Orange County Lippo Cikarang merupakan sebuah superblok terbaru dari Lippo yang menempel dengan pintu tol Cibatu - Karawang.
Dikelilingi oleh darerah Industrial yang luas dan banyak ditempati oleh expatriat dari berbagai negara yang terus-menerus berinvestasi di Indonesia
Untuk pemesanan hubungi : 021 3333 9789 atau 0857 807 708 78
Orange County Lippo Cikarang merupakan sebuah superblok terbaru dari Lippo yang menempel dengan pintu tol Cibatu - Karawang.
Dikelilingi oleh darerah Industrial yang luas dan banyak ditempati oleh expatriat dari berbagai negara yang terus-menerus berinvestasi di Indonesia
Untuk pemesanan hubungi : 021 3333 9789 atau 0857 807 708 78
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Vocab Flash Cards
1. 1 1
General Rule: General Rule:
behavior be concrete
write-out/review term
1 1
Concept: Concept:
behavior analysis reinforcer
write-out/review term (positive reinforcer)
write-out/review term
1 1
Concept: General Rule:
repertoire dead-man test
1 2
General Rule: Concept:
check the presumed baseline
reinforcer first write-out/review term
2. • Always pinpoint specific • A muscle, glandular, or
behaviors neuro-electrical activity.
• when you deal with a
behavioral (psychological)
problem.
• A stimulus • The study of the
• that increases the frequency • principles of behavior.
of a response it follows.
• If a dead man can do it, it • A set of skills.
probably isn’t behavior.
• The phase of an experiment • Before spending much time
or intervention trying to reinforce behavior,
• where the behavior is • make sure you have a true
measured reinforcer.
• in the absence of an
intervention.
3. 2 2
Concept: Concept:
medical model myth behavioral contingency
2 2
Concept: General Rule:
reinforcement contingency the don't say rule
write-out/review term
2 2
Concept: General Rule:
the error of reification reinforce behavior
3 3
Concept: Concept:
escape contingency aversive stimulus
write-out/review term (negative reinforcer)
write-out/review term
4. • The occasion for a response, • An erroneous view of
• the response, and human behavior
• the outcome of the response. • that behavior is always a
mere symptom of
• an underlying psychological
condition.
• With nonverbal organisms, • The response-contingent
don't say, • presentation
• expects,
• knows, • of a reinforcer
• thinks,
• figures out, • resulting in an increased
• in order to (or so that he,
she, or it could ...), frequency of that response.
• trying to,
• makes the connection,
• associates,
• learns that,
• imagines,
• or understands.
• Reinforce behavior, • To call a behavior or
• not people. process a thing.
• A stimulus • The response-contingent
• that increases the future • removal of
frequency of a response • an aversive stimulus
• its removal (termination) • resulting in an increased
follows. frequency of that response.
5. 3 3
Concept: False General Rule:
differential reinforcement the toothpaste theory
of alternative behavior (DRA) of abnormal behavior
write-out/review term
3 3
Concept: Principle:
functional assessment parsimony
write-out/review term
3 4
General Rule: General Rule:
the sick social cycle the sick social cycle
(victim’s escape model) (victim’s punishment model)
4 4
Concept: Concept:
punishment contingency overcorrection
write-out/review term
6. • Abnormal behavior flows out • The replacement of an
of sick people inappropriate response
• like toothpaste squeezed • with a specific appropriate
from a tube. response
• The abnormal behavior • that produces the same
results from inner pressure. reinforcing outcome.
• The use of no unnecessary • An assessment
concepts, principles, or • of the contingencies
assumptions. • responsible for
• behavioral problems.
• The perpetrator’s aversive • In escaping
behavior punishes • the perpetrator’s aversive
• the victim’s appropriate behavior,
behavior. • the victim unintentionally
• And the victim’s stopping the reinforces
appropriate behavior • that aversive behavior.
• unintentionally reinforces
that aversive behavior.
• A contingency • Response-contingent
• on inappropriate behavior • presentation of
• requiring the person • an aversive condition
• to engage in an effortful (negative reinforcer)
response • resulting in a decreased
• that more than corrects frequency of that response.
• the effects of inappropriate
behavior.
7. 4 4
Concept: Concept:
dependent variable informed consent
write-out/review term
4 4
Concept: Concept:
independent variable social validity
write-out/review term write-out/review term
4 4
Concept: Concept:
multiple baseline design reliability measurement
5 5
Concept: Concept:
penalty contingency response-cost contingency
write-out/review term write-out/review term
8. • Consent to intervene in a • A measure of the subject's
way behavior.
