This report is ECF’s second calculation of the internal and external bene ts of cycling linked to the current level of cycling in the EU-28. It is an extended and updated version of the rst report published in 2013. The calculations have been updated with the latest available gures; in some cases, the methodologies for calculating the bene ts have been re ned taking into account the feedback received; and more bene ts have been added in a systematic way, following the development of the active mobility agenda during the last years.
Summing up the calculated and estimated bene ts of cycling in all these sectors, we arrive at the following aggregate gures:
In some areas, we have identi ed bene ts of cycling but were not able to give any calculation or estimation yet. More qualitative and quantitative research is needed in those elds to quantify these bene t. The aim of this report is therefore also to encourage further research on the subject in order to draw a more precise picture of the economic bene ts of cycling in the future.
The present report clearly shows the bene ts of the Active Mobility Agenda not only for further research, but also for well-structured advocacy and agenda setting in policy. In particular for the European policy cycling appears not only in speci c, isolated elds like trans- port or environmental policy, but in many other areas where the EU has competences as well, like industrial policy, employment, health and social policy. This makes the case for an integrated EU cycling strategy that includes these elds and considers cycling in all relevant policy areas and will therefore enable the whole EU to reap the bene ts if cycling in the future.
The European Union and the African Union: A statistical portraitGildas Nzingoula
Africa’s continental integration has become a key priority for both the African Union and the EU. The new Pan-African Programme will provide a major contribution to the EUAfrica Partnership, which the two continents established in 2007 with the Joint Africa-EU Strategy (JAES), to put their relations on a new footing. The programme will be a key instrument for the European Union to implement, in close cooperation with African partners, the joint political priorities of the roadmap which was adopted by African and EU Heads of State and Government during the 4th EU-Africa summit in April 2014.
Implementing cohesion policy, by Peter Heil and Tibor Polgar, at the workshop organised by SIGMA in Podgorica on 23-24 June 2015, the objective of which is to provide the relevant national authorities with an overview of the EU's cohesion policy (Chapter 22). For further information please contact: klas.klaas@oecd.org.
The European Union and the African Union: A statistical portraitGildas Nzingoula
Africa’s continental integration has become a key priority for both the African Union and the EU. The new Pan-African Programme will provide a major contribution to the EUAfrica Partnership, which the two continents established in 2007 with the Joint Africa-EU Strategy (JAES), to put their relations on a new footing. The programme will be a key instrument for the European Union to implement, in close cooperation with African partners, the joint political priorities of the roadmap which was adopted by African and EU Heads of State and Government during the 4th EU-Africa summit in April 2014.
Implementing cohesion policy, by Peter Heil and Tibor Polgar, at the workshop organised by SIGMA in Podgorica on 23-24 June 2015, the objective of which is to provide the relevant national authorities with an overview of the EU's cohesion policy (Chapter 22). For further information please contact: klas.klaas@oecd.org.
About 250 million Europeans already cycle, and that’s good news. Not just for the environment and from many social perspectives, but for Europe’s economy too. Cycling helps establish a healthier and more productive society through higher physical activity, less congestion and more jobs (in the bicycle industry or in the booming cycling tourism sector). It currently creates an economic benefit of € 210 billion. Year after year. The European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF) unites cyclists’ associations from across the globe, giving them a voice on the international level. Our mission is simple: more people cycling more often.
This ECF European Parliament Manifesto lists 10 key areas where we recommend the EU institutions to take decisive action to contribute to this objective. Make a difference too by actively sponsoring at least one of these 10 goals!
Cycling work: jobs and job creation in the cycling economyEuroVelo
Cycling work: job and jobs creation in the cycling economy.
Cycling generates more jobs in Europe that mining and cycling tourism is a big slice of the cake. EuroVelo, a great opportunity for business, growth and jobs creation.
In reaction to the global financial and economic crisis that started in 2008, job creation has become a main priority of EU policy. In this context, ECF has decided to commission academic consultancy Transport & Mobility Leuven to carry out a study that quantifies the contribution of the cycling sector to job creation in Europe.
Ahead of the publication of this year's country recommendations for the European Semester, this paper identifies priorities and modalities for the reform of the Semester so that it becomes a key instrument for operationalising the SDGs and implementing the European Green Deal at Member State level.
Used by euxtra.com as information to its user. PDF file created by and on the behalf of the European Commission.
Source:http://ec.europa.eu/youth/pdf/doc599_en.pdf
Synergies between ESIF funds, Horizon 2020 and other research programmesParma Couture
Improving linkages between various EU Funds is the best way to enhance the impact of research and innovation (R&I) investments. By coordinating different forms of support, these links help creating competitiveness, jobs and growth in the EU by combining, for example, European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), Horizon 2020 and other EU R&I instruments. Such a cross-cutting approach will be beneficial for gaining international quality of R&I projects, particularly in this area, where the EU is competing on the global stage.
To make these linkages a reality, national and regional authorities involved in the implementation of ESIF programmes focusing on research, innovation and competitiveness must seize the opportunity to ensure coordination and complementarities with instruments like Horizon 2020, COSME, Erasmus+, CreativeEurope and the Connecting Europe Facility. This means joint efforts at EU, national and regional levels in boosting the quality of programmes to achieve better results and higher impacts of the investments.
The European Commission has published guidance for policy-makers and implementing bodies on synergies between the different EU programmes investing into research, innovation and competitiveness, providing possible scenarios for their application in practice.
Strategy Document
Tourism is a fundamental economic sector both at European and international level. Agenda 21,
elaborated during the Environment and Development Conference held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and adopted by 173 countries, recognises the importance of this theme at global level and
outlines an action plan linking tourism to sustainable development.
Différents points de vue sur le MaaS (Mobility as a Service). Présentation dans le cadre de la formation Ouishare - CEREMA "Faire du MaaS un levier de politiques publiques"
https://www.ouishare.net/events/faire-du-concept-maas-un-levier-de-politiques-publiques
Mobility as Networks - Challenge transport Erasme du Grand Lyon - 8 janvier 2018Ghislain Delabie
À l'occasion du lancement du challenge transport ERASME - Tùba - Grand Lyon, cette intervention basée sur les travaux de Mobility as Networks souligne quelques défis posés à des équipes voulant innover sur les mobilités :
- Comprendre le système dans lequel nous évoluons, et le territoire, qui favorisent essentiellement la voiture individuelle
- Imaginer de nouveaux modèles, de nouvelles alliances pour changer de paradigme
- Mettre le design et l'innovation au service de grands enjeux qui en vaillent la peine, et en faire un outil pour le bonheur des individus
Pour aller plus loin :
www.mobilityasnetworks.eu
www.erasme.org/Challenge-transport-1850
www.le-lab.org
More Related Content
Similar to The EU cycling economy - Arguments for an integrated EU cycling policy
About 250 million Europeans already cycle, and that’s good news. Not just for the environment and from many social perspectives, but for Europe’s economy too. Cycling helps establish a healthier and more productive society through higher physical activity, less congestion and more jobs (in the bicycle industry or in the booming cycling tourism sector). It currently creates an economic benefit of € 210 billion. Year after year. The European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF) unites cyclists’ associations from across the globe, giving them a voice on the international level. Our mission is simple: more people cycling more often.
This ECF European Parliament Manifesto lists 10 key areas where we recommend the EU institutions to take decisive action to contribute to this objective. Make a difference too by actively sponsoring at least one of these 10 goals!
Cycling work: jobs and job creation in the cycling economyEuroVelo
Cycling work: job and jobs creation in the cycling economy.
Cycling generates more jobs in Europe that mining and cycling tourism is a big slice of the cake. EuroVelo, a great opportunity for business, growth and jobs creation.
In reaction to the global financial and economic crisis that started in 2008, job creation has become a main priority of EU policy. In this context, ECF has decided to commission academic consultancy Transport & Mobility Leuven to carry out a study that quantifies the contribution of the cycling sector to job creation in Europe.
