Urban Hub 19 : Deep Drivers - An Integral Theory of Change and a framework for action - Thriveable Cities

Urban Hub
Integral UrbanHub
Thriveable Cities
Paul van Schaik
integralMENTORS
Deep Drivers
a meta pragmatic approach
AnIntegralTheoryofChange
andaframeworkforaction
19

Urban Hub
Drivers: An Integral Theory of Change
Thriveable Cities
integralMENTORS
Paul van Schaik
Creator & Curator
Integral UrbanHub
19

Copyright ©©integralMENTORS – January 2020
ISBN: 978-1676174318
In fullness and freedom
A series of graphics from integralMENTORS integral UrbanHub work on Thriveable Cities presentations.

Content
Introduction
Deep Drivers
Communication
Evaluation & monitoring
Annex
Books

People do not perceive worlds but enact them. Different mindsets bring forth different worlds.
Thriveable Cities
An Integral View
Art
Climate
Community
Connectivity
Complexity
Creativity
Cultures
Density
Ecology
Education
Energy
Entertainment
Exercise
Faith
Farming
Food
Governance
Healing
Health
Innovative
Leisure
Mobility
Music
Participation
People-centred
Psychology
Re-cycling
Re-use
Regions
Spirituality
Sustainability
Systems
Technology
Transport
Water
Wellbeing
Wealth
Work
A thriveable city will integrate
most of these & more
Congestion
Desolation
Disease
Dirty
Disparity
Distance
Few resources
Ghettos
Gross inequality
Homelessness
No community
Loneness
Poor mental Health
Noise
Overcrowding
Pollution
Poor mobility
Poverty
Some signs of non-thriveable
cities
Soulless
Slums
Sprawl
Stress
Ugliness
Unemployment
Violence
…….
…….
Beautiful
Carbon neutral
Circular
Creative
Compact
Complex
Cultural
Diverse
Eco
Equitable
Economic
Ethical
Fair
Garden-city
Good-city
Green-city
Happy-city
A thriveable city will be most of
these & more
Healthy
Historic-city
Innovative
Inclusive
Integral-city
Just
Learning-city
Living-city
Resilient
Polycentric
Sacred-city
Science-city
Smart-city
Sustainable-city
……
........
People-Centred & (a)

Before modern man can gain control over the
forces that now threaten his very existence, he must
resume possession of himself.
This sets the chief mission for the city of the future:
that of creating a visible regional and civic
structure, designed to make man at home with his
deeper self and his larger world, attached to
images of human nature and love.
Lewis Mumford, writer

Introduction
What is this book
Integral theory is genuinely post-postmodern
or trans-modern, vastly inclusive yet
disciplined, so combining richness with rigour,
breadth with depth, and giving equal value to
the subjective and objective while also
grounded in empirical evidence. It guides
studies in various fields, providing a
conceptual framework that stimulates new
insights by highlighting neglected areas of
investigation and unexplored relationships.
Integral Theory provides a framework for
understanding the evolving complexification
of values, worldviews, behaviour, culture and
systems. That is; subjective and objective
worlds as well as intersubjective and
interobjective worlds.
Simplistically put:
Consciousness and Cultures of interior
subjective worlds and Capacities and
Creations of exterior objective worlds. All
based on ‘scientific’ studies appropriate to
each domain.
www.integralmentors.org

Introduction
Walking in the world not talking of the world
No one vision is sufficient in and of itself – visions
can guide but only by collaborative action in a
creative generative process can visions grow and
become part of an ongoing positive sociocultural
reality.
Without taking into account the many worldviews
that currently co-exist and crafting ways of
including them in a positive and healthy form we
will continue to alienate vast sections of all
communities and humankind.
It is through the growing healthy versions of all the
different worldviews that we can attempt to move
towards an equitable, regenerative and caring
world living within the planetary boundaries.
Through action we will move forward – through
only ongoing talk we will stagnate and fail.
These curation are to be dipped into – explored
and used to generate ideas and discussion.
A catalyst for collaboration and action.
And most importantly grown, modified in a
generative form.
This is a living document - any suggestions for inclusion
in the next volume send to: info@integralmentors.org
How to use this book
A taste of many visions in our world.
Visions both positive - utopian, and negative - dystopian. Each
claiming to be true and enfolding all the others
But in reality, they are ‘true’ but partial – and some more ‘true’
than others. Each ‘shallower’ truth transcended but the best is
included in the next ‘deeper’ or broader truth. However also
creating new and more complex problems.
It’s how we use them together and in collaboration that will
define how successful we are. It is the morphogenetic pull of
caring that will determine how we succeed as a human race. It is
the ability to generate an equitable, fair, resilient and
regenerative ‘system’ that must drive us forward.
The means will be a combination of many of the ideas
showcased here but many more still to be discovered on our
exciting journey into the future. Held together through a
syngeneic Integral Mythological Pluralism
Too little courage and we will fail – too much certainty and we will fail.
But with care and collaboration we have a chance of success.
Bringing forth emergent impact through innovation, syngeneic
enfoldment & collaborative effort.
And a deeper understanding of a broader framework will be required
– that is, a more integral vision.
Explore and enjoy – use as many of the ideas as possible, enfolding
each into an emergent whole that grows generatively.
At each step testing – reformulating – regrouping – recreating.
Moving beyond, participating, thro’ stake-holding, thro’ share-
holding, to becoming a thrive-holder.

© integralMENTORS
• multiple brain states and organic factors.
Subjects do not perceive worlds but enact them. Different states of subjects bring forth different worlds.
A more integral cartography might
include:
• multiple waves of existence, spanning the
entire spectrum of consciousness,
subconscious to self-conscious to super-
conscious.
• numerous different streams, modules, or
lines of development, including cognitive,
moral, spiritual, aesthetic, somatic,
imaginative, interpersonal, etc.
• numerous different types of consciousness,
including gender types, personality types
(enneagram, Myers-Briggs, Jungian), and so
on.
• multiple states of consciousness,
including waking, dreaming, sleeping,
altered, non-ordinary, and meditative.
What can be said about a more integral model of human possibilities? Before talking about the
application of an integral vision — in education, politics, business, health care, and so on — there
needs to be some general notion of what it is that is to be applied in the first place. Moving
from pluralistic relativism to universal integralism, what kind of map might be found?
An Integral View

An Integral View
• Social system
the massively influential forces of the social system, at all levels (from
nature to human structures, including the all-important impact of
nonhuman social systems, from Gaia to ecosystems).
A more integral cartography might also include:
• Cultural factors
the extraordinarily important impact of numerous cultural factors,
including the rich textures of diverse cultural realities, background
contexts, pluralistic perceptions, linguistic semantics, and so on, none
of which should be unwarrantedly marginalized, all of which should
be included and integrated in a broad web of integral-aperspectival
tapestries (and, just as important, a truly "integral transformative
practice" would give considerable weight to the importance of
relationships, community, culture, and intersubjective factors in
general, not as merely a realm of application of spiritual insight, but as
a mode of spiritual transformation).
• the importance of the self as the navigator of the great River of Life
should not be overlooked. It appears that the self is not a monolithic
entity but rather a society of selves with a centre of gravity, which acts
to bind the multiple waves, states, streams, and realms into something
of a unified organization; the disruption of this organization, at any of
its general stages, can result in pathology.
Such are a few of the multiple factors that a richly holistic view of the
Kosmos might wish to include. At the very least, any model that does
not coherently include all of those items is not a very integral model.
Ken Wilber

An Integral View
….. meaning that a subject might be at a
particular wave of consciousness, in a
particular stream of consciousness, in a
particular state of consciousness, in one
quadrant or another.
That means that the phenomena brought
forth by various types of human inquiry
will be different depending on the
quadrants, levels, lines, states, and types
of the subjects bringing forth the
phenomena.
A subject at one wave of consciousness
will not enact and bring forth the same
worldspace as a subject at another wave;
and similarly with quadrants, streams,
states, and types (as we will see in more
detail).
Subjects do not perceive worlds but enact them. Different states
of subjects bring forth different worlds.

AQAL Drivers
An Integral View
The point is simply that, in principle, cross-paradigmatic judgments are possible because
there is not simply one world against which paradigms compete for dominance, a kind of
king-of-the-hill battle that tosses all losers on the garbage dump, because there are no losers.
There is not one world over which all paradigms are fighting for supremacy, but many worlds
brought forth by different paradigms, worlds that can be eye-witnessed by the same subjects
if they submit to the discipline of the paradigms required to enact those worlds. And while
"the" world cannot contain many worlds, awareness can. And because we already know that
there are in fact many worlds, it follows that we already are standing in an awareness that has
cross-paradigmatic capacity, a capacity that can eventuate in metatheoretical overview, such
as the one offered by AQAL.
In short, for AQAL meta-theory, the basic levels of consciousness are a measure of the
"amount" of awareness or consciousness in any line, but consciousness itself is nothing; it is
not a presence but an absence, an opening, a clearing, a space of perspectives, within which
phenomena arise.
You can't have more or less of consciousness, but you can have more or less phenomena
allowed to arise in consciousness. When the entire Kosmos arises in your consciousness, that
is Kosmic consciousness—the top of the mountain, so to speak (except there is no top, only an
infinitely receding horizon that nonetheless gets bigger and bigger the more that you can
love).

