SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Student Name: Birth Date: June 2001 Student ID: 40992
Teacher: Test Date: May 2015 Form: C
School: Grade: 7 Level: 17
District: Norms: Spring 2005
RS TI SS GE NPR
770 12.9+ 99%
20 20 779 12.9+ 99%
49 50 761 12.9+ 99%
761 12.9+ 99%
30 30 814 12.9+ 99%
18 20 707 12.9+ 85%
20 20 844 12.9+ 99% 9
762 12.9+ 98%
56 57 796 12.9+ 99%
18 20 728 12.9+ 92%
764 12.9+ 99%
40 40 842 12.9+ 99%
38 40 731 12.9+ 95%
Performance Levels are defined by the percentile-rank grouping as indicated below:
5089
Reading Total 9 Well Above Average
Vocabulary 9 Well Above Average
Spelling Well Above Average
Language Usage & Expression 9 Well Above Average
Language Mechanics 7 Above Average
Reading Comprehension
Composite or Subtest NS Performance Level
TerraNova Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills ™ Brewer Testing Services © 2015 www.brewertesting.com
ETHAN A MOHR
ELIZABETH MOHR
MOHR RESULTS ACADEMY
Brewer Testing Services
9 Well Above Average
Language Total 9 Well Above Average
Computation 8 Well Above Average
Mathematics Total 9 Well Above Average
Concepts & Problem Solving 9 Well Above Average
Social Studies 8 Well Above Average
Core Total 9 Well Above Average
Science 9 Well Above Average
NP Range Performance Level
1%-10% Weak
11%-40% Below Average
RS=Raw Score (# student answered correctly) TI=Total Items Tested SS=Scale Score
GE=Grade Equivalent NPR=National Percentile Rank
NS=National Stanine (a coarse grouping of percentile ranks that range from 1 to 9 and have an average value of 5)
41%-59% Average
60%-89% Above Average
Page 1 of 4
90%-99% Well Above Average
5089
Profile Summary Report for ETHAN A MOHR Test Date: May 2015
Page 2 of 4
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Reading Total
Vocabulary
Reading Comprehension
Language Total
Language Usage &
Expression
Language Mechanics
Spelling
Mathematics Total
Concepts & Problem
Solving
Computation
Core Total
Science
Social Studies
5089
Ethan's performance in the Math Total area was in the Well Above Average range compared to the performance of a national sample of 7th grade students. His
percentile score indicates that his Math Total score was equal to or higher than 98% of the students in the national 7th grade comparison group. The Math Total area
includes Math Concepts, Math Problem Solving, and Math Computation. The Math Concepts and Problem Solving test requires that students demonstrate an
understanding of, and ability to apply, a variety of concepts in the following areas: numeration, number theory, data interpretation, pre-algebra, algebra,
measurement and geometry. The Math Computation test provides an appropriate representation of the core computational skills students are learning at their grade
level. Ethan's Math Computation score was in the Well Above Average range. His Math Concepts and Problem Solving score was in the Well Above Average range.
The Core Total score includes the Reading Total score, the Math Total score and the Language Total score. Ethan's Core Total performance was equal to or higher
than 99% of the students in the national 7th grade comparison group.
Ethan's performance in the Science area was in the Well Above Average range. His Social Studies score was in the Well Above Average range. The knowledge and
skills measured by the Science test comes from the areas of life science, earth and space sciences, biology, chemistry, and physical sciences. The content of the
Social Studies questions are taken from the areas of geography, history, economics, government, citizenship, and other sociological patterns.
Ethan took the TerraNova Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills (CTBS) in May 2015. His performance is summarized in the table and graph on this report. Scale
Scores compare Ethan's performance with that of other 7th grade students in a national sample. The National Percentile Rank Score indicates what percentage of
the sample group Ethan scored as well as or better than. Ethan's performance in the Reading Total area was in the Well Above Average range with a national
percentile score of 99%. The Reading Total area includes the Vocabulary and Comprehension subtests. The Vocabulary portion of the test assesses general
vocabulary knowledge. Students are given grade-appropriate reading vocabulary and the meanings of words are tested in context. The Comprehension test
assesses comprehension through the use of multiple-choice questions following a reading passage. Students must construct meaning from passages, requiring them
to extract details, analyze characters, identify main ideas, interpret events, distinguish between fact and opinion, as well as draw upon their own background
knowledge. Ethan's performance was in the Well Above Average range in Vocabulary and the Well Above Average range in Comprehension.
Ethan's performance in the Language Total area was in the Well Above Average range with a national percentile score of 99%. The Language Total subtests include
Language Usage and Expression and Language Mechanics. Ethan's performance in Language was in the Well Above Average range with a national percentile score
being equal to or higher than 99% of the 7th grade students in the national sample. The Language test assesses the proper use of capitalization, punctuation, skill in
usage and expression, proofreading and editing in grade-appropriate sentences, poems, passages, letters, clauses, quotations and dialogue. Ethan's performance in
Spelling was in the Well Above Average range. Spelling is not included in the Core Total. The emphasis is on the recognition of commonly misspelled words and use
of spelling rules, as well as identifying correctly spelled words in the context of sentences and phrases, which is a valuable proofreading skill.
Profile Summary Report for ETHAN A MOHR Test Date: May 2015
Page 3 of 4
5089
Pat Brewer, M.Ed. & Dempsey Brewer, M.E.
Brewer Testing Services
East Bend, NC 27018
Phone (336) 699-3997
www.brewertesting.com
DESCRIPTIVE CATEGORY: Gives a verbal description for the commonly used standard score.
SCALE SCORE (SS): Raw scores are converted to scale scores. The scale score tells the distance of the student’s raw score from the mean raw score, taking into
account the standard deviation (degree of variability). In other words, the scale score describes a student’s location on an achievement continuum. The scale
corresponds to typical performances of grade groups on each test at certain times of the year. They have no built-in meaning. These numbers are used to compute
other statistics.
GRADE EQUIVALENT (GE): This score is often misinterpreted. Grade level scores have limited meaning since students at different grades take different levels of
the test and each level has different content. Keep in mind that your student is only being compared with other same grade students in the “normed” sample. The
students are not being compared to other grade levels.
EXPLANATION OF REPORT TERMS
RS-RAW SCORE: The number of questions a student gets right.
TI-Total items in the subtest.
NATIONAL STANINE (NS): This statistic is a coarse grouping of percentile ranks or normalized standard scores that range from 1 to 9. They are often used with
large groups of students to determine specific skill weaknesses for the purpose of small group instruction. They do not describe a student’s developmental level or
measure growth.
NOTE: The percentile ranking (NPR) is the best number to use to see how your student compares with other students of the same age and grade. It is also helpful
for measuring your student’s growth from year to year. If your child scores in the 85% this year, and does similar in a year, then s/he has made a year’s growth in that
area.
NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK (NPR): These percentiles show a student’s standing within the group of students in the same grade that was tested at the same
time of year during the national standardization. These scores are especially useful for profile analysis and determining the areas of relative strength and weakness
for an individual student. A percentile rank of 68 means that the student scored better than 68 percent of the other children in the same grade in the norming sample.
Page 4 of 4

