Kendi başına Medikal Cihaz olan ve bir medikal cihaza gömülü olarak çalışan yazılımların geliştirilmesinde baz alınan EN 62304 Tıbbi Cihaz Yazılım Yaşam Çevrimi standardı, Yazılımların belgelendirmesinde bulunması gereken teknik dosya gereklilikleri, Temel seviye yazılım test teknikleri EN 62304 standardının diğer standartlarla ilişkisi anlatılmıştır.
Significant changes are underway that impact the quality and regulatory systems of medical device companies and their suppliers. ISO 13485:2016 adds new requirements to address risk management and to better align the standard with global regulatory requirements (FDA, MDD, JPAL, etc.). With the release of ISO 9001:2015, the ISO 9001 and ISO 13485 standards are no longer integrated. A new single audit MDSAP program will be in effect beginning 2017 that incorporates applicable FDA, Canadian, Brazilian, Australian and Japanese quality system requirements into the annual ISO 13485 audit cycle. The presentation will provide an overview of these changes and the steps required to incorporate these changes into existing quality management systems.
The primary objective of ISO 13485 certification is to standardize regulatory requirements for quality management systems. URS provide ISO 13485 certification in all India.
IEC 62304 is the international standard that defines software development lifecycle requirements for medical device software. The standard was developed from the perspective that product testing alone is insufficient to ensure patient safety when software is involved. The standard requires all aspects of the software development life cycle to be scrutinized.
Prepare your medical device for market with this Action List that walks you through the complexities of IEC 62304
Update on software as a medical device (SaMD)TGA Australia
This presentation will explore the definition of a medical device and how this applies to software. In addition, the nuances of the kinds of software will be discussed in relation to their likely classification as a medical device.
This presentation was delivered as a webinar for FDAnews, delving into software, medical devices and managing risk with 21 CFR Part 11 and IEC 62304. It provides:
• A historical backdrop of IEC 62304
• An overview of IEC 62304
• Implementing IEC 62304
• Common pitfalls to avoid
Significant changes are underway that impact the quality and regulatory systems of medical device companies and their suppliers. ISO 13485:2016 adds new requirements to address risk management and to better align the standard with global regulatory requirements (FDA, MDD, JPAL, etc.). With the release of ISO 9001:2015, the ISO 9001 and ISO 13485 standards are no longer integrated. A new single audit MDSAP program will be in effect beginning 2017 that incorporates applicable FDA, Canadian, Brazilian, Australian and Japanese quality system requirements into the annual ISO 13485 audit cycle. The presentation will provide an overview of these changes and the steps required to incorporate these changes into existing quality management systems.
The primary objective of ISO 13485 certification is to standardize regulatory requirements for quality management systems. URS provide ISO 13485 certification in all India.
IEC 62304 is the international standard that defines software development lifecycle requirements for medical device software. The standard was developed from the perspective that product testing alone is insufficient to ensure patient safety when software is involved. The standard requires all aspects of the software development life cycle to be scrutinized.
Prepare your medical device for market with this Action List that walks you through the complexities of IEC 62304
Update on software as a medical device (SaMD)TGA Australia
This presentation will explore the definition of a medical device and how this applies to software. In addition, the nuances of the kinds of software will be discussed in relation to their likely classification as a medical device.
This presentation was delivered as a webinar for FDAnews, delving into software, medical devices and managing risk with 21 CFR Part 11 and IEC 62304. It provides:
• A historical backdrop of IEC 62304
• An overview of IEC 62304
• Implementing IEC 62304
• Common pitfalls to avoid
Agile Testing - presentation for Agile User Groupsuwalki24.pl
Agile testing was present on Agile User Group. Presentation covers all aspects of testing on agile process, highlight the role of automation and issues with managing it.
An Inside Look at Changes to the New ISO 14971:2019 from a Member of the Stan...Greenlight Guru
The 3rd Edition of the medical device risk management standard, ISO 14971:2019, and its companion guidance document, ISO TR 24971:2019, will be published by year-end.
The new structure of the two documents will be presented so that the manufacturer can determine any changes to the risk management system and possibly the quality system that may be required.
These may include simple reference changes in procedures or revision to production and post-production processes that may be required.
Presenter Edwin Bills is an international member of the technical committee, ISO TC 210 JWG1, responsible for the revision of the third edition of ISO 14971 risk management standard.
TALK TAKEAWAYS:
• A detailed look at the new changes to ISO 14971:2019 and ISO TR 24971:2019.
