The document summarizes the findings of an earthquake engineering field investigation team that assessed damage from the 2016 Mw7.8 Muisne earthquake in Ecuador. The team conducted surveys of structural damage, geotechnical aspects like landslides, and social impacts. For structures, they observed damage patterns in concrete, timber, and rural buildings. Data was collected using standardized damage scales. The team also collaborated with other organizations providing post-earthquake response.
Geo-information and remote sensing are proper tools to enhance functional strategies for increasing awareness on natural hazard prevention and for supporting research and operational activities devoted to disaster reduction.
Geo-information and remote sensing are proper tools to enhance functional strategies for increasing awareness on natural hazard prevention and for supporting research and operational activities devoted to disaster reduction.
The 2016 Ecuador earthquake occurred on April 16 at 18:58:37 ECT with a moment magnitude of 7.8 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of VIII (Severe). The very large thrust earthquake was centered approximately 27 km (17 mi) from the towns of Muisne and Pedernales in a sparsely populated part of the country, and 170 km (110 mi) from the capital Quito, where it was felt strongly. Regions of Manta, Pedernales and Portoviejo accounted for over 75 percent of total casualties.[6] Manta's central commercial shopping district Tarqui, was completely destroyed. Widespread damage was caused across Manabi province, with structures hundreds of kilometres from the epicenter collapsing. At least 659 people were killed and 27,732 people injured. President Rafael Correa declared a state of emergency; 13,500 military personnel and police officers were dispatched for recovery operations.
Dr Sean Wilkinson, Senior Lecturer in Structural Engineering, School of Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, UK visited SMART Infrastructure Facility on Thursday, 5 November 2015. During his visit, Dr Wilkinson presented a summary of his research as part of the SMART Seminar Series.
On April 16, 2016 a M7.8 struck along the subduction trench on western Ecuador near the town of Muisne in the province of Esmeraldas. The earthquake caused the collapse of hundreds of buildings some as far as Guayaquil, Ecuador’s largest city located 260 km southeast of the epicenter leading to 663 deaths, more than 27,000 injured and approximately 30,000 displaced residents living in public shelters. The largest death tolls occurred in the cities of Pedernales, Portoviejo and Manta where 82% of the casualties occurred.
The presentation summarizes the performance on bridges, dams, electrical substations, highways, ports, airports, buildings, etc.
The dynamic loads mainly derive from earthquakes, operation of heavy machinery, blasts, and wave or wind forces, etc. Common soil dynamics topics include the determination of dynamic earth pressures, the analysis and design of foundations under dynamic loads and dynamic soil-structure interaction problems. In civil engineering, earthquakes are the most common phenomena from which dynamic loads affect structures.
Understanding the dynamic behavior of soils is critical to prevent any structural or ground failure under earthquake loads. The properties that are needed to be determined to evaluate the dynamic behavior of soil are the following:
Dynamic Young’s modulus (E) and dynamic shear modulus (G) and their variation with shear strain (typically referred to as Shear Modulus Reduction curves)
Damping ratio (ξ) and its variation with shear strain (typically referred to as material damping curves)
Poisson’s ratio (ν)
Other parameters related to liquefaction (e.g. cyclic shearing stress ratio and cyclic deformation)
Geodetic and seismological analysis of the January 26th, 2014 Cephalonia Isla...Demitris Anastasiou
On January 26, 2014 a strong earthquake of magnitude Mw=5.8 occurred on Cephalonia Island followed by a similar magnitude earthquake Mw=5.7 one week later on February 3, 2014. Extensive structural damages, landslides and many damages on the islands' main roads, harbour and airport caused mainly on the western and central part of the island. The first event located 2km eastern of Lixouri town and was followed five hours later by a strong aftershock of magnitude Mw=5.3. The second strong earthquake located in the north part of Paliki eninsula North-East Cephalonia). Geodetic data of six permanent GNSS stations were available and analysed in this study both in pro and post seismic terms, using 30sec and 1Hz data where available. The time series analysis shows the effect of each event at nearby stations. Seismological data are used to determine the focal mechanisms of the earthquake sequence and an attempt to investigate the homogeneity of the mechanisms and the stress field of the area is presented in the study. Geodetic analysis and seismological results are used to understand the mechanism of the events.