More Related Content

What's hot

Language testing (Testing Vocabulary)-Adapted from Madsen
Language testing (Testing Vocabulary)-Adapted from MadsenLanguage testing (Testing Vocabulary)-Adapted from Madsen
Language testing (Testing Vocabulary)-Adapted from MadsenMelva Simangunsong
 
Oral Presentstion 1 Andrew
Oral Presentstion 1 AndrewOral Presentstion 1 Andrew
Oral Presentstion 1 Andrewguest19cc722
 
Completion And Short Answer Items
Completion And Short Answer ItemsCompletion And Short Answer Items
Completion And Short Answer ItemsKat OngCan
 
Metzger DLC Action Research Slideshow
Metzger DLC Action Research SlideshowMetzger DLC Action Research Slideshow
Metzger DLC Action Research Slideshowjscypinski
 
2010 P5 And P6 Principals Dialogue Collated Version
2010 P5 And P6 Principals Dialogue   Collated Version2010 P5 And P6 Principals Dialogue   Collated Version
2010 P5 And P6 Principals Dialogue Collated Versionyapsmail
 
Testing Grammar
Testing GrammarTesting Grammar
Testing Grammarsongoten77
 
Ccss feedback toolgeneralallfinal62512-toshare
Ccss feedback toolgeneralallfinal62512-toshareCcss feedback toolgeneralallfinal62512-toshare
Ccss feedback toolgeneralallfinal62512-toshareeducatorscooperative
 
Elem edTPA Training ECU
Elem edTPA Training ECUElem edTPA Training ECU
Elem edTPA Training ECULiz Fogarty
 
