ENERGY DEMOCRACY IN
MYANMAR:
SCALING UP RENEWABLE
ENERGY SOCIAL
ENTREPRENEURS
Dipti Vaghela
Fulbright Public Policy Fellow
Renewable Energy Association of Myanmar (REAM)
"Perspectives on Energy Justice: Views from the UK, India, and Myanmar"
Smart Villages Webinar
September 29, 2017
 National Electrification Plan (NEP)
 30% to 100% by 2030
 $400M World Bank IDA loan
 Gap to address: Mini-Grid
Integration
 “Least Cost” analysis overlooked RE
mini-grids, yet 6000+ RE mini-grids
exist.
 Rural electrification policy
development
 Top-down ‘Business as Usual’
 Subsidized solar home lighting systems
 Clean coal and massive large hydropower
Universal Electrification Target
Policy Situation Overview
Source: Department of Rural Development 2015;
World Bank NEP PAD 2015; Consultant Analysis
Source: State-wise Statistical Data Collection, Pyi Pyi Thant,
Mekong Ecology and Energy Net (MEE Net), July 2017.
Source: Interview, Soe Tint Aung, Royal Htoo Linn
Manufacturing, Co, Ltd. August 2017.
Source: Feasbility Study on Rice Husk Power Generation,
Mitsubishi Research Institute, 2014.
RE Mini-Grids in Myanmar
~30-years of Experience
 Micro/Mini
Hydropower
 6000+ units below
1MW for village
electrification
 Biomass Gasifiers
 10,000+ units
powering small-scale
rice mills
 500+ units for village
electrification
Myanmar’s Unique Progress
Lessons for Int’l Development
Practitioners
 International development programs aim to design
programs that can scale, self-replicate, and
sustain.
 How did Myanmar’s 6000+ mini-grids (biomass
gassifiers and micro/mini hydro) happen?
 No technology training
 No international funding
 No scaled government program or policy
 Yet, more mini-grids than any funded program!
 Opportunity for development partners to learn from
Myanmar how locally-driven RE mini-grids can
Source of Myanmar’s Mini-Grid
Success
Mini-Grid Social Entrepreneurs
 20 – 30 years experience
 6000+ mini-grids
 Self-Financed, Community-
Owned
 Self-Engineered Technology
 Productive
End Use
built-in
A Closer Look at Existing Mini-Grids
PV, Biomass Gasifiers, Micro/Mini
Hydro
Solar for Agriculture in Dry Zone
Solar PV Drip Irrigation
 REAM Developer, U Than
Htay
 1kW per unit, with drip
irrigation, no batteries
 Inclusive Approach
 Developer provides 5-year
financing to the VEC
 If 5-years not enough,
financing provided to land
owner, under terms that
benefit all households of the
village.
 Developer’s Vision and
Need
 All villages of the Dry Zone
Elephant in the Room
Biomass Gassifiers
 4 designs by Royal Htoo
Linn Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd.
 Up to 2MW in series of units
 Productive End Use
installed
 Village electrification, 145
units
 Rice Mill, 358 units
 Irrigation Pumping, 45 units
 Ice Mills, 69 units
 Oil and Saw Mills, 116 units
 1350kW, Biomass-Diesel Hybrid
 24-hours electricity for entire state
capital
 Distributions lines leased from MoEP
 Ran 2010-2015, until national grid
arrived
 Other projects, 500kW – 1150kW
each
 Vision
 Upgrade 10,000+ gasifiers  sustain rice small-scale rice
farmers
 No pollution design in final round of testing at DRI, MoEducation
Powering Communities and Small
Industry
Micro and Mini Hydropower (<1MW)
 5000+ projects, mostly Shan
State
 Many yet to be identified
 Quality Local Fabrication
 Francis, Pelton, Turgo turbines
 Penstock and Transformers
 Ownership Models
 Based on community’s strengths
 Community, Cooperative, or
Developer owned projects
 Cooperative of Local Industry
 Vision
 Provide low-cost, reliable
electricity
 Tap all micro/mini hydro potential
Projects
Naung Pein Project, Northern Shan
State
 Developer: Sai Htun Hla & Brothers Hydropower
Company
 Output capacity: 200kW
 Construction: 2009 – 2012
 Done in phases – electricity supplied since 2010
 Head and Design Flow: 274m and 142 lps
 Turbine: Pelton; Generator: 300kW
 Consumers: 550 in 14-villages (out of 2000 households)
 Transmission and Distribution
 45km total of 11kV, 230V, and 400V
 15 transformers
Projects
Naung Pein Project, Northern Shan
State
Ownership and Financing
Hybrid: Developer + Cooperative
 Total Cost: $430,000 (as in 2009) or $2150/kW
 Financing
 29% Equity (24 village-based shareholders, plus
developer)
 52% Community contribution through connection charge
 19% Short-term debt, repaid in 10-months
 Ownership: 25 shareholders organized as a cooperative,
as per 1992 revision of Cooperatives Law.