The 2016 Ecuador earthquake occurred on April 16 at 18:58:37 ECT with a moment magnitude of 7.8 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of VIII (Severe). The very large thrust earthquake was centered approximately 27 km (17 mi) from the towns of Muisne and Pedernales in a sparsely populated part of the country, and 170 km (110 mi) from the capital Quito, where it was felt strongly. Regions of Manta, Pedernales and Portoviejo accounted for over 75 percent of total casualties.[6] Manta's central commercial shopping district Tarqui, was completely destroyed. Widespread damage was caused across Manabi province, with structures hundreds of kilometres from the epicenter collapsing. At least 659 people were killed and 27,732 people injured. President Rafael Correa declared a state of emergency; 13,500 military personnel and police officers were dispatched for recovery operations.
Dr Sean Wilkinson, Senior Lecturer in Structural Engineering, School of Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, UK visited SMART Infrastructure Facility on Thursday, 5 November 2015. During his visit, Dr Wilkinson presented a summary of his research as part of the SMART Seminar Series.
On April 16, 2016 a M7.8 struck along the subduction trench on western Ecuador near the town of Muisne in the province of Esmeraldas. The earthquake caused the collapse of hundreds of buildings some as far as Guayaquil, Ecuador’s largest city located 260 km southeast of the epicenter leading to 663 deaths, more than 27,000 injured and approximately 30,000 displaced residents living in public shelters. The largest death tolls occurred in the cities of Pedernales, Portoviejo and Manta where 82% of the casualties occurred.
The presentation summarizes the performance on bridges, dams, electrical substations, highways, ports, airports, buildings, etc.
The dynamic loads mainly derive from earthquakes, operation of heavy machinery, blasts, and wave or wind forces, etc. Common soil dynamics topics include the determination of dynamic earth pressures, the analysis and design of foundations under dynamic loads and dynamic soil-structure interaction problems. In civil engineering, earthquakes are the most common phenomena from which dynamic loads affect structures.
Understanding the dynamic behavior of soils is critical to prevent any structural or ground failure under earthquake loads. The properties that are needed to be determined to evaluate the dynamic behavior of soil are the following:
Dynamic Young’s modulus (E) and dynamic shear modulus (G) and their variation with shear strain (typically referred to as Shear Modulus Reduction curves)
Damping ratio (ξ) and its variation with shear strain (typically referred to as material damping curves)
Poisson’s ratio (ν)
Other parameters related to liquefaction (e.g. cyclic shearing stress ratio and cyclic deformation)
Geodetic and seismological analysis of the January 26th, 2014 Cephalonia Isla...Demitris Anastasiou
On January 26, 2014 a strong earthquake of magnitude Mw=5.8 occurred on Cephalonia Island followed by a similar magnitude earthquake Mw=5.7 one week later on February 3, 2014. Extensive structural damages, landslides and many damages on the islands' main roads, harbour and airport caused mainly on the western and central part of the island. The first event located 2km eastern of Lixouri town and was followed five hours later by a strong aftershock of magnitude Mw=5.3. The second strong earthquake located in the north part of Paliki eninsula North-East Cephalonia). Geodetic data of six permanent GNSS stations were available and analysed in this study both in pro and post seismic terms, using 30sec and 1Hz data where available. The time series analysis shows the effect of each event at nearby stations. Seismological data are used to determine the focal mechanisms of the earthquake sequence and an attempt to investigate the homogeneity of the mechanisms and the stress field of the area is presented in the study. Geodetic analysis and seismological results are used to understand the mechanism of the events.
Vulnerability to Resilience - BangladeshBayes Ahmed
Presentation on the progress of the Vulnerability to Resilience (V2R) project in Bangladesh at the British Red Cross, UK Office, 44 Moorfields London EC2Y 9AL.
Status and Perspectives of GIS Application in BANGLADESHBayes Ahmed
This is the final presentation of the course GIS Applications in Developing Countries. This course was a part of the Erasmus Mundus Master in Geospatial Technologies offered in Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU), Institute for Geoinformatics (ifgi), Münster, Germany.
Urban Land Cover Change Detection Analysis and Modelling Spatio-Temporal Grow...Bayes Ahmed
This is my final Mater thesis presentation. The thesis defense was held on March' 07, 2011 at 15:30 in the seminar room of Universitat Jaume I (UJI), Castellón, Spain.
WRI’s brand new “Food Service Playbook for Promoting Sustainable Food Choices” gives food service operators the very latest strategies for creating dining environments that empower consumers to choose sustainable, plant-rich dishes. This research builds off our first guide for food service, now with industry experience and insights from nearly 350 academic trials.
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024punit537210
Situated in Pondicherry, India, Kuddle Life Foundation is a charitable, non-profit and non-governmental organization (NGO) dedicated to improving the living standards of coastal communities and simultaneously placing a strong emphasis on the protection of marine ecosystems.
