TEN-T Corridors & Challenges for Motorways of the Sea – funding and support framework into 2020


European Commission, DG MOVE
Jose Anselmo
TEN-T Policy, Motorways of the Sea
(MoS)
WHITE PAPER 2011 – TENT, CEF &
MoS 2012 and beyhond
TEN-T Corridors & Challenges for Motorways of the
Sea – funding and support framework into 2020

JUNE 2013 Salamanca
CENCYL
This is merely a presentation with illustrations as an
example, without any legal basis.
Se trata de uma apresentação com ilustrações (dados e
mapas) a titulo meramente exemplificativo e não de base
legal.
Se trata de una presentación cuyas ilustraciones (datos y
mapas) son meros ejemplos sin que representen base legal.

| 2Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area
PRESENTATION Outline
. (I) Transport Policy – White Paper (vision for 2050)
. (II) TEN-T and the new TEN-T Guidelines: 2030 Core and
2050 Comprehensive Network
. (III) CEF (connecting Europe facility) financial programme
for TENs 2014-2020 [ 51 bi € ]
. (IV) Motorways of the Seas – MoS: ongoing, Call 2012 & future
. Questions & Answers (Q&A)

This is merely a presentation with illustrations as an example, without any legal basis.
Se trata de uma apresentação com ilustrações (dados e mapas) a titulo meramente exemplificativo e
não de base legal.
Se trata de una presentación cuyas ilustraciones (datos y mapas) son meros ejemplos sin que
representen base legal.

1st Part - WHITE PAPER Outline
. Challenges ahead
. A vision for the European transport system of 2050
. 1 target (-60% of GHG emissions) and 10 indicative
goals/benchmarks to guide policy action
. How to do it – 4 “i”s and 40 actions
. [Internal Market, Innovation, Infrastructure and International]

não de base legal.

Growing congestion and poorer accessibility
.Fuel costs and congestion levels are expected to rise
significantly by 2030, leading to further divergences in
accessibility

não de base legal.

A tight carbon budget for the transport sector
.Transport accounts for about one
fourth of GHG emissions: 60%
comes from passenger transport,
one quarter is urban, less than one
quarter is inter-continental and over
half is medium-distance

.In October 2009, the European
Council showed support for the
objective of reducing GHG
emissions in the EU by 80 to 95%
by 2050 compared to 1990 levels
Source: PRIMES-TREMOVE and TREMOVE
Source: PRIMES, NTUA (E3MLab)
não de base legal.

 The vision
Freight
• High global maritime
standards
• More efficient hinterland
connections for ports
• Modern vessels and cleaner
fuels for shipping
• Paperless logistics
• Multimodal long-distance freight
corridors
• No barriers to maritime transport
• Cleaner trucks on shorter
distances
• Better interface between long
distance and last-mile
• Freight consolidation centres
and delivery points
• ITS for better logistics
• Low-noise and low-emission
trucks for deliveries
Passengers
• Adequate capacity and improved
overall travel experience
(efficient links between airports
and rail, minimum hassle for
personal security screening…)
• Seamless multimodal travel
(online multimodal info and
ticketing, multimodal hubs…)
• Quality service and enforced
passengers’ rights
• Near-zero casualties for road
• Non-fossil mobility (Clean and
efficient cars; Higher share of
public transport; Alternative
propulsion for urban buses and
taxis; Better infrastructure for
walking and cycling)
Long-distance
travel and
intercontinental
freight
Intercity
travel and
transport
Urban
transport
and
commuting
não de base legal.

 nfrastructure:
• Revision of TEN-T (2011) based on the creation
of a ‘core network’ and on a corridors’
approach. Over € 1.5 trillion investments for
2010-2030.
• A single framework to use coherently money in
TEN-T, cohesion and structural funds.
Conditionality of funding will ensure focus on
EU priorities and adoption of new technologies
(2011)
• Single management structures for rail freight
corridors
• Guidelines for the application of infrastructure
costs to passenger cars (2012). In a second
stage, a framework for the internalisation of
costs to all road vehicles
não de base legal.

PART 2 – TEN-T and the New TEN-T
Guidelines
.PART 2 - TEN-T and the New TEN-T Guidelines
• Comprehensive Network 2050
• CORE Network 2030
não de base legal.

