Bank regulations are needed to reduce risk in the banking system and promote stability. The Basel Accords established international capital standards to strengthen banks against losses and reduce competitive imbalances. Basel III further advanced these standards to be more risk-sensitive in response to financial innovation and globalization multiplying banking risks. Bank regulations aim to reduce risk exposure for bank creditors, systemic risk from multiple bank failures, criminal misuse of banks, and ensure fair treatment of customers.
Econometrics Analysis of Capital Adequacy Ratios and the Impact on Profitabil...iosrjce
This paper examines the econometrics analysis of capital adequacy ratios and the impact on the
profitability of Commercial Banks in Nigeria from 1980 – 2013. The objective is to investigate whether there is
a dynamic long run relationship between capital adequacy ratios and the profitability of commercial banks.
Time series data were sourced from Stock Exchange factbook and financial statement of quoted commercial
banks and the Johansen co-integration techniques in vector error correction model setting (VECM) as well as
the granger causality test were employed. The study has Return on Asset (ROA), Return on Investment (ROI)
and Return on Equity (ROE) as the dependent variables and the independent variables are Adjusted Capital to
Risk Asset Ratio (ACRR), Capital to Deposit Ratio (CTD), Capital to Net Loans and Advances Ratio (CNLAR),
Capital to Risk Asset Ratio (CRA) and Capital to Total Asset Ratio (CTAR). The empirical result demonstrated
vividly in the models that there is a positive long run dynamic and significant relationship between return on
asset and capital to risk asset ratio and capital to deposit ratio while others are negatively correlated. The
findings also revealed that there is bi-directional causality running from ROA to ACRR and ROA to CNLAR. We
therefore recommend that financial policies should be strengthened to deepen the capital base of Nigerian
Commercial banks to enhance bank profitability and sustain economic growth.
“Basel III is more about improving the risk management systems in the Banks than just Improved Quality and enhanced Quantity of capital”. Please discuss the challenges to the Indian Banks by March,2017
Alternative Finance Briefing Paper - Simon Deane-Johns 27 01 12Simon Deane-Johns
Submitted on 27 January 2012 to the UK Government's Red Tape Challenge on Disruptive Business Models (http://www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/themehome/disruptive-business-model/) and the Taskforce on Non-bank Finance (http://www.bis.gov.uk/businessfinance). Related posts are here: http://sdj-thefineprint.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/submission-on-new-model-for-retail.html
Financial Regulatory Reform: A New Foundation (1) Promote robust supervision and regulation of financial firms. Financial institutions that are critical to market functioning should be subject to strong oversight. No financial firm that poses a significant risk to the financial system should be unregulated or weakly regulated. We need clear accountability in financial oversight and supervision. We propose: • A new Financial Services Oversight Council of financial regulators to identify emerging systemic risks and improve interagency cooperation. • New authority for the Federal Reserve to supervise all firms that could pose a threat to financial stability, even those that do not own banks. • Stronger capital and other prudential standards for all financial firms, and even higher standards for large, interconnected firms. • A new National Bank Supervisor to supervise all federally chartered banks. • Elimination of the federal thrift charter and other loopholes that allowed some depository institutions to avoid bank holding company regulation by the Federal Reserve. • The registration of advisers of hedge funds and other private pools of capital with the SEC. (2) Establish comprehensive supervision of financial markets. Our major financial markets must be strong enough to withstand both system-wide stress and the failure of one or more large institutions. We propose: • Enhanced regulation of securitization markets, including new requirements for market transparency, stronger regulation of credit rating agencies, and a requirement that issuers and originators retain a financial interest in securitized loans. • Comprehensive regulation of all over-the-counter derivatives.
Econometrics Analysis of Capital Adequacy Ratios and the Impact on Profitabil...iosrjce
This paper examines the econometrics analysis of capital adequacy ratios and the impact on the
profitability of Commercial Banks in Nigeria from 1980 – 2013. The objective is to investigate whether there is
a dynamic long run relationship between capital adequacy ratios and the profitability of commercial banks.