One of the key areas we work in is Artificial Reefs. This presentation captures our journey so far and our learnings. We hope you get as excited about marine conservation and artificial reefs as we are.
Please visit our website: https://kuddlelife.org
Our Instagram channel:
@kuddlelifefoundation
Our Linkedin Page:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/kuddlelifefoundation/
and write to us if you have any questions:
info@kuddlelife.org
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Venturesgreendigital
Willie Nelson is a name that resonates within the world of music and entertainment. Known for his unique voice, and masterful guitar skills. and an extraordinary career spanning several decades. Nelson has become a legend in the country music scene. But, his influence extends far beyond the realm of music. with ventures in acting, writing, activism, and business. This comprehensive article delves into Willie Nelson net worth. exploring the various facets of his career that have contributed to his large fortune.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Willie Nelson net worth is a testament to his enduring influence and success in many fields. Born on April 29, 1933, in Abbott, Texas. Nelson's journey from a humble beginning to becoming one of the most iconic figures in American music is nothing short of inspirational. His net worth, which estimated to be around $25 million as of 2024. reflects a career that is as diverse as it is prolific.
Early Life and Musical Beginnings
Humble Origins
Willie Hugh Nelson was born during the Great Depression. a time of significant economic hardship in the United States. Raised by his grandparents. Nelson found solace and inspiration in music from an early age. His grandmother taught him to play the guitar. setting the stage for what would become an illustrious career.
First Steps in Music
Nelson's initial foray into the music industry was fraught with challenges. He moved to Nashville, Tennessee, to pursue his dreams, but success did not come . Working as a songwriter, Nelson penned hits for other artists. which helped him gain a foothold in the competitive music scene. His songwriting skills contributed to his early earnings. laying the foundation for his net worth.
Rise to Stardom
Breakthrough Albums
The 1970s marked a turning point in Willie Nelson's career. His albums "Shotgun Willie" (1973), "Red Headed Stranger" (1975). and "Stardust" (1978) received critical acclaim and commercial success. These albums not only solidified his position in the country music genre. but also introduced his music to a broader audience. The success of these albums played a crucial role in boosting Willie Nelson net worth.
Iconic Songs
Willie Nelson net worth is also attributed to his extensive catalog of hit songs. Tracks like "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," "On the Road Again," and "Always on My Mind" have become timeless classics. These songs have not only earned Nelson large royalties but have also ensured his continued relevance in the music industry.
Acting and Film Career
Hollywood Ventures
In addition to his music career, Willie Nelson has also made a mark in Hollywood. His distinctive personality and on-screen presence have landed him roles in several films and television shows. Notable appearances include roles in "The Electric Horseman" (1979), "Honeysuckle Rose" (1980), and "Barbarosa" (1982). These acting gigs have added a significant amount to Willie Nelson net worth.
Television Appearances
Nelson's char
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...MMariSelvam4
The carbon cycle is a critical component of Earth's environmental system, governing the movement and transformation of carbon through various reservoirs, including the atmosphere, oceans, soil, and living organisms. This complex cycle involves several key processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, decomposition, and carbon sequestration, each contributing to the regulation of carbon levels on the planet.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion and deforestation, have significantly altered the natural carbon cycle, leading to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and driving climate change. Understanding the intricacies of the carbon cycle is essential for assessing the impacts of these changes and developing effective mitigation strategies.
By studying the carbon cycle, scientists can identify carbon sources and sinks, measure carbon fluxes, and predict future trends. This knowledge is crucial for crafting policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions, enhancing carbon storage, and promoting sustainable practices. The carbon cycle's interplay with climate systems, ecosystems, and human activities underscores its importance in maintaining a stable and healthy planet.
In-depth exploration of the carbon cycle reveals the delicate balance required to sustain life and the urgent need to address anthropogenic influences. Through research, education, and policy, we can work towards restoring equilibrium in the carbon cycle and ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come.
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptxsidjena70
A brief about organic farming/ Natural farming/ Zero budget natural farming/ Subash Palekar Natural farming which keeps us and environment safe and healthy. Next gen Agricultural practices of chemical free farming.
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdfJulietMogola
Many companies today use green washing to lure the public into thinking they are conserving the environment but in real sense they are doing more harm. There have been such several cases from very big companies here in Kenya and also globally. This ranges from various sectors from manufacturing and goes to consumer products. Educating people on greenwashing will enable people to make better choices based on their analysis and not on what they see on marketing sites.
