In this webinar, Kevin McDaniel and Reeve Segal from Accessibility.com will walk us through the truth behind the increase in web accessibility lawsuits. Then, Sofia Leiva from 3Play Media will share how video accessibility has been impacted.
2. AGENDA
House keeping
01 What is accessible online
technology?
02 Assistive Technology
03 Legal trends in digital
accessiblity
04 What is video accessibility?
05 Trends in video accessibility
3. Who are we talking about?
15% of the world population lives with some
form of disability
Approximately 87.2% of all households have a
computer
Over 61 million Americans live with some type
of disability
4. What is accessible online technology?
Content is designed and developed
so it is usable for everyone,
regardless of their abilities or type of
technology used to access
information
6. Guidelines and Regulations
WCAG 2.0 | 2.1 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines)
adopted by the Federal government, the state of Florida, California, New York,
Colorado, etc.
requirement 1.2.4: Captions (Live) - Captions are provided for all live audio
content in synchronized media
requirement 1.2.2: Captions (pre-recorded) - Captions are provided for all
prerecorded audio content in synchronized media, except when the media is a
media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such
21st Century Communications Act and Video Accessibility Act
requires internet video originating from TV to be closed captioned
7. Website Accessibility: Title III and Surf-by Lawsuits
Key takeaways
• Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) mandates that public
accommodation must be provided to disabled persons to allow for the “full
and equal enjoyment” of the related privileges, goods, services, advantages
and accommodations.
• While Title III was not originally created to be deal with the internet – it has
been interpreted as the means by which Digital Accessibility Lawsuits are in
legally validated.
• Bill calling for official Web Accessibility Guidelines, the Online Accessibility Act
(H.R. 8478), was introduced but failed to pass before the 116th Congress was
adjourned in 2021
8. Poll
Poll 1
How digital website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020?
• 500+
• 100+
• 2000+
• 3000+
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
• Apparel
• Consumer goods
• Hotel restaurant/leisure
• Entertainment
• Food products
Poll 2
9. 2020 Website Accessibility
Lawsuit Recap
• 2,058 website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020
• Consumer Goods industry was targeted with the most accessibility
lawsuits
• New York had more than half of the all the cases filed nationwide
• Nearly 20% of all website accessibility lawsuits were filed by six
plaintiffs
• 265,000 demand letters were estimated to be sent in 2020
15. July 2021 Website Accessibility Recap
Key takeaways
• 176 website accessibility lawsuits were filed in July
• Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Services and Food, Beverage and
Tobacco were targeted most
• 6 Plaintiffs filed 41% of the month’s website accessibility lawsuits
• Manning Law, APC filed the most complaints in July with 29 lawsuits in
California
• Most lawsuits (47%) were filed in New York with California coming in second
at 45%
• Accessibility.com detected that 52% of litigated websites in July are using
a Third-party accessibility Overlay tool
21. VIDEO IN 2021
91% say the pandemic
has made video more
important to their
brand (Hubspot)
78% of people are
watching videos
online every week
(Adweek)
82% of the world’s
internet traffic will
be video content
by 2022 (Comcast)
23. The Accessibility
Picture
71%
Of people with disabilities leave a
website immediately if it is not
accessible. (Level Access)
87%
Of organizations are captioning
their content. (3Play)
$1,000,000,000,000
In annual disposable income from
people with disabilities is missed
when we don’t make content
accessible. (ROD)
ACCESSIBILITY.
IN 2021.
25. ACCESSIBLE VIDEO
Audio Description
Describe the important visual elements in a video.
Accessible video player
Screen reader and keyboard accessible. Also
supports adding CC and AD.
Captions & Transcripts (& live captioning)
Caption your recording and aim for a 99% accuracy rate.
Avoid using automatic solutions.
26. A11Y LAWS
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Section 504 and Section 508
Americans with Disabilities Act
Title II and Title III
CVAA
21st Century Communications & Video Accessibility Act
FCC
Caption quality standards for broadcast
27. Level A
Transcript for audio-only content;
captions for pre-recorded video;
audio or text alternative for audio
description
Level AA
Captions for live; audio description
for pre-recorded video
WEB CONTENT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES
Level AAA
Sign language track; extended AD;
live transcript for audio-only
Transition to Reeve with Poll – Kevin
Poll 1:
How digital website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020?
500?
100?
2000?
3000?
Poll 2:
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
Apparel
Consumer goods
Hotel restaurant/leisure
Entertainment
Food products
Transition to Reeve with Poll – Kevin
Poll 1:
How digital website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020?
500+
100+
2000+
3000+
Poll 2:
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
Apparel
Consumer goods
Hotel restaurant/leisure
Entertainment
Food products
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
Apparel
Consumer goods
Hotel restaurant/leisure
Entertainment
Food products
Transition to Reeve with Poll – Kevin
Poll 1:
How digital website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020?
500+
100+
2000+
3000+
Poll 2:
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
Apparel
Consumer goods
Hotel restaurant/leisure
Entertainment
Food products
Transition to Reeve with Poll – Kevin
Poll 1:
How digital website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020?
500+
100+
2000+
3000+
Poll 2:
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
Apparel
Consumer goods
Hotel restaurant/leisure
Entertainment
Food products
Transition to Reeve with Poll – Kevin
Poll 1:
How digital website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020?
