When an Agile situation is routine, you may not be able to tell the difference between a novice and an expert. It's really only in the unanticipated, more challenging situations where we see an expert's superior capability. Agile experts think differently than novices about situations which is what allows them to adapt. If we accept this, then how can we help non-experts to think like experts?
9. Superficial What equation do I use?
Semantic The equation indicates that d is
independent of mass
Qualitative Just shoot the apple, the
arrow will fall at the same rate
10. Effective tactical leaders think
differently about situations than
ineffective ones
“What are their interests?” “They’re all out to get me!”
11. Think Like a Commander
Run students through very difficult
scenarios to expose and correct
weaknesses in their thinking
processes
12. Classroom study
(basic concepts)
Think Like a Commander
(expose weakness)
Full-scale simulation
(exercise strengths)
14. Thinker:
Respond to the scenario using
think-aloud
Scribe (1 or more):
Capture the thoughts; remind
Thinker to think-aloud
15. Think Aloud Protocol
• Describe what you are thinking, feeling,
noticing, questioning so that the Scribe
can capture it
• What do you notice? want? suspect?
• What questions do you have?
• What actions would you take?
• What else is passing through your head?
16. But if you were thinking aloud, we
can see that you didn’t think of
that and didn’t consider it
17. Warning! Scenarios may will be
more unfair than reality
• No body language to read
• No other background available
• Not allowed to ask for clarification
(you can actually ask, but I likely
won’t clarify)
18. Too easy! Too hard!
Can’t learn Can’t learn
Maximum learning
(via failures)
20. Think Aloud Protocol Template
• Describe what you are thinking, feeling,
noticing, questioning so that the Scribe
can capture it
• What do you notice? want? suspect?
• What questions do you have?
• What actions would you take?
• What else is passing through your head?
22. Assess the response
• What did you like about how the Thinker responded? What were
the strengths in his / her response?
• What did you not like about how the Thinker responded? What
were the weaknesses in his / her response?
23. More questions
• Did you consider higher intent? What is the overall purpose?
• Did you consider all the stakeholders and their interests?
• Did you consider effects of organisational structure?
• Did you consider what resources were available? What might
already be working that could be leveraged?
• Did you consider timing?
• Did you consider how the issues in the scenario might fit into the
bigger picture?
• Did you consider risks, mitigation, contingencies?
27. Cognitive themes
• Keep focus on higher intent
• Understand stakeholder interests
• Consider effects of organisational structure
• Consider and use all resources available
• Include considerations of timing
• Consider how the current situation fits into the bigger
picture
• Consider risks, mitigation, and contingencies
30. Assess the response
• What did you like about how the Thinker responded? What were
the strengths in his / her response?
• What did you not like about how the Thinker responded? What
were the weaknesses in his / her response?
31. More questions
• Did you consider higher intent? What is the overall purpose?
• Did you consider all the stakeholders and their interests?
• Did you consider effects of organisational structure?
• Did you consider what resources were available? What might
already be working that could be leveraged?
• Did you consider timing?
• Did you consider how the issues in the scenario might fit into the
bigger picture?
• Did you consider risks, mitigation, contingencies?