• that is experimental or
• risky.
• The participant or guardian
• is informed of the risks and
benefits
• and of the right to stop the
• The goals, • The variable the
• procedures, and experimenter systematically
• results of an intervention manipulates
• are socially acceptable to • to influence the dependent
• the client, variable.
• the behavior analyst, and
• society.
• The comparison of • An experimental design
measurements • in which the replications
• of dependent variables and involve
• independent variables • baselines of differing
• obtained by independent durations
observers. • and interventions of differing
starting times.
• The response-contingent • The
• removal of • response-contingent
• a tangible reinforcer. • removal of
• a reinforcer (positive
reinforcer)
• resulting in a decreased
frequency of that response.
9. 5 5
Concept: Concept:
time-out contingency reversal design
write-out/review term
5 6
Principle: Principle:
the law of effect recovery from punishment
write-out/review term write-out/review term
6 6
Principle: Concept:
spontaneous recovery forgetting procedure
write-out/review term
6 6
Principle: General Rule:
extinction Forget Forgetting
write-out/review term
10. • An experimental design • The response-contingent
• in which we reverse • removal of
• between intervention and • access to a reinforcer.
baseline conditions
• to assess the effects of those
conditions.
• Stopping the punishment or • The effects of our actions
penalty contingency • determine whether we will
• for a previously punished repeat them.
response
• may cause the response
frequency to increase
• to its frequency before the
punishment or penalty
• Preventing the opportunity • A temporary recovery of the
(or occasion) for a response. extinguished behavior
• during the first part of each
of the extinction sessions
• that follow the first extinction
session.
• There’s no such thing. • Stopping the reinforcement
or escape contingency
• for a previously reinforced
response
• causes the response
frequency to decrease.
11. 6 6
Concept: Concept:
to confound variables control condition
write-out/review term
7 7
Concept: Concept:
response topography Latency
write-out/review term write-out/review term
7 7
Concept: Concept:
task analysis duration
write-out/review term
7 7
General Rule: Concept:
process vs. product response dimensions
12. • A condition not containing • To change or allow to
the presumed crucial value change two or more
of the independent variable. independent variables at the
same time,
• so you cannot determine
what variables are
responsible for the change
in the dependent variable.
• The time between • The sequence (path of
• the signal or opportunity for movement),
a response • form,
• and the beginning of the • or location
response. • of components of a
response
• relative to the rest of the
body
• An analysis of complex
• The time from behavior
• the beginning • and sequences of behavior
• to the end • into their component
• of a response. responses.
• The physical properties of a • Sometimes you need to
response. • make reinforcers and
feedback contingent on
• the component responses of
the process,
• not just the product
(outcome).
13. 7 7
Concept: Concept:
response class single-subject
write-out/review term research design
write-out/review term
7 7
Procedure: Concept:
the differential- group research design
reinforcement
procedure
write-out/review term
7 7
Concept: Concept:
the differential punishment control group
procedure
7 8
Concept: Concept:
experimental group fixed-outcome shaping
14. • The entire experiment is • A set of responses that
conducted with a single either
subject, • a) are similar on at least one
• though it may be replicated response dimension, or
with several other subjects. • b) share the effects of
reinforcement and
punishment, or
• c) serve the same function
(produce the same
• The experiment is conducted • Reinforcing one set of
with at least two groups of responses and
subjects. • withholding reinforcement
• And the data are usually for another set of
presented in terms of the responses.
mean (average)
• of the performance of all
subjects
• A group of subjects • Punishing one set of
• not exposed to the presumed responses
crucial value of the • and withholding punishment
independent variable. of another set of responses.
• Shaping that involves • A group of subjects
• no change in the value of • exposed to the presumed
• the reinforcer crucial value
• or aversive condition, • of the independent variable.
• as the performance criterion
more and more closely
resembles the terminal
behavior.
15. 8 8
Concept: Concept:
terminal behavior shaping
write-out/review term with reinforcement
write-out/review term
8 8
Concept: Concept:
operant level shaping
with punishment
8 8
Concept: Concept:
initial behavior variable-outcome
shaping
write-out/review term
8 9
Concept: Concept:
intermediate behavior unlearned aversive
condition
16. • The differential • Behavior not in the
reinforcement of only that repertoire
behavior • or not occurring at the
• that more and more closely desired frequency;
resembles the terminal • the goal of the intervention
behavior.
