The UMUC Graduate School COMBINED Rubric for Assessing Critical Thinking, Information Literacy, Written Communication and Technology Fluency Introduction: This rubric was developed from research conducted in UMUC’s Graduate School. The rubric articulates fundamental criteria for each Student Learning Expectation (SLE) with performance descriptors demonstrating progressively more sophisticated levels of attainment. The rubric is intended for program-level use in evaluating and discussing student learning, not for grading. This rubric is designed to be trans-disciplinary and is designed for use with the UMUC Graduate School’s Common Activity. Definitions: Critical Thinking (THIN) - Demonstrate the use of analytical skills and reflective processing of information. Information Literacy (INFO) - Demonstrate the ability to use libraries and other information resources to effectively locate, select, and evaluate needed information. Written Communication (COMM) - Produce writing that meets expectations for format, organization, content, purpose, and audience. Technology Fluency (TECH) - Demonstrate an understanding of information technology broad enough to apply technology productively to academic studies, work, and everyday life. Glossary: The definitions that follow were developed to clarify terms and concepts used in this rubric only. • Assumptions: Ideas, conditions, or beliefs (often implicit or unstated) that are taken for granted or accepted as true. • Context: The historical, ethical, political, cultural, environmental, or circumstantial settings or conditions that influence and complicate the consideration of any issues, idea and actions. • Analysis: The process of breaking something into its parts and putting the parts back together to better understand the whole. It involves exposing underlying assumptions that inform ideas/issues and actions and such strategies as comparing and contrasting, looking at similarities and differences, and examining causes and effects. • Synthesis: Brings together all opinions and research in support of analysis or informed action. It involves integrating (combining) the relevant ideas, facts and research with one’s own opinions and conclusions into a new whole. • Consequences/Implications: The effects, results, or outcomes that would naturally or logically occur as the result of ideas or actions (as revealed in foregoing analysis and synthesis). Criteria Applications: · Conceptualization/Main Ideas - are expected to be presented early in the writing, include the main idea, issue, assumption or action, and indicate the direction the writer will take in his/her thinking. · Analysis – will clearly show some of the strategies described in the definition above. · Integration/Support– clearly brings together analysis and research to move toward the conclusions. · Conclusions/Recommendations – go beyond a simple summary of the ideas and research presented in the paper, and includes forward ...