Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon motion has 2 orbits
The hypothesis explanation
- The Earth moon is so specific planet in the solar system and so effective in its general geometry
- Uranus and Neptune effect on the moon orbit creation and cause its regression by 19 degrees yearly
- Uranus and Neptune orbital inclinations are created by the effect on their interactions in the moon orbit
- Mars orbital inclination is created based on the moon orbit interactions
- The moon orbital motion has 2 orbits both perpendicular on one another
- Venus axial tilt and orbital inclination are created as a result of Uranus perpendicularity on the moon orbits.
Paper conclusion
- Many of Planets data can be created by their values only if there are 2 orbits for the moon motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
- The moon orbital triangle is created to explain that, many data in the moon orbit is created based on Pythagoras rule
- This paper provide the moon orbital triangle to be analyzed geometrically as deep as possible
Paper Claim
- The moon motion depends on Pythagoras triangle, and because of that the moon orbital triangle analysis can solve many basic questions in the moon motion
- The moon orbital triangle proves that, there's another force effect on the moon motion, this force is seen in (Point A) in the moon orbital triangle.
Paper question
- Why the moon orbital triangle is a significant triangle?
- Because the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its motion points, why? because the moon daily displacement isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit – instead – the moon uses part of this displacement to be the real displacement suitably to the orbit radius – that's why the moon orbital triangle is a cornerstone in the moon motion definition –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Causes To Create A New Rate Of Time In The Solar System Motion
Let's remember the different rates of time argument in following:
- I have discovered many of light motion features in Planet Motion
- Because of that, I have tried to explain how such features are created, then I had to suggest the 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- For detailed investigation I had to suggest the 2nd hypothesis (Light Motion For 1 Second Causes Planet Motion For 1 Day)
- The research 2nd hypothesis suggests that, there are different rate of time in the solar system, then I have concluded the basic rule to create these different rates of time which is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
Then
- I have found that, the original rate of time which is (1 Second Of Light Motion Is Equivalent For 1 Solar Day (86400 seconds) Of Planet Motion) this rate of time is valid always in the solar system motion ….
But
- In the Earth moon orbit, this rate is changed into one more rate of time which is (1 Day Of The Sun Is Equivalent Of A Year (365.25 Days) Of Earth)
i.e.
- The 1st rate of time is found generally in the solar system but the 2nd rate of time is found in the Earth moon orbit – the nest question should be why??
- This is happened because of Venus & Mars Motions Interactive Effect On The Earth Moon Orbit And Motion.. so this paper tries to discover the geometrical mechanism by which this effect is created…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
Uranus Day Period =17.2 Hours
This Value Depends On Pluto Orbital Inclination 17.2 Degrees
i.e.
Pluto Energy is transported to Uranus – This Process proves Energy Transportation through the solar group-
Based on that
Pluto Data (Energy) is seen in Uranus Data (Energy) but with different unit – where units change is one of Energy Transportation Geometrical Features
Why Energy Transportation needs to change the units? To provide the required flexibility for Energy Transportation process
Shortly…
Uranus Day Period (17.2 hours) is resulted directly from Pluto Orbital Inclination (17.2 degrees)
This hypothesis should be a direct application on my theory of Energy Transportation Through the Solar Group – and If we can prove this hypothesis – that will support the theory proves strongly
Why there's No velocity higher than Light Velocity C =300000km/sec?
Because
- The Matter is created from light beams coherence (according to Young Experiment- The Main Hypothesis)
- The Time is created as the Matter Changing measurement
- Our body (matter) is produced by the same method, from this light beams coherence
- Our bodies are connected with specific Light velocity and specific time rate because our bodies are produced by specific Light Beams coherence
What does that mean? ..i.e.
- If there's a light velocity higher than C we can't realize it, why? Because Our Body defines only this specific time which is produced from this specific light
Now we can see much better
- Why we can't understand easily the solar System geometry? Because NOT all data is available for us! And why NOT? Because Our Body Connected Us To Specific Category Of Data…
o So we connected to specific light beam (standard velocity C)
And
o We connected to specific time defined by our body changes
So the Special Theory of Relativity is Correct
No Velocity higher than C is available in our Universe
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion Gerges francis
Paper Claim
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Force Effect On The Earth Moon = 42% Of The Sun Mass Gravity Force Effect On Pluto
- Because the sun gravity keeps Pluto in its orbit, that tells Jupiter force must have an effect on the Earth moon motion
- Based on that, Jupiter gravity is the second force effect on the Earth moon motion
- Such effect can't be performed, neither by Mars because of its very small mass nor by Saturn because of its far distance
- That tells Jupiter Mass Gravity must have a greater effect on Mars motion than its effect on the Earth moon motion, and That's True and because of that (Mars Eccentricity = 0.094) but (The Moon Eccentricity = 0.055), proving that Jupiter gravity effect on Mars so greater than its effect on the Earth moon motion.
Shortly,
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The sun data shows relativistic effects and motions Gerges francis
Abstract
- The Sun Data shows Relativistic Effects.
i.e.
- There's a physical point in the solar group moves with c velocity relative to another physical point in the solar group. and this high velocity causes the relativistic effects which are observed and recorded in this paper
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis shows that, Mars Original Orbital Distance was = 84 million km. but because of the relativistic effects, Mars had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance = 227.9 million km.
- This paper provide analyzed data and explanations to prove these 2 facts which are:
1. There's motion with c velocity inside the solar group
2. Mars immigrated from his original point at orbital distance 84 million km to his new orbital distance 227.9 million km
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
- The moon orbital triangle is created to explain that, many data in the moon orbit is created based on Pythagoras rule
- This paper provide the moon orbital triangle to be analyzed geometrically as deep as possible
Paper Claim
- The moon motion depends on Pythagoras triangle, and because of that the moon orbital triangle analysis can solve many basic questions in the moon motion
- The moon orbital triangle proves that, there's another force effect on the moon motion, this force is seen in (Point A) in the moon orbital triangle.
Paper question
- Why the moon orbital triangle is a significant triangle?
- Because the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its motion points, why? because the moon daily displacement isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit – instead – the moon uses part of this displacement to be the real displacement suitably to the orbit radius – that's why the moon orbital triangle is a cornerstone in the moon motion definition –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Causes To Create A New Rate Of Time In The Solar System Motion
Let's remember the different rates of time argument in following:
- I have discovered many of light motion features in Planet Motion
- Because of that, I have tried to explain how such features are created, then I had to suggest the 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- For detailed investigation I had to suggest the 2nd hypothesis (Light Motion For 1 Second Causes Planet Motion For 1 Day)
- The research 2nd hypothesis suggests that, there are different rate of time in the solar system, then I have concluded the basic rule to create these different rates of time which is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
Then
- I have found that, the original rate of time which is (1 Second Of Light Motion Is Equivalent For 1 Solar Day (86400 seconds) Of Planet Motion) this rate of time is valid always in the solar system motion ….
But
- In the Earth moon orbit, this rate is changed into one more rate of time which is (1 Day Of The Sun Is Equivalent Of A Year (365.25 Days) Of Earth)
i.e.
- The 1st rate of time is found generally in the solar system but the 2nd rate of time is found in the Earth moon orbit – the nest question should be why??
- This is happened because of Venus & Mars Motions Interactive Effect On The Earth Moon Orbit And Motion.. so this paper tries to discover the geometrical mechanism by which this effect is created…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
Uranus Day Period =17.2 Hours
This Value Depends On Pluto Orbital Inclination 17.2 Degrees
i.e.
Pluto Energy is transported to Uranus – This Process proves Energy Transportation through the solar group-
Based on that
Pluto Data (Energy) is seen in Uranus Data (Energy) but with different unit – where units change is one of Energy Transportation Geometrical Features
Why Energy Transportation needs to change the units? To provide the required flexibility for Energy Transportation process
Shortly…
Uranus Day Period (17.2 hours) is resulted directly from Pluto Orbital Inclination (17.2 degrees)
This hypothesis should be a direct application on my theory of Energy Transportation Through the Solar Group – and If we can prove this hypothesis – that will support the theory proves strongly
Why there's No velocity higher than Light Velocity C =300000km/sec?