Time series data were sourced from Stock Exchange factbook and financial statement of quoted commercial
banks and the Johansen co-integration techniques in vector error correction model setting (VECM) as well as
the granger causality test were employed. The study has Return on Asset (ROA), Return on Investment (ROI)
and Return on Equity (ROE) as the dependent variables and the independent variables are Adjusted Capital to
Risk Asset Ratio (ACRR), Capital to Deposit Ratio (CTD), Capital to Net Loans and Advances Ratio (CNLAR),
Capital to Risk Asset Ratio (CRA) and Capital to Total Asset Ratio (CTAR). The empirical result demonstrated
vividly in the models that there is a positive long run dynamic and significant relationship between return on
asset and capital to risk asset ratio and capital to deposit ratio while others are negatively correlated. The
findings also revealed that there is bi-directional causality running from ROA to ACRR and ROA to CNLAR. We
therefore recommend that financial policies should be strengthened to deepen the capital base of Nigerian
Commercial banks to enhance bank profitability and sustain economic growth.
“Basel III is more about improving the risk management systems in the Banks than just Improved Quality and enhanced Quantity of capital”. Please discuss the challenges to the Indian Banks by March,2017
Alternative Finance Briefing Paper - Simon Deane-Johns 27 01 12Simon Deane-Johns
Submitted on 27 January 2012 to the UK Government's Red Tape Challenge on Disruptive Business Models (http://www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/themehome/disruptive-business-model/) and the Taskforce on Non-bank Finance (http://www.bis.gov.uk/businessfinance). Related posts are here: http://sdj-thefineprint.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/submission-on-new-model-for-retail.html
Financial Regulatory Reform: A New Foundation (1) Promote robust supervision and regulation of financial firms. Financial institutions that are critical to market functioning should be subject to strong oversight. No financial firm that poses a significant risk to the financial system should be unregulated or weakly regulated. We need clear accountability in financial oversight and supervision. We propose: • A new Financial Services Oversight Council of financial regulators to identify emerging systemic risks and improve interagency cooperation. • New authority for the Federal Reserve to supervise all firms that could pose a threat to financial stability, even those that do not own banks. • Stronger capital and other prudential standards for all financial firms, and even higher standards for large, interconnected firms. • A new National Bank Supervisor to supervise all federally chartered banks. • Elimination of the federal thrift charter and other loopholes that allowed some depository institutions to avoid bank holding company regulation by the Federal Reserve. • The registration of advisers of hedge funds and other private pools of capital with the SEC. (2) Establish comprehensive supervision of financial markets. Our major financial markets must be strong enough to withstand both system-wide stress and the failure of one or more large institutions. We propose: • Enhanced regulation of securitization markets, including new requirements for market transparency, stronger regulation of credit rating agencies, and a requirement that issuers and originators retain a financial interest in securitized loans. • Comprehensive regulation of all over-the-counter derivatives.
Mercer Capital's Bank Watch | August 2019 | Community Bank Valuation (Part 2)Mercer Capital
Brought to you by the Financial Institutions Team of Mercer Capital, this monthly newsletter is focused on bank activity in five U.S. regions. Bank Watch highlights various banking metrics, including public market indicators, M&A market indicators, and key indices of the top financial institutions, providing insight into financial institution valuation issues.
High regulatory costs for small and mid sized banksHEXANIKA
Anecdotal evidence from bankers suggests that the cost of complying usually increases with new rules and regulations when large statutory changes are made to financial laws and rules of any country or region[1]. This burden increases significantly when such changes are made especially after a financial crisis. New regulations stemming from the financial crisis has cost the six largest U.S. banks $70.2 billion as of the end of last year[2]. Between the end of 2007 and the end of 2015, regulatory fines rose by more than 100% – or $35.5 billion- according to data from policy-analysis firm Federal Financial Analytics Inc. As per Federal Financial Analytics, the reporting costs come from a mix of requirements that are specific to these banks, e.g. particular capital surcharges that apply to banks with assets over $50 billion but impose the largest cost on the six biggest banks due to their size or risk
MTBiz is for you if you are looking for contemporary information on business, economy and especially on banking industry of Bangladesh. You would also find periodical information on Global Economy and Commodity Markets.
