SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Download to read offline
Available in test levels 13 through 18 in Reading, Language Arts, and Mathematics, the
TerraNova™ Common Core tests are a set of TerraNova Multiple Assessments that measure the
Common Core State Standards. These test forms share the same selective-response items with
the TerraNova, Third Edition (TerraNova 3) Survey tests of the same test level and content area.
The additional items, including constructed-response items and various innovative item types
such as performance tasks, were specifically developed to measure the Common Core State
Standards. Items in these tests are aligned to both the TerraNova test content standards as
well as the Common Core State Standards. Such dual alignment allows the objective (standard)
level scores to be reported under both standard frameworks. The TerraNova Common Core
tests, with 2011 national norms, can provide teachers, schools, and districts early diagnostic
insight of student performance according to the Common Core State Standards provide
a smooth transition to these standards.
Content Structure
Items in the TerraNova Common Core tests are aligned to both the TerraNova content
standards and the Common Core State Standards. The differences and overlaps between the
TerraNova content standards framework and the Common Core State Standards framework
vary by test level and content area. As an example, Table 1 shows the
objectives measured under each content framework in the TerraNova
Common Core Form 1 level 15 Mathematics , level 16 Reading, and level
16 Language Arts tests.
Objective level scores—Objective Performance Index (OPI) and mastery
level (Low, Moderate, High) for each objective—are reported to provide
student performance information on the objectives that have sufficient
numbers of items associated. The TerraNova objective level scores are
reported when there are at least 4 items measuring the objective. The
Common Core objective level scores are reported when there are at least
3 items measuring the objective.
TerraNova Common Core
TerraNova Multiple Assessments: Measuring the Common Core State Standards
The TerraNova Common Core
tests, with 2011 national
norms, can provide teachers,
schools, and districts early
diagnostic insight of student
performance according to the
Common Core State Standards
provide a smooth transition to
these standards.
TerraNova Common Core
Score Reporting
The TerraNova Common Core tests are on the TerraNova score scales and report the same
comprehensive set of test scores as other TerraNova test forms. The available scores include
the scale scores, OPI, normative scores of national percentile (NP), normal curve equivalents
(NCE), stanine, and grade equivalents (GE). Additionally, given that the English Language Arts
(ELA) is an integrated content area under the Common Core State Standards framework, an
ELA composite scale score and its related normative scores are available for the TerraNova
Common Core tests. This ELA composite scale score is defined as the average of a student’s
TerraNova Common Core Reading and TerraNova Common Core Language Arts scale scores.
2.
Table 1: Example of TerraNova Common Core Test Content Structure
Content Area Test
Level
Objective Measured
Mathematics 15 Geometry Computation and Numerical
Estimation
Measurement and Data Data Analysis, Statistics, and
Probability
Number and Operation in Base Ten Geometry and Spatial Sense
Number and Operation — Fractions Measurement
Operations/Algebraic Thinking Number and Number Relations
Operation Concepts
Patterns, Functions, Algebra
Problem Solving and Reasoning
Reading 16 Craft & Structure Analyze Text
Integration Knowledge & Ideas Basic Understanding
Key Ideas & Details Evaluate/Extend Meaning
Reading Informational Text Reading and Writing Strategies
Language Arts 16 Conventions of Standard English Editing Skills
Knowledge of Language Sentence Structure
Production and Distribution Writing Writing Strategies
Research to Build and Present
Knowledge
Text Types & Purposes
Vocabulary Acquisition and Use
Given that school districts and states are starting the transition to the Common Core State
Standards, the TerraNova Common Core tests may appear to be more difficult than the
TerraNova 3 existing test forms. Comparison of the test p-values (average of estimated item
national p-values) indicated that, on average, these test forms match well with the TerraNova 3
Multiple Assessments tests in terms of test difficulty. Table 2 provides the comparison results,
where Diff1 and Diff2 are the average p-value differences, between the TerraNova Common
Core Form 1 test and the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments test, the TerraNova Common Core
