TEAM D WIRELESS ELECTRICITY OUTLINETeam Course Project Wi.docx

TEAM D: WIRELESS ELECTRICITY OUTLINE
Team Course Project
Wireless Electricity Outline
Team D
Muraine, Karen
Narabal, Kristopher
Oke, Karen
Pick, Wanda
Rinkus, Laura
Ryder, Christopher
Rzodkiewicz, Karolina
DeVry University
LAS 432: Tech, Society, and Culture
Professor Scott Maxon
May 10, 2015
Outline
I. Introduction – Karen Muraine
a. Topic Sentence
Wireless electricity brings many advantages to a world that has
been dependent upon utilizing wires and cables to transport
energy.
b. Thesis Statement
Wireless energy transmission will continue to have a significant
impact on our daily lives ranging from political, economic,
psychological, sociological, cultural, artistic, environmental,
and ethical perspectives.
II. Description of Wireless Electricity Technology -
Karen Muraine
a. Science that drove wireless technology

b. Applications of wireless technology
III. History – Karolina Rzodkiewicz
a. The idea and Techniques
b. Development and Challenges
IV. Political Causes and Legal Effects – Karen Oke
a. Policy and Scalability: Short Distance Transmission
b. Policy and Scalability: Long Distance Transmission
V. Economic Issues – Christopher Ryder
a. Financial Impact on U.S. Economy
b. Corporate Growth and Expansion
c. Chart and Graph Analysis
VI. Psychological Considerations – Wanda Pick
a. Psychological Effects from Wireless Technology
b. Maslow and Piaget’s Theory’s
c. Psychology Needs Met by Wireless Electricity
VII. Sociological Effects – Wanda Pick
a. Changes to Society Due to Wireless Electricity
b. Sociological Factors that Led to Technology
Development
c. Those Who Benefit and Harmed by the Technology
VIII. Cultural Considerations – Kristopher Narabal
a. Wireless electricity in Asia
b. Wireless uses and marketing in America
IX. Artistic Links – Kristopher Narabal
a. Wireless Electricity in Movies and Music
b. Future artistic applications
X. Environmental Effects – Karolina Rzodkiewicz

a. Ethics
b. Health and Safety
c. Pollution and Green Living
XI. Moral and Ethical Considerations – Laura Rinkus
a. Quality of life, rights, theft, control, and harm to
others
b. Privacy, confidentiality, accountability, authority,
and responsibility
XII. Conclusion – Karen Oke
a. Analytical Summary
b. Thesis Reworded
c. Concluding Statement

LAS 432 Course Capstone Project
[Project Title]
[Course Number and Section Number]
(LAS 432 - _ _ )
[The Section Number can be located in the Email tab of the
shell, just before the “Subject Line”. The 432 is your Course
Number. Utilize the final two digits in that row of numbers as
your Section Number, and place them above in the two
underlined spaces following “LAS – “. Delete these red
instructional items in brackets before submission.]
Professor’s Name
Date of Submission
LAS 432 Course Capstone Project
[Project Title]

Team Letter
Team Leader:
Name - D#
Team Members:
Team Member Name - D#
Running head: RESOURCE REVIEW: Wireless Electricity
Resource Review: Wireless Electricity
Wanda Pick
DeVry University

LAS432
Professor Maxon
May 17, 2015
WIRELESS ELECTRICITY
1
Resource Review: Wireless Electricity
Hicks, B. (2014). Investing in Wireless Charging: The Next Big
Thing in Wireless. Comment by ChillLaptop: Sentence case

Online http://www.wealthdaily.com/articles/investing-in-
wireless-charging/5062 Comment by ChillLaptop: .com’s are
not scholarly.
This article covers interlocking electromagnetic fields to
generate a current within the handheld device itself, inductive
chargers already available on the market today, such as the
Energizer Duel Inductive Charger, allow for the charging of
multiple devices at the same time. Not only do they constantly
get lost or broken, but their necessity is exploited by the
underhanded product development departments of just about
every consumer technology manufacturer, which insist on
changing ports and interfaces as often as possible so that for
every new phone, the purchase of a whole new set of home and
car chargers is also necessary. This article was written by an
investment director for the income and dividendwriting about
the economy, investments and politics.
Collins, H. (2014). How Will Wireless Electricity Affect the
Public and Private Sectors?
Online http://www.govtech.com/products/How-Will-Wireless-
Electricity-Affect-the-Public-and-Private-Sectors.html
Comment by ChillLaptop: .com’s are not scholarly.
This article discusses wireless electricity has the potential to
change the way the world lives and works. And if it takes off,
the technology, which allows people to charge appliances and
mobile devices without a cord, has massive societal
implications. Speaks about doctors and companies that develop
these things can put these devices in people, and they can be
charged when they sleep or when they sit in a chair. Improving
the quality of life and expand lifespan and hopefully also reduce
the cost of medical care. The writer writes for government

