SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The Historical Silk Roads, China and Islam
By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
The historical silk roads did not start with the beginning of History. However, when
we refer to the very existence of the silk roads and to the developments that were
unfolded because of them, we often forget that this remarkable affair that shaped the
World History is merely a continuation and a prolongation of the earlier existed
commercial roads that linked Central Asia, Siberia and India to Mesopotamia.
On the other hand, due to other early commercial roads, Mesopotamia was also
connected with the Caucasus region, Anatolia and the Balkans, and the Horn of
Africa. Last, since the Dawn of the Civilization, the Valley of the Twin Rivers was
densely linked with the Valley of the Nile, via the Syro-Phoenician – Palestinian
corridor.
I. The Historical Silk Roads
Although widely used to describe a "network of trade routes which connected the
East and West", the term is very inaccurate indeed; this is so because the silk trade in
itself was a minor part of the trade exchanged between 'East' and 'West'. The
historically correct and exact term is "Silk-, Spice-, and Perfume-Routes via Land,
Desert and Sea" or alternatively "Land-,Desert- and Sea-Routes of Silk-, Spice-, and
Perfume-Trade". Perfume stands for all types of incense. At this point, one has to
point out that the multivalent geographical terms 'East' and 'West' mean diverse
lands and localities to different audiences at all times.
The earliest form of the aforementioned network of trade routes consisted of two
commercial roads that linked 4th millennium BCE Mesopotamia, i.e. Sumer and
Elam, with Central Asia and the Indus Valley; in the second case, we also have
plenty of indications of sea trade. This means that we can already speak of land-,
desert- and sea-routes as early as the beginning of the Bronze Age. Findings at Tepe
Yahya, Iran fully document the Mesopotamian – Indian trade thatdates back in the
middle of the 4th millennium BCE. Similarly, impressive findings, such as Proto-
Elamite tablets, excavated at Tepe Sialk, Iran bear witness to the developed form of
trade that Mesopotamia had with Central Asia at the end of the 4th millennium BCE.
The same is also valid for Tureng Tepe, near Gorgan, and furtheron for Yarim Tepe,
near Gonbad-e Kavus, in NE Iran. This brings the kingdoms and the empires of
Mesopotamia in direct contact with Siberian cultures, such as Andronovo and
Karasuk, that ranged from the Caspian Sea to Aral to Yenissei and maintained
evident contacts with Dzungaria and China in the 2nd and the 1st half of the 1st
millennium BCE. Across these early trade roads, the movements of Scytho–Siberian
nations generated a turmoil that the Achaemenid shahs of Iran spent time to contain.
The real establishment of the network of trade routes that we now call 'silk road' is
entirely attributed to Achaemenid Iran. Having understood the enormous benefits
that would derive from the systematization of the earlier existed networks of trade
routes, the early Achaemenids dedicated a great effort to set up safe imperial roads
across their immense empire. The 'Royal Road' was the original part (Susa to Sardis;
2700 km), but soon after the entire empire was endowed with a great network of sea,
desert and land routes.
As a matter of fact, the establishment of the Silk Road was the mere consolidation,
improvement, interconnection and imperial administration of the earlier existed
trade routes. Egypt had established a maritime connection with Somalia and Eastern
Africa as early as the beginning of the 2nd millennium BCE or even earlier; with
Egypt as Achaemenid Iranian province,Iran benefitted enormously from this trade.
Furthermore, the circumnavigation of the Arabian Peninsula would permit the
imperial administration to bypass Babylonia, when ensuring transportation of
products, services and armies between mainland Iran and Egypt.
For this purpose, Darius I reopened the Old Suez Canal (from the area of today's
Zagazig and the Bubastite branch of the Delta to the Timsah Lake, which was
connected at the time with the Red Sea by means of a natural canal) that had fallen in
desuetude for centuries; this is solemnly stated in the Achaemenid Shah's
quadrilingual inscription (in Old Achaemenid, Babylonian,Elamite and Egyptian
Hietoglyphic), e.g. the so-called Shaluf stele.
It is on this background that silk products started moving across the aforementioned
network of trade routes and also across extra roads appended to this network; thanks
to the Pazyryk culture, silk was found as west as the kurgans of Ukraine or
Heuneburg and Rheingoenheim in Germany and as early as the middle of the 1st
millennium BCE. Exchanges, silk tributes and silk trade were only intensified after
the 3rd c. BCE, and more specifically after the Battle of Baideng (白登之戰), when
Gaozu of Han (漢高祖) was defeated and had to pay a heavy tribute to Motun (冒頓
單于), the founder of the Hun (Xiongnu) Empire.
The enormous trade development, which ensued, was certainly due to numerous
parameters other than the establishment of the Achaemenid trade network, the
construction of royal roads across Iran, and the annual tributes of the Han emperors
to the Xiongnu. The role of the Aramaeans, the Sogdians and the Khotanese in terms
of product diversification, road bifurcation, linguistic impact,spiritual influence, and
cultural exchange was outstanding; this shows that, despite the importance of states,
the catalytic activity of private entrepreneurs was unmatched. The states extracted
benefits and levied customs duties, but the pioneering practice and spirit were
private. This is how Buddhism, Manichaeism, and Nestorian Christianity made their
way to China.
II. China
The State of the Middle (中國/中国) was late to expandto the West, in Central Asia
and further on. Only at the times of Han dynasty (206 BCE – 220 CE), Zhang Qian
(張騫) was tasked (138 BCE) to effectuate a trip to establish contacts with the Yuezhi
and other Central Asiatic states; however, he and his guards had to spend ten years
in Xiongnu prisons, before returning (125 BCE) to Chang'an (Xi'an) and writing his
reports about countries he visited (Dayuan kingdom in Ferghana, Yuezhi kingdom in
Transoxiana, Tokharian kingdom of Daxia in Bactria, and Kangjiu kingdom in
Sogdiana) and he did not visit (Anxi kingdom of Arsacid Parthian Iran,Tiaozhi
kingdom of Seleucid Syria, Shendu kingdom of Indo-Scythians in Southern Pakistan,
and Wusun kingdom in the Tarim Basin).
It is only at the end of the 2nd c. BCE (104-102) that Li Guangli (李廣利) and Chinese
army undertook an expedition to Ferghana (Dayuan) and successfully besieged Osh
(in today's Kyrgyzstan). Finally, the Tarim Basin became Chinese imperial territory
(Protectorate of the Western Regions: 西域都護府) only during the 1st c. BCE.
However, the Hexi Corridor to Dunhuang and the Western Regions remained
unstable for many long centuries.
A Chinese embassy may have reached Rome at the times of Octavian, if we take into
account the text of Florus, an African Roman historiographer of the 1st – 2nd c. CE.
And around the end of the 1st c. CE, General Ban Chao (班超),the imperial
administrator of the 'Western Regions' (basically the Tarim Basin), advanced further
in the West up to an undefined location in Central Asia; several Western Orientalists
advanced the theory of Ban Chao reaching the eastern shores of the Caspian Sea,but
there is no certainty in this. On the contrary, what is sure is that Ban Chao's envoy,
Gan Ying (甘英) reached the 'Western Sea' (which can be variably identified with the
Persian Gulf, the Caspian Sea or the Mediterranean Sea); it is a matter of scholarly
interpretation of few excerpts in the Hou Hanshu Annals.
Last, in the middle of the 3rd c. CE, Yu Huan writes in his illustrious Weilüe (魏略)
about the Black River (Hei Shui: 黑水) that demarcates the Western territories of the
Roman Empire (: Atlantic Ocean), pretty much like his contemporary Roman
counterpart, the famous historian Ammianus Marcellinus, who wrote in the middle
of the 4th c. CE about the Eurasiatic landmass' easternmost confines only to use
almost similar terms:
Ultra haec utriusque Scythiae loca, contra orientalem plagam in orbis speciem consertae,
celsorum aggerum summitatesambiunt Seras, ubertate regionum et amplitudine
circumspectos, ab occidentali latere Scythis annexos, a septentrione et orientali nivosae
solitudini cohaerentes.
As a matter of fact, moving across the Land-, Desert- and Sea-Routes of Silk-, Spice-,
and Perfume-Trade, major religions, faiths and cults were diffused from
Mesopotamia, Iran and India to China:
A. Buddhism reached China at the times of Han dynasty (first mention: 65 CE at the
times of Emperor Ming, 明),
B. Manichaeism (明教: the bright religion, Míngjiào) appeared in China at the times
of Tang dynasty in a completely sinicized form as the Dunhuang manuscripts
sufficiently evidence, and
C. Nestorian Christianity was introduced in China also at the times of Tang dynasty
(618-690 and 705-907).The first mention is found in the bilingual (Syriac – Aramaic
and Chinese) Nestorian Stele (or Xi'an Stele), which dates in 781 and commemorates
the Persian monk Alopen's mission to China that occurred in 635 during the reign of
Emperor Taizong, 太宗).
III. Islam
Little time after the arrival of Manichaeism and Nestorian Christianity in China,
Islam reached the borders of Emperor Gaozong (高宗)'s state at the very middle of
the 7th c., thanks to the zeal of Sa`d ibn Abi Waqqas. As per various Hui Muslims'
legends, Gaozong (reign: 649-683) expressed certain sympathy for Islam, viewing in
it a form of Confucian Morality.
