There is a medical complaint never seen in any medical journal-a consequence of traumas created by doctors-specifically psychiatry.

1. THE PAEDOPHILES AND
THE PSYCHIATRISTS
STORIES OF MEDICAL ABUSE
BY STANLEY WILKIN

2. AUTHOR OF :
• THE DANGEROUS ROOTS OF PSYCHIATRY
• THE CULTURAL CONSTRUCTION OF MADNESS

3. KNOWING
ABUSE HAS
HAPPENED
• One of my jobs, amongst others, is to aid those
suffering from an uncatalogued condition, which is
never likely to be diagnosed by NHS doctors, and is
one ignored entirely by mental health professionals
everywhere. Usually I provide my services free over
the phone or through Skype.
• What is this condition, which affects millions?
• It is the devastating consequences of psychiatric
abuse. You may have been affected by this
phenomenon yourself but not recognised it as such.
You may have been proscribed drugs for stress or
depression and have suffered un-acknowledged side
effects, panic attacks or anxiety, or unknowingly
become severely drug addicted with dire future
consequences.

4. ACCEPTING
ABUSE………………
……….
• Most of you reading this would have experienced
such abuse. you may simply be unaware of it, your
understanding cloaked by too much faith in the
medical profession as a whole.
• This piece will contain a number of narratives, told
to me directly or indirectly. The main story of the
title to this piece will form the last section.

5. A GIRL’S BRAIN
DESTROYED!
•

6. • Well, not quite, but for those amongst you who believe
that psychiatry is a genuine science, think again!
• Let’s begin with one story, which in fact I have read about rather than witnessed
that concerns doctors operating outside the law and being allowed to do so.
• This happened 50 years ago and concerned a world famous psychiatrist, a mother
and his patient the young daughter.

7. • The mother brought her daughter of maybe 14 or 16 to the renowned doctor
claiming she was mentally ill. She was in a relationship with a boy against her
mother’s wishes, a boy whom the girl claimed she loved.
• In those days children did not have the rights, including the rights to be heard
and listened to, they do now. A child of 16 was under the authority of the parent.

8. • The doctor believing the mother’s controlling assertions took on the girl as his
patient and without the girl’s permission gave her electro-convulsive-treatment-
that is sent powerful electric currents through her brain. She consequently lost
most of her memories.
• This commonly occurred, but doctor’s appeared not to be overly concerned!
• Over the years the girl retrieved some of her memories, eventually recognising
her boyfriend, whom later she married. To all intents and purposes the girl’s life
was ruined, and she certainly never fulfilled her potential.

9. • This kind of behaviour occurred frequently in Soviet Russia at the time and in
other dictatorships around the world. The treatments and behaviour of medical
authorities throughout the 1950–60s reflected the treatment given to dissidents
in the above states. I knew a student who was politically active at that time, who
causing problems in his university, was told to leave the university, thus not
taking his degree, or enter an asylum for treatment. He chose the latter, staying
there for a month. Doctors were more than happy to engage in this kind of social
control.

10. Q) ASK
YOURSELF.
• Should the renowned doctor been charged and punished?
After all, he abused a child and caused that child irreparable
damage.
• Answer_Doctors are part of the state like justices and police
with rights over the ordinary population. If a psychiatrist
says someone is mentally ill and requires treatment by and
large they are believed.
• But yes, he should have been charged. Unfortunately, they
never are and such abuse as outlined above continues in
some form or another today. The state, as well as most
people, poorly informed unfortunately, trust and believe
doctors with a conviction that is almost religious.

11. • I have read other commentators explicate excuses for the renowned doctor’s
behaviour, suggesting his own uncontrollable bouts of depression lead to him to
employ extreme measures on others. It was empathy not criminality that drove
him! Fine, well some serial killers employ similarly bizarre reasoning. Let me
provide alternative insights below:
• He was unaccountable-he could do to others whatever he saw fit.
• He was not challenged by lay-men or his fellow doctors.