AQAL Practitioners (psycho-dynamic)
An Integral View
"The one thing that you will have changed if you adopt an integral approach is
your own awareness, your own consciousness, your own map of human
possibilities, a map that has dramatically expanded from organic interventions to
caring for a human being in all of his or her extraordinary richness across an
entire spectrum that runs from dust to deity, dirt to divinity, even here and now."
"..... the crucial ingredient in any integral practice is not the integral tools
themselves—with all the conventional and unconventional methods—but the user
of those tools, the integrally informed practitioner, who have opened themselves
to an entire spectrum of consciousness—matter to body to mind to soul to spirit—
and who have thereby acknowledged what seems to be happening in any event:
body and mind and spirit are operating in self and culture and nature, and thus
health and healing, sickness and wholeness, are all bound up in a
multidimensional tapestry that cannot be cut into without fatal haemorrhaging."
Ken Wilber

Transformative and Translative communication
There are two meta-types of communication that can occur through any medium (dialogue, media, etc.):
- transformative communications, and
- translative communications
Transformative communication attempts to fundamentally change the way someone sees the world—so as
to foster sustainable behaviour. Many sustainability communications are transformative; they try to get people
to see things differently (such as the interconnectedness of nature and humanity) so that they choose different
actions.
Translative communication does the opposite. Striving to connect with people just as they are, motivating
and informing them in a way that is in alignment with how they already see the world. Translative
communication resonates with a person’s existing worldview, without requiring them to be a different person
in order to take action.
On the whole people rarely make major changes in how they see the world, it’s hard to trigger that change,
and the workings of that change process largely remain a mystery. As such, sustainability communications that
only focus on changing someone’s worldview has less chance of success. To reach people, and to honour
them, most sustainability communication should not encourage others to see the world anew, but rather align
the core messages with their existing worldview(s).
Translative communications for sustainability are developmentally-appropriate: they resonate with the
stage(s) of consciousness—and the correlative worldview(s)—of an audience. The more tailored sustainability
communication is to these different worldviews, the greater the chances of the communication actually ‘taking
hold’, so that it fosters sustainable behaviour.
Second Tier Program Interventions

Ambiguous
You can easily find convincing but totally contradictory information
for any assertion. Because of complexity and unpredictability the
ubiquitous availability of information has created a mist in which it
becomes increasingly difficult to find clarity.
A
V
Volatile
Things change continuously. What is true today isn’t true tomorrow.
Even the nature and dynamics of change change.
U
Uncertain
More than ever, we live with a lack of predictability and a prospect
for surprise. It is impossible to predict how projects will evolve..
C
Complex
Simple cause-and-effect chains have been replaced by complex
interconnected forces and events. Interconnectedness makes all
things increasingly complex.
An Integral View

all actions will have
unintended consequences
Thus
An Integral View

No longer are cities defined by a single slowly evolving Worldview as
they have tended to be up until the failure of both modern and
postmodern Worldviews, to provide fair, equitable and resilient cities for
all.
Current trends in sustainable or smart cities have proven insufficient to
encompass and include the degree of complex thinking needed. A
complexity that defies individual or expert group planning.
A complexity that needs to involve us all in the development of self-
organising evolving cities which allow us to define who we are and what
we want from our co-created urban environment.
A city capable of holding various different cultures and Worldviews that
can be technically resilient and can be socially relevant and culturally
inclusive for all its citizens.
These workshops are part of the evolving process that defines the
actions we all need to be involved in if our cities are to be places we love
to be a part of.

Integral compared with Integrated
Integrated
Balance, equilibrium and harmony -
minimise tension and reduce chaos
Strives for:
• certainty
• order
• sureness
Places a lot of emphasis on harmony
within systems
Integrated strives for uniformity of
similar things
Leads to a constrained sense of reality
Integral (AQAL)
Emergent and healthy tension that holds
things together as they evolve
These tensions provide order in the chaos
Respects:
• uncertainty
• disorder
• insecurity
Respects creative, dynamic and evolving
nature of human and natural processes
Integral strives for a sense of unity in
differences (emphasises unity as much as
diversity)
Leads to a fuller sense of reality
An Integral View

Integral Theory : AQAL Theory of Change
QUADRANTS
The four
principal
territories a
person must
navigate
successfully
STAGES
LEVELS
The stages of
transformational
development for
people, cultures,
systems
LINES
The many
human
intelligences,
cultural
dimensions,
and subsystems
in action
STATES
The peak
expressions of
people and
systems related
to business and
life
TYPES
The many faces of
individuals,
cultures,
organisations,
and systems
Areas not explicitly included
#Zones
The 8 zones:
inside and
outside of
each
quadrant
(deep and
surface
structure}
Areas included in the book

Perspectives – Tetra-meshed Transformation by Quadrants or Domains
Upper Left Quadrant (ULQ)
Individual Interior
Transformation = New Mode of Self
Who am I
Where am I
What am I
Why am I here
Lower Left Quadrant (LLQ)
Collective Interior
Transformation = New Culture and
new View of the World
Who are We
Where are We
What are We
Why are We here
Upper Right Quadrant (URQ)
Individual Exterior
Transformation = New Behaviours
How am I to be here with others
Lower Right Quadrant (LRQ)
Collective Exterior
Transformation = New Social Institutions
and Techno-Economic Base
How are we to be here with others
domains
tetra-
meshed

Behaviour
Functional fit
Social Systems
Intensions
Values/Mindsets
Culture
Behavioural manifestation
Systems manifestation
Values/Mindsets
deep drivers
Cultural deep drivers
All quad.- or Tetra-meshed
Deep drivers and manifestations quad-meshing : AQAL Iceberg model

m
eta-m
odern
Integralcom
m
ons
G
lobalcom
m
unity
Inform
ational
Kosm
ic
Centric
Integral
Pluralistic
Value
com
m
unities
Late
industrial/
Early
inform
ational
W
orld
Centric
PostM
odern
M
odern
Corporate
states
Industrial
Rational
Socio
centric
Traditional
Early
nations
Agrarian
Ethno
centric
Bureaucratic
Pre-rational
Tribal
Feudal
M
agical
Ego
centric
M
ythic
Values/
mindsets
Behaviour/
empirical
Culture/
worldviews
Society
systems
Perspectives – AQAL Drivers – Stages & Quadrants of Development

Perspectives – Domains of change – Quadrants and Quadrivia
Self City or consumption or community, etc.
‘XXXX’ viewed
from a personal
perspective
–
through personal
mindsets & values
‘XXXX’ viewed from a
social & systems
perspective –
(data and observation
driven)
‘XXXX’ viewed from
an empirical
perspective –
(data and observation
driven)
‘XXXX’ viewed from a
cultural perspective –
through group
culture & worldviews
Psychological
drivers
(new manifestation)
Cultural
drivers
(new manifestation)
Social (systems)
manifestation
(new driver)
Behavioural
manifestation
(new driver)
AQAL Quadrants AQAL Quadrivia
All tetra-meshed All tetra-meshed

Integral Change
Beliefs/mindset (individuals)
Determine Values Centre of Gravity (VCG)
(a number of instruments are available to measure VCG)
Communications:
1. to nudge ‘improvements’ at current VCG (short term)
2. to transform to higher levels of understanding (long
term)
- stories, messages, school programs, social media,
advertising etc. Peer group pressure, role models etc.
Cultural views (communities etc.)
Determine Dominant Mode of Discourse (DMD)
(a number of instruments are available to measure DMD)
Communications:
1. to nudge ‘improvements’ at current DMD (short term)
2. to transform to higher levels of understanding (long
term)
- stories, messages, school programs, social media,
advertising etc. Peer group pressure, role models etc.
Behaviour (individuals)
To change Personal Behaviour both
– translational healthier at same level (horizontal)
- transformational towards a higher stage of development
(vertical)
- new laws & guidelines/instructions
- programs/projects in other quadrants.
Context
Systems
in place – what needs improving & what needs replacing
- proposed systems interventions
These ‘problems’ are known as ‘wicked problems’ and
actions or interventions usually bring forth unintended
consequences. Thus constant alignment to goals of vision
needed
Projects need to be co created with
communities – not handed down
from the centre. See Modes of
Participation table (level 6 to 8 for
‘sustainable’ results)
translational or
transformational development

Second Tier Program InterventionsStagesofDriverDevelopment
‘Strange attractors’
Deep drivers Manifestationstetra-mesh
Deep drivers by Stage & Quadrant of Development
Values/
mindsets
Planet-centric
World-centric
Socio-centric
Ethno-centric
Ego-centric
ULQ
Pre-Egoic
Pre-rational
Behaviour/
empirical
Pluralistic
Rational
Bureaucratic
Metamodern
URQ
Pre-rational
Culture/
worldviews
Integral
Post-modern
Modern
Traditional
Mythic
LLQ
Magic
Society
systems
Integral commons
Global community
Informational
Value communities
Late industrial/
Early informational
Corporate states
Industrial
Early nations
Agrarian
Feudal
Early empires
LRQ
Tribal
2ndtierdrivers
1sttier1sttier1sttier1sttier1sttier

Stages of Development
AQAL Depth
LLQ
Integral (Kosmic-centric)
Sees the World as alive & evolving. Holistic & Kosmic-centric. Lives from both
individual and transpersonal Self. Almost emerging
Early Integral (Meta-Modern) (Planet-centric)
Sees natural hierarchy and systems of systems. Holds multiple perspectives.
Flexible, creative & effective. Leading edge of consciousness. Not yet embedded
Post Modern (World-centric)
Values pluralism & equality. Relativistic & sensitive. Civil rights & environmentalism.
World-centric. Early understanding of systems. Active for 50+ years
Modern (Socio-centric)
Values rationality & science. Individual & democracy. Capitalism & materialism
Risk-taking & self reliance. Active for 300+ years
Traditional/Late Empires (Ethno-centric)
(nationalistic). Values rules, roles & discipline. Faith in a transcendent God or Order.
Socially conservative. Active for 2500+ years
Feudal/Early Empires (Ego-centric)
vigilant & aggressive. Impulsive & ruthless. Courageous, determined and powerful.
Active for 15,000+ years
Indigenous/Tribal (Pre-egoic)
Sees the world as enchanted. Values ritual & deep community. Individual
subordinate to the group. Active for 50,000+ years
Archaic (Pre-egoic)
Dawning self-awareness. Survives through instinct, intuition & banding with others.
Active for 250,000+ years 1st
Tier2nd
Tier