• The differential punishment • The frequency of
of all behavior responding
• except that which more and • before reinforcement
more closely resembles the
terminal behavior.
• Shaping that involves • Behavior that resembles
• a change in the value of • the terminal behavior
• the reinforcer • along some meaningful
• or aversive condition, dimension
• as performance more and • and occurs with at least a
more closely resembles the minimal frequency.
• terminal behavior.
• A stimulus that is aversive, • Behavior that more closely
• though not as a result of approximates the terminal
pairing with other aversive behavior.
stimuli.
17. 9 9
Concept: Procedure:
unlearned reinforcer motivating operation
write-out/review term write-out/review term
9 9
Principle: Principle:
Satiation Premack principle
write-out/review term write-out/review term
9 10
Principle: Concept:
Deprivation addictive reinforcer
write-out/review term
10 10
Concept: Principle:
aggression reinforcer the aggression principle
18. • A stimulus that is a
• A procedure or condition reinforcer,
• that affects learning and • though not as a result of
performance pairing with another
• with respect to a particular reinforcer.
reinforcer or aversive
condition.
• If one activity occurs more • Consuming a substantial
often than another, amount of a reinforcer
• the opportunity to do the • temporarily decreases
more frequent activity relevant learning and
• will reinforce the less performance.
frequent activity.
• A reinforcer for which • Withholding a reinforcer
• repeated exposure • increases relevant learning
• is an motivating operation. and performance.
• Aversive stimuli and • Stimuli resulting from acts of
extinction are motivating aggression.
operations
• for aggression reinforcers.
19. 11
11 Concept:
Concept: generalized learned reinforcer
conditional stimulus (generalized
secondary/conditioned reinforcer)
write-out/review term
11 11
Concept: Concept:
learned reinforcer token economy
(secondary or conditioned write-out/review term
reinforcer)
write-out/review term
11 11
Procedure: Concept:
pairing procedure learned aversive stimulus
11 12
Principle: Concept:
value-altering principle verbal behavior
write-out/review term
20. • A learned reinforcer that is a • Elements of a stimulus
reinforcer • have their value or function
• because it has been paired • only when they are
with a variety of other combined;
reinforcers. • otherwise, the individual
elements may be relatively
neutral.
• A system of generalized • A stimulus that is a
learned reinforcers reinforcer
• in which the organism that • because it has been paired
receives those generalized with another reinforcer.
reinforcers can save them
• and exchange them for a
variety of backup reinforcers
later.
• A stimulus • The pairing of a neutral
• that is aversive stimulus with
• because it has been paired • a reinforcer or aversive
with another aversive stimulus.
stimulus.
• The behavioral term for • The pairing procedure
language • converts a neutral stimulus
into
• a learned reinforcer
• or learned aversive
stimulus.
21. 12 12
Concept: Concept:
discriminative stimulus (SD) stimulus discrimination
write-out/review term (stimulus control)
12 12
Concept: Concept:
S-delta (S∆) incidental teaching
write-out/review term
12 12
Criteria for diagraming Concept:
Discriminated Contingencies: Prompt
S∆ contingency test write-out/review term
12 12
Concept: Concept:
discrimination training operandum (manipulandum)
procedure write-out/review term
write-out/review term
22. • The occurrence of a • A stimulus in the presence
response more frequently in of which
the presence of one stimulus • a particular response will be
• than in the presence of reinforced or punished.
another,
• usually as a result of a
discrimination training
procedure.
• The planned use of • A stimulus in the presence
• behavioral contingencies, of which
• differential reinforcement, • a particular response will not
and be reinforced or punished.
• discrimination training
• in the student’s everyday
environment.
• A supplemental stimulus • Is there also an S∆?
• that raises the probability of • (If not, then you also don’t
a correct response. have an SD).
• That part of the environment • Reinforcing or punishing a
• the organism operates response
(manipulates). • in the presence of one
stimulus
• and extinguishing it
• or allowing it to recover
• in the presence of another
stimulus.
