This presentation shows a timeline of some of the years in the article "Is there a Philippine Public Administration" By Prof. Alex Brillantes and Prof. Maricel Fernandez
Woodrow Wilson is considered the father of public administration for formally recognizing it as a discipline in 1887. He argued for separating politics from administration, establishing the dichotomy between the two. During 1927-1937, public administration developed as an independent discipline influenced by POSDCORB and a focus on principles of administration. Starting in 1938, these views faced criticism and challenges as administration was recognized as inherently political. From 1948-1970, public administration experienced a crisis of identity as its foundations were questioned. After 1971, new perspectives emerged focused on public policy and incorporating knowledge from other social sciences.
The document summarizes the evolution of the field of public administration from traditional to modern phases. It discusses key thinkers and developments that shaped the field, including Woodrow Wilson's politics-administration dichotomy, Frank Goodnow's examination of the dichotomy, and Leonard White's influential early textbook. It also outlines Max Weber's analysis of bureaucratic organizations and principles of bureaucracy. The summary traces the historical roots and changing paradigms that have influenced public administration theory and practice over time.
The document discusses the evolution of public administration from ancient to modern times. It covers the following key points:
- Public administration has existed in all societies to advance general welfare through activities like taxation, financial management, and administering justice. The idea of serving the public interest can be seen as far back as the Code of Hammurabi.
- Notable developments included China establishing the first centralized bureaucracy in the 2nd century BC and merit-based civil service exams. In the late 19th century, Woodrow Wilson distinguished between politics and an apolitical administration.
- The field of public administration evolved from an art to being studied scientifically. Scholars like Max Weber analyzed bureaucratic models while challenges in
The document discusses the evolution of public administration from ancient to modern times. It covers the following key points:
- Public administration has existed in all societies to advance general welfare through activities like taxation, financial management, and administering justice. The idea of serving the public interest can be seen as far back as the Code of Hammurabi.
- Notable developments included China establishing the first centralized bureaucracy in the 2nd century BC and merit-based civil service exams. In the late 19th century, Woodrow Wilson distinguished between politics and an apolitical administration.
- The field of public administration transitioned from an art to an attempt at a science through the works of scholars like Gulick, White
This document summarizes the evolution of the field of public administration from traditional to modern phases. It discusses key thinkers and works that helped establish public administration as a distinct field, including Woodrow Wilson's politics-administration dichotomy, Frank Goodnow's examination of that dichotomy, and Leonard White's influential early textbook. It also outlines Max Weber's analysis of bureaucratic organizations. Finally, it references a work questioning whether there is a distinct Philippine public administration and who it serves.
This document outlines the evolution of the field of public administration from its traditional/classical phase to modern developments. It discusses key thinkers and periods that have shaped the discipline, including Woodrow Wilson who argued for public administration as a professional field separate from politics. Max Weber is also cited for his influential analysis of bureaucratic organizations. The document then examines specific areas of specialization within public administration and ongoing concerns in the Philippines around issues like reorganization and corruption.
Lorenz von Stein is considered the founder of public administration science. He argued it relies on other disciplines and practitioners should concern themselves with both theory and practice. In the US, Woodrow Wilson is seen as the father for recognizing it in 1887, advocating for separating politics and administration. Key thinkers in the early 20th century included Gulick, Urwick, Fayol and Taylor. Definitions of public administration evolved over time as the field developed, addressing the executive branch activities, policymaking roles, and relationship to the public. New models like New Public Management and New Public Service also emerged in recent decades.
Public Administration has evolved through five stages:
1. Era of Orthodoxy (1887-1926) characterized the politics-administration dichotomy.
2. Principles of Administration (1927-1937) focused on universal principles of efficiency.
3. As Political Science (1938-1947) when behavioral thinkers challenged rational assumptions.
4. As Administrative Science (1948-1970) addressing postwar challenges and cross-cultural studies.
5. New Public Management (1971-present) emphasized reinventing government through privatization and deregulation.
The discipline was influenced by several theorists and developed differently in the Philippine context due to Spanish and American colonialism.
Woodrow Wilson is considered the father of public administration for formally recognizing it as a discipline in 1887. He argued for separating politics from administration, establishing the dichotomy between the two. During 1927-1937, public administration developed as an independent discipline influenced by POSDCORB and a focus on principles of administration. Starting in 1938, these views faced criticism and challenges as administration was recognized as inherently political. From 1948-1970, public administration experienced a crisis of identity as its foundations were questioned. After 1971, new perspectives emerged focused on public policy and incorporating knowledge from other social sciences.
