WATER CONSUMPTION.ppt

WATER
CONSUMPTION?
POPULATIONN SIZE: 65 MILLIONS
BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT

DATA FOUND IN THE DOCUMENT
■ 2 CLASSES
■ DATA FROM THE MEDIA
■ DATA FROM THE GEOGRAPHY
DATA LOG
DATA FRAME
STEP 1- DISCOVERY OF THE WATER
MODEL: THE WATER TOTEM
WATER TOTEM
HOUSEHOLD
CONSUMPTION
UNKNOWNS
KNOWNS
DATA
COLLECTION
=
EXTRACTION
DATA
ORGANISA
TION
DISCOVERY OF
THE MODEL
STEP 2

Water management in time
of climate change
■ A review from the ground and the forefront for Paris
Agreement and COP27 in Sharm el Sheik. The dimension of
water is neglected in the global warming so it was important
for the climate and water stakeholders to consider the issue
of water in the future COP (for example, COP 28).
■ I am happy for concretization of donor investment that can
find a way to climate actions. It is means that investment
methods and the researches were successful, in the budget,
in the procedure to flow money, and the money access is
designed for the climate actions.
■ Warning! Mind the gap, because today, the likelihood of
crooks investing money in climate actions might be fake-
news. The surge of fake-news for climate actions investment
will go now fake investors are worrying about the climate
change

Data management and
water management
■ First, start surveying the customers: What are looking for?
■ The organizations narrative may not be the real world of
water.
■ To that, it is important to communicate and to describe
the process in order to have disagreed data, because the
water is linked to the data, but also there will times,
when there is no data that should not prevent you to
advance your work.
■ Lacks of data means using your intuition

Water management samples
■ Survey, analyzing and Benchmarking United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: SDG1:
Poverty reduction, SDG2: food security, SDG3: healthy life, SDG4: Education, SDG5: Gender,
SDG6: water/sanitation, SDG7: Energy4All, SDG8: Economic Growth, SDG9: Infrastructure,
SDG10: Equity, SDG11: Smart cities, SDG12: Production/consumption, SDG13: Climate actions,
SDG14: life under oceans/seas, SDG15: life on land, SDG16: Climate justice and SDG17:
cooperation
■ Ukraine grain negotiation (Uncertainty Voluntary, Planned market Economy): water was
used to produce the grains, but because of the war it was not sold. It was a threat for all
(Ukraine, Russia, Turkey and the starving regions. So, UN negotiation aimed at freeing the
maritime routes thought port of Black sea regions. Russia wanted a high for the grains, and
United Nations looked at reducing the famine in Horn of Africa and other countries
(Afghanistan) with an optimum price. When agreed, Turkey open the routes for ships to carry
the food.
■ Virtual water in Middle East North Africa (MENA) region: hydro-politics of water and water
diplomacy. Africa is full of water (more many others continents, but hat is lacking is the water
investment and water governance. A solution such as Ukraine food grain market is the virtual
water: food against the water investment in infrastructures.
■ Unrestrained forcing versus bold fostering strategies: Water is also an energy comparable to
the wind, nuclear energy. IBERIA exemption is not a failure of Spain or Portugal, but a bold
fostering in renewable energies (water, wind…), contrarily to unrestrained forcing of excessive
consumption of fossils fuels (Gas, oil…) by the majority of European countries
■ Ultimately, water is an opportunity and a danger.
■ Because is polluted only if you can use water. Cost of cleaning water is
too expensive, the temptation like other natural resources is the
avoidance of recycling. So, it best at saving on the water resource.
Assessing the water resource is unclear, by ignoring the multilayers,
multidimensional, mutual reinforcing between water and the nexus uses.
Also, Water solidarity.

Water is indispensable to all life,
(including mountain stones)
■ Clarity about the case (and the water injustice are inner core of a country
development, can nurture poverty, because is essential for all life including
industrial, firms, and artificial lives
■ Tsunami in Mountain that my organization Business Innovation Research
Development with UN-ECOSOC special consultative status, 2016, new York, USA. In
Huttarakhand disaster 2013, we first to discover the causes of tsunami in
mountains and we reported it in writing to the United Nations International
Strategy Disaster Reduction. It has been confirmed in 2022 by world experts and
organizations that took opportunity of Covid to visit Himalaya valley to find the
causes. Evidence to http://www.slideshare.net/GeorgesRADJOU
■ So water can displace mountains and break down stones and create a danger for
population. living in valleys with reservoirs filled of stones.
■ It is comparable to toilet. If you want to reduce the toilet water consumption, you
just need to put stones in the water reservoir of the toilet and you can flush the
toilet with less water
■ Water is the main ingredient of climate change (COP27), in spite of the facts that
all COPs never discussed about water