Ahead of the publication of this year's country recommendations for the European Semester, this paper identifies priorities and modalities for the reform of the Semester so that it becomes a key instrument for operationalising the SDGs and implementing the European Green Deal at Member State level.
Used by euxtra.com as information to its user. PDF file created by and on the behalf of the European Commission.
Source:http://ec.europa.eu/youth/pdf/doc599_en.pdf
Synergies between ESIF funds, Horizon 2020 and other research programmesParma Couture
Improving linkages between various EU Funds is the best way to enhance the impact of research and innovation (R&I) investments. By coordinating different forms of support, these links help creating competitiveness, jobs and growth in the EU by combining, for example, European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), Horizon 2020 and other EU R&I instruments. Such a cross-cutting approach will be beneficial for gaining international quality of R&I projects, particularly in this area, where the EU is competing on the global stage.
To make these linkages a reality, national and regional authorities involved in the implementation of ESIF programmes focusing on research, innovation and competitiveness must seize the opportunity to ensure coordination and complementarities with instruments like Horizon 2020, COSME, Erasmus+, CreativeEurope and the Connecting Europe Facility. This means joint efforts at EU, national and regional levels in boosting the quality of programmes to achieve better results and higher impacts of the investments.
The European Commission has published guidance for policy-makers and implementing bodies on synergies between the different EU programmes investing into research, innovation and competitiveness, providing possible scenarios for their application in practice.
Strategy Document
Tourism is a fundamental economic sector both at European and international level. Agenda 21,
elaborated during the Environment and Development Conference held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and adopted by 173 countries, recognises the importance of this theme at global level and
outlines an action plan linking tourism to sustainable development.
Différents points de vue sur le MaaS (Mobility as a Service). Présentation dans le cadre de la formation Ouishare - CEREMA "Faire du MaaS un levier de politiques publiques"
https://www.ouishare.net/events/faire-du-concept-maas-un-levier-de-politiques-publiques
Mobility as Networks - Challenge transport Erasme du Grand Lyon - 8 janvier 2018Ghislain Delabie
À l'occasion du lancement du challenge transport ERASME - Tùba - Grand Lyon, cette intervention basée sur les travaux de Mobility as Networks souligne quelques défis posés à des équipes voulant innover sur les mobilités :
- Comprendre le système dans lequel nous évoluons, et le territoire, qui favorisent essentiellement la voiture individuelle
- Imaginer de nouveaux modèles, de nouvelles alliances pour changer de paradigme
- Mettre le design et l'innovation au service de grands enjeux qui en vaillent la peine, et en faire un outil pour le bonheur des individus
Pour aller plus loin :
www.mobilityasnetworks.eu
www.erasme.org/Challenge-transport-1850
www.le-lab.org
Communiqué de presse Réinventer Paris 2 - Accompagnement maîtrise d'ouvrageGhislain Delabie
OuiShare assistera la Ville de Paris et ses partenaires dans l'évaluation et le renforcement des propositions d'innovations des projets soumis dans le cadre de Réinventer Paris 2 - Les dessous de Paris
ACV des véhicules électriques et thermiques aux US - MITGhislain Delabie
Étude du MIT comparant les émissions de gaz à effet de serre (en équivalent CO2) des véhicules disponibles sur le marché américain, en fonction du mix énergétique de l'électricité alimentant les véhicules.
Étude comparative de véhicules électriques et thermiques sur leur cycle de vie (ACV) : impacts environnementaux et émissions de gaz à effets de serre.
Conclusion : les véhicules électriques qui roulent suffisamment apportent de vrais bénéfices. D'autant plus dans le contexte d'un mix énergétique décarboné (ex : France)
Transport for Cairo - "Vers une plateforme de données collaborative et ouverte"Ghislain Delabie
Présentation de Mohamed Hegazi lors de l'évènement "Vers une plateforme de données collaborative et ouverte"
Comment utiliser l'Open Data pour mapper les réseaux de transport informel au Caire et en faire un atout pour le système de transport.
This paper aims to examine the links between consumer behavior and the mode of transportation used to access local destinations with the greater goal of providing the empirical evidence needed to inform decision making and educate the public. The findings presented here are the result of the first study of this type and scale in the United States. We limit our scope to the examination of the relationships between consumer expenditures and their trip making behavior, including mode of travel and frequency of trips. This analysis is guided by the following objectives: 1) quantifying the various transportation mode shares of customers for a variety of business types, locations and transportation contexts; and 2) comparing levels of consumer spending & frequency of visits by travel modes. This analysis made use of intercept surveys of local business completed at 78 establishments in the Portland metropolitan area. The findings support the notion that customers that arrive by modes other than the automobile are competitive consumers, spending similar amounts or more, on average, than their counterparts using automobiles. They are also more frequent patrons on average, presenting perhaps a unique marketing opportunity for these businesses.
Apporter des solutions de mobilité en rural et périurbain - Association des...Ghislain Delabie
Conférence sur l'île de Ré (l'AUTIR - Association des Usagers des Transports de l'Île de Ré) pour aborder les pratiques et les particularités d'un territoire peu dense, habité à l'année par des résidents plutôt très motorisés, avec une occupation estivale très forte et des besoins spécifiques
Évaluation économique du vélo - Région de Bruxelles - CapitaleGhislain Delabie
Une politique du vélo ambitieuse est favorable à la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale
C’est le principal constat de l’analyse de deux types d’effets économiques.
La première analyse a révélé le fait qu’une politique vélo ambitieuse menée d’ici 2020 au sein de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale permettrait un gain pour la société de 300 à 550 millions selon les scénarios et les hypothèses retenus. Les bénéfices d’une politique ambitieuse d’ici 2020 seraient de 8 à 19 fois plus importants que les coûts.
En 2012 déjà, le vélo induit des bénéfices à hauteur de 100 à 200 millions selon les scénarios et hypothèses. Les bénéfices du vélo sont 5 à 9 fois plus élevés que les coûts.
Les avantages pour la santé, pour l’environnement, pour la congestion, les économies dans le budget des ménages, les économies dans le financement des transports publics et l’éventuelle diminution des accidents de la circulation sont pris en compte en tant que bénéfices dans l’évaluation des rapports coûts/bénéfices.
Les dépenses publiques supplémentaires pour encourager le vélo ainsi que les accidents de la circulation occasionnés par une plus large pratique du vélo sont quant à eux considérés comme des coûts.
Globalement, les bénéfices l’emportent sur les coûts dans l’ensemble des scénarios analysés et ce malgré le fait que nous ne nous intéressions qu’aux effets monétarisables. A titre d’exemple, les effets du vélo sur la qualité de la vie en ville ou sur le bien-être psychologique des individus ne sont pas pris en considération dans la mesure où leur quantification et leur monétarisation sont très compliquées.
La deuxième analyse met en évidence le fait que le vélo génère de l’activité et donc de l’emploi à Bruxelles. Cependant, l’effet net sur l’économie n’est pas développé dans cette étude.
Le vélo utilitaire génère à l’heure actuelle plus de 200 emplois à Bruxelles et ce chiffre pourrait monter à 700 en 2020 dans le cadre d’une politique de mobilité et de soutien du vélo ambitieuse.
Ces analyses sont basées sur des méthodes économiques classiques appliquées sur les données disponibles et reposent sur des hypothèses explicites.
Developper la marche en ville : pourquoi et comment ? CERTUGhislain Delabie
Il existe aujourd’hui de multiples initiatives en faveur du développement de la marche : plans nationaux, campagnes de sensibilisation, plans d’actions de collectivités. Elles rappellent que ce développement est désormais un objectif commun poursuivi par les ministères respectivement en charge du développement durable et de
la santé, par un nombre croissant de collectivités et par le milieu associatif. Elles se développent dans un contexte européen et international marqué par un regain d’intérêt pour cette thématique, redevenue un objet de recherches et de recommandations après
une longue période d’oubli.
L'amélioration de la qualité de l’air liée à la baisse des émissions poursuit une progression amorcée il y a plusieurs années. Les concentrations moyennes de polluants diminuent et les dépassements des normes pour la protection de la santé concernent moins de zones. Ces améliorations sont cependant fragiles car elles dépendent pour partie des conditions météorologiques.
Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of diseaseGhislain Delabie
This report presents a summary of methods and results of the latest World Health Organi- zation (WHO) global assessment of ambient air pollution exposure and the resulting burden of disease.
Air pollution has become a growing concern in the past few years, with an increasing number of acute air pollution episodes in many cities worldwide. As a result, data on air quality is becoming increasingly available and the science underlying the related health impacts is also evolving rapidly.
To date, air pollution – both ambient (outdoor) and household (indoor) – is the biggest envi- ronmental risk to health, carrying responsibility for about one in every nine deaths annually. Ambient (outdoor) air pollution alone kills around 3 million people each year, mainly from noncommunicable diseases. Only one person in ten lives in a city that complies with the WHO Air quality guidelines. Air pollution continues to rise at an alarming rate, and affects econo- mies and people’s quality of life; it is a public health emergency.
Interventions and policies for tackling air pollu- tion issues exist and have been proven to be effective. The implementation of WHO resolution WHA68.8, which maps out a road map for en- hanced global responses to the adverse effects of air pollution, provides an essential framework for decision-makers to choose and implement the most ef cient policies.
Air pollution has also been identi ed as a global health priority in the sustainable development agenda. WHO has responsibility for stewarding three air pollution-related indicators for monito- ring progress against the Sustainable Develop- ment Goals (SDGs): in health (Goal 3), in cities (Goal 11) and in energy (Goal 7).
Air pollution affects practically all countries in the world and all parts of society.
The role of the health sector is crucial, and there is a need to engage with other sectors to maxi- mize the co-bene ts of health, climate, environ- ment, social and development. Saving people’s lives is the overarching aim to implement policies aiming at tackling air pollution in the health, trans- port, energy, and urban development sectors.
Synthèse - Impacts de l'exposition chronique aux particules fines sur la mort...Ghislain Delabie
Au niveau mondial, la pollution de l'air est désormais la première cause environnementale de mort prématurée, devant les problèmes d’hygiène et les problèmes d’approvisionnement en eau potable [1]. L’exposition à des polluants de l’air favorise le développement de pathologies chroniques graves, en particulier des pathologies cardiovasculaires, respiratoires et des cancers. Un nombre croissant d’études pointent également des impacts par exemple sur les troubles de la reproduction, des troubles du développement de l’enfant, des maladies endocriniennes ou encore neurologiques (figure 1).
La contribution de la pollution de l’air au développement de ces pathologies, notamment cardiorespiratoires, et cancers se traduit par une augmentation de la mortalité, une baisse de l’espérance de vie, et un recours accru aux soins. Les impacts des particules fines (PM) sur le recours aux soins et la mortalité sont bien documentés par de nombreuses études épidémiologiques [2-6] et un lien causal entre l’exposition à ces polluants et la mortalité est désormais admis par la communauté scientifique [7;8]. La pollution de l’air est ainsi un facteur de risque environnemental qui a un impact avéré sur la santé, qui touche l’ensemble de la population, pour lequel il n’existe pas de mesures de protection individuelles simples et acceptables, mais dont les niveaux peuvent être baissés par des mesures collectives.
Impacts de l'exposition chronique aux particules fines sur la mortalité en Fr...Ghislain Delabie
Au niveau mondial, la pollution de l'air est désormais la première cause environnementale de mort prématurée, devant les problèmes d’hygiène et les problèmes d’approvisionnement en eau potable [1]. L’exposition à des polluants de l’air favorise le développement de pathologies chroniques graves, en particulier des pathologies cardiovasculaires, respiratoires et des cancers. Un nombre croissant d’études pointent également des impacts par exemple sur les troubles de la reproduction, des troubles du développement de l’enfant, des maladies endocriniennes ou encore neurologiques (figure 1).
La contribution de la pollution de l’air au développement de ces pathologies, notamment cardiorespiratoires, et cancers se traduit par une augmentation de la mortalité, une baisse de l’espérance de vie, et un recours accru aux soins. Les impacts des particules fines (PM) sur le recours aux soins et la mortalité sont bien documentés par de nombreuses études épidémiologiques [2-6] et un lien causal entre l’exposition à ces polluants et la mortalité est désormais admis par la communauté scientifique [7;8]. La pollution de l’air est ainsi un facteur de risque environnemental qui a un impact avéré sur la santé, qui touche l’ensemble de la population, pour lequel il n’existe pas de mesures de protection individuelles simples et acceptables, mais dont les niveaux peuvent être baissés par des mesures collectives.
Rapport Véhicule autonome et transports publics - CGI 2017Ghislain Delabie
Rapport remis au CGI en mai 2017 : "Quel impact des véhicules autonomes sur le Grand Paris", les transports publics, les territoires, l'urbanisme et la fiscalité ?
Ce rapport est une première étape, il prend comme point de départ la disponibilité de véhicules entièrement autonomes et cherche à en évaluer les conséquences et les impacts.
Ce travail sera poursuivi par des travaux de recherche plus approfondis
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Donate to charity during this holiday seasonSERUDS INDIA
For people who have money and are philanthropic, there are infinite opportunities to gift a needy person or child a Merry Christmas. Even if you are living on a shoestring budget, you will be surprised at how much you can do.
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-to-donate-to-charity-during-this-holiday-season/
#charityforchildren, #donateforchildren, #donateclothesforchildren, #donatebooksforchildren, #donatetoysforchildren, #sponsorforchildren, #sponsorclothesforchildren, #sponsorbooksforchildren, #sponsortoysforchildren, #seruds, #kurnool
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
Preliminary findings _OECD field visits to ten regions in the TSI EU mining r...OECDregions
Preliminary findings from OECD field visits for the project: Enhancing EU Mining Regional Ecosystems to Support the Green Transition and Secure Mineral Raw Materials Supply.
Working with data is a challenge for many organizations. Nonprofits in particular may need to collect and analyze sensitive, incomplete, and/or biased historical data about people. In this talk, Dr. Cori Faklaris of UNC Charlotte provides an overview of current AI capabilities and weaknesses to consider when integrating current AI technologies into the data workflow. The talk is organized around three takeaways: (1) For better or sometimes worse, AI provides you with “infinite interns.” (2) Give people permission & guardrails to learn what works with these “interns” and what doesn’t. (3) Create a roadmap for adding in more AI to assist nonprofit work, along with strategies for bias mitigation.
A Guide to AI for Smarter Nonprofits - Dr. Cori Faklaris, UNC Charlotte
The EU cycling economy - Arguments for an integrated EU cycling policy
1. The EU Cycling Economy 1
www.ecf.com
THE EU CYCLING ECONOMY
Arguments for an integrated EU cycling policy
2. 2 The EU Cycling Economy
RESPONSIBLE EDITOR
European Cyclists’ Federation asbl
Rue Franklin 28
B-1000 Brussels
office@ecf.com
1 December 2016
COVER PHOTO
by 'piranka' at www.istockphoto.com
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank the whole ECF community, and in particular the Advisory Board of the Scientists for Cycling
network, for working on the Active Mobility Agenda during the last decade. This builds the base without which the
elaboration of this report would not have been possible.
CITATION
Neun, M. and Haubold, H. 2016. The EU Cycling Economy – Arguments for an integrated EU cycling policy.
European Cyclists’ Federation, Brussels, December 2016
ECF gratefully acknowledges financial support from the European Commission.
The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither
the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information
contained therein.
About ECF
The European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF) is an umbrella federation for national cycling organisations (organisations that promote
bicycle use in the context of mobility) throughout Europe. Today, ECF represents over half a million people in 45 countries.
It has pledged to ensure that bicycle use achieves its fullest potential so as to bring about sustainable mobility and public
well-being. To achieve these aims, ECF seeks to change attitudes, policies and budget allocations at the European level. ECF will
stimulate and organise the exchange of information and expertise on bicycle related transport policies and strategies as well as
the work of cyclists’ movements.