13. GOOD DOCTOR,
OR BAD
DOCTOR?
• The relationship doctors have with their patients
involves severe power imbalances-what they say
goes, their views are paramount at all times. They
often behave like lords in some poorly produced
film on medieval life, with the rest of us merely
annoying commoners.
• His acceptance of the mother’s story demonstrated
ignorance of day to day psychology and of how
appalling people can behave in order to retain
control.

14. • He failed to properly interview the patient, discover an alternative narrative to the
mother’s, demonstrating thereby high-handedness, indifference or stupidity.
• He took no responsibility for his actions, demonstrating the psycho-pathological
attitudes and behaviour of many senior doctors

15. DOMINANCE
OF
PROFESSIONAL
OPINION.
• If you enter any facility run by mental health
professions of any discipline, the world changes. It
is a different world from the one you left-an
alternative world. It is a world fashioned by mental
health ideologies in which mental health workers
define reality. You could be a great scientist, writer
or thinker, but that matters not a jot. In these
environs, the lowest mental health worker’s sense
of reality holds sway.

16. LET’S LOOK AT
ANOTHER
CASE,
SOMEWHAT
DIFFERENT
FROM THE
PREVIOUS ONE
.
• A man attempting to acquire rights, for that is what
it was and is, for and over his son, for the clear
benefit of his son. His ex-partner had gone back to
her previous boyfriend and they intended to bring
the boy up as their own. The mother accordingly
made accusations as to the real father’s stability,
although both had been at one time addicted to
tranquillisers. My client had recently lectured in
hospitals and run a Mental Health Charity.
• .
•

17. • First they saw a leading social worker-who made a judgement on the father based
on a few meetings and through a highly subjective prism. She had no genuine
knowledge of human psychology but consulted notes. She did not allow the
father to read and review her assessment, thereby correcting, her conclusions. As
an ‘expert’ her view dominated.

18. • My client had to see his son at various supervised meeting places. He was seen as
the problem even though he merely met his son and played with him-merely
loved him. He avoided the mother, who correctly as it turned out, he regarded as
controlling and manipulative. Given previous behaviour on her part, he believed
the mother would misrepresent his actions if he attempted to discuss the child
with her or approached her in any way. This was not an ill-founded fear.

19. • The child, like my client but unlike the mother and her boyfriend, showed early
intelligence. Eventually they ended up in a highly regarded children’s centre
where officially my client was reviewed as ‘having problems’. Most of the
information on his ‘problems’ came from the mother although the social worker,
without any formal training in human psychology and largely egged on by the
mother, had also encouraged that view. The energy of the senior staff went
towards helping him with his (completely imaginary) problems and were thereby
purposely distracted from the mother’s behaviour and more genuine ‘problems’.

20. • The children’s centre was presided over by two workers, a woman who was
training to be a social worker, and a man, a senior social worker. While they
treated the parents with custody well, the other parents, according to my client,
were ordered around and treated like criminals. Frightened of losing their
children, they allowed themselves to be treated in this despicable fashion.

21. • The staff took the view that he needed to speak to the mother, a commonly
propounded piece of pseudo-wisdom found in Agony Aunt columns. He
informed me that he did not consider this wise, given the mother’s behaviour in
the past, and that he was anyway only interested in building a relationship with
his son. In his own judgement, he was taking the most appropriate action.

22. •You do not disagree with a social
worker working in any area, let alone
mental health. If you do, you will be
diagnosed with a personality
disorder!

23. • My client realised that the mother and senior worker were co-operating as he
constantly saw them discussing matters, and once overheard them discussing
him. Both he and I were appalled by this collusion. The senior worker was
involving the mother in treatment of the father, considered necessary through her
unreliable testimony.

24. • Although my client did not discuss his views, because of their attitude, with the
staff he developed a reputation for having problems for which he required
treatment. One of the senior staff attempted unasked for analysis on him, which
he defended with sarcasm and ridicule.