Form 2 test and the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments test, respectively. The average p-values
for the Reading and Language Arts are calculated by combining all items in the Reading and
Language Arts tests at a test level together. The average p-value differences, although most
of them are negative (indicating the TerraNova Common Core tests might be more difficult
than the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments tests), are very small. For example, the TerraNova
Common Core Form 1 level 15 Mathematics test has an average national p-value 0.56 and the
TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments test has an average p-value 0.57.
TerraNova Common Core
3.
Table 2: Test Average p-value Comparison
Content Area Test
Level
TerraNova 3 TerraNova
Common Core
TerraNova
Common Core
Multiple
Assessments
Form 1 Diff 1 Form 2 Diff 2
Reading &
Language Arts 13 0.67 0.66 -0.01 0.65 -0.02
14 0.67 0.68 0.01 0.68 0.01
15 0.69 0.66 -0.03 0.65 -0.03
16 0.63 0.60 -0.04 0.60 -0.03
17 0.59 0.61 0.01 0.59 0.00
18 0.60 0.58 -0.02 0.57 -0.02
Mathematics 13 0.68 0.60 -0.08 0.60 -0.08
14 0.56 0.52 -0.04 0.54 -0.02
15 0.57 0.56 -0.01 0.56 -0.02
16 0.54 0.53 -0.01 0.51 -0.03
17 0.49 0.47 -0.01 0.48 0.00
18 0.50 0.47 -0.04 0.49 -0.01
TerraNova Common Core
4.
The TerraNova Common Core tests, like any other TerraNova test forms, have been scaled
using the Item Response Theory (IRT) models and are on vertical scales. These allow TerraNova
customers to make meaningful longitudinal and across-grade score comparisons. Examination
and comparison of the test characteristic curves (TCC) and the standard error of measurement
(SEM) curves between the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments tests and the TerraNova
Common Core tests, as shown in Figure 1 for Reading (RD) level 16 and Mathematics (MA)
level 15, suggest that student performance on the two forms is expected to be similar (as
indicated by the closeness of the two TCC curves) with nearly the same test score accuracy
(shown by the closeness of the two SEM curves).
The TCC curves in Figure 1 also show that the TerraNova Common Core forms are slightly more
difficult than the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments forms. This is more apparent in the level
16 Reading test than in the level 15 Mathematics test. Comparisons at all other test levels and
content areas showed similar results.
2011 Norms
Test norms provide point estimates of performance for students in the norming group, at the
time the norms were derived. The TerraNova 3 2007 national norms, developed based on
empirical data collected in a large-scale national standardization study in 2007, provided
TerraNova 3 test score distribution estimates for the year 2007 student population in the
nation. When a student takes a TerraNova 3 test, his or her normative scores from the 2007
norms would be based on the comparison of his or her performance to his or her peers in the
nation from the year 2007.
Valid normative score and normative comparison require up-to-date test norms. Based on the
2007 norms, the 2011 norms for the TerraNova 3 and the Common Core tests are derived from
a large convenient sample tested in 2011, and a Bayesian Update statistical procedure. That
is, using the 2007 norms (estimated student score distributions) as the baseline, the 2011
student score distributions are estimated by updating the 2007 distributions with information
extracted from the large convenient sample data collected in 2011.
TerraNova Common Core
Copyright © 2012 by CTB/McGraw-Hill LLC. TerraNova is a trademark of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Individuals may copy,
download, and/or print this document.
Figure 1: TCC and SEM Com
(TNCC = TerraNova Common Core; TN3 = TerraNova 3)
The changes between the 2007 and 2011 norms vary by grade and content area. The changes
are minor overall. In most cases, the differences on the national percentile (NP) values of a
given scale score are within 1 to 2 percentile ranks. Taking the Grade 3 spring norms as an
example, Table 3 provides the NP value changes for scale scores at the 2007 norms 10th,
25th, 50th, 75th, and the 90th national percentiles. A Reading scale score of 579 would put a
grade 3 student at the 10th national percentile using the 2007 norms. In the 2011 norms, the
scale score is at the 8th national percentile.
Table 3: National Percentile Changes for Selected Scale Scores in Grade 3
Reading Language Arts Mathematics
2007 NP Scale
Score
2011 NP Scale
Score
2011 NP Scale
Score
2011 NP
10 579 8 569 10 559 9
25 606 23 596 26 587 24
50 629 49 622 51 613 51
75 650 76 648 75 638 76
25 669 91 673 90 662 91
Please visit CTB.com/TerraNovaCommonCore for additional information.
Terra nova information sheet white-color print
Terra nova information sheet white-color print

