An adaptive system for empowering amputees return to vehicular machine operation. Designed predominantly for farmers, also may help manual laborers of various types overcome occupational challenges after having lost a limb. Ongoing project from Mechanical Engineering Capstone at Northeastern University.
4. “Hook & ring”
“Problems tightly gripping controls”
-NUPOC Field Survey
No quick release method from wheel.
Current Solution
5. As technology advances, complexity increases and so does cost
Occupational needs of farmers:
• Less fragility
• Battery-life independent
• Self-serviceability
• Affordability out of pocket
8. Customer Feedback (Rumford, ME)
“I’d be very interested in using something like this. I’d also use it for my truck!”
9. Market Statistics
# of U.S. Farmers?
Likelihood of injury
farming?
# of people living in
US with an
amputation today?
21 million
2 million
2.5x > than any
other outdoor occupation
11. 22%
11%
21%
23%
6%
17%
Amputation Frequency by Industry
Agriculture
Construction
Manufacturing
Transportation &
Utilities
Mining
Other
More Markets for Adaptive Driving?
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2007)
14. Team
Andrew Waite
M.S. M.E. ’15
Design & 3D modeling
Jacob Cohen B.S.M.E. ‘15
Machinist, Material Science
Industry: MD&D Danny Walsh, B.S.M.E. ‘15
Medical Device R&D Engineer Coop
Candidate for M.B.A. 2017
Jon Leydon
B.S. M.E. ’15
Hardware/Design
Carly Gajewski
B.S. M.E. ’15
Biosurgery
So we call ourselves the farm arm, and today we are here to talk about a prosthetic adaptor system for farm machinery
And we are here to learn today as much as you are, so please feel free to interrupt us at any point
Outline: 20 minutes present, 5 minute video, then we want to hear feedback from you with questions and answers
This presentation assumes our audience will be independent living activists, a lot of disabled farmers, and agrability specialists:
Tips form TechStars
BULLET POINTS KILL, PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE
People READ OR LISTEN, NOT BOTH
DON’T NEGELECT SHEAR STUPIDITY OF AUDIENCE -> DUMB DOWN
While 4 months wasn’t enough time to compete in a crowded marketspace, a trend we saw was that there were underserved needs for prostheses in agriculture
Stumbled upon NUPOC research - 1/10 farmers suffersome sort of amputation in their lifetime (you all know this 2003) – National Safety Council
For those that were able to peruse the AgrAbility Harvest, the aggregation of findings is right in alignment with our own research (thank Paul Jones)
Farmers use agricultural machinery and at the same time, farming is very dangerous, so what options does a farmer have?
SHOW HAPPY FARMER AND FAMILY
Functionally, we needed our design to 1) transmit force effectively 2) enable a quick transition 3) prove durable to wear 4) accomodate various ctrl interfaces 5) and be safe
Biomechanics also played a critical role.
For the lost rotation about the forearm and articulation about the wrist. We needed to ensure a relevant ROM is still possible for the task without requiring any unnatural body positioning (a subject my compensate with lateral flexion of the trunk that contorts the spine placing a risk of nerve damage).
We needed geometry to allow for ROM at the interface,
emulate the biomechanical length & weight of the opposite limb,
Make sure there is a system for knowing when engaged with the control
So here is our solution, the key technology is geometry to accommodate quick operation of controls
Not connect or require voluntary grasping – intuitive
Terminal device connects onto existing wrist unit and adaptor mounts onto machine controls
So we brought it to a farm in ME to test it out
Thanks maine agrability Lani and ??
VT agrability for chatting over the phone
Therese Vilkomm of AtinNH
1. http://www.amputee-coalition.org/limb-loss-resource-center/resources-by-topic/limb-loss-statistics/limb-loss-statistics/#1
2. American farm bureau federation
http://www.fb.org/index.php?fuseaction=newsroom.fastfacts
3. Dangerous jobs (Fishing Most dangerous, construction workers, farmers, mining)
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18b.htm
Explain liftime discrepancy
SRP $400 vs. $100
BTE amputees with workers compensation, medicare, or 2nd party insurance
Combat veterans returning to agriculture? Construction? trucking
Excavators and other machinery
EFFICIENCY OF TIME, ERROR, AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Bob, pioneer of body power, had material ideas to reduce cost
Jay explained how PCP prescribe solutions using a standard catalog – best way to get it to people is though commercial MFG
No myoelectrics and no pre-hension necessary
Because of this, design is very simple and thus much more affordable to those without insurance ($500)
Task-specific nature
Org Structure? Background? Complementation?
VA?
Segway to video
Hand overlaid w/ image
Connection w/ prosthetic socket: industry standard connections including ½”-20 thread or quick-release part
Mention considered design features: compliant wrist and maybe anisotropic frictional surfaces
Force transmission
Hard stop
Self-centered
Angular deviation tolerance
Rotational freedom
Change to White Adapter
Balance cost & durability
We wanted to make things a bit cheaper for manufacturing
Do it by part
Important material properties
Yield strength
Wear resistance
Fatigue strength
Density
Cost
Manufacturability
Here is the system we are designing for mounting onto controls
Proof of concept with cheap items at home depot
Confirmed viability
Refined designChose terminus angle
Established adapter angular tolerance