mission is to provide decision-useful environmental information to markets via the mainstream corporate report and we achieve this by offering a framework for reporting environmental and climate information in the mainstream report.
The CDSB framework provides a set of 7 principles and 12 requirements, covering both the 'how' and 'what' of environmental disclosure for companies.
The CDSB framework is fully aligned with the TCFD recommendations and its 7 underlying principles. It's therefore also complementary to existing reporting provisions such as CDP, GRI, SASB, as well as existing regulations.
Now, with introductions out of the way I will take you through our effective TCFD disclosure to do list.
One of the most common misconceptions that we hear is that information can be disclosed in a separate TCFD or sustainability report. In fact the TCFD recommendations said from their inception that material information should be provided in the mainstream report.
When I say "mainstream report", I’m referring to the annual reporting package in which the company delivers its audited financial results. This is often referred to as the annual reports and accounts, or in the US the Form 10K
So why should climate-related information be disclosed in the mainstream report?
Well, the TCFD said that due to the non-diversifiable nature of climate risk ,affecting nearly all industries, investors want to see governance and risk management disclosures by all companies and that these should therefore be provided in the mainstream report. It then said that further disclosure, addressing the company’s strategy and metrics and targets should be provided if this information is deemed material by the company.
So why is mainstream disclosure important? Well, the mainstream report is the company’s core communication to investors, so material climate information should be both disclosed in the narrative and reflected in the numbers to support well-informed investor decision-making.
If it’s placed in other documents, it will be harder for investors to locate and may not be considered in the context of the company’s wider strategy and performance. Additional disclosure, for example providing further detail and supporting information, may be located in other supplementary reports to support a concise mainstream disclosure, but your material climate-related information should be found in the mainstream report.
An example of an organisation doing this effectively is Shell, who provide a concise summary of their climate-related financial disclosure in their annual report and form 20-F, and then link to their separate energy transition report for further detail on their scenario analysis work.
An example of an organisation doing this effectively is Shell, who provide a concise summary of their climate-related financial disclosure in their annual report and form 20-F, and then link to their separate energy transition report for further detail on their scenario analysis work.
https://reports.shell.com/annual-report/2018/servicepages/downloads/files/shell_annual_report_2018.pdf
https://www.shell.com/energy-and-innovation/the-energy-future/shell-energy-transition-report/_jcr_content/par/toptasks.stream/1524757699226/3f2ad7f01e2181c302cdc453c5642c77acb48ca3/web-shell-energy-transition-report.pdf
Another challenge we often hear is that investors do not consider company reporting on climate change to be of the same quality as financial information, limiting its usefulness for decision-making.
It is therefore important to ensure that the same rigour and management responsibility is applied to climate-related financial information, as is applied to financial statements in the mainstream report.
While independent external assurance is not necessarily a requirement, information should be prepared as though it would be assured, undergoing the same or comparable internal controls and governance procedures as financial disclosure to ensure its reliability.
The application of similar internal controls as for financial information also helps to address other disclosure challenges such as materiality, which is a critical aspect when considering disclosure of financial information.
For further information on how to achieve this rigour, we recommend that you consider the guidance released in 2019 by WBCSD and the Danish auditor FSR on “improving the quality of ESG information for decision-making through internal controls.
Now, turning to our next challenge another common criticism we hear is that company disclosures on climate change are of a “boiler plate” nature, that is not sufficiently specific to the company or its particular circumstances, addressing the issue of climate change only in quite generic and high-level terms.
However, in order for disclosures to be decision-useful for investors in line with the aims of the TCFD, they need to be specific to the business. Generic and boilerplate disclosures are not helpful to users of reporting, for example if the risks and opportunities of climate change at a societal level are reported, without being linked back to the industry or business in question, disclosures may not be meaningful for decision-making.
So in order to be specific to the reporting entity, disclosures should be complete, but free from immaterial clutter and unnecessary or duplicative detail that obscures major trends and events that are specifically relevant to the organisation.