 Monthly income
 Before grid arrival: $5500 - $7500
 After grid arrival: $1,100 (as in 2017)
 REAM and Hydro Empowerment Network friends
Connection Fees and Tariff
Customized to Community’s
Strengths
 Connection Fees: $230 - $385 (as in 2017)
 Mini Hydro Tariff: $0.15 - $0.31 per kWh (as in 2017)
No. of Villages Single-Phase Additional 3-Phase
Lowest Demand 7 230 USD No connection
charge
Medium Demand
4 307 USD
No connection
charge
Highest Demand
(near to highway) 3 385 USD
No connection
charge
Single-Phase Additional 3-phase
Types of
Consumers
< 30 units > 30 units Regardless of
consumption
Residential 0.23 USD/unit 0.15 USD/unit 0.31 USD/unit
Commercial Use 0.23 USD/unit 0.15 USD/unit 0.31 USD/unit
Temporary 0.62 USD/unit, plus 77 USD advance
Main Grid Tariff: $0.06 <200 kWh; $0.08 >200 kWh, plus connection fee (as in 2017); Main grid has
poor voltage.
Management Body (same staff for 7-
yrs)
Naung Pein Mini Hydropower Utility
 Staff Salaries: Total $825/month (as in 2017)
 Manager
 Cashier
 Powerhouse Operators
 Intake Operator
 Linesmen
 Management Issues
 Minimal, e.g. late payments
 Peak Load – no issues
 Social awareness
 Volt meters in enterprises
Cornerstone of Financial Viability
Productive End Use
Changed from
Diesel Powered
After Arrival
of Mini Hydro Project
Corn
milling
4 units Air compressors
for micro water
utilities
12 units,
1.5kW each
Corn
drying
1 unit, 10-
hp
Cement Brick
Making (mixer and
molder)
3-units
Telecom Station 1 unit, 2kW
Patrol Pump
Stations
2 units, 3hp
each
With exception of a few shops, all use Mini-Hydro instead of Main Grid, due to
voltage issues.
Cornerstone of Financial Viability
Productive End Use
Policy Recommendations
Role of Local Social Entrepreneurs
 Why the NEP would benefit from scaling RE mini-
grids?
 Common Sense
 Faster to expand existing sector than build new  China,
Germany
 Biomass gasifiers and micro/mini hydro supply lowest cost
electricity
 Invaluable: Myanmar’s Local Social Entrepreneurs
 Local engineering/manufacturing  Cost-effective and reliable
 Entrepreneurial skills to identify productive end use 
Sustainablity
 Not-for-profit Motivation  Local communities with long-lived
projects
 Decades of trust and networks built in remote areas
Scalability
 How to support Local Social Entrepreneurs of
 Patronized Policy and Program Development
 Can local and external actors be equal knowledge
partners?
 Thinking Beyond Solar PV
 Can donors take effort to understand all technologies?
 Inclusion of Local Social Entrepreneurs
 Can we overcome language, culture, institutional
barriers?
 Can local and non-local private sectors cooperate to
prioritize Myanmar over profit margins?