Because
- The Matter is created from light beams coherence (according to Young Experiment- The Main Hypothesis)
- The Time is created as the Matter Changing measurement
- Our body (matter) is produced by the same method, from this light beams coherence
- Our bodies are connected with specific Light velocity and specific time rate because our bodies are produced by specific Light Beams coherence
What does that mean? ..i.e.
- If there's a light velocity higher than C we can't realize it, why? Because Our Body defines only this specific time which is produced from this specific light
Now we can see much better
- Why we can't understand easily the solar System geometry? Because NOT all data is available for us! And why NOT? Because Our Body Connected Us To Specific Category Of Data…
o So we connected to specific light beam (standard velocity C)
And
o We connected to specific time defined by our body changes
So the Special Theory of Relativity is Correct
No Velocity higher than C is available in our Universe
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion Gerges francis
Paper Claim
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Force Effect On The Earth Moon = 42% Of The Sun Mass Gravity Force Effect On Pluto
- Because the sun gravity keeps Pluto in its orbit, that tells Jupiter force must have an effect on the Earth moon motion
- Based on that, Jupiter gravity is the second force effect on the Earth moon motion
- Such effect can't be performed, neither by Mars because of its very small mass nor by Saturn because of its far distance
- That tells Jupiter Mass Gravity must have a greater effect on Mars motion than its effect on the Earth moon motion, and That's True and because of that (Mars Eccentricity = 0.094) but (The Moon Eccentricity = 0.055), proving that Jupiter gravity effect on Mars so greater than its effect on the Earth moon motion.
Shortly,
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The sun data shows relativistic effects and motions Gerges francis
Abstract
- The Sun Data shows Relativistic Effects.
i.e.
- There's a physical point in the solar group moves with c velocity relative to another physical point in the solar group. and this high velocity causes the relativistic effects which are observed and recorded in this paper
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis shows that, Mars Original Orbital Distance was = 84 million km. but because of the relativistic effects, Mars had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance = 227.9 million km.
- This paper provide analyzed data and explanations to prove these 2 facts which are:
1. There's motion with c velocity inside the solar group
2. Mars immigrated from his original point at orbital distance 84 million km to his new orbital distance 227.9 million km
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History (Part II) Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis…
Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm and Mars has immigrated from it to dwell in the new point with Orbital Distance = 227.9 mkm
i.e.
Mars Was The Next Direct Planet After Mercury – where Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm and Mars orbital distance was 84 mkm
How to prove that?
Mars Daily Motion Data shows a great effect of Mercury on Mars Motion – which can't be explained unless by A Direct Effect Of The Neighbor Planet
How such effect can be found with a great distance?!
Mercury effected on Mars Creation and Motion Data when Mars was its neighbor with orbital distance =84 mkm – So When Mars has immigrated – the planet geometrical structure reserved this effect in its data – accordingly – Mars Motion Data shows clearly Mercury Effect on Mars Motion - which proves that Mars was the direct next neighbor of Mercury
Paper Question
Why Mars motion daily degrees (0.524 deg) = (1/ Mars orbital inclination 1.9 deg.)?
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit CircumferenceGerges francis
The Moon Orbit Data shows A Geometrical Structure more complex than the Current theories can explain … Let's refer to it in following:
- Perigee Radius (R1) = Earth Moon Distance = 363000 km (Earth Nearest Point)
- Eclipse Radius (R2) = Earth Moon Distance = 377000km (Total Solar Eclipse Point)
- Average Radius (R3) = Earth Moon Distance = 384000 km (Registered Value)
- Apogee Radius (R4) =Earth Moon Distance = 406000km (The Most Far Point)
Earth Daily Motion 2.58 mkm = The Moon Orbit Circumference at apogee (R4)..why?
The Data
I. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee Point = The Outer Planets Diameters Total
II. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee Point = The Solar Planets Diameters Total
III. The Distance Between Perigee & Apogee Points = the inner planets Diameters total = Earth Circumference
IV. Earth Moon Distance (At Total Solar Eclipse Radius) = Saturn Circumference.
V. The Solar Planets Diameters Total = Saturn Diameter +2 Jupiter Diameters
The Moon Orbit Main Points: (Perigee - Solar Eclipse – Average- Apogee)
These points are defined based on the following geometrical rules:
1- (1st Rule) "R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1" (Pythagoras Rule)
2- (2nd Rule) "2πRn= (1/Rn+1)" (Reflective Values)
3- (3rd Rule) "(2πRn+1/ 2πRn) =1.0725" (Relativities Effects)
(We should prove these rules in this paper)
The Conclusions
1- The Gravity Force Can't Create The Moon Orbit
2- The Space is A Geometrical Player In The Solar Group Geometry
3- There are relativistic effects in the solar Group
4- The Relativistic effects cause geometrical rules control the general geometrical structure (i.e. the higher velocity creates specific form for the space in which it travels)
1- The Unit Definition Is Relative
that means
Value as – one kilometer - one hour - one degree or one liter…etc- all such values and units are defined based on the observer position and situation
That means
What we see as a time value can work in another place as a distance value
And
What we see as a degree value can work in another place as a distance value
2- The Energy Different Types Depend On This Same Concept.
Why Energy has different types? The energy gives energy whatever its form (oil- wood- electricity – magnetism – nuclear….etc)
The result of all these forms are similar approximately – so why there are different types for the energy?
Because of the observer position and situation
This paper tries to discuss and prove this fact
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure Proves The Following Conclusions:
Primary Conclusions
(1) Solar Group Can't be created neither by Big Bang Theory Nor Sun Gravity Concept.
(2) The Solar Group is created of Only One Energy travels through the group
(3) This one Energy creates planets matters (E=mc2 supports that) and planets orbital distances (because Space = Energy –my hypothesis)
(4) Solar Group can be similar to one train and each planet is a carriage of it.
(5) Solar Group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it
(6) Solar Group can be similar to one building and each planet is a part of it
(7) So, when a planet moves – means - this planet moves as a carriage in one train –all solar planets move together in one general motion
Paper Basic Conclusion:
Energy must be Transported from Jupiter to Earth Moon Orbit
The paper tries to prove this fact
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (III)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
- Jupiter causes to create (2nd) force effects on The Earth Moon Motion
- The gravity interaction between the sun, Jupiter, Earth and the Earth moon masses creates one more force (2nd force) effects on the Earth moon motion
i.e.
- A second force effects on the Earth moon motion, and this second force is created by the sun and Jupiter masses gravity effect on the Earth and its moon motions
- Based on that, there are 2 forces effect on the moon motion, (1st force) is the Earth gravity force and the (2nd force) is a force produced by the sun and Jupiter masses effect on the Earth and its moon motions.
- The second force = 10% of Earth gravity force
- The second force effects on the point (A) far from apogee radius (r= 0.406 mkm) with a distance 43000 km, (the distance between Earth and (A) = 449197 km)
- The second force causes the moon to move an equal displacement (88000km) to the moon displacement done under Earth gravity force daily
i.e.
- Although the forces are not equal but they cause the moon to move 2 equal displacement (88000 km x 2), we see only one displacement by the moon moving in the Earth sky, where the other displacement isn't seen because it's done on the Earth displacement trajectory revolving around the sun..
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
Abstract
Time And Distance Values Can Be Equivalent In Higher Velocity
i.e.
Time & Distance Values Equivalence Is Occurred As A Relativistic Effect.
Briefly ….
When a particle moves with high velocity (near to light velocity), So this particle may suffer from the following effects:
1- Mass Increasing
2- Length Contraction
3- Time Dilation
4- Time & Distance Values Equivalence
Point No. 4 is my conclusion I have reach through The Solar Planets Data Analysis -
This paper tries to prove this fact that
(Time and Distance Values can be equivalent – In Higher Velocity)
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.5 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Another Force Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (III)Gerges francis
Paper Question
-Can the moon orbit regress and the Earth still in its same point in the space If the Earth moon distances after the regression still equal their values before it?
- The paper question tells us that….