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...Open Access Research Paper
The objective of this work is to contribute to valorization de Nephelium lappaceum by the characterization of kinetics of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum. The seeds were dehydrated until a constant mass respectively in a drying oven and a microwawe oven. The temperatures and the powers of drying are respectively: 50, 60 and 70°C and 140, 280 and 420 W. The results show that the curves of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum do not present a phase of constant kinetics. The coefficients of diffusion vary between 2.09.10-8 to 2.98. 10-8m-2/s in the interval of 50°C at 70°C and between 4.83×10-07 at 9.04×10-07 m-8/s for the powers going of 140 W with 420 W the relation between Arrhenius and a value of energy of activation of 16.49 kJ. mol-1 expressed the effect of the temperature on effective diffusivity.
The Mw7.8 Muisne Earthquake, Ecuador of 16 April 2016: Observations from the EEFIT Reconnaissance Mission
1. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
The Mw7.8 Muisne Earthquake,
Ecuador of 16 April 2016
Observations from the EEFIT
Reconnaissance Mission
Guillermo Franco
Harriette Stone
Bayes Ahmed
Siau Chen Chian
Fiona Hughes
Nina Jirouskova
Sebastian Kaminski
Jorge Lopez
With Manuel Querembas, Carlos Molina Hutt & Nicolas van Drunen
2. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Preliminaries
PART 1 Regional Seismology & Event Characterisation
PART 2 Geotechnical Aspects
PART 3 Structural Aspects
Introduction & description of the building stock
Qualitative overview of building damage
Structural damage survey analysis
The tagging process and its shortcomings
PART 4 Social Aspects
PART 5 Concluding Remarks
3. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Our Team & Our Roles
GUILLERMO
LEAD
HARRIETTE
STRUCT
BLOG
DEPUTY LEAD
SEBASTIAN
STRUCT
LOGISTICS
JORGE
STRUCT
NINA
GEOTECH
SEISMO
FIONA
GEOTECH
PHOTO
ARCHIVAL
DARREN
GEOTECH
SEISMO
REMOTE
SUPPORT
BAYES
SOCIAL
MANUEL
LOCAL LEAD
CARLOS
STRUCT
LOCAL
SUPPORT
NICOLAS
SOCIAL
STRUCT
LOCAL
SUPPORT
PRESENT
PART 3
PRESENT
PARTS 1-2
PRESENTS
PART 4
PRESENTS PART 3 -
TAGGING
PRESENTS INTRO
& PART 5
4. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
FIRST PUBLICATION FOR
WCEE16 AVAILABLE SINCE
JUNE 15 2016
• 7 days after returning from the field
• Shared with local authorities
• To be presented by Franco & Stone
Final report expected in October 2016
Publications
5. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Collaborations
• Armed Forces of Ecuador
• Designated a local lead to support the EEFIT Team (Major Manuel
Querembas, director of the Army School of Civil Engineering)
• Provided open access to all affected areas
• Supported team with a van, a boat, and additional logistics
• Arup
• Provided advance local information from their own deployment
• European Commission – Civil Protection Team
• Provided advance local information from their own deployment
6. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Mission
MANTA
PORTOVIEJO
CHONE
BAHIA DE
CARAQUEZ
CANOA
SAN
ISIDRO
JAMA
PEDERNALES
CHAMANGA
DATE ACTIVITY
APRIL 16 EVENT OCCURS
APRIL 22 LEAD IDENTIFED
MAY 5 TEAM IDENTIFIED
MAY 24-27 TEAM ARRIVES
MAY 28-30 MANTA
PORTOVIEJO
MAY 31 BAHIA
CANOA
JUNE 1 CANOA-JAMA
SAN ISIDRO
JUNE 2-3 PEDERNALES
JUNE 3-5 CHAMANGA
CANOA
CHONE
JUNE 5-9 MANTA
PORTOVIEJO
TEAM LEAVES
JUNE 15 WCEE16 PAPER
SUBMITTED
2 months “event-to-paper”
7. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Ecuadorian Context
• Ecuador has about 15m population, US$100b GDP, relatively high inequality
• Level of development similar (somewhat lower) to neighbours
• Manabi is the 3rd most populated region in the country
• Economic importance: shrimp farming, agriculture, and tourism
• Ecuador is suffering from low oil prices
• Recent rains and floods prior to earthquake
• Cliffs and mountains in rural areas and along roads
• Number of informal settlements constructed in hazardous areas
• A time of delicate political context between government and military
• Scarcity of mechanisms for financial response
• Earthquake occurs on a Saturday at around 7pm local time
• New building code introduced in 2014 for seismic design (NEC-15)
• Push for seismic risk preparedness within SARA project (mainly Quito)
• Prompt and effective response from the Armed Forces
ExacerbatingfactorsAttenuating
9. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Regional Tectonic Setting
Reyer (2008), after Getscher et al. (1999)
10. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Active Faults Map
Eguez (2003). USGS
Geomorphological and Fault System Analysis of the Manabi Region.
