9599632723 Top Call Girls in Delhi at your Door Step Available 24x7 Delhi
TOWARDS INDUSTRY 4.0
1. OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
TOWARDS INDUSTRY 4.0
Challenges of ERP Systems For
SMEs
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
4th International
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CONFERENCE
17-20 October, 2017
Gülay EKREN
Sinop University
Alptekin ERKOLLAR
Sakarya University
Birgit OBERER
Sakarya University
2. 2
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERCo-workers
Prof. Dr. Alptekin ERKOLLAR
Sakarya University, TURKEY
Faculty of Management, Department of Management Information
Systems
erkollar@sakarya.edu.tr
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Birgit OBERER
Sakarya University, TURKEY
Faculty of Management, Department of Management Information
Systems
oberer@sakarya.edu.tr
Gülay EKREN
Sinop University, TURKEY
Departmant of Computer Technologies, Vocational School of Ayancık
gekren@sinop.edu.tr
3. 3
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
• The challenges and possible solutions for ERP systems
of SMEs under the vision of Industry 4.0 are presented
by reviewing literature.
• Then the identified challenges and solutions are
organized in terms of four different phases of an ERP
system as
• system preparation & design,
• system installation & implementation,
• system adaption,
• system operations & maintenance.
INTRODUCTION
In this study
4. 4
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Scope
• Industry 4.0
• Challenges Faced by ERP Systems for SMEs
• The specific phases of a typical ERP system
• Possible challenges and solutions according to identified
phases of an ERP system
INTRODUCTION
5. 5
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
• High-Tech Strategy 2020 Action Plan 2011
INTRODUCTION
Industry 4.0
6. 6
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERCHALLENGES FACED BY ERP SYSTEMS FOR SMEs
• Common characteristics of a full functioning ERP
system
• using a centralized database,
• variety of integrated modules,
• scalability in line with the size of the organization,
• and providing user customization.
7. 7
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERCHALLENGES FACED BY ERP SYSTEMS FOR SMEs
• Like ERPs, SMEs have also common characteristics
• fewer employees,
• less order or customers,
• low revenues.
8. 8
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERCHALLENGES FACED BY ERP SYSTEMS FOR SMEs
• What is the challenges as well as solutions faced by
ERP systems for SMEs in the vision of Industry 4.0?
• Lack of unified standards and protocols
• Lack of using business intelligence capabilities of ERP
systems
• ERP as a huge investment for companies
• Complexity of ERP systems
• Changes and uncertainty during ERP system
implementation
9. 9
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Lack of unified standards and protocols
• Unified global communication standards are required
• ERP systems have not got a standard interface
• the usage of web standards in collaboration with
automation systems or CPS must be considered
10. 10
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Lack of using business intelligence capabilities of
ERP systems
• From ERP I to ERP II
• Business intelligence capabilities offered by new ERP
systems
• data integration,
• controlling activities,
• flexible decision making
11. 11
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER ERP as a huge investment for companies
• ERP systems often requires high investments, and
corporate time and resources (i.e. infrastructure,
qualified staff).
• costly licenses (for both server and web)
• high installation costs
• the cost and time required for training staff
• Major players: SAP, Oracle Applications, Microsoft
Dynamics, the SAGE group, and Infor Global Solutions.
• Open source ERP systems as an alternative for SMEs
• Return on investment (ROI) of ERP systems are
considered to be invaluable for SMEs.
12. 12
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Complexity of ERP systems
• ERP systems are highly complex business information
systems
• End-users usually need more time
• The technical level of ERP systems must be considered
• ERP architecture in total,
• ERP customizing issues for interface to production line
Complexity
for SMEs
Infrastructure
resource
planning
Education about ERP
systems and training
facilities
Human
resource
planning Top management
commitment
Right people for
the
implementation
13. 13
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Changes and uncertainty during ERP system
implementation
• Creating a risk management schedule can be a solution
• Effective communication can be a solution to explain
changes
Uncertainties
of SMEs
No knowledge on
whether the required
budget is secured
Inappropriate
software selection
Inexperienced project
leaders Unclear role and
responsibility for
vendor and internal
staff
Poor teamwork,
poor project
planning
Non-committed
project partners
False software
configuration or
system integration
14. 14
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERTHE SPECIFIC PHASES OF AN ERP SYSTEM
• Define
specifications, and
objectives
• Select ERP
vendors and
software packages
• Establish contacts
with consulting
firms
• Elaborate required
budget
• Define relevant
standards and
protocols
• prototyping
• the installation of
ERP modules
• testing and final
validation of the
prototype
• Appropriate
testing for
modules
• integration tests
for inter-modules
• Operational
starting
• Including BPR
• Users’
understanding
and assimilation
of the new
system
• define key users
• customers’ and
suppliers’
demands are
taken into
account
• BPR pushes
radical change
• Improve
processes
and flows in
areas such
as sales,
purchasing,
accounting,
planning,
controlling,
supplying etc.