technology and emergency magazines.
2
Ferris, D. (2012). How Wireless Charging Will Make Life
Simpler (and Greener).
Online
http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidferris/2012/07/24/how-
wireless-charging-will-make-life-simpler-and-greener/
Comment by ChillLaptop: .com’s are not scholarly.
This article covers wireless power could reduce demand for
power cables while making gadgets more durable, eliminate the
need for throwaway batteries, and perhaps even accelerate the
adoption of electric cars. Watchers of this embryonic market
think it’s going to be huge. The writer writes for the
intersection of energy, climate and business that will have
choices on our lives and our children’s.
Kintner-Meyer, M., and Brambley, M.R. (2002). Pros and Cons
of Wireless.
Online www.ashrae.org
Here’sthe additional link
https://www.google.com/#q=pros+and+cons+of+wireless+electr
icity
This Article covers for any new technology to penetrate the
marketplace, it either must be significantly less expensive than
the existing technology, or it must have additional features
that provide a competitive advantage and justify the same cost
as the technology to be replaced.
The writers are researchers at the Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory all with PHD on the

new technology in the marketplace today.
U.S. Department of Energy. (2014). Five Things You Didn't
Know About the Potential for
Wireless Vehicle Charging.
Online http://www.energy.gov/articles/five-things-you-didn-t-
know-about-potential-wireless-vehicle-charging
This article covers five things you may have not known about
wireless charging for electric vehicles Also known as inductive
charging or wireless power transfer, wireless charging involves
transferring power from the electric grid to a PEV battery
without the use of wires, cords or plugs. It requires only a
ground-based transmitting coil, or charging pad, and appropriate
grid-side power electronics to transfer energy to a vehicle with
a corresponding
3
receiving coil installed. The writer a Communications
Specialist, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Brecher, A., and Arthur, D. (2014). Review and Evaluation of
Wireless Power Transfer (WPT)
forelectric Transit Applications.
Online
http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/FTA_Report_No._0060.pdf
This report provides a status review of emerging and existing
Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) technologies applicable to
electric bus (EB) and rail transit. WPT technology options
discussed, especially the most widely used subset of WPT
known as Inductive Power Transfer (IPT), enable rapid in-
station or opportunity (boost) dynamic recharging of electric

bus batteries for range extension. In addition, WPT technology
offers the promise of economic benefits, greater convenience,
safety benefits, and environmental sustainability benefits. This
article was prepared by Dr. Aviva Brecher and Mr. David
Arthur, P.E. U. S. Department of Transportation
Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
Sage, C., and Carpenter, D.O. (2009). Public health implications
of wireless technologies.
Pathophysiology 603:14. http://emfsafetynetwork.org/wp-
content/uploads/2009/10/sage.pdf
Global exposures to emerging wireless technologies from
applications including mobile phones, cordless phones, DECT
phones, WI-FI, WLAN,WiMAX, wireless internet, baby
monitors, and others may present serious public health
consequences. Evidence supporting a public health risk is
documented in the BioInitiative Report. New, biologically based
public exposure standards for chronic exposure to low-intensity
exposures are warranted. Existing safety standards are obsolete
4
because they are based solely on thermal effects from acute
exposures. The rapidly expanding development of newwireless
technologies and the long latency for the development of such
serious diseases as brain cancers means that failure to take
immediate action to reduce risks may result in an epidemic of
potentially fatal diseases in the future. Regardless of
whether or not the associations are causal, the strengths of the
associations are sufficiently strong that in the opinion of the
authors, taking action to reduce exposures is imperative,
especially for the fetus and children. This article was written by
two authors who are in Pathphysiology.