• Reasons for the changes to the latest version
• How to prepare for the coming changes in the standard
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
While ISO 13485 is written in black and white, the alignment between the standard's requirements and expectations is not always clear - especially in regards to SaMD (software as a medical device). This session will discuss aligning ISO 13485 with best practices for SaMD, and how we can expect the shift of the industry to impact the anchor standard of the medical device industry.
This presentation originally aired during the 2022 Future of QMS Requirements Virtual Summit.
Update on software as a medical device (SaMD)TGA Australia
This presentation explores the definition of a medical device and how this applies to software. In addition, the nuances of the kinds of software are discussed in relation to their likely classification as a medical device.
The Future of Quality and Regulatory for SaMDJanel Heilbrunn
Join industry experts from ICS and Greenlight Guru to discuss recent updates and changes in SaMD, regulatory and quality considerations in growing technologies including AI, mobile and cloud and three steps to take today to prepare for the future.
Speed your time to market by following the step-by-step instructions.
You'll learn the steps to success for product testing by a certification agency (like UL, TÜV, BSI, Intertek, etc.) to the IEC 60601-1 series of standards on medical electrical equipment and systems.
See the mistakes others have made that have slowed down their certification process (and how you can avoid them).
Take proactive steps so your product doesn’t need to get redesigned after testing starts.
Specifically, you will learn:
-The scope of IEC 60601-1 standards & if they apply to your product.
-What you need to know to classify your products to the IEC 60601-1 series.
-What is an isolation diagram and how does that help me with my design?
-Determine the applicable tests for your device.
-What are the marking and labeling requirements for the device?
-Know your critical components.
-What pre-tests to run and what’s not worth testing?
-Resources to help with this process and ways to reduce the paperwork off your backs.
Watch the presentation here: https://www.greenlight.guru/webinar/iec-60601-1
Adverse Event reporting in Medical Device Clinical Trials under the MDRAnnet Visscher
With the change from MDD to MDR Adverse Event (AE) reporting in Medical Device Clinical Trials is supposed to be more clear and uniform, but is it?
Conclusion is that at this moment it is not due to several reasons, the main ones being that the clinical module in EUDAMED is not ready yet leading to different reporting requirements for the different EU countries, and that the MDR focusses on reporting to the Competent Authorities and central or local Ethics Committees may have different reporting requirements.
So regardless MDR directions, it is key to check AE reporting needs with every regulatory body involved at the start of your Medical Device Clinical Trial to make sure you are compliant with the applicable requirements.
ISO 62304: Defines processes that are required in any given SDLC to ensure that it compiles with the creation or maintenance medical device software
Andy Stopford has over 16 years experience leading teams to deliver pioneering software solutions that enable business goals to be achieved. With experience drawn from the e-commerce, financial, insurance, banking and healthcare sectors he is committed to creating quality software that adheres to best practices and delivers solutions that are robust and help clients achieve business goals.
Andy is a software engineer by trade and is a published book author and keen writer with 200 magazine and journal articles over his career. He has a great depth and breadth of knowledge in a variety of technologies and is passionate about all things software engineering.
Andy leads the HAVAS HEALTH SOFTWARE team of software engineers to develop solutions that focus on the best possible outcome for the end user that ensure the business needs are met.
@andystopford
Cybersecurity and Software Updates in Medical Devices.pdfICS
Justin is a Senior Consulting Engineer and Qt Certified Instructor at Integrated Computer Solutions, Inc. (ICS). He has taught Qt and Qt Quick/QML material for both public and on-site courses for many years. He has also written and conducted seminars on Object-Oriented GUI Design techniques. Justin earned his bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering Technology from Northeastern University.
Agile Testing - presentation for Agile User Groupsuwalki24.pl
Agile testing was present on Agile User Group. Presentation covers all aspects of testing on agile process, highlight the role of automation and issues with managing it.
An Inside Look at Changes to the New ISO 14971:2019 from a Member of the Stan...Greenlight Guru
The 3rd Edition of the medical device risk management standard, ISO 14971:2019, and its companion guidance document, ISO TR 24971:2019, will be published by year-end.
The new structure of the two documents will be presented so that the manufacturer can determine any changes to the risk management system and possibly the quality system that may be required.
These may include simple reference changes in procedures or revision to production and post-production processes that may be required.
Presenter Edwin Bills is an international member of the technical committee, ISO TC 210 JWG1, responsible for the revision of the third edition of ISO 14971 risk management standard.
TALK TAKEAWAYS:
• A detailed look at the new changes to ISO 14971:2019 and ISO TR 24971:2019.
