A presentation on 'Publishing in Academic Journals – Tips to help you succeed' presented at the 2015 University of South Africa (Unisa) Authors Workshop organised by Unisa’s College of Graduate Studies and the Unisa Library
Webinar slides from June 8 Library Connect webinar "Researcher profiles and metrics that matter" with: Chris Belter, Bibliometrics Informationist, NIH Library; Andrea Michalek, VP of Research Metrics, Elsevier | Managing Director of Plum Analytics; Ellen Cole, Scholarly Publications Librarian, Learning and Research Services, Northumbria University.
View the webinar at: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=257883
Impact factor (using impact factor to assess the impact of a journal)shri mangalambikai
The impact factor (IF) is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is used to measure the importance or rank of a journal by calculating the times it's articles are cited.
Impact Factors are useful, but they should not be the only consideration when judging quality. Not all journals are tracked in the JCR database and, as a result, do not have impact factors. New journals must wait until they have a record of citations before even being considered for inclusion. The scientific worth of an individual article has nothing to do with the impact factor of a journal.
Quick reference cards for research impact metricsLibrary_Connect
When meeting with students, researchers, deans or department heads, the metrics on these quick reference cards can serve as a jumping off point in conversations about where to publish, adding to researcher profiles, enriching promotion and tenure files, and benchmarking research outputs. The cards were co-developed by librarian Jenny Delasalle and Elsevier's Library Connect program. Learn more and download poster versions as well at: https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/librarian-quick-reference-cards-research-impact-metrics
Lecture on "Altmetrics: An Alternative View-Point to Assess Research Impact" in Five days Advanced Training Programme on Bibliometrics and Research Output Analysis during 15th - 20th June, 2015 at INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar.
Showcasing your Research Impact using BibliometricsCiarán Quinn
Seminar to make academics aware of the bibliometric resources available to them and how to use them to improve their research impact. The session looked at
• What are Bibliometrics and Altmetrics
• Why they are important for you
• How to identify your research impact
and research profile
• How to improve your citations
• How to identify potential research collaborations
Updated 30/01/2015
This session included discussions around the value of bibliometrics for individual performance management/promotion and the REF.
What are bibliometrics?
Journal metrics
Personal metrics
Article level metrics and altmetrics
Webinar slides from June 8 Library Connect webinar "Researcher profiles and metrics that matter" with: Chris Belter, Bibliometrics Informationist, NIH Library; Andrea Michalek, VP of Research Metrics, Elsevier | Managing Director of Plum Analytics; Ellen Cole, Scholarly Publications Librarian, Learning and Research Services, Northumbria University.
View the webinar at: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=257883
Impact factor (using impact factor to assess the impact of a journal)shri mangalambikai
The impact factor (IF) is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is used to measure the importance or rank of a journal by calculating the times it's articles are cited.
Impact Factors are useful, but they should not be the only consideration when judging quality. Not all journals are tracked in the JCR database and, as a result, do not have impact factors. New journals must wait until they have a record of citations before even being considered for inclusion. The scientific worth of an individual article has nothing to do with the impact factor of a journal.
Quick reference cards for research impact metricsLibrary_Connect
When meeting with students, researchers, deans or department heads, the metrics on these quick reference cards can serve as a jumping off point in conversations about where to publish, adding to researcher profiles, enriching promotion and tenure files, and benchmarking research outputs. The cards were co-developed by librarian Jenny Delasalle and Elsevier's Library Connect program. Learn more and download poster versions as well at: https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/librarian-quick-reference-cards-research-impact-metrics
Lecture on "Altmetrics: An Alternative View-Point to Assess Research Impact" in Five days Advanced Training Programme on Bibliometrics and Research Output Analysis during 15th - 20th June, 2015 at INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar.
Showcasing your Research Impact using BibliometricsCiarán Quinn
Seminar to make academics aware of the bibliometric resources available to them and how to use them to improve their research impact. The session looked at
• What are Bibliometrics and Altmetrics
• Why they are important for you
• How to identify your research impact
and research profile
• How to improve your citations
• How to identify potential research collaborations
Updated 30/01/2015
This session included discussions around the value of bibliometrics for individual performance management/promotion and the REF.
What are bibliometrics?