- The moon orbit regression is done because of the moon vertical motion and both are done in consistency with a displacement done by Earth vertically for 1 km per solar day…
- I claim that, there are 3 motions done, but only one motion is seen, we have to conclude the 2 rest hidden motions….
o The seen motion is The Moon Orbit Regression
o The 1st hidden motion is the moon vertical motion…that means, the moon in its revolution around The Earth does a vertical motion, and this vertical motion is the reason of the Metonic Cycle (19 sidereal years)
o The 2nd hidden motion is the Earth motion, where the Earth moves daily a vertical displacement = 1 km
- These 3 motions are done in consistency with each other, and depends on each other (this dependency can be seen in a deep analysis for these 3 motions origin)
Paper Objective
- The paper tries to prove the moon vertical motion by using the moon motion data analysis, after this proof , The paper discusses if a vertical displacement of Earth is a necessary requirement for the moon orbit regression, which is done as a result of the moon vertical motion.
Paper 2nd Question
- Why it's necessary to know if the moon has a vertical motion?
- (1st) The moon motion has pauses can't be explained, as we have seen in our tests for (Gerges Equation for the moon orbital motion)… where the moon moves on a solar day a distance = 4000 km (in average) (for example from 384000 km to 388000 km) but we have found that, the moon in perigee & apogee top points stay for many days without change its orbit (for example during 28th, 29th and 30th January 2020, the moon stayed on (404425 km, 405333km, 405111 km)) – how to explain that?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System GeometryGerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Coordinates have 3 Axis –XY Plane Is Controlled By Jupiter Effect – And Z-Axis Is Defined By Uranus Effect
The Hypothesis Explanation:
Uranus Effect
- Uranus effects on the solar system vertically
- Uranus effects on the planets axial tilts by a vertical force –
- Uranus Effect on the planets aims to prevent any overturn motion can be done by any planet around the sun and by that Uranus forces the planets to revolve around the sun in the same direction – by this effect- Uranus unifies the planets to revolve around the sun in the same direction
- Uranus effect is seen on the solar system geometry coordinates on Z-axis
Jupiter Effect
- Jupiter effect horizontally on the solar System Geometry
- Jupiter effect on the planets motions aims to provide the consistency between the planets orbital inclinations to save the planets revolutions around the sun in the same direction
Means
- Because of Jupiter horizontal effect on the solar system geometry– the planets don't collide each other through their revolutions around the sun because Jupiter produce the orbital inclinations consistency between all planets Motions
- Jupiter effect is seen on the solar system geometry coordinates on XY-Plain
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Saturn Effect On The Solar Group Geometry
Saturn shows Clearly The Solar Group Geometrical Structure.
The Basic Hypothesis:
The Solar Group Is One Trajectory Of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Trajectory…
i.e.
The Solar Planets (matter is energy because E=mc2) and their orbital distances (Space is Energy – hypothesis)both are created from the same energy which makes
The solar group as one body and each planet is a member of this same body.
Or
The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the solar group is created depending on the cooperation and integration between the solar planets.
Saturn Effect
Saturn tells how the solar group is created based on the previous vision
i.e.
Saturn tells us which planet is created first and which second and what geometrical rule control this creation process.
Shortly
The solar group is one family, all planets are relatives to each other – but Saturn tells us who's brother to whom and who's uncle, who's parent and who's nephew
Saturn Data tells this fact clearly as the sun …Saturn Is The Solar Group Secret
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Light Effects On Plant Motion By Undefined Force Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-Light Motion Effects On Planet Motion By Undefined Force
The hypothesis Explanation
-The solar system motions can't be explained by Classical Machines Laws!
-Because Light motion effects on planet motion by undefined force, resulting all classical mechanics laws clearly be violated by planets motions.
Example No. (1)
o Jupiter velocity =13.1 km/sec, i.e. Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter, where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference! And
o (Jupiter orbital circumference = Jupiter circumference x 10921)
o Uranus velocity =6.8 km, i.e. Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = 51118 km = Uranus diameter, where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
o (Uranus Pluto distance =Pluto velocity per solar day x 7511)
Example No. (2)
o 13.18 degrees = the moon motion degrees per solar day/ 0.526 degrees (Mars motion degrees per solar day) =25.2 (where Mars axial tilt =25.2 deg)
o (687 days Mars orbital period = 27.3 days the moon orbital period) x 25.2
Example No. (3)
o Light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) = Earth velocity x 10000 But
o 365.25 days (Earth year) x 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) =10000
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity Force)
- Also the 2nd hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon motion basic equation (modified) (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (modified) (Revised)
Abstract
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.6 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt (6.7 degrees) declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.6 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
What does mean 2 rates of time?
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
In this equation there are 2 rates of time
How to create them? By relativistic effects –in the solar group
I have claimed that there's a physical point moves by a velocity =0.9999 C – where c= light known velocity =0.3 mkm/sec
Based on this light velocity length contraction with rate 71 can be created but if the moon orbital inclination 5.1 degrees effect on the result will be 71 x 5.1 = 365.25 days (also Length contraction effect may contract 71 mkm to be seen as 1 mkm)
But if
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) (my previous paper)
That means
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
Example
10921 km (Moon Circumference) x 86400 seconds (Solar Day Period) = 940 mkm (Earth orbital circumference)
(Moon = Earth Moon)
What does this equation tell us?
The equation tells that
If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution in one solar day only – so the moon circumference will equal a distance passed by Earth Motion during 1 second period.
So this equation refers to the possibility of existence more than one rate of time in the solar system – where T1= 1day and T2 = 365.265 days
Paper Hypothesis
-Uranus axial tilt is perpendicular on the moon axial tilt, and this perpendicularity created the moon motion range (Perigee r=0.363 mk & Apogee r=0.406 mk)
Paper Main Idea
- The moon orbital triangle is declined by 1.1 degrees on the horizontal base to save the triangle values from Uranus perpendicularity effect on the moon orbit
- (Uranus axial tilt 97.8 deg – The moon axial tilt 6.7 deg =1.1 deg)
- The value 1.1 degrees is consumed in (0.5 deg "the moon angular diameter") and (0.6 degrees ")
- The value (0.6 degrees) shows Jupiter and Saturn motions effect on Mars motion, but this interaction between the 3 planets motions (Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) depends on the moon angular diameter "0.5 degrees". And because of that, the moon motion data effects and effected greatly by Mars motion… for example
o 687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) x 25.2
o 13.18 deg (the moon motion daily)/ 0.526 deg (Mars motion daily) = 25.2 deg (Mars axial tilt) =
- This interaction of Mars and Moon motions is created because Jupiter and Saturn motions effect on Mars Motion is done based on the moon angular diameter "0.5 degrees", so this both values (0.5 degrees +0.6 degrees = 1.1 degrees) consisted together one result 1.1 degrees which Uranus aimed to create between both axial tilts (Uranus axial tilt and the moon axial tilt).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (V) Gerges francis
Paper Question
How can the moon motion is done in 2 different orbits?
Paper main idea summary
- Uranus axial tilt has an angle (91.1 degrees) with the Earth moon axial tilt
- Uranus creates a triangle with decline (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level and the rest angle (90 degrees) Uranus uses to be perpendicular on the moon orbit
- Uranus basic effect on the moon orbit is done on perigee point –
- Under the triangle Uranus created for the moon orbit, Uranus used 2 parts as stuffing to consume this angle (1.1 degrees) (1st part) is the green rectangle and it's created by Jupiter and Saturn cooperation, it consumes 0.6 degrees. The (2nd) part is the moon itself where the moon diameter consumes an angle = 0.5 degrees
- i.e., Uranus axial tilt angle on the triangle base = 90 degrees, but under the base immediately this same angle will be 90.6 degrees and the moon diameter consumes 0.5 degrees (i.e.) under the moon the angle is 91.1 degrees on the horizontal level which is the moon axial tilt.
- What we need is the angle 90.8 degrees? How to find it?
- Uranus axial tilt penetrates the moon diameter till reach to a diameter =1390 km around the moon center (inside the moon body) – why? because the moon diameter (3475 km) consumes (0.5 degrees) – so the diameter (1390 km) will consume only (0.2 degrees) – so Uranus axial tilt angle will be (90.9 =90.8+0.1)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History (Part II) Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis…
Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm and Mars has immigrated from it to dwell in the new point with Orbital Distance = 227.9 mkm
i.e.
Mars Was The Next Direct Planet After Mercury – where Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm and Mars orbital distance was 84 mkm
How to prove that?
