Monitoring is the continuous collection of data and information on specified indicators to assess the implementation of a development intervention in relation to activity schedules and expenditure of allocated funds, and progress and achievements in relation to its intended outcome.
Evaluation is the periodic assessment of the design implementation, outcome, and impact of a development intervention. It should assess the relevance and achievement of the intended outcome, and implementation performance in terms of effectiveness and efficiency, and the nature, distribution, and sustainability of impact.
6 M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation of Aid ProjectsTony
A series of course modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
This is part 6 of 11, beginning with 2 modules on leadership and conflict resolution, then 9 modules on project cycle management.
This module has 3 handouts and presenter notes as separate documents.
Sample Proposal: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-watsan-training-sample-proposal-09
Slides as a handout: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-me-handout
Presenter notes: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-module-6-presenter-notes
Monitoring is the continuous collection of data and information on specified indicators to assess the implementation of a development intervention in relation to activity schedules and expenditure of allocated funds, and progress and achievements in relation to its intended outcome.
Evaluation is the periodic assessment of the design implementation, outcome, and impact of a development intervention. It should assess the relevance and achievement of the intended outcome, and implementation performance in terms of effectiveness and efficiency, and the nature, distribution, and sustainability of impact.
6 M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation of Aid ProjectsTony
A series of course modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
This is part 6 of 11, beginning with 2 modules on leadership and conflict resolution, then 9 modules on project cycle management.
This module has 3 handouts and presenter notes as separate documents.
Sample Proposal: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-watsan-training-sample-proposal-09
Slides as a handout: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-me-handout
Presenter notes: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-module-6-presenter-notes
This presentation explains the difference between Monitoring and Evaluation; the types of M&E frameworks; steps in logical framework and its difference from theory of change.
Identifying the basic purposes and scope of M&E. Describing the functions of an M&E plan. Identifying and understanding the main components of an M&E plan
Monitoring and evaluation is a vital component that determines the effectiveness of a corporation's assistance by establishing clear links between past, present and future initiatives and results. The process helps in improving the programme performance and achieving desired results. It provides opportunities for fine-tuning, re-orientation and planning of the programme effectively, without which it becomes impossible to measure the success and impact of the programme even if the approach is right.
Presentation Training on Result Based Management (RBM) for M&E StaffFida Karim 🇵🇰
Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation & Reporting together for developmental results: Results-based Management-RBM (RBM)?
Logical Framework Approach (LFA)
Planning for results
Monitoring for results
Evaluating for results
Enhancing the use of knowledge from monitoring and evaluation
A series of modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
Part 7 of 11.
There are two handouts to go with this module, Population Indicators, and a Logframe with blanks. http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/population-indicators-handout and http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/exercise-watsan-logframe-with-blanks
Promoting a culture of monitoring and evaluation in educational institutions. How to develop a M&E system, and grounding M&E planning on the Logical Framework Approach, and using Logframe as reference for M&E.
Introduction to the Logical Framework ApproachDamien Sweeney
An introduction into the Logical Framework Approach, and its use and usefulness for project design, project planning, in the international development sector and beyond.
Performance Management for Nonprofits: Simplifying and Maximizing Organizati...Community IT Innovators
Get introduced to the tools necessary to optimize your organization’s current data, enabling you to turn data into information to tell the story of the organization’s impact in a powerful way. Contact Karen Finn of Results Leadership Group and/or Katherine Mowers of Community IT Innovators to explore how you can simplify and maximize your organization's impact data.
This presentation includes:
1. An overview of Results-based Accountability and an approach for identifying impact performance measures (activity during workshop session);
2. Where to start to assess your current organizational data and business systems in light of these performance measures;
3. An introduction to a process for reviewing software and determining a system that will be most useful to the organization’s operations.
4. An overview of software options used to support performance management, demonstrate impact and help to strategically plan for improvements.
We are happy to have a conversation about where you are at - and where you want to go - with your performance management and nonprofit business systems.
This presentation explains the difference between Monitoring and Evaluation; the types of M&E frameworks; steps in logical framework and its difference from theory of change.