IOP Institution of Physics. (n.d.). Cutting the cord - Wireless
electricity.
Online http://www.physics.org/featuredetail.asp?id=40
This article covers first came cordless phones, then wireless
internet. The next step to making our lives truly mobile is
getting rid of the tangles of power cables lurking in all our
homes. A team from MIT lead by Dr Marin SoljaA had bigger
ideas for it. This article is from physics.org I could not find the
author from this site just the organization itself.
Huitt, W. (2007). Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Educational
Psychology Interactive.
Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Online
http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/regsys/maslow.html
This article covers Maslow recognized that not all personalities
followed his proposed hierarchy. While a variety of personality
dimensions might be considered as related to motivational
needs, one of the most often cited is that of introversion and
extroversion. Reorganizing Maslow's
5
hierarchy based on the work of Alderfer and considering the
introversion/extraversion dimension of personality results in
three levels, each with an introverted and extroverted
component. This organization suggests there may be two aspects
of each level that differentiate how people relate
to each set of needs with different personalities relating more to
one dimension than the other. This article/text (Educational
Psychology Interactive) is written by many different authors.

Dickerson, K. (2014). Wireless Electricity? How the Tesla Coil
Works.
Online http://www.livescience.com/46745-how-tesla-coil-
works.html Comment by ChillLaptop: .com’s are not
scholarly.
This article covers Tesla developed the coil in 1891, before
conventional iron core transformers were used to power things
like lighting systems and telephone circuits. These conventional
transformers can not withstand the high frequency and high
voltage that the looser coils in Tesla's invention can tolerate.
This article was written by Kelly Dickerson, Staff Writer for
live science.
Team Project – Week 2
Resource Review
Graded element Points
Comments
Minimum of 5 scholarly resources
25/25
Check the DeVry library for scholarly articles
Correct use of APA formatting
20/25
Clearly indicates how the resources support research in this
section
25/25
Spelling and grammar

15/15
Please Note: I reserve the right to deduct points from individual
team members for lack of participation, late participation,
and/or quality of work that does not meet expectations. It is
important to adhere to the deadlines your team agrees upon. If
you submit after the time the team agrees upon, you may lose
points or receive a zero.
Total Grade Points 85/90
Team Project Week 1
Topic and Outline
Group Grade
Team Name/Topic:
Group Members’ Names:
Includes a clearly stated thesis statement
/20
Outline has sufficient detail with at least 2 levels of headings.
All sections have been included and assigned.

/20
/10
Total Grade Points /50
Team Project – Week 2
Resource Review
Individual Grade
Student Name:
Graded element Points
Comments
Minimum of 5 scholarly resources
/25
Correct use of APA formatting
/25
Clearly indicates how the resources support research in this
section

/25
/15
Total Grade Points /90
HUMN 432 Paper
INDIVIDUAL GRADING SHEET
STUDENT NAME:
/200
Your contribution to the paper will be evaluated according to
the complexity of the material, the thoroughness of your
research, the quality of the analysis and synthesis of other
course material, and your writing skills. I will look at how well
your team covered off on all requirements and how your section
fits into the overall project.
ELEMENT TO BE ASSESSED IN EACH SECTION
MARK
COMMENTS
Organization of Material -

central theme, arrangement and use of evidence and quotes,
logic
/40
Examination of Topic -
comprehensiveness, connections, explanation of context/impact
/40
Synthesis of material with course concepts and course readings
(specific authors included) /quality of research
/40
Bibliography and notes
/20
Format, spelling grammar
/30
Completeness of overall report, all topics covered, fit with
overall report
(Group mark)
/30

LAS432 Final Project
Checklist of Elements to be Covered
Just a working checklist, not an outline!
Element
Research Paper
Yes/No/Partially
Presentation
Yes/No/Partially
Description of the technology and the associated science
Historical development and context, factors that drove the
technology
Economic issues
Political/legal issues
Social/psychological

Cultural/artistic/film/literature
Moral/ethical
Environmental issues
Humn 432 Team Presentation Grade
Goal
Excellent
Very Good
Good But Needs Improvement
Does Not Meet Standards
Points
Instructor Comments
Team Work
25 points
The group functioned exceptionally well. All members listened
to, shared with and supported the efforts of each other. The
group (all members) was always on task! (21-25)
The group functioned very well. Most members listened to,
shared with and supported the efforts of others. The group (all
members) was almost always on task! (14-20)