The document summarizes the evolution of the field of public administration from traditional to modern phases. It discusses key thinkers and developments that shaped the field, including Woodrow Wilson's politics-administration dichotomy, Frank Goodnow's examination of the dichotomy, and Leonard White's influential early textbook. It also outlines Max Weber's analysis of bureaucratic organizations and principles of bureaucracy. The summary traces the historical roots and changing paradigms that have influenced public administration theory and practice over time.
The document discusses the evolution of public administration from ancient to modern times. It covers the following key points:
- Public administration has existed in all societies to advance general welfare through activities like taxation, financial management, and administering justice. The idea of serving the public interest can be seen as far back as the Code of Hammurabi.
- Notable developments included China establishing the first centralized bureaucracy in the 2nd century BC and merit-based civil service exams. In the late 19th century, Woodrow Wilson distinguished between politics and an apolitical administration.
- The field of public administration evolved from an art to being studied scientifically. Scholars like Max Weber analyzed bureaucratic models while challenges in
The document discusses the evolution of public administration from ancient to modern times. It covers the following key points:
- Public administration has existed in all societies to advance general welfare through activities like taxation, financial management, and administering justice. The idea of serving the public interest can be seen as far back as the Code of Hammurabi.
- Notable developments included China establishing the first centralized bureaucracy in the 2nd century BC and merit-based civil service exams. In the late 19th century, Woodrow Wilson distinguished between politics and an apolitical administration.
- The field of public administration transitioned from an art to an attempt at a science through the works of scholars like Gulick, White
This document summarizes the evolution of the field of public administration from traditional to modern phases. It discusses key thinkers and works that helped establish public administration as a distinct field, including Woodrow Wilson's politics-administration dichotomy, Frank Goodnow's examination of that dichotomy, and Leonard White's influential early textbook. It also outlines Max Weber's analysis of bureaucratic organizations. Finally, it references a work questioning whether there is a distinct Philippine public administration and who it serves.
This document outlines the evolution of the field of public administration from its traditional/classical phase to modern developments. It discusses key thinkers and periods that have shaped the discipline, including Woodrow Wilson who argued for public administration as a professional field separate from politics. Max Weber is also cited for his influential analysis of bureaucratic organizations. The document then examines specific areas of specialization within public administration and ongoing concerns in the Philippines around issues like reorganization and corruption.
Lorenz von Stein is considered the founder of public administration science. He argued it relies on other disciplines and practitioners should concern themselves with both theory and practice. In the US, Woodrow Wilson is seen as the father for recognizing it in 1887, advocating for separating politics and administration. Key thinkers in the early 20th century included Gulick, Urwick, Fayol and Taylor. Definitions of public administration evolved over time as the field developed, addressing the executive branch activities, policymaking roles, and relationship to the public. New models like New Public Management and New Public Service also emerged in recent decades.
Public Administration has evolved through five stages:
1. Era of Orthodoxy (1887-1926) characterized the politics-administration dichotomy.
2. Principles of Administration (1927-1937) focused on universal principles of efficiency.
3. As Political Science (1938-1947) when behavioral thinkers challenged rational assumptions.
4. As Administrative Science (1948-1970) addressing postwar challenges and cross-cultural studies.
5. New Public Management (1971-present) emphasized reinventing government through privatization and deregulation.
The discipline was influenced by several theorists and developed differently in the Philippine context due to Spanish and American colonialism.
Public administration involves the implementation of government policies and operations, including planning, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling government work. It has evolved over time from focusing on separating politics and administration, to emphasizing principles of administration and efficiency, to considering human factors and incorporating other social sciences. Public administration is significant as the key instrument of government to maintain order and protect citizens. It also enables development, supports modern welfare states by providing public services, and is an important subject of academic study.
Here is a discussion of the anti-poverty programs and their salient features of the administrations:
A) Pres. Rodrigo Duterte - Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps). It provides conditional cash transfers to extremely poor households to improve health, nutrition and education among children aged 0-14. It aims to break the intergenerational poverty cycle.