Mechanism of saving water in
toilets is comparable to tsunami
in mountain with valley reservoirs
v
v
Toilet reservoir is
(V) when filled with
water, so you can
flush V liters of
water in the toilet
N (number of stones x v
(volume of a stone)= V
N= 5 -> v = 5v
Cuve
for
flushed
Water
Of
V
volume
Saving water in the toilet reservoir during the flush is
5v and the water used for flushing (V) initially has
changed when you put the stones in the toilet water
reservoir: Volumes of stone equivalent water is 5v.
The new water flushed is:
V – 5v
Mechanism of saving water in the toilets
.
The stones come from the mountains, and they
can fill the water reservoir in the valleys. When
the reservoirs are filled with stones, the volume of
the reservoir is reduced, and when it is raining in
the mountains, the water is flushed from the
reservoir like tsunamis in mountains with impacts
are on people lives, livelihood and properties.
Tsunami in mountains occurred in the
same way as your flushing action in the
toilet of your house

■ This sample is not anodyne, because France is blessed from
God. So, it is not a challenge to produce water in France, I
am not an activist for France, but all waters in France come
from France. All the rivers and water sources are in France,
inside the national borders. So, there are no potential
armed conflicts or violence's around the resources for
potential uses of water in production or consumption.
■ so it is explaining the pros and cons of production wasting
water, and water diplomacy and governance. The viewpoint
is not partisan and neutrality is a rigor for the author to
show the feasibility of process, with simple ideas, to leave
nobody behind and to give shapes to how people and leaders
can think about consumption, production in time of climate
change, environment and development
■ Best country governance are: Arab countries- they have no
water, but fully developed
■ Bad country of poor governance: case of Mozambique is full
of water, but full also of floods, and catastrophic event and
water risks
Case of a medium good water
country for governance: France

Basic relationship of the water
and land (case of France)
50 km
50 km
1 KM of RIVERS
France hydrology:1 Kilometer length of river water for every 50 km 2
Water
Flow in
Water
Flow out

Data to help about the water
flexibility

DATA/ MEDIA-LA VIE.BIO (REF.:
INTERNET, 160 LITERS /DAY.PERSON
■ 7% for food and drink;
■ 10% for washing dishes
■ 12% for washing clothes;
■ 40% for hygiene (baths and showers);
■ 20% for sanitary facilities (count about 6 litres of water
for each flush);
■ 6% for watering the garden and cleaning outside;
■ 5% for cleaning the house.

DATA EXTRACTION
(AFTER COLLECTION AND ORGANIZATION)
DATA FROM THE
MEDIA: INSEE, LA
VIE;BIO, PLANET
FR
DATA FROM THE
GEOGRAPHY OF
FRANCE, EUROPE
AND THE WORLD
WATER
REAL
WORLD
WATER
ORGANIZED
DATA
DATA FROM INFORMATION
SYSTEM (MEDIA ONLINE)
DATA FROM
EDUCATION AND
PERSONAL ACTIVITY
DATA CHALLENGES
DATA
FRAMEWORKS
DATA COLLECTION
DAT
A
ORG
ANIZ
ATIO
N
1
2
MODEL DISCOVERY
AND COMPLIANCE

The operationalize water
flows (volumes and quality)?
MISSING DATA ARE:
the account of water is based on the piped water from the
household houses
■ During the transport
■ Behind the dam reservoir (evaporation under the sun)
■ Water leaks in the pipes
■ The most important quantity (agriculture)
■ Flood (impervious surfaces)
■ Evapotranspiration of cities)
■ Underground waters
■ Stagnant waters (contaminated waters)
■ Etc.

Basic rate of water consumption
X 1.5
1975
2020
0.5 (100
YEARS)
R = 1 LITER PER ANNUM
(50 Liters in 50 years)
Source author adapted from internet, and Example of France, when the water
consumption, double after 1975
From the media attentions (internet):
CONSUMPTION IN VOLUMES (LITERS) PER INDIVIDUAL

BASIC WATER CONSUMPTION
STRATEGY:
FROM 30 GOLDEN YEARS (1945-
1975) TO 21ST CENTURY (2025)
1 volume (V) per 1 person (P)
1:V 1:P
1:1