New TEN-T Guidelines
.Problems: TEN-T today remains a patchwork of national networks:
• Cross-border sections are missing, especially for rail and inland waterways, road network is
very advanced.
• Links between the different modes of transport are weak: ports, airports, logistic platforms need
to be well connected to the various modes
• National operational rules and technical systems (interoperability) block the internal transport
market.
.Solutions: from a patchwork to a network
• Realise the missing links (cross-border, bottlenecks)
• Make the network intermodal: link in the nodes that allow exchange between transport modes
• Make the network interoperable and efficient: ERTMS, RIS, ITS, SESAR, etc and operational
rules
• Use the existing infrastructure better
• Make a more binding framework for realising the network
.Guidelines propose: (after 2 years of intense preparations with MS)
• Two layer approach: core network and comprehensive network
• Comprehensive network will cover entire EU, accessibility for all citizens and businesses
• Core network: a selection of the most important parts of the network to be realised as a priority
until 2030
não de base legal.

The new TEN-T Guidelines
. Implement the White Paper Policies (e.g, Maritime Transport + Ports policy)
. Support the Development of a European Mobility Network [Freight and Passengers]
. Structure a Comprehensive TEN-T Network (2050) and a Core Network (2030)
Leading to Full modal integration
. 2014-2020 – implementation via the “Connecting Europe Facility” : 10 Corridors + 3
Horizontal Priorities + Priority segments
• MOS - 3rd horizontal priority
Motorways of the Sea are the Maritime Dimension of the new TEN-T !
(like an underlying 11th Corridor ? Blue corridors ??)

não de base legal.

EU 27 Core Network
to be completed in 2030
não de base legal.

10 Core network Corridors
não de base legal.

MoS 2012 and beyond
.Maritime component of the priority corridors
.Connecting corridors
.Connecting corridors and Core network ports
.Connecting Core network ports
.Connecting those above and the ports of the
comprehensive network
não de base legal.

não de base legal.

Se trata de uma apresentação com ilustrações (dados e mapas) a titulo meramente
exemplificativo e não de base legal.
Se trata de una presentación cuyas ilustraciones (datos y mapas) son meros ejemplos sin
base legal.

This is merely a presentation with illustrations as an example,
without any legal basis.
Se trata de uma apresentação com ilustrações (dados e mapas)
a titulo meramente exemplificativo e não de base legal.
Se trata de una presentación cuyas ilustraciones (datos y
mapas) son meros ejemplos sin que representen base legal.

This is merely a presentation with illustrations as an example, without
any legal basis.
Se trata de uma apresentação com ilustrações (dados e mapas) a titulo
meramente exemplificativo e não de base legal.
Se trata de una presentación cuyas ilustraciones (datos y mapas) son
meros ejemplos sin base legal.

2030 –
a European core network
não de base legal.

não de base legal.

The Motorways of the Sea
. The building block for the Maritime Dimension of TEN-T, covering the whole European
Maritime Space, i.e. the financing framework for Maritime (Ports & Shipping)
. Providing a platform for the development of key activities:
• Ships and Ship operations
• Ports & access to hinterland
• Human Element [training for MoS]
• Organisational systems and procedures
. Leading to Safe, Secure and Sustainable Maritime Operations – instrumental to
European Competitiveness
. Examples: Safety of Navigation, Environmental performance of Ships and Ports (e.g. LNG),Traffic
Management and Navigation Services (e.g. e-maritime), Optimised ship operations, ICT for Ports
and Logistics, year round navigation (e.g. Baltic).

não de base legal.

GOVERNANCE IN THE TEN-T
[1] - Policy Background:
WHITE PAPER
TEN-T Guidelines
FAC Committee + Guidelines
Maritime Policy: Waterb. Sustainable
toolbox,Safety, Ports Policy, Environment, e-maritime, etc
[2] - GOVERNANCE: Commission + MS + EP for each Policy
objectives and technical contents for each Workprogramme
…Follow-up implementation (TEN-T EA): Calls, Contracts
(Decisions) – reporting back to DG MOVE
não de base legal.

PART 3 - CEF
.PART 2 Connecting Europe Facility
CEF : 2014-2020
não de base legal.

2030 –
a European core network
não de base legal.