25. • The mother appears to have fed the senior worker a series of lies on the father’s
behaviour, giving it appears the false idea that he was stalking/annoying her. The
senior worker did not ask my client if any of it was true, just simply accepted it.
Nor did the senior worker check any of the mother’s facts out.
• The senior worker then began abusing the father-calling him names, accusing
him of being a monster and other choice epithets. My client went to his MP, an
acquaintance of his who knowing my client well intervened.

26. • The senior worker’s judgement on my client was made from innuendo and
anecdote. His report (these reports are extremely dangerous as they carry with
them the weight of truth-rather than professional subjectivity) on my client
insisted he was ego-centred-a non-diagnosis pretending to be an actual one.
From my client’s testimony, the senior worker came across as a remarkably
egotistic man who considered that whatever he thought, said or believed
contained all the power of truth. Pot calling the kettle black, or simply projection?

27. • 1) Judgements on mental health are subject to prejudice not science.
• 2) Professional mental health workers construct their own reality from anecdotal
evidence or simply prejudice.
• 3) Professional mental health workers operate within a bullying framework.
• 4) A professional believes only a fellow professionals insight is authentic.
• 5) They all engage in the construction of alternative realities.

28. • 6) Victims are far more likely to be judged mentally ill than aggressors as
professionals tend to be aggressors themselves and it is easier to deal with one
person, usually the one lacking in confidence, than several demanding people.
• 7) professionals scapegoat by employing mental health descriptions
• 8) Difficult people are silenced using mental health diagnosis.

29. • All the authorities my client dealt with blotted out that he had run a Mental
Health Charity, was chair of a local political party, and had lectured within
hospitals. Mental Health workers need to believe that the people they are
dealing with are beneath them, that the workers are the clever, insightful ones.
The information on his past achievements never once appeared in court, in files
on him, or during mediation. He was instead re-defined as mentally ill-a
category he strongly rejected.

30. • The diagnosis of ego-centred (actually a non-diagnosis couched in pseudo-
medical language) appears to have been based on my client’s refusal to accept
the expertise of the senior worker, whom my client, see above, considered
shockingly egotistic. It was also because Mental Health workers refuse to believe
that the people they deal with have minds of their own, have, in effect, their
own ideas and that these ideas are of equal merit to these. If a patient fails to
acquiesce to the therapists or doctors views, they are mad.

31. • Benzodiazepine addiction:
• In Great Britain in the 1980s there was widespread unemployment, largely due to
government policy of running down industries without replacing them with any
other forms of employment, and of diverting wealth to the well-off in the belief
that this would regenerate the economy. This social phenomenon was dealt with
by GPs over proscribing Benzodiazepine tranquillisers, such as Valium and
At least 3 million were addicted.

32. • The addictive power of the above drugs is said to be stronger than heroin and
cocaine. In a number of important ways, smothering the mind and limiting
thought for example, they work in the same way. From my professional
experience, they also cause major personality changes. Many lives were and are
consequently being ruined.

33. • In the following decades, sufferers took the matter to court, but their cases were
arbitrarily stopped by the new government of the time.
• In the present day, from 250,000 to a million (The Times: April 29 2017) are
similarly addicted. According to the newspaper, GPs were warned over 4 years
ago to stop proscribing these drugs willy-nilly. They have nevertheless continued
to do so.

34. • A senior social worker I know when young worked on a number of South
London estates and told me how on one 80% of out-of-work men, still then
traditionally the wage-earners, were diagnosed with anxiety and depression and
thereby addicted to tranquillisers.
• Such over-loading of drugs prevented riots, marches and criminal behaviour.
The drugged-up unemployed would not have able capable of making such a
fuss.