Mars Daily Motion Data shows a great effect of Mercury on Mars Motion – which can't be explained unless by A Direct Effect Of The Neighbor Planet
How such effect can be found with a great distance?!
Mercury effected on Mars Creation and Motion Data when Mars was its neighbor with orbital distance =84 mkm – So When Mars has immigrated – the planet geometrical structure reserved this effect in its data – accordingly – Mars Motion Data shows clearly Mercury Effect on Mars Motion - which proves that Mars was the direct next neighbor of Mercury
Paper Question
Why Mars motion daily degrees (0.524 deg) = (1/ Mars orbital inclination 1.9 deg.)?
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit CircumferenceGerges francis
The Moon Orbit Data shows A Geometrical Structure more complex than the Current theories can explain … Let's refer to it in following:
- Perigee Radius (R1) = Earth Moon Distance = 363000 km (Earth Nearest Point)
- Eclipse Radius (R2) = Earth Moon Distance = 377000km (Total Solar Eclipse Point)
- Average Radius (R3) = Earth Moon Distance = 384000 km (Registered Value)
- Apogee Radius (R4) =Earth Moon Distance = 406000km (The Most Far Point)
Earth Daily Motion 2.58 mkm = The Moon Orbit Circumference at apogee (R4)..why?
The Data
I. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee Point = The Outer Planets Diameters Total
II. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee Point = The Solar Planets Diameters Total
III. The Distance Between Perigee & Apogee Points = the inner planets Diameters total = Earth Circumference
IV. Earth Moon Distance (At Total Solar Eclipse Radius) = Saturn Circumference.
V. The Solar Planets Diameters Total = Saturn Diameter +2 Jupiter Diameters
The Moon Orbit Main Points: (Perigee - Solar Eclipse – Average- Apogee)
These points are defined based on the following geometrical rules:
1- (1st Rule) "R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1" (Pythagoras Rule)
2- (2nd Rule) "2πRn= (1/Rn+1)" (Reflective Values)
3- (3rd Rule) "(2πRn+1/ 2πRn) =1.0725" (Relativities Effects)
(We should prove these rules in this paper)
The Conclusions
1- The Gravity Force Can't Create The Moon Orbit
2- The Space is A Geometrical Player In The Solar Group Geometry
3- There are relativistic effects in the solar Group
4- The Relativistic effects cause geometrical rules control the general geometrical structure (i.e. the higher velocity creates specific form for the space in which it travels)
1- The Unit Definition Is Relative
that means
Value as – one kilometer - one hour - one degree or one liter…etc- all such values and units are defined based on the observer position and situation
That means
What we see as a time value can work in another place as a distance value
And
What we see as a degree value can work in another place as a distance value
2- The Energy Different Types Depend On This Same Concept.
Why Energy has different types? The energy gives energy whatever its form (oil- wood- electricity – magnetism – nuclear….etc)
The result of all these forms are similar approximately – so why there are different types for the energy?
Because of the observer position and situation
This paper tries to discuss and prove this fact
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure Proves The Following Conclusions:
Primary Conclusions
(1) Solar Group Can't be created neither by Big Bang Theory Nor Sun Gravity Concept.
(2) The Solar Group is created of Only One Energy travels through the group
(3) This one Energy creates planets matters (E=mc2 supports that) and planets orbital distances (because Space = Energy –my hypothesis)
(4) Solar Group can be similar to one train and each planet is a carriage of it.
(5) Solar Group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it
(6) Solar Group can be similar to one building and each planet is a part of it
(7) So, when a planet moves – means - this planet moves as a carriage in one train –all solar planets move together in one general motion
Paper Basic Conclusion:
Energy must be Transported from Jupiter to Earth Moon Orbit
The paper tries to prove this fact
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (III)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
- Jupiter causes to create (2nd) force effects on The Earth Moon Motion
- The gravity interaction between the sun, Jupiter, Earth and the Earth moon masses creates one more force (2nd force) effects on the Earth moon motion
i.e.
- A second force effects on the Earth moon motion, and this second force is created by the sun and Jupiter masses gravity effect on the Earth and its moon motions
- Based on that, there are 2 forces effect on the moon motion, (1st force) is the Earth gravity force and the (2nd force) is a force produced by the sun and Jupiter masses effect on the Earth and its moon motions.
- The second force = 10% of Earth gravity force
- The second force effects on the point (A) far from apogee radius (r= 0.406 mkm) with a distance 43000 km, (the distance between Earth and (A) = 449197 km)
- The second force causes the moon to move an equal displacement (88000km) to the moon displacement done under Earth gravity force daily
i.e.
- Although the forces are not equal but they cause the moon to move 2 equal displacement (88000 km x 2), we see only one displacement by the moon moving in the Earth sky, where the other displacement isn't seen because it's done on the Earth displacement trajectory revolving around the sun..
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
Abstract
Time And Distance Values Can Be Equivalent In Higher Velocity
i.e.
Time & Distance Values Equivalence Is Occurred As A Relativistic Effect.
Briefly ….
When a particle moves with high velocity (near to light velocity), So this particle may suffer from the following effects:
1- Mass Increasing
2- Length Contraction
3- Time Dilation
4- Time & Distance Values Equivalence
Point No. 4 is my conclusion I have reach through The Solar Planets Data Analysis -
This paper tries to prove this fact that
(Time and Distance Values can be equivalent – In Higher Velocity)
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.5 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Another Force Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (III)Gerges francis
Paper Question
-Can the moon orbit regress and the Earth still in its same point in the space If the Earth moon distances after the regression still equal their values before it?
- The paper question tells us that….
- The moon orbit regression is done because of the moon vertical motion and both are done in consistency with a displacement done by Earth vertically for 1 km per solar day…
- I claim that, there are 3 motions done, but only one motion is seen, we have to conclude the 2 rest hidden motions….
o The seen motion is The Moon Orbit Regression
o The 1st hidden motion is the moon vertical motion…that means, the moon in its revolution around The Earth does a vertical motion, and this vertical motion is the reason of the Metonic Cycle (19 sidereal years)
o The 2nd hidden motion is the Earth motion, where the Earth moves daily a vertical displacement = 1 km
- These 3 motions are done in consistency with each other, and depends on each other (this dependency can be seen in a deep analysis for these 3 motions origin)
Paper Objective
- The paper tries to prove the moon vertical motion by using the moon motion data analysis, after this proof , The paper discusses if a vertical displacement of Earth is a necessary requirement for the moon orbit regression, which is done as a result of the moon vertical motion.
Paper 2nd Question
- Why it's necessary to know if the moon has a vertical motion?
- (1st) The moon motion has pauses can't be explained, as we have seen in our tests for (Gerges Equation for the moon orbital motion)… where the moon moves on a solar day a distance = 4000 km (in average) (for example from 384000 km to 388000 km) but we have found that, the moon in perigee & apogee top points stay for many days without change its orbit (for example during 28th, 29th and 30th January 2020, the moon stayed on (404425 km, 405333km, 405111 km)) – how to explain that?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System GeometryGerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Coordinates have 3 Axis –XY Plane Is Controlled By Jupiter Effect – And Z-Axis Is Defined By Uranus Effect
The Hypothesis Explanation:
Uranus Effect
- Uranus effects on the solar system vertically
- Uranus effects on the planets axial tilts by a vertical force –
- Uranus Effect on the planets aims to prevent any overturn motion can be done by any planet around the sun and by that Uranus forces the planets to revolve around the sun in the same direction – by this effect- Uranus unifies the planets to revolve around the sun in the same direction
- Uranus effect is seen on the solar system geometry coordinates on Z-axis
Jupiter Effect
- Jupiter effect horizontally on the solar System Geometry
- Jupiter effect on the planets motions aims to provide the consistency between the planets orbital inclinations to save the planets revolutions around the sun in the same direction
Means
- Because of Jupiter horizontal effect on the solar system geometry– the planets don't collide each other through their revolutions around the sun because Jupiter produce the orbital inclinations consistency between all planets Motions
- Jupiter effect is seen on the solar system geometry coordinates on XY-Plain
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Saturn Effect On The Solar Group Geometry
Saturn shows Clearly The Solar Group Geometrical Structure.
The Basic Hypothesis:
The Solar Group Is One Trajectory Of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Trajectory…
i.e.