The Connecting Europe Facility: EU added value of an
integrated instrument
• Europe’s economic future requires smart, sustainable and fully interconnected transport,
energy and digital networks => key for the Europe 2020 Strategy.
• Effective interconnection of networks can only be achieved at the European level,
guaranteeing minimum cost to all citizens.
• CEF aims at supporting infrastructures with a European and Single Market dimension,
targeting EU support on priority networks to be implemented by 2020 where European
action is most warranted.
• CEF aims at building an environment conducive to private investment and develop
instruments that will be attractive vehicles for specialised infrastructure investors.
• CEF seeks to find common solutions for all sectors, wherever possible and practical.
• Smart performance indicators common to CEF aligned on Europe 2020 strategy and 20-
20-20 energy and climate change objectives, as well as specific sectoral objectives and
indicators.
não de base legal.

The Connecting Europe Facility: simplification in line with EU Budget
review
.One single regulation for financing, common to three sectors (transport, energy,
ICT), replacing existing legal bases TEN-T/TEN-E and eTEN.
• Maximum integration and harmonisation to ensure common rules to simplify for
beneficiaries and MS: a single committee, possibility of common annual work programmes
whenever synergies can be found.
• Flexibility: midterm revision of amounts between three sectors based on performance and
absorption of funds.
• Innovative financial instruments (multi-sector) to create a new asset class.
• Coordination with other EU instruments: cohesion policy instruments as well as Horizon
2020 and external instruments.
• Specific provisions to reflect differences between sectors: multi-annual work programmes,
treatment of third countries.
• CEF forms the necessary complement for the Sectoral Policy Guidelines which determine
the priorities and regulatory measures of implementation, and the Communication on the
Financial Instruments.
não de base legal.

Investment needs identified for the European Transport
system
.€1.5 trillion of investment needs by 2030
.TEN-T alone: €500 billion by 2020
.Core Network alone requires €250 billion by
2020
• Estimate based on discussions with MS on their
project portfolio
não de base legal.

Connecting Europe Facility: budget proposed
.€31.7 billion for transport
• (including €10 Billion from Cohesion Fund)
.Connecting Europe Facility does not replace or displace
cohesion policy funding.
• Cohesion Fund will have €24 billion for TEN-T
projects + ERDF available for secondary or
tertiary connectivity
• Coordination with CEF to be ensured through
Common Strategic Framework and partnership
Contracts
não de base legal.

Connecting Europe Facility and TEN-T: eligibility of actions
€31.7 billion for transport through
.Innovative financial instruments: estimate of market take-up:
€2bn
• with an estimate leverage of up to 15 or 20 could generate total
investments of €30bn to €40bn.
.Grant component estimate: €19.7bn
• with an estimated average co-funding rate of 20% could generate
€98.5bn
.+ €10bn earmarked in the Cohesion fund (grants)
• with an estimated average co-funding rate of 85% could generate
€11.5bn
Total amount of investments that could be generated: €140bn to
€150bn.
não de base legal.

The Connecting Europe Facility: eligibility
Financial instruments and procurement:
All actions contributing to projects of common interest, i.e. core and comprehensive
network, including horizontal priorities, and programme support actions (i.e. European
coordinators) are eligible.
Grants: actions contributing to projects of common interest:
• Actions implementing core network (Chapter III of Guidelines), including deployment of
new technologies & innovation (Art 39 of Guidelines)
• Studies in PCI in third countries to link with transport networks of third countries (Art
8(1)(b) and (c) of Guidelines)
• Works for PCI in third countries (Art 8(1)(a) and (d) of Guidelines)
• Traffic managements systems (Art 37 of Guidelines)
• Freight transport services (Art 38 of Guidelines)
• Actions to reduce rail noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock
• Programme support actions
Grant funding for projects with significant user-based revenue sources shall be
primarily available for purposes of project preparation, in particular PPP
assessment.
não de base legal.

.80 – 85 % of available budget
for pre-identified projects
listed in Annex 1
• 3 horizontal
priorities, 10 core
network corridors,
and other
important cross-
border sections
• delegated act
foreseen to amend
list
.15 – 20 % for other projects of
The Connecting Europe Facility: eligibility
não de base legal.