35. • The tendency then, and growing now, is to medicalise the results of social
problems rather than deal with the problems. In this fashion, GPs create and
ensure stasis.
• GPs are the largest drug-pushing group in the country, addicting millions. These
drugs do not even do the job their makers claim they do and may be one of the
leading causes of mental health!
•

36. • Tranquillisers are given to suppress the processes of anxiety, meaning that they
often suppress the memories that cause anxiety, leading to deeper anxiety that
boils over. It it like stopping the flow of a tap.
• One client told me of how on tranquillisers, when stressed, he would shake
uncontrollably and suffer amnesia. As a consequence, he couldn’t work long
without being asked to leave.
• Another client spoke of 20 years of being in a dream, with limited cognition and
feelings.

37. PAEDOPHILES
AND
PSYCHIATRISTS:
• There was clearly something wrong as while only
5 years old he was caught several times playing
with his penis in class. No suspicions were aroused
of course and the incidences were quickly
dismissed and forgotten. At that point in time, his
relations with his parents remained good no
matter that they were interfering with him.
•

38. • All that soon changed. Over the years his father grew increasingly hostile to him,
intimidating and frightening. Over the years, he grew slowly, extremely frightened
of his home, shaking whenever he heard his father enter the house. It was not a
safe place to be!
• But matters grew worse!

39. • Between 9 and 12 his mother developed a blood-clot on her brain (as was it
seems later discovered) and begain exhibiting disturbed psychological behaviour.
As a consequence, or perhaps it would have happened anyway, she took her
young son to bed with her where he ran exploratory hands over her naked body.
This occurred many times until the father found out.
• When the boy was 10 the father had an affair and for a while the boy brightened
at the thought that his mother would kick him out of the home, as many betrayed
women did even back then. For the first and only time in his life he prayed. But
she never did, and the daily torments continued.

40. FATHER:
• My client recalled a trip by the family to Leicester
to see an old friend of his mother. While there, his
father pawed the poor woman, a devoicee, in
front of her children and in front of his own
children, touching her bum, bosom, and vagina.
She giggled but was surely mortified? That night
the poor woman asked my client’s mother to
sleep with her, no doubt terrified of the father. The
father was put in a bed with my client-who
couldn’t sleep the entire night, kept turning over
to look at his sleeping father in horror, rising at 5
am and waking up his brother who was in bed
with the family friend’s son.

41. • My client also remembered his father ridiculing a Down’s Syndrome child he saw
when they were on holiday.
• When the sister reached puberty the father would go into her bedroom with his
sons, expose her and permit the boys to feel her breasts.
• The father was addicted to pornography, keeping stashes around the house.
Often one or other of the children would find a magazine or book filled with
explicit material.

42. • Father:
• My client recalled a trip by the family to Leicester to see an old friend of his
mother. While there, his father pawed the poor woman, a devoicee, in front of
children and in front of his own children, touching her bum, bosom, and vagina.
She giggled but was surely mortified? That night the poor woman asked my
client’s mother to sleep with her, no doubt terrified of the father. The father was
put in a bed with my client-who couldn’t sleep the entire night, kept turning
to look at his sleeping father in horror, rising at 5 am and waking up his brother
who was in bed with the family friend’s son.

43. • My client also remembered his father ridiculing a Down’s Syndrome child he saw
when they were on holiday.
• When the sister reached puberty the father would go into her bedroom with his
sons, expose her and permit the boys to feel her breasts.
• The father was addicted to pornography, keeping stashes around the house.
Often one or other of the children would find a magazine or book filled with
explicit material.

44. FAMILY:
• The family disdained education, rarely read or were
remotely interested in books -except, see above,
pornography. There were hardly any books in the
house, and what books were there were for young
children. There was nothing remotely complex.
There was nothing remotely challenging. My client
resorted to the public library. If his father caught
him reading he would launch a verbal onslaught
on him. His siblings were similarly intellectually
limited.

45. ADOLESCENCE:
• My client became more intellectual, reading Dante, Freud, and Russell.
• From 13 to 16 he constantly sought for ways to escape his family. He researched
as to how he could run away and survive in London perhaps or some nearby
town. As he approached 16 he sought help from a variety of people, including a
priest. He left school in order to work to save enough money to leave.