The group functioned fairly well but was dominated by one or
two members and/or members were absent. (8-13)
Some members of the group were often off task AND/OR were
overtly disrespectful to others in the group AND/OR were
disregarded by other group members. (0-7)
Graphics
10 points
Graphics included original material and were clearly related to
the material being presented. (8-10)
Graphics were clearly related to the material being presented,
but only some were original. (6-7)
Graphics included some original material but were only
somewhat related to the material being presented. (4-5)
Graphics were not original and not related to the material being
presented. Or there were no graphics. (0-3)
Oral Expression
25 points
Spoke clearly and distinctly all of the time and mispronounced
no words. (21-25)
Spoke clearly and distinctly most of the time but sometimes
mispronounced words. (14-20)
Spoke clearly and distinctly some of the time but often
mispronounced words. (8-13)
Did NOT speak clearly and distinctly most of the time AND/OR
consistently mispronounced words. (0-7)
Research
90 points
Group researched the subject and integrated ALL required
elements from their research into their presentation. (77-90)
Group researched the subject and integrated all but one required

element from their research into their presentation. (68-76)
Group researched the subject but only integrated two or three
elements from their research into their presentation. (54-67)
Very little content presented. Either no research was done or it
was not clear that the group used it in the presentation. (0-53)
TOTAL PTS:
/150
LAS432
Team Project Guidelines
Objective
This capstone course concludes with a research Team Project
that starts during the first week and continues throughout the
duration of the class. It culminates with the submission of a
formal team report and an oral presentation by each team during
Week 7, and Peer Reviews in Week 8.
Each team will identify and explore an emerging technology.
This will be a technology that may already exist, but is drawing
attention because of new applications, anticipated impacts or
potential controversies. Examples could include:
· nanotechnology in manufacturing,
· genetically modified organisms,
· remote/robotic surgery, or
· wireless electricity.

The team will explore the technical, social, cultural, moral and
ethical issues presented by the technology.
Guidelines:
Teams
All teams will be assigned at the start of the first week. The
first deliverable is due on the Sunday of Week 1, so students
must get organized and into the project immediately. Each team
will select a Team Leader, who will be responsible for the
coordination of the research and the submission of assignments.
Team members will remain on the assigned team throughout the
duration of the class (in the project world, project managers
seldom have the opportunity to select their own team
members!). It is highly recommended that each team develop its
own Team Contract to clearly define expectations, strategies,
and timelines.
Emphasis is placed on both individual contributions and the
final product of teams. You will communicate with your team
through team meetings (online) and team discussion threads.
Team members who fail to participate in an assignment will not
get points for that assignment.
With those parts of the Team Project where a group grade will
be assigned, all team members must submit a copy of the team’s
work. When an assignment is completed, the Team Leader will
distribute the finished product to all team members, and each
team member must submit this copy to the Dropbox,
The Task
The primary focus of the team is to research and assess the
issues associated with a specific emerging technology. The team
will produce a formal research paper in APA format, with each
team member contributing 10 pages of text. The paper will
provide the basis for a 20-minute team presentation.
The following Required Elements must be researched and
included in the final project. What follows is a list only, and is
in no way an outline:
· A brief description of the technology and an explanation of the
associated science

· The historical development and context of the technology
· Political and legal influences
· Economic questions and considerations
· Psychological considerations and sociological effects
· The technology in its cultural context, media influence
· Implications for the environment
· Moral and ethical implications
To properly analyze the various elements of the project,
research will cut across disciplines and include academic,
scientific and industry sources. Complete project guidelines and
suggestions can be found in DocSharing.
Deliverables
All students submit the project individually, not just the Team
Leader. With respect to graded group work the Team Leader
must distribute the finished project to the team so that each
member may submit it individually to the dropbox. With respect
to individually graded segments of the project, each team
member is responsible for compiling his/her own assignment
and submitting it to the dropbox.
Rubrics: All rubrics for the Team Project can be found in
DocSharing.
Week 1:Research Topic and Outline (possible 50 points, group
grade)
Each team will select a topic for research and a Team Leader.
Using the list of required elements for the project, each member
of the team will take responsibility for researching specific
aspects of the technology. The team will then produce a detailed
outline for the project, noting each team member’s research
sections. Please note, the list of required elements is just that –
a list – and does not constitute an outline.
Thesis Statement:
Each outline assignment should begin with a thesis statement.
This thesis sentence presents the central idea of the paper. It
must always be a complete, grammatical sentence, specific and