The Connecting Europe Facility: co-funding rates
Types of Projects All Member States
Member States eligible
for Cohesion Fund
(a) Studies (all) 50% 50%
(b)Works on
Rail Cross border 40% 80-85%
Bottleneck 30% 80-85%
Other projects of common interest 20% 80-85%
Inland waterways Cross border 40% 80-85%
Bottleneck 30% 80-85%
Other projects of common interest 20% 80-85%
Inland transport connections to ports and airports (rail and road) 20% 80-85%
Development of ports 20% 80-85%
Development of multi-modal platforms 20% 80-85%
Reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock 20% 20%
Freight transport services 20% 20%
Secure parkings on road core network 20% 20%
Motorways of the sea 20%
Council wants 30%
20%
Council wants 30%
Traffic management systems ERTMS (rail) (Council also wants RIS &
VTMIS)
50% 80-85%
Other modes 20% 80-85%
Cross border road sections none
(Council proposed
10%)
80-85%
Council wants to add new technologies and innovation for all modes of transport 20% 20%
não de base legal.

EU 27 Core Network
to be completed in 2030
não de base legal.

New TEN-T Guidelines
.Problems: TEN-T today remains a patchwork of national networks:
• Cross-border sections are missing, especially for rail and inland waterways, road network is
very advanced.
• Links between the different modes of transport are weak: ports, airports, logistic platforms need
to be well connected to the various modes
• National operational rules and technical systems (interoperability) block the internal transport
market.
.Solutions: from a patchwork to a network
• Realise the missing links (cross-border, bottlenecks)
• Make the network intermodal: link in the nodes that allow exchange between transport modes
• Make the network interoperable and efficient: ERTMS, RIS, ITS, SESAR, etc and operational
rules
• Use the existing infrastructure better
• Make a more binding framework for realising the network
.Guidelines propose: (after 2 years of intense preparations with MS)
• Two layer approach: core network and comprehensive network
• Comprehensive network will cover entire EU, accessibility for all citizens and businesses
• Core network: a selection of the most important parts of the network to be realised as a priority
until 2030
não de base legal.

não de base legal.

Connecting Europe Facility: implementation
.TEN-T Corridors
.E.g. Atlantic Corridor
.Corridor Governance
.Coordinator
.Multimodal nature (& Rail Freight Corridors)
.Environmental friendliness and Efficiency
.Horizontal tools:e.g. interoperable logistic info systems and Universities
.Setting up the inventory of all assets
.Involving All Stakeholders (operators, Infrastructure owners/managers,
Regions, Chambers of Commerce, Shippers, industries,) and Member States
Develop an investment plan = Master Plan for the development of the sector
não de base legal.

Connecting Europe Facility: joint implementation
.Centralised management for grants
• Competitive calls (or beneficiaries identified in the work programme) for the
allocation of funding
• ‘Use it or lose it principle’ to ensure effective implementation
• Economies of scale and synergies between sectors to lower administrative costs
.Partnership with financial intermediaries (like EIB) for financial instruments
.An option to externalise administrative tasks (as part of overall proposal of
Commission on Agencies)
.Implementation of projects (procurement, etc) remains responsibility of
beneficiaries and MS.
.For TEN-T, no big change, building on the successes of its
implementation by the TEN-T EA
não de base legal.

The Connecting Europe Facility: financial instruments
. 2 types of financial instruments:
• Equity (such as Marguerite Fund)
• Risk-sharing instruments to provide loans and/or guarantees (such as LGTT or
Project bonds)
. Estimates of the market take-up of the instruments (adjustment possible)
• €2bn for transport, €1bn for energy, higher for ICT
• Leverage: up to 1:15 to 1:20.
. Implementation by financial partners, such as EIB, in accordance with Financial
Regulation
. No risk for EU budget: no guarantee entered in EU budget (same as LGTT). Residual
risk with the financial partner.
. Combination of innovative financial instruments (e.g. Project bonds) and EU direct
support to optimise the impact of financing
. Possibility for MS (directly or through Structural Funds), other EU funds and/or investors
to top up the CEF financial instruments
não de base legal.
Se trata de una presentación cuyas ilustraciones (datos y mapas) son meros ejemplos sin base legal.