• Reasons for the changes to the latest version
• How to prepare for the coming changes in the standard
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
While ISO 13485 is written in black and white, the alignment between the standard's requirements and expectations is not always clear - especially in regards to SaMD (software as a medical device). This session will discuss aligning ISO 13485 with best practices for SaMD, and how we can expect the shift of the industry to impact the anchor standard of the medical device industry.
This presentation originally aired during the 2022 Future of QMS Requirements Virtual Summit.
Update on software as a medical device (SaMD)TGA Australia
This presentation explores the definition of a medical device and how this applies to software. In addition, the nuances of the kinds of software are discussed in relation to their likely classification as a medical device.
The Future of Quality and Regulatory for SaMDJanel Heilbrunn
Join industry experts from ICS and Greenlight Guru to discuss recent updates and changes in SaMD, regulatory and quality considerations in growing technologies including AI, mobile and cloud and three steps to take today to prepare for the future.
Speed your time to market by following the step-by-step instructions.
You'll learn the steps to success for product testing by a certification agency (like UL, TÜV, BSI, Intertek, etc.) to the IEC 60601-1 series of standards on medical electrical equipment and systems.
See the mistakes others have made that have slowed down their certification process (and how you can avoid them).
Take proactive steps so your product doesn’t need to get redesigned after testing starts.
Specifically, you will learn:
-The scope of IEC 60601-1 standards & if they apply to your product.
-What you need to know to classify your products to the IEC 60601-1 series.
-What is an isolation diagram and how does that help me with my design?
-Determine the applicable tests for your device.
-What are the marking and labeling requirements for the device?
-Know your critical components.
-What pre-tests to run and what’s not worth testing?
-Resources to help with this process and ways to reduce the paperwork off your backs.
Watch the presentation here: https://www.greenlight.guru/webinar/iec-60601-1
Adverse Event reporting in Medical Device Clinical Trials under the MDRAnnet Visscher
With the change from MDD to MDR Adverse Event (AE) reporting in Medical Device Clinical Trials is supposed to be more clear and uniform, but is it?
Conclusion is that at this moment it is not due to several reasons, the main ones being that the clinical module in EUDAMED is not ready yet leading to different reporting requirements for the different EU countries, and that the MDR focusses on reporting to the Competent Authorities and central or local Ethics Committees may have different reporting requirements.
So regardless MDR directions, it is key to check AE reporting needs with every regulatory body involved at the start of your Medical Device Clinical Trial to make sure you are compliant with the applicable requirements.
ISO 62304: Defines processes that are required in any given SDLC to ensure that it compiles with the creation or maintenance medical device software
Andy Stopford has over 16 years experience leading teams to deliver pioneering software solutions that enable business goals to be achieved. With experience drawn from the e-commerce, financial, insurance, banking and healthcare sectors he is committed to creating quality software that adheres to best practices and delivers solutions that are robust and help clients achieve business goals.
Andy is a software engineer by trade and is a published book author and keen writer with 200 magazine and journal articles over his career. He has a great depth and breadth of knowledge in a variety of technologies and is passionate about all things software engineering.
Andy leads the HAVAS HEALTH SOFTWARE team of software engineers to develop solutions that focus on the best possible outcome for the end user that ensure the business needs are met.
@andystopford
Cybersecurity and Software Updates in Medical Devices.pdfICS
Justin is a Senior Consulting Engineer and Qt Certified Instructor at Integrated Computer Solutions, Inc. (ICS). He has taught Qt and Qt Quick/QML material for both public and on-site courses for many years. He has also written and conducted seminars on Object-Oriented GUI Design techniques. Justin earned his bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering Technology from Northeastern University.
PMBOK v5'e göre hazırlanmış olan Kalite Yönetimi eğitimi sunusudur. Sunu ve sunudaki resimler türkçe hazırlanmıştır, sunularda bulunan dokümanlar zip olarak ayrıca yüklenecektir
Building the continuous integration layer in AveaOguzhan Ozavar
Kaynak Kod Yönetimi, Build & Deployment Otomasyonu, Test Odaklı Geliştirme, Statik Kod Analizi, Test Otomasyonu, Lab Yönetimi, Çevik İterasyonlar, Pipeline Yönetimi
Bir CMMI Seviye 5 Organizasyonel Performans Yönetim Projesi Örneği: Kod Kalit...Deniz Gungor
Bu sunum UYMS (Ulusal Yazılım Mühendisliği Sempozyumu) 2017 Antalya’da sunulan `Bir CMMI Seviye 5 Organizasyonel Performans Yönetim Projesi Örneği: Kod Kalitesini İyileştirmek ` başlıklı makalenin sunumudur.
Makaleye ulaşmak için aşağıdaki linke tıklayınız.
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1980/UYMS17_paper_86.pdf
*****
This presentation is a presentation of the article titled "A CMMI Level 5 Organizational Performance Management Project Example: Improving Code Quality" presented at the UYMS (National Software Engineering Symposium) 2017 Antalya.
Click on the link below to access the article or published paper.
Yazılım Güvenliği Yönetimi Eğitimimiz aşağıdaki konu başlıklarını içermektedir:
Güvenli Yazılım Geliştirme Modelleri
-TOUCHPOINTS
-Secure Development Lifecycle (Microsoft)
-CLASP (Comprehensive, Lightweight Application Security Process)
Risk Yönetimi
Güvenlik Gereksinim Analizi
Teknik Riskler
Sızma Testi ve Statik Kod Analizi
Güvenlik Operasyonu
PMBOK v5'e göre hazırlanmış olan Entegrasyon Yönetimi eğitimi sunusudur. Sunu ve sunudaki resimler türkçe hazırlanmıştır, sunularda bulunan dokümanlar zip olarak ayrıca yüklenecektir
Odoo ile MRP, PLM, Kalite ve Bakım YönetimiMehmet Demirel
Odoo ile MRP, PLM, Kalite ve Bakım Yönetimi. MRP Programı, Malzeme ihtiyaç planlaması, MRP Yazılımı, Üretim kaynak planlaması, ERP Programı, Kurumsal Kaynak Planlama Yazılımı
Similar to Tıbbi cihazlarda yazılım yaşam çevrimi EN 62304 (20)
2. Kapsam ve Genel Bilgiler
• Tasarım + Bakım
• Validasyon Kapsam Dışıdır.
• Kendi başına satılan ve Gömülü Yazılımlar
• EN 14971
• EN 13485
• Temel Test Prensipleri
• Medikal CE Teknik Dosya Gereklilikleri
4. Giriş, Genel Gereklilikler ve Sınıflandırma
• Sınıf A, Sınıf B ve Sınıf C
• Sınıf C + Donanım Önlemi = Sınıf B
• Sınıf B + Donanım Önlemi = Sınıf A
• Risk olasılığı %100 Risk tahmini dayanağı şiddete göre
• Süreçler, Aktiviteler, Görevler
5. Planlama
Üretici yazılımın bütün süreçlerini içeren bir planlama
yapmalı bu planlamayı güncel tutmalı ve yazılı hale
getirmelidir. Planlama yazılım geliştirme modelini
içermelidir.
• Planlama her bir aşamada kullanılacak süreçleri,
aktiviteleri ve görevleri açıklamalıdır.
• Planlamada izlenebilirlik
• Konfigürasyon ve değişiklik yönetimi
• Problem ve hata giderme yönetimi
6. Planlama
• Sistem gereklilikleri
• Standartlar, metotlar ve araçlar
• Entegrasyon ve test
• Doğrulama
• Risk Yönetimi
• Dokümantasyon
• Konfigürasyon
• Destekleyici araçlar
• Konfigürasyon araçları (doğrulamadan önce)
7. Yazılım Gereklilikler Analizi
• Gerekliliklerin tanımlanması
• Gerekliliklere risk kontrol önlemlerinin eklenmesi
• Yazılım gereklilikleri belirlendikten sonra tıbbi cihaz risk
analizinin tekrar değerlendirilmesi
• Yazılım gerekliliklerinin güncel tutulması
• Yazılım gerekliliklerinin doğrulanması
8. Yazılım Mimari Tasarımı
• Sistem gerekliliklerinin mimari tasarıma dönüştürülmesi
• Yazılım parçalarının etkileşiminin tasarlanması
• SOUP performansı ve fonksiyonelliği
• SOUP donanım ve yazılım gerekliliği
• Risk kontrolüne tabi yazılım parçalarını ayırma
• Mimari tasarımın doğrulanması
9. Yazılım Detaylı Tasarımı
• Mimarinin Yazılım Parçalarına dönüştürülmesi
• Arabirimlerin detaylı tasarımı
• Detaylı tasarımın doğrulanması
10. Yazılım Parçalarının Devreye Sokulması ve
Doğrulaması
• Yazılım parçalarının devreye sokulması
• Yazılım parçaları doğrulama sisteminin kurulması
• Yazılım parçalarının kabul kriterlerinin belirlenmesi
• Yazılım parçalarının doğrulanması
11. Yazılım Entegrasyonu ve Entegrasyon Testi