 Grants (Capital Subsidies) vs Financing (Interest
Subsidies)
 Can we see that ‘free money’ is short-lived; creates
Challenges
Can we overcome? Yes, in
Myanmar!
Acknowledgements
This presentation includes data, photos, and/or inspiration
from:
U Aung Myint, General Secretary, Renewable Energy Association of
Myanmar
Bikash Pandey, Innovations Lead, Winrock International
Kapila Subasinghe, DFCC Bank, Sri Lanka
Pyi Pyi Thant, Mekong Energy and Ecology Network
U Sai Htun Hla, Sai Htun Hla and Brothers Mini Hydropower Company
U Soe Tint Aung, Founder and Director, Royal Htoo Linn Manufacturing Co.
U Than Htay, Renewable Energy Association of Myanmar
Walt Ratterman, late founder, Sun Energy Power International
Witoon Permpongsacharoen, Mekong Energy and Ecology Network
Thank you
Dipti Vaghela
Fulbright-Clinton Public Policy Fellow 2016-2017
Burma (Myanmar)
Coordinator
Hydropower Empowerment Network
diptimv@gmail.com

WEBINAR | SEP 2017 | ENERGY DEMOCRACY IN MYANMAR: SCALING UP RENEWABLE ENERGY SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS

  • 1.
    ENERGY DEMOCRACY IN MYANMAR: SCALINGUP RENEWABLE ENERGY SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS Dipti Vaghela Fulbright Public Policy Fellow Renewable Energy Association of Myanmar (REAM) "Perspectives on Energy Justice: Views from the UK, India, and Myanmar" Smart Villages Webinar September 29, 2017
  • 2.
     National ElectrificationPlan (NEP)  30% to 100% by 2030  $400M World Bank IDA loan  Gap to address: Mini-Grid Integration  “Least Cost” analysis overlooked RE mini-grids, yet 6000+ RE mini-grids exist.  Rural electrification policy development  Top-down ‘Business as Usual’  Subsidized solar home lighting systems  Clean coal and massive large hydropower Universal Electrification Target Policy Situation Overview
  • 3.
    Source: Department ofRural Development 2015; World Bank NEP PAD 2015; Consultant Analysis Source: State-wise Statistical Data Collection, Pyi Pyi Thant, Mekong Ecology and Energy Net (MEE Net), July 2017. Source: Interview, Soe Tint Aung, Royal Htoo Linn Manufacturing, Co, Ltd. August 2017. Source: Feasbility Study on Rice Husk Power Generation, Mitsubishi Research Institute, 2014. RE Mini-Grids in Myanmar ~30-years of Experience  Micro/Mini Hydropower  6000+ units below 1MW for village electrification  Biomass Gasifiers  10,000+ units powering small-scale rice mills  500+ units for village electrification
  • 4.
    Myanmar’s Unique Progress Lessonsfor Int’l Development Practitioners  International development programs aim to design programs that can scale, self-replicate, and sustain.  How did Myanmar’s 6000+ mini-grids (biomass gassifiers and micro/mini hydro) happen?  No technology training  No international funding  No scaled government program or policy  Yet, more mini-grids than any funded program!  Opportunity for development partners to learn from Myanmar how locally-driven RE mini-grids can
  • 5.
    Source of Myanmar’sMini-Grid Success Mini-Grid Social Entrepreneurs  20 – 30 years experience  6000+ mini-grids  Self-Financed, Community- Owned  Self-Engineered Technology  Productive End Use built-in
  • 6.
    A Closer Lookat Existing Mini-Grids PV, Biomass Gasifiers, Micro/Mini Hydro
  • 7.
    Solar for Agriculturein Dry Zone Solar PV Drip Irrigation  REAM Developer, U Than Htay  1kW per unit, with drip irrigation, no batteries  Inclusive Approach  Developer provides 5-year financing to the VEC  If 5-years not enough, financing provided to land owner, under terms that benefit all households of the village.  Developer’s Vision and Need  All villages of the Dry Zone
  • 8.