Moving across the Land-, Desert- and Sea-Routes of Silk-, Spice-, and Perfume-Trade,
early Muslim traders and navigators were present in China either in the Western
provinces (Tarim Basin) or in the Eastern coast, and more particularly in Canton
(Guangzhou), as early as the 7th and 8th centuries.
When it comes to religions diffused in China along the Silk Road, there is a
tremendous difference between Buddhism, Manichaeism, and Nestorian Christianity
from one side and Islam from the other side. The former three religions were never
state religions of a powerful empire, whereas Islam was already the state religion of
the Umayyad Caliphate,which – only 30 years after the death of Prophet
Muhammad – stretched from Libya to Central Asia to the Indus Valley. The early
Islamic expansion to the east (651) reached Rey, Nishapur and Khurasan in today's
NE Iran. The next stage of the expansion in Central Asia involved fierce clashes with
the Kingdom of Sogdia and the Buddhist Turkic states in Central Asia and Siberia
during the late 7th and the early 8th c. Following the Islamic conquest of Bukhara
and Samarqand (706-712), the Chinese emperors took the case more seriously.
Chinese armies fought to stop the Islamic advance in very bloody battles across the
famous Ferghana Valley in 715 only to be engaged in another battle two years later at
Aksu, further to the east, in the Tarim basin. This was an early Chinese victory. The
entire region between Kashgar and Samarqand became then a critical, frontal zone.
However, for some time, the gradual decadence of the Umayyaddynasty prevented
Muslim armies from further focusing on Central Asia. With the rise of the Abbasid
dynasty, one of the major historical battles took place in the Talas River Valley (751).
It was a major victory for the Abbasid forces and it marked the end of Chinese
presence in Central Asia. Prevalence in that region ensured enormous benefits for
Abbasid Baghdad.
However, the Abbasid – Chinese relationship took another course with the An
Lushan Rebellion (755-763; An–Shi Disturbances:安史之亂), when general An
Lushan challenged the imperial throne; to successfully squelch the event, the
embattled Emperor Suzong (肅宗) wrote a letter to the Abbasid Caliph Al Mansur,
asking his help. The Caliph dispatched a force of 4000 Muslim soldiers, who helped
reinstall the order in Chang'an. This event means thatat the time one could
encounter Abbasid soldiers in full control of territories that were located at a direct
distance of almost 9500 km from one another (from the Maghreb coast of
Northwestern Africa to Xi'an)!
The infamous rebellion ended after much time passed and much blood was shed
only to weaken the Tang monarchs.However, Tang dynasty marked an era of
religious tolerance, cultural exchanges, Eurasiatic cosmopolitanism and numerous
intermarriages. Sogdian merchants, Muslim soldiers and other foreigners
significantly contributed to the Chinese civilization and became dignitaries of the
imperial administration by learning Chinese, hiding their ethnic identity, and
changing their names. The vicinity of Turan (the term denotes Eastern Europe,
Central Asia, Siberia, Northern Asia, Mongolia and today's NW China) with the
world of Islam was the reason for a) the conversion of many Turanians to Islam, b)
the rise of many Turanian Muslim rulers in various lands of the Caliphate as far as
Africa, and c) the flourishing trade routes across Central and Northern Asia.
The formation and the magnificent expansion of the Turanian Islamic empires, which
are falsely called 'Mongol' (the term denotes a military rank, not a historical nation)
are not as spectacular and as fortuitous as depicted in the Western Orientalist
bibliography. The Great State (Ulug Ulus) or 'Golden Horde' (Altın Urda) that
controlled (1242–1502) all lands from Poland to the easternmost confines of Northern
Asia is not the side effect of the division of the Turanian (: 'Mongol') Empire. It is the
continuation of a millennium long Turanian prevalence across the said territories
and the successor to numerous earlier empires involving the Xianbei Empire (93-234
CE), the Rouran Khaganate (330-555 CE), the Hunnic Empire (370–469), the Göktürk
Khaganate (552-659 CE), the Eastern Turkic Khaganate (581-650 CE), the Western
Turkic Khaganate (581–657),the Second Turkic Khaganate (682–744), the Uyghur
Khaganate (744–840),the Yenisei Kyrgyz Khaganate (840-1207), the Liao Empire
(916–1125)and the Khamag Empire (10th c. – 1206). During those ages, 'silk road
trader', 'Turanian' and 'Muslim' became almost synonyms.
Muslims played a great role in China's History at the times of Song dynasty (960-
1279; 宋朝), whereas at the times of the Mongol dynasty (1271-1368; the Great Yuan -
大元), following extensive intermarriages, they became a very important component
of China's economic, social and intellectual life. As the fratricidal wars among
Turanian nations intensified, Muslims and Chinese fought against the Mongols and
some of China's most illustrious generals were Muslims indeed, like Lan Yu (藍玉).
When the Mongols were finally kicked out of China, Hongwu (洪武), the founding
emperor of the Ming dynasty (1368-1644; 大明), felt obliged to compose (1368) the
celebrated Hundred-word Eulogy (bǎizìzàn: 百字讃) and thus express his great
veneration of Prophet Muhammad, 'the most noble sage', as he described him.
Hongwu found it also important to send a letter to John V Palaiologos and keep him
informed about the rise of the Ming dynasty.
Quite contrarily, Chinese Muslims, as Ming loyalists, suffered enormous losses at the
times of Qing dynasty, which originated from the Manchu,a minority; this period
marks however the progressive decline of all major Asiatic empires: the Ottomans,
the Iranians, the Mughal Gorkanian (of India), and the Chinese.
IV. The decline of the Islamic Empiresand of China overthe
past four centuries
The advent of Qing dynasty (1636-1912) ushered China in a new era that proved to
be the worst page of China's 4000-year long History. Qing rulers' major counterparts
in Asia and Africa were found in the same situation either their dynasty's origins go
back to 1300 or their rule was established around 1500. Hong Taiji (皇太極),the
founding emperor (1636-1643), was contemporaneous with
- Shah-Jahan-i-Azam ( ‫شاہ‬‫جہان‬‫اعظم‬ : 1627-1658) of the Gurkanian Mongol ('Mughal')
dynasty (who had the famous Taj Mahal mausoleum built),
- Shah Safi ( ‫شاہ‬‫صف‬‫ی‬ : 1629-1642) of the Turkmen Safavid dynasty of Iran, and
- Sultan Murad IV ( ‫مراد‬‫رابع‬ : 1623-1640) of the Ottoman Empire.
A good indication of the minimal degree of threat discernment, friend-foe
identification system, universal perspective, diplomatic diligence, and imperial
preparation that characterized all four major Afro-Asiatic empires is the fact that
Hong Taiji's reign coincided with the end of the 16-year long Ottoman–Safavid War
(1623–1639) which dramatically weakened both empires. The Ottomans won and
prevailed in Mesopotamia, but short term gains proved to be useless, as they could
not ensure enduring strength.
Hong Taiji's reign was also marked by two major events in the North of Asia: the rise
of the Romanov dynasty under Michael I Romanov (Михаил Фёдорович Романов:
1613-1645)of Russia and the Russian expansion across Northern Siberia, afterthe
collapse of the Sibir Khanate in 1598. The Russians reached the Pacific Ocean in 1639,
decimating indigenous nations (Buryats; Yakuts; in the case of Chukchis, Koraks,
Itelmens and Yukagirs, we attested a planned genocide) and spreading diseases
(smallpox). Of course, the Kazakh Khanate was still strong under Salqam-Jangir
Khan (1629–1680),but again the incessant wars among the Central Asiatic khanates
(Bukhara, Tashkent,etc) created a worrisome situation not far from China's western
borders.
Another even graver problem for China and for the Central Asiatic khanates was the
rise of the Buddhist Dzungar Khanate (1634) and the dreams of their ruler Erdeni
Batur, who attempted to revive the gigantic state of Genghis Khan. The ceaseless
wars between the Kazakhs and Dzungaria (1643–1756), as well as between Qing
China and the Dzungars (1687–1757), ended with the Dzungar defeatand genocide
but paved the way for Russian predominance across Northern Asia. No Asiatic
empire benefited from these developments.
Similar situations were attested in Southern Asia whereby the three Muslim
emperors did not have the foresight to avoid divisions and fratricidal wars and to set
up a common front against the seafaring empires, namely the Portuguese, the Dutch,
the French and the English. It is true that the emergence of the Turkmen Safavids in
Iran (with Shah Ismail I in 1502), the advent of the Mongol Gurkanian (with Babur in
1526) and the Ottoman rise in the East and expansion in Africa (from Egypt to
Somalia to Algeria) under Yavuz Sultan Selim I (1512-1520) andhis successors
occurred only on an extremely divided and diversified, almost millennium-long,
background of Islamic faith and power.
Only in its very early period, the Islamic Caliphate proved to be a centripetal force.
However, when the Caliphs expanded beyond the borders of the Sassanid Empire
(224-651) under Khusraw II (590/591-628),centrifugal forces prevailed only to prove
that Central Asia and Carthage can never belong to the same empire - as already
Darius I, the Achaemenidian (522-486), dreamt of but failed to implement.
Furthermore, the prevalence of centrifugal forces within the immense Abbasid
Empire was only a normal, historical phenomenon, because Islam was diffused
among nations very far away from one another, with very different spiritual, cultural
and historical backgrounds with which the proponents of the new faith were forced