B) Former Pres. Benigno Aquino - Conditional Cash Transfer Program or 4Ps. It expanded the coverage, increased cash grants and added health insurance. It aimed to invest in human capital to reduce poverty in the long-run.
C) Former Pres. Arroyo - Kapit Bisig Laban sa K
This document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on public administration. Politics and administration were considered separate, with administrators implementing policy and politicians making it.
2) 1927-1937 focused on scientific management principles. Books defined optimal assembly lines for efficiency.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the dichotomy between politics and administration and questioned universal principles. Values could not be separated from administration.
4) 1950-1970 saw efforts to reconnect public administration with its political science roots to avoid being too narrow of a science. Comparative administration also emerged.
5) After 1970, public administration refined management techniques
The document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on the topic. Politics and administration were seen as distinct.
2) 1927-1937 focused on applying scientific management principles from business. A dichotomy between facts and values emerged.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the universality of administrative principles and the politics-administration dichotomy.
4) 1950-1970 sought to reconnect public administration with its political science roots and broaden its social and political focus.
5) Post-1970 solidified public administration as its own discipline focused on decision-making and defining "public." Recent technological changes
This document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on public administration. Politics and administration were considered separate, with administrators implementing policy and politicians making it.
2) 1927-1937 focused on scientific management principles. A key book defined principles of optimal assembly lines for efficiency.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the dichotomy between politics and administration and questioned universal principles. Authors argued administration involves values and contexts differ between organizations.
4) 1950-1970 saw efforts to reconnect public administration with its political science roots by considering both internal bureaucratic processes and external political pressures.
5) Post-1970 utilized
The document summarizes the six paradigms of public administration:
1) Politics/Administration Dichotomy (1900-1926) which distinguished between politics and administration
2) Principles of Administration (1927-1937) which focused on universal principles
3) Challenge to Paradigm (1938-1950) which questioned the dichotomy and principles
4) Public Administration as Political Science (1950-1970) which saw it as a subfield of political science
5) Public Administration as Management (1956-1970) with a focus on techniques
6) Emergence of Governance (1990-present) which emphasizes joint governance responsibilities
It also mentions new paradigms like reinventing government and e-g
The document summarizes the six paradigms of public administration:
1) Politics/Administration Dichotomy (1900-1926) which distinguished between politics and administration
2) Principles of Administration (1927-1937) which focused on universal principles
3) Challenge to Paradigm (1938-1950) which questioned the dichotomy and principles
4) Public Administration as Political Science (1950-1970) which saw it as a subfield of political science
5) Public Administration as Management (1956-1970) with a focus on techniques
6) Emergence of Governance (1990-present) which emphasizes joint governance roles. It also discusses new paradigms like reinventing government and e-g
1) In the 1830s, Alexis de Tocqueville observed the phenomenon of individualism in America, which he contrasted with the egoism he saw in Europe.
2) The progressive movement led to reforms like the Pendleton Act in 1883, which professionalized the civil service through a merit-based hiring system.
3) There have been various attempts to define public administration, with scholars focusing on elements like its role in policymaking, fiscal administration, and organization and management of government. Its relationship to political science has also been an ongoing topic of discussion.
Woodrow Wilson is considered the father of public administration for his 1887 work "The Study of Administration", which established administration as its own academic discipline separate from politics. Frank Goodnow later argued that politics and administration could be separated, with politics dealing with policy and administration dealing with execution. Early 20th century saw focus on efficiency and development of principles of administration. Later challenges rejected the separation of administration and politics, and viewed administration as operating within political and social contexts. Recent trends include comparative public administration, development administration, and market-oriented approaches. Comparative public administration involves comparing administrative systems and specific elements across countries.
The document traces the evolution of organization theories from classical to integrative approaches. It discusses early theorists like Taylor who promoted scientific management and Gulick who developed the POSDCORB framework. It then outlines criticisms by Simon, Waldo and Appleby and the introduction of new concepts like cooptation by Selznick. The document also discusses contributions by other key figures like Follett, Mayo, Barnard, Maslow and their development of theories around human relations, organizational behavior, motivation and management.