WATER CONSUMPTION INCREASE SINCE END OF 30 GOLDEN YEARS
75 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25
150
140
130
120
110
100
1 LITER/ANNUM
VOLUMES (L)
YEARS
I HAVE
REARRANGED
THE DATA TO
MAKE A NEW
APPEARANCE
DATA LOG
WHICH A STRAIT
LINE CAN TO
UNDERSTAND
THE LINK
BETWEEN
NUMBER OF
YEARS AND
VOLUMES OF
WATER
CONSUMED
Basic strait line, Y (Volumes) = X (years)
Y (volumes)= X (years)
1:1

Is it the population dynamics? N2 >>N1
1900 2000
1950
100%
N1 N2
The strait
which is the
new format
of the data
collected
from the
internet and
media is
helping to
raise a first
assumption
about the
relevance of
population
dynamic and
water
consumption
Strategy change from 1:1 to 1:1.5
1:1 1:1.5
Population during
30 golden years
Water
consumed
Population after
30 golden years

DISCOVERY OF THE WATER
CONSUMPTION

The strategic evidence of the
assumption correlating the
Volumes, number of years and the
population increase.
It is the work of managers to
create new thinking and water
business models to innovate.

COMPARING THE DATA WITH
THE REAL WORLD OF WATER

I worked on a draft strategic cube, to assess my brainstorming to see some
fixes able to comply with given data by the media for a real world of water
Volume (V)
Population (N)
75
00
N1
N2= 65
Millions
1950
1950
2000
1975
2025
STEP 1/ DRAFT OF BUSINESS MODELING TESTING AND CALIBRATION
AUTHOR SELECTED CHOICE OF DATA
ORGANIZING (Y, V, N)
Years (Y)

As the performance
manager
■ You should be obsessed by the process vision based on 4
elements:
into
PERFOR
MANCE
DATA
internal
external
Flow controls and information
systems for goods, energy,
information's
What is your
organization about?
Source author from business
Management studies (MBA)

Population driver of water consumption?
N2 = 1.5 N1 => V2 = K. V1, K = N2/N1
5 millions
Y2 (1975) ???
100%
(R=1)
1900- 1975
N1
N2= 1.5 N1
105 liters
150 liters
K = 1.5
2025
ΔV
ΔV
ΔV
ΔV
WITH HAVE SEEN WITH COVID THE CONFUSION ABOUT DRIVERS OF ILLNESS, IT IS OFTEN THE CASE IN CLASSIC MANGEMENT PROJECT
BECAUSE IT IS BASED ON GROWHT- SO YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND AND BREAK DOWN PROCESS, TO FIND THE CAUSES AND
UNCERTAINTIES, IN ODER TO BUILD BACK BETTER

V1
V2 = 1.5 V1
1900- 1975
N1
1975 2025
2025
DIFFERENT REPRESENTATION OF THE
SAME MODEL, TO SHAPE THE REALITY
ON THE WATER, SUPPORT AND DATA
(SOURCES INTERNET)
LOGIC OF FLOW CONTROLS

Flow control and water
management
What has happened?

You can recognize the flow
logic
Flow
1975
Flow 21st
century
1975 2025
Flow in Flow out
?
The process black box helps to
understand the causes of flow
increases: V, N, Y….(others) ?

V H = 25
V D =
25
Volume V1
Before 1975
100 liters
ahead
Origin = N2 – N1
N1
None N2 None N1
1650?
The breakdown of the complexity is showing basic geometry relations on surfaces, which helped to understand that water consumption may not be
just a people process, and they unknowns that can explain the media data are correlated from others. Why some media referred to 1650 liters of
water per day, compare to, others about 150 liters per day. This mystery was raveled in the assessment with the strategic breakdown of water
consumption, per drivers, (people, years, number, volume…others)

Conclusion Hypothesis water consumption
is not only related to population growth (see Ahead)
K (N, Y) = 1.5 and K ( V, Y) = 1.5
■ Probably the water increase is due to Population increase
N
V
Y
1975
None N -> V
V(N)

My first assumption was smart because it was
basic, however, it could be wrong! The advantage
was to start to think about issues and how
measuring the water risks?
■ End considering que c’est l’augmention de la population
de 1.5 qui fait l’augmentation de la consummation d’eau
de 1.5
■ 1975 V1= 105 litres => N1
■ 2020 V2= 150 litres = N2
■ N2 est connu N2= 65 millions
■ Question que vaut N1, N1= [V1/V2 ]xN2
If you are not familiar with the French language, Google translate, can
help to translate into your own native language or english
A BASIC ASSUMPTION