to interact in many dimensions. As early as the 10th century the contrast was
enormous among Muslims in Andalusia, Egypt, Somalia, Yemen, Iran, India and
Central Asia. To this testifies the enormous number of mystic brotherhoods, religious
tariqas, philosophical doctrines, academic – scientific schools, literary styles, artistic
and architectural rhythms, theological dogmas and systems of jurisprudence, which
grew like mushrooms from Andalusia to Yemen to Central Asia, during the first 300
years of Islamic rule. Consequently, further divisions were to ensue.
At the beginning of the 16th c., most of the Dravidian Deccan (Modern India's
southern part) was divided among the Golconda Sultanate (Qutb Shahi dynasty /
Shia), the Bijapur Sultanate (Adil Shahi dynasty / Shia), the Ahmednagar Sultanate
(Nizam Shahi dynasty / Shia) and the Brahmani Sultanate (Barid Shahi dynasty /
Sunni and Shia). This was not a particularity of the subcontinent only.
The same multidivisional structure of the Deccan was attested across the Ocean in
the Eastern African coast; the Sultanate of Ifat, the Adal Sultanate, the Warsangali
Sultanate, the Sultanate of Mogadishu, the formidable Ajuran Sultanate, the Geledi
Sultanate, the Kilwa Sultanate (whose seafarers were the first known to have reached
Australia long before the English) and other smaller Eastern African principalities
(Mombasa, Pemba, Zanzibar, Mafia, Comoro, Mozambique Island, etc.) existed and
prospered for centuries, having always fully recognized the Caliph's authority
without however becoming incorporated in the Caliphate stricto sensu. Some of the
Somali sultanates were strong enough to oppose the Portuguese, and the history of
Ajuran – Portuguese wars (16th – 17th c.) marks the first and perhaps the most epic
page of the illustrious African anti-colonial fights.
In many among the aforementioned cases, a Yemenite, an Iranian or a Turanian
arrived in either the Deccan or Eastern Africa and they were easily accepted as rulers
among the local Muslims. It was only after many decades and numerous wars that
the Mongol Gurkanian authority managed to incorporate the Deccan sultanates in
the Empire. And after Aurangzeb ( ‫اورنگ‬‫ز‬‫ی‬‫ب‬ : 1658-1707) the decline started.
Many consider the Iranian invasion of the Mongol South Asiatic Empire, which was
undertaken by the Turkmen Afshar Nader Shah ( ‫نادر‬‫شاہ‬‫افشار‬ : 1736-1747) in 1739, as
the main reason for the subsequent collapse of the vast state of the Gurkanian whose
formidable empire is fallaciously called 'Mughal India' by English Orientalists and
historical forgers. The Iranian invasion, as well as the sack and the plunder of the
Old Delhi, were a terrible hit, but they were not the main reason for the demise of the
Gurkanian.
As a matter of fact, the concessions made to the British East India Company and the
farman issued by Farrukhsiyar ( ‫فرخ‬‫س‬‫ی‬‫ر‬ : 1713-1719), who allowed to English colonials
the right to reside and trade in the Mughal Empire, were an inane and ominous
decision. It was that cruel and criminal company that prepared the final collapse of
the greatest South Asiatic Empire of all times and deposed Bahadur Shah II, the last
Mongol Emperor, in 1862, i.e. 145 years afterhis idiotic and pathetic predecessor
offered them the aforementioned privileges. As the Gurkanian Mongol power was
dissolved, it was easy for the criminal colonials of England to start the Opium Wars
(1839-1860) against China.
However, all major Afro-Asiatic empires, the Ottomans,the Safavids, the Gurkanian
and the Qing failed to assess – already in the 17th c. as they should have had – the
real nature, the scope, the targets, the profits and the consequences of the
phenomenal company, which was incorporated in 1602 and started being active from
India to Japan as early as 1608-1609: the Dutch East India Company. Seeking
concessions and imperial protection, safe passages, and legal presence, the Dutch
generated enormous profits, which if known and analyzed would surely be
perceived as a threat for the Mughal durbar.
The Dutch were present in Gujarat (Suratte,1616), Malabar (1661), Coromandel
(1608), Bengal (1627) and also in Sri Lanka (1640), but their enormous benefits and
the ensued antagonism with other powers (Denmark, France and England) were not
perceived as real threats by the Mongol Gurkanian. Quite contrarily, they willingly
entered into compromises with the company, only because they were not strong on
the sea. Even worse, they failed to monitor, examine and assess the groundbreaking
company's potentialities, the real intentions behind it, the wealth accumulated due to
multiple factors (the spice trade monopoly being only one), and the deriving threats
for the Mughal Empire. Each and every time, the Mughal palatial administration
dealt with the symptoms and not with the root causes, which they had not even
imagined, let alone identified. The same attitude characterized the Qing, the Safavids
and the Ottomans in their relations with either this company or other Western
European corporations and schemes.
As a matter of fact, the Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie (VOC) consisted in a
hitherto unknown form of expansion in which individual zeal, personal risk, human
fascination with extraordinary material wealth,private entrepreneurship,and
corporate systematization preceded all forms of military aggression and state
conflict; this concept spearheaded a new type of expansionism that had cataclysmic
impact and deteriorated all aspects of military conflict and cruelty. In fact, it was a
state within a state or, if you want, a CorporNation. Even worse, it weaponized
knowledge, thus totally altering and distorting the foundations of scholarly research,
academic study, and human exploration that were historically accepted by all
cultures and civilizations worldwide until that time. Quite unfortunately, this was
not noticed by any Afro-Asiatic imperial establishment – even at a moment they
were still omnipotent.
The Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb (1658–1707) is an excellent example in this regard;
he was contemporaneous with
- the Ottoman sultans and Caliphs Mehmed IV (1648-1687),Suleyman II (1687-1691),
Ahmed II (1691-1695), Mustafa II (1695-1703), and Ahmed III (1703-1730),
- the Safavid shahs of Iran Abbas II (1642-1666), Suleyman I (1666-1694), and the last
Safavid, Sultan Husayn (1694-1722),and
- the Qing Emperors Shunzhi (1644-1661) and Kangxi (1662-1722).
None of these imperial establishments, which were still quite powerful, was able to
either be informed about the publication in Holland of the monumental series of
volumes of Hortus Malabaricus (1678–1693) or grasp its real meaning and grave
consequences. Never before had specialized knowledge acquired such pre-eminence
among a state's priorities in view of future profit. Detailed and exact science was not
anymore a scholarly endeavor but a corporate, entrepreneurial task. And who was
the author of the grand opus? None other than Hendrik van Rheede (1636–1691), the
Governor of Dutch Malabar atthe time!
I can understand that the Ottomans, the Safavids and the Qing were not directly
involved; but the highly educated Aurangzeb whose name means "the Ornamentof
the Throne" and whose royal title was Alamgir ("Conqueror of the World" in Farsi)
should have got due information about this great work and should have assessed it
as a real weapon against his own throne. Hortus Malabaricus is an enormous treatise
about the flora of Malabar, a territory that corresponds to present day India's Kerala
and Karnataka. With this treatise, an average Dutch in Amsterdam would know the
flora of Kerala better than the emperor in whose state Kerala belonged. Thus, Natural
Sciences became a tool for further corporate profit.
Weaponized knowledge and far-fetched explorations, pioneering fieldwork,
archaeological excavations, antiques collections, a great number of monument
purchasing diplomats, and entire armies of 'arrogant connoisseurs' would soon be
unleashed against the four Afro-Asiatic empires. A real scramble for manuscripts,
inscriptions, bas-reliefs, coins and bronzes would then take place. This would bring
forth a hitherto unseen form of conquest and occupation.
That's why modern historians, who focus on 18th c. and 19th c. Ottoman –Iranian
wars (1730-1736 between the Ottomans Ahmed III and Mahmud I and the last
Safavid shah Tahmasp II, Abbas III, and Nader Shah of Iran; 1743-1746 between
Mahmud I and Nader Shah; 1775-1776 between Abdulhamid I and Karim Khan
Zend; 1821-1823 between Mahmud II and Fath Ali Shah of the Turkmen Qajar
dynasty) to find the reasons of the Western European powers' meteoric rise at the
world stage during the 19th and the 20th centuries, really miss the point.
As a matter of fact, the real battles were engaged not in the war fronts but in caves,
archaeological sites, libraries, museums, European universities' Oriental
departments, and the personal cabinets of professors and decipherers who decoded
ancient signs that were tragically meaningless and disastrously useless to the
Sultans, the Shahs, the Gurkanian and the Qing. The deciphermentof ancient scripts
was completed with the formulation of a fallacious World History, which was
meticulously preconceived as per the arrogant connoisseurs' interests, worldview
and discriminatory attitude toward the rest. Then,colonial diplomats, military
regiments, various agents, indigenous traitors, corrupt businessmen, and local
puppets undertook the enduring work of imposing this fallacious World History on
local populations by means of Education, Culture, Publications, and Mass Media.
Indiscriminately, from Morocco to China, all alternatives were used to alter natives.
(to be continued)