Identifying the basic purposes and scope of M&E. Describing the functions of an M&E plan. Identifying and understanding the main components of an M&E plan
Monitoring and evaluation is a vital component that determines the effectiveness of a corporation's assistance by establishing clear links between past, present and future initiatives and results. The process helps in improving the programme performance and achieving desired results. It provides opportunities for fine-tuning, re-orientation and planning of the programme effectively, without which it becomes impossible to measure the success and impact of the programme even if the approach is right.
Presentation Training on Result Based Management (RBM) for M&E StaffFida Karim 🇵🇰
Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation & Reporting together for developmental results: Results-based Management-RBM (RBM)?
Logical Framework Approach (LFA)
Planning for results
Monitoring for results
Evaluating for results
Enhancing the use of knowledge from monitoring and evaluation
A series of modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
Part 7 of 11.
There are two handouts to go with this module, Population Indicators, and a Logframe with blanks. http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/population-indicators-handout and http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/exercise-watsan-logframe-with-blanks
Promoting a culture of monitoring and evaluation in educational institutions. How to develop a M&E system, and grounding M&E planning on the Logical Framework Approach, and using Logframe as reference for M&E.
Introduction to the Logical Framework ApproachDamien Sweeney
An introduction into the Logical Framework Approach, and its use and usefulness for project design, project planning, in the international development sector and beyond.
Performance Management for Nonprofits: Simplifying and Maximizing Organizati...Community IT Innovators
Get introduced to the tools necessary to optimize your organization’s current data, enabling you to turn data into information to tell the story of the organization’s impact in a powerful way. Contact Karen Finn of Results Leadership Group and/or Katherine Mowers of Community IT Innovators to explore how you can simplify and maximize your organization's impact data.
This presentation includes:
1. An overview of Results-based Accountability and an approach for identifying impact performance measures (activity during workshop session);
2. Where to start to assess your current organizational data and business systems in light of these performance measures;
3. An introduction to a process for reviewing software and determining a system that will be most useful to the organization’s operations.
4. An overview of software options used to support performance management, demonstrate impact and help to strategically plan for improvements.
We are happy to have a conversation about where you are at - and where you want to go - with your performance management and nonprofit business systems.
Via Evaluation's Jessica Weitzel and Caroline Taggart give you the tools and techniques for maximizing the usefulness of data that most organizations already collect, or could easily begin to collect.
More information: viaevaluation.com
Improving services, leading change – implementing change in rapid cyclesNHS England
Presentation from the Practice Manager Development Conference: Implementing change in rapid cycles. The benefits and practicalities of PDSA.
Sue Collis
This presentation provides information from an interactive informational session given at the Oakland Literacy Coalition in 2015. The presentation was led by Nada Djordjevich, Paul Gibson and Julie Johnson of Gibson and Associates. The interactive workshop was designed to help non-profits and school-based services understand how to use program evaluation to improve their programs, inform funders and create accountability. The event was designed for an audience somewhat familiar with program evaluation and uses tools designed in multiple contexts, including municipal funding, public health, education, nonprofit arts, childcare and environmental agencies. The event was well-received with several agencies using the tools with their own agencies in follow-up meetings.
Roundtable with the Communication 4 Development NetworkResearch to Action
The C4D Network joined Research to Action on the 27 July to discuss the findings of their mapping of the C4D landscape conducted in 2016. The mapping covered over 50 countries across the world.
In the final episode of the cup of tea webinar series, John Young Head of ODI's RAPID programme shared his reflections on monitoring and evaluation of research uptake. The final webinar took place on Thursday 25 May.
On Thursday 27th of April in the penultimate episode of the R2A webinar series, Dilshani Dissanayake a member of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Colombo shared her experiences of participating in writing clubs and communicating medical research. Dilshani spoke about her participation in the AuthorAID programme, run by INASP, which focuses on peer to peer mentoring to improve science communications and research promotion.