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

BFL med stöd av digitala verktyg
BFL med stöd av digitala verktygBFL med stöd av digitala verktyg
BFL med stöd av digitala verktygSylvia Svenungsson
 
150218 i pad grundutbildning handledningar
150218 i pad grundutbildning handledningar150218 i pad grundutbildning handledningar
150218 i pad grundutbildning handledningarSylvia Svenungsson
 
Perusyrtit tillistä timjamiin
Perusyrtit tillistä timjamiinPerusyrtit tillistä timjamiin
Perusyrtit tillistä timjamiinLeena Huhtama
 
I pad grundutbildning kvarnbergsskolan
I pad grundutbildning kvarnbergsskolanI pad grundutbildning kvarnbergsskolan
I pad grundutbildning kvarnbergsskolanSylvia Svenungsson
 
Function of human resource management
Function of human resource managementFunction of human resource management
Function of human resource managementthilivhali calvin
 
Erikoisemmat yrtit steviasta yrtti-iisoon
Erikoisemmat yrtit steviasta yrtti-iisoonErikoisemmat yrtit steviasta yrtti-iisoon
Erikoisemmat yrtit steviasta yrtti-iisoonLeena Huhtama
 
Chilin, paprikan,tomaatin ja kurkun kotiviljely
Chilin, paprikan,tomaatin ja kurkun kotiviljelyChilin, paprikan,tomaatin ja kurkun kotiviljely
Chilin, paprikan,tomaatin ja kurkun kotiviljelyLeena Huhtama
 
Information och inspiration om digitala verktyg som stöd i Huddinge
Information och inspiration om digitala verktyg som stöd i HuddingeInformation och inspiration om digitala verktyg som stöd i Huddinge
Information och inspiration om digitala verktyg som stöd i HuddingeSylvia Svenungsson
 
Yrttiviljelyn perusteet
Yrttiviljelyn perusteetYrttiviljelyn perusteet
Yrttiviljelyn perusteetLeena Huhtama
 
Company profile enos bus services
Company profile enos bus servicesCompany profile enos bus services
Company profile enos bus servicesthilivhali calvin
 

Viewers also liked (16)

BFL med stöd av digitala verktyg
BFL med stöd av digitala verktygBFL med stöd av digitala verktyg
BFL med stöd av digitala verktyg
 
Syötäviä kukkia
Syötäviä kukkiaSyötäviä kukkia
Syötäviä kukkia
 
150218 i pad grundutbildning handledningar
150218 i pad grundutbildning handledningar150218 i pad grundutbildning handledningar
150218 i pad grundutbildning handledningar
 
Perusyrtit tillistä timjamiin
Perusyrtit tillistä timjamiinPerusyrtit tillistä timjamiin
Perusyrtit tillistä timjamiin
 
I pad grundutbildning kvarnbergsskolan
I pad grundutbildning kvarnbergsskolanI pad grundutbildning kvarnbergsskolan
I pad grundutbildning kvarnbergsskolan
 
Ao ni-doi
Ao ni-doiAo ni-doi
Ao ni-doi
 
Dr projektet slides_pdf
Dr projektet slides_pdfDr projektet slides_pdf
Dr projektet slides_pdf
 
Function of human resource management
Function of human resource managementFunction of human resource management
Function of human resource management
 
Teachmeet Huddinge 2015
Teachmeet Huddinge 2015Teachmeet Huddinge 2015
Teachmeet Huddinge 2015
 