Signature content of MTBiz is its Article of the Month (AoM), as depicted on Cover Page of each issue, with featured focus on different issues that fall into the wide definition of Market, Business, Organization and Leadership. The AoM also covers areas on Innovation, Central Banking, Monetary Policy, National Budget, Economic Depression or Growth and Capital Market. Scale of coverage of the AoM both, global and local subject to each issue.
MTBiz is a monthly Market Review produced and distributed by Group R&D, MTB since 2009.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
2. Certified Basel III Professional
www.vskills.in Page 2
1. BANK REGULATION AND BASEL ACCORDS
The chapter discusses the need for bank regulations and their impact for evolution of BASEL
accords.
1.1. What are Bank Regulation
Bank regulation is a form of government regulation which subjects banks to certain requirements,
restrictions and guidelines, designed to create market transparency between banking institutions
and the individuals and corporations with whom they conduct business, among other things.
Given the interconnectedness of the banking industry and the reliance that the national (and
global) economy hold on banks, it is important for regulatory agencies to maintain control over the
standardized practices of these institutions. Supporters of such regulation often base their
arguments on the "too big to fail" notion. This holds that many financial institutions (particularly
investment banks with a commercial arm) hold too much control over the economy to fail without
enormous consequences. This is the premise for government bailouts, in which government
financial assistance is provided to banks or other financial institutions who appear to be on the
brink of collapse. The belief is that without this aid, the crippled banks would not only become
bankrupt, but would create rippling effects throughout the economy leading to systemic failure.
The objectives of bank regulation, and the emphasis, vary between jurisdictions. The most
common objectives are:
prudential — to reduce the level of risk to which bank creditors are exposed (i.e. to protect
depositors)
systemic risk reduction — to reduce the risk of disruption resulting from adverse trading
conditions for banks causing multiple or major bank failures
to avoid misuse of banks — to reduce the risk of banks being used for criminal purposes, e.g.
laundering the proceeds of crime
to protect banking confidentiality
credit allocation — to direct credit to favored sectors
it may also include rules about treating customers fairly and having corporate social
responsibility.
General principles of bank regulation
Banking regulations vary widely between jurisdictions and are as
Licensing and supervision - Banks usually require a banking license from a national bank
regulator before they are permitted to carry on a banking business, whether within the
jurisdiction or as an offshore bank. The regulator supervises licensed banks for compliance
with the requirements and responds to breaches of the requirements by obtaining
undertakings, giving directions, imposing penalties or (ultimately) revoking the bank's license.
Minimum requirements - A national bank regulator imposes requirements on banks in order
to promote the objectives of the regulator. Often, these requirements are closely tied to the
level of risk exposure for a certain sector of the bank. The most important minimum
requirement in banking regulation is maintaining minimum capital ratios. To some extent, U.S.
banks have some leeway in determining who will supervise and regulate them.
3. Certified Basel III Professional
www.vskills.in Page 3
Market discipline - The regulator requires banks to publicly disclose financial and other
information, and depositors and other creditors are able to use this information to assess the
level of risk and to make investment decisions. As a result of this, the bank is subject to market
discipline and the regulator can also use market pricing information as an indicator of the
bank's financial health.
Instruments and requirements of bank regulation
Capital requirement - The capital requirement sets a framework on how banks must handle their
capital in relation to their assets. Internationally, the Bank for International Settlements' Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision influences each country's capital requirements. In 1988, the
Committee decided to introduce a capital measurement system commonly referred to as the Basel
Capital Accords. The latest capital adequacy framework is commonly known as Basel III. This
updated framework is intended to be more risk sensitive than the original one, but is also a lot
more complex.
Reserve requirement - The reserve requirement sets the minimum reserves each bank must hold
to demand deposits and banknotes. This type of regulation has lost the role it once had, as the
emphasis has moved toward capital adequacy, and in many countries there is no minimum reserve
ratio. The purpose of minimum reserve ratios is liquidity rather than safety. An example of a
country with a contemporary minimum reserve ratio is Hong Kong, where banks are required to
maintain 25% of their liabilities that are due on demand or within 1 month as qualifying liquefiable
assets.