More Related Content

What's hot

Chapter 10 Breakdowns
Chapter 10 BreakdownsChapter 10 Breakdowns
Chapter 10 Breakdowns
Cameron Benton
 
Trade routes in ancient india
Trade routes in ancient indiaTrade routes in ancient india
Trade routes in ancient india
Prachya Adhyayan
 
Lecture vii ancient civilization
Lecture vii ancient civilizationLecture vii ancient civilization
Lecture vii ancient civilization
Hena Dutt
 
Greek Bronze Age
Greek Bronze AgeGreek Bronze Age
Greek Bronze Age
ssclasstorremar
 
Five Hearths of Urbanization - Mesopotamia
Five Hearths of Urbanization - MesopotamiaFive Hearths of Urbanization - Mesopotamia
Five Hearths of Urbanization - Mesopotamia
Mimi Alguidano
 
The Kingdom of Carthage
The Kingdom of CarthageThe Kingdom of Carthage
The Kingdom of Carthage
Boutkhil Guemide
 
Shang Dynasty
Shang DynastyShang Dynasty
Shang Dynasty
freealan
 
Axum
AxumAxum
Axum
boba tour
 
Ancient greece
Ancient greeceAncient greece
Ancient greece
Boutkhil Guemide
 
Feudal japan
Feudal japanFeudal japan
Feudal japan
Dave Phillips
 
Ras ben comebussus1
Ras ben comebussus1Ras ben comebussus1
Ras ben comebussus1
Rasta101
 
Ras ben comebussus1
Ras ben comebussus1Ras ben comebussus1
Ras ben comebussus1
Rasta101
 
Ancient civilisations
Ancient civilisationsAncient civilisations
Ancient civilisations
ZespolSzkolZawiercie
 
Comparingempiresfinalpdf (1)
Comparingempiresfinalpdf (1)Comparingempiresfinalpdf (1)
Comparingempiresfinalpdf (1)
ValPatton
 
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500 v2.0
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500 v2.0Asian Maritime Trade before 1500 v2.0
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500 v2.0
Jerry Daperro
 
Mesopotamia :The First Civilization
Mesopotamia :The First CivilizationMesopotamia :The First Civilization
Mesopotamia :The First Civilization
Nikki Shree
 
2.3 & 2.4 indus valley and early china
2.3 & 2.4   indus valley and early china2.3 & 2.4   indus valley and early china
2.3 & 2.4 indus valley and early china
Ashley Birmingham
 
LU 3 Ancient Near East
LU 3 Ancient Near EastLU 3 Ancient Near East
LU 3 Ancient Near East
Nahareen Rahim
 
Fertile crescent part 1 power point
Fertile crescent part 1 power pointFertile crescent part 1 power point
Fertile crescent part 1 power point
bmorin54
 
Mesopotamia
MesopotamiaMesopotamia
Mesopotamia
Rocío Bautista
 

What's hot (20)

Chapter 10 Breakdowns
Chapter 10 BreakdownsChapter 10 Breakdowns
Chapter 10 Breakdowns
 
Trade routes in ancient india
Trade routes in ancient indiaTrade routes in ancient india
Trade routes in ancient india
 
Lecture vii ancient civilization
Lecture vii ancient civilizationLecture vii ancient civilization
Lecture vii ancient civilization
 
Greek Bronze Age
Greek Bronze AgeGreek Bronze Age
Greek Bronze Age
 
Five Hearths of Urbanization - Mesopotamia
Five Hearths of Urbanization - MesopotamiaFive Hearths of Urbanization - Mesopotamia
Five Hearths of Urbanization - Mesopotamia
 
The Kingdom of Carthage
The Kingdom of CarthageThe Kingdom of Carthage
The Kingdom of Carthage
 
Shang Dynasty
Shang DynastyShang Dynasty
Shang Dynasty
 
Axum
AxumAxum
Axum
 
Ancient greece
Ancient greeceAncient greece
Ancient greece
 
Feudal japan
Feudal japanFeudal japan
Feudal japan
 
Ras ben comebussus1
Ras ben comebussus1Ras ben comebussus1
Ras ben comebussus1
 
Ras ben comebussus1
Ras ben comebussus1Ras ben comebussus1
Ras ben comebussus1
 
Ancient civilisations
Ancient civilisationsAncient civilisations
Ancient civilisations
 
Comparingempiresfinalpdf (1)
Comparingempiresfinalpdf (1)Comparingempiresfinalpdf (1)
Comparingempiresfinalpdf (1)
 
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500 v2.0
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500 v2.0Asian Maritime Trade before 1500 v2.0
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500 v2.0
 
Mesopotamia :The First Civilization
Mesopotamia :The First CivilizationMesopotamia :The First Civilization
Mesopotamia :The First Civilization
 
2.3 & 2.4 indus valley and early china
2.3 & 2.4   indus valley and early china2.3 & 2.4   indus valley and early china
2.3 & 2.4 indus valley and early china
 
LU 3 Ancient Near East
LU 3 Ancient Near EastLU 3 Ancient Near East
LU 3 Ancient Near East
 
Fertile crescent part 1 power point
Fertile crescent part 1 power pointFertile crescent part 1 power point
Fertile crescent part 1 power point
 
Mesopotamia
MesopotamiaMesopotamia
Mesopotamia
 

Similar to The Historical Silk Roads, China and Islam - Part I

Waugh
WaughWaugh
Waugh
mehdi miri
 
Great Routs of Civilizations, Calendar 2016
Great Routs of Civilizations, Calendar 2016Great Routs of Civilizations, Calendar 2016
Great Routs of Civilizations, Calendar 2016
World Public Forum
 
600 -1450 powerpoint
600 -1450 powerpoint 600 -1450 powerpoint
600 -1450 powerpoint
LawK
 
Chapter 7 Breakdowns
Chapter 7 BreakdownsChapter 7 Breakdowns
Chapter 7 Breakdowns
Cameron Benton
 
Ancient yuezhi gurjar states
Ancient yuezhi gurjar statesAncient yuezhi gurjar states
Ancient yuezhi gurjar states
Adesh Katariya
 
Bronze age history of world
Bronze age history of worldBronze age history of world
Bronze age history of world
Adesh Katariya
 
Unitii
UnitiiUnitii
Unitii
Greg Sill
 
Chapter 07 ppt
Chapter 07 pptChapter 07 ppt
Chapter 07 ppt
APWorldHistory
 
Along the silk
Along the silkAlong the silk
Along the silk
anhit
 
9th Century Asian Voyage
9th Century Asian Voyage9th Century Asian Voyage
9th Century Asian Voyage
Jerry Daperro
 
Ch2 Explorations of Asia
Ch2 Explorations of AsiaCh2 Explorations of Asia
Ch2 Explorations of Asia
grieffel
 
Voyages and its implications
Voyages and its implicationsVoyages and its implications
Voyages and its implications
SayantanSamui
 
Early civilizations
Early civilizationsEarly civilizations
Early civilizations
Xiao Yun
 
Fertile Crescent
Fertile CrescentFertile Crescent
Fertile Crescent
Michelle Eckstein
 
EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA.
EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA.EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA.
EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA.
Mónica Herrera
 
Migrations In The Mediterranean
Migrations In The MediterraneanMigrations In The Mediterranean
Migrations In The Mediterranean
guest2f9029
 
Khazanah daripada Coretan Tome Pires
Khazanah daripada Coretan Tome PiresKhazanah daripada Coretan Tome Pires
Khazanah daripada Coretan Tome Pires
KOSPATI UKM
 
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500Asian Maritime Trade before 1500
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500
Jerry Daperro
 
Chapter 8
Chapter 8Chapter 8
Chapter 8
nking74
 
ISLAM.pdf
ISLAM.pdfISLAM.pdf
ISLAM.pdf
ccccccccdddddd
 

Similar to The Historical Silk Roads, China and Islam - Part I (20)

Waugh
WaughWaugh
Waugh
 
Great Routs of Civilizations, Calendar 2016
Great Routs of Civilizations, Calendar 2016Great Routs of Civilizations, Calendar 2016
Great Routs of Civilizations, Calendar 2016
 
600 -1450 powerpoint
600 -1450 powerpoint 600 -1450 powerpoint
600 -1450 powerpoint
 
Chapter 7 Breakdowns
Chapter 7 BreakdownsChapter 7 Breakdowns
Chapter 7 Breakdowns
 
Ancient yuezhi gurjar states
Ancient yuezhi gurjar statesAncient yuezhi gurjar states
Ancient yuezhi gurjar states
 
Bronze age history of world
Bronze age history of worldBronze age history of world
Bronze age history of world
 
Unitii
UnitiiUnitii
Unitii
 
Chapter 07 ppt
Chapter 07 pptChapter 07 ppt
Chapter 07 ppt
 
Along the silk
Along the silkAlong the silk
Along the silk
 
9th Century Asian Voyage
9th Century Asian Voyage9th Century Asian Voyage
9th Century Asian Voyage
 
Ch2 Explorations of Asia
Ch2 Explorations of AsiaCh2 Explorations of Asia
Ch2 Explorations of Asia
 
Voyages and its implications
Voyages and its implicationsVoyages and its implications
Voyages and its implications
 
Early civilizations
Early civilizationsEarly civilizations
Early civilizations
 
Fertile Crescent
Fertile CrescentFertile Crescent
Fertile Crescent
 
EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA.
EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA.EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA.
EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA.
 