In order to get better conditions for cyclists throughout Europe and to get more people cycling, more often, ECF actively advo-
cates for cycling at the European institutional level. ECF recognises the important funding opportunities at this level and active-
ly works towards securing the best deal for cycling. Ensuring that policy-makers are aware of the benefits of cycling and that
policies mention bicycle transport and make the right funds available to its development is one set of priorities of ECF’s work.
Maximising the benefit of the available funds to cycling and making sure that these funds materialise into concrete results on
the ground throughout Europe is another. It is with this in mind that this guide on EU funding opportunities was put together.
3. The EU Cycling Economy 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
INTRODUCTION 5
1. Contribution to the EU cycling strategy and global perspectives 5
2. Context: The active mobility agenda as an evaluation matrix 5
DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITS 8
I. Environment and climate 8
II. Energy and resources 9
III. Health benefits 9
IV. Microeconomic benefits 11
V. Technology and Design 11
VI. Time and Space 12
VII. Social Affairs 12
VIII.Mobility 13
IX. Bringing people together - diversity of cycling cultures 13
CONCLUSIONS 14
1. Background 14
2. Discussion of results 14
3. Need for further research 14
4. 4 The EU Cycling Economy
FOREWORD
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Dear Reader,
We are happy to present to you the second, revised and expanded version of ECF’s report on the economic benefits of cycling in the
EU. Since the first publication in 2013, continuous efforts have been made both to quantify the positive effects of cycling on society,
the environment and the economy, to refine methodologies, and to elaborate a systematic classification of these effects in line with the
Active Mobility Agenda.
The present report clearly shows that the benefits of cycling occur not only in specific, isolated fields like transport or environmental
policy, but in many other areas where the EU has competences as well, like industrial policy, employment, health and social policy. An
integrated EU cycling strategy that includes these fields and considers cycling in all relevant policy areas will therefore enable the whole
EU to reap these benefits in the future, including the countries which currently have low rates of cycling.
At the ECF, we continue to work towards these goals and we are convinced that the present report makes a compelling case both for
more investment in cycling as well as a for a coordinated cycling policy at all levels of governance, including the European.
Ádám Bodor
ECF Advocacy Director
This report is ECF’s second calculation of the internal and external benefits of cycling linked to the current level of cycling in the EU-28.
It is an extended and updated version of the first report published in 2013. The calculations have been updated with the latest available
figures; in some cases, the methodologies for calculating the benefits have been refined taking into account the feedback received; and
more benefits have been added in a systematic way, following the development of the active mobility agenda during the last years.
Summing up the calculated and estimated benefits of cycling in all these sectors, we arrive at the following aggregate figures:
Calculations based on
concrete evidence
Calculations based on
best available data
Estimations based on
best available indications
Total value
239.99 bn € 90.7 bn € 182.5 bn € 513.19 bn €
In some areas, we have identified benefits of cycling but were not able to give any calculation or estimation yet. More qualitative and
quantitative research is needed in those fields to quantify these benefit. The aim of this report is therefore also to encourage further
research on the subject in order to draw a more precise picture of the economic benefits of cycling in the future.
The present report clearly shows the benefits of the Active Mobility Agenda not only for further research, but also for well-structured
advocacy and agenda setting in policy. In particular for the European policy cycling appears not only in specific, isolated fields like trans-
port or environmental policy, but in many other areas where the EU has competences as well, like industrial policy, employment, health
and social policy. This makes the case for an integrated EU cycling strategy that includes these fields and considers cycling in all relevant
policy areas and will therefore enable the whole EU to reap the benefits if cycling in the future.
5. The EU Cycling Economy 5
INTRODUCTION
1. Contribution to the EU cycling strategy and global perspectives
The present report clearly shows the benefits of the Active Mobility Agenda not only for further research, but also for well-structured
advocacy and agenda setting in policy. In particular for the European policy cycling appears not only in specific, isolated fields like
transport or environmental policy, but in many other areas where the EU has competences as well, like industrial policy, employment,
health and social policy. This makes the case, delivers targets and enables an integrated EU cycling strategy that includes these fields
and considers cycling in all relevant policy areas that will therefore enable the whole EU to reap these benefits in the future. Practically
this means also a lot of cost savings in several fields of public investments like for health, environment, climate and social-educational
fields, or – in other words – a transfer from transport whenever delivered through active mobility to other budget topics.
Thus, the approach based on the Active Mobility Agenda enables to unleash these enormous potentials for a long-term sustainable
development policy in all countries in Europe. Furthermore, using the same methodological approach we have already identified the
contributions of cycling to the UN Sustainable Development Goals1
, where cycling is contributing significantly to 12 of the 17 SDGs.
Highlighted already to the UN Climate Summit COP 21 in Paris2
, this becomes now an invitation to researchers all over the world to
contribute interdisciplinarily.3
The present report marks a step forward for the EU Cycling Strategy to develop and create the European role model for integrated
transport and an overall sustainable policy. The ‘Blueprint for an EU Cycling Strategy’4
will be presented at the Velo-city conference
Arnhem-Nijmegen. This report also can be seen as a small contribution to overcome the limiting, negatively connoted term NMT (non
motorized transport) and to unleash the full potential of Active Mobility.
2. Context: The active mobility agenda as an evaluation matrix
The systematic classification of the benefits of cycling in this report is based on the development of the active mobility agenda during
the last years.5,6
‘Active mobility (AM)’ as a concept already expresses the positive contribution of cycling to society. It has also helped
us to identify nine ‘key issues’ where the benefits of cycling become tangible. As shown in the matrix below, these key issues are based
on the three dimensions of sustainable development: the environment, the economy and social affairs. To this, we add boosting factors:
energy and resources, technology and design, and mobility. Finally, balancing factors are health, time and space, and the diversity of
cultures.
Furthermore in this context, the active mobility agenda is widening the frame. Active mobility is mainly walking and cycling, thus the
agenda can be applied in the future to evaluate the benefits of walking in a similar structured way as for cycling, and this gives an idea
of the real dimension of active mobility.
6. 6 The EU Cycling Economy
FIGURE 1: THE ACTIVE MOBILITY AGENDA
FIGURE 2: ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF CYCLING IN THE EU-28
BasicfactorsBoostingfactorsBalancingfactors
Environment
+ Climate
Economy Social Affairs
Energy + Resources Technology + Design Mobility
Health Time + Space Diversity of cultures
Calculations
based on concrete
evidence
Calculations based
on best available
data
Estimations based
on best available
indications
No data available
at present
Climate
Reduced CO2 emissions 2.2 bn €
Related benefits to reduced
CO2 emissions
10 bn € x
Environment
Reduced air pollution 0.43 bn €
Reduced noise pollution 0.3 bn €
Environmental asset
development
Less sealed soils 2 bn €
Less soil pollution 0.5 bn €
Better water quality €
Energy
Fuel savings 2.8 bn €
AM hybrid contributions to
E-mobility
€
Resources
Resource savings in vehicle
production + infrastructure
building
To produce a bike
requires only ca.
2% of the resources
for a car
€
Direct health benefits
Longer lives 97 bn €
Healthier lives 39 bn €
Improved mental health 30 bn € x
Improved kids health versus
sedentary life styles
20 bn € x
Road safety benefits /
reduced accidents
Reduced fatalities 0.38 bn €
Reduced serious injuries 0.33 bn €
Reduced light injuries 0.06 bn €
Health economic benefits Reduced absenteeism 4.5 bn €
• The calculations are based on a value of 134 bn kilometers cycled per year for the EU-28.
• The calculations are based on the latest available data, which can be from different years.
7. The EU Cycling Economy 7
x = lack of data for precise calculation € = general lack of data for quantification
EU bike industry
Value of EU bike
manufacturing
4.3 bn €
Value of EU parts/accessories
manufacturing
1.7 bn €
Bicycle and parts sales and
repairs
Value of bike sales 6.6 bn €
Value of parts/accessories
sales
2.3 bn €
Value of bicycle repair 0.99 bn €
Bicycle tourism
44 bn €
… from other businesses €
Road safety Reduced material damage 3.2 bn €
Urban design
Urban design-benefits of ITS in
urban planning+ infrastructure
10 bn €
Smarter Cycling
Contributions to new
technolog + smart cities
development
10 bn €
Quality of time spent cycling €
Shopping by bike 111 bn €
Additional benefits
for other key-issues!