Reyes (2008)
Local Tectonic Activity
12. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Aftershocks
Hundreds of aftershocks recorded since main event, including many above 5Mw, such as:
Rate of aftershocks with elapsed days based
on modified Omori’s law
Number of aftershocks with earthquake magnitude
based on Gutenberg-Richter relationship
Aftershock Date Magnitude Area primarily
Impacted
Damage
18th of May
(just before the mission)
6.7 & 6.8Mw Manabi Loss of power; 1 killed;
dozen injured; landslides
10th of July
(about a month after the mission)
5.9 Mw & 6.4Mw Esmeraldas Loss of power and phone
service; damage to Bailey
bridge; 80 people displaced
13. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
After Singaucho et al. (2016) - Intituto Geofisico
~50s, 1.41g PGA
Dominant periods:
• Pedernales (APED): 0.2s and 0.7s
(falls within natural period of structures about
2-7 stories tall)
• Portoviejo (APO1): 0.4s
(4 stories tall)
• Manta (AMNT): 0.2s
(2 stories tall)
• Chone (ACHN): 1.3s
(>10 stories)
The April 16th Event
14. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Within Design?
PGA values in (g) YRP Manta Portoviejo Pedernales
Recorded
(16th of April, 2016, IG)
- 0.68 0.51 1.41
PSHA studies (results on rock sites)
Wong et al. (2012)
475 0.35 - -
2475 0.65 - -
Parra (2015)
475 0.7 0.6 0.65-0.7
2475 1.15 1 1.15
SARA (2015)
475 0.37-0.47
2475 0.7-0.9
Code 475 0.5
16. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Objectives & Methods
• Gather information on primary geological and geotechnical drivers for damage
• Observe geological and geotechnical vulnerability sources
• Survey geological and geotechnical failures
• Geophysical tests for soil amplification analysis
• Landslide survey in collaboration with the British Geological Survey (BGS)
• Liquefaction damage and other geotechnical failure observations
17. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Microtremor Tests
Why?
• Non-invasive, rapid and reliable methodology
to assess soil amplification effects
• Especially useful considering lack of geological
information
• Tested and compared successfully with other
shear-wave velocity measurements such as
MASW, SCPT and others (Pappin et al., 2012;
Tallett-Williams et al., 2015)
How?
• Ambient noise measurement
Reyes & Michaud (2012)
18. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Microtremor Tests
Methodology
• Nakamura (1989) H/V technique, whereby the ratio peaks at the lower limit of the
fundamental frequency of the site (Bard 1999)
• Vs,30 of the site can be determined with depth to first stratum
28. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Los Caras Bridge
Soil profile Courtesy of Ecuador’s Army Corps of Engineers and Adolfo
Caicedo. From personal communication with E. Morales.
Triple pendulum
seismic isolator
29. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Observations Summary
• Ground motion
• Event could have been expected;
• Site effects need further attention
• Limiting Z=0.5 factor in the code may be an issue
• Microtremor
• Analysis to be continued (see final report)
• Landslides
• Satellite imagery ground-truthing
• Slope angle
• Reinforcement
• Liquefaction
• Flooding
• Fill
• Drainage and slope reinforcement
Caution needed to not underestimate losses from geological/geotechnical failures
31. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Objectives & Methods
• Gather information on primary reasons for earthquake damage
• Survey levels of damage to different building typologies in the affected areas
• Initial reconnaissance walk-around
• RAPID & DETAILED visual survey
• Arup’s REDi rating system and GEM’s inventory capture tool
32. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Building Stock
• Concrete buildings
• Timber buildings
• Quincha / Bahareque
• Others: Steel, Mixed Concrete / Timber / Steel
• Rural housing
33. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Concrete Buildings
Reinforced Concrete Frames with
Unreinforced Masonry Infill Walls
34. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Timber Buildings
• Timber Frames with and
without Unreinforced
Masonry Infill Walls
• Quincha / Bahareque
35. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Other
• Steel, Unreinforced Masonry, Bamboo, Mixed
• NB: No Adobe observed
36. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Rural Housing
• Non-engineered systems of various materials (i.e. Timber, Bamboo, RC, Masonry)
52. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Case Studies
• Case Study I: School in Pedernales
• Case Study II: Church in Canoa
• Case Study III: Footbridge in Canoa
60. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Damage Surveys
Why Collect Damage Data?
