Training on Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) and Local Technical Agroclimatic Comittees (MTA / LTAC) to the DeRISK project team.
February 11 -19 2020, CIAT Hanoi, Vietnam
Call In girls Connaught Place (DELHI)⇛9711147426🔝Delhi NCR
Training on Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) and Local Technical Agroclimatic Comittes (MTA / LTAC)
1. Training on PICSA
& LTACs (MTA)
Feb 10, 2020 – Hanoi, VNM
Carlos Navarro-Racines
P. Imbach, D. Giraldo, J. Ramírez, D. Martinez, et al
DeRISK Southeast Asia – Team Training
c.e.navarro@cgiar.org _cenavarro carlitosunal
2. Introduction to CS
for Agriculture
Feb 10, 2020 – Hanoi, VNM
Carlos Navarro-Racines
P. Imbach, D. Giraldo, H.Dorado,
J. Ramírez, D. Martinez, et al
PICSA/LTACs (MTA)
c.e.navarro@cgiar.org _cenavarro carlitosunal
3. Why climate smart decisions?
________________________________________
[2] Total crop yield variability explained due to climate variability over the last three decades
(Ray et al., 2015)
[2]
Context
• Climate drives ~ 32-39% of productivity
• Our systems are sensitive to climate, not resilient to that.
4. Decision making in a risky environment
Cultivar selection
Soil preparation
Seedtime
Irrigation quantity
Invest in inputs
Harvest date
Climate variability makes these
decisions difficult
Farmers must make climate sensitive decisions before the start of the growing
season.
Context
6. Climate services
Production - Translation - Transfer - Use
________________________________________
[3] Climate Services Partnership
[3]
= Informed climate decision making
CS
7. What makes an effective climate service?
• A climate service
should be useful to
next-users – a
product that informs
decision-making
• Tall et al. (2013)
describe 5 factors
important for
effective climate
services provision:
8. Policies to scale-out
and implement the
Regional CRM
system
Integration at the regional scale
Policies to integrate climate
services into decision making
(e.g. scaling LTACs, sustaining
and scaling FSDSS)
Integration at the national scale
POLICY
PRACTICE
Integration at local level
Institutional changes and
local policies to enable
establishment of climate
services
Data, information and knowledge for climate risk management
9. A conceptual system for Asia
ASEAN Climate Outlook Forum
http://asmc.asean.org/wp-
content/uploads/2019/12/ASEANCOF-13-
OutlookBulletin_DJF2019-20_Final.pdf
Cascade flow
MetServices
Ag. Ministry
Local
Associations
Farmers
15. Capacity building and co-design
________________________________________
[3] Esquivel et al. (2018). Climate Services. doi: 10.1016/j.cliser.2018.09.001
[3]
Key 2
NextGen – AcToday project
16. Agro-Climate Forecasts
• They combine agricultural and climate information, and then provide
adapted recommendations for agriculture.
"This weather is so
strange, I don't know what
variety to sow "
Response of some varieties to
a forecast
Key 2
Yield of F2000 for planting
between Oct – Nov 2017 (Lorica)