Guide to understand the manifestation of unhealthy and healthy version of each Stage: LLQ
Unhealthy manifesta.on > Healthy manifestation <
Witchcraft, curses and spells. War potions to encourage
conflict. Faction fighting, grudges.
Warm, supportive nests. Ritual, tradition and magic.
Healthy use of shaman. Belief in animistic spirit.
Tribal
pre-egoic
Strong self-image. Expressiveness in sport, music,
the arts. Breaking free from barriers.
Warlords, violence, hit squads, gangsterism. Lack of guilt,
excessive bravado,
Feudal/EE
ego-centric
Rigid ideology, puniAve holy wars, zealotry,
depersonalisaAon of ‘enemies’. Heavy-handed bureaucracy
Truth, honour, justice, discipline, work ethic, sacrifice for
the greater good.
Traditional
ethno-centric
Crass materialism, dishonest government and business,
shady dealing. Contamination of the environment for profit.
Destructive, competitive, gamesmanship.
Entrepreneurialism, ambition. Desire to improve, to be
best. Attitude of thrive and help thrive. Expand economic
cake. Produce the middle class .
Modern
socio-centric
Naive egalitarianism within moral crusades. Compassion
becomes patronising contempt. Romanticises the under-
privileged. Develops a narrow view of human diversity.
Demands piety, harmony and understanding above all.
Beyond materialism and dogma. Focuses on warm inter-
personal relations. Promotes affiliation and personal
growth. Supports consensus and community. Softens
edges in conflict. Genuine concern for others.
Post
Modern
world-centric
Big-picture view of life systems. Values what is natural –
Focuses on competency, responsibility, and freedom of
choice. Rejects status, conformity, authoritarian
structures. Information and knowledge-based decision
making. Capable of fearless, creative problem solving.
Often drops out, stays on side-lines or “does own thing”
regardless. Shows little passion for others. Absorbed in self-
interest. Pursues a variety of interests based on self-
motivation. Often “lets things be” to excess.
Early
integral
Planet-centric
In tune with large scale of planetary concerns. Can “see”
everything at once. Thinks in holographic mosaics.
Respects all life – and the implicit order within the
universe. Understands mega-systems in nature, social
relations, evolution, business and the need to preserve
Plant Earth for future generations.
Becomes abstract, other-worldly, tuned into frequencies
and energy systems that transcend the anything practical.
Little use for people or community because of interaction
with life forces in nature, through media and information
net-works. Often condescending to those who are not
“tuned in”
Integral
kosmo-centric

Lines of Development – Intentional Quadrant (ULQ deep drivers)

Integral MENTORS
The ‘Walk’ The ‘Systems’The ‘Talk’ The ‘Star’ &
Shadow
The
COG
Personal
Alignment
Action-Logic
Leadership
Development
Values
Personal
Development
Self-Identity
Personal
Development
The Leading
edge of
thought
the ‘Talk’
The trailing
tail of action
the ‘Shadow’
The centre
of action
the ‘Walk’
Stages of Lines of Development - Intentional Quadrant - ULQ
developmental
pull
the ‘Star’

Sociocentric
Self/Values Stages of Development

Self/Values Stages of Development

Collective
Subjec-ve
Objective
Individual
Global*deepdrivers
Local** surface drivers UR
Local**surfacedrivers
Global* deep drivers LR
Local**surfacedrivers
Global*deep driversLL
Local**surface drivers
Global*deepdrivers
UL
* global
regional
national
community
Individual internal
Mappingindividual
intensions
Groupexperiences
ofCulture,values
Mapping group
culture, worldviews etc.
Individual Objective
Mapping
individualbehaviour
Mapping global social
systems
Data+systemic
informaJonﬂows
personal
-behaviour
-empirical data
-diet
-behaviours
-diets
-data
-information
-eco/enviro
-social
-etc.
Global
-worldviews
-culture
-meaning
-worldviews
-culture
-meaning
Structural
Stages
-values
-mindsets
-meaning
personal
-mindset
-meaning
-values
SOCIAL SYSTEMS
manifestations
-political
-economic
-agriculture
-environmental
-ecological
-geographical
-education
-health
-consumption
-legal
-mobility
-infrastructure
-communication
OBJECTIVE
3rd person data
manifestations
-lifestyles
-diet
-consumption
-political
-economic
-environmental
-ecological
-geographical
-education
-health
-legal
-mobility
SUBJECTIVE
1st Person data’#
Drivers
-psychology
-mindsets
-values
-morals
-spiritual
-emotional
-aesthetic
COLLECTIVE
2nd Person ‘data’#
Drivers
-culture
-worldviews
-meaning
1
2
3
4
6 8
5 7
#zones
Stages of development
**Local
individual
personal
# includes ‘warm data’
domains
tetra-
meshed
Quadrivia - ‘City’ mapped from four perspective - GLOBAL/LOCAL*

Intentional drivers
Social manifestation
Behavioural manifestation
Cultural drivers
-poliCcal
-economic
-agriculture
-environmental
-ecological
-geographical
-educaCon
-health
-consumpCon
-legal
-mobility
-infrastructure
-communicaCon
-culture
-worldviews
-meaning
-relationships
-customs
-group beliefs
-myths
-dominant mode
of discourse
OBJECTIVE
-lifestyles
-diet
-consumption
-political
-economic
-environmental
-ecological
-geographical
-education
-health
-legal
-mobility
SUBJECTIVE
-mindsets
-values
-morals
-spiritual
-emotional
-aesthetic
-personal beliefs
psychology
Map 2
#zone
Map4
#zone
Map
COLLECTIVE
drivers
6
#zone
Quadrivia - ‘City’ mapped from four perspective - GLOBAL/LOCAL*
* global deep drivers
Map8
#zone SOCIAL
SYSTEMS
*Local manifesting
of global
individual
personal
domains
tetra-
meshed
# includes ‘warm data’

BEHAVIOR
Individual-Exterior: Brain and Organism
The visible, objective, external reality of an
individual
Context: empirically measurable individual
qualities; physical boundaries or surfaces;
biological features; brain chemistry; bodily states;
physical health; behaviors; skills; capabilities;
actions; etc.
Examples of areas addressed: energy level of a
practitioner; nutritional intake; conduct toward
environment or opposite sex; response to rules and
regulations; money management; computer
skills; acidity;
Tools for transformation: e.g., diet; hygiene;
exercise; skill-building; clear rules, regulations, and
guidance from a respected authority; use of
litigation to enforce regulations
EXPERIENCE
Individual-Interior: Self and Consciousness
The invisible, subjective, internal reality of an
individual
Context: self-identity and consciousness;
intentions; personal values; attitude; religious or
spiritual beliefs; commitment (e.g., cognitive,
emotional, moral); cognitive capacity; depth of
responsibility; degree of care for others and the
environment; etc.
Examples of areas addressed: psychological
health and development; educational level;
emotional intelligence; motivation and will;
understanding of one's role in the community and
impact on the environment; personal goals; the
practitioner's intrapersonal intelligence, mental
model, and self-knowledge;
Tools for transformation: e.g., psychotherapy;
religious or spiritual counseling; phenomenological
research; introspection; goal-setting;
Upper Quadrants

SYSTEMS
Collective-Exterior: Social Systems
& Environments
The visible, inter-objective, external realities of
groups
Context: visible societal structures; systems &
modes of production (economic, political, social,
informational, educational, technological);
strategies; policies; work processes; technologies;
natural systems, processes & interactions in the
environment
Examples of areas addressed: stability &
effectiveness of economic & political systems;
legal frameworks; strength of tech., educational &
healthcare infrastructure; poverty alleviation;
actual power, class, race & gender inequities; job
creation & trade; corporate regulation;
organizational structure; food security; health of
local biota or global biosphere; climate change;
restoration, protection & sustainable use of natural
resources;
Tools for transformation: e.g., policy-making;
capacity building; systems thinking; "upstream"
strategies; organizational reengineering; micro-
credit & micro-enterprise;
CULTURE
Collective-Interior: Cultures and Worldviews
The invisible, inter-subjective, internal realities of
groups
Context: shared values and worldviews; shared
meaning; mutual resonance; cultural norms,
boundaries and mores; language; customs;
communication; relationships; symbolism; agreed
upon ethics; etc.
Examples of areas addressed: cultural
"appropriateness"; collective vision; relationship
between practitioners and the community; relationship
amongst communityIfamilyIorganization members;
language differences; collective interpretation of
power, class, race and gender inequities; collective
perception of the environment and pollution
Tools for transformation: e.g., dialogue; community-
directed development; inclusive decision making;
consensus-based strategic planning; organizational
learning; support groups (religious or secular); trust
building exercises techniques; community visioning;
cooperative participation; storytelling; collective
introspection; meme development and propagation
Lower Quadrants : The context

Transforming Individuals
UPPER LEFT
Experience
Involves the psychological and cognitive processes
involved in making meaning, constructing identity,
structuring reasoning, and forming worldviews;
perspectives of roles within the community, society,
environment and world; attitudes, feelings self-
concept, and value systems.
Practices tend to be qualitative and subjective;
some examples include:
• self-reflection/introspection
• contemplation
• self-inquire
• body scanning
• journaling
• goal-setting
• meditation
• prayer
• rituals
• vision quests
• wild-nature experiences
UPPER RIGHT
Behaviour
Involves physical health, intentional behaviour, skills,
capabilities, such as nutritional intake; conduct
towards the environment, or the opposite sex;
routines; responses to rules and regulations; birth
control use; money management; computer skills.
Practices tend to be quantitively, using scientific
measurement and diagnostic tests; some examples
include:
• social indicators (life-expectancy rates, literacy
rates, infant mortality rates, etc.)
• diet and hygiene
• preventative medicine
• exercise
• skill-building and training
• technical capacity building
• rules, regulations, and guidance