Corporate Party Entertainment
Corporate Party EntertainmentCorporate Party Entertainment
Corporate Party Entertainment
 
Erikoisemmat yrtit steviasta yrtti-iisoon
Erikoisemmat yrtit steviasta yrtti-iisoonErikoisemmat yrtit steviasta yrtti-iisoon
Erikoisemmat yrtit steviasta yrtti-iisoon
 
Corporate Party Entertainment
Corporate Party EntertainmentCorporate Party Entertainment
Corporate Party Entertainment
 
Chilin, paprikan,tomaatin ja kurkun kotiviljely
Chilin, paprikan,tomaatin ja kurkun kotiviljelyChilin, paprikan,tomaatin ja kurkun kotiviljely
Chilin, paprikan,tomaatin ja kurkun kotiviljely
 
Information och inspiration om digitala verktyg som stöd i Huddinge
Information och inspiration om digitala verktyg som stöd i HuddingeInformation och inspiration om digitala verktyg som stöd i Huddinge
Information och inspiration om digitala verktyg som stöd i Huddinge
 
Yrttiviljelyn perusteet
Yrttiviljelyn perusteetYrttiviljelyn perusteet
Yrttiviljelyn perusteet
 
Company profile enos bus services
Company profile enos bus servicesCompany profile enos bus services
Company profile enos bus services
 

Similar to Terra nova information sheet white-color print

Administering & scoring tabe 9 10
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10Administering & scoring tabe 9 10
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10SABES
 
Toeicbridgeanderinremoteclasses 210503053848
Toeicbridgeanderinremoteclasses 210503053848Toeicbridgeanderinremoteclasses 210503053848
Toeicbridgeanderinremoteclasses 210503053848Mamoru "Bobby" Takahashi
 
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian SchoolWhite Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian SchoolJim Hsia
 
ACL-WMT2013.A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems i...
ACL-WMT2013.A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems i...ACL-WMT2013.A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems i...
ACL-WMT2013.A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems i...Lifeng (Aaron) Han
 
Cyprus_paper-final_D.O.Santos_et_al
Cyprus_paper-final_D.O.Santos_et_alCyprus_paper-final_D.O.Santos_et_al
Cyprus_paper-final_D.O.Santos_et_alVictor Santos
 
Vertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale ScoresVertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale Scoresguest3921f8
 
TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089
TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089
TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089Elizabeth Mohr
 
TORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third Edition
TORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third EditionTORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third Edition
TORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third Editionmlegan31
 
Method effects on reading comprehension test performance
Method effects on reading comprehension test performanceMethod effects on reading comprehension test performance
Method effects on reading comprehension test performanceMasoomehVedadtaghavi
 
Pa%20 common%20core%20alignment%20study%20report%20june%202010
Pa%20 common%20core%20alignment%20study%20report%20june%202010Pa%20 common%20core%20alignment%20study%20report%20june%202010
Pa%20 common%20core%20alignment%20study%20report%20june%202010Julie Davis
 
Accuracy In The Scoring Of Writing Studies Of Reliability And Validity Using...
Accuracy In The Scoring Of Writing  Studies Of Reliability And Validity Using...Accuracy In The Scoring Of Writing  Studies Of Reliability And Validity Using...
Accuracy In The Scoring Of Writing Studies Of Reliability And Validity Using...Karla Long
 
MT SUMMIT13.Language-independent Model for Machine Translation Evaluation wit...
MT SUMMIT13.Language-independent Model for Machine Translation Evaluation wit...MT SUMMIT13.Language-independent Model for Machine Translation Evaluation wit...
MT SUMMIT13.Language-independent Model for Machine Translation Evaluation wit...Lifeng (Aaron) Han
 
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy CoachesAccountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coachesemengist
 