Journal metrics
Personal metrics
Article level metrics and altmetrics
Metrics: what they are and how to use themDavid Jenkins
In this training session we defined metrics (a.k.a. bibliometrics or quantitative research indicators), looked at how researchers are using them to demonstrate their excellence, contrasted three databases that provide metrics, examined certain popular metrics, looked at author profile systems in relation to metrics and discussed the uses and abuses of metrics.
We aimed to equip attendees with the knowledge they need to navigate this part of the research environment and we hope that people left with an understanding of how metrics can be useful and what their srengths and weaknesses are. The session really highlighted how metrics continue to be an important albeit contentious area that sheds a useful light on some of the murkier aspects of research assessment.
Researcher KnowHow: Introduction to bibliometrics with Charles MartinezLivUniLibrary
Charles Martinez delivered a session on Scopus, SciVal and bibliometrics published. It includes an in-depth look at using Scopus and how to track the impact of your research using SciVal. Charles also gave some words of advice about responsible use of metrics.
This presentation was provided by Sarah Koechlein of James Madison University, during the NISO event "From Submission to Publication: Creating and Conveying Quality," held on August 21, 2019.
Presented to members of the Psychology department as part of the New Tricks Seminar series (February 2016)
• journal metrics using WoS and Scopus
• article level metrics in WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar, and from publishers and the differences in each. Touch on altmetrics.
• author metrics in the above. Touch on Publish or Perish
Tanya Williamson, Academic Liaison Librarian
Presentation from a University of York Library workshop on bibliometrics. The session covers how published research outputs are measured at the article, author and journal level; with discussion of the limitations of a bibliometric approach.
Presentation of findings on Bibliometrics; description, methods with examples, advantages and disadvantages. Methods: Citation counts, Publication counts, H-index and Journal Impact Factor (JIF).
Resources used are shared, please use them.
LITA’s Altmetrics and Digital Analytics Interest Group is proud to present Heather Coates, Richard Naples, and Lauren Collister in our second free webinar of the season. Heather will introduce the concept of altmetrics with a quick "Altmetrics 101," Richard will discuss the Smithsonian's implementation of Altmetric, and Lauren will share the University of Pittsburgh's experience with Plum Analytics.
A tool for librarians to select metrics across the research lifecycleLibrary_Connect
These slides introduce a range of research impact metrics. They were presented at the ER&L Conference (April 2017) by Chris James, Product Manager Research Metrics, Elsevier.
Academics must provide evidence to demonstrate the impact and outcomes of their scholarly work. This webinar, presented by librarians, will help faculty explore various forms of documentary evidence to support their case for excellence. Sponsored by the IUPUI Office of Academic Affairs.
Note: The webinar included demonstrations of Web of Science & Scopus, which the slides do not reflect.
Metrics: what they are and how to use themDavid Jenkins
In this training session we defined metrics (a.k.a. bibliometrics or quantitative research indicators), looked at how researchers are using them to demonstrate their excellence, contrasted three databases that provide metrics, examined certain popular metrics, looked at author profile systems in relation to metrics and discussed the uses and abuses of metrics.
We aimed to equip attendees with the knowledge they need to navigate this part of the research environment and we hope that people left with an understanding of how metrics can be useful and what their srengths and weaknesses are. The session really highlighted how metrics continue to be an important albeit contentious area that sheds a useful light on some of the murkier aspects of research assessment.
Researcher KnowHow: Introduction to bibliometrics with Charles MartinezLivUniLibrary
Charles Martinez delivered a session on Scopus, SciVal and bibliometrics published. It includes an in-depth look at using Scopus and how to track the impact of your research using SciVal. Charles also gave some words of advice about responsible use of metrics.
This presentation was provided by Sarah Koechlein of James Madison University, during the NISO event "From Submission to Publication: Creating and Conveying Quality," held on August 21, 2019.
Presented to members of the Psychology department as part of the New Tricks Seminar series (February 2016)
• journal metrics using WoS and Scopus
• article level metrics in WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar, and from publishers and the differences in each. Touch on altmetrics.
• author metrics in the above. Touch on Publish or Perish
Tanya Williamson, Academic Liaison Librarian
Presentation from a University of York Library workshop on bibliometrics. The session covers how published research outputs are measured at the article, author and journal level; with discussion of the limitations of a bibliometric approach.
Presentation of findings on Bibliometrics; description, methods with examples, advantages and disadvantages. Methods: Citation counts, Publication counts, H-index and Journal Impact Factor (JIF).