    Elephant in theRoom Biomass Gassifiers  4 designs by Royal Htoo Linn Manufacturing Co., Ltd.  Up to 2MW in series of units  Productive End Use installed  Village electrification, 145 units  Rice Mill, 358 units  Irrigation Pumping, 45 units  Ice Mills, 69 units  Oil and Saw Mills, 116 units  1350kW, Biomass-Diesel Hybrid  24-hours electricity for entire state capital  Distributions lines leased from MoEP  Ran 2010-2015, until national grid arrived  Other projects, 500kW – 1150kW each  Vision  Upgrade 10,000+ gasifiers  sustain rice small-scale rice farmers  No pollution design in final round of testing at DRI, MoEducation
  • 9.
    Powering Communities andSmall Industry Micro and Mini Hydropower (<1MW)  5000+ projects, mostly Shan State  Many yet to be identified  Quality Local Fabrication  Francis, Pelton, Turgo turbines  Penstock and Transformers  Ownership Models  Based on community’s strengths  Community, Cooperative, or Developer owned projects  Cooperative of Local Industry  Vision  Provide low-cost, reliable electricity  Tap all micro/mini hydro potential
  • 10.
    Projects Naung Pein Project,Northern Shan State  Developer: Sai Htun Hla & Brothers Hydropower Company  Output capacity: 200kW  Construction: 2009 – 2012  Done in phases – electricity supplied since 2010  Head and Design Flow: 274m and 142 lps  Turbine: Pelton; Generator: 300kW  Consumers: 550 in 14-villages (out of 2000 households)  Transmission and Distribution  45km total of 11kV, 230V, and 400V  15 transformers
  • 11.
    Projects Naung Pein Project,Northern Shan State
  • 12.
    Ownership and Financing Hybrid:Developer + Cooperative  Total Cost: $430,000 (as in 2009) or $2150/kW  Financing  29% Equity (24 village-based shareholders, plus developer)  52% Community contribution through connection charge  19% Short-term debt, repaid in 10-months  Ownership: 25 shareholders organized as a cooperative, as per 1992 revision of Cooperatives Law.  Monthly income  Before grid arrival: $5500 - $7500  After grid arrival: $1,100 (as in 2017)  REAM and Hydro Empowerment Network friends
  • 13.
    Connection Fees andTariff Customized to Community’s Strengths  Connection Fees: $230 - $385 (as in 2017)  Mini Hydro Tariff: $0.15 - $0.31 per kWh (as in 2017) No. of Villages Single-Phase Additional 3-Phase Lowest Demand 7 230 USD No connection charge Medium Demand 4 307 USD No connection charge Highest Demand (near to highway) 3 385 USD No connection charge Single-Phase Additional 3-phase Types of Consumers < 30 units > 30 units Regardless of consumption Residential 0.23 USD/unit 0.15 USD/unit 0.31 USD/unit Commercial Use 0.23 USD/unit 0.15 USD/unit 0.31 USD/unit Temporary 0.62 USD/unit, plus 77 USD advance Main Grid Tariff: $0.06 <200 kWh; $0.08 >200 kWh, plus connection fee (as in 2017); Main grid has poor voltage.
  • 14.
    Management Body (samestaff for 7- yrs) Naung Pein Mini Hydropower Utility  Staff Salaries: Total $825/month (as in 2017)  Manager  Cashier  Powerhouse Operators  Intake Operator  Linesmen  Management Issues  Minimal, e.g. late payments  Peak Load – no issues  Social awareness  Volt meters in enterprises
  • 15.
    Cornerstone of FinancialViability Productive End Use Changed from Diesel Powered After Arrival of Mini Hydro Project Corn milling 4 units Air compressors for micro water utilities 12 units, 1.5kW each Corn drying 1 unit, 10- hp Cement Brick Making (mixer and molder) 3-units Telecom Station 1 unit, 2kW Patrol Pump Stations 2 units, 3hp each With exception of a few shops, all use Mini-Hydro instead of Main Grid, due to voltage issues.
  • 16.
    Cornerstone of FinancialViability Productive End Use
  • 17.