Reserve requirements have also been used in the past to control the stock of banknotes and/or
bank deposits. Required reserves have at times been gold, central bank banknotes or deposits, and
foreign currency.
Corporate governance - Corporate governance requirements are intended to encourage the bank
to be well managed, and is an indirect way of achieving other objectives! As many banks are
relatively large, with many divisions, it is important for management to maintain a close watch on
all operations. Investors and clients will often hold higher management accountable for missteps,
as these individuals are expected to be aware of all activities of the institution. Some of these
requirements may include:
to be a body corporate (i.e. not an individual, a partnership, trust or other unincorporated
entity)
to be incorporated locally, and/or to be incorporated under as a particular type of body
corporate, rather than being incorporated in a foreign jurisdiction
to have a minimum number of directors
to have an organisational structure that includes various offices and officers, e.g. corporate
secretary, treasurer/CFO, auditor, Asset Liability Management Committee, Privacy Officer,
Compliance Officer etc. Also the officers for those offices may need to be approved persons,
or from an approved class of persons
to have a constitution or articles of association that is approved, or contains or does not contain
particular clauses, e.g. clauses that enable directors to act other than in the best interests of the
company (e.g. in the interests of a parent company) may not be allowed.
4. Certified Basel III Professional
www.vskills.in Page 4
Financial reporting and disclosure requirements - Among the most important regulations that are
placed on banking institutions is the requirement for disclosure of the bank's finances. Particularly
for banks that trade on the public market, in the US for example the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) requires management to prepare annual financial statements according to a
financial reporting standard, have them audited, and to register or publish them. Often, these
banks are even required to prepare more frequent financial disclosures, such as Quarterly
Disclosure Statements. The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 outlines in detail the exact structure of
the reports that the SEC requires.
In addition to preparing these statements, the SEC also stipulates that directors of the bank must
attest to the accuracy of such financial disclosures. Thus, included in their annual reports must be a
report of management on the company's internal control over financial reporting. The internal
control report must include: a statement of management's responsibility for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company; management's
assessment of the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting as of the
end of the company's most recent fiscal year; a statement identifying the framework used by
management to evaluate the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial
reporting; and a statement that the registered public accounting firm that audited the company's
financial statements included in the annual report has issued an attestation report on management's
assessment of the company's internal control over financial reporting. Under the new rules, a
company is required to file the registered public accounting firm's attestation report as part of the
annual report. Furthermore, the SEC added a requirement that management evaluate any change
in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during a fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control
over financial reporting.
Credit rating requirement - Banks may be required to obtain and maintain a current credit rating
from an approved credit rating agency, and to disclose it to investors and prospective investors.
Also, banks may be required to maintain a minimum credit rating. These ratings are designed to
provide color for prospective clients or investors regarding the relative risk that one assumes when
engaging in business with the bank. The ratings reflect the tendencies of the bank to take on high
risk endeavors, in addition to the likelihood of succeeding in such deals or initiatives. The rating
agencies that banks are most strictly governed by, referred to as the "Big Three" are the Fitch
Group, Standard and Poor's and Moody's. These agencies hold the most influence over how banks
(and all public companies) are viewed by those engaged in the public market. In recent years,
following the Great Recession, many economists have argued that these agencies face a serious
conflict of interest in their core business model. Clients pay these agencies to rate their company
based on their relative riskiness in the market. The question then is, to whom is the agency
providing its service: the company or the market?
European financial economics experts – notably the World Pensions Council (WPC) have argued
that European powers such as France and Germany pushed dogmatically and naively for the
adoption of the "Basel II recommendations", adopted in 2005, transposed in European Union law
through the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD). In essence, they forced European banks, and,
more importantly, the European Central Bank itself, to rely more than ever on the standardized
assessments of "credit risk" marketed aggressively by two US credit rating agencies – Moody's and
S&P, thus using public policy and ultimately taxpayers' money to strengthen anti-competitive
5. Certified Basel III Professional
www.vskills.in Page 5
duopolistic practices akin to exclusive dealing. Ironically, European governments have abdicated
most of their regulatory authority in favor of a non-European, highly deregulated, private cartel.