The document summarizes the evolution of paradigms in public administration from 1900 to the present. It discusses 6 paradigms: 1) Politics/Administration Dichotomy from 1900-1926 which saw PA emerge as a discipline; 2) Principles of Administration from 1926-1937 focused on scientific management; 3) PA as a Political Science from 1950-1970 as it was situated within political science departments; 4) PA as Management from 1956-1970 emphasized organizational theory and management; 5) PA as Public Administration from 1970 onward reestablished PA as an independent field; and 6) From Government to Governance from 1990 which broadened the concept to additional actors. The future of digital governance is also discussed.
Modern public administration has gone through several phases since the 1950s: (1) development administration from the 1950s-1960s which focused on helping developing countries rebuild after WWII, (2) new public administration in the 1970s which addressed the "identity crisis" facing the field, (3) new public management in the 1980s-1990s which emphasized market-based reforms, and (4) governance which views public administration more broadly. Development administration aimed to help countries undergoing social and economic transformation through innovation management and the administration of development projects with Western aid. The Philippines also drew on development administration principles but faced its own "identity crisis" in defining an approach rooted to its own aspirations.
This document discusses the meaning and scope of public administration and how it has evolved over time. It begins by noting there is no consensus on a definition and different writers have defined it in different ways, either broadly to include policymaking or narrowly as just the executive branch. It discusses how early thinkers like Woodrow Wilson viewed public administration and principles that were established. Over time, factors like industrialization, technology development, and scientific management movement influenced the growth of public administration as an academic discipline in the late 19th/early 20th century. The core components of administration are also outlined.
This document summarizes key ideas and thinkers in the development of comparative public administration as a field of study. It discusses early influences like Woodrow Wilson's politics-administration dichotomy and Max Weber's ideal type of bureaucracy. It also outlines the origins and evolution of the field from development administration to new public management. Major conceptual approaches to comparative methodology like functionalism and neo-institutionalism are introduced. Finally, it identifies common cross-cutting topics of analysis like corruption, culture, and policy implementation that comparative public administration seeks to understand across contexts.
This document discusses the evolution of public administration theories and practices. It covers the development of public administration and three main theories: Classical Public Administration Theory, New Public Management Theory, and Postmodern Public Administration Theory. It also describes six paradigms of traditional public administration models and how public administration has taken on new roles in modern society, including designing policy, implementing policy, and serving as an agent of change.
This document discusses the evolution of public administration theories and practices. It covers the development of public administration and three main theories: Classical Public Administration Theory, New Public Management Theory, and Postmodern Public Administration Theory. It also describes six paradigms of traditional public administration models and how public administration has taken on new roles in modern society, including designing policy, implementing policy, and serving as a change agent.
The New Public Administration emerged in the 1960s as a response to the traditional, managerial approach of public administration. It focused on making public administration more responsive to social issues and promoting values like social equity, fairness, and participation. The Minnowbrook Conference of 1968 was influential in developing the principles of the New Public Administration, emphasizing public administration's role in facilitating social change and an active citizenry. The New Public Administration rejected the value-neutral stance and hierarchical structure of traditional public administration, instead prioritizing flexibility, relevance to contemporary problems, and a client-oriented approach.
The Progressive Movement arose in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in response to concerns over environmental protection, economic policy, and their implementation. It gained political influence through national and local politics and advocated for environmental and economic reforms. This led to increased public awareness of environmental issues and consideration of public input in policy decisions, changing perceptions around topics like land use, pollution, and conservation. By the 1960s, environmental protection had become a key debate between Republicans and Democrats, resulting in landmark laws like the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
Public administration involves the implementation of government policies and operations, including planning, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling government work. It has evolved over time from focusing on separating politics and administration, to emphasizing principles of administration and efficiency, to considering human factors and incorporating other social sciences. Public administration is significant as the key instrument of government to maintain order and protect citizens. It also enables development, supports modern welfare states by providing public services, and is an important subject of academic study.
Here is a discussion of the anti-poverty programs and their salient features of the administrations:
A) Pres. Rodrigo Duterte - Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps). It provides conditional cash transfers to extremely poor households to improve health, nutrition and education among children aged 0-14. It aims to break the intergenerational poverty cycle.
B) Former Pres. Benigno Aquino - Conditional Cash Transfer Program or 4Ps. It expanded the coverage, increased cash grants and added health insurance. It aimed to invest in human capital to reduce poverty in the long-run.
C) Former Pres. Arroyo - Kapit Bisig Laban sa K
This document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on public administration. Politics and administration were considered separate, with administrators implementing policy and politicians making it.