Using Probability Analysis in Investigating Denotative Values on Teachers’ Pe...
Using Probability Analysis in Investigating Denotative Values on Teachers’ Pe...Using Probability Analysis in Investigating Denotative Values on Teachers’ Pe...
Using Probability Analysis in Investigating Denotative Values on Teachers’ Pe...iosrjce
 
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla Final
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla FinalSerce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla Final
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla FinalAlberto Christin
 
Changing issues, changing questions, changing approaches: An overview of rese...
Changing issues, changing questions, changing approaches: An overview of rese...Changing issues, changing questions, changing approaches: An overview of rese...
Changing issues, changing questions, changing approaches: An overview of rese...Centre for Higher Education Development UCT
 

Similar to Terra nova information sheet white-color print (20)

Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10Administering & scoring tabe 9 10
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10
 
Toeicbridgeanderinremoteclasses 210503053848
Toeicbridgeanderinremoteclasses 210503053848Toeicbridgeanderinremoteclasses 210503053848
Toeicbridgeanderinremoteclasses 210503053848
 
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian SchoolWhite Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
 
ACL-WMT2013.A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems i...
ACL-WMT2013.A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems i...ACL-WMT2013.A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems i...
ACL-WMT2013.A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems i...
 
Cyprus_paper-final_D.O.Santos_et_al
Cyprus_paper-final_D.O.Santos_et_alCyprus_paper-final_D.O.Santos_et_al
Cyprus_paper-final_D.O.Santos_et_al
 
Vertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale ScoresVertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale Scores
 
TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089
TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089
TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089
 
TORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third Edition
TORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third EditionTORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third Edition
TORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third Edition
 
Method effects on reading comprehension test performance
Method effects on reading comprehension test performanceMethod effects on reading comprehension test performance
Method effects on reading comprehension test performance
 
TerraNova
TerraNova TerraNova
TerraNova
 
Pa%20 common%20core%20alignment%20study%20report%20june%202010
Pa%20 common%20core%20alignment%20study%20report%20june%202010Pa%20 common%20core%20alignment%20study%20report%20june%202010
Pa%20 common%20core%20alignment%20study%20report%20june%202010
 
Accuracy In The Scoring Of Writing Studies Of Reliability And Validity Using...
Accuracy In The Scoring Of Writing  Studies Of Reliability And Validity Using...Accuracy In The Scoring Of Writing  Studies Of Reliability And Validity Using...
Accuracy In The Scoring Of Writing Studies Of Reliability And Validity Using...
 
MT SUMMIT13.Language-independent Model for Machine Translation Evaluation wit...
MT SUMMIT13.Language-independent Model for Machine Translation Evaluation wit...MT SUMMIT13.Language-independent Model for Machine Translation Evaluation wit...
MT SUMMIT13.Language-independent Model for Machine Translation Evaluation wit...
 
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy CoachesAccountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
 
School_Quality_Guide_2014_EMS_X125
School_Quality_Guide_2014_EMS_X125School_Quality_Guide_2014_EMS_X125
School_Quality_Guide_2014_EMS_X125
 
Using Probability Analysis in Investigating Denotative Values on Teachers’ Pe...
Using Probability Analysis in Investigating Denotative Values on Teachers’ Pe...Using Probability Analysis in Investigating Denotative Values on Teachers’ Pe...
Using Probability Analysis in Investigating Denotative Values on Teachers’ Pe...
 
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla Final
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla FinalSerce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla Final
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla Final
 
Changing issues, changing questions, changing approaches: An overview of rese...
Changing issues, changing questions, changing approaches: An overview of rese...Changing issues, changing questions, changing approaches: An overview of rese...
Changing issues, changing questions, changing approaches: An overview of rese...
 