Intensive English Curriculum - Pre-Secondary
Intensive English Curriculum - Pre-SecondaryIntensive English Curriculum - Pre-Secondary
Intensive English Curriculum - Pre-Secondaryqsiphuket
 
Administering The QRI4 Reading Inventory
Administering The QRI4 Reading InventoryAdministering The QRI4 Reading Inventory
Administering The QRI4 Reading InventoryJclark65
 

What's hot (18)

Language testing (Testing Vocabulary)-Adapted from Madsen
Language testing (Testing Vocabulary)-Adapted from MadsenLanguage testing (Testing Vocabulary)-Adapted from Madsen
Language testing (Testing Vocabulary)-Adapted from Madsen
 
Peabody Picture Vocabulary, Third Edition
Peabody Picture Vocabulary, Third EditionPeabody Picture Vocabulary, Third Edition
Peabody Picture Vocabulary, Third Edition
 
Oral Presentstion 1 Andrew
Oral Presentstion 1 AndrewOral Presentstion 1 Andrew
Oral Presentstion 1 Andrew
 
Completion And Short Answer Items
Completion And Short Answer ItemsCompletion And Short Answer Items
Completion And Short Answer Items
 
Writing objective test items
Writing objective test itemsWriting objective test items
Writing objective test items
 
Metzger DLC Action Research Slideshow
Metzger DLC Action Research SlideshowMetzger DLC Action Research Slideshow
Metzger DLC Action Research Slideshow
 
2010 P5 And P6 Principals Dialogue Collated Version
2010 P5 And P6 Principals Dialogue   Collated Version2010 P5 And P6 Principals Dialogue   Collated Version
2010 P5 And P6 Principals Dialogue Collated Version
 
Testing Grammar
Testing GrammarTesting Grammar
Testing Grammar
 
Ccss feedback toolgeneralallfinal62512-toshare
Ccss feedback toolgeneralallfinal62512-toshareCcss feedback toolgeneralallfinal62512-toshare
Ccss feedback toolgeneralallfinal62512-toshare
 
Carp powerpoint
Carp powerpointCarp powerpoint
Carp powerpoint
 
Elem edTPA Training ECU
Elem edTPA Training ECUElem edTPA Training ECU
Elem edTPA Training ECU
 
Matching type
Matching typeMatching type
Matching type
 
How to test vocabulary
How to test vocabularyHow to test vocabulary
How to test vocabulary
 
CogAt Parent Presentation
CogAt Parent PresentationCogAt Parent Presentation
CogAt Parent Presentation
 
True Or False
True Or FalseTrue Or False
True Or False
 
Intensive English Curriculum - Pre-Secondary
Intensive English Curriculum - Pre-SecondaryIntensive English Curriculum - Pre-Secondary
Intensive English Curriculum - Pre-Secondary
 
Administering The QRI4 Reading Inventory
Administering The QRI4 Reading InventoryAdministering The QRI4 Reading Inventory
Administering The QRI4 Reading Inventory
 
Cool tools phonological
Cool tools phonologicalCool tools phonological
Cool tools phonological
 

Viewers also liked

Morning Zeitgeist - July 2015
Morning Zeitgeist - July 2015Morning Zeitgeist - July 2015
Morning Zeitgeist - July 2015joelbeckerman
 
MLA Citation Lesson Plan
MLA Citation Lesson PlanMLA Citation Lesson Plan
MLA Citation Lesson Planmaryjasperse
 
Management of Organizations
Management of OrganizationsManagement of Organizations
Management of OrganizationsSadia Tasnim
 
2011 phase 2 engagement presentation
2011   phase 2 engagement presentation2011   phase 2 engagement presentation
2011 phase 2 engagement presentationshupey14
 
Tablet tools and micro tasks
Tablet tools and micro tasksTablet tools and micro tasks
Tablet tools and micro tasksmhilde
 
The Understanding the journey of data from the eyes of a practitioner
The Understanding the journey of data from the eyes of a practitionerThe Understanding the journey of data from the eyes of a practitioner
The Understanding the journey of data from the eyes of a practitionerSamayita Ghosh
 
Qualities of a white coral gemstone
Qualities of a white coral gemstoneQualities of a white coral gemstone
Qualities of a white coral gemstoneRed Coral Gemstone
 