Migrations In The Mediterranean
Migrations In The MediterraneanMigrations In The Mediterranean
Migrations In The Mediterranean
 
Khazanah daripada Coretan Tome Pires
Khazanah daripada Coretan Tome PiresKhazanah daripada Coretan Tome Pires
Khazanah daripada Coretan Tome Pires
 
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500Asian Maritime Trade before 1500
Asian Maritime Trade before 1500
 
Chapter 8
Chapter 8Chapter 8
Chapter 8
 
ISLAM.pdf
ISLAM.pdfISLAM.pdf
ISLAM.pdf
 

More from Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

World Politics as Black & White Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of...
World Politics as Black & White Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of...World Politics as Black & White Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of...
World Politics as Black & White Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of...
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Beyond Afrocentrism: Prerequisites for Somalia to lead African de-colonizatio...
Beyond Afrocentrism: Prerequisites for Somalia to lead African de-colonizatio...Beyond Afrocentrism: Prerequisites for Somalia to lead African de-colonizatio...
Beyond Afrocentrism: Prerequisites for Somalia to lead African de-colonizatio...
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Bulgarians Mentioned in Egyptian Papyri from Fayoum
Bulgarians Mentioned in Egyptian Papyri from FayoumBulgarians Mentioned in Egyptian Papyri from Fayoum
Bulgarians Mentioned in Egyptian Papyri from Fayoum
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesi...
The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesi...The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesi...
The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesi...
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Fo...
Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Fo...Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Fo...
Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Fo...
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – V
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – VA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – V
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – V
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IV
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IVA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IV
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IV
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – III
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IIIA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – III
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – III
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt's Only Chance for Survival – II
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt's Only Chance for Survival – IIA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt's Only Chance for Survival – II
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt's Only Chance for Survival – II
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – I
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – I
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – I
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Περί Κοπτολογίας, Καβάφη και Ιουλιανού του Παραβάτη
Περί Κοπτολογίας, Καβάφη και Ιουλιανού του ΠαραβάτηΠερί Κοπτολογίας, Καβάφη και Ιουλιανού του Παραβάτη
Περί Κοπτολογίας, Καβάφη και Ιουλιανού του Παραβάτη
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Νταβίντ Κελντάνι: Αραμαίος Νεστοριανός του ΒΔ Ιράν που προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ σ...
Νταβίντ Κελντάνι: Αραμαίος Νεστοριανός του ΒΔ Ιράν που προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ σ...Νταβίντ Κελντάνι: Αραμαίος Νεστοριανός του ΒΔ Ιράν που προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ σ...
Νταβίντ Κελντάνι: Αραμαίος Νεστοριανός του ΒΔ Ιράν που προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ σ...
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες, Ιδεολογίες, Αποδοχή μιας άλλης Θρησκεία...
Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες, Ιδεολογίες, Αποδοχή μιας άλλης Θρησκεία...Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες, Ιδεολογίες, Αποδοχή μιας άλλης Θρησκεία...
Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες, Ιδεολογίες, Αποδοχή μιας άλλης Θρησκεία...
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – 1990
Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – 1990Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – 1990
Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – 1990
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Σουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς (1987) & σημερινό σχόλιο
Σουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς (1987) & σημερινό σχόλιοΣουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς (1987) & σημερινό σχόλιο
Σουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς (1987) & σημερινό σχόλιο
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Η διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη
Η διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά ΜεγαλομμάτηΗ διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη
Η διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη - Εποπτεία,1987
Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη - Εποπτεία,1987Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη - Εποπτεία,1987
Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη - Εποπτεία,1987
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Αταργάτη: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Αταργάτη: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Αταργάτη: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Αταργάτη: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
 

More from Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis (20)

World Politics as Black & White Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of...
World Politics as Black & White Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of...World Politics as Black & White Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of...
World Politics as Black & White Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of...
 
Beyond Afrocentrism: Prerequisites for Somalia to lead African de-colonizatio...
Beyond Afrocentrism: Prerequisites for Somalia to lead African de-colonizatio...Beyond Afrocentrism: Prerequisites for Somalia to lead African de-colonizatio...
Beyond Afrocentrism: Prerequisites for Somalia to lead African de-colonizatio...
 
Bulgarians Mentioned in Egyptian Papyri from Fayoum
Bulgarians Mentioned in Egyptian Papyri from FayoumBulgarians Mentioned in Egyptian Papyri from Fayoum
Bulgarians Mentioned in Egyptian Papyri from Fayoum
 
The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesi...
The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesi...The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesi...
The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesi...
 
Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Fo...
Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Fo...Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Fo...
Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Fo...
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – V
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – VA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – V
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – V
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IV
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IVA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IV
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IV
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – III
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IIIA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – III
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – III
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt's Only Chance for Survival – II
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt's Only Chance for Survival – IIA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt's Only Chance for Survival – II
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt's Only Chance for Survival – II
 
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – I
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – IA Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – I
A Special Military Alliance with China is Egypt’s Only Chance for Survival – I
 
Περί Κοπτολογίας, Καβάφη και Ιουλιανού του Παραβάτη
Περί Κοπτολογίας, Καβάφη και Ιουλιανού του ΠαραβάτηΠερί Κοπτολογίας, Καβάφη και Ιουλιανού του Παραβάτη
Περί Κοπτολογίας, Καβάφη και Ιουλιανού του Παραβάτη
 
Νταβίντ Κελντάνι: Αραμαίος Νεστοριανός του ΒΔ Ιράν που προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ σ...
Νταβίντ Κελντάνι: Αραμαίος Νεστοριανός του ΒΔ Ιράν που προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ σ...Νταβίντ Κελντάνι: Αραμαίος Νεστοριανός του ΒΔ Ιράν που προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ σ...
Νταβίντ Κελντάνι: Αραμαίος Νεστοριανός του ΒΔ Ιράν που προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ σ...
 
Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες, Ιδεολογίες, Αποδοχή μιας άλλης Θρησκεία...
Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες, Ιδεολογίες, Αποδοχή μιας άλλης Θρησκεία...Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες, Ιδεολογίες, Αποδοχή μιας άλλης Θρησκεία...
Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες, Ιδεολογίες, Αποδοχή μιας άλλης Θρησκεία...
 
Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – 1990
Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – 1990Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – 1990
Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – 1990
 
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
 
Σουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς (1987) & σημερινό σχόλιο
Σουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς (1987) & σημερινό σχόλιοΣουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς (1987) & σημερινό σχόλιο
Σουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς (1987) & σημερινό σχόλιο
 
Η διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη
Η διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά ΜεγαλομμάτηΗ διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη
Η διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη
 
Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη - Εποπτεία,1987
Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη - Εποπτεία,1987Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη - Εποπτεία,1987
Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη - Εποπτεία,1987
 
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
 
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Αταργάτη: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Αταργάτη: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Αταργάτη: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Αταργάτη: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989
 

Recently uploaded

13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
FIRST INDIA
 
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries (1).pdf
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries (1).pdfThe Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries (1).pdf
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries (1).pdf
ECSPE - Saving the Persecuted and Enslaved
 
Organisations.pdf k[poikdip-jhhohuhejhnjhn
Organisations.pdf k[poikdip-jhhohuhejhnjhnOrganisations.pdf k[poikdip-jhhohuhejhnjhn
Organisations.pdf k[poikdip-jhhohuhejhnjhn
bhavenpr
 
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
bhavenpr
 
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
The Lifesciences Magazine
 
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
FIRST INDIA
 
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Oxford University
 
Saraikistan; unveiling the demand for a seperate province._20240522_011317_00...
Saraikistan; unveiling the demand for a seperate province._20240522_011317_00...Saraikistan; unveiling the demand for a seperate province._20240522_011317_00...
Saraikistan; unveiling the demand for a seperate province._20240522_011317_00...
MadholalHussain
 
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm  Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm  Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
rittaajmal71
 
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
FIRST INDIA
 
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
dynamo777
 
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
SABC News
 
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
FIRST INDIA
 
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
ckn2izdm
 
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyYoungest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
VoterMood
 
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
 
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
Filippo64
 
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHY
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHYलालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHY
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHY
VoterMood
 
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdf
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdfprojet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdf
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdf
EdouardHusson
 

Recently uploaded (19)

13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries (1).pdf
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries (1).pdfThe Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries (1).pdf
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries (1).pdf
 
Organisations.pdf k[poikdip-jhhohuhejhnjhn
Organisations.pdf k[poikdip-jhhohuhejhnjhnOrganisations.pdf k[poikdip-jhhohuhejhnjhn
Organisations.pdf k[poikdip-jhhohuhejhnjhn
 
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
 
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
 
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024
 
Saraikistan; unveiling the demand for a seperate province._20240522_011317_00...
Saraikistan; unveiling the demand for a seperate province._20240522_011317_00...Saraikistan; unveiling the demand for a seperate province._20240522_011317_00...
Saraikistan; unveiling the demand for a seperate province._20240522_011317_00...
 