Large exposures restrictions - Banks may be restricted from having imprudently large exposures to
individual counterparties or groups of connected counterparties. Such limitation may be expressed
as a proportion of the bank's assets or equity, and different limits may apply based on the security
held and/or the credit rating of the counterparty. Restricting disproportionate exposure to high-risk
investment prevents financial institutions from placing equity holders' (as well as the firm's) capital
at an unnecessary risk.
Activity and affiliation restrictions - In the US in response to the Great depression of the 1930s,
President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s under the New Deal enacted the Securities Act of 1933 and the
Glass–Steagall Act (GSA), setting up a pervasive regulatory scheme for the public offering of
securities and generally prohibiting commercial banks from underwriting and dealing in those
securities. GSA prohibited affiliations between banks (which means bank-chartered depository
institutions, that is, financial institutions that hold federally insured consumer deposits) and
securities firms (which are commonly referred to as “investment banks” even though they are not
technically banks and do not hold federally insured consumer deposits); further restrictions on
bank affiliations with non-banking firms were enacted in Bank Holding Company Act of 1956
(BHCA) and its subsequent amendments, eliminating the possibility that companies owning banks
would be permitted to take ownership or controlling interest in insurance companies,
manufacturing companies, real estate companies, securities firms, or any other non-banking
company. As a result, distinct regulatory systems developed in the United States for regulating
banks, on the one hand, and securities firms on the other.
1.2. Why Banking regulations needed
Globalisation and financial innovation have over the last two decades or more multiplied and
diversified the risks carried by the banking system. In response, the regulation of banking in the
developed industrial countries has increasingly focused on ensuring financial stability, at the
expense of regulation geared to realising growth and equity objectives. The appropriateness of this
move is being debated even in the developed countries, which in any case are at a completely
different level of development of their economies and of the extent of financial deepening and
intermediation as compared to the developing world.
The Basel Committee has two main reasons for proposing its Basel framework:
to strengthen international banking by boosting their capital requirements
to remove inter-country competitive inequalities amongst G-10 banking institutions
At the centre of BASEL guidelines is an effort to estimate how much of capital assets of specified
kinds should banks hold to absorb losses. This requires some assessment of likely losses that may
be incurred and deciding on a proportion of liquid assets that banks must have at hand to meet
those losses in case they are incurred. This required regulatory capital is defined in terms "tiers" of
capital that are characterised by differing degrees of liquidity and capacity to absorb losses. The
highest, Tier I, consists principally of the equity and recorded reserves of the bank.
6. Certified Basel III Professional
www.vskills.in Page 6
Risk and BASEL
Banks face high risks primarily because banking is one of the most highly leveraged sectors of any
economy. To tackle risk and function efficiently, there is a need to manage all kinds of risk
associated with banking. Thus, risk management is core to any banking service. The ability to
gauge risk and take appropriate action is the key to success for any bank. It is said that risk-takers
survive, effective risk managers prosper and the risk- averse perish. The same holds for the
banking industry. The axiom that holds good for all business is "No Risk No Gain".
A bank’s real capital worth is evaluated after taking into account the riskiness of its assets. It was
earlier hoped that the capital would provide banks with a comfortable cushion against insolvency,
thereby ensuring market stability. In the wake of the introduction of prudential regulation as an
integral part of financial sector reforms in India, there has been a growing debate as to whether
capital adequacy requirements are the best means to regulate the banking system. From cross
country experiences, there is some evidence of a positive association between capitalisation and
risk assumption by banks due to the possibility that the one-size-fits-all CAR causes bank leverage
and asset risk to become substitutes. At policy levels, this has driven research into alternative
regulatory methods.