• To better understand the scale and spread of damage
• To better understand patterns of damage by typology, height, location, etc.
• To produce empirical fragility and vulnerability functions
• To validate analytical fragility and vulnerability functions
What are the Limitations in Collecting Damage Data?
• Demolition
• Outside inspection only
• Lesser-damaged buildings
• Relatively small numbers
• Surveyor accuracy
68. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
RC Timber Other Unknown
No.ofbuildings
Building group
Damage surveyed throughout affected region
0 1 2 3 4 5 D
Damage Survey Results
69. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
RC Timber RC Timber RC Timber RC Timber RC Timber
Pedernales (1.07g) Jama (est. 0.75g) Bahia (est. 0.5g) Manta (0.46g) Portoviejo (0.34g)
EMS-98damagegrade(D=demolished)
Building location and type
Spread of damage over region by building type 0 1 2 3 4 5 D
Damage Survey Results
71. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
EU Civil Protection Mechanism
PREVENTION
Disaster prevention is possible by various ways such as creating an inventory of
information on disasters, sharing of best practices, reinforcing early warning tools etc.
PREPAREDNESS
Training programmes, exercises during simulated emergencies, exchange of expert's
programmes, cooperation projects to prepare communities and the general population.
RESPONSE
Assistance may include search and rescue teams, medical teams, shelter, water
purification units and other relief items requested.
Courtesy of Carlos Molina Hutt and the European Civil Protection Mission
COUNTRY REQUESTS
ASSISTANCE FOR
SPECIFIC NEEDS
EU REQUESTS SKILLS
IN MEMBER STATES
AND MATCHES WITH
NEEDS
IF COUNTRY ACCEPTS
PROPOSED TEAM, TEAM IS
DEPLOYED COORDINATING WITH
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
72. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
EU Civil Protection Team
Base of Operations: Portoviejo (Arrived April 24)
Activities
• Supported the Ecuadorian Government
• Adapted assessment methodology to Ecuadorian context
• Facilitating the task assignment to other teams
• Knowledge Transfer
Courtesy of Carlos Molina Hutt and the European Civil Protection Mission
73. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Structural Assessment Work
• Rapid Post-Earthquake Safety Evaluations (Adapted ATC-20)
• Detailed Post-Earthquake Safety Evaluations (Adapted ATC-20)
• Demolition Verification (due to unnecessary demolition taking place)
• Safe Road Access (to re-open the arteries of Ground Zero)
Courtesy of Carlos Molina Hutt and the European Civil Protection Mission
74. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Main Contributions
PORTOVIEJO
• 551 buildings assessed
• 188 green
• 189 yellow
• 174 red
• 5 km of safe access roads
Courtesy of Carlos Molina Hutt and the European Civil Protection Mission
76. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Objectives & Methods
• Conduct qualitative observations
on the shelter situation
• Conduct preliminary interviews
• Design a questionnaire on site
adapted to the local situation
• Obtain questionnaire responses
• Total of 120 families surveyed
PORTOVIEJO
CANOA
PEDERNALES
93. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Outreach - Press
• Met with President Rafael Correa and its cabinet
• Met the Army highest command, General Mosquera
• Interviews published in major TV channels and newspapers
www.teleamazonas.com/2016/06/ingleses-analizan-suelo-zona-cero-manta-portoviejo/
94. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Outreach - Blog
• 21 Posts (≈ 2/day avg)
• 2,100+ Views
• 493 Visitors
• 247 Visitors on June 2
https://eefitmission.wordpress.com/
95. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Mission Tangible Outcomes
• Collected thousands of photos
• Conducted about 10 drone flights
• Surveyed more than 1,000 buildings
• Designed a questionnaire in-situ for social research
• Filled out questionnaires from 120 families
• 1 Paper published within 2 months of the event
• About 30 Tromino measurements
• About 15 landslides surveyed for the BGS – Successful ground-truthing exercise
• Successful outreach and connection to local authorities and press
• Successful training and experience for the entire EEFIT team
96. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
Concluding Remarks
Salient Observations
• The high water saturation due to recent rains and floods exacerbated
geotechnical failures of buildings and contributed to trigger landslides
• The resonant period of ground motion seems to correlate well with the resonant
period of the affected building stock
• Shortcomings in construction typical of poor seismic design and typical of non-
engineered construction were pervasive
• Satellite imagery was used to identify landslides but special considerations have
to be taken into account to calibrate image recognition algorithms
• The Los Caras Bridge experience should incentivise debate as to the business
case for seismic isolation, despite perceived costs in developing contexts
• The tagging process deserves more attention and coordination –clear
communication as to the meaning of tags can prevent unnecessary loss
• Better communication of risks is a constant necessity
Additional Aspects to Consider
• Event Response & Financial Aspects
97. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team
We received enormous and generous support from many local experts. Without them, the mission would not have been
as successful as it was: Ing. Marcelo Romo (Escuela Politécnica del Ejército), Archs. Jean Paul Demera and Nguyen
Ernesto Baca (Historical Preservation), Milton Cedeño (ULEAM), Paulina Soria (INBAR-International Network for Bamboo
and Ratan), Christian Riofrio (AIMA), Gen. Mosquera, Crnl. De E.M.C. William Aragon, Col. Ramos, Col. Negrete, Col.
