Workshop -- How to successfully write a scientific paper?KnihovnaUTB
Přednášející: Katarzyna Gaca-Zając, PhD Eng. | Elsevier
***********
Během školení se jeho účastníci naučí úspěšně napsat kvalitní vědecký článek, který bude korespondovat s vědeckou komunitou a umožní jeho autorům získat uznání. Představeny budou osvědčené postupy, které jsou založeny na zkušenostech výzkumných pracovníků, redaktorů a čtenářů. Školení je určeno především začínajícím výzkumným pracovníkům, vítáni jsou ale všichni vědečtí pracovníci a akademici.
**********
During this training the attendees will learn how to successfully write a good quality research paper, which will resonate well with the scientific community and will allow them to gain recognition. A summary of the best practices in writing will be presented and these are based on experience of researchers, editors and readers. The training is addressed primarily to young researchers, although senior academics are also welcome to attend.
The cover letter is your chance to lobby on behalf of your manuscript. The letter is far from just a formality and should be written with the same care as your manuscript’s text (if not more). Ultimately, your cover letter is designed to influence the decision of the editor to send your manuscript out for peer review. Sometimes great science will be reviewed regardless of the cover letter, but a well written cover letter is useful for the vast majority of scientists who want to make their research stand out. American Journal Experts wishes you the best of luck with your research!
Workshop -- How to successfully write a scientific paper?KnihovnaUTB
Přednášející: Katarzyna Gaca-Zając, PhD Eng. | Elsevier
***********
Během školení se jeho účastníci naučí úspěšně napsat kvalitní vědecký článek, který bude korespondovat s vědeckou komunitou a umožní jeho autorům získat uznání. Představeny budou osvědčené postupy, které jsou založeny na zkušenostech výzkumných pracovníků, redaktorů a čtenářů. Školení je určeno především začínajícím výzkumným pracovníkům, vítáni jsou ale všichni vědečtí pracovníci a akademici.
**********
During this training the attendees will learn how to successfully write a good quality research paper, which will resonate well with the scientific community and will allow them to gain recognition. A summary of the best practices in writing will be presented and these are based on experience of researchers, editors and readers. The training is addressed primarily to young researchers, although senior academics are also welcome to attend.
The cover letter is your chance to lobby on behalf of your manuscript. The letter is far from just a formality and should be written with the same care as your manuscript’s text (if not more). Ultimately, your cover letter is designed to influence the decision of the editor to send your manuscript out for peer review. Sometimes great science will be reviewed regardless of the cover letter, but a well written cover letter is useful for the vast majority of scientists who want to make their research stand out. American Journal Experts wishes you the best of luck with your research!
These are a few elements that are required to fulfill a dissertation in any subject. Try these few steps and you can write a dissertation in a very few days. For more dissertation help go to http://www.writengine.com/dissertations/affordable-dissertation
A firm grasp of scientific method and ability to write clearly and convincingly is a great assert to any professional in sciences.
Conducting research and publishing peer reviewed papers train professionals in both scientific method and writing. Moreover, having research papers in your resume is considered a huge plus in both industry and academia. However, conducting research and getting them published requires professionals to approach the problem and present their solutions form a unique angle. The talk will address research in general and writing research papers. Specifically, the talk will cover peer review process, what is a contribution?, and basic composition of
a research paper, describing potential pitfalls.
Seminar given on 20 June, 2012 within the course: La comunicación intercultural euroasiática en las condiciones del proceso de Bolonia from the University of Granada
Topics covered include:
Duties of editors, reviewers, and authors
What is “peer review” & brief history
Objectives & process of peer review
What editors & reviewers are looking for?
Surviving the peer review process
What leads to ACCEPTANCE
These are a few elements that are required to fulfill a dissertation in any subject. Try these few steps and you can write a dissertation in a very few days. For more dissertation help go to http://www.writengine.com/dissertations/affordable-dissertation
A firm grasp of scientific method and ability to write clearly and convincingly is a great assert to any professional in sciences.
Conducting research and publishing peer reviewed papers train professionals in both scientific method and writing. Moreover, having research papers in your resume is considered a huge plus in both industry and academia. However, conducting research and getting them published requires professionals to approach the problem and present their solutions form a unique angle. The talk will address research in general and writing research papers. Specifically, the talk will cover peer review process, what is a contribution?, and basic composition of
a research paper, describing potential pitfalls.