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm  Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm  Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
 
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
 
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
 
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
 
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyYoungest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
 
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
 
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
 
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHY
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHYलालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHY
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHY
 
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdf
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdfprojet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdf
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdf
 

The Historical Silk Roads, China and Islam - Part I

  • 1. The Historical Silk Roads, China and Islam By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis The historical silk roads did not start with the beginning of History. However, when we refer to the very existence of the silk roads and to the developments that were unfolded because of them, we often forget that this remarkable affair that shaped the World History is merely a continuation and a prolongation of the earlier existed commercial roads that linked Central Asia, Siberia and India to Mesopotamia. On the other hand, due to other early commercial roads, Mesopotamia was also connected with the Caucasus region, Anatolia and the Balkans, and the Horn of Africa. Last, since the Dawn of the Civilization, the Valley of the Twin Rivers was densely linked with the Valley of the Nile, via the Syro-Phoenician – Palestinian corridor. I. The Historical Silk Roads Although widely used to describe a "network of trade routes which connected the East and West", the term is very inaccurate indeed; this is so because the silk trade in itself was a minor part of the trade exchanged between 'East' and 'West'. The historically correct and exact term is "Silk-, Spice-, and Perfume-Routes via Land, Desert and Sea" or alternatively "Land-,Desert- and Sea-Routes of Silk-, Spice-, and Perfume-Trade". Perfume stands for all types of incense. At this point, one has to point out that the multivalent geographical terms 'East' and 'West' mean diverse lands and localities to different audiences at all times. The earliest form of the aforementioned network of trade routes consisted of two commercial roads that linked 4th millennium BCE Mesopotamia, i.e. Sumer and Elam, with Central Asia and the Indus Valley; in the second case, we also have plenty of indications of sea trade. This means that we can already speak of land-, desert- and sea-routes as early as the beginning of the Bronze Age. Findings at Tepe Yahya, Iran fully document the Mesopotamian – Indian trade thatdates back in the middle of the 4th millennium BCE. Similarly, impressive findings, such as Proto- Elamite tablets, excavated at Tepe Sialk, Iran bear witness to the developed form of trade that Mesopotamia had with Central Asia at the end of the 4th millennium BCE. The same is also valid for Tureng Tepe, near Gorgan, and furtheron for Yarim Tepe, near Gonbad-e Kavus, in NE Iran. This brings the kingdoms and the empires of Mesopotamia in direct contact with Siberian cultures, such as Andronovo and Karasuk, that ranged from the Caspian Sea to Aral to Yenissei and maintained evident contacts with Dzungaria and China in the 2nd and the 1st half of the 1st millennium BCE. Across these early trade roads, the movements of Scytho–Siberian nations generated a turmoil that the Achaemenid shahs of Iran spent time to contain. The real establishment of the network of trade routes that we now call 'silk road' is entirely attributed to Achaemenid Iran. Having understood the enormous benefits that would derive from the systematization of the earlier existed networks of trade routes, the early Achaemenids dedicated a great effort to set up safe imperial roads across their immense empire. The 'Royal Road' was the original part (Susa to Sardis;
  • 2. 2700 km), but soon after the entire empire was endowed with a great network of sea, desert and land routes. As a matter of fact, the establishment of the Silk Road was the mere consolidation, improvement, interconnection and imperial administration of the earlier existed trade routes. Egypt had established a maritime connection with Somalia and Eastern Africa as early as the beginning of the 2nd millennium BCE or even earlier; with Egypt as Achaemenid Iranian province,Iran benefitted enormously from this trade. Furthermore, the circumnavigation of the Arabian Peninsula would permit the imperial administration to bypass Babylonia, when ensuring transportation of products, services and armies between mainland Iran and Egypt. For this purpose, Darius I reopened the Old Suez Canal (from the area of today's Zagazig and the Bubastite branch of the Delta to the Timsah Lake, which was connected at the time with the Red Sea by means of a natural canal) that had fallen in desuetude for centuries; this is solemnly stated in the Achaemenid Shah's quadrilingual inscription (in Old Achaemenid, Babylonian,Elamite and Egyptian Hietoglyphic), e.g. the so-called Shaluf stele. It is on this background that silk products started moving across the aforementioned network of trade routes and also across extra roads appended to this network; thanks to the Pazyryk culture, silk was found as west as the kurgans of Ukraine or Heuneburg and Rheingoenheim in Germany and as early as the middle of the 1st millennium BCE. Exchanges, silk tributes and silk trade were only intensified after the 3rd c. BCE, and more specifically after the Battle of Baideng (白登之戰), when Gaozu of Han (漢高祖) was defeated and had to pay a heavy tribute to Motun (冒頓 單于), the founder of the Hun (Xiongnu) Empire. The enormous trade development, which ensued, was certainly due to numerous parameters other than the establishment of the Achaemenid trade network, the construction of royal roads across Iran, and the annual tributes of the Han emperors to the Xiongnu. The role of the Aramaeans, the Sogdians and the Khotanese in terms of product diversification, road bifurcation, linguistic impact,spiritual influence, and cultural exchange was outstanding; this shows that, despite the importance of states, the catalytic activity of private entrepreneurs was unmatched. The states extracted benefits and levied customs duties, but the pioneering practice and spirit were private. This is how Buddhism, Manichaeism, and Nestorian Christianity made their way to China. II. China The State of the Middle (中國/中国) was late to expandto the West, in Central Asia and further on. Only at the times of Han dynasty (206 BCE – 220 CE), Zhang Qian (張騫) was tasked (138 BCE) to effectuate a trip to establish contacts with the Yuezhi and other Central Asiatic states; however, he and his guards had to spend ten years in Xiongnu prisons, before returning (125 BCE) to Chang'an (Xi'an) and writing his reports about countries he visited (Dayuan kingdom in Ferghana, Yuezhi kingdom in Transoxiana, Tokharian kingdom of Daxia in Bactria, and Kangjiu kingdom in Sogdiana) and he did not visit (Anxi kingdom of Arsacid Parthian Iran,Tiaozhi kingdom of Seleucid Syria, Shendu kingdom of Indo-Scythians in Southern Pakistan, and Wusun kingdom in the Tarim Basin).
  • 3. It is only at the end of the 2nd c. BCE (104-102) that Li Guangli (李廣利) and Chinese army undertook an expedition to Ferghana (Dayuan) and successfully besieged Osh (in today's Kyrgyzstan). Finally, the Tarim Basin became Chinese imperial territory (Protectorate of the Western Regions: 西域都護府) only during the 1st c. BCE. However, the Hexi Corridor to Dunhuang and the Western Regions remained unstable for many long centuries. A Chinese embassy may have reached Rome at the times of Octavian, if we take into account the text of Florus, an African Roman historiographer of the 1st – 2nd c. CE. And around the end of the 1st c. CE, General Ban Chao (班超),the imperial administrator of the 'Western Regions' (basically the Tarim Basin), advanced further in the West up to an undefined location in Central Asia; several Western Orientalists advanced the theory of Ban Chao reaching the eastern shores of the Caspian Sea,but there is no certainty in this. On the contrary, what is sure is that Ban Chao's envoy, Gan Ying (甘英) reached the 'Western Sea' (which can be variably identified with the Persian Gulf, the Caspian Sea or the Mediterranean Sea); it is a matter of scholarly interpretation of few excerpts in the Hou Hanshu Annals. Last, in the middle of the 3rd c. CE, Yu Huan writes in his illustrious Weilüe (魏略) about the Black River (Hei Shui: 黑水) that demarcates the Western territories of the Roman Empire (: Atlantic Ocean), pretty much like his contemporary Roman counterpart, the famous historian Ammianus Marcellinus, who wrote in the middle of the 4th c. CE about the Eurasiatic landmass' easternmost confines only to use almost similar terms: Ultra haec utriusque Scythiae loca, contra orientalem plagam in orbis speciem consertae, celsorum aggerum summitatesambiunt Seras, ubertate regionum et amplitudine circumspectos, ab occidentali latere Scythis annexos, a septentrione et orientali nivosae solitudini cohaerentes. As a matter of fact, moving across the Land-, Desert- and Sea-Routes of Silk-, Spice-, and Perfume-Trade, major religions, faiths and cults were diffused from Mesopotamia, Iran and India to China: A. Buddhism reached China at the times of Han dynasty (first mention: 65 CE at the times of Emperor Ming, 明), B. Manichaeism (明教: the bright religion, Míngjiào) appeared in China at the times of Tang dynasty in a completely sinicized form as the Dunhuang manuscripts sufficiently evidence, and C. Nestorian Christianity was introduced in China also at the times of Tang dynasty (618-690 and 705-907).The first mention is found in the bilingual (Syriac – Aramaic and Chinese) Nestorian Stele (or Xi'an Stele), which dates in 781 and commemorates the Persian monk Alopen's mission to China that occurred in 635 during the reign of Emperor Taizong, 太宗). III. Islam
