Tiara Ramadhani - Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi - Fakultas Sains dan Tekn...Tiara Ramadhani
Tugas ini di buat untuk memenuhi salah satu tugas mata kuliah pada Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi.
Oleh ;
Nama : Tiara Ramadhani.
NIM ; 11453201723
SIF VII E
UIN SUSKA RIAU
Tiara Ramadhani - Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi - Fakultas Sains dan Tekn...Tiara Ramadhani
Tugas ini di buat untuk memenuhi salah satu tugas mata kuliah pada Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi.
Oleh ;
Nama : Tiara Ramadhani.
NIM ; 11453201723
SIF VII E
UIN SUSKA RIAU
Hello~ this is my slide describe about Software Development Models.
Created by: Meychia Hanifah Gaiza - Department of Information System - UIN Suska Riau
Bab ini membahas model pengembangan perangkat lunak yang paling umum diterapkan, tingkat uji dan jenis uji. Pemeliharaan dapat dilihat sebagai contoh spesifik dari suatu proses pembangunan.
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycleelvira munanda
Testing is not a stand-alone activity. It has its place within a software development life cycle model and therefore the life cycle applied will largely determine how testing is organized
Software Development Models - Graham et al Foundation of Software Testing
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Software Development Models by Graham et alEmi Rahmi
Software Development Models - Graham et al Foundation of Software Testing
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Testing throughout the software life cycleyahdi sandra
YAHDI SANDRA
1143104752
Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi
Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Testing is not a stand-alone activity. It has its place within a software development life cycle model and therefore the life cycle applied will largely determine how testing is organized.
A detailed-look-at-v-model-in-software-testingpooja deshmukh
V-model in software testing means Verification and Validation model. Much the same as the waterfall model, the V-Shaped life cycle is a consecutive path of execution of procedures. Every stage must be completed before the following stage starts. Testing of the product is arranged in parallel with a parallel stage of development in V-model.
Hello~ this is my slide describe about Software Development Models.
Created by: Meychia Hanifah Gaiza - Department of Information System - UIN Suska Riau
Bab ini membahas model pengembangan perangkat lunak yang paling umum diterapkan, tingkat uji dan jenis uji. Pemeliharaan dapat dilihat sebagai contoh spesifik dari suatu proses pembangunan.
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycleelvira munanda
Testing is not a stand-alone activity. It has its place within a software development life cycle model and therefore the life cycle applied will largely determine how testing is organized
Software Development Models - Graham et al Foundation of Software Testing
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Software Development Models by Graham et alEmi Rahmi
Software Development Models - Graham et al Foundation of Software Testing
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Testing throughout the software life cycleyahdi sandra
YAHDI SANDRA
1143104752
Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi
Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Testing is not a stand-alone activity. It has its place within a software development life cycle model and therefore the life cycle applied will largely determine how testing is organized.
A detailed-look-at-v-model-in-software-testingpooja deshmukh
V-model in software testing means Verification and Validation model. Much the same as the waterfall model, the V-Shaped life cycle is a consecutive path of execution of procedures. Every stage must be completed before the following stage starts. Testing of the product is arranged in parallel with a parallel stage of development in V-model.
Comparing Various SDLC Models On The Basis Of Available MethodologyIJMER
There are various SDLC models widely accepted and employed for developing software.
SDLC models give a theoretical guide line regarding development of the software. Employing proper
SDLC allows the managers to regulate whole development strategy of the software. Each SDLC has its
advantages and disadvantages making it suitable for use under specific condition and constraints for
specified type of software only. We need to understand which SDLC would generate most successful
result when employed for software development. For this we need some method to compare SDLC
models. Various methods have been suggested which allows comparing SDLC models. Comparing SLDC
models is a complex task as there is no mathematical theorem or physical device available. The essence
of this paper is to analyse some methodologies that could result in successful comparison of the SDLC
models. For this we have studied various available tools, techniques and methodologies and have tried
to extract most simple, easy and highly understandable method for comparing SDLC models.
This is about software engineering.Software engineers apply engineering principles and knowledge of programming languages to build software solutions for end users. Software engineers design and develop computer games, business applications, operating systems, network control systems, and middleware—to name just a few of the many career paths available.