A partir de cette hypothese
de N1 = V1/V2 x N2
■ Si je trouve des données sur la population de 1975 et avant qui
correspond a cette hypothese, mon assumption de depart etait la
bonne. C’est a dire que c’est l’augmentation de la population
après 1975 qui va entrainer l’accroissement de 50% de la
consummation d’eau d’avant 1975.
■ From the testing and calibration, I was enough satisfied by the first intuition about
the issue posed by the assumption, which evidence shows testing and calibration
was useful at that point of progress in the business modeling

Dans le doute de cette hypothese, j’ai ajouté
une petite incertitude (intuition peut être) qui
me dit qu’il peut etre autre chose que la simple
relation de croissance de la population dans un
facteur d’accroissement de 50%?
D’où l’hypothese d’un accroissement de besoin
d’eau non lié a l’accroissement de la population
To end the model. I added a an uncertainty element that I suspected would
help me to fill the gap in thinking about the water modeling based on the strait
line between population increase and volumes of water consumption. The
uncertainty is an uncertain gap, which I did not verify because of the lack of
time. But, please, give me a feed-back relevant to your own experimentation on
the matter gsradjou@outlook.com
Basic uncertainty

What is the real world of water?
(according to the media online
documents)
Planet.Fr La vie. Bio INSEE
130 liters
1800 liters 160 liters
Water
consumption
in France
Water
consump
tion in
FRANCE
(M) (m)
(A)
UNKNOWN-UNKNOWN
MODELS
UNKNOWN-
KNOWNS
MODELS
KNOWN
UNKNOWN
MODELS

What is the model that
complies with the reality of
water?
MODEL 1
For clarity? (how to extract the data)
to find the real world of water.
Model 1
m
M
A
M A m
MAm?
?
?
Model 2
MO
DEL
3

Question finale, pourquoi
faire tout ce travail de
reflexion?
■ Tout simplement parceque aucune donnée numérique du
volume en litre ne se ressemble.
■ INSEE: 130
■ Planet fr= 160
■ La vie. Bio=1800
■ (Last question, why this work has been done). It is a
management control applied to question of people needs for
water resources that are threatened at the time of climate
change)

WATER CONCEPTS
WATER ORGANIZATIONS
■ WATER IS MULTIDIMENSIONAL
■ MULTIREINFORCING
■ MULTILAYER
■ ….
■ WATER SOLIDARITY
FLOOD
WATER
NEXUS
?
FROM POTENTIAL
CONCEPTS TO
POTENTIAL WATER
ORGANIZATIONS
WHAT DATA ?
WHAT FOR DATA?

Hypothesis water consumption
only with population growth
Population Water
consumption
Per individual
How to
explain
the
water
gaps?
INSEE et la
Vie. Bio
La
planet fr
1800 liter par
personnel
130 (INSEE) 160 (Vie en Bio)
Consumption = population? (on peut
penser?
1650

What is the real world of
water?
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
REAL WORLD
OF WATER
DATA FROM
THE MEDIA
DOCUMENTS

CONCLUSION ABOUT THE
WATER ORGANIZATION FOR
ENHANCING WATER
■ WHAT IS THE WATER PROGRAM
USED BY THE ORGANIZATION
SUPPORTED BY THE MEDIA AND
INFORMATION SYSTEM THAT
PROVIDE THE DATA
WATER
PROGRAM FOR
WATER
MANAGEMENT
METHODS
KNOWNS
SLIDE 1-> SLIDE 35
UNKNOWNS
START STEP 2

THE NEED FOR A BASIC
WATER PROGRAM BEYOND
WATER CONSUMED IN
VOLUMES PER INDIVIDUAL
PER DAY
(WHO ARE THE REAL WATER
USERS?)
- Industries? Suppliers?
Manufactures?...Wastes?

Conclusion pour expliquer les écarts entre le différentes données
(INSEE 130, La vie. Bio 160, planet fr (1800) par des organisations
differentes don’t les flux en eaux sont très variables (en particulier
avec les données de la planète fr) et voir la performance du systeme
de l’utilization des ressources en eau
A partir de la, on pourra voir qu’elle est le modele qui conviendra la
mieux a a realité des besois en eau de la population a travers
l’information que j’ai receuilli sur internet,et voir quell est le type
d’organization, d’innovation qui va permettre d’améliorer la
ressource en eau.
Conclusion compare your business modeling with the media
data to find the diagnostic (good or bad), if you are close or away
with the water innovation to the real world of water
WATER PROGRAM? HOW WHATER IS USED
BY DIFFERENT SEGMENT OF SOCIETIES
BASIC WATER PROGRAMS

PERCEIVED PROGRAMS FROM
THE DIFFERENT MEDIA
1- SUPPLIERS
2- HUMAN RESSOURCE
3- PROCESSES
4- SALES
5- USERS
1
2
3
4
5 B
5A
5B
INDIVIDUAL
HOUSEHOLD
WATER CONSUMPTION PROGRAM
5A

