The authors of this study evaluated the discrepancies the attitude and action of University of Makati students regarding the no to single-use of plastic. A one-time survey was developed and administered to 50 students and 20 personnel on campus bringing a total of 70 respondents to assess attitudes and actions related to any single-use plastics. The result from the study indicated these findings. First student’s attitudes toward the campaign is not consistent with actions or how the no to single-use of plastic campaign being adhere. Second, students are aware with the practices associated with the university campaign that most of the respondents valued. Finally, the perception of the university personnel with the regards of the no to single-use of plastic campaign is assenting. Additionally, the results revealed that the administration should have a strong support towards the campaign in order to be utilized harmoniously. Based on the findings, recommendation emphasized to the need to incentivize reusable containers, utensils, eco bags and a firm policy order in this campaign.

1. Student’s Attitude and Action Regarding the
No to Single-Use of Plastic Campaign in
University Of Makati
Narella C. Rebullar, Lovely Kate Mabini, Mary Jane M. Cabral,
& Camille P. Dancalan
University of Makati, Makati City
nrebullar.k11507917@umak.edu.ph
Abstract. The authors of this study evaluated the discrepancies the attitude and
action of University of Makati students regarding the no to single-use of plastic.
A one-time survey was developed and administered to 50 students and 20
personnel on campus bringing a total of 70 respondents to assess attitudes
and actions related to any single-use plastics. The result from the study
indicated these findings. First student’s attitudes toward the campaign is not
consistent with actions or how the no to single-use of plastic campaign being
adhere. Second, students are aware with the practices associated with the
university campaign that most of the respondents valued. Finally, the
perception of the university personnel with the regards of the no to single-use
of plastic campaign is assenting. Additionally, the results revealed that the
administration should have a strong support towards the campaign in order to
be utilized harmoniously. Based on the findings, recommendation emphasized
to the need to incentivize reusable containers, utensils, eco bags and a firm
policy order in this campaign.
Keywords: Single-use plastic, reusable, campaign, attitude, action
Introduction
Background of the Study
Single-use plastic is a huge contributor to pollution. Plastic bags, straw, coffee
stirrers, water bottles, and sachets are only a portion of the instances
of the items used by Filipinos, just once and afterward discarded or
thrown away. Barry E. DiGregorio (n.d) wrote in an article that
“disposed plastic materials can remain in the environment for up to
2,000 years and longer.” There is an incredible need to address plastic
contamination for our condition and for the people in the future. As
indicated by reports, the Philippines is the world’s third-biggest
wellspring of plastic contamination. 1Plastics drain poisonous materials
into the groundwater, streaming downstream into lakes and waterways.
Sea contamination emerging from plastic flotsam and jetsam is stifling
our conduits and declining nature issues. In day to day basis, most
plastics, or generously related items are easy to utilize,and plastic bags

2. are particularly normal, and in the household, school, and literature, it
is fairly easy to get data with respect to the negative effect of plastic in
the environment. To make a superior domain for all, it is imperative to
understand the negative effects of plastic, constraining the utilization of
plastic items in regular daily existence. Introducing the perspectives and
activities of the University of Makati with respect to the single-utilization
of Plastic is a significant concentration if this paper.
Review of Related Literature
The restriction on single-utilize plastic items by Representative Winston
Castelo documented in 2018, this bill tries to boycott single-use plastics
and to urge makers and purchasers to utilize increasingly manageable
and ecologically well-disposed items. This demonstration applies to all
producers, importation deals, and exchange and business trade that
utilization single-plastics in the nation. It covers an eliminate plan which
forbids nourishment foundations, retail locations, markets, grocery
stores, and food supplies from utilizing single-utilize plastic. It
additionally investigates the foundation of reusing focuses on nearby
government units (LGUs). Punishments under this bill incorporate a fine
going from P50, 000 to P200, 000. Violators might be ineligible to apply
for licenses to operate. (CNN Philippines Staff, 2020)
Makati also implements a plastic ban, more than 17,500 retail and
food establishments in Makati are prohibited from utilizing plastics,
Styrofoam and other non-biodegradable bundling beginning June 20.
There was a nine-year grace period for compliance of a provision in the
Solid Waste Management Code of Makati, which was sanctioned in 2003.
The grace period finished last December 31, however, was broadened
by means of Executive Order No. 007-2012 to give foundations more
opportunity to drain plastic inventories. (ABS-CBN Corporation, 2013)
Theoretical Framework
The present study is based on the Theory of Change that is essentially a
comprehensive description and illustration of how and why the desired
change is expected to happen in a particular context. It does this by first
recognizing the ideal objectives and afterward works once more from
these to distinguish all the conditions (results) that must be set up (and
how these identified with each other causally) for the objectives to
happen. These are totally mapped out in an Outcomes Framework. This
prompts better planning, in that activities are connected to a detailed
comprehension of how change really occurs. It likewise stimulates better
assessment. (The Center for Theory of Change, Inc. 2019)