Resources used are shared, please use them.
LITA’s Altmetrics and Digital Analytics Interest Group is proud to present Heather Coates, Richard Naples, and Lauren Collister in our second free webinar of the season. Heather will introduce the concept of altmetrics with a quick "Altmetrics 101," Richard will discuss the Smithsonian's implementation of Altmetric, and Lauren will share the University of Pittsburgh's experience with Plum Analytics.
A tool for librarians to select metrics across the research lifecycleLibrary_Connect
These slides introduce a range of research impact metrics. They were presented at the ER&L Conference (April 2017) by Chris James, Product Manager Research Metrics, Elsevier.
Academics must provide evidence to demonstrate the impact and outcomes of their scholarly work. This webinar, presented by librarians, will help faculty explore various forms of documentary evidence to support their case for excellence. Sponsored by the IUPUI Office of Academic Affairs.
Note: The webinar included demonstrations of Web of Science & Scopus, which the slides do not reflect.
Identifying and understanding research impact:
A comprehensive suite of metrics embedded throughout Scopus is designed to help facilitate evaluation and provide a better view of your research interests. Whether you are looking for metrics at the journal, article or author level, Scopus combines its sophisticated analytical capabilities with its unbiased and broad content coverage to help you build valuable insights.
Here we look at:
Author level metrics
Journal metrics
Article level metrics
Quality Assurance for Journal GuidanceSmriti Arora
Definitions
What is the need for quality assurance in journals ?
Type of journals
Bibliometric indicators
How to identify credible journals ?
Predatory/cloned journals
Beyond the Journal Impact Factor: Altmetrics; New Ways of Measuring Impactsbeas1
A powerpoint presentation given at Portland State University Library as part of the Library's workshop series for faculty. Download the file to see the notes for each slide.
Early Career Tactics to Increase Scholarly ImpactElaine Lasda
Workshp for Ph.D. candidates, postdocs and faculy on how bilbiometrics, altmetrics, open access, ORCID, and other resources enable greater visibility of research output.
This slide aims to help and guide students on how to start finding literature review through WOS and SCOPUS. The content is excerpted from various sources available from the internet. This is solely meant for education purpose.
Modern research metrics and new models of evaluation have risen high on the academic agenda in the last few years. In this session two UK institutions who have adopted such metrics across their faculty will share their motivations and experiences of doing so, and explain further how they are integrating these data into existing models of review and analysis.
A presentation by Daisy Robert of the South African National Research Foundation (NRF) at the 2015 biennial Taylor & Francis Editors Indaba on 20 March in Midrand
Presentation prepared for the Taylor & Francis Editorial Indabas in Midrand and Cape Town on 20 and 25 March by Taylor & Francis Publisher (Africa office, journals), Mariette Enslin. The presentation was never presented.
Presentation on Peer Review integrity at the Taylor & Francis Editorial Indabas in Midrand and Cape Town on 20 and 24 March 2015 by Janet Remmington, the Taylor & Francis Arts and Humanities journals and Africa office Editorial Director.
A presentation at the Taylor & Francis Editors Indaba in Midrand on 20 March 2015 by Prof Berhanu Abegaz, the Executive Director of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS).
Presentation at the Taylor & Francis Editors Indaba on 24 March 2015 in Cape Town by Dr Abiye Daniel of The Organization for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa (OSSREA)
Angie magabane dhet ro policy presentation at midrand taylor francis indabaTaylor & Francis (Africa)
A presentation by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training about the changes in their scholarly output accreditation policy. Presented at the Taylor & Francis Editors Indaba in Midrand on 20 March 2015.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
9. •What is the readership and usage? The top cited or downloaded papers may be on the
journal website
• What is the journal’s policy on repositories?
• Is it in the Thomson Reuters Citation Index or SCOPUS? Does the journal have an Impact
Factor? Is that an important consideration for your subject area?
• If your work is publicly funded, is your paper required to be ‘Open Access’?
• Should you send an abstract of your paper to the Editor to assess its quality or ‘fit’?
• Look at previous papers to get a feel for what is accepted
• Take note of maximum extent of the submission
(see the Instructions for Authors/Notes for Contributors)
• Follow any submission guidelines; how should you submit your paper?
-Check if submission should be made via an online editorial office, many journals use
ScholarOne Manuscripts or Editorial Manager
• Quote from and reference previous papers published in the journal if relevant. It
demonstrates you have read the journal and contextualises your paper within their
historic contributions to the field.