17. Agro-climatic Information Interface for Colombia
• MinAgricultura and CCAFS initiative
• With FEDEARROZ, Fenalce, IDEAM,
Federación Nacional de Cafeteros
de Colombia
• Used by rice and maize farmer
organizations and reaching
thousands of farmers
21. Data Collection – MasAgro
Total of 4595 harvest events
Information period : 2012 - 2018
Maize temporal system
22. What does affect the yield?
Identify factors or combination of factors that drives to a high or low productions
f ( C , S , M ) = Y
+ + =
Climate Soil Agronomic practices Productivity
23. Random Forest, Ranking of variable importance explaining yield variations
Explanation of the yield variation in Chiapas: 74.7%
About 60.000 seds by HA An optimal measure of 180 kg/ha of N
At least 30% rainy days
A diurnal range < 11.5OC
24. Varieties with high yield potential
Hibrid varieties: P4063W y RW4000 high potential in yield
From the local varieties: BAAQUIL W6, TUXPENO
25. The potential of the predictive model together with the climate forecast
Near farms to the station
Forecast with 100 simulations
93 harvest
cycles
10 km
f ( C , S , M ) = Y
Variedad Frecuencia
P4082W 20
DEKALB 390 13
OTRA (ESPECIFIQUE) 13
DEKALB 7500 7
DEKALB 380 6
P30F32 6
Otras 28
28. 3. Crop
modelling
2. Data
driven
agronomy
1. Assess
local
information
needs
Farmer advisory services
in LAM
Connect to
seasonal and
weather forecasts
Participatory and
digital platforms
for farmer
advisory
32. INTER-INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT
“The MTAs, allow to generate spaces of
discussion between actors for the
management of local agroclimatic
information, in order to identify the best
practices of adaptation to climatic
phenomena, which are transferred to local
technicians and farmers through the Local
Agroclimatic Bulletin”
Mesas Técnicas Agroclimáticas (MTA)
Local Technical Agroclimatic Comitees (LTAC)
Key 3
33.
34. Local Technical Agro-Climatic Committees
• Empowering institutions such as farmer organizations, the private sector,
academia, international NGOs and governmental organizations to co-
produce forecast-based agronomic recommendations using LTACs.
• Strengthening new capacity related to the participatory generation,
provision, interpretation and use of forecast-based recommendations for
adaptation to climate variability.
Key 3
35. Local Technical Agroclimatic Comitees (MTA)
Lidera y financia MADR, coordina FAO. IDEAM
suministra información climática Nacional y los
equipo de agro-climatología de los gremios en las
MTAs locales. Reuniones y boletines mensuales.
Acuerdo de voluntades.
Lidera y financia SAG. COPECO suministra información
climática. Reuniones y boletines 3 veces al año.
Coordinadores locales en cada mesa. Acuerdos de
formalización y estatutos por cada mesa.
Lidera la mesa Cafenica, Heifer, CIAT.
Lidera la Universidad publica CUNORI, Anacafé,
CDRO, MAGA-PMA, Helvetas e INSIVUMEH
COLOMBIA (10 MTAs)
HONDURAS (7 MTAs)
NICARAGUA (1 MTAs)
GUATEMALA (9 MTAs)
Lidera Ministerio de Agricultura
PARAGUAY (2 MTAs) & CHILE (1 MTAs)
Lidera Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
PANAMÁ (5 MTAs)
Lidera Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería
EL SALVADOR (1 MTAs)
Lidera Secretaría de Chiapas
MÉXICO (1 MTAs)
37. How to make climate information useful for farmers?
[5]
________________________________________
[4] Dorward P, Clarkson G, Stern R. 2017. Servicios Integrados Participativos de Clima para la Agricultura (PICSA): Manual de campo hdl.handle.net/10568/80548
[4]
Key 3
38. PICSA in LAM
• Participatory Integrated Climate
Services for Agriculture
developed by the University of
Reading
• Guatemala, Honduras,
Colombia, Nicaragua
• Opportunity for direct
engagement with farmers for
the delivery and use of agro-
climatic information from LTACs
in Latin America
Key 3
40. Agroclimatic calendars of main productivity actities: maize, beans,
livestock, achiote, cocoa.
Plotting precipitation data perception versus
registered data in a weather station
How to put agroclimatic information in the hands of farmers? Key 3
44. ¡Thank you!
Contact
Carlos Navarro-Racines
Coordinador AgroClimas Fase II
c.e.navarro@cgiar.org
Dr. Julian Ramirez-Villegas
Científico de Impactos de Clima
j.r.villegas@cgiar.org
Dr. Steven D. Prager
Científico de Modelación Integrada
s.prager@cgiar.org
Editor's Notes
CIAT-CCAFS
CIAT-CCAFS
Context
It is very important to understand that climate drives at least the thirty % of the productivity in the field.