National Responsible Gambling Programme Campaign by Student Village
National Responsible Gambling Programme Campaign by Student VillageNational Responsible Gambling Programme Campaign by Student Village
National Responsible Gambling Programme Campaign by Student VillageSamantha Joanne Van Zyl
 

Viewers also liked (17)

Morning Zeitgeist - July 2015
Morning Zeitgeist - July 2015Morning Zeitgeist - July 2015
Morning Zeitgeist - July 2015
 
MLA Citation Lesson Plan
MLA Citation Lesson PlanMLA Citation Lesson Plan
MLA Citation Lesson Plan
 
Flaws of red coral stone
Flaws of red coral stoneFlaws of red coral stone
Flaws of red coral stone
 
Management of Organizations
Management of OrganizationsManagement of Organizations
Management of Organizations
 
Oryantasyon
OryantasyonOryantasyon
Oryantasyon
 
FINAL CV
FINAL CVFINAL CV
FINAL CV
 
Güvenlik Bildirim Sistemi
Güvenlik Bildirim SistemiGüvenlik Bildirim Sistemi
Güvenlik Bildirim Sistemi
 
2011 phase 2 engagement presentation
2011   phase 2 engagement presentation2011   phase 2 engagement presentation
2011 phase 2 engagement presentation
 
Tablet tools and micro tasks
Tablet tools and micro tasksTablet tools and micro tasks
Tablet tools and micro tasks
 
Biancheria per la casa
Biancheria per la casaBiancheria per la casa
Biancheria per la casa
 
The Understanding the journey of data from the eyes of a practitioner
The Understanding the journey of data from the eyes of a practitionerThe Understanding the journey of data from the eyes of a practitioner
The Understanding the journey of data from the eyes of a practitioner
 
Qualities of a white coral gemstone
Qualities of a white coral gemstoneQualities of a white coral gemstone
Qualities of a white coral gemstone
 
Catalog 2016 2017
Catalog 2016 2017Catalog 2016 2017
Catalog 2016 2017
 
SUGATA GHOSH CV
SUGATA GHOSH CVSUGATA GHOSH CV
SUGATA GHOSH CV
 
Maravillas del mundo
Maravillas del mundoMaravillas del mundo
Maravillas del mundo
 
Mobil pazarlama
Mobil pazarlamaMobil pazarlama
Mobil pazarlama
 
National Responsible Gambling Programme Campaign by Student Village
National Responsible Gambling Programme Campaign by Student VillageNational Responsible Gambling Programme Campaign by Student Village
National Responsible Gambling Programme Campaign by Student Village
 

Similar to Student Achievement Report Summary

Year 7 Parents Information Evening
Year 7 Parents Information EveningYear 7 Parents Information Evening
Year 7 Parents Information EveningSimonBalle
 
Assessment Etil
Assessment EtilAssessment Etil
Assessment Etilmillerjtx
 
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docxWriting 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docxodiliagilby
 
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docxWriting 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docxbillylewis37150
 
Vertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale ScoresVertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale Scoresguest3921f8
 
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian SchoolWhite Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian SchoolJim Hsia
 
District 30 - 2011 ISAT
District 30 - 2011 ISATDistrict 30 - 2011 ISAT
District 30 - 2011 ISATAndrew Kohl
 
Sample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 English
Sample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 EnglishSample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 English
Sample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 EnglishJemark Pizon
 
Thomas jefferson high school
Thomas jefferson high schoolThomas jefferson high school
Thomas jefferson high schooldranalli1
 
Parent Presentation for MCAS Night 2009
Parent Presentation for MCAS Night 2009Parent Presentation for MCAS Night 2009
Parent Presentation for MCAS Night 2009Nadene Stein
 
Assessment and Evaluation GROUP 3.pdf
Assessment and Evaluation GROUP 3.pdfAssessment and Evaluation GROUP 3.pdf
Assessment and Evaluation GROUP 3.pdfkimberlyndelgado18
 
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumsptonEd6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumsptonAlana Cumpston
 
Parent+response+reflection+1[1]
Parent+response+reflection+1[1]Parent+response+reflection+1[1]
Parent+response+reflection+1[1]Mercedes Perezgil
 
Language testing final
Language testing finalLanguage testing final
Language testing finaledac4co
 

Similar to Student Achievement Report Summary (20)

TerraNova
TerraNova TerraNova
TerraNova
 
Year 7 Parents Information Evening
Year 7 Parents Information EveningYear 7 Parents Information Evening
Year 7 Parents Information Evening
 