Nat faq
Nat faqNat faq
Nat faq
 

Recently uploaded

Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppCeline George
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfchloefrazer622
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSDStaff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 

Terra nova information sheet white-color print

  • 1. Available in test levels 13 through 18 in Reading, Language Arts, and Mathematics, the TerraNova™ Common Core tests are a set of TerraNova Multiple Assessments that measure the Common Core State Standards. These test forms share the same selective-response items with the TerraNova, Third Edition (TerraNova 3) Survey tests of the same test level and content area. The additional items, including constructed-response items and various innovative item types such as performance tasks, were specifically developed to measure the Common Core State Standards. Items in these tests are aligned to both the TerraNova test content standards as well as the Common Core State Standards. Such dual alignment allows the objective (standard) level scores to be reported under both standard frameworks. The TerraNova Common Core tests, with 2011 national norms, can provide teachers, schools, and districts early diagnostic insight of student performance according to the Common Core State Standards provide a smooth transition to these standards. Content Structure Items in the TerraNova Common Core tests are aligned to both the TerraNova content standards and the Common Core State Standards. The differences and overlaps between the TerraNova content standards framework and the Common Core State Standards framework vary by test level and content area. As an example, Table 1 shows the objectives measured under each content framework in the TerraNova Common Core Form 1 level 15 Mathematics , level 16 Reading, and level 16 Language Arts tests. Objective level scores—Objective Performance Index (OPI) and mastery level (Low, Moderate, High) for each objective—are reported to provide student performance information on the objectives that have sufficient numbers of items associated. The TerraNova objective level scores are reported when there are at least 4 items measuring the objective. The Common Core objective level scores are reported when there are at least 3 items measuring the objective. TerraNova Common Core TerraNova Multiple Assessments: Measuring the Common Core State Standards The TerraNova Common Core tests, with 2011 national norms, can provide teachers, schools, and districts early diagnostic insight of student performance according to the Common Core State Standards provide a smooth transition to these standards.
  • 2. TerraNova Common Core Score Reporting The TerraNova Common Core tests are on the TerraNova score scales and report the same comprehensive set of test scores as other TerraNova test forms. The available scores include the scale scores, OPI, normative scores of national percentile (NP), normal curve equivalents (NCE), stanine, and grade equivalents (GE). Additionally, given that the English Language Arts (ELA) is an integrated content area under the Common Core State Standards framework, an ELA composite scale score and its related normative scores are available for the TerraNova Common Core tests. This ELA composite scale score is defined as the average of a student’s TerraNova Common Core Reading and TerraNova Common Core Language Arts scale scores. 2. Table 1: Example of TerraNova Common Core Test Content Structure Content Area Test Level Objective Measured Mathematics 15 Geometry Computation and Numerical Estimation Measurement and Data Data Analysis, Statistics, and Probability Number and Operation in Base Ten Geometry and Spatial Sense Number and Operation — Fractions Measurement Operations/Algebraic Thinking Number and Number Relations Operation Concepts Patterns, Functions, Algebra Problem Solving and Reasoning Reading 16 Craft & Structure Analyze Text Integration Knowledge & Ideas Basic Understanding Key Ideas & Details Evaluate/Extend Meaning Reading Informational Text Reading and Writing Strategies Language Arts 16 Conventions of Standard English Editing Skills Knowledge of Language Sentence Structure Production and Distribution Writing Writing Strategies Research to Build and Present Knowledge Text Types & Purposes Vocabulary Acquisition and Use