23. 12 12
Criteria for diagramming Criteria for diagramming
discriminated contingencies: discriminated contingencies:
same before condition test different before condition test
12 12
Criteria for diagramming Criteria for diagramming
discriminated contingencies discriminated contingencies:
response test operandum test
12 13
Criteria for diagramming Concept:
discriminated contingencies: stimulus generalization
extinction/recovery test write-out/review term
13 13
Concept: Concept:
stimulus class concept training
write-out/review term write-out/review term
24. • Does the SD differ from the • Is the before condition the
before condition? same for both the SD and
the S∆?
• Does the SD differ from the • Is the response the same for
operandum? both the SD and the S∆?
• The behavioral • Is the S∆ contingency always
contingencies extinction or recovery?
• in the presence of one
stimulus
• affect the frequency of the
response
• in the presence of another
stimulus.
• Reinforcing or punishing a • A set of stimuli,
response • all of which have some
• in the presence of one common physical property.
stimulus class
• and extinguishing it
• or allowing it to recover
• in the presence of another
stimulus class.
25. 13 13
Concept: Concept:
matching to sample Subjective measure
write-out/review term
13
13 Concept:
Concept: conceptual stimulus control
Objective measure (conceptual control)
write-out/review term
13 13
Concept: Concept:
stimulus-generalization stimulus dimensions
gradient
13 13
Concept: Concept:
fading procedure errorless
write-out/review term discrimination
procedure
26. • The criteria for • Selecting a comparison
measurement are not stimulus
completely specified in • corresponding to a sample
physical terms stimulus.
• or the event being
measured is a private, inner
experience.
• Responding occurs more • The criteria for
often in the presence of measurement are
one stimulus class completely specified in
• and less often in the physical terms
presence of another • and the event being
stimulus class measured is public and
• because of concept therefore observable by
training. more than one person.
• The physical properties of • A gradient of responding
a stimulus. showing
• a decrease in responding
• as the test stimulus
• becomes less similar to the
training stimulus.
• The use of a fading • At first, the S∆ and the SD
procedure differ along at least two
• to establish a stimulus dimensions.
discrimination, • Then the difference between
• with no errors during the the S∆ and the SD is reduced
training. along all but one dimension,
• until the SD and S∆ differ
along only the relevant
dimension.
27. 14 14
Concept: Concept:
Imitation physical prompt
write-out/review term (physical guidance)
14 14
Concept: Concept:
generalized imitation verbal prompt
write-out/review term
14 14
Concept: Theory:
imitative reinforcers the theory of
write-out/review term generalized imitation
15 15
Concept: Concept:
avoidance contingency avoidance-of-loss contingency
write-out/review term write-out/review term
28. • The form of the behavior of
• The trainer physically moves the imitator
the trainee's body • is controlled by
• in an approximation of the • similar behavior of the
desired response. model.
• A supplemental verbal • Imitation of the response
stimulus • of a model
• that raises the probability of • without previous
a correct response. reinforcement of
• imitation of that specific
response.
• Generalized imitative • Stimuli arising from the
responses occur match between
• because they automatically • the behavior of the imitator
produce imitative reinforcers. • and the behavior of the
model.
• Response-contingent • Response-contingent
• prevention of • prevention of
• loss of a reinforcer • an aversive condition
• resulting in an increased • resulting in an increased
frequency of that response. frequency of that response.
29. 15 16
Concept: Concept:
warning stimulus Differential reinforcement of other
write-out/review term behavior (DRO)
write-out/review term
16 16
Concept: Concept:
punishment-by-prevention- punishment-by-prevention-of-
of-a-reinforcer removal contingency
contingency write-out/review term
17 17
Concept: Concept:
Intermittent Reinforcement fixed-ratio responding
write-out/review term write-out/review term
17 17
Concept: Concept:
continuous reinforcement variable-ratio (VR)
(CRF) schedule of
reinforcement
write-out/review term
30. • A reinforcer is presented • A stimulus that precedes
• after a fixed interval of time • an aversive condition
• if the response of interest and thus becomes a
has not occurred during that learned aversive stimulus.
interval
• Response-contingent • Response-contingent
• prevention of removal of • prevention of
• an aversive condition • a reinforcer
• resulting in a decreased • resulting in a decreased
frequency of that response frequency of that response.
• After a response is A reinforcer follows the
reinforced, response
• no responding occurs for a only once in a while.
period of time,
• then responding occurs at a
high, steady rate
• until the next reinforcer is
delivered.
• A reinforcer follows • A reinforcer follows each
• after a variable number of response.
responses.