Seminar given on 20 June, 2012 within the course: La comunicación intercultural euroasiática en las condiciones del proceso de Bolonia from the University of Granada
Topics covered include:
Duties of editors, reviewers, and authors
What is “peer review” & brief history
Objectives & process of peer review
What editors & reviewers are looking for?
Surviving the peer review process
What leads to ACCEPTANCE
Scientific research and publication walk throughRoshni Mehta
Humble effort made in the form of this presentation will assist in the accomplishment of exploratory as well as result-oriented research studies. I shall feel amply rewarded if this slides proves helpful in the development of genuine research studies.
As a scientist, we must write, and, as an experimentalist, writing while you work strengthens your research. Writing a paper can be an integral part of observational science. Our manuscript can even be a blueprint for our experiments.
How to write a Great Research Paper?
The research paper is a significant piece of academic writing, in which the author performs research on a topic independently and writes a description of the results of that research. It is written to communicate to the community and to contribute to the advancement of knowledge. Types of papers include:
• Inventions
• Progress
• Survey
https://www.ThesisScientist.com
Taylor & Francis: Author and Researcher WorkshopSIBiUSP
Workshop para Autores e Pesquisadores 2015
Data: 08 de outubro de 2015
Horário: 10:30 - 14:30
Local: Auditório do INRAD - Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP - Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, s/nº – Rua 1 – Cerqueira César – São Paulo, SP.
These slides are related to our last event at the Sapienza University of Rome for the graduate students. Please follow our website: https://www.facebook.com/psa.sapienza
Similar to Tips & Trick Menembus Jurnal Internasional Ber-Impact Factor Tinggi (20)
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
Toxic effects of heavy metals : Lead and Arsenicsanjana502982
Heavy metals are naturally occuring metallic chemical elements that have relatively high density, and are toxic at even low concentrations. All toxic metals are termed as heavy metals irrespective of their atomic mass and density, eg. arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, thallium, chromium, etc.
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...Studia Poinsotiana
I Introduction
II Subalternation and Theology
III Theology and Dogmatic Declarations
IV The Mixed Principles of Theology
V Virtual Revelation: The Unity of Theology
VI Theology as a Natural Science
VII Theology’s Certitude
VIII Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
All the contents are fully attributable to the author, Doctor Victor Salas. Should you wish to get this text republished, get in touch with the author or the editorial committee of the Studia Poinsotiana. Insofar as possible, we will be happy to broker your contact.
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Tips & Trick Menembus Jurnal Internasional Ber-Impact Factor Tinggi
1. TIPS & TRICK
MENEMBUS
JURNAL INTERNASIONAL
BER-IMPACT FACTOR TINGGI
Dr. Satria Zulkarnaen Bisri
Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
University of Groningen
*Editorial Board MRS-ID Bulletin
2. Tentang saya
• Editorial Board
• Buletin MRS-ID
• Majalah 1000 Guru
• Reviewer for
• Science (AAAS)
• Advanced Materials (Wiley)
• Advanced Energy Materials
• ACS Nano
• Nanoscale (RSC)
• J. Materials Chemistry (RSC)
• Applied Physics Letters (AIP)
• Nanophotonics (SPIE)
• Funding Agency Belgia (FWO)
• Etc.
3. Outline
• Impact Factor
• Filosofi Menulis
• Menulis paper =
bercerita + memberitakan + menjual
• Tips & Tricks: Plotting Data
• Tips & Tricks: Ilustrasi
• Tips & Tricks: Introduction
• Tips & Tricks: Cover Letter
• Etika Publikasi
4. Apa itu Impact Factor?
42.351 31.477 36.425 33.265 15.409 14.385 12.940
푰풎풑풂풄풕 푭풂풄풕풐풓 (ퟐퟎퟏퟑ) =
Terhadap artikel terbitan 2011-2012
푻풐풕풂풍 푺풊풕풂풔풊 ퟐퟎퟏퟑ
푨풓풕풊풌풆풍 푻풆풓풃풊풕 ퟐퟎퟏퟐ + 푨풓풕풊풌풆풍 푻풆풓풃풊풕 (ퟐퟎퟏퟏ)