The Solar Planets (matter is energy because E=mc2) and their orbital distances (Space is Energy – hypothesis)both are created from the same energy which makes
The solar group as one body and each planet is a member of this same body.
Or
The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the solar group is created depending on the cooperation and integration between the solar planets.
Saturn Effect
Saturn tells how the solar group is created based on the previous vision
i.e.
Saturn tells us which planet is created first and which second and what geometrical rule control this creation process.
Shortly
The solar group is one family, all planets are relatives to each other – but Saturn tells us who's brother to whom and who's uncle, who's parent and who's nephew
Saturn Data tells this fact clearly as the sun …Saturn Is The Solar Group Secret
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Light Effects On Plant Motion By Undefined Force Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-Light Motion Effects On Planet Motion By Undefined Force
The hypothesis Explanation
-The solar system motions can't be explained by Classical Machines Laws!
-Because Light motion effects on planet motion by undefined force, resulting all classical mechanics laws clearly be violated by planets motions.
Example No. (1)
o Jupiter velocity =13.1 km/sec, i.e. Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter, where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference! And
o (Jupiter orbital circumference = Jupiter circumference x 10921)
o Uranus velocity =6.8 km, i.e. Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = 51118 km = Uranus diameter, where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
o (Uranus Pluto distance =Pluto velocity per solar day x 7511)
Example No. (2)
o 13.18 degrees = the moon motion degrees per solar day/ 0.526 degrees (Mars motion degrees per solar day) =25.2 (where Mars axial tilt =25.2 deg)
o (687 days Mars orbital period = 27.3 days the moon orbital period) x 25.2
Example No. (3)
o Light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) = Earth velocity x 10000 But
o 365.25 days (Earth year) x 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) =10000
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity Force)
- Also the 2nd hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon motion basic equation (modified) (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (modified) (Revised)
Abstract
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.6 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt (6.7 degrees) declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.6 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
What does mean 2 rates of time?
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
In this equation there are 2 rates of time
How to create them? By relativistic effects –in the solar group
I have claimed that there's a physical point moves by a velocity =0.9999 C – where c= light known velocity =0.3 mkm/sec
Based on this light velocity length contraction with rate 71 can be created but if the moon orbital inclination 5.1 degrees effect on the result will be 71 x 5.1 = 365.25 days (also Length contraction effect may contract 71 mkm to be seen as 1 mkm)
But if
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) (my previous paper)
That means
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
Example
10921 km (Moon Circumference) x 86400 seconds (Solar Day Period) = 940 mkm (Earth orbital circumference)
(Moon = Earth Moon)
What does this equation tell us?
The equation tells that
If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution in one solar day only – so the moon circumference will equal a distance passed by Earth Motion during 1 second period.
So this equation refers to the possibility of existence more than one rate of time in the solar system – where T1= 1day and T2 = 365.265 days
Paper Hypothesis
-Uranus axial tilt is perpendicular on the moon axial tilt, and this perpendicularity created the moon motion range (Perigee r=0.363 mk & Apogee r=0.406 mk)
Paper Main Idea
- The moon orbital triangle is declined by 1.1 degrees on the horizontal base to save the triangle values from Uranus perpendicularity effect on the moon orbit
- (Uranus axial tilt 97.8 deg – The moon axial tilt 6.7 deg =1.1 deg)
- The value 1.1 degrees is consumed in (0.5 deg "the moon angular diameter") and (0.6 degrees ")
- The value (0.6 degrees) shows Jupiter and Saturn motions effect on Mars motion, but this interaction between the 3 planets motions (Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) depends on the moon angular diameter "0.5 degrees". And because of that, the moon motion data effects and effected greatly by Mars motion… for example
o 687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) x 25.2
o 13.18 deg (the moon motion daily)/ 0.526 deg (Mars motion daily) = 25.2 deg (Mars axial tilt) =
- This interaction of Mars and Moon motions is created because Jupiter and Saturn motions effect on Mars Motion is done based on the moon angular diameter "0.5 degrees", so this both values (0.5 degrees +0.6 degrees = 1.1 degrees) consisted together one result 1.1 degrees which Uranus aimed to create between both axial tilts (Uranus axial tilt and the moon axial tilt).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (V) Gerges francis
Paper Question
How can the moon motion is done in 2 different orbits?
Paper main idea summary
- Uranus axial tilt has an angle (91.1 degrees) with the Earth moon axial tilt
- Uranus creates a triangle with decline (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level and the rest angle (90 degrees) Uranus uses to be perpendicular on the moon orbit
- Uranus basic effect on the moon orbit is done on perigee point –
- Under the triangle Uranus created for the moon orbit, Uranus used 2 parts as stuffing to consume this angle (1.1 degrees) (1st part) is the green rectangle and it's created by Jupiter and Saturn cooperation, it consumes 0.6 degrees. The (2nd) part is the moon itself where the moon diameter consumes an angle = 0.5 degrees
- i.e., Uranus axial tilt angle on the triangle base = 90 degrees, but under the base immediately this same angle will be 90.6 degrees and the moon diameter consumes 0.5 degrees (i.e.) under the moon the angle is 91.1 degrees on the horizontal level which is the moon axial tilt.
- What we need is the angle 90.8 degrees? How to find it?
- Uranus axial tilt penetrates the moon diameter till reach to a diameter =1390 km around the moon center (inside the moon body) – why? because the moon diameter (3475 km) consumes (0.5 degrees) – so the diameter (1390 km) will consume only (0.2 degrees) – so Uranus axial tilt angle will be (90.9 =90.8+0.1)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why The Earth Moon Distance = The Planets Diameters Total (III) Gerges francis
Paper Question
Why The Earth Moon Distance (At Apogee Radius) = The Planets Diameters Total?
Because
(1)
The Matter Is Created Based On Its Motion –
That means
The moon daily displacement =88000 km – is the reason based on which– the moon diameter is created to be = 3475 km –
This fact can be proved by analyze Saturn Creation and Motion Data
(Point No. 2 of this paper discusses this question)
(2)
We Still Analyze The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure, Where the moon orbit shows that there's a geometrical design forces the moon to move specific motion and specific displacement daily
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (IV) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The moon motion has 2 orbit which are found in perpendicularity on one another
Paper Idea
- As we have explained in the moon orbital triangle, Uranus axial tilt creates an angle 90.6 degrees above the moon diameter (under the green rectangle)
- But, Uranus orbital inclination =0.8 degrees, so the vertical value of it will be =90 degrees +0.8 degrees = 90.8 degrees – this value is so near to the previous one which is (90.6 degrees) and I try to discover if they can be the same value!
- We know that, the moon angular diameter consumes 0.5 degrees from the original angle between Uranus axial tilt (97.8 degrees) and the moon axial tilt (6.7 degrees) which =91.1 degrees and by consuming (0.5 degrees) the rest is (90.6 degrees) and now we want to make this value = 90.8 degrees! How?
- The moon diameter (3475 km) consumes (0.5 degrees), so what smaller diameter of the moon can consume only (0.2 degrees) to left the rest (90.8 degrees)?!
- (3475 km /5) x2 = 1390 km
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VII) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Uranus effect on the moon orbit causes the period of 1 hour (of a planet motion) to be equivalent to 1 solar day (of another planet motion)
- We still analyze the interesting data (the moon circumference =10921 km)
o Pluto moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Uranus diameter
o Jupiter moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Jupiter diameter
o But
o 51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 6.8 km/sc x 7511 seconds, the equation tells that, Uranus has to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = Uranus diameter (where 7511 km = Pluto circumference) – On The Other Side- Pluto has to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass (by rotation) 7511 km x6.8 = 51118 km (a distance = Uranus diameter)
o 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 13.1 km/sc x 10921 seconds, Jupiter moves 10921 seconds for its diameter and On The Other Side the moon has to rotate around its axis 13.1 times to pass a distance = Jupiter diameter
Paper question
o What geometrical mechanism behind this data?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- The moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2.5986 mkm
- The moon apogee circumference =2.550973 mkm
- The difference 47720 km
- Because the apogee orbit (r= 406000 km) is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, the question is raised that (why the moon apogee orbital circumference doesn't equal its displacements total during 29.53 days?)
