SUPRACONDYLAR
FRACTURE HUMERUS
DR. VEERAMANI.G,
ASST PROFESSOR,DEPT OF ORTHOPAEDICS,
GOVT MEDICAL COLLEGE, TIRUPPUR
ANATOMY
DEFINITION
 Also called as Malgaigne’s fracture
 Fracture line passes just proximal to the
bone masses of trochlea capitulum and
often runs through the apices of
coronoid and olecranon fossae or just
above the fossae or through
metaphysis of humerus
 The fracture line is generally
transverse in frontal plane
EPIDEMIOLOGY
 AGE:PEAK AGE:5-7 YRS
 SEX:BOYS>GIRLS
 SIDE:LEFT>RIGHT
 NERVE INJURY:RADIAL>MEDIAN>ULNAR
 VASCULAR INJURY:1%(BRACHIAL ARTERY)
 OPEN INJURY:<1%
 Remodeling of bone causes decreased AP diameter in the
SUPRACONDYLAR region, making this area susceptible to injury
 Ligamentous laxity increases the likelihood of hyper extension injury
 Anterior capsule is thicker and stronger than posterior capsule. In
extension,the fibers of anterior capsule is taut, serving as fulcrum by
which olecranon becomes firmly engaged in olecranon fossa. With
extreme force ,hyperextension may cause olecranon process to
impinge on superior olecranon fossa and SUPRACONDYLAR region
MECHANISM OF INJURY
EXTENSION TYPE
 FALL ON OUTSTRECHED HAND
 ELBOW –HYPEREXTENDED
 FOREARM-PRONATED/SUPINED
FLEXION TYPE
 FALL DIRECTLY ON THE ELBOW
CLASSIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION
TYPE I
 Non
displaced/Minimally
displaced (<2mm)
 Posterior Fat pad sign
TYPE II
 Displaced #>2mm
 AHL goes anterior to
capitulum
 Posterior cortical
contact intact
TYPE III
 No meaningful cortical
contact between two
fragments
TYPE IV
 Multidirectional instability
 Diagnosed
intraoperatively In
extension capitulum lies
posterior to AHL & In
flexion capitulum lies
anterior to AHL
CLINICAL EVALUATION
 In most cases, children children will not move
the elbow if a fracture is present, although
this may not be the case for non-displaced
fractures.although this may not be the case
for non-displaced fractures.
 Swelling about elbow is a constant feature,
develop within first few hrs.
 S shaped deformity
 Distal humeral tenderness
 Anterior plucker sign +ve
S-Shaped deformity
PUCKER SIGN
RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
 RADIOGRAPHIC VIEWS
 AP
 LATERAL
 OBLIQUE
 AXIAL(JONES)
AP VIEW
 BAUMANN’S ANGLE
 HUMERO ULNAR ANGLE
 METAPHYSIO DIAPHYSEAL ANGLE
BAUMANN’S ANGLE
 Baumann’s angle is formed by a line
perpendicular to the axis of the humerus, and
a lateral physeal line
 There is a wide range of normal value, and it
can vary with rotation of the radiograph
 The Baumann angle is good measurement of
any deviation of distal humerus`s angulation
 In this case, the medial impaction and varus
position alters the Bauman’s angle.
 Normal avg 72 *
ANTERIOR HUMERAL LINE
 This is drawn along the anterior
humeral cortex.
 It should pass through the junction
of anterior & middle 3rd of
capitellum.