The higher the risk of loss associated with an investment the more of it must be covered in this
manner, requiring assets to be risk-weighted. A 100 per cent risk loss implies that the whole of an
investment can be lost under certain contingencies and a zero per cent risk-weight implies that the
asset concerned is riskless.
Bank Failure
A bank failure occurs when a bank is unable to meet its obligations to its depositors or other
creditors because it has become insolvent or too illiquid to meet its liabilities. More specifically, a
bank usually fails economically when the market value of its assets declines to a value that is less
than the market value of its liabilities. The insolvent bank either borrows from other solvent banks
or sells its assets at a lower price than its market value to generate liquid money to pay its
depositors on demand. The inability of the solvent banks to lend liquid money to the insolvent
bank creates a bank panic among the depositors as more depositors try to take out cash deposits
from the bank. As such, the bank is unable to fulfill the demands of all of its depositors on time.
Also, a bank may be taken over by the regulating government agency if Shareholders Equity (i.e.
capital ratios) are below the regulatory minimum.
The failure of a bank is generally considered to be of more importance than the failure of other
types of business firms because of the interconnectedness and fragility of banking institutions.
Research has shown that the market value of customers of the failed banks is adversely affected at
the date of the failure announcements. It is often feared that the spillover effects of a failure of one
bank can quickly spread throughout the economy and possibly result in the failure of other banks,
whether or not those banks were solvent at the time as the marginal depositors try to take out cash
deposits from these banks to avoid from suffering losses. Thereby, the spillover effect of bank
panic or systemic risk has a multiplier effect on all banks and financial institutions leading to a
greater effect of bank failure in the economy. As a result, banking institutions are typically
subjected to rigorous regulation, and bank failures are of major public policy concern in countries
across the world.
7. Certified Basel III Professional
www.vskills.in Page 7
Bank run and panic
A bank run (also known as a run on the bank) occurs when in a fractional-reserve banking system
(where banks normally only keep a small proportion of their assets as cash), a large number of
customers withdraw cash from deposit accounts with a financial institution at the same time
because they believe that the financial institution is, or might become, insolvent; and keep the cash
or transfer it into other assets, such as government bonds, precious metals or gemstones. When
they transfer funds to another institution it may be characterised as a capital flight. As a bank run
progresses, it generates its own momentum: as more people withdraw cash, the likelihood of
default increases, triggering further withdrawals. This can destabilize the bank to the point where it
runs out of cash and thus faces sudden bankruptcy. To combat a bank run, a bank may limit how
much cash each customer may withdraw, suspend withdrawals altogether, or promptly acquire
more cash from other banks or from the central bank, besides other measures.
A banking panic or bank panic is a financial crisis that occurs when many banks suffer runs at the
same time, as people suddenly try to convert their threatened deposits into cash or try to get out of
their domestic banking system altogether. A systemic banking crisis is one where all or almost all of
the banking capital in a country is wiped out. The resulting chain of bankruptcies can cause a long
economic recession as domestic businesses and consumers are starved of capital as the domestic
banking system shuts down. According to former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke,
the Great Depression was caused by the Federal Reserve System, and much of the economic
damage was caused directly by bank runs. The cost of cleaning up a systemic banking crisis can be
huge, with fiscal costs averaging 13% of GDP and economic output losses averaging 20% of GDP
for important crises from 1970 to 2007.
Several techniques have been used to try to prevent bank runs or mitigate their effects. They have
included a higher reserve requirement (requiring banks to keep more of their reserves as cash),
government bailouts of banks, supervision and regulation of commercial banks, the organization of
central banks that act as a lender of last resort, the protection of deposit insurance systems such as
the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and after a run has started, a temporary
suspension of withdrawals. These techniques do not always work: for example, even with deposit
insurance, depositors may still be motivated by beliefs they may lack immediate access to deposits
during a bank reorganization.
1.3. What are Basel Accords
The Basel Accords refer to the banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking
regulations)—Basel I, Basel II and Basel III—issued by the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision (BCBS). They are called the Basel Accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at
the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland and the committee normally meets
there. The Basel Accords is a set of recommendations for regulations in the banking industry.