2) 1927-1937 focused on scientific management principles. Books defined optimal assembly lines for efficiency.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the dichotomy between politics and administration and questioned universal principles. Values could not be separated from administration.
4) 1950-1970 saw efforts to reconnect public administration with its political science roots to avoid being too narrow of a science. Comparative administration also emerged.
5) After 1970, public administration refined management techniques
The document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on the topic. Politics and administration were seen as distinct.
2) 1927-1937 focused on applying scientific management principles from business. A dichotomy between facts and values emerged.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the universality of administrative principles and the politics-administration dichotomy.
4) 1950-1970 sought to reconnect public administration with its political science roots and broaden its social and political focus.
5) Post-1970 solidified public administration as its own discipline focused on decision-making and defining "public." Recent technological changes
This document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on public administration. Politics and administration were considered separate, with administrators implementing policy and politicians making it.
2) 1927-1937 focused on scientific management principles. A key book defined principles of optimal assembly lines for efficiency.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the dichotomy between politics and administration and questioned universal principles. Authors argued administration involves values and contexts differ between organizations.
4) 1950-1970 saw efforts to reconnect public administration with its political science roots by considering both internal bureaucratic processes and external political pressures.
5) Post-1970 utilized
The document summarizes the six paradigms of public administration:
1) Politics/Administration Dichotomy (1900-1926) which distinguished between politics and administration
2) Principles of Administration (1927-1937) which focused on universal principles
3) Challenge to Paradigm (1938-1950) which questioned the dichotomy and principles
4) Public Administration as Political Science (1950-1970) which saw it as a subfield of political science
5) Public Administration as Management (1956-1970) with a focus on techniques
6) Emergence of Governance (1990-present) which emphasizes joint governance responsibilities
It also mentions new paradigms like reinventing government and e-g
The document summarizes the six paradigms of public administration:
1) Politics/Administration Dichotomy (1900-1926) which distinguished between politics and administration
2) Principles of Administration (1927-1937) which focused on universal principles
3) Challenge to Paradigm (1938-1950) which questioned the dichotomy and principles
4) Public Administration as Political Science (1950-1970) which saw it as a subfield of political science
5) Public Administration as Management (1956-1970) with a focus on techniques
6) Emergence of Governance (1990-present) which emphasizes joint governance roles. It also discusses new paradigms like reinventing government and e-g
1) In the 1830s, Alexis de Tocqueville observed the phenomenon of individualism in America, which he contrasted with the egoism he saw in Europe.
2) The progressive movement led to reforms like the Pendleton Act in 1883, which professionalized the civil service through a merit-based hiring system.
3) There have been various attempts to define public administration, with scholars focusing on elements like its role in policymaking, fiscal administration, and organization and management of government. Its relationship to political science has also been an ongoing topic of discussion.
Woodrow Wilson is considered the father of public administration for his 1887 work "The Study of Administration", which established administration as its own academic discipline separate from politics. Frank Goodnow later argued that politics and administration could be separated, with politics dealing with policy and administration dealing with execution. Early 20th century saw focus on efficiency and development of principles of administration. Later challenges rejected the separation of administration and politics, and viewed administration as operating within political and social contexts. Recent trends include comparative public administration, development administration, and market-oriented approaches. Comparative public administration involves comparing administrative systems and specific elements across countries.
The document traces the evolution of organization theories from classical to integrative approaches. It discusses early theorists like Taylor who promoted scientific management and Gulick who developed the POSDCORB framework. It then outlines criticisms by Simon, Waldo and Appleby and the introduction of new concepts like cooptation by Selznick. The document also discusses contributions by other key figures like Follett, Mayo, Barnard, Maslow and their development of theories around human relations, organizational behavior, motivation and management.
The document summarizes the evolution of paradigms in public administration from 1900 to the present. It discusses 6 paradigms: 1) Politics/Administration Dichotomy from 1900-1926 which saw PA emerge as a discipline; 2) Principles of Administration from 1926-1937 focused on scientific management; 3) PA as a Political Science from 1950-1970 as it was situated within political science departments; 4) PA as Management from 1956-1970 emphasized organizational theory and management; 5) PA as Public Administration from 1970 onward reestablished PA as an independent field; and 6) From Government to Governance from 1990 which broadened the concept to additional actors. The future of digital governance is also discussed.