46. • In fear of his father, in the end he turned to his family doctor. Why? On TV
doctors had been continuously shown as intelligent and understanding, and the
boy was desperate. He just wanted to get away from his father’s constant
bullying.

47. • The GP came, a junior member of a two-man surgery.
• The boy told him his hopes and fears, but could not, out of fear and mis-placed
loyalty, explain what his parents were doing and had been doing. The GP decided-or
possibly worse- he was mentally ill. As we now know Paedophiles function in
groups, was the GP one too?
• The GP sent a psychiatrist to see the boy who offered him a place in the local mental
hospital. Foolishly the boy saw this as a way out of his misery, not understanding the
truly appalling position he would soon be in.
•

48. • he GP came, a junior member of a two-man surgery.
• The boy told him his hopes and fears, but could not, out of fear and mis-placed
loyalty, explain what his parents were doing and had been doing. The GP
decided-or possibly worse- he was mentally ill. As we now know Paedophiles
function in groups, was the GP one too?

49. • The GP sent a psychiatrist to see the boy who offered him a place in the local
mental hospital. Foolishly the boy saw this as a way out of his misery, not
understanding the truly appalling position he would soon be in.

50. • Psychiatrists pathologise. Give them a patient, they will provide a diagnosis. They
see other people, but not themselves, as teeming with instabilities and personality
disorders. Anything that points to the unusual, anyone outside the norm, must be
suffering from one mental illness or another.
• Psychiatrists inhabit something of a fantasy world. They are unaccountable, their
diagnosis never challenged.

51. • Also, the boy’s diagnosis was the consequence of social prejudice. The boy’s
claims to erudition, his interest in writing and ambitions to write were seen as
clearly abnormal considering the family he came from. While in the hospital all
sorts of problems were assigned to him by one or another of the psychiatrists.
•

52. • On one occasion, he sat before a whole group of varied professionals, nurses,
doctors and social workers. According to his testimony he had no idea the danger
he was in. Everything he said, he considered to have been twisted from normal to
abnormal.
• Another psychiatrist he saw couldn’t speak English and misunderstood much of
what he said.
• Everything was written down unchallenged-every falsehood and mistake, filed
away and never challenged nor corrected. Written records play a huge part in the
process of solidifying psychiatric fantasy.

53. PARENTS:
• The parents’ opinions were sought-to psychiatrists
parents are/were solid, caring, trustworthy. They
did not abuse and if they did, it was the victims of
their abuse who were/are diagnosed. It is always
the victims, not the aggressors. They must have
been very frightened at first of being found out,
but no doubt were quickly relieved to discover
psychiatrists’ gullibility, even if this was constructed
from medical arrogance and lack of accountability.
What webs his parents must have spun! What lies
they must have told!

54. • The case was sewn up! The boy was mentally ill! Psychiatrists would have supplied
the reasons. Many years later, he told me, he found out that the doctors believed
his father’s affair had destabilised him. My client told me that he couldn’t stop
laughing at the idea. Ah, but as they never actually asked him what had
happened, what he thought and felt, fantasy was preferred.
• He was put on drugs.
• A month later, feeling defeated, he left the hospital and went back to his parents.
He had achieved nothing.

55. • Now he was officially mad, harbouring many imaginary problems, matters grew
worse. A few days after arriving back home, he began to feel strange. He became
excruciatingly affected by sunlight, unable to pass windows, often doubled up
with fear. He remembered one time seeing his father watching him. The boy knew
he was in immense trouble thrown back into the snakes’ pit, and overwhelmed by
strange thoughts and feelings.
•

57. • Hearing this, I realised my client had been affected by the drugs given to him in
hospital. As he talked of then experiencing black-outs and disturbed ramblings,
this confirmed it for me. After all, he was only 16.