The Connecting Europe Facility: financial instruments and
financial partners
. Working with a financial partner such as EIB:
• Commission guidelines (see previous slides)
• Details of instruments set up in cooperation agreement with financial partner
• Budgetary transfer to the financial partner to be decided every year based on
expected project pipeline and needs.
• Financial partner decides on economic and financial viability of project to be
supported on first come first serve basis, but efforts should be made to ensure
sectoral and gradual geographical diversification
. Project bonds: Lessons learned from LGTT and RSFF
• EIB should be the partner for Project bonds
• Other financial institutions are not excluded
não de base legal.

Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative: A pilot phase in 2012-
2013
. Project bonds to be an integral part of the CEF 2014-2020
. Past experience (especially LGTT) shows time lag for banks and project sponsors to
incorporate complex new ideas into their financing structures
. In the case of project bonds also have to allow investors (pension funds, insurers) time
to analyse and adapt asset allocation
. Pilot phase in order to start this phase now rather than in 2014
. Funded by reallocating up to EUR 200 million from TEN-T, up to EUR 10 million from
TEN-E and up to EUR 20 million from CIP ICT budget lines
. Aim to support 5-10 projects in transport, energy and/or ICT
. Agreement reached, Pilot phase to start this summer
não de base legal.

The Connecting Europe Facility: the €10 billion from Cohesion
Fund (only for transport)
. Reason: difficulties to deliver complex cross-border projects with high EU added value,
especially in rail in Cohesion MS. In order to ensure synchronised investments to give
all MS access to the internal market.
. Mechanism: transfer pro-rata of €10 billion from Cohesion Fund
. Eligibility: only MS eligible to Cohesion Fund
. Co-funding rate: like Cohesion Fund: up to 85% (80% for phasing-out, with possibility
of top-up)
. Implementation: separate competitive calls for projects with benchmark of ‘greatest
possible priority given to national allocations under Cohesion Fund’. Goal remains to
deliver core network in all MS. Core network completion decisive to ensure access to
internal market for all MS.
. Preparation to ensure quality and maturity of projects: support from Commission
services (specific call for proposals under TEN-T programme prior to 2014) as well as
Jaspers to develop adequate project pipeline
não de base legal.

PART 4 Motorways of the Sea
.(IV) Motorways of the Seas – MoS:
• ongoing,
• Call 2012 &
• future
não de base legal.

MoS 2012 and beyond
.Maritime component of the priority corridors:
• Connecting corridors
• Connecting corridors and Core network ports
• Connecting Core network ports
• Connecting those above and the ports of the
comprehensive network
.Development of Maritime Infrastructure, i.e.:
• Safety and Protection of the Environment at
Sea and Training
• Port infrastructure (inc. conn. to hinterland)
não de base legal.

MoS 2012 and beyond (2)
.Guidelines
.CEF – 3rd Horizontal Priority (with Airports +
Core Ports)
.Funding
• Proposal EC – 20%
• Council – 30%
• EP – expected to go higher
não de base legal.

MoS ONGOING Projects - 2012
.End 2011- 19 MoS Projects so far app. 1.5 B€
.ECAS short term actions and LNG deployment
.Single Window (e-maritime e-customs)
.Port and city reconciliation (Gothenburg/Aarhus)
.Port cooperation (NAPA – Adriatic)
.Efficient Sea Lanes (Gdinya/Karlskrona +
Trelleborg /Rostock) - Blue-Green corridors…
.Training (tackling global problems with local knowledge)
não de base legal.


This is merely a
presentation with
illustrations as an example,
without any legal basis.
Se trata de uma
apresentação com
ilustrações (dados e
mapas) a titulo meramente
exemplificativo e não de
base legal.
Se trata de una
presentación cuyas
ilustraciones (datos y
mapas) son meros
ejemplos sin que


Thisismerelyapresentationwithillustrationsasanexample,
withoutanylegalbasis.
Setratadeumaapresentaçãocomilustrações(dadose
mapas)atitulomeramenteexemplificativoenãodebaselegal.
Setratadeunapresentacióncuyasilustraciones(datosy
mapas)sonmerosejemplossinbaselegal.