Transforming Collectives in which Individuals are embedded
LOWER LEFT
Culture
Involves worldviews, social norms, customs and
shared values that (subtly or explicitly) inform
relationships, community processes, mutual
understanding and social appropriateness.
Practices tend to be qualitative and intersubjective;
some examples include:
• dialogue
• participatory methodologies
• focus groups
• collective visioning
• trust-building exercises
• group facilitations
• participant-observer techniques
• nonviolent communication
• storytelling
• appreciative inquiry
• collective introspection
LOWER RIGHT
Systems
Involves the quantifiable, measurable and exterior
components of development, such as diagnostic
statistics, ecological and economic systems, and
social institutions and political arrangements.
Practices tend to be quantitively, using scientific
measurement and diagnostic tests; some examples
include:
• quantitative research
• scientific studies
• monitoring and evaluation
• gap analysis
• stakeholder analysis
• diagnostic testing
• rapid appraisals
• skill building
• policy-making
• technical/social capacity development

Perspectives : Stages of Development {ULQ)
Achiever
Socio-centric
(Modern
rational)
Self is operating
from an expanded
third-person
perspective.
Sees itself & others
in linear time, past
to future. Effective
and results
orientated.
2-5 years
Consciously thinks
about linear time
- a one-dimensional
linear awareness’
(past to future)
Pragmatic.
Open to feedback if
it helps achieve
goals.
A kind of single-loop
feedback that leads
to first-order change
in behaviour.
Systematic-productive power
and morality of ‘authority,
association and principle’.
Makes goal orientated
contractual/pragmatic
agreements.
System effectiveness rules
Craft-Logic
(Independent power)
Action
Logics
Perspectives Timeframes Feedback Power
Opportunist
Ego-centric
(Post Tribal)
A selfish first-person
perspective, what’s
in it for me?
Weeks to months.
Now.
(No conscious
awareness of time)
Not open to
feedback.
Power motivated by own
needs.
Morality of authority
(Dependent)
Diplomat
Bureaucrat
Ethno-centric
(Traditional)
Second-person
perspectives of
others; peer group,
family, culture or
religion
Months – year
(No conscious
awareness of time)
Not open to
feedback.
Receives feedback as
criticism or
‘disapproval’
Diplomatic-power and the
morality of association (thy
will not mine).
Social norms rule personal
needs
(Dependent power)
Expert
Socio-centric
(Modern
rational)
Self is immersed in
the logic of their
belief system.
A primarily third-
person perspective.
1-2 years
(Beginning conscious
awareness of
durational time
Open to feedback
from Experts in the
field of their primary
interest
Logistical-power and the
morality of principle (the
system is right).
Craft-logic rules social norms
(Dependent power)

Strategist
Planet-centric
Exit P-M to early
Integral
or metamodern
Self is operating
from an expanded
fourth-person
perspective.
Relative &
constructed gives
way to a new “post-
objective-synthetic
integrated theory”.
10-20 years
A two-dimensional
awareness of time
(adds awareness of
present time to
thinking in durational
time, past to future)
Invites feedback for
self-actualisation.
A kind of Double-
loop feedback which
can lead to second-
order change in
behaviour & strategy
(thinking)
Praxis-power.
Power directed outwards
towards optimizing
interaction of people and
systems.
Concerned with reframing,
reinterpreting situation so
that decisions support overall
principle.
Most valuable principles rule
relativism
(Inter-Independent power)
Perspectives : Stages of Development (ULQ)
Individualist
Pluralist
World-centric
(Post-modern)
Self is operating
from a fourth-
person perspective,
one that turns
inwards & and sees
the “myth of
objective reality”,
the subjectivity
behind objectivity.
Meaning is relative
& constructed.
5-10 years.
Emerging awareness
of here and now
(present time) as well
as longer term
durational time (past
and future)
Welcomes feedback
as necessary for self-
knowledge and
uncover hidden
aspects of own
behaviour,
Visionary-power.
Concerned with balancing
earlier forms of Coercive,
Diplomatic, Logistical and
Systematic power.
Adapt, create, explore new
rules where appropriate.
Relativism rules Systematic
effectiveness of any single
system.
(Independent power)
Action
Logics

Perspectives : Stages of Development (ULQ)
Action
Logics
Alchemist
(Integral)
Self is operating from
a fifth to nth-person
perspective.
Sees the limits of all
representational
maps, including
integrated ones.
Ego becomes
transparent & a limit
to further growth.
May access a ‘direct
mode of knowing’.
Up to 100 years
(multi-generational).
A three-dimensional
awareness of time
(durational time, non-
durational present time,
seeing oneself living in
the present among
others intentionally
influencing one
another’s’ futures)
Views feedback as a
natural part of living
systems.
Open to a kind of
Triple-loop feedback
which can lead to a
third-order change
behaviour, strategy
and overall goal or
mission which
changes and dissolves
into a sense of
connectedness to
‘whole’
Mutual-transforming power.
Creating transformational
opportunities for self and
others.
Deep processes and inter-
systemic evolution rule
principles.
(Inter-Independent power)

Cultures
- worldviews
Society/
Systems
- creations
- infrastructure
Behaviour
- capacities
- competences
- empirical
Psychology/
Values
- consciousness
- intention
- mindsets
Contextual
& creative
inputs from
all at each
step
Meaning
(vision)
Project
ProjectProject
Project
Project
Project
Project
Step 3
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
Step 2
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
ProjectProject
Project
ProjectProject
Project
ProjectProject
Step 1
Time
S 4
Morpho-Generative and Snippable Transformation
tetra-meshed
tetra-meshed
tetra-meshed

“Scale-linking systems imply a holism in which everything influences, or potentially
influences everything else — because everything is in some sense constantly
interacting with everything else.
Nature is infused with the dynamical interpenetration of the vast and minute, an
endless dervish mixing. Matter and energy continually flow across scales, the small
informing the large and the large informing the small ...
Unless we work with nature’s own finely tuned scale-linking systems we endanger
the stability of life on the planet...
If we are to properly include ecological concerns within design, we must take
seriously the challenge offered by scale linking. We need to discover ways to
integrate our design processes across multiple levels of scale and make these
processes compatible with natural cycles of water, energy, and material.”
Van der Ryn & Cowan

Integral Methodological Pluralism
Second Tier Communication
Second-tier solutions to social problems involve sustained inquiries into ways that will allow each wave (e.g.,
tribal, traditional, modern,, post-modern and integral) to freely explore its own potentials but in ways that
those waves would not construct if left to their own exclusionary practices. In academic settings, integral
methodological pluralism allows the creation not so much of more cross-disciplinary studies (which confirm
each other in their first-tier prejudices) but in trans-disciplinary studies (which enact a new territory of
integral displays between old rivalries).
In general, to put it in ‘modern’ terms, any sort of Integral Methodological Pluralism allows the creation of a
multi-purpose toolkit for approaching today's complex problems- -individually, socially, and globally- -with
more comprehensive solutions that have a chance of actually making a difference. Or, to say the same thing
with post-modern terms, an Integral Methodological Pluralism allows a richer diversity of interpretations of
life's text to stand forth in a clearing of mutual regard, thus marginalizing no interpretation in the process.
On an individual scale, the same approach can be applied to one's own profession, converting it into a
practice of integral law, integral medicine, integral business, integral education, integral politics, integral
ecology, integral psychotherapy and family practice, and so on. …….. Most of the tools to do all of the above
already exist (i.e., the MP of the IMP are already out there). All that is required, at least to get started, are a few
integrating principles to initiate the "integral" part of the IMP.
These heuristic principles suggest simple ways to practice on those practices already out there, thus quickly
converting any given practice into an integral practice. Let's look at three such integrative principles as
examples.
The Essence of Integral Metatheory:
1. Everybody Is Right but partial
2. Subjects do not perceive worlds but enact them.
3. Non-exclusion

For communication tools see ‘Guides for Integrally Informed Practitioners : Basic’ – Paul van Schaik vS Publishers
Underlying Values
• thinking is animistic;
• magical spirits, good and bad, swarm the earth leaving
blessings, curses, and spells which determine events.
• forms into ethnic tribes.
• the spirits exist in ancestors and bond the tribe.
• kinship and lineage establish political links.
• sounds holistic but is actually atomistic:
• there is a name for each bend in the river but no name for
the river.
What’s important
• allegiance to chief, elders, ancestors, and the clan;
• obeying the desires of spirit beings and mystical signs;
• preserving sacred objects, places, events, and memories;
• rites of passage, seasonal cycles, and tribal customs;
• kinship and lineage.
TRIBAL, magical-animistic
Retro-romantic
Respects status quo; "tribal".
Use or do:
• use storytelling,
• emotions,
drama,
• songs,
• dances,
• use no more than 20 images
Don’t:
• rely on written language and facts;
• disrespect chief, tribe, elders, ancestors;
• desecrate sacred grounds;
• violate taboos or ritual ways;
• introduce ambiguity;
• threaten family
How or who through to communicate:
• counsel from revered elders, chieftain, or shaman;
• from within the family/tribe/clan;
• through spirit/Natural realm signals;
• the word and ways of ancestors
Self-Identity
• often found in very young children, who are governed by
their impulses;
• adults at this stage have an inadequate conception of the
complexities of life and may easily feel confused and
overwhelmed;
• have an expedient morality (actions are only bad if one is
caught).