- The provided answer told that, because of the moon orbital inclination effect, this answer contains a reference that the moon orbital inclination 5.1 deg is created by an effect of Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 deg…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
-Uranus effects on the Earth moon orbital motion at perigee Point.
The Hypothesis explanation
-The moon orbit is a coordinates on which Uranus and Jupiter cooperate with Earth gravity to produce the moon orbital motion
- Uranus effects on the moon orbit creates the perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm, the point most near to Earth the moon can reach)
- Uranus creates the perigee radius and tries to keep the moon on it, because to save the moon under perigee radius will enable Uranus to use the moon diameter angle (0.5 degrees) to create the difference (1.1 degrees) between the moon orbital triangle and the horizontal level (the horizontal level is the moon axial tilt) by that, Uranus will be perpendicular on the moon orbit but creates an angle =91.1 degrees between Uranus axial tilt and the moon axial tilt
- Shortly, The perigee radius is the point Uranus wanted to create and to save the moon on it.
- Because there's 2nd force effects on the moon orbital motion in addition to Earth gravity, this 2nd force pulls the moon from perigee radius(r=0.363 mkm) to apogee (r=0.406 mkm, the most far point the moon can go)
- Because of that, the perigee radius geometrical structure & data is created by a direct effect of Uranus data
Paper Conclusion
- Planet Day & Rotation Periods Are Defined As Functions Of Its Mass
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Claim
1 Solar Day On The Sun = 365 Solar Days On Earth
- The Earth Moon Orbit regresses 19 Degrees Per A Year
- This Moon Regression causes to create a different rate of time. i.e. the moon regression causes 365 solar days to be used as 1 solar day only which creates 2 different rates of time
- Venus Motion per one solar day causes The Moon orbit regression for one year and by Venus effect on the moon orbit regression the different rates of time are created
- Venus effect on the moon orbit is a result of a general motion done by all solar planets together –
- Means, the moon orbit regression shows an effect of an unified motion done by all planets
- That may answer the old question, why the moon orbit data shows a general effect of all planets – for example
o (Perigee Radius = the outer planets diameters total) (error 1%)
o (Apogee Radius = the solar planets diameters total)
o The Distance between apogee and period (space only) = the inner planets diameters total = Earth Circumference.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The first question in this research was why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? i.e. why (the Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) = (earth orbital distance/ Earth Moon distance)?
The answer was "That's only Pure Coincidence" (No.1)
Then I found another question…
The Earth-Moon Orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) = 2.58 mkm = Earth daily motion… why?
"That's also Pure Coincidence" (No.2)
Then I found the moon orbit geometrical relationships which are:
6. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%)
7. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
8. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
9. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (377000km)
Why the previous relationships are found?
"Surely these are Pure Coincidence" (No.3)
Let's then with more depth, the moon has to move daily a distance = Earth daily motion, otherwise they will be separated from each other.. that means the moon should move daily =2.58 mkm, but we know that the moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) also 2.58mkm ..why?
"We all know this is Pure Coincidence" (No.4)
Then Metonic Cycle question is produced
Why the moon orbit regresses daily 19 degrees? Why the moon rotates Metonic Cycle which Earth doesn't? let's think with some deep vision
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (Synodic Month)
= 20 x 346.6 days (nodal year)
The previous data tells us that, the Earth motion is in harmony with Moon and Moon orbit motions, that's why the three motions finish their cycles in the same time \
Why?
"Just Pure Coincidence" (No.5)
I found we need to find some logical and physical explanation behind all these data, I can't accept any of these as Pure coincidences…
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Paper Question
Why The Moon Orbital Circumference At Apogee Orbit = 2.55 Mkm?
The Question Explanation
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
Paper answer
- The moon uses a geometrical interaction depends on the difference between these 2 distances (2.55 mkm &2.598 mkm) to create the moon orbital inclination5.1 deg.
Paper hypotheses
(1st) There's a 2nd force effects on the moon motion in addition to Earth gravity
(2nd) Uranus Motion effects on the moon orbital motion and cause Metonic Cycle
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon orbit geometrical structure (revised)Gerges francis
The first question in this research was why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? i.e. why (the Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) = (Earth orbital distance/ Earth Moon distance)?
The answer was "That's only Pure Coincidence" (No.1)
Then I found another question…
The Earth-Moon Orbit circumference at apogee radius (r=406000 km) = 2.58 mkm = Earth daily motion… why?
"That's also Pure Coincidence" (No.2)
Then I found the moon orbit geometrical relationships which are:
1. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%)
2. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
3. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
4. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (377000km)
5. Note Please/ Solar Planets Diameters Total= 2 Jupiter diameters + 1 Saturn diameter (i.e. Jupiter diameter = 8 solar planets diameters total)
Why the previous relationships are found?
"Surely these are Pure Coincidence" (No.3)
Let's think more deeply,
The moon has to move daily a distance = Earth daily motion, otherwise The Earth and Moon will be separated from each other.. that means
- The moon should move daily =2.58 mkm,
- We know Earth moves daily = 2.58 mkm
- Also the moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) = 2.58 mkm
Is There any relationship between the three value 2.58 mkm… ?
The answer is "No, this is Pure Coincidence" (No.4)
Then Metonic Cycle question is produced
Why the moon orbit regresses yearly 19 degrees? Why the moon rotates Metonic Cycle which Earth doesn't? let's think more deeply
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
= 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (235 Synodic Months)
= 20 x 346.6 days (20 nodal years)
The previous data tells us that, the Earth motion is in harmony with Moon and Moon orbit motions, that's why the three motions finish their cycles in the same time.
Why? (by the way how The moon orbit regresses alone with the moon? does it occur with any other planet?
"Just Pure Coincidence" (No.5)
Also I found some interesting relationship
Earth Circumference = inner planets diameters total
i.e. diameters of (Mercury + Venus + The moon + Earth + Mars) = Earth Circumference
but
2 Neptune Circumference = Jupiter diameter + Saturn diameter + Uranus diameter
(error 1%)
Also I found
Earth Mass = Mercury Mass + Venus Mass+ Moon Mass + Mars Mass (error 1%)
Neptune Mass= inner Planets masses total + Uranus mass + Pluto Mass (3.3%)
Is there any geometrical reason behind all these relationships?
"Simply these are only Pure coincidences" (No.6)
Is There another Orbit For The Moon Motion? Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis No. (1)
-Another Orbit must be found for the moon motion.
Paper Hypothesis No. (2)
-An interaction is found between Jupiter and the Earth moon motions, this interaction shows that another orbit must be found for the moon motion –
Paper Objective
-The paper tries to prove that, there's an interaction between Jupiter and the moon motion.
-And
-Based on this interaction, Jupiter effect on the moon motion suggests that another orbit is required necessary for the moon orbital motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon orbital motion geometry (revised) (2)Gerges francis
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (2)
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Paper Conclusions
(1st)
Earth Cycle 1461 days is created as a result of the moon orbit regression
(2nd)
Uranus Motion effect on the moon orbital motion and causes to create Metonic Cycle.
(3rd)
A 2nd force effect on the moon orbital motion.
Paper Question
How can the far planets effect on the moon orbital motion spite of the huge distance?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Velocity Is Defined As A Function Of Its Diameter (II) (revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon is created by effect of Uranus and Pluto motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Although the Earth moon is created by Planets collisions But
- The Earth moon data is created by an effect of light motion calculations
- That supports the conclusion that (light motion must be a companying with planet motion and effect on it)
Paper questions
- The paper tries to answer the following question:
o Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days?
o Why Uranus motion distance during (5040 seconds)= Pluto motion distance during 7511 seconds.
Paper conclusion
- Light Motion Is Accompanying With Planet Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar system geometry (part ii) (revised)Georgy Tawdrous
Abstract
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference =Earth Motion distance during 1solar day?
- This question was the first one I have faced in the moon orbital motion- may try to solve it in following….