31. 17 17
Concept: Concept:
schedule of reinforcement variable-ratio
responding
17 18
Concept: Concept:
fixed-ratio (FR) fixed-interval (FI)
schedule of reinforcement schedule of
write-out/review term reinforcement
write-out/review term
18 18
Concept: Principle:
fixed-interval scallop variable-interval
write-out/review term responding
write-out/review term
18 18
Concept: Concept:
fixed-time schedule resistnce to extinction
of reinforcer delivery write-out/review term
write-out/review term
32. • Variable-ratio schedules • The way reinforcement
produce occurs
• a high rate of responding, • because of the number of
• with almost no responses,
postreinforcement pausing. • time between responses,
and
• stimulus conditions.
• A reinforcer is contingent on • A reinforcer follows
• the first response, • a fixed number of
• after a fixed interval of time, responses.
• since the last opportunity for
reinforcement.
• A fixed-interval schedule
• Variable-interval schedules often produces a scallop:
produce • a gradual increase in the
• a moderate rate of rate of responding,
responding, • with responding occurring at
• with almost no a high rate,
postreinforcement pausing. • just before reinforcement is
available.
• The number of responses or • A reinforcer is delivered,
• the amount of time • after the passage of a fixed
• before a response period of time,
extinguishes. • independently of the
response.
33. 18 18
Concept: Principle:
superstitious behavior resistance to extinction
write-out/review term and intermittent
reinforcement
write-out/review term
18 19
Concept: Concept:
variable-interval (VI) concurrent contingencies
schedule of write-out/review term
reinforcement
write-out/review term
19 19
Concept: Erroneous Principle:
differential reinforcement symptom substitution
of incompatible behavior (DRI)
write-out/review term
19 19
Principle: Concept:
matching law Intervention/treatment
package
34. • Intermittent reinforcement • Behaving as if the response
• makes the response causes
• more resistant to extinction • some specific outcome,
• than does continuous • when it really does not.
reinforcement.
• More than one contingency • A reinforcer is contingent on
of reinforcement or • the first response,
punishment • after a variable interval of
• is available at the same time. time,
• since the last opportunity for
reinforcement.
• Problem behaviors are • Reinforcement is contingent
symptoms of an underlying on a behavior that is
mental illness. • incompatible with another
• So if you get rid of one behavior
problem behavior
(“symptom”),
• another will take its place,
• until you get rid of the
• The addition or change of • When two different
several independent responses are each
variables reinforced with a different
• at the same time schedule of reinforcement,
• to achieve a desired result, • the relative frequency of the
• without testing the effect of two responses
each variable individually. • equals the relative value of
reinforcement on the two
schedules of reinforcement.
35. 20 20
Concept: Concept:
total-task forward chaining
presentation
20 20
Principle: Concept:
dual-functioning behavioral
chained stimuli chain
write-out/review term write-out/review term
20 20
Concept: Concept:
backward chaining differential reinforcement
write-out/review term of low rate (DRL)
write-out/review term
21 21
Concept: Concept:
unconditioned response conditioned stimulus
(UR) (CS)
write-out/review term write-out/review term
36. • The establishment of the • The simultaneous training of
first link in a behavioral • all links in a behavioral
chain, chain.
• with the addition of
successive links,
• until the final link is acquired
• A sequence of stimuli and • A stimulus in a behavioral
responses. chain
• Each response produces a • reinforces the response that
stimulus that precedes it
• reinforces the preceding • and is an SD or operandum
response for the following response.
• and is an SD or operandum
• for the following response.
• Reinforcement • The establishment of the
• for each response following final link in a behavioral
the preceding response chain,
• by at least some minimum • with the addition of
delay. preceding links,
• until the first link is acquired.
• A stimulus that has acquired • An unlearned response
its eliciting properties • elicited by the presentation
• through previous pairing with • of an unconditioned stimulus
another stimulus.
37. 21 21
Concept: Concept:
unconditioned stimulus conditioned response
(US) (CR)
write-out/review term write-out/review term
21 21
Concept: Concept:
operant conditioning respondent conditioning
write-out/review term write-out/review term
21 21
Concept: General Rule:
higher-order conditioning SD / CS test
write-out/review term
21 21
Concept: Concept:
respondent extinction systematic desensitization
write-out/review term write-out/review term
38. • A learned response • A stimulus that produces the
• elicited by the presentation unconditioned response
• of a conditioned stimulus. • without previous pairing with
another stimulus.