• Control the
company’s
operational
activities
15. 15
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Possible challenges and available solutions for ERP
systems
System
preparation
& design
System
installation &
implementation
System
adaption
System
operations &
maintenance
16. 16
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Possible challenges and available solutions for ERP
systems
System
preparation
& design
System
installation &
implementation
System
adaption
System
operations &
maintenance
17. 17
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Possible challenges and available solutions for ERP
systems
System
preparation
& design
System
installation &
implementation
System
adaption
System
operations &
maintenance
18. 18
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Possible challenges and available solutions for ERP
systems
System
preparation
& design
System
installation &
implementation
System
adaption
System
operations &
maintenance
19. 19
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
• Industry 4.0 will not only strengthen companies’
competitive position, but also drive solutions to both
global and national challenges (Wan & Zhou, 2015;
Deshmukh et al., 2015).
• To address this, a set of challenges and available
solutions of ERP systems in the face of SMEs presented
in this study.
• In addition, with regards to the possible solutions
presented here, an ERP system might be tailored to the
requirements of SMEs to meet their business processes.
In Closing
20. 20
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
• A set of suggestions in the case of SMEs as follows:
• ERP systems must be adapted to the requirements of SMEs,
• Financial constraints play a major role in the usage ERP
systems for SMEs, thus there is an urgent need for flexible
pricing policies,
• Open source ERP systems may be an alternative solution for
customization as well as reduction of high initial costs for setup
and support,
• End-users of ERP systems in SMEs should be trained to gain
more experience and competence as well as to handle new
system and reduce complexity.
• The functionality of the ERP systems must be in smaller size,
less complex as well as having special features in order to
fit common characteristics of SMEs,
• ERP software usually forces a rigid structure, but it is required
to be more flexible for SMEs.
In Closing
21. 21
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERReferences
Antoniadis, I., Tsiakiris, T., & Tsopogloy, S. (2015). Business Intelligence during times of crisis: Adoption and usage of ERP systems
by SMEs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175, 299-307.
Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2004). ERP implementation factors: A comparison of managerial and end-user perspectives. Business
Process Management Journal, 10(2), 171-183.
Bagheri, B., Yang, S., Kao, H. A., & Lee, J. (2015). Cyber-physical Systems Architecture for Self-Aware Machines in Industry 4.0
Environment. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 1622-1627.
Berchet, C., & Habchi, G. (2005). The implementation and deployment of an ERP system: An industrial case study. Computers in
Industry, 56(6), 588-605.
de Castro Silva, S. L. F., & de Oliveira, S. B. (2015). Planning and Scope Definition to Implement ERP: The Case Study of Federal
Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ). Procedia Computer Science, 64, 196-203.
Deshmukh, P. D., Thampi, G. T., & Kalamkar, V. R. (2015). Investigation of quality benefits of ERP implementation in Indian
SMEs. Procedia Computer Science, 49, 220-228.
Faller, C., & Feldmüller, D. (2015). Industry 4.0 learning factory for regional SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 32, 88-91.
Fougatsaro, V. (2009). A study of open source ERP systems.
Gilchrist, A. (2016). Introducing Industry 4.0. In Industry 4.0 (pp. 195-215). Apress.
Haddara, M., & Zach, O. (2012). ERP systems in SMEs: An extended literature review. International Journal of Information
Science, 2(6), 106-116.
Haddara, M., & Elragal, A. (2015). The Readiness of ERP Systems for the Factory of the Future. Procedia Computer Science, 64,
721-728.