- Planet motion depends on light motion based on the hypothesis (1 second of light motion causes Planet motion for 1 solar day), this hypothesis creates the 1st rate of time in the solar system which is (1 second of light = 1 day of planet)
- The 1st rate of time dominates any planet motion – but – in the Earth Moon Orbit, this rate is changed by Venus & Mars Motions Effect
- (86400 = 237 x 365), where 237 = (Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period) and 365 =(Earth orbital circumference /the moon orbital circumference)
- Venus & Mars Motions Interaction cause to remove the rate (237) from the previous equation- and because of that (1 day on the sun = 365 days on Earth) and that causes the moon orbital circumference = Earth motion distance daily
But
- The moon circumference shows also this same rate, as we have concluded that from (10921 km the moon circumference x 86400 seconds = 940 mk) This equation tells that, if Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one Solar Day Only, so the moon circumference in this case will equal the Earth motion distance during 1 second…means the rate (1 is equivalent to 365) is seen again in the moon circumference as we have seen it in the moon orbit..!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon? (III)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth Moon is a unique Planet In The Solar System
i.e.
The Earth Moon practices a great effect on the solar system geometry more than any other moon in the solar group.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to prove that –
The Earth Moon Orbit Is Created By A Force has Geometrical Features can't be produced by The Masses Gravity
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Similar to Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VI) (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
The increased availability of biomedical data, particularly in the public domain, offers the opportunity to better understand human health and to develop effective therapeutics for a wide range of unmet medical needs. However, data scientists remain stymied by the fact that data remain hard to find and to productively reuse because data and their metadata i) are wholly inaccessible, ii) are in non-standard or incompatible representations, iii) do not conform to community standards, and iv) have unclear or highly restricted terms and conditions that preclude legitimate reuse. These limitations require a rethink on data can be made machine and AI-ready - the key motivation behind the FAIR Guiding Principles. Concurrently, while recent efforts have explored the use of deep learning to fuse disparate data into predictive models for a wide range of biomedical applications, these models often fail even when the correct answer is already known, and fail to explain individual predictions in terms that data scientists can appreciate. These limitations suggest that new methods to produce practical artificial intelligence are still needed.
In this talk, I will discuss our work in (1) building an integrative knowledge infrastructure to prepare FAIR and "AI-ready" data and services along with (2) neurosymbolic AI methods to improve the quality of predictions and to generate plausible explanations. Attention is given to standards, platforms, and methods to wrangle knowledge into simple, but effective semantic and latent representations, and to make these available into standards-compliant and discoverable interfaces that can be used in model building, validation, and explanation. Our work, and those of others in the field, creates a baseline for building trustworthy and easy to deploy AI models in biomedicine.
Bio
Dr. Michel Dumontier is the Distinguished Professor of Data Science at Maastricht University, founder and executive director of the Institute of Data Science, and co-founder of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. His research explores socio-technological approaches for responsible discovery science, which includes collaborative multi-modal knowledge graphs, privacy-preserving distributed data mining, and AI methods for drug discovery and personalized medicine. His work is supported through the Dutch National Research Agenda, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Horizon Europe, the European Open Science Cloud, the US National Institutes of Health, and a Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network. He is the editor-in-chief for the journal Data Science and is internationally recognized for his contributions in bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and semantic technologies including ontologies and linked data.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VI)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –19th
November 2020
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon motion has 2 orbits
The hypothesis explanation
- The Earth moon is so specific planet in the solar system and so effective in its
general geometry
- Uranus and Neptune effect on the moon orbit creation and cause its regression by
19 degrees yearly
- Uranus and Neptune orbital inclinations are created by the effect on their
interactions in the moon orbit
- Mars orbital inclination is created based on the moon orbit interactions
- The moon orbital motion has 2 orbits both perpendicular on one another
- Venus axial tilt and orbital inclination are created as a result of Uranus
perpendicularity on the moon orbits.
Paper conclusion
- Many of Planets data can be created by their values only if there are 2 orbits for
the moon motion.
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
1- The Moon 2 Orbits Proves Discussion
1-1 The Moon Diameter Analysis
Figure No. (1)
- This figure I have created as a part of the moon orbital triangle
- The figure provides a clear vision for what's happening inside the moon diameter
to create Uranus orbital inclination
- In this figure we use the moon orbital triangle data, where I have inserted this
triangle in the paper end to be our discussion reference –
Let's start our discussion
- We woks basically with the line (BTM L), it's Uranus axial tilt line (97.8 degrees),
- The line KL is the Earth Moon Axial Tilt (6.7 degrees)
- The angle KLM = 91.1 degrees which supposed to be equal the angle in (the moon
center IMT)
- The angle 1.1 degrees is consumed in the moon diameter (3475 km = 0.5 degrees)
and the green rectangle =0.6 degrees (created by Saturn and Jupiter interaction)
- The angle UTB = 90 degrees +0.6 degrees = 90.6 degrees
- We search for an angle =90.8 degrees (Uranus orbital inclination 0.8+90)
- The moon diameter consumes 0.5 degrees, so we will cut the moon great diameter
to a smaller one which consume only 0.2 degree, this small moon r = 695 km..
- So the small moon (its diameter = 695 km x 2= 1390 km) consumes 0.2 deg
- The (Uranus axial tilt line) angle on this small moon surface = 90.9 degrees
- This 90.9 degrees = 90.8 degrees + 0.1 degree
- Now let's try to see how this analysis will wok in following ….
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
Equation No. 1
1.8 deg (Neptune orbital inclination) x 0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination) =1.44 deg2
- 1.44 degrees = the moon orbit regresses degrees monthly
- We have 0.8 degrees in the previous figure, but where's 1.8 degrees? How to find
Neptune orbital inclination in the previous figure,
- Because
- The red line (SB) declines on the horizontal level (KL = the moon axial tilt) with
only 1.1 degrees – so how to create 1.8 degrees in this figure
(Question No. 1)
Equation No. 2
The greater circle r = 1042.5 km (3475 km -1390 km = 2 x 1042.5 km)
Where
51118 km = 6.8 km/sec x 7511 seconds
- Let's remember this beautiful equation …
- Equation no. (2) tells that,
o Uranus needs to move 7511 seconds to pass a distance = its diameter
o Where 7511 km = Pluto circumference….
o On the other side
o Pluto has to rotate around its axis 6.8 times to move a distance = 51118 km=
Uranus diameter,
o but
o Pluto rotates around its axis each 153.3 hours, so 6.8 x 153.3 = 1042.5 h
- This interesting data will be more attractive when we remember Jupiter case
o 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 13.1 km/sec x 10921 km
o Jupiter needs to move 10921 seconds to pass a distance = its diameter
o Where 10921 km = The Earth moon circumference….
o On the other side
o The moon has to rotate around its axis 13.1 times to move a distance
=142984 km= Jupiter diameter,
o but
o the moon rotates around its axis each 27.3 days, so 13.1 x 27.3 = a year
- It's hard to consider both cases as pure coincidences….
- Any way we have found the number 1042.5 inside the moon diameter, and we as
we have seen in 2 examples, to use the distance value as a time period is usual
using in the plants data…!
- How to explain this data
(Question No. 2)
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
Equation No. 3
91.7 degrees = 63.7 degrees x 1.44 degrees
- 63.7 degrees is the sun declination
- 1.44 degrees = the moon orbit regression monthly
- But
- What's this value 91.7 degrees??
-
- In the previous figure, the total decline angle between the moon triangle base (the
red line BS) on the horizontal level (the moon axial tilt) only 1.1 degrees and the
total angle between Uranus axial tilt and the moon axial tilt =97.8- 6.7 =91.1 deg.!
- So
- How to create this number 91.7 degrees? We need 91.1 deg +0.6 deg
- How to create this strange value (97.1 =91.1 deg +0.6 deg)??
(Question No. 3)
Equation No. 4
1.9 degrees = 1.1 degrees + 0.8 degree
- 1.9 degrees = Mars orbital incaution
- 0.8 degree = Uranus orbital incaution
- 1.1 degrees = (91.1 degrees -90 degrees) (i.e. the total decline angle)
i.e.
- If we consume 0.8 degrees from the total decline angle (1.1 degrees) how to add
the same angle (1.1) again to this total?
Also
- In Neptune orbital inclination 1.8 degrees
- We need
- 0.1 degrees works negatively against (1.9 degrees) (on the opposite direction!) so
(1.9 degrees – 0.1 degree = 1.8 degrees)
- That tells w have 2 value of the same total angle (1.1 degrees), and they may be in
opposite to each other!