brief, which expresses the point of view you are taking towards
the subject. (You will need to collaborate with your group on
the perspective of the thesis.) This thesis statement will be
included in the introduction of your final report and the opening
of your presentation.
Detailed Outline:
In the outline, each heading and subheading is given in single
words or brief phrases. To subdivide a heading into
subheadings, there must be at least two subsections. Use
numbers and letters to indicate the level of your headings, for
example:
I. Description of the Technology
a. Science that drove the technology
b. Applications of the technology
II. History of the Technology
a. A brief timeline
b. An analysis of social factors that drove the technology
Be consistent with your choice of phrases, making sure they are
grammatically parallel (where possible).
Each member of the team is to take responsibility for sections
of this report. Indicate the assigned sections by placing the
student’s name next to each section. When assigning the
research try and match up personal strengths or interests. Once
again, the required elements are:
· A brief description of the technology and an explanation of the
associated science
· The historical development and context of the technology
· Political and legal influences
· Economic questions and considerations
· Psychological considerations and sociological effects
· The technology in its cultural context, media influence
· Implications for the environment
· Moral and ethical implications
The finished assignment should be 2 – 3 pages in length, not
counting the title page. Although this assignment will result in a
group grade, each person is required to submit a copy to the

dropbox by the due date. The Team Leader will distribute the
finished product to each team member, whereupon each team
member will submit the same assignment to the dropbox.
Making the Connections for Your Team Research Project
If you have the following section, you might want to explore the
connections that comprise that discipline:
Pure Sciences: How does this technology work? Try to avoid the
“How Things Work” website as your resource for this portion of
the paper. Instead cite real scientists and fundamental scientific
laws (e.g. laws of gravitation, Boyle’s law, laws of
thermodynamics, etc.) underpinning the technology. Cite
technical manuals, using scientific explanations, but work to
express the scientific concepts in lay terms. Use physics,
chemistry, biosciences, mathematics, etc. Try to sound “nerdy”
but clear. If you need to provide a glossary at the end of your
paper, that’s okay.
History: Trace the major events along the path to where we are
today with the technology. You have to include a timeline as
part of your discussion or in the Appendix. You also have to
discuss in detail the most recent developments while trying to
give a macro perspective. What happened sequentially,
chronologically, and what led to the innovations that we see
today? Who were the major players? What issues presented
themselves as obstacles, and what were opportunities that
advanced the technology? What factors (economic, scientific,
etc) drove the technology. Tell us the story of how “blank”
came to be.
Political Causes/Effects: Look at government policy,
government intervention, government involvement (support or
lack of support, funding), both nationally and internationally.
Consider Congress, the President, the Supreme Court

(decisions), the rate of change, liberalism, conservatism,
legislation, litigation, etc. What political factors are at work in
the progression or regression of the technology (e.g. lobbyists,
special interest groups, partisan views, vocal advocates or
spokespersons)? For example: The Americans with Disabilities
Act was designed to prevent discrimination and encourage
accessibility to public facilities; it impacted architects,
companies, organizations and persons with disabilities through
the installation of ramps (wider doors, lower knobs/handles,
larger restroom stalls), the use of assistive devices in schools
and in the workplace, hiring practices and lawsuits against
employers, etc.
Economic Issues: Consider production, consumption, costs,
variables of supply-demand, corporations, private enterprise,
impact on the nation’s economy (employment, displacement,
outsourcing). Are certain industries impacted more than others?
Look up financial projections—expectations for growth, startup
companies, the stock exchange, etc.—anything related to
business and the U.S. and global economy. Who are the chief
players in the business environment, and what is their role?
How much has been invested in research and development? How
will the price fluctuate? What economic trends are to be
observed? Who will make money from the technology? Who is
funding the research and development? Who controls the purse
strings, and why? Look at foundations and charitable
organizations, the outcomes and the nature of consumers. Be
sure to use charts and tables and quantitative data in this
section. Tables, figures, and data and statistics must be current,
valid and used appropriately.
Psychological Effects: How has this technology been received,
accepted, rejected? Why? Is it feared or favored? What is the
attitude toward change? How are the developers trying to “sell”
the technology to the general public? Look at attitudes, feelings