Child welfare Time savings for parents €
Quality of space
Space savings bike : car
1:10 parking - 1:>5 moving
20 bn € €
Social Affairs
Social equality €
Gender equality 10 bn € x
Child welfare 30 bn € x
Social safety 10 bn € x
Mobility / transport Congestion-easing 6.6 bn €
Road infrastructure
Construction 1.9 bn €
Maintenance 1.1 bn €
Subsidies for public transport €
Inter- and multimodality 20 bn €
Transport taxes and tax
subsidies
x
Diversity of (cycling-) cultures
Resilience + robustness €
Cultural connectivity €
Accessibility 10 bn € x
TOTAL 513 239 90 182
EU BENEFITS OF CYCLING - SUMMARY
(BILLION EUROS)
CYCLING BENEFITS ARE HIGHER
THAN BELGIAN ANNUAL GDP
Environment + Climate: € 15,43 Economy: € 63,09 Social Affairs: € 50,00
Energy and Resources: € 2,80 Technology + Design: € 20,00 Mobility: € 29,60
Health: € 191,27 Time + Space: € 131,00 Diversity of cultures: € 10,00
Total:
€513.19 bn
EU benefits of cycling
(billion euros)
GDP of Belgium
(billion euros, 2015)
Total:
€513.19 bn
Total:
€410,35
8. 8 The EU Cycling Economy
DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITS
1. CO2
EMISSION SAVINGS
• The calculations are based on the ECF study "Cycle more Often
2 cool down the planet! Quantifying CO2 savings of cycling"
from 2011.
• km cycled: 134 231 025 984
• CO2 savings: 15,248,644,552 kg
• Cost of CO2 pollution: 160.5 $ per ton
• Average exchange rate $/€ in 2015: 1.109729
<http://www.usforex.com/forex-tools/historical-rate-tools/
yearly-average-rates>
• Cost in €: 144.63 € per ton
• Value of savings: 2.205.410.015 €
2. RELATED BENEFITS TO REDUCED CO2
EMISSIONS
• This includes benefits linked to avoided climate change dam-
ages that are caused by increased CO2 emissions, the so-called
“social cost of carbon”.7
• Additionally, cycling prevents the so-called “rebound effect”
identified from the use of electric cars.8
• Estimated value: 10,000,000,000 €
3. REDUCTION OF AIR POLLUTION
• Calculation methodology refined in comparison to 2013 paper,
taking a more conservative approach by only counting car kilo-
metres replaced; data sources updated
• Car km replaced: 42.953.928.314,88
• Diesel cars in fleet: 41%, petrol cars: 54%
<http://www.acea.be/statistics/tag/category/passenger-car-
fleet-by-fuel-type>
• Share of car fleet according to EURO emission standards:
<http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/alloca-
tion-of-passenger-cars-and-1>
• Cost of air pollution: <http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/
sustainable/studies/doc/2014-handbook-external-costs-trans-
port.pdf>
• Cost of reduced air pollution: 426,797,211 €
4. REDUCTION OF NOISE POLLUTION
• No substantial change in underlying data; same calculation
used as for 2013 paper:
- Using the values of the “Handbook on estimation of exter-
nal costs in the transport”
- The bicycle substitutes other modes of transport as follows:
bus (40%, average v bus occupancy of 10), car (30%), walk-
ing (20%), motor cycle (10%);
- 90% of distance travelled by bike would otherwise take
place during day time, 10% during night time;
- 50% of km cycled are urban km, 30% are suburban km and
20% rural km.
• Value of reduced noise pollution: 300,000,000 €
5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSET DEVELOPMENT
• Cycling infrastructure needs less space than infrastructure
for cars. If less infrastructure is needed, this leads to reduced
building costs and resource savings (See points II.2 and VIII.2),
but also to environmental benefits in the form of less sealed
soil by infrastructure.
- Estimated value: 2,000,000,000 €
• Also, if there is less car traffic, there will be less soil pollution
by car fuels and other pollutants.
- Estimated value: 500,000,000 €
• This will also lead to better water quality through less pollu-
tion of ground water.
I. Environment and climate
Total: €15.43 bn
9. The EU Cycling Economy 9
1. FUEL SAVINGS
• Calculation methodology updated since 2013 paper: direct
calculation based on fuel price and average fuel consumption
rather than indirect calculation based on CO2 emissions
• Fuel price per l: 1.32 € (end of 2014, average of diesel and
petrol; Eurostat)
• Average consumption: 5 l/100 km (real consumption probably
higher than standard lab values) (http://www.theicct.org/sites/
default/files/publications/ICCT_EU-pocketbook_2015.pdf)
• Fuel price per km: 0.066 €
• Fuel savings for 32% of car traffic replaced by cycling:
2,834,959,269 €
2. ACTIVE MOBILITY HYBRID
CONTRIBUTIONS TO E-MOBILITY
• E-bikes according to the EU EPAC regulations9
are the most
successful part of E-mobility.
• By combining active and passive mobility all the benefits of
cycling can be used. The very little energy input is tripling the
range in everyday cycling on an average.
• The further increase of cycling will be based significantly on
E-cycling, to be measured also according to the Active mobility
index.10
• Further research needed to calculate the exact value of the
benefit.
3. RESOURCE SAVINGS IN VEHICLE
PRODUCTION + INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDING
• Building bikes needs considerably less resources than building
cars. Some of the resources are the same, but used in much
less quantities (e.g. steel, aluminium, different polymers), oth-
ers, like platinum or palladium for catalytic converters which
cause significant emissions and environmental damage during
their extraction, are not used at all for the manufacturing of
bicycles. We can estimate that building a bike needs only ca.
2% of the resources that are needed for building a car.
• The same holds true for the building of cycling infrastructure,
which needs much less concrete and asphalt than infrastruc-
ture for cars (see point VIII.2).
• Further research needed to calculate the exact value of the
benefit.
1. LONGER LIVES - REDUCED MORTALITY
• Calculation from 2013 paper updated: Recent values from
WHO database used for value of statistical live (EU-28 average:
3,465,694 €) and mortality rate (WHO European Region
average, no EU average available: 414.49 deaths per 100,000
persons per year)
• Cycled kilometres per year: 264 km (reference: Austria)
• Persons in age group 20-64: 306 079 787
• Kilometres cycled: 80 805 063 768
• Monetary benefits (mortality): 96,554,944,000 €
• The number of deaths per year that are prevented by this level
of cycling is: 27,860
• Calculation based on the World Health Organisation’s Health
Economic Assessment Tool for Walking and Cycling (HEAT),
which is available online.11
2. HEALTHIER LIVES - REDUCED MORBIDITY
Morbidity benefits: 40% of mortality benefits <http://www.