  • 3. Given that school districts and states are starting the transition to the Common Core State Standards, the TerraNova Common Core tests may appear to be more difficult than the TerraNova 3 existing test forms. Comparison of the test p-values (average of estimated item national p-values) indicated that, on average, these test forms match well with the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments tests in terms of test difficulty. Table 2 provides the comparison results, where Diff1 and Diff2 are the average p-value differences, between the TerraNova Common Core Form 1 test and the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments test, the TerraNova Common Core Form 2 test and the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments test, respectively. The average p-values for the Reading and Language Arts are calculated by combining all items in the Reading and Language Arts tests at a test level together. The average p-value differences, although most of them are negative (indicating the TerraNova Common Core tests might be more difficult than the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments tests), are very small. For example, the TerraNova Common Core Form 1 level 15 Mathematics test has an average national p-value 0.56 and the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments test has an average p-value 0.57. TerraNova Common Core 3. Table 2: Test Average p-value Comparison Content Area Test Level TerraNova 3 TerraNova Common Core TerraNova Common Core Multiple Assessments Form 1 Diff 1 Form 2 Diff 2 Reading & Language Arts 13 0.67 0.66 -0.01 0.65 -0.02 14 0.67 0.68 0.01 0.68 0.01 15 0.69 0.66 -0.03 0.65 -0.03 16 0.63 0.60 -0.04 0.60 -0.03 17 0.59 0.61 0.01 0.59 0.00 18 0.60 0.58 -0.02 0.57 -0.02 Mathematics 13 0.68 0.60 -0.08 0.60 -0.08 14 0.56 0.52 -0.04 0.54 -0.02 15 0.57 0.56 -0.01 0.56 -0.02 16 0.54 0.53 -0.01 0.51 -0.03 17 0.49 0.47 -0.01 0.48 0.00 18 0.50 0.47 -0.04 0.49 -0.01
  • 4. TerraNova Common Core 4. The TerraNova Common Core tests, like any other TerraNova test forms, have been scaled using the Item Response Theory (IRT) models and are on vertical scales. These allow TerraNova customers to make meaningful longitudinal and across-grade score comparisons. Examination and comparison of the test characteristic curves (TCC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) curves between the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments tests and the TerraNova Common Core tests, as shown in Figure 1 for Reading (RD) level 16 and Mathematics (MA) level 15, suggest that student performance on the two forms is expected to be similar (as indicated by the closeness of the two TCC curves) with nearly the same test score accuracy (shown by the closeness of the two SEM curves). The TCC curves in Figure 1 also show that the TerraNova Common Core forms are slightly more difficult than the TerraNova 3 Multiple Assessments forms. This is more apparent in the level 16 Reading test than in the level 15 Mathematics test. Comparisons at all other test levels and content areas showed similar results. 2011 Norms Test norms provide point estimates of performance for students in the norming group, at the time the norms were derived. The TerraNova 3 2007 national norms, developed based on empirical data collected in a large-scale national standardization study in 2007, provided TerraNova 3 test score distribution estimates for the year 2007 student population in the nation. When a student takes a TerraNova 3 test, his or her normative scores from the 2007 norms would be based on the comparison of his or her performance to his or her peers in the nation from the year 2007. Valid normative score and normative comparison require up-to-date test norms. Based on the 2007 norms, the 2011 norms for the TerraNova 3 and the Common Core tests are derived from a large convenient sample tested in 2011, and a Bayesian Update statistical procedure. That is, using the 2007 norms (estimated student score distributions) as the baseline, the 2011 student score distributions are estimated by updating the 2007 distributions with information extracted from the large convenient sample data collected in 2011.
  • 5. TerraNova Common Core Copyright © 2012 by CTB/McGraw-Hill LLC. TerraNova is a trademark of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Individuals may copy, download, and/or print this document. Figure 1: TCC and SEM Com (TNCC = TerraNova Common Core; TN3 = TerraNova 3) The changes between the 2007 and 2011 norms vary by grade and content area. The changes are minor overall. In most cases, the differences on the national percentile (NP) values of a given scale score are within 1 to 2 percentile ranks. Taking the Grade 3 spring norms as an example, Table 3 provides the NP value changes for scale scores at the 2007 norms 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and the 90th national percentiles. A Reading scale score of 579 would put a grade 3 student at the 10th national percentile using the 2007 norms. In the 2011 norms, the scale score is at the 8th national percentile. Table 3: National Percentile Changes for Selected Scale Scores in Grade 3 Reading Language Arts Mathematics 2007 NP Scale Score 2011 NP Scale Score 2011 NP Scale Score 2011 NP 10 579 8 569 10 559 9 25 606 23 596 26 587 24 50 629 49 622 51 613 51 75 650 76 648 75 638 76 25 669 91 673 90 662 91 Please visit CTB.com/TerraNovaCommonCore for additional information.