1.4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is a committee of banking supervisory
authorities that was established by the central bank governors of the Group of Ten countries in
1974. It provides a forum for regular cooperation on banking supervisory matters. Its objective is
to enhance understanding of key supervisory issues and improve the quality of banking supervision
worldwide. The Committee frames guidelines and standards in different areas - some of the better
8. Certified Basel III Professional
www.vskills.in Page 8
known among them are the international standards on capital adequacy, the Core Principles for
Effective Banking Supervision and the Concordat on cross-border banking supervision. The
Committee's Secretariat is located at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel,
Switzerland. However, the BIS and the Basel Committee remain two distinct entities.
The purpose of BCBS is to encourage convergence toward common approaches and standards.
The Committee is not a classical multilateral organization, in part because it has no founding
treaty. BCBS does not issue binding regulation; rather, it functions as an informal forum in which
policy solutions and standards are developed.
The Basel Committee formulates broad supervisory standards and guidelines and recommends
statements of best practice in banking supervision (see bank regulation or "Basel III Accord", for
example) in the expectation that member authorities and other nations' authorities will take steps to
implement them through their own national systems.
The Basel Committee
Formerly, the Basel Committee consisted of representatives from central banks and regulatory
authorities of the Group of Ten countries plus Luxembourg and Spain. Since 2009, all of the other
G-20 major economies are represented, as well as some other major banking locales such as Hong
Kong and Singapore.
The committee does not have the authority to enforce recommendations, although most member
countries as well as some other countries tend to implement the Committee's policies. This means
that recommendations are enforced through national (or EU-wide) laws and regulations, rather
than as a result of the committee's recommendations - thus some time may pass between
recommendations and implementation as law at the national level.
The Basel Committee is named after the city of Basel, Switzerland. In early publications, the
Committee sometimes used the British spelling "Basle" or the French spelling "Bâle," names that
are sometimes still used in the media. More recently, the Committee has deferred to the
predominantly German-speaking population of the region and used the spelling "Basel", which is
also a common spelling in English.
Organization
The Basel committee along with its sister organizations, the International Organization of
Securities Commissions and International Association of Insurance Supervisors together make up
the Joint Forum of international financial regulators
Member Countries
Committee members come from Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France,
Germany, Hong Kong SAR, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the
Netherlands, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey,
the United Kingdom and the United States. The Committee's Secretariat is located at the Bank for
International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland. However, the BIS and the Basel Committee
remain two distinct entities.
9. Certified Basel III Professional
www.vskills.in Page 9
Groups
The Committee is sub-divided into groups, each of which have specific task forces to work on
specific issues:
The Standards Implementation Group (SIG)
Operational Risk Subgroup - addresses issues related to Advanced Measurement
Approach for Operational Risk
Task Force on Colleges - develops guidance on the Basel Committee's work on supervisory
colleges
Task Force on Remuneration - promotes the adoption of sound remuneration practices
Standards Monitoring Procedures Task Force - develops procedures to achieve greater
effectiveness and consistency in standards monitoring and implementation
The Policy Development Group (PDG)
Risk Management and Modeling Group - point of contact with the industry on the latest
advances in risk measurement and management
Research Task Force - facilitates economists from member institutions to discuss research
on financial stability in consultation with the academic sector
Trading Book Group - reviews how risks in the trading book should be captured by
regulatory capital
Working Group on Liquidity - works on global standards for liquidity risk management
and regulation
Definition of Capital Subgroup - reviews eligible capital instruments
Capital Monitoring Group - co-ordinates the expertise of national supervisor in monitoring
capital requirements
Cross-border Bank Resolution Group - compares the national policies, legal frameworks
and the allocation of responsibilities for the resolution of banks with significant cross-
border operations
The Accounting Task Force (ATF) - ensures that accounting and auditing standards help
promote sound risk management thereby maintaining the safety and soundness of the banking
system
Audit subgroup - explores key audit issues and co-ordinates with other bodies to promote
standards
The Basel Consultative Group (BCG) - facilitates engagement between banking supervisors
including dialogue with non-member countries