Parra, Lt. Col. Iturralde, Maj. De E. Henry Cordova (Secretaria de Gestión de Riesgos), Maj. Fabricio Godoy (ISSFA), and
Everth Luis Mera (student at the School of Civil Engineering of Portoviejo). During the mission, we received support from
our London-based colleagues, EEFIT coordinators Berenice Chan, Sean Wilkinson and Tristan Lloyd.
Prior, during and after the field mission, we received briefings and support from Carlos Molina (University College
London), Anna Pavan, Francisco Pavia, Matthew Free (Arup), Antonios Pomonis (Cambridge Architectural Research &
World Bank), Tom Dijkstra, Helen Reeves and Colm Jordan (British Geological Survey), James Daniell (Kahlsruhe
Institute of Technology and World Bank Group), Oscar Ishizawa and Rashmin Gunasekera (World Bank Group), Emilio
Franco (Gestió de Infraestructures SA, retired), Thomas Ferre (MicroVest Capital Management, LLC), Marjorie Greene
and Forrest Lanning (EERI), Eduardo Miranda (Stanford University), Enrique Morales (University of Buffalo), Mario Calixto
Ruiz Romero, Alexandra Alvarado and Pedro Espín (Instituto Geofísico), Lizzie Blaisdell (Build Change), Kevin Hagen
(EWB-USA), Diego Paredes (UK Embassy in Ecuador), Carla Muirragui (Cámara de Industrias y Producción), Sandra Silva,
Jenny Nino, Carolina Gallegos Anda, Natividad Garcia Troncoso (Imperial College), Alby Del Pilar Aguilar Pesantes
(ESPOL), Michael Davis, Luz Gutiérrez, and Santiago del Hierro.
The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) provided funding for team members Ahmed, Hughes,
and Jirouskova. The Centre for Urban Sustainability and Resilience at University College London provided funds for
Stone. Arup supported members Kaminski and López and also provided funding for vehicle hires. Guy Carpenter
supported team lead Franco. The Ecuador Army provided additional land and sea transportation to the team. This
financial support made the mission possible. EEFIT also receives regular financial sponsorship from Arup, CH2MHill, Mott
MacDonald, the British Geological Survey, AIR Worldwide, AECOM, Willis, Guy Carpenter, and Sellafield Ltd. All this
support is greatly appreciated.
Acknowledgments
Editor's Notes
Very few studies on active faulting in the region, though these EQs may have spurred revived efforts in that direction. Some of the observations, including San Isidro which Fiona will talk about may be utilised in validation efforts of the work by Eguez (2003). Reyes (2008) and others suggest that there may very well be currently unsuspected active faults in the region.
Time of earthquake: Saturday, 18:58 ECT (no school or work but in their house and some displaced people had to sleep outside in the rain.)
Rainy season / floods - After extremely high floods starting in January 2016 aggravated by El Nino (418 people evacuated in the province, 604 houses affected/destroyed).
Flooding was reported in at least seven cantons on 13 April, leaving people in need of water (Government 13/04/2016). Food security and livelihoods in Manabi have been affected by flooding and landslides. Cocoa and banana crops have been destroyed in April.
No formal earthquake emergency plan (however, plans in case of a volcanic eruption).
New Building Code in 2014, for seismic design (NEC-15) though Gap between Code and Practice and Limitations of the code some of which will be touched upon during the presentation.
Tensed political context (between the people, the government and between the army and civil forces). However, may also have been a stimuli for quick and efficient response to gain political capital from it.