500+
100+
2000+
3000+
Poll 2:
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
Apparel
Consumer goods
Hotel restaurant/leisure
Entertainment
Food products
Transition to Reeve with Poll – Kevin
Poll 1:
How digital website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020?
500+
100+
2000+
3000+
Poll 2:
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
Apparel
Consumer goods
Hotel restaurant/leisure
Entertainment
Food products
Transition to Reeve with Poll – Kevin
Poll 1:
How digital website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2020?
500+
100+
2000+
3000+
Poll 2:
Which industry do you believe was targeted most in website accessibility lawsuits?
Apparel
Consumer goods
Hotel restaurant/leisure
Entertainment
Food products
Possible poll from Reeve
87%: of are captioning their videos compared to 82% in 2020people
Return on Disability
In order to be accessible, they need closed captions; live captions; audio description. You can also add multilingual subtitles to make content accessible globally.
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was the 1st major accessibility law in US. It has two sections which specifically impact video accessibility.
Section 504 is a broad antidiscrimination law that requires equal access for individuals with disabilities, which applies to federal & federally funded programs.
Section 508 requires federal communications and Information technology to be made accessible. The Section 508 Refresh references web content accessibility guidelines WCAG 2.0. So what’s unique about the Rehabilitation Act is that closed captioning and audio description requirements are written directly into Section 508.
The Americans with Disabilities Act was the 2nd major accessibility law in US. It has two sections that impact video accessibility.
Title II applies to public entities.
Title III applies to places of public accommodation, including private organizations that provide a public accommodation, so a doctors office, a library, a hotel, a restaurant, and many more places.
The context of a place of public accommodation has been tried in many lawsuits in regards to how it impacts internet-only businesses, and in several cases Title III has been extended to the online spaces. For example, There were suits against Netflix both in regards to closed captioning and audio description, and in both cases the outcome was that Netflix had to provide accurate captions for their streaming shows and audio description for their Netflix originals.
The third major accessibility law in the US is the 21st Century Communications & Video Accessibility Act, or the CVAA.
For caption requirements, the CVAA applies specifically to online video that has previously aired on television. Any online video that previously appeared on television with captions has to be captioned when it goes online, including video clips & trailers. As for AD, the CVAA is phasing in audio description requirements by 2020.
One other thing to know of are the standards that should be met to mitigate the risk of legal action.
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, or WCAG 2.0, are the international standards and best practices for web accessibility. It’s important to note that there is a WCAG 2.1, but for the time being, WCAG 2.0 is currently what’s referenced in lawsuits and legal recommendations.
WCAG is the international set of guidelines helping to make digital content accessible for all users, specifically, users with disabilities. It outlines best practices for making web content universally perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust.
So, WCAG has three levels of compliance
Level A is easiest to maintain
Level AA is what most people are aiming for, this is the mid-level of standards.
Level AAA is most comprehensive, highest accessibility standard.
Most laws and lawsuits mention WCAG 2.0 compliance. So for now, that’s what is legally required. Only if a law explicitly states that web developers have to adapt to the newest WCAG version do they need to make their content WCAG 2.1 complaint. The W3C does suggest that any new websites should follow WCAG 2.1 guidelines since they are more inclusive and mobile friendly.
To be compliant with WCAG, you are required to caption pre-recorded video for Level A compliance, and caption live video for Level AA compliance.
FCC accuracy, synchronicity, completeness, placement
WCAG is the international set of guidelines helping to make digital content accessible for all users, specifically, users with disabilities. It outlines best practices for making web content universally perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust.
So, WCAG has three levels of compliance
Level A is easiest to maintain
Level AA is what most people are aiming for, this is the mid-level of standards.
Level AAA is most comprehensive, highest accessibility standard.
Most laws and lawsuits mention WCAG 2.0 compliance. So for now, that’s what is legally required. Only if a law explicitly states that web developers have to adapt to the newest WCAG version do they need to make their content WCAG 2.1 complaint. The W3C does suggest that any new websites should follow WCAG 2.1 guidelines since they are more inclusive and mobile friendly.
To be compliant with WCAG, you are required to caption pre-recorded video for Level A compliance, and caption live video for Level AA compliance.
But, when you care about brand, caption quality matters. Here’s an example of automatic captions on a Jet Blue video.
When it comes to captioning quality, it’s important to follow best practices. The industry standard for spelling is a 99% accuracy. 99% accuracy, though close to perfection, means there is still a 1% chance of error. In a 10-minute file of 1,500 words, this leniency allows for 15 errors total. Only by human, no 100% accuracy
DOJ In the case of video files, to overlay or externally embed synchronized visual text for speech and, consistent with WCAG 2.1 AA, provide nondialogue audio information needed to understand the program content, including sound effects, music, laughter, speaker identification, and location on a digital media file at an accuracy rate equal to that offered by a vendor captioning service such as 3PlayMedia and in a manner consistent with industry standards regarding synchronicity, completeness, and proper placement;
MIT lawsuit said auto aren’t’ enoughhttps://www.3playmedia.com/blog/harvard-settlement-3play-media-caption-quality/