This document provides a validation form for evaluators to assess the validity of Self-Instructional Materials (SIMs). The form contains sections to evaluate the Format and Design, Language and Style, Content, and Usability of the SIMs. The evaluator is asked to check boxes indicating whether each listed item meets standards of clarity, suitability, understandability, and ability to serve learners. They are also prompted to provide remarks on any items as needed. The validation process examines elements like readability, organization, language level, instruction clarity, activity design, assessment design, and ease of use of the SIMs.

1. VALIDATION FORM FOR THE
SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS (SIMs)
Name of Evaluator: ______________________________________Date: __________________
Position: ________________________________No. of Years in DepEd: __________________
To the Evaluator:
Using this assessment form, kindly determine the validity of Self-Instructional Materials
(SIMs) through examining the sections namely: Format and Design, Language and Style, Content, and
Usability. The items must be evaluated in terms of their clarity, suitability, understandability, and ability
to serve its purpose for the learners. Please check (/) the corresponding box and write the necessary
remarks.
SECTIONS ITEMS EVALUATION
YES NO REMARKS
FORMAT AND
DESIGN
1. The appearance is clear and readable
2. The fonts used are comprehensive and appropriate
3. Displays major parts with page numbers
4. The spacing on the pages contributes to the ease of reading
and responding.
5. The layout is attractive and uniform
6. The topic overview gives enough detail to get the main idea
across
7. Presents the objectives and overview of the activities
8. Activities are logically sequenced.
9. Sections are uniform in every activity
LANGUAGE
AND STYLE
10. Appropriate to the level of the learners
11. Simple and easy to understand
12. Instructions are stated clearly
13. Define terms appropriately
14. Consistent free from grammatical errors
15. Properly constructed and punctuated
16. Questions are clear and understandable.
CONTENT
TITLE CARD/SHEET
17. Indicate the title, objectives, codes, and number of days.
18. Attractive and appealing to the eye of the learners
19. The title was enticing to the pupils to use it
20. Significantly follow the competencies of the K to 12
Curriculum
GUIDE CARD/SHEET
21. Attracts the reader significantly
22. Words used were simple and easily be understood
23. Instructions are systemically sequenced.
24. The discussions give the most important basic information
regarding the topic.
25. Least learned competency and skills are clearly stated
ACTIVITY CARD/SHEET
26. Activities were appropriately designed to the level of the
students.
27. Provide instructions that are logically sequenced.
28. Activities were parallel to the learned competency and tasks
29. The illustrations and diagrams support the topic of discussion
per activity
30. Activities were designed to measure to its truest objectives

2. 31. Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
learners.
ASSESSMENT CARD/SHEET
32. Assessment was appropriately designed to the level of the
learners
33. Assessment was parallel to the learned competency and tasks
34. The assessment was designed to measure to its truest
objectives
35. Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
learners.
ENRICHMENT CARD/SHEET
36. Enrichments were appropriately designed to the level of the
learners
37. Enrichment was parallel to the learned competency and tasks
38. The questions support further learning of the learners
39. Enrichment was designed to measure to its truest objectives
40. Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
learners.
REFERENCE CARD/SHEET
41. Indicates the name of author, title, website/URL and page
number
42. Reference was shown in alphabetical order.
USABILITY OF
MATERIALS
43. Identifies all materials used in the activities
44. Provides concise step-by-step instructions or procedure.
45. Easy to use/manipulate and set-up
46. Module is congruent with the expected output
47. Attractive and Durable
48. User Friendly
Comments/Corrections/Suggestions:
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________.
_________________________________
Evaluator’s Name and Signature