Modern public administration has gone through several phases since the 1950s: (1) development administration from the 1950s-1960s which focused on helping developing countries rebuild after WWII, (2) new public administration in the 1970s which addressed the "identity crisis" facing the field, (3) new public management in the 1980s-1990s which emphasized market-based reforms, and (4) governance which views public administration more broadly. Development administration aimed to help countries undergoing social and economic transformation through innovation management and the administration of development projects with Western aid. The Philippines also drew on development administration principles but faced its own "identity crisis" in defining an approach rooted to its own aspirations.
This document discusses the meaning and scope of public administration and how it has evolved over time. It begins by noting there is no consensus on a definition and different writers have defined it in different ways, either broadly to include policymaking or narrowly as just the executive branch. It discusses how early thinkers like Woodrow Wilson viewed public administration and principles that were established. Over time, factors like industrialization, technology development, and scientific management movement influenced the growth of public administration as an academic discipline in the late 19th/early 20th century. The core components of administration are also outlined.
This document summarizes key ideas and thinkers in the development of comparative public administration as a field of study. It discusses early influences like Woodrow Wilson's politics-administration dichotomy and Max Weber's ideal type of bureaucracy. It also outlines the origins and evolution of the field from development administration to new public management. Major conceptual approaches to comparative methodology like functionalism and neo-institutionalism are introduced. Finally, it identifies common cross-cutting topics of analysis like corruption, culture, and policy implementation that comparative public administration seeks to understand across contexts.
This document discusses the evolution of public administration theories and practices. It covers the development of public administration and three main theories: Classical Public Administration Theory, New Public Management Theory, and Postmodern Public Administration Theory. It also describes six paradigms of traditional public administration models and how public administration has taken on new roles in modern society, including designing policy, implementing policy, and serving as an agent of change.
This document discusses the evolution of public administration theories and practices. It covers the development of public administration and three main theories: Classical Public Administration Theory, New Public Management Theory, and Postmodern Public Administration Theory. It also describes six paradigms of traditional public administration models and how public administration has taken on new roles in modern society, including designing policy, implementing policy, and serving as a change agent.
The New Public Administration emerged in the 1960s as a response to the traditional, managerial approach of public administration. It focused on making public administration more responsive to social issues and promoting values like social equity, fairness, and participation. The Minnowbrook Conference of 1968 was influential in developing the principles of the New Public Administration, emphasizing public administration's role in facilitating social change and an active citizenry. The New Public Administration rejected the value-neutral stance and hierarchical structure of traditional public administration, instead prioritizing flexibility, relevance to contemporary problems, and a client-oriented approach.
The Progressive Movement arose in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in response to concerns over environmental protection, economic policy, and their implementation. It gained political influence through national and local politics and advocated for environmental and economic reforms. This led to increased public awareness of environmental issues and consideration of public input in policy decisions, changing perceptions around topics like land use, pollution, and conservation. By the 1960s, environmental protection had become a key debate between Republicans and Democrats, resulting in landmark laws like the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Timeline-Introduction to Public Administration.pptx
1. "Is there a Philippine Public Administration"
By Prof. Alex Brillantes and Prof. Maricel Fernandez
1900
• Frank Goodnow (1900),
the “Father of American
Public Administration,”
presented a more
meticulous examination of
politics-administration
dichotomy in his book,
“Politics and
Administration” that
“supplanted the traditional
concern with the separation
of powers among the
various branches of the
government.”
1918
• Frank Goodnow (1900), the
“Father of American Public
Administration,” presented a
more meticulous
examination of politics-
administration dichotomy in
his book, “Politics and
Administration” that
“supplanted the traditional
concern with the separation
of powers among the various
branches of the
government.”.
1926
• It was in 1926 that the first text in
the field of public administration
was written by Leonard D. White.
His book, Introduction to the Study
of Public Administration, 7 is one
of the most influential texts in
public administration to date
• Mary Parker Follet (1926) also
made some significant contribution
to the discourse of Public
Administration as one of the
proponents of participatory
management and the “law of
situation” which can be attributed
to the concept of contingency
management. She illustrated the
advantages of participatory
management in her article, “The
Giving of Orders. “
1938
• Chester Barnard (1938)
presented a more
comprehensive theory of
organizational behavior
when he wrote the
functions of the
executive. He argued that
for the executive to
become more effective,
he should maintain an
equilibrium between the
needs of the employees
and the organization.