3. Conceptual framework
Statement of the problem
The following are the research question:
1. Do students of the University of Makati adhere to the no to single-use
of plastic campaign?
2. What are the practices of the respondents use to adhere to the no to
single-use of plastic campaign?
3. What are the perception of the university personnel with regards to the
effects of no to single-use of plastic campaign at the University of
Makati?
OUTPUTPROCESS
INPUT
1. Students of the
University of
Makati adhere
to the “no to
single use of
plastic
campaign”.
2. Practices of the
respondents to
adhere to no to
single use of
plastic.
3. Perceptions of
the university
personnel with
regards to the
effect of the
campaign.
Conduct a survey
that can answer
with the Yes or
No questions.
1. Determine the
student’s
attitude
toward to the
campaign.
2. Students will
be more aware
and
knowledgeable
to the
campaign.
3. To determine
if there’s a
progress to
the campaign.

4. Significance of the Study
The result of the study will be a great benefit to the following:
University Students. This study will give awareness and sense to
participate in the information and practices about the single-use of
plastic. They are counted as a supporter and act as a foundation or role
model to implement the single-use of the plastic campaign in the
University of Makati.
University Personnel. This study will help the University personnel to
know if the implementation of the campaign is effective to the students.
Also, it can help them to identify and assess what will be their step to
implement it in a better way.
Future Researcher. This study will also help the future researcher to
support their study with regards to the no to single-use of plastic.
Scope and Limitation
This study focuses on the student’s action and attitude with regards to the no
to single-use of plastic campaign in the university. The data collection
will be conducted to 50 students of university and 20 university
personnel who will serve as respondents to the study. This study will not
be a focus on other problems that are not considered as one of the
campaign problems. The other student which not part of the university
is not within the scope of this research. The study would be done
through conducting one-time survey questioner to the students and
university personnel, by that method the researcher will be able to
determine the action and attitude regarding to the no to single use of
plastic campaign.
Methodology
Research Design
The study uses descriptive research to assess the student’s adherence on the
no to single-use of plastic campaign at the University of Makati. It is
purposive procedure of information gathering, dissecting, grouping and
arranging information about the adherence and practices of the
understudies towards the no to single-use of the plastic campaign. As
well as the perception of the university personnel with respect to the
impact of the no to single-use of plastic campaign at the University of
Makati. Along these lines, understanding about such information with or
without the help of measurable treatment.