• Yazılım parçalarının entegrasyonu
• Entegrasyonun doğrulanması
• Entegre edilmiş yazılımın test gerekliliklerinin
belirlenmesi ve test gerekliliklerinin doğrulanması
• Regresyon testlerinin gerçekleştirilmesi
• Test sonuçlarının içeriği
• Hata giderme sisteminin kullanılması
12. Yazılım Sistem Testi
• Yazılım gereklilikleri için testlerin kurulması ve
gerçekleştirilmesi
• Hata giderme sürecinin işletilmesi
• Değişikliklerden sonra tekrar test
• Sistem testlerinin doğrulanması
• Sistem test kayıtlarının oluşturulması
13. Yazılımın Serbest Bırakılması
• Yazılım doğrulamanın tamamlanması
• Bilinen kalan anormalliklerin yazılı hale getirilmesi
• Bilinen kalan anormalliklerin değerlendirilmesi
• Serbest bırakılan versiyonun dokümante edilmesi
• Serbest bırakılan yazılımın nasıl üretildiğinin dokümante
edilmesi
• Yazılımın arşivlenmesi
• Serbest bırakılmanın tekrar edilebilir olduğundan emin
olunması
14. Yazılımın Bakımı
• Yazılımın bakım planının oluşturulması
• Geri beslemenin izlenmesi ve değerlendirilmesi
• Hata giderme süreçlerinin izlenmesi
• Değişiklik isteklerinin analizi ve onayı
• Kullanıcı ve otoriteler ile iletişim
• Modifikasyonların yürürlüğe sokulması
• Değiştirilmiş yazılımın serbest bırakılması
15. Yazılımın Risk Yönetimi -1
• Yazılımda riskin meydana gelme olasılığı %100dür.
• Tehlikeli durum oluşturabilecek yazılım parçalarının tespiti
• Tehlikeli durum oluşturabilecek potansiyel nedenlerin
tespiti
• Yayınlanan SOUP anormallik listesinin analizi
• Potansiyel sebeplerin yazılı hale getirilmesi
• Tehlikeli durum oluşturabilecek olayların sırasının yazılı
hale getirilmesi
• Risk kontrol önlemlerinin tanımlanması, bu önlemlerin
yerine getirilmesi, doğrulanması
• Yeni risk yaratabilecek olaylar sırasının tanımlanması
16. Yazılımın Risk Yönetimi -2
• Risk dokümantasyonunun izlenebilirliği
• Değişikliklerde risk yönetimi
17. Yazılımın Konfigürasyon Yönetimi
• Konfigürasyon parçalarının tanımlanması
• SOUPların tanımlanması
• Sistem konfigürasyon dokümantasyonunun tanımlanması
• Konfigürasyon değişikliği onayı, gerçekleştirilmesi ve
doğrulanması
• Değişikliğin izlenebilmesi
• Konfigürasyon durumunun izlenmesi
18. Yazılımın Problem Çözümü Süreci
• Problem raporlarının alınması
• Problemin araştırılması
• Problem hakkında ilgili kişilere bildirim yapılması
• Kayıtların tutulması
• Problem çözümünün doğrulanması
• Yazılımın test edilmesi
19. Yazılım Teknik Dosyasında Olması Gerekenler
• Risk Yönetim Dosyası
• Yazılım güvenlik sınıflandırması
• Yazılım tasarım planı
• Yazılım sistem gereklilikleri
• Yazılım Mimari tasarımı
• Yazılım test planı
• İzlenebilirlik tablosu
• Yazılım test raporu
• Kalan anormallikler
• Konfigürasyon yönetimi dosyası
21. 7 Test Prensibi
• Testin amacı yazılımda hataların olduğunu göstermektir,
yazılımda hata kalmadığını göstermek değildir.
• Yazılımı %100 test etmek imkansızdır
• Teste yazılım geliştirme sürecinin başında başlanmalıdır.
• Hatalar yazılımın belli alanlarında yoğunlaşır
• Böcek ilacı paradoksu; sürekli aynı yerleri test edersek
hata bulamayız, test senaryolarını güncellemek gereklidir.
• Test yaklaşımı ve aktiviteleri yazılım projesinin koşullarına
göre değişir.
• Yeni hata bulamıyoruz başarılı bir yazılım ürettik demek
yanılgıdır. Hatasız yazılım müşteri ihtiyaçlarını tam
karşılıyor anlamına gelmez.