1943
• Maslow (1943), on the other hand,
focused on the hierarchical needs of
the individual. His “theory of human
motivation,” states that the human
being has five sets of needs:
physiological, safety, love or
affiliation, esteem and ultimately, and
self-actualization. His concepts were
later explored and developed into
more comprehensive theories and
principles as advocated by other
researches in organizational behavior
and management
01
Date
2. "Is there a Philippine Public Administration"
By Prof. Alex Brillantes and Prof. Maricel Fernandez
1946
• Max Weber (1946), a
German sociologist who is
known as the “Father of
Modern Sociology,” made a
lucid descriptive analysis of
bureaucratic organizations.
He presented some major
variables or features of
bureaucracy such as:
hierarchy, division of labor,
formally written rules and
procedures, impersonality
and neutrality; hence,
providing a reference point in
evaluating both the good and
bad effects of bureaucratic
structures.
1948
• In 1948, Dwight Waldo
tried to establish the
direction and thrust of
Public Administration as a
field of study in his book,
“The Administrative State,”
which hit the “gospel of
efficiency” that dominated
the administrative thinking
prior to Word War II.
1970
• In the context of “emerging
nation,” Landau (1970)
described DA as the
engineering of social
change. Likewise,
according to Ilchman
(1970), these countries
were “concerned with
increasing the capacity of
the state to produce goods
and services to meet and
induce changing demands.”
1979
• Gant (1979) on the other
hand, defined DA as not
merely addressing state
functions such as public
service delivery and
enforcement of laws but
the inducement and
management of change to
pursue development
aspirations.
1982
• Caiden (1982) also noted that
the genesis of Public
Administration must have had
originated from monarchial
Europe where household
officials were divided into two
groups: one in charge of public
affairs, i.e. the administration of
justice, finance, training of
armies, and the other is
responsible for personal services
3. "Is there a Philippine Public Administration"
By Prof. Alex Brillantes and Prof. Maricel Fernandez
1984
• (Chilcote 1984) Nef
and Dwivedi (1981) on
the other hand,
attributed the concept
of DA to Goswami in
1955 and later
popularized by Riggs
and Weidner. They
coined the term
“development
administration” to refer
to developing countries
which are largely found
in Asia, Latin America,
and Africa
1987
• If the roots of Public
Administration as a
distinct field of study
have to be traced, the
tendency is to draw on
Woodrow Wilson’s 1887
classic essay, “The
Study of Public
Administration,” which
was written at the height
of Progressive
Movement in the US.
1993
• The Spanish colonizers
enacted the “Maura
Law” in 1893. The law
included the
establishment of
tribunals municipals and
juntas provincials.
1995
• Dye (1995) said that
certain theoretical
approaches and
models have been
introduced in studying
public policy which
include institutional,
process, group, elite,
rational, incremental,
game theory, public
choice and systems
model.
1996
• As Briones (1996) puts it, “public
fiscal administration embraces the
formulation, implementation, and
evaluation of policies and decisions on
taxation and revenue administration;
resource allocation, budgeting, and
public expenditure; public borrowing
and debt management; and accounting
and auditing.”
4. "Is there a Philippine Public Administration"
By Prof. Alex Brillantes and Prof. Maricel Fernandez
1998
• Such arrangement,
according to Caiden (1982),
has existed in all societies.
All societies are devoted to
advancing the general
welfare or the public
interest. The idea that
“public administration
should not be considered
administration of the public
but administration for the
public” has been practiced
and expressed in the Code
of Hammurabi, in
Confucianism and in the
funeral oration of Pericles
2000
• Cariño (2000), in her
reflections on the term
“governance,” identified
actors and factors that
pushed for governance.
She acknowledges that
governance is not the
sole responsibility of the
government per se but
the role of the market
and civil society are of
equal importance too
and should also be
recognized.
2004
• In October 4, 2004, the
Department of Budget
and Management
(DBM) and the Civil
Service Commission
(CSC) pursued the
Rationalization Program
as mandated in EO 366.
2005
• An ADB document
(2005) affirmed that
good governance is
synonymous with sound
development
management. They then
identified some key
principles of
development which may
be considered as
elements of good
governance. These are:
accountability,
participation,
predictability, and
transparency.