  • 4. Little time after the arrival of Manichaeism and Nestorian Christianity in China, Islam reached the borders of Emperor Gaozong (高宗)'s state at the very middle of the 7th c., thanks to the zeal of Sa`d ibn Abi Waqqas. As per various Hui Muslims' legends, Gaozong (reign: 649-683) expressed certain sympathy for Islam, viewing in it a form of Confucian Morality. Moving across the Land-, Desert- and Sea-Routes of Silk-, Spice-, and Perfume-Trade, early Muslim traders and navigators were present in China either in the Western provinces (Tarim Basin) or in the Eastern coast, and more particularly in Canton (Guangzhou), as early as the 7th and 8th centuries. When it comes to religions diffused in China along the Silk Road, there is a tremendous difference between Buddhism, Manichaeism, and Nestorian Christianity from one side and Islam from the other side. The former three religions were never state religions of a powerful empire, whereas Islam was already the state religion of the Umayyad Caliphate,which – only 30 years after the death of Prophet Muhammad – stretched from Libya to Central Asia to the Indus Valley. The early Islamic expansion to the east (651) reached Rey, Nishapur and Khurasan in today's NE Iran. The next stage of the expansion in Central Asia involved fierce clashes with the Kingdom of Sogdia and the Buddhist Turkic states in Central Asia and Siberia during the late 7th and the early 8th c. Following the Islamic conquest of Bukhara and Samarqand (706-712), the Chinese emperors took the case more seriously. Chinese armies fought to stop the Islamic advance in very bloody battles across the famous Ferghana Valley in 715 only to be engaged in another battle two years later at Aksu, further to the east, in the Tarim basin. This was an early Chinese victory. The entire region between Kashgar and Samarqand became then a critical, frontal zone. However, for some time, the gradual decadence of the Umayyaddynasty prevented Muslim armies from further focusing on Central Asia. With the rise of the Abbasid dynasty, one of the major historical battles took place in the Talas River Valley (751). It was a major victory for the Abbasid forces and it marked the end of Chinese presence in Central Asia. Prevalence in that region ensured enormous benefits for Abbasid Baghdad. However, the Abbasid – Chinese relationship took another course with the An Lushan Rebellion (755-763; An–Shi Disturbances:安史之亂), when general An Lushan challenged the imperial throne; to successfully squelch the event, the embattled Emperor Suzong (肅宗) wrote a letter to the Abbasid Caliph Al Mansur, asking his help. The Caliph dispatched a force of 4000 Muslim soldiers, who helped reinstall the order in Chang'an. This event means thatat the time one could encounter Abbasid soldiers in full control of territories that were located at a direct distance of almost 9500 km from one another (from the Maghreb coast of Northwestern Africa to Xi'an)! The infamous rebellion ended after much time passed and much blood was shed only to weaken the Tang monarchs.However, Tang dynasty marked an era of religious tolerance, cultural exchanges, Eurasiatic cosmopolitanism and numerous intermarriages. Sogdian merchants, Muslim soldiers and other foreigners significantly contributed to the Chinese civilization and became dignitaries of the imperial administration by learning Chinese, hiding their ethnic identity, and
  • 5. changing their names. The vicinity of Turan (the term denotes Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Siberia, Northern Asia, Mongolia and today's NW China) with the world of Islam was the reason for a) the conversion of many Turanians to Islam, b) the rise of many Turanian Muslim rulers in various lands of the Caliphate as far as Africa, and c) the flourishing trade routes across Central and Northern Asia. The formation and the magnificent expansion of the Turanian Islamic empires, which are falsely called 'Mongol' (the term denotes a military rank, not a historical nation) are not as spectacular and as fortuitous as depicted in the Western Orientalist bibliography. The Great State (Ulug Ulus) or 'Golden Horde' (Altın Urda) that controlled (1242–1502) all lands from Poland to the easternmost confines of Northern Asia is not the side effect of the division of the Turanian (: 'Mongol') Empire. It is the continuation of a millennium long Turanian prevalence across the said territories and the successor to numerous earlier empires involving the Xianbei Empire (93-234 CE), the Rouran Khaganate (330-555 CE), the Hunnic Empire (370–469), the Göktürk Khaganate (552-659 CE), the Eastern Turkic Khaganate (581-650 CE), the Western Turkic Khaganate (581–657),the Second Turkic Khaganate (682–744), the Uyghur Khaganate (744–840),the Yenisei Kyrgyz Khaganate (840-1207), the Liao Empire (916–1125)and the Khamag Empire (10th c. – 1206). During those ages, 'silk road trader', 'Turanian' and 'Muslim' became almost synonyms. Muslims played a great role in China's History at the times of Song dynasty (960- 1279; 宋朝), whereas at the times of the Mongol dynasty (1271-1368; the Great Yuan - 大元), following extensive intermarriages, they became a very important component of China's economic, social and intellectual life. As the fratricidal wars among Turanian nations intensified, Muslims and Chinese fought against the Mongols and some of China's most illustrious generals were Muslims indeed, like Lan Yu (藍玉). When the Mongols were finally kicked out of China, Hongwu (洪武), the founding emperor of the Ming dynasty (1368-1644; 大明), felt obliged to compose (1368) the celebrated Hundred-word Eulogy (bǎizìzàn: 百字讃) and thus express his great veneration of Prophet Muhammad, 'the most noble sage', as he described him. Hongwu found it also important to send a letter to John V Palaiologos and keep him informed about the rise of the Ming dynasty. Quite contrarily, Chinese Muslims, as Ming loyalists, suffered enormous losses at the times of Qing dynasty, which originated from the Manchu,a minority; this period marks however the progressive decline of all major Asiatic empires: the Ottomans, the Iranians, the Mughal Gorkanian (of India), and the Chinese. IV. The decline of the Islamic Empiresand of China overthe past four centuries The advent of Qing dynasty (1636-1912) ushered China in a new era that proved to be the worst page of China's 4000-year long History. Qing rulers' major counterparts in Asia and Africa were found in the same situation either their dynasty's origins go back to 1300 or their rule was established around 1500. Hong Taiji (皇太極),the founding emperor (1636-1643), was contemporaneous with - Shah-Jahan-i-Azam ( ‫شاہ‬‫جہان‬‫اعظم‬ : 1627-1658) of the Gurkanian Mongol ('Mughal') dynasty (who had the famous Taj Mahal mausoleum built), - Shah Safi ( ‫شاہ‬‫صف‬‫ی‬ : 1629-1642) of the Turkmen Safavid dynasty of Iran, and - Sultan Murad IV ( ‫مراد‬‫رابع‬ : 1623-1640) of the Ottoman Empire.
  • 6. A good indication of the minimal degree of threat discernment, friend-foe identification system, universal perspective, diplomatic diligence, and imperial preparation that characterized all four major Afro-Asiatic empires is the fact that Hong Taiji's reign coincided with the end of the 16-year long Ottoman–Safavid War (1623–1639) which dramatically weakened both empires. The Ottomans won and prevailed in Mesopotamia, but short term gains proved to be useless, as they could not ensure enduring strength. Hong Taiji's reign was also marked by two major events in the North of Asia: the rise of the Romanov dynasty under Michael I Romanov (Михаил Фёдорович Романов: 1613-1645)of Russia and the Russian expansion across Northern Siberia, afterthe collapse of the Sibir Khanate in 1598. The Russians reached the Pacific Ocean in 1639, decimating indigenous nations (Buryats; Yakuts; in the case of Chukchis, Koraks, Itelmens and Yukagirs, we attested a planned genocide) and spreading diseases (smallpox). Of course, the Kazakh Khanate was still strong under Salqam-Jangir Khan (1629–1680),but again the incessant wars among the Central Asiatic khanates (Bukhara, Tashkent,etc) created a worrisome situation not far from China's western borders. Another even graver problem for China and for the Central Asiatic khanates was the rise of the Buddhist Dzungar Khanate (1634) and the dreams of their ruler Erdeni Batur, who attempted to revive the gigantic state of Genghis Khan. The ceaseless wars between the Kazakhs and Dzungaria (1643–1756), as well as between Qing China and the Dzungars (1687–1757), ended with the Dzungar defeatand genocide but paved the way for Russian predominance across Northern Asia. No Asiatic empire benefited from these developments. Similar situations were attested in Southern Asia whereby the three Muslim emperors did not have the foresight to avoid divisions and fratricidal wars and to set up a common front against the seafaring empires, namely the Portuguese, the Dutch, the French and the English. It is true that the emergence of the Turkmen Safavids in Iran (with Shah Ismail I in 1502), the advent of the Mongol Gurkanian (with Babur in 1526) and the Ottoman rise in the East and expansion in Africa (from Egypt to Somalia to Algeria) under Yavuz Sultan Selim I (1512-1520) andhis successors occurred only on an extremely divided and diversified, almost millennium-long, background of Islamic faith and power. Only in its very early period, the Islamic Caliphate proved to be a centripetal force. However, when the Caliphs expanded beyond the borders of the Sassanid Empire (224-651) under Khusraw II (590/591-628),centrifugal forces prevailed only to prove that Central Asia and Carthage can never belong to the same empire - as already Darius I, the Achaemenidian (522-486), dreamt of but failed to implement. Furthermore, the prevalence of centrifugal forces within the immense Abbasid Empire was only a normal, historical phenomenon, because Islam was diffused among nations very far away from one another, with very different spiritual, cultural and historical backgrounds with which the proponents of the new faith were forced to interact in many dimensions. As early as the 10th century the contrast was enormous among Muslims in Andalusia, Egypt, Somalia, Yemen, Iran, India and Central Asia. To this testifies the enormous number of mystic brotherhoods, religious