In Asia countries, e.g. Laos we have 40-50% of affectations of climate in agriculture.
Our agricultural systems are sensitive to climate, but are not resilient to him.
This represent a big challenge for the farmers, who depend on the environmental conditions for their livelihoods.
In general farmers have to take decisions before the growing season starts.
Decisions like…
The truth is that climate variability makes these decision difficult.
It’s not enough that farmers take decisions based on the conditions of the last year, because each year is different.
If they can understand the climate variability, they can take better decisions.
Fertilizer examuch rain means that the fertilizer will be washed away. Too little rain memple: Deciding when to apply fertilizer requires consideration for when the next rains will come. Too ans that the fertilizer won’t be fully utilized by the plants.
To meet that we have to solve a main issue.
There is a gap between the information produced by the met services and the local farmers.
With understandable and contextualized information, farmers can take better decisions.
The solution is to build climate services for agriculture.
CS is not only produce information. It is more a process that involved the production, translation, transfer and use climate information.
This works at different levels and areas.
The key aspect of this is that users have to be able to make decisions using the information delivered to them
In Central America, we are trying to implement a system like that.
The forecast information comes to the region through the Climate Outlook Forum with the participation of all climate services of the different countries.
Then this information goes down to the national level.
And finally the information goes down to the local actors.
The system also works is two ways, because we try to understand the information need at local level and then scale this need to the upper levels.
Our work comprises three knowledge flows.
We evaluate the needs of the different users at a different levels.
In this step we analyze the agro-climatic information available, who offer it and who request this information.
Then we map the actors to understand which actors are linked and which of them are not receiving the climate information products.
So then we can easily promote the links between supply and demand and we understand better the information flows.
Which are the actors?
So we can understand what is the real flux of the information, and who is connected with who
e.g. In Colombia IDEAM (met service) it is not connected with key actors. `
Also we can understand which actors needs strengthening
Adicionalmente es importante definir el alcance geográfico de la MTA.
Mediante un mapa del país o departamento de estudio, y con ayuda de los participantes, se identifica la zona donde trabaja cada institución y los principales cultivos o actividades.
To that, a focus of our work is to improve the climate forecast capacity.
This is possible in a collaborative framework with met services and other institutions like the IRI.
A new generation of climate forecast allows to know what are the probabilities of exceed or deficit of some climate thresholds relevant for agriculture.
This is being implemented in Colombia, Guatemala, Chile as pilots.
Then with better predictions we can combine the climate forcast with crop modelling.
With this combination we can see the responses of some crops and varieties to the climate forecasts.
La agricultura tradicionalmente ha sido investigada en el contexto de datos experimentales.
Si le damos valor a los datos, observacionales, tales como lo que provienen directamente de fincas podemos tener algunos indicios de lo que afecta a los sistemas productivos
- Esto debido a que cada fina se altera
A final slide showing one major project impact in 2014. We saved many rice farmers from crop failure.
We work toghether with institutions at different levels, but at the end of the day we have to leave ant the institutions remain strengthened, and continues the work.
We work toghether with institutions at different levels, but at the end of the day we have to leave ant the institutions remain strengthened, and continues the work.
One mechanism that we use is the LTACs.
These are spaces of discussion between different actors in a territory, including: government people, ministries, farmers, people from universities, national associations, reserachers.
This allows identify the best practices of adaptation to climatic phenomena, which are transferred to local technicians and farmers through the Local Agroclimatic Bulletin.
Recommendations related to: how the crops will be affected, what to sow, when to sow, what are economic impacts of these measures?
At present we have more that 30 LTACs in 8 countries of LAM.
We are aiming to scaling up and strentening the regional capactities.
We understand that a share information is not enough to make better decisions.
We also need other mechanism to that, and we use for example Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (developed by the University of Reading)
This allow us to reach directly the farmers for the delivery and use of agro-climatic information from LTACs in Latin America
As a conclusion a good CS for agriculture involves.