• A neutral stimulus • Reinforcing consequences
• acquires the eliciting • following the response
properties • increase its future
• of an unconditioned stimulus frequency; and
• through pairing the • aversive consequences
unconditioned stimulus • following the response
• with a neutral stimulus. • decrease its future
frequency.
• To determine if a stimulus is • Establishing a conditioned
an SD or CS, stimulus
• look at its history of • by pairing a neutral stimulus
conditioning: • with an already established
• look for a plausible US -- UR conditioned stimulus.
relation;
• and alternatively, look for a
plausible SD -- R -- SR
contingency.
• Combining relaxation with • Present the conditioned
• a hierarchy of fear-producing stimulus
stimuli, • without pairing it
• arranged from the least to • with the unconditioned
the most frightening. stimulus,
• or with an already
established conditioned
stimulus,
39. 22 22
Concept: Concept:
direct-acting rule
contingency write-out/review term
22 22
Concept: Concept:
rule-governed analog to rule control
a behavioral contingency
write-out/review term
22 22
Concept: Concept:
ineffective contingency rule-governed behavior
write-out/review term
22 22
Concept: Concept:
contingency control indirect-acting
write-out/review term contingency
write-out/review term
40. • A description of a • A contingency in which
behavioral contingency. • the outcome of the
response
• reinforces or punishes that
response.
• The statement of a rule • A change in the frequency
• controls the response of a response
• described by that rule. • because of a rule
describing the contingency.
• Behavior under the control • A contingency that does not
of a rule. control behavior.
• A contingency that controls • Direct control of behavior
the response, • by a contingency,
• though the outcome of that • without the involvement of
response rules.
• does not reinforce or punish
that response.
41. 22 22
Principle: Concept:
(Optional-not on quiz) (Optional-not on quiz)
Immediate reinforcement a contingency that is
not direct acting
22 23
(Optional-not on quiz) General Concept:
Rule: feedback
rule control write-out/review term
23 23
Concept: Review Concept:
process vs. product Covert behavior
write-out/review term
23 23
Concept Review: Principle:
task analysis shifting from rule-control
write-out/review term to contingency control
42. • Either an indirect-acting • The effect of the
contingency or reinforcement procedure
• an ineffective contingency. decreases
• as the delay between the
response and the outcome
increases.
• Reinforcers delayed more
than 60 seconds
• Nonverbal stimuli • Start looking for rule
• or verbal statements control,
• contingent on past behavior • if behavior is controlled by
• that can guide future an outcome
behavior. • that follows the response by
more than 60 seconds.
• Private behavior (not visible • Sometimes you need to
to the outside observer). make reinforcers and
feedback
• contingent on the
component responses of
the process,
• not just the product
(outcome).
• With repetition of the • An analysis of complex
response, behavior
• control often shifts from • and sequences of behavior
control by the rule • into their component
describing a direct-acting responses.
contingency
• to control by the direct-
acting contingency itself.
43. 23 24
Concept: Concept:
multiple baseline performance contract
design (behavioral contract or
contingency contract)
24 24
False Principle: Principle:
the mythical cause of rules that are easy to follow
poor self-management write-out/review term
24 24
Model: Principle:
the three-contingency model the real cause of
of performance-management poor self-management
write-out/review term
24 25
Principle: Principle:
rules that are hard to follow the deadline principle
write-out/review term
44. • A written rule statement • An experimental design
describing • in which the replications
• the desired or undesired involve baselines
behavior, • of differing durations and
• the occasion when the • interventions of differing
behavior should or should starting times.
not occur, and
• the added outcome for that
• Describe outcomes that are • Poor self-management
• both sizable occurs
• and probable. • because immediate
• The delay isn't crucial. outcomes control our
behavior
• better than delayed
outcomes do.
• Poor self-management • The three crucial
results from contingencies are:
• poor control by rules • the ineffective natural
describing contingency,
• outcomes that are either • the effective, indirect-acting
• too small (though often of performance-management
cumulative significance) contingency, and
• or too improbable. • the effective, direct-acting
• If an indirect-acting • Describe outcomes that are
contingency either
• is to increase or maintain • too small (though often of
performance, cumulative significance)
• it should involve a deadline. • or too improbable.
• The delay isn't crucial.