Prompt response (though may have led to hastened demolition orders and controversial shelter options choices).
Instruments for financial response needs developing.
South American arc extending 7,000 km from southern coast of Panama in Central America to southern Chile.
Nazca plate subducts beneath the South America continent, creating the Andes Mountains and active volcanic chain.
Displaces at a rate of 65 mm/yr (north) to 80 m/yr (south).
Several large interplate earthquakes of magnitude 8 or greater have occurred (e.g. 1960 Mw 9.5 earthquake, the largest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the world; and 2010 Mw 8.8 earthquake) (USGS 2016).
Strong shallow intraplate earthquakes within the South American Plate along the Andes triggered landslides, subsidence, liquefaction and river impoundment (Espinosa 1979).
Mw 7.8 megathrust earthquake, at west coast of northern Ecuador, near the subducting Nazca-South America plate boundary. Occurred at 23:58 hours UTC at a depth of 19.2 km (USGS 2016).
Very few studies on active faulting in the region, though these EQs may have spurred revived efforts in that direction. Some of the observations, including San Isidro which Fiona will talk about may be utilised in validation efforts of the work by Eguez (2003). Reyes (2008) and others suggest that there may very well be currently unsuspected active faults in the region.
Ecuador has a history of large seismic events exceeding Mw7. The epicentre of the 2016 earthquake was located at the southern end of the 400-500km long rupture area of the 1906 Mw8.8 event which generated a tsunami that killed hundreds of people [1]. Closer to the 2016 epicentre, a Mw7.8 earthquake occurred in 1942, 43km south of the recent April event, and a Mw7.2 event in 1998 close to Bahía de Caráquez.
+ Add the Chlieh et al. (2014) figure
Since the main shock, hundreds of aftershocks have been recorded, including many events greater than Mw5, such as the Mw6.7 and 6.9 aftershock events on 18 May.
Rate of aftershock with elapsed days depicted well with modified Omori’s law, which describe that frequency of aftershocks decrease with reciprocal of time after mainshock.
Gutenberg-Richter relationship showed that the mainshock is significantly larger than the trend produced by the aftershocks.
Nevertheless, both figures indicate that empirical laws can capture broad characteristics of the aftershocks.
The likelihood of an important aftershock to occur whilst on the mission is hence significantly lower a month after the event. However, as the two examples show, they do occur even when the probability is low. Appropriate precautionary measures always need to be taken on the field.
Aftershocks also raise the issue of distinguishing observations associated to the main shock or the aftershocks. Talking to the people or comparing observations to satellite or other imagery from after the main shock are a couple of solutions to come about this problem.
-Geophysical Institute (Instituto Geofisico) registered ground shaking lasting about 50 seconds. Highest peak ground acceleration (PGA) recorded was 1.41g at station APED near Perdernales.
-PGA values lower in the north of the epicentre but with longer duration as compared to the south where higher PGAs are observed with a shorter duration of shaking. Further distance away from the epicentre, the PGA of the ground motion decreases
Portoviejo and Manta, high frequency content ; Chone long period motion
Comment on design spectra vs records
NB: at this hour, the site conditions at the recording stations are not known hence the spectra are checked against the design spectra for a range of site classes from B to E.
Accelerations much greater in pedernales than designed up to 1.25s (i.e. the structures which should have survived well are the >10story buildings). Near source effects? Vs Esmeraldas – directionality of the seismogenic rupture towards the south rather than the north
Relative adequacy for Chone and Manta as well, although peak at around 1.5s above the design spectrum which may be problematic for high (>10story heigh) buildings
+ in literature: higher PGA than expected in most studies in the region (though on rock sites).
Usefulness of tendency to provide and communicate PSHA results for rock conditions?
Oversimplificaion of the Z=0.5 cut-off factor in the manabi region, given the complexity of the tectonics there?
Tried to cover both urban areas as well as less developed areas (rural – san isidro, where significant damage occurred, or where the damage to infrastructure or economically significant lands was observed – slope failures along roads, or damage to shrimp farms embankments or facilities)
single, portable, digital seismometer, with tyically three orthogonal accelerometers and velocimeters which measure surface waves
Work to be continued. New geological information provided. See final report
Site effects need further attention to understand the ground motions which affected the structures at surface
Tend to underestimate the losses due to geotech’ failures. Eco losses are still mainly calculated based on structural damage. However, significant losses to shrimp farms, many informal settlements built on unstable ground often overlooked in loss calcs; difficulty as well to calculate impact of road transport disruption on eco losses.
Transition slide to introduce the three following parts of the presentation