Software Development Models - Testing and Implementation System - Apridila An...Apridila Anggita Suri
Apridila Anggita Suri (NIM.11453205120)
Information System Departement
Science and Technology Faculty
State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Evolution of software; Characteristics of software; Software applications; Components of software; Software myths; Software problems; Software reuse; Overview of risk management; Process visibility; Professional responsibility.
testing throughout the software life cycleRiat Rayendra
testing throughout the software life cycle
RiatRayendra
11453101916
Information System
Faculty Sains and Technology
UIN Suska Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
Materi Testing dan Implementasi System
1. Testing Throughout The Software Life
Cycle:
Software Development Models
By:
Devinta Sari
Departement of Information System
Faculty of Science and Technology
State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim of Riau
Blog:devintasari8.blogspot.com Email:devinta8sari@gmail.com ig:@devintasari8
2. Software Development Models
The life cycle model that is adopted for a project
will have a big impact on the testing that is carried out.
Testing does not exist in isolation; test activities are
highly related to software development activities. It will
define the what, where, and when of our planned testing,
influence regression testing, and largely determine which
test techniques to use.
3. 1. V-model
Before discussing the V-
model, we will look at the model
which came before it. The
waterfall model was one of the
earliest models to be designed. It
has a natural timeline where tasks
are executed in a sequential
fashion. We start at the top of the
waterfall with a feasibility study
and flow down through the various
project tasks finishing with
implementation into the live
environment. Design flows
through into development, which
in turn flows into build, and finally
on into test.
4. Continue…
Although variants of the V-model exist, a common type of
V-model uses four test levels. The four test levels used, each with
their own objectives, are:
1. Component testing: searches for defects in and verifies
the functioning of software components (e.g. modules,
programs, objects, classes etc.) that are separately
testable.
2. Integration testing: tests interfaces between components,
interactions to dif ferent parts of a system such as an
operating system, file system and hard ware or interfaces
between systems.
5. Continue…
3. System testing: concerned with the behavior of the
whole system/product as defined by the scope of a
development project or product. The main focus of
system testing is verification against specified
requirements.
4. Acceptance testing: validation testing with respect to
user needs, require ments, and business processes
conducted to determine whether or not to accept the
system.
6. Continue…
Note that the types of work
products mentioned in Figure
2.2 on the left side of the V-
model are just an illustration.
In practice they come under
many different names.
References for generic work
products include the
Capability Maturity Model
Integration (CMMi) or the
'Software life cycle
processes' from ISO/IEC
12207.
7. 2. Iterative life cycles
Not all life cycles are sequential. There are also iterative
or incremental life cycles where, instead of one large
development time line from beginning to end, we cycle through a
number of smaller self-contained life cycle phases for the same
project. As with the V-model, there are many variants of iterative
life-cycles.
8. Continue…
A common feature of iterative approaches is that the
delivery is divided into increments or builds with each increment
adding new functionality. The initial increment will contain the
infrastructure required to support the initial build functionality. The
increment produced by an iteration may be tested at several levels
as part of its development. Subsequent increments will need testing
for the new functionality, regression testing of the existing
functionality, and integration testing of both new and existing parts.
Regression testing is increasingly important on all iterations after
the first one. This means that more testing will be required at each
subsequent delivery phase which must be allowed for in the project
plans.
Examples of iterative or incremental development models
are prototyping, Rapid Application Development (RAD), Rational
Unified Process (RUP) and agile development.
9. Rapid Application Development
Rapid Application Development (RAD) is formally a
parallel development of functions and subsequent integration.
10. Continue…
The RAD development process encourages active
customer feedback. The customer gets early visibility of the
product, can provide feedback on the design and can decide,
based on the existing functionality, whether to proceed with the
development, what functionality to include in the next delivery
cycle or even to halt the project if it is not delivering the expected
value. An early business-focused solution in the market place
gives an early return on investment (ROI) and can provide
valuable marketing information for the business. Validation with
the RAD development process is thus an early and major activity.
11. Agile development
Extreme Programming (XP) is currently one of the most well-
known agile development life cycle models. (See [Agile] for ideas behind this
approach.) The methodology claims to be more human friendly than traditional
development methods. Some characteristics of XP are:
a. It promotes the generation of business stories to define the functionality.
b. It demands an on-site customer for continual feedback and to define and
carry out functional acceptance testing .
c. It promotes pair programming and shared code ownership amongst the
developers.
d. It states that component test scripts shall be written before the code is
written and that those tests should be automated.
e. It states that integration and testing of the code shall happen several times
day.
f. It states that we always implement the simplest solution to meet today's
problems.
12. 3. Testing within a life cycle model
In summary, whichever life cycle model is being used,
there are several charac-teristics of good testing:
a. for every development activity there is a corresponding
testing activity.
b. each test level has test objectives specific to that level.
c. the analysis and design of tests for a given test level should
begin during the corresponding development activity.
d. testers should be involved in reviewing documents as soon as
drafts are avail able in the development cycle.