58. • The effects of the drugs were seen by the doctors as further evidence of my
client’s mental illness. Doctors have no idea of the actual effects of their
drugs.
• Contrary to doctor’s protestations, they make no attempt to find out!

59. • The boy was from then on treated even worse by his family. They had been told
by psychiatrists after all, no doubt in technical language, that he was mad.
Perhaps they had told them he was psychotic, even though he had none of the
requisite symptoms. For psychiatrists that would be like confirming he had TB,
totally unware of any impact of such a diagnosis on my client or his life. He
remembers during the case interview being asked pertinent questions about
visual hallucinations, and he told them of one-which wasn’t really one. He was
after all only 16. Significantly, they did not ask about his family life or anything
that might possibly be pertinent.

60. • He realised then, as he still does now, that psychiatrists have little genuine
knowledge of the world, of the mind, and certainly possess little or no
psychological knowledge. They are taught an ABC approach to mental health
based upon lists.It is possible that the diagnosis in those lists are fantasy! Merely
fantasy!

61. • His family treated him appallingly, often as if he was cognitively impaired.
• At one point his parents tried to get him into a home for the educationally
subnormal.
• He returned several times to the hospital where he remembers being
continuously watched, and a record made every time he tried to write a poem or
story. Writing was for the doctors a form of mental illness! As no doubt was
any creative occupation!

62. • As a consequence of arrogant and ignorant psychiatrists, his relationship with his
family, parents and siblings, was destroyed. In effect, too, his future was
destroyed. No doubt, he was one of very many who suffered in this fashion.
Psychiatrists seem not to believe there is any consequences to their actions,
acting like doctors confronted with a physical illness who treat it without
necessarily needing to reference family and friends.
• Understandably, he was broken by these terrible experiences, and further
damaged by the drugs given to him.

63. • In this narrative, the Paedophiles, perhaps to their amazement, got away with
their crimes-I can assure you that this was merely one instance amongst an
unrecorded many!
• My role is to stop my client thinking of himself as a victim, see psychiatrists as
aggressors and abusers like his parents, and try and see private doctors only to
avoid the way ancient diagnosis continues to be relayed through patient’s notes
thereby causing him anxiety. I have to allow him to claim his talent again from
abusive professionals. Even now, many years later, he suffers sleepless nights,
struggles to get up in the morning and face the day, tends towards defensiveness
whenever he recalls what happened to him as a teenager.

64. ANECDOTES
• Another senior social worker of my
acquaintance-I know a few-told me that in her
experience different psychiatrists give different
diagnosis and advise on different treatments.
• A fellow teacher, yet another acquaintance, worked
in a Mental Hospital recently and in her view the
staff constructed a normal/abnormal dichotomy,
with themselves of course as normal. They needed
to view others as mentally ill to establish their own
balance.

65. • A client has for several years considered himself to be suffering from mental
illness-the nature of which seemed lost on me. I warned him not to go to his GP
but seek help elsewhere. He ignored me, went to his GP, was offered drugs and
his information sent out to local hospitals without his permission. He felt he was
being drawn into the role of mental patient and finally understood what I’d been
warning him against.
• He had put himself forward as a victim, ripe for manipulation.
•

66. •WARNING! WARNING! Psychiatric
drugs can cause personality
problems of a disturbing nature.

67. FINISH:
• This piece is not to dispute or demean mental
illness, although I believe as an idea it requires
evaluation as it the term, and the use of the term,
isolates ‘bad feelings’ from other feelings and fails
to acknowledge such feelings as part of the
human experience. No. This is an expose of the
medical professions role in dealing with the
matter, doctors complete lack of accountability,
the use of anecdotal evidence and the use of
diagnosis to further victimise those from
environments where they are already victims.

68. • Nowhere will you see psychiatric abuse categorised as a trauma, or set of
traumas, that requires alleviation. Nevertheless, my clients all continue to suffer
the effects of dealing with psychiatry.

69. ADD TO
ANECDOTES:
• swantst@gmail.com