(emotions), behaviors, personality, and the ways humans change
as a result of this technology. What is being thought and why?
Is the human mind impacted? How? Are interactions between
people changing as a result? Who is included or excluded and
why? Use Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, Piaget or some other
theorist. What psychological needs are met by the technology
(e.g., cell phones once granted status and now promote a sense
of belonging or connectedness) or created by the technology?
Consumerism?
Sociological Effects: Look at groups and organizations that
have arisen and prospered because of this technology. Are these
groups supportive or antagonist, and why? (An example is
genetically modified foods [GMOs] and the backlash against the
Monsanto corporation. Another is cochlear implants which
allow the deaf to hear, yet reduce the deaf population that calls
itself a community.) How does the technology change society,
or how does society change in response to the technology? What
factors in society led to the development in the first place?
What do class, gender roles, race, norms, etc. mean in this
context? Who will benefit from the technology, and who might
be harmed (this might also belong in ethics/morals section)? For
example, prosthetics enable people to participate more fully and
actively in society (some persons are competing in triatholons
and marathons), and the “war” has brought about the need for
advances in prosthetic technology as casualties with missing
limbs return home to the United States. Look at the workplace,
new companies and/or jobs created, jobs lost (or save this for
economics?). Look at roles—subgroups, people’s interpersonal
and intrapersonal relationships. Consider crime, healthcare,
schools. Surveillance cameras, for example, have recently been
installed inNew York City, and the result has been a decrease in
the amount of crime, purse-snatching, pickpocketing, etc. Yet
some fear the “big brother” effect of always being watched and
tracked and concerns over “Who will guard the guards?”

Cultural Considerations: This is a really important section.
Consider the elements that comprise the culture and subcultures.
Compare the United States use of the technology with that of
other nations around the world. What is about Americans that
brings about innovation, or has America declined in terms of
technical innovation, scientific research and development? Look
at advertising for the technology, the use of celebrities or stars
or heroes, the applications (e.g. sports and nanotechnology) and
the values represented by the culture. What has priority and
why? An example: IBM was spelled out in xenon atoms. Why
were these letters chosen instead of something else?
What new words have been added to our vocabulary from this
technology? “Horseless carriage” was used long before the term
“automobile.” “Wireless” preceded Wi-Fi, and webcasting
preceded podcasting. “Broadcast” was a term adapted from
agriculture long before it was used for radio and television.
Artistic Links: How do musicians and artists react to the
technology or use the technology or incorporate the technology
in their artistic productions? For example, fiber optic lighting
has been used on the stage and in parades (Disney) for
costuming. The drama term “In the limelight,” for example, was
derived from a lens/lighting system used in lighthouses. Look at
literature—perhaps science fiction or fantasy stories—that
predate the technology (Jules Verne, for example, wrote about
submarines before they were actually invented and used—
though Leonardo da Vinci had sketched the idea centuries
before Verne). Are there any songs, short stories, poems, plays,
TV shows, or films that directly make reference to the
technology? Are there any “related” literary works that apply?
Is the artifact in a museum or will it be? Why? How does the
technology relate to concepts of beauty and novelty and human
creativity? How can people express their humanity through this
technology? An example: scientists experimenting with nano
made a “nano guitar” that actually played a tune, though it was
subthreshold human hearing.

Environmental Effects: Consider such things as dangers to
humans, the depletion of resources, air and water pollution,
discovery before inventions, impact on wildlife and humans
(health and safety), long-term and short-term effects, waste
disposal, aesthetic considerations (how the technology changes
the landscape). Look also at the positive effects (savings of raw
materials or fossil fuels, low environmental impact,
enhancement to the environment). For example, some thought
the Alaskan Pipeline would impact the caribou population and
its ability to migrate; the scientists discovered that the
population actually increased and was healthier because they
had “shade” from the above-the-ground pipe, fewer biting flies,
and less physically stressed females.
Other negative examples: the spotted owl and deforestation in
Washington State; the snail darter and the dam, endangered
species and loss of habitats, extinction, over-mining,
overproduction, pollution of ground water, landfills, toxic
wastes, stripping the soil of nutrients, over fishing, over
hunting, over harvesting.
Moral and Ethical Considerations: Consider quality of life,
human rights, codes of ethics, privacy, accountability, corporate
responsibility government responsibility, individual
responsibility (e.g., ways of dying and rights of dying). What
ethical values are expressed implicitly or explicitly by this
technology? Pride (being the first-to-get-to-the moon kind of
thing)? Greed? Power? Fraud? Theft? Deception? Lies? Whose
rights are violated? Whose rights are honored? Consumer
rights? The rights of the general public? Freedom? Authority?
Control? What are the major moral concerns associated with the
creation and adoption of this technology? Remember the e-
Waste example in the reading I gave you—the disposal of
dangerous toxins in “poorer” countries, the not-in-my-backyard
phenomenon. What do religious groups have to say (this group
thing may fit better in the sociology section)? For example,

