ARE BRAND PARODIES HARMFUL FOR THE BRAND RELATIONSHIP?
•Download as PPT, PDF•
2 likes•615 views
Presentation given at the 2nd International Consumer Brand Relationships Conference, www.consumer-brand-relationships.org Copyright by Géraldine Michel Ouidade Sabri France Pierre-Yves Lagroue
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to ARE BRAND PARODIES HARMFUL FOR THE BRAND RELATIONSHIP?
Similar to ARE BRAND PARODIES HARMFUL FOR THE BRAND RELATIONSHIP? (20)
More from CBR Conference
More from CBR Conference (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
ARE BRAND PARODIES HARMFUL FOR THE BRAND RELATIONSHIP?
- 1. ARE BRAND PARODIES HARMFUL FOR THE BRAND RELATIONSHIP? Géraldine Michel Professor – Sorbonne Business School– France Ouidade Sabri Associate Professor - Sorbonne Business School– France Pierre-Yves Lagroue Associate Professor , Sorbonne Business School– France Consumer Brand Relationship Colloquium – March 2011
- 2. 2 1. Why is it so important to study parody effects? Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 3. Parody : phenomen increasing Parody is a creative art that transforms a serious copyrighted work by using irony, humor or satire (Bush, Bush & Boller, 1994; Johnson 1 Spilger 2000) Brand parodies can be either positive or negative Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 4. … At the same time Maintaining or creating a good reputation for companies is a main challenge and in all sectors. So the analysis of negative parody effects is especially important. What changes in the brand perception ? What changes in the brand relationship ? Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 5. Little previous research Little literature about parody Little conceptualization to analyze parody effects (Johnson and Spilger 2000; Bush, Bush, and Boller, 1994; Zinkhan,1994). Few empirical results (Jean 2011; Ahluwalia, Burnkrant and Unhava, 2000). Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 6. 6 2. What are the research objectives ? Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 7. Research purposes Analyse the impact of negative brand parody on brand Analyse ad attention and brand recall Impact on brand relationship Impact on word-of-mouth Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 8. The hypothesis of negative brand parody impact on brand Brand commitment Behavior toward Brand Logo attitude Attention Brand Recall Brand relationship Brand Affect Brand trust Brand word-of-mouth Brand Reputation H1 + H2 = H4 + H3c - H3b - H3a - H5 - Negative logo parody versus real logo Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 9. 9 3. Which methodology did we use ? Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 10. EXPERIMENT METHODOLOGY Specific focus on negative parody of 2 brands : Evian (bottled mineral water) and Fnac (Cultural and technological product retailer) 4 groups (experimental and control groups * 2 brands) Online questionnaire, exposure to the logo on blog page Sample 172 respondents 53% men Age average : 31 years old Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 11. Experimental groups / Control groups Sink, natural tap water Money, profit maker Evian, natural spring water Fnac, idea shaker Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 12. 12 4. What are the survey results ? Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 13. Do you recognize what you see ? In the experimental group 31% saw « evian » even though we showed « evier » logo. In the experimental group 48% saw « fnac.com » even though we showed « fric.com » logo. EVIAN FNAC Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011 Gestalt theory
- 14. ANOVA to compare experimental and control group Real logo Parodie d logo F P Attention 3.36 3.73 3.25 .06 % Recall .83 .69 .10 Brand trust 3.80 3.76 .089 .76 Brand reputation 3.97 3.91 1.79 .67 Brand Affect 3.87 3.93 .153 .69 Word-of- Mouth 3.48 3.27 1.38 .22 Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 15. ANCOVA to test the commitment moderating role Commitment * cas F P Brand trust 1.05 .40 Brand reputation .95 .47 Brand Affect 1.48 .18 Word-of- Mouth .77 .61 Brand commitment doesn’t moderate the logo parody effects Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 16. ANOVA to compare the logo characteristic Real logo Parodie d Logo F P Credibility 3.18 2.90 3.50 .00 Humor 2.39 3.65 44.58 .00 Parodied logo is perceived as less credible and more humorous than real logo Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 17. 17 5. Conclusion Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 18. Conclusion Theoretical contributions No effect of negative logo parody on brand relationship Reasons why The parody claims are perceived to be less credible than real brand claims but the credible content is important in convincing. The brand awareness dismisses the impact of negative claims, now in this research Evian and Fnac Brands have a high awareness.Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 19. Conclusion Managerial contributions Negative logo parody has no impact to the original brand if not founded on specific issues(s) related to the brand Logo parody could increase the brand visiblity even the parody could be perceived negative (ex: Logorama) Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 20. Limitations and further research Survey on negative parody advertising (brand parody more explicite) Survey on past or present brand issues (brand which showed some issues on the past) Before and after brand parody exposure (with control group) Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 21. Thank you
- 22. Global results Behavior towards Brand Cognitive impact Attention Brand Recall Brand relationship Brand Affect Brand trust Brand word-of-mouth Brand Reputation H1 + H2 = H4 H3c H3b H3a Negative logo parody / real brand logo Brand commitment H5 Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
- 23. Outline 1. Why is it so important to study parody effects ? 2. What are the research objectives ? 3. Which methodology did we use ? 4. What are the study results ? Michel, Sabri, Lagroue CBR 2011
Editor's Notes
- The parody source could be a logo, an advertising, or a joke in the movie. For instance in Shrek 2 movie, Starbuck brand was called Farbucks and the luxury brand Versace was called Versarcherry. Shreck 2: Versarchery, Armani Armour, Burger Prince, Abercombie & Witch, Saxxon Fifth Avenue, Tower of London Records, Farbucks... Tabasco effects on your estomac OMFG « O my funk god », scam= arnaque
- When the consumer saw a brand parody what are the changes in the brand perception, what are the changes in the brand relationship?
- Impact on the attention toward brand Impact on the brand recall Impact on the WOM about brand
- À présenter sur la base d’un exemple
- We studied 2 brands We showed 2 logos to 2 different groups. Experimental group was exposed to the parodied logo and the control group was exposed to the real logo
- Problem / issues Importance of humorous content in recalling the claim
- Some brands asked to the author why the brand logo was not in the movie. Some brands were disappoint to not see their own logo in the logorama movie. Because the parody means that the brand is strong, is a signal of brand power. The Logorama movie is a short animation by H5. It won at the 2010 Oscars in the short film category. Full movie below. In a world made up entirely of trademarks and brand names, Michelin Man cops pursue a criminal Ronald McDonald.
- The results confirm only 2 hypothesis. The consumer has higher attention towards evier than evian The consumer makes the link between the logo and evian brand with no significant difference between the experimental and control group
- The presentation is orgasined in 4 parts