  • 7. tariqas, philosophical doctrines, academic – scientific schools, literary styles, artistic and architectural rhythms, theological dogmas and systems of jurisprudence, which grew like mushrooms from Andalusia to Yemen to Central Asia, during the first 300 years of Islamic rule. Consequently, further divisions were to ensue. At the beginning of the 16th c., most of the Dravidian Deccan (Modern India's southern part) was divided among the Golconda Sultanate (Qutb Shahi dynasty / Shia), the Bijapur Sultanate (Adil Shahi dynasty / Shia), the Ahmednagar Sultanate (Nizam Shahi dynasty / Shia) and the Brahmani Sultanate (Barid Shahi dynasty / Sunni and Shia). This was not a particularity of the subcontinent only. The same multidivisional structure of the Deccan was attested across the Ocean in the Eastern African coast; the Sultanate of Ifat, the Adal Sultanate, the Warsangali Sultanate, the Sultanate of Mogadishu, the formidable Ajuran Sultanate, the Geledi Sultanate, the Kilwa Sultanate (whose seafarers were the first known to have reached Australia long before the English) and other smaller Eastern African principalities (Mombasa, Pemba, Zanzibar, Mafia, Comoro, Mozambique Island, etc.) existed and prospered for centuries, having always fully recognized the Caliph's authority without however becoming incorporated in the Caliphate stricto sensu. Some of the Somali sultanates were strong enough to oppose the Portuguese, and the history of Ajuran – Portuguese wars (16th – 17th c.) marks the first and perhaps the most epic page of the illustrious African anti-colonial fights. In many among the aforementioned cases, a Yemenite, an Iranian or a Turanian arrived in either the Deccan or Eastern Africa and they were easily accepted as rulers among the local Muslims. It was only after many decades and numerous wars that the Mongol Gurkanian authority managed to incorporate the Deccan sultanates in the Empire. And after Aurangzeb ( ‫اورنگ‬‫ز‬‫ی‬‫ب‬ : 1658-1707) the decline started. Many consider the Iranian invasion of the Mongol South Asiatic Empire, which was undertaken by the Turkmen Afshar Nader Shah ( ‫نادر‬‫شاہ‬‫افشار‬ : 1736-1747) in 1739, as the main reason for the subsequent collapse of the vast state of the Gurkanian whose formidable empire is fallaciously called 'Mughal India' by English Orientalists and historical forgers. The Iranian invasion, as well as the sack and the plunder of the Old Delhi, were a terrible hit, but they were not the main reason for the demise of the Gurkanian. As a matter of fact, the concessions made to the British East India Company and the farman issued by Farrukhsiyar ( ‫فرخ‬‫س‬‫ی‬‫ر‬ : 1713-1719), who allowed to English colonials the right to reside and trade in the Mughal Empire, were an inane and ominous decision. It was that cruel and criminal company that prepared the final collapse of the greatest South Asiatic Empire of all times and deposed Bahadur Shah II, the last Mongol Emperor, in 1862, i.e. 145 years afterhis idiotic and pathetic predecessor offered them the aforementioned privileges. As the Gurkanian Mongol power was dissolved, it was easy for the criminal colonials of England to start the Opium Wars (1839-1860) against China. However, all major Afro-Asiatic empires, the Ottomans,the Safavids, the Gurkanian and the Qing failed to assess – already in the 17th c. as they should have had – the real nature, the scope, the targets, the profits and the consequences of the phenomenal company, which was incorporated in 1602 and started being active from
  • 8. India to Japan as early as 1608-1609: the Dutch East India Company. Seeking concessions and imperial protection, safe passages, and legal presence, the Dutch generated enormous profits, which if known and analyzed would surely be perceived as a threat for the Mughal durbar. The Dutch were present in Gujarat (Suratte,1616), Malabar (1661), Coromandel (1608), Bengal (1627) and also in Sri Lanka (1640), but their enormous benefits and the ensued antagonism with other powers (Denmark, France and England) were not perceived as real threats by the Mongol Gurkanian. Quite contrarily, they willingly entered into compromises with the company, only because they were not strong on the sea. Even worse, they failed to monitor, examine and assess the groundbreaking company's potentialities, the real intentions behind it, the wealth accumulated due to multiple factors (the spice trade monopoly being only one), and the deriving threats for the Mughal Empire. Each and every time, the Mughal palatial administration dealt with the symptoms and not with the root causes, which they had not even imagined, let alone identified. The same attitude characterized the Qing, the Safavids and the Ottomans in their relations with either this company or other Western European corporations and schemes. As a matter of fact, the Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie (VOC) consisted in a hitherto unknown form of expansion in which individual zeal, personal risk, human fascination with extraordinary material wealth,private entrepreneurship,and corporate systematization preceded all forms of military aggression and state conflict; this concept spearheaded a new type of expansionism that had cataclysmic impact and deteriorated all aspects of military conflict and cruelty. In fact, it was a state within a state or, if you want, a CorporNation. Even worse, it weaponized knowledge, thus totally altering and distorting the foundations of scholarly research, academic study, and human exploration that were historically accepted by all cultures and civilizations worldwide until that time. Quite unfortunately, this was not noticed by any Afro-Asiatic imperial establishment – even at a moment they were still omnipotent. The Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb (1658–1707) is an excellent example in this regard; he was contemporaneous with - the Ottoman sultans and Caliphs Mehmed IV (1648-1687),Suleyman II (1687-1691), Ahmed II (1691-1695), Mustafa II (1695-1703), and Ahmed III (1703-1730), - the Safavid shahs of Iran Abbas II (1642-1666), Suleyman I (1666-1694), and the last Safavid, Sultan Husayn (1694-1722),and - the Qing Emperors Shunzhi (1644-1661) and Kangxi (1662-1722). None of these imperial establishments, which were still quite powerful, was able to either be informed about the publication in Holland of the monumental series of volumes of Hortus Malabaricus (1678–1693) or grasp its real meaning and grave consequences. Never before had specialized knowledge acquired such pre-eminence among a state's priorities in view of future profit. Detailed and exact science was not anymore a scholarly endeavor but a corporate, entrepreneurial task. And who was the author of the grand opus? None other than Hendrik van Rheede (1636–1691), the Governor of Dutch Malabar atthe time! I can understand that the Ottomans, the Safavids and the Qing were not directly involved; but the highly educated Aurangzeb whose name means "the Ornamentof
  • 9. the Throne" and whose royal title was Alamgir ("Conqueror of the World" in Farsi) should have got due information about this great work and should have assessed it as a real weapon against his own throne. Hortus Malabaricus is an enormous treatise about the flora of Malabar, a territory that corresponds to present day India's Kerala and Karnataka. With this treatise, an average Dutch in Amsterdam would know the flora of Kerala better than the emperor in whose state Kerala belonged. Thus, Natural Sciences became a tool for further corporate profit. Weaponized knowledge and far-fetched explorations, pioneering fieldwork, archaeological excavations, antiques collections, a great number of monument purchasing diplomats, and entire armies of 'arrogant connoisseurs' would soon be unleashed against the four Afro-Asiatic empires. A real scramble for manuscripts, inscriptions, bas-reliefs, coins and bronzes would then take place. This would bring forth a hitherto unseen form of conquest and occupation. That's why modern historians, who focus on 18th c. and 19th c. Ottoman –Iranian wars (1730-1736 between the Ottomans Ahmed III and Mahmud I and the last Safavid shah Tahmasp II, Abbas III, and Nader Shah of Iran; 1743-1746 between Mahmud I and Nader Shah; 1775-1776 between Abdulhamid I and Karim Khan Zend; 1821-1823 between Mahmud II and Fath Ali Shah of the Turkmen Qajar dynasty) to find the reasons of the Western European powers' meteoric rise at the world stage during the 19th and the 20th centuries, really miss the point. As a matter of fact, the real battles were engaged not in the war fronts but in caves, archaeological sites, libraries, museums, European universities' Oriental departments, and the personal cabinets of professors and decipherers who decoded ancient signs that were tragically meaningless and disastrously useless to the Sultans, the Shahs, the Gurkanian and the Qing. The deciphermentof ancient scripts was completed with the formulation of a fallacious World History, which was meticulously preconceived as per the arrogant connoisseurs' interests, worldview and discriminatory attitude toward the rest. Then,colonial diplomats, military regiments, various agents, indigenous traitors, corrupt businessmen, and local puppets undertook the enduring work of imposing this fallacious World History on local populations by means of Education, Culture, Publications, and Mass Media. Indiscriminately, from Morocco to China, all alternatives were used to alter natives. (to be continued)