Underlying Values
• first emergence of a self distinct from the tribe;
• powerful, impulsive, egocentric, heroic.
• mythic spirits, dragons, beasts, and powerful people.
• feudal lords protect underlings in exchange for obedience
and labour.
• the basis of feudal empires—power and glory.
• the world is a jungle full of threats and predators.
• conquers, out-foxes, and dominates;
• enjoys self to the fullest without regret or remorse.
POST TRIBAL, ego-centric, power, magic-mythic
Heroic
Challenges status quo; reject order; fight 'the system"; "macho".
What’s important
• power, spontaneity, heroism, immediate gratification;
• standing tall, calling the shots, receiving respect, and getting
attention;
• being daring, impulsive, and enjoying oneself without
regret;
• conquering, outsmarting, dominating
• Assertion of self over the system or Nature; obtain power
and be free; respect; the "Law of the Jungle";
• impulsivity and immediate reward; toughness;

POST TRIBAL, egocentric, power, magic-mythic
• How or who through to communicate:
• Person with recognized power or something to offer;
straight- talking Big Boss;
• respected, revered, or feared other;
• celebrated "idol" with reputation;
• someone of proven; trustworthiness
Use or do:
• demonstrate "What's in it for me, now?";
offer "Immediate gratification if ...";
• challenge and appeal to machismo/strength;
• point out heroic status and legendary potential;
• be flashy, unambiguous, reality-based, and strong;
• use simple language and fiery images/ graphics; appeal to
narcissistic tendencies
Don’t:
• challenge power or courage;
• shame or put down person! group;
• move onto turf;
• be derisive and laugh; taunt as an outsider;
• appear or talk weak; make excuses
Self-Identity
• first step toward self-control of impulses;
• sense of vulnerability and guardedness;
• fight/flight response is very strong;
• very attack-oriented and win/lose in nature;
• short-term horizon;
• focus on concrete things and personal advantage;
• sees rules as loss of freedom;
• feedback heard as an attack
Slums - gangs

Underlying Values
• Life has meaning, direction, and purpose, with outcomes
determined by an all powerful Other or Order.
• This righteous Order enforces a code of conduct based on
absolutist and unvarying principles of right and wrong.
• Violating the code or rules has severe, perhaps everlasting
repercussions.
• Following the code yields rewards for the faithful. Basis of
ancient nations.
• Rigid social hierarchies;
• Paternalistic;
• One right way and only one right way to think about
everything.
• Law and order;
• Impulsivity controlled through guilt;
• Concrete-literal and fundamentalist belief;
• Obedience to the rule of Order.
TRADITIONAL, Mythic, Ethnocentric
stewardship
Manages society from a single secular or religious framework
"conformist"
What’s important
• sacrificing self for a transcendent Cause, (secular or religious)
Truth, mission, future reward; laws, regulations, and rules;
• discipline, character, duty, honour, justice, and moral fibre;
• righteous living; controlling impulsivity through guilt;
• following absolutistic principles of right and wrong, black and
white; - Being faithful, maintaining order and harmony;
• one right way to think/do;
• convention, conformity.

TRADITIONAL, Mythic, Ethnocentric
• Rightful, proper kind of authority;
• a higher position in the One True Way;
• down chain of command; according to rules;
• person with position, power, and rank;
• in compliance with tradition and precedent
Use or do:
• invoke duty, honour, country;
• use images of discipline and obedience to higher authority;
• call for good citizenship, stewardship, self-sacrifice for a
higher cause;
• appeal to traditions, laws, order, and being prepared;
• draw upon propriety and responsibilities;
• show how behaviour will insure future rewards, require
delayed gratification, assuage guilt
Don’t:
• attack religion, country, heritage, or standards;
• desecrate symbols or Holy Books;
• put down the One True-Way;
• violate chain of command;
• disregard rules and directives;
• appear unfair or sleazy;
• use profanity
Self-Identity
• Emergence of capacity to see and respond to what others
want;
• Self-identity defined by relationship to group, whose values
impart strong sense of “shoulds” and “oughts”;
• Values that differ from one’s own are denigrated or avoided;
• Conform to norms of whatever group they want to belong to
(including gangs and peer-groups);
• Avoid inner and outer conflict;
• Think in simple terms and speak in generalities and platitudes;
• Attend to social welfare of own group;

Underlying Values
• at this wave, the self escapes from the herd mentality of
amber, and seeks truth and meaning in individualistic terms
• hypo-theotico-deductive, experimental, objective,
mechanistic, operational
• scientific in the typical sense.
• highly achievement oriented, especially toward materialistic
gains.
• the world is a chess-board on which games are played as
winners gain pre-eminence and perks over losers.
• marketplace alliances;
• manipulate earth’s resources for one’s strategic gains.
• basis of corporate states.
What’s important
• progress, prosperity, optimism, and self-reliance;
• strategy, risk-taking, and competitiveness; goals, leverage,
professional development, and mastery;
• rationality, objectivism, demonstrated results, technology,
and the power of science;
• use of the earth’s resources to spread the abundant ‘good
life’;
• advance by learning nature’s secrets and seeking the best
solutions.
MODERN : rational, world-centric, pragmatic,
Rational
Manage, use, and exploit society for profit and play
"individualist
One's own right-thinking mind; successful mentors and
models; credible professionals; sources which are
advantageous to the self-image, result from one's own
observations, or are based upon experience

• rightful, proper kind of authority;
• a higher position in the One True Way;
• down chain of command;
• according to rules; person with position, power, and rank; in
compliance with tradition and precedent
Use or do:
• appeal to competitive advantage and leverage;
• draw upon success, progress, and status motivations;
• inspire to face the challenge; call for bigger, better, newer,
faster, more popular;
• cite experts; use scientific data, calculated risks, proven
experience;
• show increased profit, productivity, quality, results;
• demonstrate as best option, strategy;
• show as way to pre-empt government intervention
Don’t:
• put down profit or entrepreneurship;
• talk about collectivization;
challenge compulsive drives;
• deny rewards for good performance;
• force sameness; trap with rules and procedures;
• seem inflexible or ordinary;
• treat as one of the herd
Self-Identity
• primary elements of adult ‘conscience’ are present, including
long-term goals, ability for self-criticism, and a deeper sense
of responsibility.
• Interested in causes, reasons, consequences, and the
effective use of time;
• future-oriented and proactive;
• initiator rather than pawn of system;
• blind to subjectivity behind objectivity;
• feel guilt when not meeting own standards or goals;
• behavioural feedback accepted.
MODERN : rational, socio-centric, pragmatic,

Underlying Values
• communitarian, human bonding, ecological sensitivity,
networking. The human spirit must be freed from greed,
dogma, and divisiveness;
• feelings and caring supersede cold rationality;
• cherishing of the earth, Gaia, life;
• against hierarchy;
• establishes lateral bonding and linking.
• permeable self, relational self, group intermeshing;
• emphasis on dialogue, relationships;
• basis of values communes (i.e., freely chosen affiliations
based on shared sentiments).
• refresh spirituality, bring harmony, enrich human potential.
What’s important
• sensitivity to others and the environment;
• feelings and caring (in response to the rationality of Orange);
• harmony and equality;
• reconciliation, consensus, dialogue, participation,
relationships, and networking; human development,
bonding and spirituality; - diversity and multiculturalism;
• relativism and pluralism;
• freeing the human spirit from greed, dogma, and
divisiveness;
• distributing the earth’s resources and opportunities equally
among all.
• systematic problem solving;
• begins to seek and value feedback.
• sensitivity to others and the environment;
• feelings and caring (in response to the rationality of Orange);
• harmony and equality;
• reconciliation, consensus, dialogue, participation,
relationships, and networking; human development,
bonding and spirituality;
• diversity and multiculturalism; - relativism and pluralism;
• freeing the human spirit from greed, dogma, and
divisiveness;
• distributing the earth’s resources and opportunities equally
among all.
• Systematic problem solving;
• Begins to seek and value feedback.
POSTMODERN : pluralistic, multicultural, world-centric
Equality
protect societies for humanity and for their intrinsic nature no matter
what their values; "Communalist"

• consensual, communitarian norms;
• enlightened colleague;
the outcome of sharing and participation; the result of self
• growth; observation of events;
• the here and now=
appeals to affect/ feelings/ emotions
Use or do:
• create a sense of belonging, sharing, harmony;
• show sensitivity to human issues, Nature, and others;
• call for an expansion of awareness, self understanding, and
liberation of the oppressed;
• use symbols of equity, humanity, and bonding; use gentle
language and Nature imagery;
• build trust, openness, exploration for growth;
• present real people and authentic emotional displays;
• encourage participation, sharing, consensus, teamwork,
community involvement
Don’t:
• assault the group's goals and ideals;
• try to get centralized control;
• reject the collective for individual accountability;
• deny affect and feelings;
• degrade quality of life or environment;
• rely on "hard facts" and exclude people factors; act elitist
Self-Identity
• makes decisions based upon their own view of reality;
• aware that interpreting reality always depends on the position
of the observer;
• more tolerant of oneself and others due to awareness of life’s
complexity and individual differences;
• questions old identities;
• more interested in personal accomplishments independent of
socially sanctioned rewards;
• Increased understanding of complexity, systemic connections,
and unintended effects of actions;
• begins to question own assumptions and those of others;
• talks of interpretations rather than truth.
Post modern Green city
POSTMODERN : pluralistic, multicultural, world-centric