Hong, K. K., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information &
Management, 40(1), 25-40.
Hong, S. G., Hong, S. G., Siau, K., Siau, K., Kim, J. W., & Kim, J. W. (2016). The impact of ISP, BPR, and customization on ERP
performance in manufacturing SMEs of Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 39-54.
Industrie 4.0 Working Group. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final report, April.
Kolberg, D., & Zühlke, D. (2015). Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 1870-1875.
Law, C. C., Chen, C. C., & Wu, B. J. (2010). Managing the full ERP life-cycle: Considerations of maintenance and support
requirements and IT governance practice as integral elements of the formula for successful ERP adoption. Computers in
Industry, 61(3), 297-308.
22. 22
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERReferences
Loh, T. C., & Koh, S. C. L. (2004). Critical elements for a successful enterprise resource planning implementation in small-and
medium-sized enterprises. International journal of production research, 42(17), 3433-3455.
Majstorovic, V., Macuzic, J., Sibalija, T., & Zivkovic, S. (2015). cyber-physical Manufacturing Systems-manufacturing Metrology
Aspects. Proceedings in Manufacturing Systems, 10(1), 9.
Mittelstädt, V., Brauner, P., Blum, M., & Ziefle, M. (2015). On the Visual Design of ERP Systems The–Role of Information Complexity,
Presentation and Human Factors. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 448-455.
Olsen, K. A., & Saetre, P. (2007). ERP for SMEs–is proprietary software an alternative?. Business Process Management
Journal, 13(3), 379-389.
Posada, J., Toro, C., Barandiaran, I., Oyarzun, D., Stricker, D., de Amicis, R., ... & Vallarino, I. (2015). Visual computing as a key
enabling technology for industrie 4.0 and industrial internet. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 35(2), 26-40.
Rajnoha, R., Kádárová, J., Sujová, A., & Kádár, G. (2014). Business information systems: research study and methodological
proposals for ERP implementation process improvement. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 109, 165-170.
Raymond, L., & Uwizeyemungu, S. (2007). A profile of ERP adoption in manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Enterprise Information
Management, 20(4), 487-502.
Sadrzadehrafiei, S., Chofreh, A. G., Hosseini, N. K., & Sulaiman, R. (2013). The benefits of enterprise resource planning (ERP)
system implementation in dry food packaging industry. Procedia Technology, 11, 220-226.
Schuh, G., Gartzen, T., Rodenhauser, T., & Marks, A. (2015). Promoting work-based learning through industry 4.0. Procedia
CIRP, 32, 82-87.
Serrano, N., & Sarriei, J. M. (2006). Open source software ERPs: a new alternative for an old need. IEEE software, 23(3), 94-97.
Shanks, G., Parr, A., Hu, B., Corbitt, B., Thanasankit, T., & Seddon, P. (2000). Differences in critical success factors in ERP systems
implementation in Australia and China: a cultural analysis. ECIS 2000 Proceedings, 53.
Venkatraman, S., & Fahd, K. (2016). Challenges and Success Factors of ERP Systems in Australian SMEs. Systems, 4(2), 20.
Wan, J., Cai, H., & Zhou, K. (2015). Industrie 4.0: enabling technologies. In Intelligent Computing and Internet of Things (ICIT), 2014
International Conference on (pp. 135-140). IEEE.
Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M., & Gorecky, D. (2015). Towards Industry 4.0-Standardization as the crucial challenge for highly
modular, multi-vendor production systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 579-584.
Ziemba, E., & Obłąk, I. (2013). Critical success factors for ERP systems implementation in public administration. Interdisciplinary
Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 8(1), 1-19.
23. 23
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Any question?
Corresponding author: gekren@sinop.edu.tr
Editor's Notes
In this study, challenges and possible solutions for ERP systems of SMEs under the vision of Industry 4.0 are presented by reviewing literature.
Then the identified challenges and solutions are organized in terms of four different phases of an ERP system, such as system preparation & design, system installation & implementation, system adaption, system operations & maintenance.
This study makes an effort to make some contribution to the use of ERP systems by SMEs. The results of this study expected to support future works with regards to ERP adaption for SMEs, as variety of solutions to a range of challenges that faced by ERP systems for SMEs.