Case study guidelines
Case study guidelinesCase study guidelines
Case study guidelines
 
Norm Reference Test
Norm Reference TestNorm Reference Test
Norm Reference Test
 
Nat faq
Nat faqNat faq
Nat faq
 
Assessment Etil
Assessment EtilAssessment Etil
Assessment Etil
 
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docxWriting 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
 
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docxWriting 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
Writing 2011NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS AT.docx
 
Vertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale ScoresVertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale Scores
 
Case study guidelines
Case study guidelinesCase study guidelines
Case study guidelines
 
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian SchoolWhite Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
White Paper: Academic Achievement at Milpitas Christian School
 
District 30 - 2011 ISAT
District 30 - 2011 ISATDistrict 30 - 2011 ISAT
District 30 - 2011 ISAT
 
Sample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 English
Sample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 EnglishSample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 English
Sample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 English
 
Thomas jefferson high school
Thomas jefferson high schoolThomas jefferson high school
Thomas jefferson high school
 
Parent Presentation for MCAS Night 2009
Parent Presentation for MCAS Night 2009Parent Presentation for MCAS Night 2009
Parent Presentation for MCAS Night 2009
 
Assessment and Evaluation GROUP 3.pdf
Assessment and Evaluation GROUP 3.pdfAssessment and Evaluation GROUP 3.pdf
Assessment and Evaluation GROUP 3.pdf
 
CogAt Introduction
CogAt IntroductionCogAt Introduction
CogAt Introduction
 
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumsptonEd6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
 
Parent+response+reflection+1[1]
Parent+response+reflection+1[1]Parent+response+reflection+1[1]
Parent+response+reflection+1[1]
 
Language testing final
Language testing finalLanguage testing final
Language testing final
 