contraceptives generally prevent pregnancy but for some this
technology violates what they call “natural law” and their
religious belief in God’s command to “be fruitful and multiply.”
Look at corporate code of ethics, professional codes of ethics
(IEEE, etc.) available through websites such as Illinois Institute
of Technology’s and Case Western Reserve University’s
(compilation) or ethicsonline.org. Look at the companies
developing the technology and check out their “codes of ethics”
to determine whether the technology they are developing is in
keeping with their mission and values. Who is responsible if
something goes wrong or if critical information is withheld
from the public? Example: asbestos and cigarettes
Apply ethical theory on your own—utilitarianism, act
utilitarianism, rule utilitarianism, Kant’s categorical imperative,
ethic of care, deontology, teleology, ethical egoism, absolutism,
Fletcher’s situation ethics, ethical relativism, etc. Consider an
encyclopedia of ethics for terms and applicable concepts. Check
out the reading in our textbook on morality and technology.
Week 2: Resource Review (90 possible points, individual
grade)
Each member of the team will assemble at least 5 scholarly,
academic references that will be used to write the paper (refer
to Week 1’s tutorial on Scholarly References). Each student will
list his/her references using APA format, and provide a brief
explanation of each resource indicating how that resource will
be used. The focus should be upon the student’s specific
research assignment. An approximate length of this
bibliography is between 2 - 3 pages.
An example reference:
Brenner, Joel (2011). America the Vulnerable: Inside the New
Threat Matrix of Digital Espionage, Crime, and Warfare. New
York: The Penguin Press
In my section of the report, I will be researching security issues

associated with collaborative online tools. Brenner’s book
explores the events surrounding the WikiLeaks scandal and the
issues associated with security. He also examines the legal
challenges that the incident presented. This material could be
used by my team in another section of the report. He makes
some recommendations that we will consider for our conclusion.
General reference works such as encyclopedias, dictionaries,
wikipedia, howstuffworks.com will not be considered as sources
meeting this requirement. The list could include books, journal
articles, industry reports, authoritative web sites,
manufacturers’ sites or sites from research groups. Remember,
all quotations, paraphrased material, images, graphics and
statistics must be referenced in your report, so make note of all
sources while compiling your research!
Textbook Readings:
It is expected that students will bring into their report concepts
and ideas from their weekly assigned textbook readings. Part of
your grade is determined by your ability to synthesize these
concepts with your other research. Consequently, these authors
must be properly cited and the articles included in your final
bibliography.
Each student will submit his/her assignment to the dropbox by
the due date, and provide a copy to the Team Leader.
Week 6: Submit Rough Draft to TurnItIn (no points, but
required)
Each Team Leader will submit a single team paper to TurnItIn
this week, leaving enough time for instructor review and team
corrections. This is mandatory, as no papers will be accepted
without having been submitted to TurnItIn. After the instructor
reviews the paper through TurnItIn, general comments and
suggestions for the paper will be directed back to the team.
Week 7: Final Draft of the Paper (200 possible points,