An example of good practice reporting in this regard is EDF, who provide disclosure on the specific impacts of climate change for their different business areas, for example operations, products and services, value chain and suppliers and investments and acquisitions. This helps to provide a contextualised view of how EDF integrates climate risk into its business strategy.
EDF provide disclosure on the specific impacts of climate change for their different business areas, for example operations, products and services, value chain and suppliers and investments and acquisitions. This helps to provide a contextualised view of how EDF integrates climate risk into its business strategy.
https://www.edf.fr/sites/default/files/contrib/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/espace-finance-en/financial-information/regulated-information/reference-document/edf-ddr-2018-en.pdf
Ensuring that climate-related information is well linked to other aspects of business performance reported in the mainstream report, such as strategic and financial disclosures, is another commonly cited challenge in adopting the TCFD.
In order to be effective, climate-related disclosures should be connected to other information in the mainstream report. For example, consider how your business’ strategy is impacted by climate-related risks and opportunities, and what this will this mean for the various numbers reported in your financial statements. Climate-related disclosure should not be stand-alone and should be provided in the context of the wider information provided in the mainstream report.
A simple means by which you might seek to start doing this is to provide page references which link between the relevant report sections, moving to greater integration of the narrative and quantitative content over time.
A good practice example here is Schneider Electric. In their integrated report they provide a clear table summarising the linkages and coherence between the different aspects of their climate-related disclosure. Additionally, alongside more conventional environmental metrics such as carbon emissions, they also disclose indicators that linked clearer to their wider business performance, such as the increase in turnover from the Energy & Sustainability services they provide. This shows a clear link between climate-related and financial performance.
In their integrated report they provide a clear table summarising the linkages and coherence between the different aspects of their climate-related disclosure. Additionally, alongside more conventional environmental metrics such as carbon emissions, they also disclose indicators that linked clearer to their wider business performance, such as the increase in turnover from the Energy & Sustainability services they provide. This shows a clear link between climate-related and financial performance.
https://www.se.com/ww/en/assets/564/document/69032/2018-annual-report.pdf
Another potential misconception that we encounter is that the sustainability or CSR department should have responsibility for implementing the TCFD recommendations. However, it’s vital that buy-in is gained from across the business, with leadership input and accountability from all relevant functions, to ensure integrated disclosure.
A key way in which this can be demonstrated is through disclosures under the governance pillar of the recommendations, illustrating which individuals and committees at board and management level have responsibilities regarding climate-related information.
Governance disclosures should be clear on the specific matters that are considered by board and management respectively, outlining the relationship between governance arrangements at different levels and disclosing the specific actions being taken. These should provide clarity on business line or geographically specific arrangements where appropriate.
Some good practice examples we would bring to your attention here include Italian Utility Enel and Royal Bank of Canada.
Enel’s disclosure illustrates the responsibilities of each relevant committee, for example the Control and Risk Committee and Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, in its climate strategy. It states specifically what the committee’s role is, for example examining climate-related targets, or reviewing and approving the company’s non-financial reporting, and also provides clarity on arrangements within its wider functions, regions and business lines.
Royal Bank of Canada explain clearly the Board’s and its committees oversight of climate change. They also explain which functions are involved in various processes relating to climate issues and tie these responsibilities back to its management level performance goals.
Enel’s disclosure illustrates the responsibilities of each relevant committee, for example the Control and Risk Committee and Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, in its climate strategy. It states specifically what the committee’s role is, for example examining climate-related targets, or reviewing and approving the company’s non-financial reporting, and also provides clarity on arrangements within its wider functions, regions and business lines.
https://www.enel.com/content/dam/enel-com/documenti/investitori/informazioni-finanziarie/2018/annuali/en/annual-report_2018.pdf
Royal Bank of Canada explain clearly the Board’s and its committees oversight of climate change. They also explain which functions are involved in various processes relating to climate issues and tie these responsibilities back to its management level performance goals.
https://annualreports.rbc.com/ar2018/downloads/
Although more organisations are now providing disclosure that addresses some of the TCFD recommendations, a common challenge is the completeness of this disclosure and the level of transparency companies provide on this subject. For example, the 2019 TCFD status report found that on average companies were making only 3.6 of the 11 recommended disclosures.