RADIOGRAPHIC SIGNS
MANAGEMENT
 Long arm cast
 CMR F/B PIN FIXATION
 ORIF
 TRACTION MANAGEMENT
TYPE I
 Simple long arm splint for 3-7days
 ELBOW 60-90 flexion & forearm in neutral
⁰
position
 If no displacement after 1 week splint is
converted to long arm cast
 If displaced # is reduced f/b casting/pinning
done
TYPE II
 CMR F/B SELECTIVE PINNING WITH SUPPOTIVE
LONG ARM SPLINT
TYOE III AND IV
 Unstable
 Periosteum is torn
 No cortical contact between two fragments
 Associated with soft tissue injury
 Reduction (closed/open)
 Stabilisation (PINS/TRACTION MANAGEMENT)
Reduction technique
 Traction and counter traction
 Milking maneuver
 Correction of medial/lateral displacement
 Correction of rotational deformities
 Correction of posterior displacement by flexion maneuver
 ELBOW held in hyper flexion
 Forearm held in pronation/supination
Reduction technique
PIN FIXATION
 2 Lateral pins (Divergent/Parallel)
 2Crossed pins
 3 Lateral pins
 2 Lateral and 1 medial pins
PIN FIXATION
TRACTION MANAGEMENT
 Skin Traction & Skeletal Traction
 Methods:
 Side arm skin Traction (Dunlop)
 Overhead Skeletal Traction
FLEXION TYPE
 Rare,only 2%
 Distal fragment displaced anterior, flexed
 ULNAR nerve injury is common
 Reduced WITH extension
MANAGEMENT
COMPLICATION
 IMMEDIATE COMPLICATION: at the time of
Fracture
 EARLY COMPLICATION:within first 2-3days
 LATE COMPLICATION:Weeks to months after
Fracture
IMMEDIATE COMPLICATION
 INJURY TO BRACHIAL ARTERY
 NERVE INJURY
EARLY COMPLICATION
 VOLKMANN’S ISCHAEMIA
 COMPARTMENT SYNDROME
LATE COMPLICATION
 MALUNION:CUBITUS VARUS/VALGUS
 NON UNION
 VOLKMANN’S ISCHEAMIC CONTRACTURE
 MYOSITIS OSSIFICANS
 ELBOW STIFFNESS
CUBITUS VARUS DEFORMITY
 GUNSTOCK DEFORMITY
 The distal fragment is tilted medially
and in internal rotation
 Hyper extension at elbow along with
limitation of flexion
 Mild deformity –No treatment
 Severe deformity –Corrective
osteotomy(French osteotomy)
Lateral closing wedge osteotomy
THANK YOU

Supracondylar fracture management , stabilization

  • 1.
    SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE HUMERUS DR. VEERAMANI.G, ASSTPROFESSOR,DEPT OF ORTHOPAEDICS, GOVT MEDICAL COLLEGE, TIRUPPUR
  • 2.
  • 3.
    DEFINITION  Also calledas Malgaigne’s fracture  Fracture line passes just proximal to the bone masses of trochlea capitulum and often runs through the apices of coronoid and olecranon fossae or just above the fossae or through metaphysis of humerus  The fracture line is generally transverse in frontal plane
  • 4.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY  AGE:PEAK AGE:5-7YRS  SEX:BOYS>GIRLS  SIDE:LEFT>RIGHT  NERVE INJURY:RADIAL>MEDIAN>ULNAR  VASCULAR INJURY:1%(BRACHIAL ARTERY)  OPEN INJURY:<1%
  • 5.
     Remodeling ofbone causes decreased AP diameter in the SUPRACONDYLAR region, making this area susceptible to injury  Ligamentous laxity increases the likelihood of hyper extension injury  Anterior capsule is thicker and stronger than posterior capsule. In extension,the fibers of anterior capsule is taut, serving as fulcrum by which olecranon becomes firmly engaged in olecranon fossa. With extreme force ,hyperextension may cause olecranon process to impinge on superior olecranon fossa and SUPRACONDYLAR region
  • 6.
  • 7.
    EXTENSION TYPE  FALLON OUTSTRECHED HAND  ELBOW –HYPEREXTENDED  FOREARM-PRONATED/SUPINED
  • 8.
    FLEXION TYPE  FALLDIRECTLY ON THE ELBOW
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    TYPE I  Non displaced/Minimally displaced(<2mm)  Posterior Fat pad sign
  • 12.
    TYPE II  Displaced#>2mm  AHL goes anterior to capitulum  Posterior cortical contact intact
  • 13.
    TYPE III  Nomeaningful cortical contact between two fragments
  • 14.