individual grade)
All written sections will be compiled into one, cohesive team
paper. All students should review the paper to ensure that the
transitions are smooth, that the sections fit together, and that
the bibliographies are compiled correctly.
The paper should conclude with recommendations for further
research or possible solutions that could be evaluated. A
complete list of references, in APA format, should follow along
with any Appendices.
· Title Page (not included in page count)
· Table of Contents – indicating student sections (not included
in page count)
· Abstract - 200-word summary of the entire paper; it is not a
restatement of the introduction (not included in page count)
· Report
· Introduction that provides background information, establishes
the context and significance of the issues and the technology
(your thesis statement) and generally orients your reader to the
entire project. It should outline the scope of the investigation,
and comment on any challenges the team faced with respect to
research sources.
· Report sections, organized using at least level-1 and level-2
headings.
· Proper documentation throughout the report using APA style.
(Each member is responsible for documenting properly, and
undocumented or poorly cited material will count as
plagiarism—a failing grade for the paper.)
· Appropriate visuals/graphic aids in the document that are
discussed in the body of the report and support the thesis (e.g.,
a table, graph, chart, illustration, photograph, diagram, map,
etc.); mathematical or statistical data is appropriately used to
support conclusions. All visuals/graphic aids also need to be
properly documented.
· Conclusion that effectively synthesizes the sections of the
report. It should summarize key issues. Included in this section
should be Recommendations for Further Research, following up

on any questions that were uncovered during your research or
suggestions for groups/events to follow.
· Bibliography and appendix (not included in the page count but
significant in showing you “found” relevant stuff that would not
fit into the body of the text—brochures, charts, handouts,
samples of materials or products, or team process reports, etc.).
Wise groups begin the bibliography early and start gathering
related materials for the Appendix.
All teams must plan to leave enough time for peer review, to
check transitions and write an effective conclusion.
Remember, final papers must be submitted to TurnItIt before
submitting to the dropbox. Papers that have not been submitted
to TurnItIn will not be accepted.
Although this assignment will result in one cohesive team
paper, each person is required to submit a copy to the dropbox
by the due date. The Team Leader will distribute the finished
product to each team member, whereupon each team member
will submit the same assignment to the dropbox.
Team Oral Presentations (150 possible points, group grade)
Each team will conduct a live team presentation with all
classmates present. Students are required to attend the entire
presentation session, which should last approximately 2 hours.
Online students will use a Web Conferencing tool, and must
have their own computer microphones.
Important note about attendance: This presentation is worth 150
points, and if you fail to attend, you will not receive credit for
the presentation. Exceptions to this policy will be made only
forthe following unique emergency situations:
· In the event that the area in which a student resides
experiences an extended power outage due to a natural disaster
(hurricane, flood, storm, etc.)
· A student is on active military duty and cannot complete
coursework
· A student has a verifiable (documented) medical or other

personal emergency
Each presentation should begin with an introduction of the team
members, then move to a discussion of each of the elements of
the team assignment using Power Point slides.
The presentation is NOT simply a regurgitation of the written
report. Students should NOT read from the written report. The
focus should be on a presentation of the issues. Avoid
generalized statements and unsubstantiated claims. If “some
people believe that this technology will….”, tell us who they
are! If “experts believe that this will result in an increase of….”
- be specific! Give us the data and tell us who these experts are.
All direct quotes, statistics, and visuals/graphic aids need to be
properly documented. Make sure to note the source on you
PowerPoint slide.
After the slides are presented and the sections have been
discussed, the team members are to ask the class 2- 3 questions
about their technology that will promote discussion among the
other class members. The presentation should end with
recommendations for further research or assessments pertaining
to the technology. Presentations should be 20 – 25 minutes in
length.
Evaluations of other teams: students are expected to evaluate
one other team presentation and complete a Peer Evaluation
form for submission. Know which team you are to evaluate and
take notes during the presentation so that these forms can be
appropriately completed.
Week 8: Peer Review (30 possible points, individual grade)
Students will find a Peer Evaluation form in DocSharing. Each
student is required to fully complete the evaluation of one other
team’s presentation. The team to be evaluated should be clearly
identified, and all questions should be answered using full
sentences with correct spelling and grammar. Assessments
should be respectful and professional in nature. Each student
will submit this assignment to the dropbox by the assigned due
date.

TEAM D WIRELESS ELECTRICITY OUTLINETeam Course Project Wi.docx

TEAM D WIRELESS ELECTRICITY OUTLINETeam Course Project Wi.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to TEAM D WIRELESS ELECTRICITY OUTLINETeam Course Project Wi.docx

Similar to TEAM D WIRELESS ELECTRICITY OUTLINETeam Course Project Wi.docx (19)

More from mattinsonjanel

More from mattinsonjanel (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

TEAM D WIRELESS ELECTRICITY OUTLINETeam Course Project Wi.docx