Underlying Values
• qualities and responsibilities of being. Basic theme:
• live fully and responsibly as what you are and learn to
become.
• flexibility, spontaneity, functionality, knowledge,
competency;
• integration of differences into interdependent, natural
flows;
• complementing egalitarianism with natural degrees of
ranking and excellence;
• recognizing overlapping dynamic systems and natural
hierarchies.
EARLY INTEGRAL : Meta-Modern (still unfolding)
Self-Identity
• linking theory and principles with practice; dynamic
systems interactions.
• comprehends multiple interconnected systems of
relationships and processes;
• able to deal with conflicting needs and duties in constantly
shifting contexts;
• recognizes higher principles, social construction of reality;
• problem-finding not just creative problem solving; aware
of paradox, contradiction in system and self;
• sensitive to unique market niches, historical moment,
larger social movements;
• creates “positive-sum” games;
• seeks feedback as vital for growth.
Don’t:
• force rules without reasons;
• impose dysfunctional structures;
• close access to varied information or learning resources;
• pass the buck to the future;
• force groupness;
• ignore diversity of thinking.
Through most of what is currently called Teal is exit Green

Stages of Leadership Development

socio-centric
Post-tribal
STAGE (ULQ)

Planet-centric
STAGE (ULQ)

Four Quadrants of Change Framework : ULQ
Drivers
Drivers
Manifestation
Manifestation
AQAL
Flatland
no Stages

Integral Reporting

Transformative and Translative communication
There are two meta-types of communication that can occur through any medium (dialogue, media, etc.):
- transformative communications, and
- translative communications.
Transformative communication attempts to fundamentally change the way someone sees the world—so as to
foster sustainable behaviour. Many sustainability communications are transformative; they try to get people to
see things differently (such as the interconnectedness of nature and humanity) so that they choose different
actions.
Translative communication does the opposite. Striving to connect with people just as they are, motivating and
informing them in a way that is in alignment with how they already see the world. Translative communication
resonates with a person’s existing worldview, without requiring them to be a different person in order to take
action.
On the whole people rarely make major changes in how they see the world, it’s hard to trigger that change,
and the workings of that change process largely remain a mystery. As such, sustainability communications that
only focus on changing someone’s worldview has less chance of success. To reach people, and to honour
them, most sustainability communication should not encourage others to see the world anew, but rather align
the core messages with their existing worldview(s).
Translative communications for sustainability are developmentally-appropriate: they resonate with the stage(s)
of consciousness—and the correlative worldview(s)—of an audience. The more tailored sustainability
communication is to these different worldviews, the greater the chances of the communication actually ‘taking
hold’, so that it fosters sustainable behaviour.

NCCC design seeks to address all quadrants and levels include
Psychological quadrant
o Use a variety of engagement techniques,
including rhetoric, argument, artistic approaches
and storytelling, to reach individuals “where they
are” and encourage individual participation
o Use of visioning exercises to make the impact of
climate change more tangible for individuals
and to link it to their phenomenological “sense
of place”, e.g. explore how it would feel to have
different birds, insects and plants appearing and
familiar ones disappearing
Behavioural quadrant
o Offer citizen participants access to the empirical
evidence for climate change and data on
impacts of alternative responses through invited
experts
o Provide a physical environment conducive to
creative deliberation and a facilitator whose
behaviours encourage participation and
creativity
Cultural quadrant
o Encourage discursive contestation through
active facilitation and formation of small groups
with shifting membership
o Develop images and narratives of the future to
draw out the normative commitments of the
discourses represented in each forum.
Systemic quadrant
o Use information and communication
technologies to connect the forums with experts
in other locations and with each other
o Provide analysis of barriers and opportunities
for climate change response associated with
technological, economic and social systems

Integral begins with a recognition that we are evolving
through growth stages in individual consciousness and
culture.
Each of these stages has something important to offer: a
dignity, insight and capacity, which shines most brightly
when combined, or integrated, with the dignity, insights
and capacities of other stages.
This integration creates more than the sum of its parts,
giving rise to new emergent capabilities.
These capabilities include the ability to harmonize
previously conflicting perspectives and worldviews and
to see and enact solutions that have not been seen or
tried before.

Guiding principle here is that you need enough
diversity in what data you are gathering and
how you are gathering it, that you can
adequately capture impacts that are occurring
in all quadrants.
Types of data to be collected:
- third-person data (objective) such as
surveys or other quantitative ways to
measure change,
- second-person (intersubjective data) such
as data that is generated and interpreted
together as a group or within a process, and
- first-person (subjective data) such as
reflective answers, thick description, or other
qualitative descriptions (one-on-one).
Impact on Practices
(practices & conduct
carrying out work)
Impact on Systems
(policies, structures that
support innovation in
work)
Impact on Mindsets
(ways of thinking about
and approaching
problems)
Impact on Culture
(collaboration, cultural
perceptions, and social
discourse in issues)
www.integralwithoutborders.org
Second Tier Program Evaluation

LOW POINT ASSESSMENT:
Moving potential forward, addressing gaps
and sticking points
FOUR QUADRANT MAP:
Working With Complexity
Topic or Issue:Topic or Issue:
www.integralwithoutborders.org

Systems inquiry
Description: quantitative measurement of seen changes in social, economic, political
systems in which the work is carried out.
Methods: systems analysis
Methodologies: systems-analysis tools
S
E
Empirical inquiry
Description: quantitative measurement of seen changes in behaviours, for example
shifts in land-use practices, uptake of conservation practices in the household,
behavioural change in gender relations.
Methods: empiricism
Methodologies: measuring, ranking, and quantitative analysis (pre/during/post
measurement that ranks certain behaviours from 1-10 and can compare/contrast to
later assessment, after which time that data can be analysed using quantitative methods
to create graphs and figures of what percentage of behaviours changed through the
lifetime of the project.)
Integral Methodological Pluralism application - international development framework : Gail Hochachka IWB

Reflective, experiential inquiry
Description: interior felt-sense, how one feels (about oneself, org, project, issue),
Methods: phenomenology
Methodologies: personal ecology sheet
self-reflection (can use this tool to guide the process, can be an ongoing cascading reflection-stream,
and/or can be accessed through journaling).
Developmental inquiry
Description: interior personal change, developmental stages, changes in motivation, attitudes, and
values.
Methods: structuralism
Methodologies: developmental assessment (includes pre/post interviews that are carried out one-
on-one with a sample of the population and the interviewer is trained to ask the same questions that
hone in on indicators for motivational, attitudinal
R
I
Interpretive inquiry
Description: culture and meanings held by the group or community; for example, how do people
generally feel and what do they know about “conservation”, what does “conservation concession”
mean to them?
Methods: hermeneutics
Methodologies: focus group (using a guided method, shared below, as a pre/during/post method
of “taking the pulse” of the group—where motivation lies, what is working what is not, how can the
project shift and flow.
Ethno-methodological inquiry
Description: changes in social discourse, implicit “background” social norms, and shared worldview.
Method Family: ethno-methodology
Methodologies: participant-observation (using a tool with focus questions on specific domains of
change)
Integral Methodological Pluralism application - international development framework : Gail Hochachka IWB

www.integralwithoutborders.net
SECOND-PERSON DATA COLLECTION
• At the Evaluation Pod meetings and
Development Evaluation (DE) meetings
generate discussion and reflection through
prompting with skillful DE questions. Then,
harvest the insights and doing pattern-
finding; that is where indicators come in.
• Community Liaison carry out this pattern-
finding afterwards then reflect back to the
other participants later.
• During the DE sessions, do some group
pattern-finding with indicator tables written
on flip-charts, and participants use post-it
notes to tag where in the spectrum they
would say the outcome was achieved. This
is based on participant-observation and is
co-generated in a focus-group style
meeting.
FIRST-PERSON DATA
COLLECTION
• To generate thick descriptions on
these indicators (about how and
why changes occurred as they
did):
• use more in-depth reflective
questions posed within one of the
activities, such as a qualitative
question in a survey
• or by doing key-informant
interviews with a sample of the
target audience.
THIRD-PERSON DATA
COLLECTION
• Build in content from the
indicator table into the feedback
forms, proposal questions, grant
reports, forum retrospectives, etc.
• This will generate actual numbers
along the 1-5 spectrum for these
indicators, which can be
quantified and used in evaluation
analysis and reporting.
• Any thing you quantify (numbers
of participants, proposals or multi
sector tables) can be useful to
analyze and include.

Community co creation and monitoring

MetaImpact Framework
At the heart of our approach is The MetaImpact Framework, which measures 4
Types of Impact with 10 Types of Capital which produce 4 Bottom Lines.
4 Types of Impact
10 Types of Capital
4 Bottom Lines
MetaIntegral is a global transdisciplinary design firm. We support visionary leaders, teams,
and organizations to Be IMPACT. To do this we draw on and integrate a number of theories
and their associated practices including embodiment theory, design theory, integral theory,
and developmental theory. As a result we help you thrive in complexity – transforming the
world – from an embodied place of presence and purpose. We love to co-create with you –
your events, products, services, books, business models, and business ecosystems among
other things.
MetaIntegral Capital is the branch of MetaIntegral that is dedicated to the design of wisdom
economies – which are accounting systems that integrate multiple types of impact, multiple
forms of capital, and multiple bottom lines. This site is devoted to sharing with you
our MetaImpact Framework, which lies at the heart of our approach to preserving the
wholeness of individuals and systems.
www.metacapital.net

Over the last 30 years various individuals have
created multiple capital frameworks which
include anywhere between 3 and 20 different
types of capital.
We’ve done an integrative meta-analysis of over
a dozen of these frameworks to identify what are
the most important forms of capital to include in
an expanded framework and how might we
combine them into an elegant and intuitive
framework – one that not only includes essential
types of capital but highlights the different kinds
of relationship between these capitals.
In 2011 the International Integrated Reporting
Council (IIRC) began a multi-year global
initiative to develop an expanded model of
capital.
Through their process they identified six types of
capital that should be included in an integrated
report.
We have included all six of these in our model
(they are identified with an asterisk after their
name in our model).
In addition to these six we have included four
more that our analysis indicates are necessary
for a comprehensive assessment of value
creation.
Then using Integral Theory we have organized
these into four quadrants.
10 Types of Capital
www.metacapital.net

