Download to read offline
Uploaded byThomas Vander Wal
Using Lenses to Right Fit Social & Collaboration
The document discusses using the right tools for social collaboration based on needs and scale. It advocates understanding collaboration through "lenses" like personal, collective, teams to fit the right social progression from sparks to campfires to larger groups. Closed and open sharing models are compared. Ensuring strong skills on the team, planning for problems, integrating multiple pieces, and regularly reviewing tools are advised for effective social platforms.
More Related Content
Similar to Using Lenses to Right Fit Social & Collaboration
Using Lenses to Right Fit Social & Collaboration
- 1. Thomas Vander Wal 16November 2016 KM World - Washington, DC Using Lenses to Right Fit Social & Collaboration
- 2.
- 3. Designing, developing, and/ or managing social platforms since 1996 Model of Attraction (2002) Come to Me Web (2004) Folksonomy (2004) 60+ Social Lenses (2008) Connected Company (2010)
- 4. Too often collaboration& social start with a tool or service first
- 5. Today that istaking it backwards or upside down
- 6. Find which sideis up, your needs, what the tool does, and how it may be used
- 7. In short, itis learning to see
- 8. And learn theshape of things
- 9. Breaking Down Internal Social/ Collaboration
- 10. Common connected workingspace Knowledge sharing Working out loud
- 11. Knowledge and WorkFlows
- 12. Email: Where knowledge goesto die Knowledge R. I. P.
- 13. Closed Nodes • Topdown • Approval-centric • Slow to spread • Slow to change • Knowledge buried • Training focussed • Email • Document repository • White papers • Policy documents
- 14. Open Nodes • Emergent •Sharing-centric • Nimble and adaptive • Constantly changing • Knowledge searchable and linked • Helping focussed • Open digital conversation • Collaborative and collective living documents • All history and transitions viewable and available • Conversations around objects link to object with objects often in clear sight
- 15. In the longrun, what went into making the decision has more value than the decision.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22. Organizations with 1social platform have a high probability of having 2 or more
- 23. One size fitsall works for… No One
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27. Team / Group/ Community / Network Cooperative
- 28.
- 29. Collective Cooperative Team /Group / Community / Network Collaborative Social Working Array Communication Layer
- 30. Social Scaling • Humansare mostly social by nature. But, often not social at scale. • Most people are most comfortable interacting with a small group of others they know and comfort decreases as group size grows • Humans naturally build groups and clusters to ease interacting with large groups • Understand what social types fit best at what scale
- 31. 31 Right Fitting DigitalWork Activities to Appropriate Scale Network Community Group Team / Small Group Collective Cooperative: Team Cooperative: Group Cooperative: Community Cooperative: Network Collaborative IncreaseScale Types of Digital Work Activities
- 32. Team Needs Tasks Team Fit Process & Planning Progress Status Calendar Comms Shared Resources Decisions
- 33. Walled Gardens vs.Open Sharing
- 34. Closed groups asdefault
- 35. Lack of comfortwith open sharing
- 36.
- 37. Donald Appleyard’s “LivableStreets”
- 38. It is essentialto get the foundation right
- 39. Solid Skills onthe Team Community Manager Social Interaction Designer Social Scientists Knowledge Manager UX / User Research IT Dev / Integrator Change Manager
- 40. There will beproblems?
- 41. Services Go Away RedundancyFailover Constant change is the norm
- 42.
- 43. Many Pieces inOne System Integration / Interoperation Umbrella Service Need Community / Collaboration Manager
- 44. Tool Selection andReview 6 Month Tool Reviews Stability & Long Term Assessments Vendor Assessments
- 45. High Level Mapfor Tool Selection and Review
- 47.
- 48. URL: www.vanderwal.net Blog: www.personalinfocloud.com E-mail:thomas@vanderwal.net Skype: tjvanderwal Twitter: @infocloud