Providing a clear statement of conformance with the recommendations, which provides transparency over the limitations of current information, is therefore key. Alongside this, companies should state how they plan to address any existing disclosure gaps in future reporting. Ultimately, investors are going to quickly be able to determine what information is missing, so failing to acknowledge this in your disclosures doesn’t do you any favours!
This is in line with the five year implementation pathway incorporated into the TCFD, which recognised that fully aligned disclosure was likely to be an iterative process over a number of disclosure cycles. The key thing is to ensure that your disclosure demonstrates continued progress in improving transparency over time.
A good example to take a look at here is Australian insurer QBE, which provides a clear year-by-year roadmap on the actions it will be taking over future reporting periods as to enhance its TCFD disclosure.
A key aspect of the TCFD was the emphasis on providing forward-looking disclosures, particularly through the use of the scenario analysis, however this is often an area that companies struggle with. In the 2019 TCFD status report, disclosures on the resilience of company strategy to different climate scenarios was found to the weakest area of uptake, with only 12% of reviewed companies providing this.
However, to provide effective climate-related financial disclosures it is key that information is forward-looking!
A starting point to achieve this could be complementing historically focused climate information with narrative on its influence on future performance. As well as looking at the past and present, disclosures should look to the future and communicate trends and factors relating to climate-related matters that are likely to affect the organisation’s future performance, position and development. Ultimately users of the mainstream report want to understand if the business will be resilient to future climate-related risks and if you are positioned to take advantage of climate-related opportunities. Another key part of this providing clarity on the time-frames over which your risk management and strategy is considered i.e. defining what you mean by short-, medium- and long-term in this context.
Whilst we have seen a growth in narrative TCFD disclosures, a key remaining issue for companies to tackle is providing disclosure on how its climate change strategy will be financed.
Companies in high impact sectors such as oil and gas are generally starting to provide clearer disclosures on the integration of climate change into their business strategies, but are often still falling short when it comes to linking this to their financial planning.
For example, disclosure on the strategic integration of low carbon opportunities into a company’s business model, is not always followed through with clarity over the level of capital or R&D investment apportioned to these issues.
Support your narrative reporting on climate-related matters by illustrating to your investors how you are executing this in your strategic and financial plans is a key aspect of effective disclosure. Simply put you need to ensure you are “putting your money where your mouth is”
QBE provides a clear year-by-year roadmap on the actions it will be taking over future reporting periods as to enhance its TCFD disclosure.
https://www.qbe.com/-/media/group/qbe-annual-report-2019.pdf
Ultimately reporting needs to be decision-useful for the users of your mainstream report. Key users of climate-related information include investors, lenders and insurance underwriters, who increasingly need to integrate a company-specific understanding of these issues into their decision-making.
A useful thing to keep in mind is how users will be reading the reports, simple things like keeping information clearly formatted, succinct and in a consistent and comparable structure over time will all support its decision-usefulness for investors and other users. Also consider the metrics you disclose and whether these are consistent with those widely used for your sector, for example the reporting boundaries you apply and intensity metrics you select, such as emissions by revenue or by product output.
The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s standards may be a helpful reference point here. They have developed 77 industry specific standards, which set out financially material sustainability topics and their associated metrics for a typical company in an industry.
So that concludes the overview of our TCFD “To do list”. I hope that this provides you with some helpful suggestions as to how your organisation can overcome some of the key challenges and misconceptions regarding the TCFD, enabling you to provide effective and decision useful climate-related financial disclosure. I’ll now hand you back to Lesley for the next part of our webinar.
The SASB standards may also be a useful tool to support this. SASB have developed 77 industry specific standards, which set out financially material sustainability topics and their associated metrics for a typical company in an industry.
So that concludes the overview of our TCFD “To do list”. I hope that this provides you with some helpful suggestions as to how your organisation can overcome some of the key challenges and misconceptions regarding the TCFD, enabling you to provide effective and decision useful climate-related financial disclosure. I’ll now hand you back to Lesley for the next part of our webinar.