Clear Impact
One of the most common forms of impact is Clear Impact, which measures
change in stakeholder performance. Many businesses and organizations
include various metrics to assess this area of impact (e.g., skill assessments,
analytics, observation tools, and various KPIs). What all these metrics have in
common is the focus on objective criteria to track behavior and performance.
These four types of impact
combine to create a
comprehensive model
of impact …High Impact
The other main form of impact is High Impact, which measures change in
stakeholder systems (e.g., supply chains, cash flow, customer engagement) .
Many businesses and organizations include various metrics to assess this area
of impact (e.g., environmental impact assessments, financial impact
assessments, input indicators, and various KPIs). What all these metrics have
in common is the focus on interobjective or systemic criteria to track
organizational and market dynamics.
Wide Impact
Over the last decade it has become more common for organizations to
include Wide Impact, which measures change in stakeholder relationships.
With forms of network analysis and social mapping there have emerged
various metrics to assess this area of impact (e.g., 360 Assessments,
relationship mapping, interviews, and social impact assessments). What all
these metrics have in common is the focus on intersubjective criteria to track
the quality and quantity of relationships and their influence.
Deep Impact
Arguably, one of the most important forms of impact is Deep Impact, which
measures change in stakeholder experience. There is a growing awareness
among many businesses and organizations that this form of impact needs to
be included. Various metrics are used to assess this area of impact (e.g., self-
evaluations, psychometrics, satisfaction surveys, and happiness inventories).
What all these metrics have in common is the focus on subjective criteria to
track somatic, emotional, and psychological dimensions of experience.
4 Impacts
www.metacapital.net

The 10 Capitals and their forms of
measurement combine into 4 Bottom
Lines. These include the common triple
bottom line of Profit, People, and Planet
but also adds a 4th – Purpose. While a
number of 4 bottom line models have
been proposed – some of which even
include Purpose as a fourth – our
approach to having 4 bottom lines is
distinct in at least two ways.
First, the common bottom lines of Profit,
People, and Planet are often exclusively
defined in terms of what we would call
High Impact – with a focus on the systems
involved. In contrast to this we redefine
each of these bottom lines in a more
holistic and integrative fashion – building
on the important work of previous uses
but avoiding a reductive approach to
these bottom lines.
Second, we place the four bottom lines
around our four quadrant model in a way
that highlights specific relationships
between the bottom lines. For example,
each bottom line shares 2 or 3 forms of
capital as part of its constitution. This
enables an important form of integration
between all four bottom lines.
Together these 4 bottom lines
combine to form the MetaImpact
Framework.
For more information on Meta Integral and
their associated work see
www.metaintegral.org
4 Bottom Lines
www.metacapital.net

"Systems theorists are fond of saying that systems theory deals with the
“whole of reality” and thus it covers all the holistic bases. For example,
they point out that dynamic systems theory can even be used to
successfully describe the traffic patterns in large cities. And that is true—
the flow patterns of the automobiles follow specific patterns that
systems theory captures well.
But systems theory cannot tell you if the driver (i.e., the intentionality)
of a particular automobile is motivated by Red, Amber, Orange or
Green values, and so on—and yet those interior domains contain the key
not only to much of human existence and motivation, but to all of the
feelings of sentient beings throughout the planet. If all we do is
describe the traffic patterns of sentient beings—using ecology, systems
theory, chaos and complexity theory— then we have indeed reduced all
first-person consciousness to third-person objects, its, and artefacts: we
have killed all culture and consciousness."
Ken Wilber

© integralMENTORS
1st Tier
Towards an Integral View
the ‘worlds’ we live in
Tribal
Post-tribal
Traditional
Modern
Post-Modern
The minimum domains in which to understand cities
Values
Culture
Behaviour
Society
2nd Tier (Target)
the ‘worlds’ we must work from
integral
tetra-meshed
Behaviour
Society
Values
Culture
Not integrated - Siloed
Second Tier Program Design

Cultural and social
norms
that are unseen but
nevertheless inform
institutions, decision-making,
and action.
Behaviour,
actions, and
practices
that support adaptation to
climate change.
Worldviews,
values, and
“meaning-making”
that create an internal
understanding and motivation
regarding climate change
adaptation.
Systems & social
institutions
that influence
adaptation strategies
and decisions (positively
or negatively).
inte g ral
Adaptation and Change
Behaviour, actions,
and practices
that support adaptation to
climate change.
Worldviews,
values, and
“meaning-making”
that create an internal
understanding and motivation
regarding climate change
adaptation.
Cultural and social
norms
that are unseen but
nevertheless inform
institutions, decision-
making, and action.
Systems & social
institutions
that influence adaptation
strategies and decisions
(positively or negatively)
Un-integrated
What actually gives rise to adaptation?What does not gives rise to adaptation?
Siloes
integral tetra-meshed

We
LL
It
UR
I
UL
Empiricism: Explores measurable
behaviour
Structuralism: Explores patterns of
direct felt experience
Autopoiesis:
Explores self-regulating behaviour
Phenomenology:
Explores direct felt experience
by means of:
Hermeneutics:
Explores mutual understanding
Cultural Anthropology:
Explores patterns of mutual
understanding
Social Autopoiesis:
Explores self-regulating dynamics
in systems
Systems Theory
Explores functional-fit of parts
within systems
7
Surface Structure
8
Deep Structure
3
Surface Structure
4
Deep Structure
2
Deep Structure
1
Surface Structure
6
Deep Structure
5
Surface Structure
SubjectiveObjective
Inter-
Subjective
Inter-
Objective
• Genealogy,
• Developmental Psychology ….
• Interpersonal Values,
• Global Ethics …..
• Ethnomethodology,
• Cultural Studies,
• Semiotics …..
• Bio-phenomenology,
• Cognitive Sciences
• etc. …
• Biochemistry,
• Biology, Zoology,
• Behavioural Studies ….
• Socio-cybernetics,
• Communication Studies
• etc.
• Science of Politics,
• Complexity Sciences,
• Integral Economics ….
Its
LR
#Zone Dimensions of Experience Explores zone: by means of QuadQ
• Meditation
• Introspection,
• Contemplation ….
(IMP & Zones)Second Tier Program Design

Altitudes Of Development (Stages or Levels of developmental growth)
AQAL Depth
ULQ

Contrast metamodern ideas against modern and postmodern ideas
ULQ
LLQ LRQ
URQ

What causes the shift between Stages – especially in the lines - Cognitive, Self and Values. These shifts can be detected in the
language or concepts used. Also in what is seen as objective and what is subjective. Shifts usually cause discomfort and complaints
at first but if positive movement many ‘ah ha’ moments and excitement. In all these shifts life conditions are important – context
[the surface structure] causes shifts in the brain complexity or understanding [deep structure] – how no one is sure.
Transformation between Stages or Levels of Development
Pre ego-centric
tribal
pre rational
Magenta/
Purple
to
Ego-centric
feudal
pre-modern
Red
First Tier Shifts

First Tier Shifts
Ego-centric
to
Ethno-centric
nations/empires
bureaucratic
Amber/Blue
IntegralMENTORS Guides – [basic]
Amber
to
Orange
Aspires to better life now
for self
Challenges higher
authority to produce
tangible results
Seeks one best way
among many options
Awakening of a
dependent-seeking self
who challenges higher
authority and tests
possibilities
Once stability and security are achieved, and the afterlife is also
guaranteed, the time comes when people begin to question the price.
The saintly, puritanical , rigid, sacrificial lifestyle is devoid of pleasure,
leisure or adventurous thought. Once again, as with the breaking of
tribal bonds, people seeks to free themself from the restrictions and
constraints of an authoritarian punitive “suffer now to gain later” world
view. New, excess energy is produced in the system, creating
perturbations and at first subtle attacks on the established Blue [Amber]
Order. Deviation surfaces. The basic assumptions of “the system” are
questioned. A new elitism is born. The evidence of the BETA state is
everywhere, revisionist views abound. Blue [Amber] thinkers attempt to
regain control and stability by a frantic First Order Change mandate.
Heretics are burned at the stake. Non-conformists have to leave hearth
and home to pursue their personal destiny elsewhere.
Orange Discovers material wealth Once assured of their material satisfaction (not necessarily their
Ethno-centric
to
Socio-centric
modern
rational
Orange

First Tier Shifts
who challenges higher
authority and tests
possibilities
questioned. A new elitism is born. The evidence of the BETA state is
everywhere, revisionist views abound. Blue [Amber] thinkers attempt to
regain control and stability by a frantic First Order Change mandate.
Heretics are burned at the stake. Non-conformists have to leave hearth
and home to pursue their personal destiny elsewhere.
Orange
to
Green
Discovers material wealth
does not bring happiness
or peace
Renewed need for
community, sharing, and
richer inner life
Sensitivity to have, and
have-not gaps
Awakening a sociocentric
self who strives for
belonging and acceptance
to discover inner harmony
Once assured of their material satisfaction (not necessarily their
neighbours) people discover in themself a spiritual void. They have
conquered the world, they have explored everywhere, even into space.
They have all the human comforts that can be manufactured and
purchased. Yet they has not achieved happiness. they finds themself a
neophyte in a subjectivistic, humanistic World. They have achieved the
good life but at a price. They are envied - perhaps respected - but not
liked. Life becomes shallow, meaningless and jaded, their lifestyle has
cost them health, family affection, self-respect and what they now
perceives to be most important of all - people, community, sensitivity
and human Warmth.
Shift to Second Tier
Green
to
Teal
Overwhelmed by
economic and emotional
costs
Confronted by
chaos/disorder
Need for tangible results
and functionality
Knowing moves above
feeling
In spite of their good intentions and social programmes, people in the
Green band of thinking does not produce the ideal state they
envisaged. After spending all the money, mounting the protest marches
and boycotts and forcing “freedom and equality” into the Law of the
land, people are still not equal. Billions are still not free. Evil
international troublemakers still emerge. Available resources are
shrinking. Nationalism and ethnicity reappear, threatening the very
fabric of community. Their world is in shreds and they cannot
understand why ~ it all felt so good at the time. At this point the Green
mini-crucible produces a new alloy, a new paradigm - one that containsPeople do not perceive worlds but enact them. Different mindsets bring forth different worlds.
Socio-centric
to
World-centric
post modern
pluralistic
Green