In Episode 2 of Research to Action's 'Cup of tea with' webinar series Yaso Kunaratnam Policy & Research Officer at UKCDS spoke about competition, collaboration and impact from the perspective of donors and funders of development research. The webinar took a slightly different approach to the topic stakeholder engagement, looking at the under explored area of how funders can collaborate more. Yaso presented findings from UKCDS' latest report about how funders can better support research uptake and impact.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
TTIPEC: Monitoring and Evaluation (Session 2)
1. Monitoring & Evaluation
IN PRACTICE
TTI PEC Anglophone Africa Regional Peer Learning Workshop
Coconut Grove Regency Hotel | Accra, Ghana
Wednesday, July 16th, 2014
!
!
Mo Adefeso-OlatejuRebecca Oluwatoyin Doherty
2. Linking Monitoring,
Evaluation, & Measurement
SHORT VIDEOS
Importance of monitoring & evaluation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mBcb-AQ8xQ
4:00minutes - end
!
Indicators
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZqOKW2_jNU
!
Indicators: Basic Concepts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmrDNuJzRv4
4. 4 BASIC M&E POINTS
MUST BE FOLLOWED
Who is our population? What data is to be collected
from them? Or about them?
How will the data captured enhance communications?
And also fit within the rest of the M&E analysis?
How will the data be analyzed? Who will be doing the
analysis? What do we know about our baseline data?
How will the process be managed? And by whom?
An organizational assessment is needed…in order to
establish a process for M&E!
Source: https://sites.google.com/site/newmediacommunications2010/mobiles-and-m-e/2-case-studies
5. ASSESSMENT OF READINESS
In order for the M&E Function to
succeed, it is necessary to meet two major
conditions:
!
▪ Organizational readiness
– Is there a clear M&E framework with
targets?
– Is the planning process evidence-based?
– Is the TT focused on achieving results
(leadership, communications)
!
▪ Technical readiness
- Do the staff have the relevant experience
and skills?
WORKSHEET
6. What do we monitor?
Inputs. Activities. RESULTS.
WORKSHEET
7. Results chain
Resources Processes
Within control of the organization Partial Org. Control No Org. Control
Sphere of Control: Advocacy, Tactics,
Inputs, Activities, Outputs
Sphere of Influence:
Changes in behavior,
relationships,
attitudes, agenda
Sphere of
Concern: Policy
& Political
Context
WORKSHEET
WORKSHEET
10. Strategies & approaches for identifying
evidence of change
• Signposts
– output log, web analytics, media tracking, citation
tracking
– discourse analysis, social network analysis
• Outcome (or influence) log
– record of interactions with decision-makers, anecdotes
shared by stakeholders (e.g. with the director)
• Feedback mechanisms
– stakeholder surveys
– interviews
– focus group discussions
WORKSHEET
11. Integrated Learning Processes in M&E - Illustration
jan marfeb apr sep novoct decmay julyjune aug
Quarterly
report
Half-yearly & yearly
report
WORKSHEET
14. “If you do what you always did,
you will get what you always got.”
Kenneth W. Jenkins
President, Yonkers NY NAACP
TO THINK OR NOT TO THINK ABOUT M&E?
FOOD FOR THOUGHT…
15. The first step in performance accountability is to
DRAW A FENCE
Around something that has
ORGANIZATIONAL OR FUNCTIONAL IDENTITY
The Whole
Organization
Division A
Division B
Unit
Division C
Function
Unit 1
WORKSHEET
16. HOW DO WE THINK ABOUT
WHO, WHAT & WHY WE
MEASURE?
17. Different Kinds of Progress
1. Data
a. Population indicators Actual turned curves:
movement for the better away from the baseline.
b. Program performance measures:
customer progress and better service:
How much did we do?
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
2. Accomplishments: Positive activities, not included above.
3. Stories behind the statistics that show how individuals are
better off.
18. What’s Next?
A Basic Action Plan for Results Accountability
TRACK 1: POPULATION ACCOUNTABILITY
● Establish results
● Establish indicators, baselines and charts on the wall
● Create an indicators report card
● Set tables (action groups) to turn curves
TRACK 2: PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY
● Performance measures, and charts on the wall
for programs, agencies and service systems
● Use 7 Questions supervisor by supervisor and program by
program in management, budgeting and strategic planning
20. If I can…. Measure, Track, Improve & Show Performance
Education Performance Accountability
What’s in it for me?