9
14. •Take care when choosing your title; most readers will access your paper online by
way of a search engine or see it via a content alerting service
• Remember, the title and abstract are the most visible parts of your article and
therefore require care and attention
14
20. • Article level metrics also created a drive towards author metrics such as
the H-Index.
• The h-index is easy to compute
• E.g. one paper has at least one citation, two papers that each
have at least two citations
• The h-index can be applied to any set of papers, for example Google
Scholar has used as it the basis for their journal level metrics.
20
22. Taylor & Francis are pleased to be continuing our partnership with Kudos - a
new service that helps researchers and their institutions/funders to measure,
monitor and maximize the visibility and impact of their published articles.
The Kudos initiative fits very well with T&F’s wider support for authors and
their institutions and so we are excited to have been involved from the early
stages of development.
Kudos builds on three core principles:
1. that readers are increasingly struggling to filter the growing quantity
of published research;
2. that information which supports filtering – such as lay summaries
and impact statements – often exists but is not made public;
3. and that authors are best placed to increase awareness and impact
of their work, but don’t always know how to do this. Kudos provides
a platform for assembling or creating information to help filtering, for
sharing information to drive discovery, and for measuring and
monitoring the effect of both activities.
22
23. As part of the pre-pilot phase (September -December 2013), Kudos surveyed
almost 4,000 authors and the results were compelling:
• 84% thought that more could be done to raise the visibility, impact
and usage of their work
• 80% felt that it was their personal responsibility to increase the levels
of impact, usage and visibility of their work
• 75% of respondents said they would be quite likely, likely or very
likely to use Kudos themselves
22
24. T&F Online provides article level metrics such as Article Views and Citation
Counts
• Article views (the combined .pdf downloads and HTML full-text views of
an article on Taylor & Francis Online; this figure updates every 24-hours)
• Citation counts
•The citation count and list of citations is currently only pulled from
CrossRef and the participating CrossRef members, but we’re
working on expanding the sources from which we pull citation data
to include Scopus and the Web of Science, so that the citation
counts and list of citations are more comprehensive;
•we should see the results of that work on Taylor & Francis Online
early next year
23
25. Altmetrics – new metrics proposed as an alternative to Journal Impact Factor and personal citation indices like the
H-index.
Term “altmetrics” is a generalization of ‘article level metrics’
Altmetrics are often perceived as just a social media measurement tool.
BUT we do need a tool to effectively answer the question: “what I do I need to read?”
Altmetrics act as a post-publication Filter of research
• More than 1.7 Million articles that were published in 2012 are listed on Scopus
• No one can read everything, even within small fields
• Speed
• Altmetrics are very fast
• Social media attention for articles is normally concentrated around the 1st few weeks after
publication.
•There are many types of research and research outputs that serve different roles.
•The metrics we use need to reflect the differing types of output.
•With Altmetrics we also see many different trends emerging per subject area
•Altmetrics Manifesto:
“Altmetrics expand our view of what impact looks like, but also of what’s making the impact”
“This matters because expressions of scholarship are becoming more diverse”
• Different altmetric tools:
• Altmetric
• Impact Story
• Plum Analytic
24
26. Example of article level information on Altmetric.com
The scores are calculated using a proprietary algorithm which is based on a
combination of both the amount and type of mentions, and news articles are
counted differently to tweets.
25
27. Example of detail at article level on altmetric.com
…amusingly about the many kinds of mental illness displayed by characters in
AA Milne’s Winnie the Pooh
26
28. This is an Impact Story report for one authors articles.
Different articles have been picked up in different ways, the highly cited and
highly discussed articles are different.
• Question: Do altmetrics only highlight fashionable articles not the
best in terms of scholarly work?
27
29. • Article level metrics also created a drive towards author metrics such as
the H-Index.
• The h-index is easy to compute
• E.g. one paper has at least one citation, two papers that each
have at least two citations
• The h-index can be applied to any set of papers, for example Google
Scholar has used as it the basis for their journal level metrics.
28
32. • Article level metrics also created a drive towards author metrics such as
the H-Index.
• The h-index is easy to compute
• E.g. one paper has at least one citation, two papers that each
have at least two citations
• The h-index can be applied to any set of papers, for example Google
Scholar has used as it the basis for their journal level metrics.
31