Student Achievement Report Summary

  • 1. Student Name: Birth Date: June 2001 Student ID: 40992 Teacher: Test Date: May 2015 Form: C School: Grade: 7 Level: 17 District: Norms: Spring 2005 RS TI SS GE NPR 770 12.9+ 99% 20 20 779 12.9+ 99% 49 50 761 12.9+ 99% 761 12.9+ 99% 30 30 814 12.9+ 99% 18 20 707 12.9+ 85% 20 20 844 12.9+ 99% 9 762 12.9+ 98% 56 57 796 12.9+ 99% 18 20 728 12.9+ 92% 764 12.9+ 99% 40 40 842 12.9+ 99% 38 40 731 12.9+ 95% Performance Levels are defined by the percentile-rank grouping as indicated below: 5089 Reading Total 9 Well Above Average Vocabulary 9 Well Above Average Spelling Well Above Average Language Usage & Expression 9 Well Above Average Language Mechanics 7 Above Average Reading Comprehension Composite or Subtest NS Performance Level TerraNova Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills ™ Brewer Testing Services © 2015 www.brewertesting.com ETHAN A MOHR ELIZABETH MOHR MOHR RESULTS ACADEMY Brewer Testing Services 9 Well Above Average Language Total 9 Well Above Average Computation 8 Well Above Average Mathematics Total 9 Well Above Average Concepts & Problem Solving 9 Well Above Average Social Studies 8 Well Above Average Core Total 9 Well Above Average Science 9 Well Above Average NP Range Performance Level 1%-10% Weak 11%-40% Below Average RS=Raw Score (# student answered correctly) TI=Total Items Tested SS=Scale Score GE=Grade Equivalent NPR=National Percentile Rank NS=National Stanine (a coarse grouping of percentile ranks that range from 1 to 9 and have an average value of 5) 41%-59% Average 60%-89% Above Average Page 1 of 4 90%-99% Well Above Average
  • 2. 5089 Profile Summary Report for ETHAN A MOHR Test Date: May 2015 Page 2 of 4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Reading Total Vocabulary Reading Comprehension Language Total Language Usage & Expression Language Mechanics Spelling Mathematics Total Concepts & Problem Solving Computation Core Total Science Social Studies
  • 3. 5089 Ethan's performance in the Math Total area was in the Well Above Average range compared to the performance of a national sample of 7th grade students. His percentile score indicates that his Math Total score was equal to or higher than 98% of the students in the national 7th grade comparison group. The Math Total area includes Math Concepts, Math Problem Solving, and Math Computation. The Math Concepts and Problem Solving test requires that students demonstrate an understanding of, and ability to apply, a variety of concepts in the following areas: numeration, number theory, data interpretation, pre-algebra, algebra, measurement and geometry. The Math Computation test provides an appropriate representation of the core computational skills students are learning at their grade level. Ethan's Math Computation score was in the Well Above Average range. His Math Concepts and Problem Solving score was in the Well Above Average range. The Core Total score includes the Reading Total score, the Math Total score and the Language Total score. Ethan's Core Total performance was equal to or higher than 99% of the students in the national 7th grade comparison group. Ethan's performance in the Science area was in the Well Above Average range. His Social Studies score was in the Well Above Average range. The knowledge and skills measured by the Science test comes from the areas of life science, earth and space sciences, biology, chemistry, and physical sciences. The content of the Social Studies questions are taken from the areas of geography, history, economics, government, citizenship, and other sociological patterns. Ethan took the TerraNova Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills (CTBS) in May 2015. His performance is summarized in the table and graph on this report. Scale Scores compare Ethan's performance with that of other 7th grade students in a national sample. The National Percentile Rank Score indicates what percentage of the sample group Ethan scored as well as or better than. Ethan's performance in the Reading Total area was in the Well Above Average range with a national percentile score of 99%. The Reading Total area includes the Vocabulary and Comprehension subtests. The Vocabulary portion of the test assesses general vocabulary knowledge. Students are given grade-appropriate reading vocabulary and the meanings of words are tested in context. The Comprehension test assesses comprehension through the use of multiple-choice questions following a reading passage. Students must construct meaning from passages, requiring them to extract details, analyze characters, identify main ideas, interpret events, distinguish between fact and opinion, as well as draw upon their own background knowledge. Ethan's performance was in the Well Above Average range in Vocabulary and the Well Above Average range in Comprehension. Ethan's performance in the Language Total area was in the Well Above Average range with a national percentile score of 99%. The Language Total subtests include Language Usage and Expression and Language Mechanics. Ethan's performance in Language was in the Well Above Average range with a national percentile score being equal to or higher than 99% of the 7th grade students in the national sample. The Language test assesses the proper use of capitalization, punctuation, skill in usage and expression, proofreading and editing in grade-appropriate sentences, poems, passages, letters, clauses, quotations and dialogue. Ethan's performance in Spelling was in the Well Above Average range. Spelling is not included in the Core Total. The emphasis is on the recognition of commonly misspelled words and use of spelling rules, as well as identifying correctly spelled words in the context of sentences and phrases, which is a valuable proofreading skill. Profile Summary Report for ETHAN A MOHR Test Date: May 2015 Page 3 of 4
  • 4. 5089 Pat Brewer, M.Ed. & Dempsey Brewer, M.E. Brewer Testing Services East Bend, NC 27018 Phone (336) 699-3997 www.brewertesting.com DESCRIPTIVE CATEGORY: Gives a verbal description for the commonly used standard score. SCALE SCORE (SS): Raw scores are converted to scale scores. The scale score tells the distance of the student’s raw score from the mean raw score, taking into account the standard deviation (degree of variability). In other words, the scale score describes a student’s location on an achievement continuum. The scale corresponds to typical performances of grade groups on each test at certain times of the year. They have no built-in meaning. These numbers are used to compute other statistics. GRADE EQUIVALENT (GE): This score is often misinterpreted. Grade level scores have limited meaning since students at different grades take different levels of the test and each level has different content. Keep in mind that your student is only being compared with other same grade students in the “normed” sample. The students are not being compared to other grade levels. EXPLANATION OF REPORT TERMS RS-RAW SCORE: The number of questions a student gets right. TI-Total items in the subtest. NATIONAL STANINE (NS): This statistic is a coarse grouping of percentile ranks or normalized standard scores that range from 1 to 9. They are often used with large groups of students to determine specific skill weaknesses for the purpose of small group instruction. They do not describe a student’s developmental level or measure growth. NOTE: The percentile ranking (NPR) is the best number to use to see how your student compares with other students of the same age and grade. It is also helpful for measuring your student’s growth from year to year. If your child scores in the 85% this year, and does similar in a year, then s/he has made a year’s growth in that area. NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK (NPR): These percentiles show a student’s standing within the group of students in the same grade that was tested at the same time of year during the national standardization. These scores are especially useful for profile analysis and determining the areas of relative strength and weakness for an individual student. A percentile rank of 68 means that the student scored better than 68 percent of the other children in the same grade in the norming sample. Page 4 of 4