Equation No. 5
1.44 degrees = 1.9 degrees x 0.378 degree x 2
- 1.44 degrees = the moon orbit regression per month
- 1.9 degrees = Mars orbital inclination
- 0.378 mkm = The Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius
- Equation No. (5) tells us, there's some reason to create an interaction between the
moon orbit regression and Mars motion! can really such interaction be created?
(Question No. 4)
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
Equation No. 6
5.6 degrees = 1.1 degrees x 5.1 degree
- The value 1.1 degrees is the decline angle total
- 5.1 degrees = the moon orbital inclination
- 5.6 degrees = the moon orbital inclination + the moon diameter angle (5.1+0.5)
i.e. the moon orbital inclination is measure above the moon diameter
- Equation No. (6) tells that, the moon orbital inclination (5.1 deg) is produced as a
result of Uranus perpendicularly on the moon orbit and specifically as a result of
the decline total angle (1.1 degrees) in the moon orbital triangle
How to solve the
previous
questions?
A CONCLUSION
THERE'S ONE MORE ORBIT IS FOUND UNDER THE HORIZONTAL
LEVEL (AS SHOWS IN THE FIGURE)
This conclusion can solve the questions
- The value 1.9 degrees can be produced So 1.1 degrees (1st
orbit) +0.8 deg ( 2nd
orbit)
- Also (1.9 deg – 0.1 deg) = 1.8 deg where the value (0.1 deg) effects in opposite
direction to the first one (1.9 deg)
- Also
- The value 91.7 degrees = 63.7 x 1.44 degrees can be easily produced, because the
value 91.1 degrees (1st
orbit) +0.6 degrees (2nd
orbit)
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
1-2 Pluto Effect On The Moon Orbital Triangle
We discuss here the interesting equation No.2
Equation No. 2 (Revision)
The greater circle r = 1042.5 km (3475 km -1390 km = 2 x 1042.5 km)
Let's add more data to extend our discussion
Equation No. 7
(a) 1042.5 km x 2 = 6.01 x 346.6
(b) 8 degrees = 1.9 degrees + 6.1 degrees
(c) 346.6 days (the nodal year) = 8 x 43.3 days but (1042.5 hours = 43.3 days)
How to understand this equation, let's move step by step:
- 1042.5 km = the greater circle radius (R = 1042.5 km) in our figure No. 1
- So the diameter = 1042.5 km x 2 =2085 km
- We remember the story concerning the equation no. (2), that Pluto needs to move
during 1042.5 hours to rotate around its axis 6.8 times…. But (1042.5 h =43.3 day)
- The hours (1042.5) causes to create the days (346.6 days) based on the rate 8
- 8 = 1.9 deg (Mars orbital inclination) + 6.1 degrees
- But we have only 6.01 and how to create 6.1? (6.01 /0.1) =6.1 degrees
- Equation no. (b) tells that, the value (0.1 degree) is owned by Mars and it uses
freely as here, proving that (1.9 deg= 0.1 deg +1.8 deg Neptune orbital inclination)
- What conclusions here?
- Mars and Pluto are 2 players in the nodal year creation (346.6 days)
- Because of that
o (687 days mars orbital inclination + 2 x 3.1) = 2 x 346.6 days
(3.1 degrees = Jupiter Axial Tilt which is used here in days unit)
o 90560 days (Pluto Orbital Period) = 346.6 days x 261.3
o 261.3 x 0.1 = 26.13 = (5.1)2
(5.1 degrees = The moon orbital inclination)
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
Equation No. 8
180.8 degrees = 179.9 degrees +0.9 degrees
- 180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) +3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)
- But
- 179.9 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) +2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination)
- 0.9 degrees is the total decline angle above the moon small diameter (r=695 km)
And
- We know that the green triangle in the figure (mo.1) is created to consume 0.6 by
interaction between Jupiter and Saturn (that proved by the equations 2.5 deg = 0.6
deg +1.9 deg and 1.9 deg = 0.6 deg +1.3 deg)
- So the interaction is done inside the moon body –
- Simply above a radius =695 km, the interaction is done between Venus axial tilt
(177.4 deg) and Saturn orbital incaution (2.5 degrees) =179.9 deg, then add to that
the value 0.9 degrees which is the total decline angle above the small moon
diameter (695 km) – to create the total 180.8 degrees based on which Venus orbital
inclination is created.
- To prove this story… is there any relationship between 695 km and Venus?
Equation No. 9
12104 km (Venus diameter) = 695 km x 17.4
- 17.4 degrees = the inner planets orbital inclination total
(But 17.2 deg Pluto orbital inclination = 17.4 x 0.99)
- 23.6 degrees = the outer planets orbital inclination total
(But 23.4 deg Earth axial tilt = 23.6 x 0.99)
- Equation no. ( 9) tells that there's a strong relationship between Venus diameter
and the small moon radius (695 km)
- But we know that
o Venus circumference x π = Saturn diameter
o (Venus circumference)2
= Saturn orbital distance (1%)
i.e.
- Based on the radius 695 km both planets are interacted and created their data to be
in consistency with this dame distance
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
Let's review The Earth Moon Orbital Triangle because we use it
Figure No. (1) (my figure)
Please Note
(1) SZ = 7665 km ZF = 2414 km
- CZS = 77.8 degrees CZF =102.195 degrees
(2) DY = 3475 km BCY = 28.39 degrees
(3) XB = 16203 km XCB = 10.67
- XCE = 66 degrees CX = 87513 km
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
Let's Review The Moon Orbital Triangle Data
(1st
Point)
- The figure I brought from internet to use in the Explanation -
- We have supposed that the inner circle is Perigee orbit and the
outer circle is apogee orbit – and we have calculated the tangent
AB = 181843 km
- AB = 363686 km (= perigee radius approximately)
- Perigee radius r =0.363 mkm Apogee radius r =0.406 mkm
- Based on that, the triangle (ODB) is a specific Pythagoras triangle (1, 2 and 51/2
)
- i.e. the triangle (ODB) angles are 26.564 degrees and 63.435 degrees
NOTE
- for these 2 angles (26.564 deg and 63.435 deg) we have searched, because these 2
angles will correct many data in the orbital triangle.
(2nd
Point) The Moon Orbital Triangle Data Correction
- EB = Perigee radius = 363000 km
- ED = Apogee radius = 406000 km
- EA= (Jupiter Circumference) =449197 km
- AC = (Saturn diameter) =121620 km (error 1%)
- ES = total solar eclipse radius = 373000 km (error 1%)
(EC = 373000 km = Earth moon distance at T. Solar eclipse, BUT point C is NOT
the moon position in T. solar eclipse, because the distance BC= 86000 km but the
distance between perigee point and total solar eclipse point = 11000 km)
- BS= (the moon Circumference) =10921 km
- BZ = 18586 km BF =21000 km
- BD = DA = 43000 km (BY =46475 km)
- BA = BC = 86000 km
- CS = = 86690 km
- CZ= (the moon daily displacement) =88000 km
- CF= 88526.8 km CD =96150.9 km
THE ANGLES
- The angle between the black and red lines (under E) = 1.1 degrees
- (E) = 13.33 degrees (C)= 121.67 degrees (A) = 45 degrees
- (ECB) = 76.67 degrees (BCA) = 45 degrees
- (BCS = 7.23 deg) (BCZ = 12.195 deg) (BCF = 13.72 deg) (BCD = 26.564 deg)
(ACD = 18.435 deg)
- (BSC = 82.7 deg) (BZC = 77.8 deg) (BFC = 76.82 deg) (BDC = 63.434 deg)
- (CSA =97.23 deg) (CZA =102.195 deg) (CFA= 103.7 deg) (CDA = 116.564 deg)
- (CYA = 118.92 deg) (
- (Uranus axial tilt = 97.8 degrees = FSC 0.6 degrees)
- Angle under (E) = 13.33 degrees 1.1 degrees = 14.43 degrees
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
A Model For The Moon Motion 2 Orbits
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
References
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (II)
https://www.academia.edu/44368860/The_Moon_Motion_Trajectory_Analysis_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-motion-trajectory-analysis-ii
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-motion
or
https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
https://www.academia.edu/44334645/Can_Different_Rates_Of_Time_Be_Found_In_The_Solar_System_Motion_II_
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous