TEACHER’S LONGLIFE TRAINING
 IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS:
  COLLABORATIVE LEARNING


         Lopes, Mª Cristina
     cristina@ucdb.br (UCDB)
            Silva, Adelina
           ____________
OBJECTIVE

 Identify how teachers, who participate
in GETED, act and learn in a
collaborative way


GETED – Group of studies and researches in
educational technology     and    distance
education
METHODOLOGY
• The collected data registered the changes
  occurred in a group of studies and
  research (GETED) in a private university
  at Brazil.
• These changes were observed at a virtual
  environment - MOODLE - at the discuss
  forum artifact.
LONGLIFE TRAINING

    Pimenta (1999) points out that teacher
development     should  mobilize    theoretical
knowledge and develop the capacity of
investigating one’s own activity. To mobilize,
according to the author, means something
beyond “moving”. Therefore, the teachers’
ongoing education should be a continuous
process focused on practical, theoretical and
pedagogical knowledge
TEACHERS´DEVELOPMENT
    Perrenoud (1999) synthesizes in a
perspicacious way that at actual context is
needed       to    reinforce     teachers’
development for a reflexive practice,
promote innovation and cooperation,
prepare professionals who are reflexive
and dynamic, who know how to work in
groups, how to search and select
information, how to take decisions and
develop autonomy in relation to their own
learning process.
CRITICAL DOMAINS OF THE
TECHNOLOGICAL LANGUAGE

  According to Sampaio & Leite (1999),
teacher     needs    to   dominate    the
technological     language    and      its
technological literacy, but not just the
mechanical use of the resources, but also
the critical domain of the technological
language.
TEACHERS´CONCEPTIONS - LONGLIFE
           TRAINING


  Participant (A)[1] Here, we teach and learn.
Several thematics discussed at the meetings are
opportunities to learn new things and not to be
“restricted” to our own object of research.



  [1] The excerpts were transcribed without any
alteration, with fictitious identifications to
maintain the anonymity of the participants.
TEACHERS´CONCEPTIONS - LONGLIFE
           TRAINING

• Participant (B) The group develops activities and
  participations providing enriched thematics
  which are studied.
• Participant (C) I’m at GETED to reflect about the
  use of the Technologies in the educational
  context, to learn, to share experiences and to
  discover … with participants
• Participant (D) I feel like a researcher (curious),
  more critical in relation to my professional
  practice from the readings done at the group.
COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITIES AT
   A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT


 Communities, to be considered as such,
should have an objective, an identity,
communication, trust, reputation, group
formation, borders, government, change
or commerce, expression and history
(TYPALDOS, 2000).
SHARING EXPERIENCES

Menezes et al. (2002) state that teachers
build their knowledge through their
experiences and share them with other
acquired knowledge, with other people,
enriching and offering more quality to their
pedagogical works
A SPACE OF CHANGES AND
   MOMENTS OF REFLECTION
• Participant (A) I found this interview at the
  internet... It is about virtual communities. Well, I
  think you know a lot about this subject, but I
  found it interesting. I hope you like it.
• Participant (B) Actually, it is interesting the way
  how the virtual community is shown, it awakes
  us to think about building one, how to do it and
  with which objectives.
• Participant (C) I have already finished reading it.
  Thanks. I have not known it yet. As we can see,
  the author wrote quite a lot about this subject.
INSTIGATING THE LEARNING
           PROCESS
• Participant (A) Hi, everybody. I had the pleasure to
  watch the film “With Honors”, suggested by the teacher
  B in our last meeting and I understood that the focus of
  the film is the thesis of life itself. It is about Einstein and
  the relativity, about politics, that to write it is necessary a
  lot of critical reading from the books and from the world.
• Participant (C) Thanks teacher A for sharing with us
  information about the film “With Honors”. Reading your
  observations I started to think what we our intentions are
  when giving the students some orientations... we give to
  our pupils during the development of their researches
  and what they intend with their own researches.
RESPONSIBILITY OF
   SEARCHING AND ANALYZING
    CRITICALLY KNOWLEDGE
• Participant (A) In the next meeting of GETED we
  will talk about the thematic WIKI. We will firstly
  use a forum to read the text and then to debate
  about it.
• Participant (B) I believe that the proposal is
  interesting. Even thought it causes in the
  beginning some queerness, the situation can
  provide us new learning experiences and
  increase our familiarity to new contexts. I will
  read the text in order to participate with some
  comments.
SHARING UNDERSTANDINGS
 Lave and Wenger (1991, p.98) state that
“Community does not imply necessarily
co-presence, a well-defined identifiable
group, or socially visible boundaries. It
does imply participation in an activity
system about which participants share
understandings concerning what they are
doing and what that means in their lives
and for their communities”.
SOME CONSIDERATIONS
 In face of the statements written by them
on the platform focusing various subjects,
we believe that innovation is not restricted
to the use of the technology, but teacher´s
appropriation of these resources, creating
new ways of working, of sharing
knowledge, of dealing with students, of
producing different ways of teaching and
learning.
REFERENCES
•   LAVE, J. & WENGER, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral
    Participation, New York, Cambridge University Press
•   MENEZES, Crediné Silva et al. , 2002, Uma Proposta Baseada em
    Comunidades Virtuais de Aprendizagem, Anais do XIII Simpósio Brasileiro
    de Informática na Educação – XIII SBIE, São Leopoldo/RS, vol. 1, pp. 168-
    177
•   PERRENOUD, P. , 1999, Formar professores em contextos sociais em mudança:
    prática reflexiva e participação crítica, in Revista Brasileira de Educação, n. 12,
    set/nov/dez, p. 5-21
•   PIMENTA, S. G., 1999, Formação de professores: identidade e saberes da docência,
    in. Saberes pedagógicos e atividade docente, Cortez, São Paulo
•   SAMPAIO, M. N. & LEITE, L. S. , 1999, Alfabetização tecnológica do
    professor, Vozes, Petrópolis, RJ
•   TYPALDOS, C. , 2000, Shared Knowledge and a common Purpose: Using
    the 12 principles of civilization to build web communities, Retrieved from the
    http://www.RealCommunities.com

Teacher’s longlife training in virtual environments

  • 1.
    TEACHER’S LONGLIFE TRAINING IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: COLLABORATIVE LEARNING Lopes, Mª Cristina cristina@ucdb.br (UCDB) Silva, Adelina ____________
  • 2.
    OBJECTIVE Identify howteachers, who participate in GETED, act and learn in a collaborative way GETED – Group of studies and researches in educational technology and distance education
  • 3.
    METHODOLOGY • The collecteddata registered the changes occurred in a group of studies and research (GETED) in a private university at Brazil. • These changes were observed at a virtual environment - MOODLE - at the discuss forum artifact.
  • 4.
    LONGLIFE TRAINING Pimenta (1999) points out that teacher development should mobilize theoretical knowledge and develop the capacity of investigating one’s own activity. To mobilize, according to the author, means something beyond “moving”. Therefore, the teachers’ ongoing education should be a continuous process focused on practical, theoretical and pedagogical knowledge
  • 5.
    TEACHERS´DEVELOPMENT Perrenoud (1999) synthesizes in a perspicacious way that at actual context is needed to reinforce teachers’ development for a reflexive practice, promote innovation and cooperation, prepare professionals who are reflexive and dynamic, who know how to work in groups, how to search and select information, how to take decisions and develop autonomy in relation to their own learning process.
  • 6.
    CRITICAL DOMAINS OFTHE TECHNOLOGICAL LANGUAGE According to Sampaio & Leite (1999), teacher needs to dominate the technological language and its technological literacy, but not just the mechanical use of the resources, but also the critical domain of the technological language.
  • 7.
    TEACHERS´CONCEPTIONS - LONGLIFE TRAINING Participant (A)[1] Here, we teach and learn. Several thematics discussed at the meetings are opportunities to learn new things and not to be “restricted” to our own object of research. [1] The excerpts were transcribed without any alteration, with fictitious identifications to maintain the anonymity of the participants.
  • 8.
    TEACHERS´CONCEPTIONS - LONGLIFE TRAINING • Participant (B) The group develops activities and participations providing enriched thematics which are studied. • Participant (C) I’m at GETED to reflect about the use of the Technologies in the educational context, to learn, to share experiences and to discover … with participants • Participant (D) I feel like a researcher (curious), more critical in relation to my professional practice from the readings done at the group.
  • 9.
    COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITIES AT A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT Communities, to be considered as such, should have an objective, an identity, communication, trust, reputation, group formation, borders, government, change or commerce, expression and history (TYPALDOS, 2000).
  • 10.
    SHARING EXPERIENCES Menezes etal. (2002) state that teachers build their knowledge through their experiences and share them with other acquired knowledge, with other people, enriching and offering more quality to their pedagogical works
  • 11.
    A SPACE OFCHANGES AND MOMENTS OF REFLECTION • Participant (A) I found this interview at the internet... It is about virtual communities. Well, I think you know a lot about this subject, but I found it interesting. I hope you like it. • Participant (B) Actually, it is interesting the way how the virtual community is shown, it awakes us to think about building one, how to do it and with which objectives. • Participant (C) I have already finished reading it. Thanks. I have not known it yet. As we can see, the author wrote quite a lot about this subject.
  • 12.
    INSTIGATING THE LEARNING PROCESS • Participant (A) Hi, everybody. I had the pleasure to watch the film “With Honors”, suggested by the teacher B in our last meeting and I understood that the focus of the film is the thesis of life itself. It is about Einstein and the relativity, about politics, that to write it is necessary a lot of critical reading from the books and from the world. • Participant (C) Thanks teacher A for sharing with us information about the film “With Honors”. Reading your observations I started to think what we our intentions are when giving the students some orientations... we give to our pupils during the development of their researches and what they intend with their own researches.
  • 13.
    RESPONSIBILITY OF SEARCHING AND ANALYZING CRITICALLY KNOWLEDGE • Participant (A) In the next meeting of GETED we will talk about the thematic WIKI. We will firstly use a forum to read the text and then to debate about it. • Participant (B) I believe that the proposal is interesting. Even thought it causes in the beginning some queerness, the situation can provide us new learning experiences and increase our familiarity to new contexts. I will read the text in order to participate with some comments.
  • 14.
    SHARING UNDERSTANDINGS Laveand Wenger (1991, p.98) state that “Community does not imply necessarily co-presence, a well-defined identifiable group, or socially visible boundaries. It does imply participation in an activity system about which participants share understandings concerning what they are doing and what that means in their lives and for their communities”.
  • 15.
    SOME CONSIDERATIONS Inface of the statements written by them on the platform focusing various subjects, we believe that innovation is not restricted to the use of the technology, but teacher´s appropriation of these resources, creating new ways of working, of sharing knowledge, of dealing with students, of producing different ways of teaching and learning.
  • 16.
    REFERENCES • LAVE, J. & WENGER, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York, Cambridge University Press • MENEZES, Crediné Silva et al. , 2002, Uma Proposta Baseada em Comunidades Virtuais de Aprendizagem, Anais do XIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação – XIII SBIE, São Leopoldo/RS, vol. 1, pp. 168- 177 • PERRENOUD, P. , 1999, Formar professores em contextos sociais em mudança: prática reflexiva e participação crítica, in Revista Brasileira de Educação, n. 12, set/nov/dez, p. 5-21 • PIMENTA, S. G., 1999, Formação de professores: identidade e saberes da docência, in. Saberes pedagógicos e atividade docente, Cortez, São Paulo • SAMPAIO, M. N. & LEITE, L. S. , 1999, Alfabetização tecnológica do professor, Vozes, Petrópolis, RJ • TYPALDOS, C. , 2000, Shared Knowledge and a common Purpose: Using the 12 principles of civilization to build web communities, Retrieved from the http://www.RealCommunities.com