Within the scope of this study, we examined
Industry 4.0
Challenges Faced by ERP Systems for SMEs
The specific phases of a typical ERP system
Possible challenges and solutions for SMEs according to identified phases of an ERP system
Industry 4.0 is one of the strategic initiatives of the German government, which was adapted to the High-Tech Strategy 2020 Action Plan 2011.
The first industrial revolution was the mechanization of manufacturing equipment powered by water and steam;
the second industrial revolution introduced mass production with the help of electrical power;
and third industrial revolution use electronics and computers to further automate manufacturing.
Nowadays, the next industrial revolution, as a young term named Industry 4.0 describes the increased integration of information and communication technologies into production environment; as it referred to a wide variety of concepts such as Cyber Physical Systems (CPS), smart machines, smart factories, smart data storage systems, Internet of Things (IoT), and human-environment interaction.
ERP is an enterprise-wide software package integrating business functions, such as manufacturing, inventory, shipping, logistics, distribution, invoicing, accounting, sales, marketing, billing, production, human resources and quality control, into a single system with a shared database.
These functions can be customized up to a certain limit according to the specific needs of each organization.
It provides ubiquitous access to its all resources of an organization or a company by their staff but also stakeholders.
Like ERPs, SMEs have also common characteristics such as such as fewer employees, less order or customers, low revenues.
You can see in this table what is the employee size and revenue of SMEs by different countries.
ERP systems adoption and implementation by SMEs is considered as a technological and organizational innovation.
Unfortunately, ERP implementation and maintenance is usually vendor-driven. Vendors usually continue to distribute software patches for bug fixes, and new enhanced releases. The efforts on post-implementation activities (maintenance and support) impact overall success of the ERP life-cycle.
Some of the critical factors affecting the successful adoption of any ERP system by SMEs are (1) a collaboration between the departments of the enterprise, (2) required skills for implementing any ERP system, (2) tracking and evaluation process of implementing ERP, (3) software training due to ERP system implementation, (6) convenience in technological infrastructure of the enterprise, (7) the technical support of software provider, (8) capability of management and staff, (9) existing financial and human resources of enterprise, (9) confidence level of staff, (10) quality of service provided.
Therefore, it is difficult for SMEs to adapt highly skilled applications and technologies of Industry 4.0, due to the fact that they usually have not got enough manpower to enter new areas, and also not having enough financial capacity to invest in emerging technologies as well as a skeptical attitude towards technology strategies.
What is the challenges as well as solutions faced by ERP systems for SMEs in the vision of Industry 4.0?
Lack of unified standards and protocols
Lack of using business intelligence capabilities of ERP systems
ERP as a huge investment for companies
Complexity of ERP systems
Changes and uncertainty during ERP system implementation
Let’s look at them..
ERP systems are considered to be the backbone for Industry 4.0.
The results show that ERP systems are considered as technologically and operationally ready for this revolution. However, there are some challenges about the lack of unified standards and protocols in machine-to-machine and machine to ERP systems.
proprietary communication protocols generally prevent machine-to-machine collaboration by locking vendors to access basic concepts of a smart factory. This is why unified global communication standards are required to set the stage for Industry 4.0; the success of Industry 4.0 depends on standardization actions between technology providers, integrators and end-users
ERP systems have not got a standard interface, as this makes them difficult to use legacy systems and increase maintenance costs
the usage of web standards in collaboration with automation systems or CPS must be considered in order to understand and use the benefits of CPS, such as web services of engineering tools (i.e. PLC, HMI)
Different from ERP I, an ERP II system is a kind of advanced information system which gathers customers, suppliers, supply chain management, customer relationship management and ERP under a single roof, and can be labeled as business intelligence
SMEs are still struggling to strengthen the advantages of ERP systems.
According to a research results; business intelligence capabilities (i.e. data integration, controlling activities, flexible decision making) offered by ERP systems are underutilized, as SMEs do not exactly use the advantages generated by ERP systems such as improved productivity, reducing costs, reliable performance, reductions in paperwork, or saving time, because of their common characteristics (less manpower to enter new areas, less money to invest technology, or skeptical attitude towards technology).