CONCLUSION WATER
CONSUMPTION
SUPPORTED BY THE
MEDIA IS BASED
ONLY ON TWO
PROGRAMS: 5A + 5B
WATER DIAGNOSTIC: is it
the good water program?
TOWARD THE WATER TOTEM
DISCOVEVERY

The water model is a Water Totem that
programs from 1-4 is never used (they are
water unknowns)
SUPPLIERS RESOURCES
PROCESS SALES
5A 5B
?
?
?
Ok!
Ok!
1
2
3
4
5B
5A
A country water totem as
a real world of water
Media presentation with data log
supported by internet
5A+
5B

Then you can come to step 2
ORGANISING FOR A REAL WATER MODEL
■ The work of activism against the pre-concept and water
ideas of consumption, who consumes.
■ So, you can explain to others, what it is difficult to say
without taking a social risk.
■ It is at that time, you are transforming the world (by
improving, enhancing and building back better)
STEP 2A: WATER MODEL REAL WORLD DIAGNOSTIC
STEP 2B

THE REAL WATER MODEL
DATA DISCOVERY
KNOWNS
SLIDE 1- SLIDE 35
STEP 1
DATA FROM
THE MEDIA
INSEE
PLANET FR
LA VIE BIO
DATA FROM
GEOGRAPHIES
THE WATER
TOTEM
H20
HOUSEHOLDS
INDIVIUALS
FROM POTENTIAL STEPT 1 TO POTENTIAL STEP 2
STEP 2

ENHANCING THE WATER
CONSUMPTION ?
STEP 2 A: WATER MODEL
DIAGNOSTIC
COMPARING WHAT IS ARCHIEVD
WITH THE TOTEM MODEL, AND
WHAT SHOULD BE A WATER REAL
WORLD (SLIDE 46- STEP 2:
REDESIGNING THE DATA)
STEP 2B: WATER ENHANCING?

Travail a faire Est un travail de verification
des recensements des populations
pour connaitre les besoins
H20 consommé par la
population due a le
croissance
demographique
H20 consommé par la population due
a le croissance demographique au
chagement de mode de vie, nouveau
besoin….
H20 qui n’est pas comptabilisé (par
exemple, les agriculteurs ne consomment
pas l’eau alros que ce sont les plus gros
utilsateurs d’eau…
Before1975 After 1975
Step 2: you can redesign the statiscal surveil with the new chart is an histogram
with different areas for different water needs, and this part of the water
nnn
Disaggregation, beyond the simple fact that water is consumed per day per
individual 160 liters of water. Now, the new survey show the water diplomacy that
are hidden behind facts and communication to support data.

CONSUMPTION PER PERSON
■ Hhouseholds in France reached an all time high of 29.5
mil in 2019
■ 30 MILLIONS HOUSEHOLDS
■ HOUSEHOLDS= 2.5 PERSONS
■ => 80 LITERS PER INDIVIDUAL

INSEE DATA
■ 130 LITRES PER PERSON
■ 329 PER HOUSEHOLD (2.5 PERSONS)
■ utilisation annuelle de 120 mètres cubes
■ 120 CUBIC METERS PER ANNUM (PER HOUSEHOLD)

PLANET.FR
■ planet.fr warns of a lack of war.
■ 43 milliards de m3 par an consommés par la France (65
millions)
■ Stock d’eau (140 milliards/an)
■ 1800 litres consume per Day per individuel

DATA ORGANIZED PER
ORGANISATION AND VOLUMES
OF WATER CONSUMED
PLANET FR LAVIE.BIO INSEE
WATER
VOLUMES
(LITERS/PER
DAY.PERSON)
1800 160 130

WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROGRAM THE
ENHANCING IS LIMITED TO THE WATER USED PER
INDIVIDUAL?
MISSING DATA FOR THE PROGRAM: WATER BUDGET,
WATER INVESTMENT, WATER CHART, WATER
PRODUCTION, WATER NETWORK….
1600 LITERS
PER DAY PER
INDIVIDUAL
130 LITERS OF
WATER PER DAY
PER INDIVIDUAL
ENHANCING WATER
REAL WORLD ?

Thanks friends
■ Enjoy water!
■ Water is life and a danger
BIRD CEO contact:
GEORGES RADJOU
gsradjou@outlook.com

WATER CONSUMPTION.ppt

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to WATER CONSUMPTION.ppt

Similar to WATER CONSUMPTION.ppt (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

WATER CONSUMPTION.ppt