Terbit 2012
Jumlah sitasi = 81
6. Material Science
di Indonesia
Web of Science – Field: materials science
Address: Indonesia
Dari institusi beralamat di Indonesia
7. Mengapa harus publikasi?
• “Fame”
• Rekan sebidang
• Komunitasnya
• “Fortune”
• Promosi
• Dana Penelitian
• Kelulusan
• Tanggungjawab
• Masyarakat umum
• APBN & penyandang dana
“If your research does not
generate papers, it might just
as well not have been done”
George Whitesides
“Papers provide the shoulders
that others can stand on”
Bentuk komunikasi
8. Presentasi di Conference vs Paper di Jurnal
• “Menyerang”
• Menyampaikan ide
• Iklan
• Komunitas terbatas
• Sebatas ingatan
• “Bertahan”
• Mempertahankan ide
• Produk & manualnya
• Siapapun
• Abadi
9. Editorial Process
Reviewer
Submission
Editorial
Board
Editorial
Board
Reviewer
Reviewer
Reject
Reject
Major revision
or re-review
opportunity
Revision
Re-Appeal
Accept
Minor revision
10. Kenali Audiens-mu
Saya tidak
mengerti. Apa
itu graphene??
“Semakin tinggi impact factor, semakin lebar target audiens-nya”
“Tulis apa yang ingin orang lain baca, bukan apa yang ingin kita baca”
12. Berawal dari akhir
• Methods
• Results
• Discussions
• Conclusions
• Introduction
• Title
• Abstract
B. J. Habibie
Mulai ditulis pada saat sedang melakukan riset
Mulai ditulis pada saat:
• Sudah memutuskan jurnal target
• Story telling
Terakhir dibuat
13. Manuscript yang kuat
• Eksperimen dan Data yang Solid
• Pesannya clear, berguna, dan menarik (exciting)
• Konstruksi dan presentasinya logis
Kesimpulan menjawab tujuan
• Mudah untuk dibaca
Reviewer
Editor
18. Gambar, Plot, dan Caption
Dari: Danang Birowosuto, et al., Nature Materials, 2014.
19. Menyusun Referensi
Kumpulkan referensi-referensi sebelum memulai menulis
• Relevan
• Topik
• Statements
• Update
• Published & Accessible
• Jumlah (Proporsional)
• ? Self-citation
• Friend vs Enemy
20. Menyusun Referensi
Setiap jurnal yang berbeda memiliki format referensi yang berbeda
Advanced
Materials (Wiley)
Nature Materials
(NPG)
Gunakanlah Reference Manager !!
Zotero
www.zotero.org
gratis
22. Tips & Tricks
Basic introduction
More detailed background
General problem
Main result summary (“Here we show”)
Main result explanation
General context of the results
Broader perspectives
Hal yang sama untuk
Advanced Materials
23. Tips & Tricks Introduction
General Intro
State of the art
More Specific
Problems
Purpose statement
Main Results
Advanced Materials, 2012
24. English….. What…???
“Despite the current language of science is broken English,
a manuscript should be well written”
Complaint from an editor (Elsevier):
“This paper fell well below my threshold. I refuse to spend time trying to
understand what the author is trying to say. Besides, I really want to send a
message that they can`t submit garbage to us and expect us to fix it. My rule
of thumb is that if there are more than 6 grammatical errors in the abstract,
then I don`t waste my time carefully reading the rest.”
Cari bantuan “native speakers”
“Language editing services”
Meningkatkan kemampuan Bahasa Inggris
• Membaca jurnal-jurnal
• Journal club
• Sumber lain: Novel, Podcast, dll.
25. Editorial Process
Reviewer
Submission
Editorial
Board
Editorial
Board
Reviewer
Reviewer
Reject
Reject
Major revision
or re-review
opportunity
Revision
Re-Appeal
Accept
Minor revision
26. Tips & Tricks
Cover Letter
Se-personal mungkin
• Nama Jurnal
• Nama Editor
Identitas Manuscript
• Judul
• Author List
• Contact Author(s) – Senior
• E-mail
Tentang Field of study
• Importance
• State of The Art
• Problem to be solved
Isi manuscript
• Tujuan & Kesimpulan
• What`s new
• Claims
• Impacts
Kandidat reviewer
• Proposed – Fair
• Against
28. Editorial Process
Reviewer
Submission
Editorial
Board
Editorial
Board
Reviewer
Reviewer
Reject
Reject
Major revision
or re-review
opportunity
Revision
Re-Appeal
Accept
Minor revision
29. Menanggapi Referee`s reports
#1. Referee ada untuk meningkatkan kualitas manuscript kita
#2. Kenali referee dari tulisannya
#3. Sebaiknya ikuti mayoritas saran referee
#4. Jika tidak suka, jawablah dengan sopan
JUDUL