Then…. here’s what’s in it for me:
! Improvement = more money
! Success at the State’s Accountability Game
! Student and Parent Satisfaction
! Tool vs. fingers crossed
! Knowing where your students are between
achievement tests
! Knowing that you’ve made a difference
24. Turn the Curve Exercise: Program Performance
5 min: Starting Points
- timekeeper and reporter
- identify a program to work on
- two hats (yours plus partner’s)
10 min: Performance measure baseline
- choose 1 measure to work on – from the lower right quadrant
- forecast – OK or not OK?
15 min: Story behind the baseline
- causes/forces at work
- information & research agenda part 1 - causes
15 min: What works? (What would it take?)
- what could work to do better?
- each partners contribution
- no-cost / low-cost ideas
- information & research agenda part 2 – what works
10 min: Report Convert notes to one page
Two pointers
to action
WORKSHEET
25. Program: _______________
Performance Measure
(Lay definition)
Performance
Measure
Baseline
Story behind the baseline
---------------------------
--------------------------- (List as many as needed)
Partners
---------------------------
--------------------------- (List as many as needed)
Three Best Ideas – What Works
1. ---------------------------
2. ---------------------------
3. ---------No-cost / low-cost
ONE PAGE Turn the Curve Report: Performance
Sharp
Edges
4. --------- Off the Wall
4. --------- Off the Wall
WORKSHEET
26. 2 customers
1 measure
1 measure
Discuss how
we’re doing
2 partners
2 what works
ideas (1 nc/lc)
Discuss how
to implement
20 Minute
Exercise
40
WORKSHEET
27. 1 population
1 result
1 indicator
Discuss how
we’re doing
2 partners
2 what works
ideas (1 nc/lc)
Discuss how
to implement
20 Minute
Exercise
1. What population are we concerned about?
(e.g. U.S. population)
2. What condition(s) do we want for this
population? (Americans are free of cancer.)
3. How could we measure these conditions? (
(e.g. cancer rates)
4. How are we doing on the most important
of these measures? (baseline history)
5. Who are the partners with a role to play
in doing better?
6. What works – what would it take – to do
better? (What is our role?)
7. What do we propose to do?
POPULATION ACCOUNTABILITY
WORKSHEET
28. Results Based Grantmaking Exercise
A. Result _________________________
B. Indicators
1. _______________
2. _______________
3. _______________
For each:
Getting Better Getting Worse
or About the Same?
C. Story behind the baselines (Why better or worse?)
__________ __________
__________ __________
D. Partners with a role to play
__________ __________
__________ __________
E. What would it take? (5 most important strategies)
1. _____________ 4. ______________
2. _____________ 5. ______________
3. _____________
F. Our Roles (3 best ideas)
1. __________________ 3. _________________
2. __________________ Off the wall:. _________
10 min:
10 min:
10 min:
15 min:
10 min:
WORKSHEET
30. ● # of people served
● % participants who got jobs
● staff turnover rate
● # participants who got jobs
●% of children reading at grade level
● cost per unit of service
● # applications processed
● % patients who fully recover
What Kind of PERFORMANCE MEASURE?
Upper Left
Lower Right
Upper Right
Lower Left
Lower Right
Upper Left
Upper Left
Lower Right
QUANTITY
!
!
How much did
we do?
QUALITY
!
!
How well did
we do?
E
F
O
R
T
E
F
E
C
T
Is anyone better off?
WORKSHEET
31. How much did we do?
Professional Development
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
EffectEffort
Customers
# teachers served
# students
# parents
Activities
# training sessions
# hours of training
# study groups
# TA contacts
# mentoring relationships
Common measures
% teachers certified in subjects they teach
% customers satisfied with how service is
delivered
% staff with good morale
Unit cost per training unit (HL #3)
Activity specific measures
% positive evaluations on training
% attendance in study groups
% of faculty participating in study groups
% mentoring pairs who complete mo. rept.