This is merely a presentation with illustrations as an
example, without any legal basis.
Se trata de uma apresentação com ilustrações
(dados e mapas) a titulo meramente exemplificativo e
não de base legal.
Se trata de una presentación cuyas ilustraciones
(datos y mapas) son meros ejemplos sin que

TEN-T Multi-Annual Programme 2012
MoS call - SCOPE
.General Sustainability and Safety
.Contribute to “Climate Change” solutions
.Strengthen Cohesion
.Improve existing or establish new maritime links
.Improve Maritime Transport integration in the global logistic chain
.Improve transhipment and hinterland connections in Ports
.Multimodal connections – priority for the integration of Inland
Navigation and Rail
.Fostering the deployment of new technologies and systems
.Call 2011 – Results 7 Projects approved for app 50 M€ EC
contribution (LNG (2), Scrubbers, Training, Cold Ironing, Maritime
Connection Atlantic + maritime connection Adriatic)
não de base legal.

FUTURE (1)
.There will be
No Corridors
Without Single
Windows.
WHERE ?
PORTS
não de base legal.

MoS ONGOING Projects – 2012
SINGLE WINDOW
.MIELE – IT Led (IT+ PT+ SP + DE + CY)
.Mos4Mos: SP led (SP+ IT+ GR + SL)
.Baltic Sea Hub & Spoke: DK led (DK+SE+ES)
.ITS Adriatic Multi-port Gateway: IT led (IT+SL+ CR)
.MoS24: IT led (IT, FR+ MT, BE, SW)
.[Implementation of Directive 65 – A/A]
.A/B + B/B common sense & consistent solutions
não de base legal.

FUTURE (1)
.There will be
SECAs
With different
Fuels or Techno
logies
Nox + Sox
Particulates
WHERE ?
PORTS
SHIPS
não de base legal.

MoS ONGOING Projects – 2012
SECA
.ECAS: LNG deployment : Pilot Project – DK Led
(retrofitting vessels, standards)
.ECAS (2) : LNG Deployment : Port Deployment
Masterplan – Baltic Sea Ports Organisation
.ECAS: Use of Scrubbers (Trelleborg/Rostock with
TT Lines) – and facilities in ports
.Framework for investment and critical mass for
change
.COSTA – addressing use of LNG (ATL/MED/BS)
não de base legal.

CEF
TEN-T Corridors
.With Core Ports
não de base legal.

.LNG deployment:
• Infrastructure
• Standards
• Pilot tests for shore based instalations
• bunkering and ship equipment)
• Master plan for investment and deployment, etc
.SINGLE WINDOW
• Reporting Directive
• Standards
• Institutional requirements
• Industrial requirements
.WHO will do WHAT , WHEN and for HOW MUCH
não de base legal.

.LNG deployment:
• Policy issues: IMO (Marpol Annex 6) + EU Sox
Directive
• Related:
• Waterborne Sustainable Toolbox
• Clean Power Directive
.SINGLE WINDOW
• Reporting Directive 65
• Standards : ITS / WCustomsO /WTradeO
• Industrial requirements
.WHO will do WHAT , WHEN and for HOW MUCH
não de base legal.

não de base legal.

SECA AREA
não de base legal.

LNG Operations
Re-Fuelling Operations
não de base legal.

TEN-T CEF
Corridors
.With Core ports
não de base legal.

TEN-T - Multi-Annual Programme 2012
MoS call 2012 - WHEN & how MUCH !!
.Exploiting synergies:
• Other funding Mechanisms: EIB, MEDA, Accession, Marco
Polo**
• HELPDESK (TEN-TEA + ), Commission Services – to help
potential applicants (many preconceived ideas…)
• Clustering meetings: MED (Genoa) + Baltic (Aarhus) +
general meeting (Madrid) + Gothenburg + Cyprus
 Funding 2012: Min 50 - 100 M€ ** - Call opening in Spring
2013
[indicative]
não de base legal.

não de base legal.

| 65Roadmap to a Single European Transport AreaContainer routes in the
Baltic Sea
não de base legal.

não de base legal.

Thank you for your attention!

TEN-T Corridors & Challenges for Motorways of the Sea – funding and support framework into 2020

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (8)

Similar to TEN-T Corridors & Challenges for Motorways of the Sea – funding and support framework into 2020

Similar to TEN-T Corridors & Challenges for Motorways of the Sea – funding and support framework into 2020 (20)

More from Cláudio Carneiro

More from Cláudio Carneiro (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

TEN-T Corridors & Challenges for Motorways of the Sea – funding and support framework into 2020