Second Tier Shifts
Sensitivity to have, and
have-not gaps
Awakening a sociocentric
self who strives for
belonging and acceptance
to discover inner harmony
good life but at a price. They are envied - perhaps respected - but not
liked. Life becomes shallow, meaningless and jaded, their lifestyle has
cost them health, family affection, self-respect and what they now
perceives to be most important of all - people, community, sensitivity
and human Warmth.
Shift to Second Tier
Green
to
Teal
Overwhelmed by
economic and emotional
costs
Confronted by
chaos/disorder
Need for tangible results
and functionality
Knowing moves above
feeling
Awakening of an
inquiring, independent
self who no longer needs
approval yet can
collaborate
In spite of their good intentions and social programmes, people in the
Green band of thinking does not produce the ideal state they
envisaged. After spending all the money, mounting the protest marches
and boycotts and forcing “freedom and equality” into the Law of the
land, people are still not equal. Billions are still not free. Evil
international troublemakers still emerge. Available resources are
shrinking. Nationalism and ethnicity reappear, threatening the very
fabric of community. Their world is in shreds and they cannot
understand why ~ it all felt so good at the time. At this point the Green
mini-crucible produces a new alloy, a new paradigm - one that contains
the elements necessary for a major quantum leap in the understanding
of the species Homo sapiens, and at a level not even imagined in earlier
systems of thought. In the Orange band the hidden secrets of the
physical universe demand our attention. In the Green band the feelings
of people are paramount. “Getting along with” is valued above
“getting ahead”. In the Yellow [Teal] band a new self- interest returns,
but in a higher form designed for thinking in natural, evolutionary, living
systems.
Teal
to
Senses order within chaos
Search for guiding
principles
Powerful insights gained in the Yellow [Teal] band and implemented in
an attempt to solve the global mess caused by the first six levels of
human existence, lack means of enforcement. Destruction is still
What causes the shift between Stages – especially in the lines - Cognitive, Self and Values. These shifts can be
detected in the language or concepts used. Also in what is seen as objective and what is subjective. Shifts usually
cause discomfort and complaints at first but if positive movement many ‘ah ha’ moments and excitement. In all
these shifts life conditions are important – context [the surface structure] causes shifts in the brain complexity or
understanding [deep structure] – how no one is sure.
World-centric
to
Planet-centric
early integral
meta-modern
Teal/Yellow

58
collaborate
of people are paramount. “Getting along with” is valued above
“getting ahead”. In the Yellow [Teal] band a new self- interest returns,
but in a higher form designed for thinking in natural, evolutionary, living
systems.
Teal
to
Turquoise
Senses order within chaos
Search for guiding
principles
Whole-earth problems
arise as technology
connects everybody
Powerful insights gained in the Yellow [Teal] band and implemented in
an attempt to solve the global mess caused by the first six levels of
human existence, lack means of enforcement. Destruction is still
rampant. The ethic: "Recognise, truly notice what life is and you shall
know how to behave” makes no sense at all to people with earlier
world views. Therefore practicality. If it is realistic that an individual
Second Tier Shifts
Planet-centric
to
Kosmic-centric
integral
Turquoise/
CoralA Broader Framework
Spirituality backed with
physics
Awakening of an
inquiring, independent
self who no longer needs
approval yet can
collaborate
should suffer, suffer he should. If it is realistic to be happy, then it is
good to be happy. If the situation calls for authoritarianism, then it is
proper to be authoritarian. If the situation calls for democracy, one
should be democratic. Behaviour is “right” and “proper" it is based on
todays best possible evidence. What was “right” yesterday may not be
so today. The supreme issue in GT is restoration of the world so it may
continue – not just human life but life it self. For the first time people
are able to face existence in all it dimensions even to the point of
valuing inconsistencies, opposites and flat contradictions. This mini
crucible ultimately produces a human being who find that the answers
are not within ‘reality’, currently available information or historical
evidence.
Turquoise TBA TBA
An example of how the ‘talk’ and the ‘walk’ differ for an individual operating out of a Green centre of gravity

The Worlds ‘I’ Inhabit (States) - U Theory (ULQ)
1. Holding the Space
Listen to what life calls you
to do
2. Observing
Attend with your mind
wide open
suspending
redirecting
3. SENSING
Connect with your heart
letting go
4. PRESENCING
Connect to the deepest source
of your self and will
Who is the Self?
What is my Work?
Open Mind
Open Heart
Open Will
letting come
enacting
embodying
5. CRYSTALLISING
Access the power of intention
6. PROTOTYPING
Integrating head, heart, hand
7. PREFORMING
Play the ‘Macro-Violin

Development occurs through the interplay between person and
environment, not just by one or the other. It is a potential and can
be encouraged and facilitated by appropriate support and
challenge.
The depth, complexity, and scope of what people notice can
expand throughout life. Yet no matter how evolved we become,
our knowledge and understanding is always partial and
incomplete.
As development unfolds, autonomy, freedom, tolerance for
difference and ambiguity, as well as flexibility, reflection and skill
in interacting with the environment increase, while defences
decrease.
Overall, worldviews evolve from simple to complex, from static to
dynamic, and from egocentric to socio-centric to world-centric.
Each later stage in the sequence is more differentiated,
integrated, flexible and capable of functioning optimally in a
world that is rapidly changing and becoming more complicated.
People's stage of development influences what they notice or can
become aware of, and therefore what they can describe,
articulate, influence, and change.
The main reason that learning is as slow as it is, is that learning
means giving up ideas, habits, and values. Some of the old
“learning” that has to be given up or “unlearned” was useful in the
past and is still useful to some of the people in the society. Some of
the things that people have to unlearn are traditions that are dear
to people, and that may be part of their personal character
development. Some of what needs to be forgotten are ways of
living that still have important values to people.
Modes of Participation

1. Engagement to technical
3. Community participation to
superficial because it hasn’t
connected with the local context
5. Planning is comprehensive
yet rigid
2. Focused on evidence, not
buy-in
4. Little ownership, fleeting
motivation
6. Implementation stalls due
to, disconnect with local
meaning-making,
2. Made meaning in local context
4. Motivation to act
6. Successful implementation
through commitment,
motivation, ownership,
meaning-making and
awareness
1. Awareness of the issue
3. Local ownership over process
5. Planning for adaptation
community wide
participation
Spiral of Community Engagement

“In finding the world as we do, we forget all we did to find it
as such, and when we are reminded of it in retracing our
steps back to indicators, we find little more than a mirror-to-
mirror image of ourselves and the world.
In contrast with what is commonly assumed, a description,
when carefully inspected, reveals the properties of the
observer. We observers, distinguish ourselves precisely by
distinguishing what we apparently are not, the world."
Spencer Brown

Key to an Integral approach to urban design
is the notion that although other aspects of
urban life are important, people (sentient
beings), as individuals and communities, are
the primary ‘purpose’ for making cities
thriveable. All other aspects (technology,
transport & infra-structure, health, education,
sustain-ability, economic development, etc.)
although playing a major part, are
secondary.
Urban Hub Series
These books are a series of presentations for
the use of Integral theory or an Integral
Meta-framework in understanding cities and
urban Thriveability.
Although each can stand alone, taken
together they give a more rounded
appreciation of how this broader framework
can help in the analysis and design of
thriveable urban environments.
Guides for Integrally Informed
Practitioners
The Guides for Integrally Informed
Practitioners (adjacent) cover much of the
theory behind the Integral Meta-framework
used in these volumes. For topics covered in
other volumes in this series see the following
page.

Urban Hub
Series
Hardcopies can be
purchased from Amazon
Limited distribution Pub. February 2020
Limited distribution
Pub. April 2020
Pdf versions are gratis
to view & download @:
https://www.slideshare.net/
PauljvsSS
issuu.com/paulvanschaik
Pub. January 2020
Pub. March 2020

UrbanHub
This volume is part of an ongoing series of guides to
integrally inform practitioners.
This book explores the deep drives that determine
the actions we take and the worlds we inhabit from
a Second Tier perspective.
19
IntegralUrbanHub
DeepDrivers
AnIntegralTheoryofChangeandaframeworkforaction
Secondtierinterventions
ThriveableCities
A series of books from integralMENTORS Integral
UrbanHub work – on Thriveable Cities

Urban Hub 19 : Deep Drivers - An Integral Theory of Change and a framework for action - Thriveable Cities

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Urban Hub 19 : Deep Drivers - An Integral Theory of Change and a framework for action - Thriveable Cities

Similar to Urban Hub 19 : Deep Drivers - An Integral Theory of Change and a framework for action - Thriveable Cities (20)

More from Paul van Schaık

More from Paul van Schaık (11)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Urban Hub 19 : Deep Drivers - An Integral Theory of Change and a framework for action - Thriveable Cities