45. 25 25
Concept: General Rule:
pay for performance The it-is-probably-rule-control rule
write-out/review term
25 26
Principle: Concept:
the analog to avoidance spiritualistic mentalism
principle
26 26
Concept: Concept:
the simplistic biological- the simplistic cognitivist error
determinist error
26 26
Concept: Concept:
the simplistic behaviorist error methodological behaviorism
write-out/review term
46. • It is probably rule control, • Pay is contingent on specific
if achievements
• the person knows the rule,
• the outcome is delayed, or
• the performance changes
as soon as the person
hears the rule.
• The doctrine that the mind • If an indirect-acting
is contingency
• spiritual (nonphysical). • is to increase or maintain
performance,
• it should be an analog to
avoidance.
• Rats think • Analogous behaviors are
• homologous behaviors.
• An approach that restricts • People don’t think.
the science of psychology
to
• only those independent
and dependent variables
• that two independent
people can directly
observe.
48. • An entity or collection of • The doctrine that the mind
entities causes behavior to occur.
• assumed to cause behavior
to occur.
• It may be either material or
nonmaterial,
• but it is not the behavior
itself.
• The doctrine that the world is • The doctrine that physical
divided into two parts, (material) world
• material and spiritual. • is the only reality.
• An entity • An approach that
• assumed to cause action; addresses all psychology
• the way the organism sees • in terms of the principles of
the world, behavior.
• including the organism's
beliefs and expectations.
• It is material, but not
behavior.
• The doctrine that the mind is • An approach that attempts
• physical, not spiritual. to modify behavior
• by modifying the cognitive
structure.
49. 26 26
Concept: Concept:
Values goal-directed systems
design
26 26
Concept: Concept:
legal rule control moral (ethical)
rule control
27 27
Concept: Principle:
performance maintenance behavior trap
write-out/review term write-out/review term
28 29
Concept: Review Principle:
transfer of training the law of effect
write-out/review term
50. • First you select the ultimate • Learned and unlearned
goal of a system, reinforcers
• then you select the various • and aversive conditions.
levels of intermediate goals
needed to accomplish that
ultimate goal,
• and finally, you select the
initial goals needed to
• Control by rules specifying • Control by rules specifying
added analogs to added analogs to behavioral
behavioral contingencies. contingencies
• Such rules specify social, • and added direct-acting
religious, or supernatural behavioral contingencies
outcomes. • based on material
outcomes.
• Add a reinforcement • The continuing of
contingency performance
• to increase the rate of • after it was first established
behavior.
• Then the behavior will
frequently contact
• built-in reinforcement
contingencies,
• The effects of our actions • Performance established
• determine whether we will • at one time
repeat them. • in one place
• now occurs in a different
time and place.
52. • The extent to which the • Experts’ evaluation
conclusions of an experiment • of the significance of
• apply to a wide variety of • the target behavior and the
conditions. outcome.
• The time from • Measuring performance
• the beginning • when the clients or subjects
• to the end are aware
• of a response. • of the ongoing observation.
• Intensity of a response. • Measuring performance
• when the clients or subjects
• are not aware
• of the ongoing observation.
• Agreement between • Record or evidence
• observations of • that the behavior has
• two or more independent occurred.
observers.
54. • The phase of an • Two or more possible
experiment or intervention independent variables have
• in which the behavior is changed at the same time,
measured • so it is not possible to
• in the absence of an determine which of those
intervention. variables caused the
change in the dependent
variable.
• An experimental design • The evaluation of the results
• in which the baseline data of
are collected • an applied intervention or
• before the intervention. • a naturally changing
condition
• that involves confounded
variables.
• An experimental design • The extent to which a
• in which the intervention research design
(experimental) and baseline • eliminates confounding
conditions variables.
• are reversed
• to determine if the
dependent variable
changes as
• An experimental design • The arrangement of the
• in which the replications various conditions of an
involve experiment or intervention
• baselines of differing • to reduce the confounding of
durations independent variables.
• and interventions of
differing starting times.
56. • An analysis • An experimental design
• of the contingencies • in which the replications
responsible for involve
• behavioral problems. • interventions with criteria of
differing values.
• The goals, • An experimental design
• procedures, • in which the replications
• and results of an involve
intervention • presenting the different
• are socially acceptable to values of the independent
the variable
• client, • in an alternating sequence
• the behavior analyst, • under the same general
• The behavior being • One experimental condition
measured, • affects the results of
• the dependent variable. another.
• A comparison of the
performance of clients
• exposed to the intervention
• with an equivalent or
"normal" group.