gracq.org/sites/default/files/2014rbceconomievelo.pdf>:
38,621,977,600 €
3. MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS
• There is abundant evidence showing that cycling can improve
the functioning of the brain and mental health:12
- A Dutch study showed that regular cycling improved white
matter integrity and thus brain connectivity both in healthy
persons and patients with schizophrenia.13
- A meta-study showed that regular physical exercise like
cycling increased concentrations of peripheral brain-derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein supporting healthy
brain function and helping to avoid diseases like Parkinson’s
or Alzheimer’s.14
- Physical exercise also helps to counter cognitive declines
including memory, executive function, visuospatial skills,
and processing speed in normally aging adults.15
- In patients with depression, physical exercise helped both
to decrease levels of the stress hormone cortisol and to
improve subjective depressive symptoms.16
• Mental health always is embedded into a healthy body, so to
consider the two of them together is important.,Active mobil-
ity and cycling in particular are today widelyrecognised as an
excellent exercise to improve both.17
• E-cycling adds a new aspect to the discussion on health benefits
of cycling. It is increasingly a psychological issue with regard to
its motivation, technic-attracting and trend-setting aspects that
attract new groups that might not have cycled previously, but
also here the health benefits overall are substantial.18
• Estimated value: 30,000,000,000 €
II. Energy and resources
Total: €2.8 bn
III. Health benefits
Total: €191.27 bn
10. 10 The EU Cycling Economy
4. HEALTH BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN
• Cycling to school and for recreation at a young age – helps to
reap the life-long benefits of cycling.19
• Cycling brings health and social benefits for families, as it’s
good to start cycling at a young age, to improve fitness,
positive mental attitudes, stress resilience, habits in socialising
and social education, with positive outcomes for the whole
family.20
• The benefits of Active Mobility can be best triggered by using
the natural inclination to run and exercise that existsg in early
childhood, and further on these habits can be used as a driver
of change, as we know from similar examples in other fields.21
• Research also points to the benefits of earlier behaviour
change for health welfare.22
• All these good reasons together made a strong case for the
ECF to initiate the “Charter of Vancouver” with a focus on
children and cycling in 2012.23
• The relatively small investments into giving children a “play-
ground” in public space are one of the most valuable matters
for sustainable development,24
but have already now an
estimated value of: 20,000,000,000 €
5. ROAD SAFETY BENEFITS AVOIDED CAR ACCIDENTS
• Based on: https://nationaler-radverkehrsplan.de/de/aktuell/
nachrichten/veroeffentlichung-der-forschungsergebnisse-des
• Adjusted for 2015 prices
• Fatality statistics: ETSC 10th Annual Road Safety Performance
Index (PIN) Report http://etsc.eu/10th-annual-road-safety-per-
formance-index-pin-report/
• Injury estimations: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safe-
ty/specialist/statistics/index_en.htm ("For every death on
Europe's roads there are an estimated 4 permanently disabling
injuries such as damage to the brain or spinal cord, 8 serious
injuries and 50 minor injuries.")
Cost per unit Total cost
Car crash fatalities
avoided:
268 1,417,267 € 379,364,254 €
Serious injuries
avoided:
3,212 103,342 € 331,943,722 €
Light injuries
avoided:
13,384 4.606 € 61,646,691 €
772,954,667 €
6. REDUCED ABSENTEEISM FROM WORK
HEALTH BENEFITS FOR BUSINESSES
• Average hourly labour cost in EU 28 2015: 25 € per hour (Eu-
rostat)
• Average cost per day (8 hours): 200 € per day
• Employees cycling to work are on average 1.3 days less absent
due to sickness than those who do not cycle to work. The gain
per employee is thus 260 € per year (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/pubmed/20580736)
• Active population: 238,991,000 (Eurostat)
• Employed population: 216,525,846 (Eurostat)
• Cycling to work (assumption: 8%, based on Eurobarometer
"Quality of transport", 2014): 17.322.067,68
• Gain of reduced absenteeism: 4,503,737,597 €
Longer lives: € 97,00
Improved kids health versus
sedentary life styles: € 20,00
Healthier lives: € 39,00
Reduced fatalities: € 0,38
Reduced light injuries: € 0,06
Improved mental health: € 30,00
Reduced serious injuries: € 0,33
Reduced absenteeism: € 4,50
HEALTH BENEFITS OF CYCLING
(BILLION EUROS)
Total:
€191.27 bn
11. The EU Cycling Economy 11
1. BICYCLE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
• Production of parts and accessories: 1,687,000,000 €
• Bikes produced in EU: 13,149,000
• Value of bikes produced in EU: 4,277,369,700 €
2. SALES AND REPAIRS
• Turnover of Bike Sales 2015: 6,582,195,777 €
• Retail accessories and equipment (35% of bike sales):
2,303,768,522 €
• Bicycle repair (15% of bike sales): 987,329,367 €
3. BICYCLE TOURISM
• Value of bicycle tourism: 44,000,000,000 € per year
• Based on 2.3 billion cycle tourism trips per year in Europe
• Study commissioned by the Committee for Transport and Tour-
ism of the European Parliament (2012): http://www.europarl.
europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2012/474569/IP-
OL-TRAN_ET(2012)474569_EN.pdf
4. BICYCLE TOURISM ECONOMIC BENEFITS
IN OTHER BUSINESSES
• Value of bicycle tourism in other sectors, like travel agencies
not specialised on cycle tourism
• Clear indicators for additional benefits from specific target
groups like e.g. “silver cyclists”
5. MATERIAL DAMAGE AVOIDED
FROM CAR ACCIDENTS
• Based on: https://nationaler-radverkehrsplan.de/de/aktuell/
nachrichten/veroeffentlichung-der-forschungsergebnisse-des
• Material damage avoided: 3,246,783,291 €
1. URBAN DESIGN – BENEFITS OF INTEGRATED
URBAN PLANNING AND INFRASTRUCTURE
• Giving more space in cities to active modes of transport like
walking and cycling and less to individual motorised transport
will improve urban design as a whole, by making cities more
accessible for everyone, connecting neighbourhoods and
creating meeting places. This in turn leads to multiple other
benefits, e.g. better social cohesion (see point VII.1) or more
revenues for shop owners (see point VI.1).
• The investments of public authorities in these sectors are tremen-
dous. Most of the money spent is from already existing sectors.
For cycling we know about the fast RoI (return on investments)
• It has leveraging effects for many other businesses, and has
to be taken into account with an estimated amount of at least
10,000,000,000 € per year.
2. SMARTER CYCLING CONTRIBUTION OF CYCLING TO
NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND SMART CITY DEVELOPMENT
• Some of the bikes produced today are high-tech products.
New, light-weight materials are developed and tested for bikes
(e.g. carbon fibres) that can be used in other areas as well. This
is especially true for electric bikes and their innovative com-
ponents like batteries and new power trains, which have made
electro mobility a reality in the EU. Today, many more electric
bikes than electric cars are sold in Europe.
• Cycling is also becoming more and more connected, using
ICT for applications like route planning, public bike systems
or GPS tracking. With these new services, cycling becomes an
integral part of the transport systems of future smart cities.
• We are at the very beginning to open channel access for the
bike industry to a multi-bn business of the $ 19 Trillion “Inter-
net of Things” (IoT) market (per CISCO).25
• Cycling as a trigger at the center of smart mobility is
gaining speed, and on a current first level estimated by
10,000,000,000 € per year.
IV. Microeconomic benefits
Total: €63.09 bn
V. Technology and Design
Total: €20 bn
Urban design-benefits of ITS in urban
planning + infrastructure: € 10
Contributions to new technology
+ smart cities development: € 10
TECHNOLOGY + DESIGN BENEFITS
(BILLION EUROS)
Total:
€20 bn
12. 12 The EU Cycling Economy
1. SOCIAL EQUALITY
By providing a cheap transport option, cycling can help to make
jobs and participation in social life better accessible to disad-
vantaged population groups. Improving cycling conditions can
therefore improve social equality.28
2. GENDER EQUALITY
Historically, cycling has helped women to move more inde-
pendently and furthered their emancipation. Research shows
that also in modern Europe, women tend to benefit more from
higher cycling levels. For example, since they are still taking care
of most of childrens’ and older adults’ mobility in families, they
gain more free time if the children and elderly can undertake
journeys by bike independently and do not need a lift by car.29
3. CHILD WELFARE
• The overall benefits for children are tremendous, therefore we
launched the “ECF Charter of Vancouver” in 2012 (see point
III.4).30
• E.g. children that start to cycle at an early age can derive
benefits in terms of developing their motor and balance skills
as well as gaining independence earlier by being able to move
around without having to be given a ride by their parents. This
has positive effects for the kids, the parents and in particular
for our increasingly sedentary societies.
• There is evidence on various dimensions for better learning
and social competence.
4. SOCIAL SAFETY
Coming from the “Safety in numbers”31
effect, the more people
cycle the safer traffic will become for all in a street. In a similar
way, more people cycling and walking in streets increases social
control, which can help to deter criminals and create a higher
level of perceived safety. Even the social benefits therefore are
significant.