% mentees satisfied with match
#
#
!
#
#
!
#
!
#
#
#
% teachers satisfied that prof dev helped
them be a better teacher (DDA #2)
% teacher retention rate
- total
- “quality” teachers (DDA #1)
% mentees who report relationship
helped build their skills
% teachers who demonstrate new skills
- by observation (HL #2)
- by self report
% students in “trained” classrooms with
improved test scores (HL #1)
% students with reduced behavior
problems
% students with good school attendance
% teachers who report better use of time
SAMPLE
WORKSHEET
32. How much did we do?
Professional Development
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
EffectEffort Number of students &
teachers served
!
Number of workshops
Unit cost
!
% of teachers with PD
plan
# teachers who used training (by
self rept or observation)
!
# Teachers retained
!
# Achievement in classroom with
trained teachers
% teachers who used training (by
self rept or observation)
Teacher retention rate
!
Achievement rates in classroom
with trained teachers
33. How much did we do?
Environment: Water Quality
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
EffectEffort
Number of
stream stations
monitored
Average sites
per monitor
per month
Number miles
of healthy
streams
Percent miles
of healthy
streams
34. How much did we do?
Commerce Tourism
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
EffectEffort Number of
books sent to
interested
consumers
Cost per
inquiry
delivered
Number of
tourists
Number tourist
businesses
Tourism
market share
Growth in
tourist industry
35. How much did we do?
Personnel Department
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
EffectEffort
Number of
Applicants
Processed
Average
Recruitment
Period
Workforce
New Hires
Workforce
Turnover Rate
(non-promotions)
Customer
Satisfaction
36. How much did we do?
Every Program
(Financial Performance Measures)
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
EffectEffort
Cost
(total)
Unit
Cost
Benefit Value
(total)
Cost-Benefit
(ratio)
37. How much did we do?
Corrections
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
EffectEffort
# Inmates Rate of
overcrowding
#
Recidivism
%
Recidivism
38. How much did we do?
Blank
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
EffectEffort
X X
X X
41. More Resources
M&E Online Tools
!
ALT METRICS
http://www.researchtoaction.org/2013/09/how-to-harness-the-power-of-altmetrics-a-researchers-guide/
http://www.researchtoaction.org/2013/08/altmetrics-and-the-global-south-increasing-research-visibility/
!
USING GOOGLE TO TRACK AND IMPROVE YOUR RESEARCH IMPACT
http://www.researchtoaction.org/2013/08/using-google-to-track-and-improve-your-research-impact/
http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/2878#.U8VcXl7yDwJ
!
GOOGLE ANALYTICS
http://www.researchtoaction.org/2013/11/key-indicators-for-google-analytics/
http://www.google.com/analytics/
!
HOW TO GET STARTED WITH GOOGLE ANALYTICS
http://mashable.com/2011/05/23/how-to-use-google-analytics/
!
M&E in Theory and Action
!
MONITORING & EVALUATION: SOME TOOLS, METHODS & APPROACHES
http://gametlibrary.worldbank.org/FILES/215_M&E%20Guidelines%20on%20Indicators%20and%20Data%20Sources.pdf
!
THEORY OF CHANGE VS. LOG FRAMES
http://www.researchtoaction.org/2012/05/theory-of-change-vs-logframes/
http://www.knowledgebrokersforum.org/wiki/item/theory-of-change-vs-logframes
http://mande4mfi.wordpress.com/category/theory-of-change/
!
CASE STUDIES ON M&E
https://sites.google.com/site/newmediacommunications2010/mobiles-and-m-e/2-case-studies
!
EXAMPLES OF PROGRAM OUTCOMES
www.whatworks.org
EVALUATION PLANS
http://nonprofitanswerguide.org/faq/evaluation/what-is-an-evaluation-plan-and-why-create-one/
43. For further inquiries, please
contact:
Dr. Modupe Adefeso-Olateju, mo.olateju@tepcentre.com
Rebecca O. Doherty, doherty.rebecca@gmail.com
THANK YOU