    TYPE IV  Multidirectionalinstability  Diagnosed intraoperatively In extension capitulum lies posterior to AHL & In flexion capitulum lies anterior to AHL
  • 15.
    CLINICAL EVALUATION  Inmost cases, children children will not move the elbow if a fracture is present, although this may not be the case for non-displaced fractures.although this may not be the case for non-displaced fractures.  Swelling about elbow is a constant feature, develop within first few hrs.  S shaped deformity  Distal humeral tenderness  Anterior plucker sign +ve
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION  RADIOGRAPHICVIEWS  AP  LATERAL  OBLIQUE  AXIAL(JONES)
  • 19.
    AP VIEW  BAUMANN’SANGLE  HUMERO ULNAR ANGLE  METAPHYSIO DIAPHYSEAL ANGLE
  • 20.
    BAUMANN’S ANGLE  Baumann’sangle is formed by a line perpendicular to the axis of the humerus, and a lateral physeal line  There is a wide range of normal value, and it can vary with rotation of the radiograph  The Baumann angle is good measurement of any deviation of distal humerus`s angulation  In this case, the medial impaction and varus position alters the Bauman’s angle.  Normal avg 72 *
  • 21.
    ANTERIOR HUMERAL LINE This is drawn along the anterior humeral cortex.  It should pass through the junction of anterior & middle 3rd of capitellum.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    MANAGEMENT  Long armcast  CMR F/B PIN FIXATION  ORIF  TRACTION MANAGEMENT
  • 24.
    TYPE I  Simplelong arm splint for 3-7days  ELBOW 60-90 flexion & forearm in neutral ⁰ position  If no displacement after 1 week splint is converted to long arm cast  If displaced # is reduced f/b casting/pinning done
  • 25.
    TYPE II  CMRF/B SELECTIVE PINNING WITH SUPPOTIVE LONG ARM SPLINT
  • 26.
    TYOE III ANDIV  Unstable  Periosteum is torn  No cortical contact between two fragments  Associated with soft tissue injury  Reduction (closed/open)  Stabilisation (PINS/TRACTION MANAGEMENT)
  • 27.
    Reduction technique  Tractionand counter traction  Milking maneuver  Correction of medial/lateral displacement  Correction of rotational deformities  Correction of posterior displacement by flexion maneuver  ELBOW held in hyper flexion  Forearm held in pronation/supination
  • 28.
  • 29.
    PIN FIXATION  2Lateral pins (Divergent/Parallel)  2Crossed pins  3 Lateral pins  2 Lateral and 1 medial pins
  • 30.
  • 31.
    TRACTION MANAGEMENT  SkinTraction & Skeletal Traction  Methods:  Side arm skin Traction (Dunlop)  Overhead Skeletal Traction
  • 32.
    FLEXION TYPE  Rare,only2%  Distal fragment displaced anterior, flexed  ULNAR nerve injury is common  Reduced WITH extension
  • 33.
  • 34.
    COMPLICATION  IMMEDIATE COMPLICATION:at the time of Fracture  EARLY COMPLICATION:within first 2-3days  LATE COMPLICATION:Weeks to months after Fracture
  • 35.
    IMMEDIATE COMPLICATION  INJURYTO BRACHIAL ARTERY  NERVE INJURY
  • 36.
    EARLY COMPLICATION  VOLKMANN’SISCHAEMIA  COMPARTMENT SYNDROME
  • 37.
    LATE COMPLICATION  MALUNION:CUBITUSVARUS/VALGUS  NON UNION  VOLKMANN’S ISCHEAMIC CONTRACTURE  MYOSITIS OSSIFICANS  ELBOW STIFFNESS
  • 38.
    CUBITUS VARUS DEFORMITY GUNSTOCK DEFORMITY  The distal fragment is tilted medially and in internal rotation  Hyper extension at elbow along with limitation of flexion  Mild deformity –No treatment  Severe deformity –Corrective osteotomy(French osteotomy)
  • 39.
  • 42.