VII. Social Affairs
Total: €50 bn
VI. Time and Space
Total: €131 bn
1. QUALITY OF TIME SPENT CYCLING
Linked to the physical and mental health benefits (see point III),
studies show that cyclists are among the most satisfied transport
users, indicating that they derive a higher utility of the time
spent cycling than for example car drivers since the trip has
value other than arriving at a destination.26
Further research needed to calculate the exact value of the
benefit.
2. SHOPPING BY BIKE
• Total amount calculated: 111,000,000,000 € per year
• See ECF Publication: “Shopping by bike: Best friend of your
city centre”.27
• Additional benefits for other key-issues
3. CHILD WELFARE – TIME SAVINGS FOR PARENTS
As mentioned under point VII.2, cycling for children frees up
time for their parents who do not have to give them a lift to
school or extracurricular activities anymore.Further research
needed to calculate the exact value of the benefit.
4. QUALITY OF PUBLIC SPACE
• Public space can be rare and expensive. Compared with cars
the relationship of the bicycle is excellent: just about 10%
space use when parked, but less then 5% when moved.
• These benefits are even higher taking into account that bicy-
cles are not garbaging complete streets on a long-term, and
the quality of stay in bicycle streets is always higher.
• Estimated amount of benefits: 20,000,000,000 €
13. The EU Cycling Economy 13
1. CONGESTION EASING
• Based on cycled kilometres: 134,231,025,984
• Price for congestion (€/km): 0,153030172 (based on UK
WebTAG)
• Share of cycling km replacing car trips: 32%
• Result: 6,573,247,024 €
2. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
OF ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
• Data on road infrastructure investment and maintenance
costs: https://data.oecd.org/transport/infrastructure-invest-
ment.htm
• Data on car kilometres: ETSC 10th Annual Road Safety
Performance Index (PIN) Report http://etsc.eu/10th-annu-
al-road-safety-performance-index-pin-report/
• Road infrastructure investment costs avoided by cycling:
1,894,639,499 €
• Road maintenance investment costs avoided by cycling:
1,114,457,693 €
3. PUBLIC TRANSPORT SUBSIDIES
• Besides car trips, cycling also replaces public transport trips.
By taking pressure of public transport systems especially in
the peak hours, when costs are the highest, cycling can help to
decrease subsidies for public transport.
• If Public Bike Schemes are part of public transport, this helps
also to take pressure of the rest of the system.
4. CONNECTIVITY – INTER- AND MULTIMODALITY
Cycling helps in an excellent way to fulfil connectivity for inter-
and multimodality solutions with several other modes of trans-
port. It improves capacity building with public transport, several
ride+travel solutions etc.
5. TRANSPORT TAXES AND TAX SUBSIDIES
The impact of cycling on tax revenues goes in two directions.
First, there is foregone revenue from fuel taxes through less fuel
consumption (see point II.1); however, depending on the tax
system, there can also be a positive impact through higher tax
incomes because less people choose company cars as a salary
replacement that is taxed at advantageous rates, profiting effec-
tively from a tax subsidy.32
1. RESILIENCE AND ROBUSTNESS
• Cycling makes cultures more resilient by providing transport
options also in cases of emergency like natural catastrophes or
terrorist attacks.
• No matter the culture or level of economic development,
cycling is a robust mode of transport that can be used in a
sustainable way. Even in highly advanced economies, this is a
precondition of bringing people together (see also the social
benefits in pt. VII).
2. CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN PEOPLE
• Cycling is a social activity. By bringing people together and
connecting neighbourhoods, it provides the potential for im-
proved social interactions and more exchange between them.
It can connect people from different backgrounds and social
classes, thus improving the cohesion of society (see also point
VII.1).
• It is also always a matter of cultural integration in the diversity
of cultures.
3. ACCESSIBILITY
Cycling increases accessibility, not only to employment (see
point VII.1), but to also to places of social and cultural exchange.
VIII. Mobility
Total: €29.60 bn
IX. Bringing people together
Diversity of cycling cultures
Total: €10 bn
14. 14 The EU Cycling Economy
CONCLUSIONS
1. Background
This report is ECF’s second calculation of the internal and exter-
nal benefits of cycling linked to the current level of cycling in the
EU-28. It is an extended and updated version of the first report
published in 2013.33
The calculations have been updated with the
latest available figures; in some cases, the methodologies for
calculating the benefits have been refined taking into account
the feedback received; and more benefits have been added in a
systematic way, following the development of the active mobility
agenda during the last years. Taking this systematic approach,
which we have already followed to identify the contributions of
cycling to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals,34
we see that cycling has positive impacts in many more fields
than previously considered.
According to an EU-wide survey, 8 % of Europeans used the bike
as their preferred mode of transport on a typical day in 2014.35
Statistical data on the average yearly cycling distance is not
available for all EU countries; based on the statistics we have
available, we assume a total of 134 bn km cycled per year.36
The
calculations on the economic benefits of cycling have been based
on this value.
The main challenge that arose after having identified the fields
where cycling can potentially bring about economic benefits was
the lack of data to make concrete calculations about the extent
of these benefits. We have therefore chosen to create four cate-
gories of benefits according to the availability of data:
• Calculations based on concrete evidence: Here, enough
data and reference values are available to quantify the
effects of cycling through a calculation.
• Calculations based on best available data: There is some
data available, but estimates had to be used as well in
order to make a calculation.
• Estimations based on best available indications: Research
has been done on this subject, but there is not enough
quantitative data available yet to make a concrete calcu-
lation. Estimations are based on the qualitative research
available. They represent the order of magnitude of the
described benefits rather than actual calculations. More
data and research is needed to make these numbers more
precise.
• No data available at present: More qualitative and quan-
titative research is needed in this field to identify the
benefits of cycling.
The aim of this report is therefore also to encourage further re-
search on the subject in order to draw a more precise picture of
the economic benefits of cycling in the future. The list of benefits
of cycling in this report is not extensive, and there are other
qualitative benefits that can be taken into account in future
research.
2. Discussion of results
The results of our calculations and estimations show that the
value of cycling for society, the environment and the economy
is clearly much higher than previously estimated, and covers a
lot more fields than those considered traditionally. This is in line
with continuous efforts in research to frame cycling as a form of
active mobility whose multiple benefits are fully acknowledged,
establishing a third pillar of transport policy next to public trans-
port and individual motorised transport.37
The calculations in this report present the gross benefits of
cycling. A next step would be to include also the costs of cycling
into the calculation. For example, in the field of road safety, only
the benefits of less car accidents are taken into account, not
the costs of cycling accidents. However, research shows that as
more people cycle, cycling becomes relatively safer, and thus the
related accident costs would decrease as well.
3. Need for further research
Where calculations were made, they were based on the data avail-
able today. However, the data base on cycling is still rather scarce,
including basic statistics like modal split or kilometres cycled per
inhabitants per year. The calculations could be made much more
precise if these data were available at the same level as for other
modes of transport. Local, regional, national and European author-
ities should strive to collect these data and to develop methods
to harmonise available statistics so that they can be compared
between cities and regions as well as across borders.
In several areas, especially but not only concerning the social
and cultural benefits of cycling, more research will also be need-
ed on the quantification of these benefits in order to express
their magnitude in monetary terms. The European Union could
make a big contribution in this field by taking this type of re-
search more into account in their research funding programmes
like Horizon 2020.
Furthermore in this context, this report explains how the
active mobility agenda works and widens the frame for further
research. Active mobility is mainly walking and cycling, thus the
agenda can be applied to evaluate the benefits of walking in a
similar structured way as for cycling. For systematic analysis and
advocacy, we already developed this agenda therefore as kind of
an open source.38
For researchers this means enlarged fields for
research, and in this report we refer to the increasing demand
in these fields related to the agenda. For decision makers in
politics it delivers parameters for sustainable development and
transport research policy:
• Public tenders for research can be structured transparent-
ly to demand;
• Existing tenders can now acknowledge cycling in a fair way;
• Investments in cycling modes, from planning and budgeting
until concrete, can be realised in adequate sustainable ways.