    Policy Recommendations Role ofLocal Social Entrepreneurs  Why the NEP would benefit from scaling RE mini- grids?  Common Sense  Faster to expand existing sector than build new  China, Germany  Biomass gasifiers and micro/mini hydro supply lowest cost electricity  Invaluable: Myanmar’s Local Social Entrepreneurs  Local engineering/manufacturing  Cost-effective and reliable  Entrepreneurial skills to identify productive end use  Sustainablity  Not-for-profit Motivation  Local communities with long-lived projects  Decades of trust and networks built in remote areas Scalability  How to support Local Social Entrepreneurs of
  • 18.
     Patronized Policyand Program Development  Can local and external actors be equal knowledge partners?  Thinking Beyond Solar PV  Can donors take effort to understand all technologies?  Inclusion of Local Social Entrepreneurs  Can we overcome language, culture, institutional barriers?  Can local and non-local private sectors cooperate to prioritize Myanmar over profit margins?  Grants (Capital Subsidies) vs Financing (Interest Subsidies)  Can we see that ‘free money’ is short-lived; creates Challenges Can we overcome? Yes, in Myanmar!
  • 19.
    Acknowledgements This presentation includesdata, photos, and/or inspiration from: U Aung Myint, General Secretary, Renewable Energy Association of Myanmar Bikash Pandey, Innovations Lead, Winrock International Kapila Subasinghe, DFCC Bank, Sri Lanka Pyi Pyi Thant, Mekong Energy and Ecology Network U Sai Htun Hla, Sai Htun Hla and Brothers Mini Hydropower Company U Soe Tint Aung, Founder and Director, Royal Htoo Linn Manufacturing Co. U Than Htay, Renewable Energy Association of Myanmar Walt Ratterman, late founder, Sun Energy Power International Witoon Permpongsacharoen, Mekong Energy and Ecology Network
  • 20.
    Thank you Dipti Vaghela Fulbright-ClintonPublic Policy Fellow 2016-2017 Burma (Myanmar) Coordinator Hydropower Empowerment Network diptimv@gmail.com

Editor's Notes

  • #4 Note on “solar”: includes both solar household systems and solar mini-grids.
  • #5 As important as the numbers is the approach, Yes, Myanmar’s mini-grids technology needs upgrading. The local developers have been the first to ask for this. But the fact that thousands of projects have been -- using local technology and self-financing -- deserves to be called a SUCCESS and case to LEARN FROM, rather only than a case to ‘rescue’ of ‘fix’.
  • #7 Let’s a take closer look at the 3 prominent mini-grid sectors in Myanmar.
  • #8 There are several new solar mini-grid developers which REAM would like to connect with. This is a snapshot of U Than Htay’s work, in which PV is packaged with drip irrigation.
  • #9 Here I share about the work of the leading biomass gassifier developer, U Soe Tint Aung. The development community hasn’t yet warmed up to biomass gassifiers. But we hope this changes. Thousands of biomass gassifiers are running in Myanmar, particularly at rice mills. Because these units need upgraded technology, they continue to pollute natural water sources. It is likely that they will not be abandoned even after the grid arrives. And here is where the ‘elephant in the room’ provides an opportunity.
  • #10 70% of community-owned projects function, and 100% of cooperative-owned or developer-owned projects function.
  • #14 Having worked on the ground, designing micro hydro with community’s, I know firsthand that creating AND implementing this type of a nuanced consumer cost structure requires much process and trust between all local stakeholders.
  • #18 It is better strategize to expand mini-grid electrification in Myanmar by organically building on the capabilities of existing developers while gradually allowing new entrants. Existing micro-hydro and biomass gasification mini-grids currently supply the lowest cost electricity to off-grid populations. Existing developers have developed trust with their customers and models that have productive end use as a cornerstone to financial viability. These models need to be built upon rather than discarded in favor of new technologies and new developers who will need time to establish that trust, particularly at a time when the grid is also expected to expand rapidly.  Needed technology improvements can be achieved by providing incentives to developers as they construct new systems or expand and upgrade existing ones.