The implementation of proprietary ERP systems often requires high investments, and corporate time and resources (i.e. infrastructure, qualified staff). Initial costs for setup and support, the cost and time required for training staff to handle the new system are seen as limitations for adopting proprietary ERP systems.
Proprietary ERP systems have major players such as SAP, Oracle Applications, Microsoft Dynamics, the SAGE group, and Infor Global Solutions.
because of their costly licenses (for both server and web) as well as high installation costs, open source ERP systems offer a compelling alternative for organizations without customization for every implementation.
return on investment (ROI) of ERP systems are considered to be invaluable for SMEs. However, it is clearly obvious that ROI comes in medium or long term. In addition, ROI of an ERP system is usually very difficult to calculate
ERP systems are highly complex business information systems. SMEs, as well as cross-national companies, are often challenged by the growing complexity of ERP systems.
End-users usually need more time to complete tasks with more complex ERP interfaces.
when looking at the technical level of ERP systems, the complexity of the integration and the cost of efforts and benefits must be considered, such as ERP architecture in total, ERP architecture prepared for interface to production line, and ERP customizing issues for interface to production line etc.
SMEs often have complicated business processes and IT needs. Therefore, before starting to implement an ERP system, some factors must be considered, such as infrastructure resource planning, education about ERP systems and training facilities, human resource planning, top management commitment, and right people for the implementation.
Changes and uncertainty during ERP system implementations considerably affects ERP system's success, so creating a risk management schedule can be a solution. Besides, effective communication can be a solution to explain changes.
Uncertainty refers to any unexpected event during the ERP implementation. For example, if uncertainty during ERP system implementation has occurred, such as late delivery of required hardware, then it will affect all the later operations, e.g. data transfer and module integration.
several uncertainties met by SMEs during ERP implementation, such as no knowledge on whether the required budget is secured, inappropriate software selection, inexperienced project leaders, unclear role and responsibility for vendor and internal staff, poor teamwork, poor project planning, non-committed project partners, false software configuration and system integration..
Within the scope of this study, the specific phases of an ERP system are defined as follows.
System preparation & design: In this phase requirements, specifications, and objectives are defined, ERP vendors and software packages (an ERP package that best fit with existing business processes and organizational requirements) are selected, contacts with consulting firms are established, required budget is elaborated and relevant standards and protocols (i.e. ISO 9001, communication standards, web standards) are defined and analyzed according to different flows and production processes.
System installation & implementation: This phase concerns the installation of ERP modules including unit testing, definition of authorizations for end-users, definition of the beginning or procedure starting, writing of user guides, preparation of user training, building integration test scenarios. Implementation stage concerns testing and final validation of the prototype. Appropriate testing for modules and integration tests for inter-modules are designed.
System adaption: Users’ understanding and assimilation of the new system is crucial in this phase. Key users are defined to control the tool in their area in terms of advantages and disadvantages of ERP system. BPR pushes radical change in business processes and contributes greatly to the successful adaption of ERP .
System operations & maintenance: Processes and flows (physical, informational, decisional, and financial) that are effectively improved in areas such as sales, purchasing, accounting, planning, controlling, supplying etc. in this phase. Besides, the company’s operational activities (information and financial flows) are controlled
.
The challenges and solutions are categorized according to identified phases of an ERP system as shown in Table.
Industry 4.0 will not only strengthen companies’ competitive position, but also drive solutions to both global and national challenges (Wan & Zhou, 2015; Deshmukh et al., 2015).
To address this, a set of challenges and available solutions of ERP systems in the face of SMEs presented in this study.
In addition, with regards to the possible solutions presented here, an ERP system might be tailored to the requirements of SMEs to meet their business processes
A set of suggestions in the case of SMEs as follows:
ERP systems must be adapted to the requirements of SMEs,
Financial constraints play a major role in the usage ERP systems for SMEs, thus there is an urgent need for flexible pricing policies,
Open source ERP systems may be an alternative solution for customization as well as reduction of high initial costs for setup and support,
End-users of ERP systems in SMEs should be trained to gain more experience and competence as well as to handle new system and reduce complexity.
The functionality of the ERP systems must be in smaller size, less complex as well as having special features in order to fit common characteristics of SMEs,
ERP software usually forces a rigid structure, but it is required to be more flexible for SMEs.