15. The EU Cycling Economy 15
www.ecf.com
1
Neun, M. 2016. S4C and COP 21 – challenges, achievements and perspectives
for the evolution of cycling. Key-note presentation at the Scientists-for-Cycling
colloquium at Velo-city 2016 Taipei, 26.02.2016. Extended abstract available at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByMLurB9op4KeFpjWlZ4UzM1cGktZDNNeXBiRF
ZDS0ktdXhJ/view [accessed: 15.10.2016].
2
ECF 2015. Cycling Delivers on the Global Goals. At: https://ecf.com/what-we-do/
global-cycling-policies/voluntary-commitment-un [accessed: 15.10.2016].
3
At the Scietists-for-Cycling colloquium in Aveiro, Nov 24-25, 2016. https://
scientistsforcyclingaveiro2016.wordpress.com/program/
4
Bodor, A. 2016. The EU Cycling Strategy: Developing a blueprint for an EU Cycling
Strategy. At: https://ecf.com/groups/scientists-cycling/eu-cycling-strategy-
developing-blueprint-eu-cycling-strategy [accessed: 15.10.2016].
5
Neun, M. 2015. Preface, in: Gerike, R. and Parkin, J. 2015 (Eds.). Cycling Futures
– From Research into Practice. Ashgate, Surrey (UK) and Burlington (US), p. xxiii-
xxxiii.
6
Held, M., Schindler, J. and Litmann, T. 2015. Cycling and Active Mobility –
Establishing a Third Pillar of Transport Policy, in: Gerike, R. and Parkin, J. 2015
(Eds.). Cycling Futures – … see above.
7
EPA Factsheet 2015: The Social Cost of Carbon, https://www3.epa.gov/
climatechange/Downloads/EPAactivities/social-cost-carbon.pdf
8
See e.g.: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2011/feb/22/rebound-
effect-climate-change
9
EUR-Lex 2013. Directive 2002/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 18 March 2002 relating to the type-approval of two or three-
wheel motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 92/61/EEC (Text
with EEA relevance); Official Journal L 124 , 09/05/2002 P. 0001 - 0044.
Retrieved 21 March 2013. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.
do?uri=CELEX:32002L0024:EN:HTML
10
Held, M., Neun M. and Schindler, J. 2012. Mobility-Energy-Index (MEI) – a new tool
to promote cycling. Presentation Velo-city Global 2012, June 26-29, Vancouver BC.
11
http://www.heatwalkingcycling.org/
12
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/minding-the-body/201505/bicycling-
can-sharpen-your-thinking-and-improve-your-mood
13
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829377
14
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23600729
15
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00075/full
16
http://bpsmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1751-0759-7-18
17
Garrard, J., Handy, S. and Dill, J. 2012. Women and Cycling. In J. Pucher and R.
Buehler (eds.), City Cycling, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 211-234.
18
De Geus, B. and Hendriksen, I. 2015. Cycling for Transport, Physical Activity and
Health: What about Pedelecs? In: Gerike, R. and Parkin, J. 2015 (Eds.). Cycling
Futures – From Research into Practice. Ashgate, Surrey (UK) and Burlington (US).
19
Sustrans 2016. The benefits of cycling for children and families. Overview
available at: http://www.sustrans.org.uk/what-you-can-do/children-and-families/
cycling-kids/benefits-family-cycling [accessed 2.11.2016].
20
Tranter PJ, 2015, 'Children’s Play in their Local Neighborhoods: Rediscovering
the Value of Residential Streets', in Evans B; Horton J (ed.), Play, Recreation,
Health and Well Being, Geographies of Children and Young People 9, Springer,
Singapore.
21
Manzini, E. and Tassinari, V. 2013. Sustainable Qualities – Powerful drivers
of social change. In: Crocker R. and Lehmann, S. 2013. Motivating Change –
Sustainable Design and Behaviour in the Built Environment. Routledge, Abington
and New York.
22
Tapp, A. and Parkin, J. 2015. The Use of Social Marketing in Promoting Cycling,
in: Gerike, R. and Parkin, J. 2015 (Eds.). Cycling Futures – From Research into
Practice. Ashgate, Surrey (UK) and Burlington (US).
23
ECF 2012. “The Charter of Vancouver on CHILDREN AND CYCLING”, signed at
Velo-city Global Vancouver 2012, June 29th. Available at: http://www.ecf.com/
about-us/manifesto/children-have-the-right-to-cycle/ [accessed: 12th September
2014].
24
Tranter PJ; Sharpe S, 2015, 'Global Energy Stress: Challenges and Opportunities
for Child-Friendly Cities', in Ansell N; Klocker N; Skelton T (ed.), Geographies of
Global Issues: Change and Threat, Geographies of Children and Young People 8,,
Springer, Singapore.
25
CISCO Consulting Services 2014. The Internet of Everything – A $19 Trillion
Opportunity. Available at: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/services/portfolio/
consulting-services/documents/consulting-services-capturing-ioe-value-aag.pdf
26
http://tram.mcgill.ca/Research/Publications/Happy_Commuter.pdf
27
https://ecf.com/sites/ecf.com/files/CYCLE%20N%20LOCAL%20ECONOMIES_
internet.pdf
28
http://b.3cdn.net/bikes/60e4ef1291e083cada_8ym6ip7pw.pdf
29
Garrard, J., Handy, S. and J. Dill: Women and Cycling. In: Pucher, J. and R. Buehler:
City Cycling. MIT Press, 2012, p. 211-234
30
ECF 2012. “The Charter of Vancouver on CHILDREN AND CYCLING”, signed at
Velo-city Global Vancouver 2012, June 29th. Available at: http://www.ecf.com/
about-us/manifesto/children-have-the-right-to-cycle/ [accessed: 12th September
2014].
31
ECF 2011. Halving injury and fatality rates for cyclists by 2020 – The ECF Road
Safety Charter. Available at: http://www.ecf.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/
ECF_Road_safety_charter.pdf [accessed: 12th September 2015].
32
Haubold, H. 2014. Commuting: Who Pays the Bill? Overview of fiscal regimes for
commuting in Europe and recommendations for establishing a level playing-field.
European Cyclists’ Federation, Brussels, 2014. Available at: https://ecf.com/sites/
ecf.com/files/141117-Commuting-Who-Pays-The-Bill_2.pdf
33
Küster, F. and Blondel, B. (2013). Calculating the economic benefits of cycling
in EU 27. Economic report of the European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF), Brussels,
June 24, 2013. available at: http://www.ecf.com/sites/ecf.com/files/Fabians%20
ECF_Economic-benefits-of-cycling-in-EU-27-3.pdf [accessed: 12th October 2016].
34
ECF, 2015: Cycling delivers on the global goals. At: https://ecf.com/what-we-do/
global-cycling-policies/voluntary-commitment-un [accessed: 15.10.2016].
35
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_422a_en.pdf , fieldwork
October 2014.
36
Based on an average cycling distance of 264 km per year per inhabitant (https://
www.bmvit.gv.at/service/publikationen/verkehr/fuss_radverkehr/downloads/
riz201503.pdf). This corresponds to the cycled distance per inhabitant in Austria,
the country which is closest to the European average in the Eurobarometer
survey on quality of transport.
37
Held, M., Schindler, J. and Litmann, T. 2015. Cycling and Active Mobility –
Establishing a Third Pillar of Transport Policy, in: Gerike, R. and Parkin, J. 2015
(Eds.). Cycling Futures – … see above.
38
Neun, M. 2015. Why Walking is my Favourite mode – the Case for an Active
Mobility Alliance. The Walk 21 Vienna conference magazine, October 20.-23.2015,
p. 62. Available in print and at: https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/
studien/pdf/b008449.pdf [accessed: 15.10.2016].
REFERENCES
16.
www.ecf.com
ECF gratefully acknowledges
financial support from the
European Commission Rue Franklin, 28 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 2 880 92 74 Fax: +32 2 880 92 75 office@ecf.com