5. Research Locale
This study will be conducted at the University of Makati. The respondents will
answer the Filter or Contingency Survey (Yes/No) through Random
Sampling from both Senior High School Students and College Students
as well as the personnel of the University of Makati. The study will be
conducted in the second semester of the academic year 2019-2020.
Research Instruments
The authors will utilize one research instrument in the study. The researcher
will use Filter or Contingency Survey that typically formatted as ask
“yes/no” meant to help respondents to avoid answering questions that
do not pertain to them. Respondents who answer “yes” to filter
questions are asked more detailed follow-up questions, whereas those
who answer “no” are not question further on the topic. It is used for
clear distinction of qualities, experiences or respondents opinions.In the
readiness of the instrument, the necessities in the structuring of good
information assortment instrument were thought of. For instance,
statement describing the situations or issues pertaining was turned
down to accommodate the knowledge preparedness of the respondents.
Follow- up questions were provided to further know the opinions of the
respondents. Thus, the instrument is approved to get substantial
responses of the respondents. Preference for the use of the structured
questionnaire is premised on several research assumptions such as a.)
Cost of being at least expensive means of gathering data b.) Avoidance
of personal bias c.) Less pressure for immediate response, and giving
the respondents a greater opinions or ides. At last it urged open results
to sensitive issues. In validation the instrument was validated by
professor before it laid on to the study.
Research Procedure
The first step before going to the testing proper is to make an approval by the
professor. In administering the one-time questionnaire, the researcher
was use the time allotted for vacant to avoid distraction of class
discussions. Copies of the approved questionnaires were distributed to
the respondents randomly. The student responses were given time
allotment as to 4-5 minutes.

6. Method of Analysis
The researcher use Quantitative method where in the data collected by
emphasizing the objective measurements and the statistical, numerical
analysis of the information collected through survey. The purpose of this
method is to control the pre-existing measurable information utilizing
computational methods. Also conclusively observe the actions with
regards to no single use of plastic in the university. And lastly to prove
the gathered data through the interpretation of the data collected from
the respondents.
The primary investigative instrument is a one-time survey
administered to university students. This research involves a survey
based approach. The statistics collected in this research may be used
for investigating contingent relations between specific localities
regarding particular social phenomena. In this case, the social
phenomena are attitudes and actions of students toward the single-use
plastics, and the locality is the University of Makati.
Result
Fifty students and 20 personnel completed the random survey measuring the
attitudes and actions in no to single-use of plastic campaign in the
university. This section involves an analysis and description of research
results. Random sampling of students on campus produced 50 student
and 20 personnels. The respondents are observed to be ABM, CBFS, and
Pharmacy students. There are no demographic information collected.
The following research statements are being analyzed on how ‘no to
single-use of plastic campaign’ are being utilized.

7. Problem 1.
Do students of the University of Makati adhere to the no to single-use of plastic
campaign?
Figure 1. Familiarity of students in “No-to-Single use of Plastic
As depicted from Fig.1 Most students surveyed, 62% were aware with the “no
to single use of plastic” campaign in the university. Therefore, the
researchers may assume that most participants had given this topic
some consideration prior to participation in the research. However 38%
of participants were not aware with the “no to single use of plastic”
campaign in the university, therefore that 38% may or may not pay
attention to University announcement/news.
The follow-up figure shown at the top is a representation of the
follow-up question to the survey conducted of the researcher. As the
respondents answer’s yes to the question there will be a follow-up
question, such as announcement in UMak TV, lunch box parade, and
posters. Out of 31 students who response Yes to the given question,
58.10% answers that they knew it through the announcement in the
university’s TV. While 32.30% of the response knew it through the
Parade happened in the University. And lastly, 9.70% of the students
knew it through Posters posted around the university’s canteen.
Yes
62%
No
38%
Q1: Are you familiar with the “no to single use of
plastic” campaign in the university?
58%
10%
32%
Q1. If yes, how did you know about it?
announcement in Umak TV
lunch box parade
posters

8. Figure 2. Student’s awareness to the negative consequences of the single
use of plastic product cause for humans and the environment
As showed from Fig, 2 Majority of the students who serve as the respondents
to this research answers the survey if they are aware to the negative
consequences of the single use of plastic products cause for humans and
the environment, are Yes. 98% of the students in the university are
aware to the negative impact of the use of plastic in the environment.
And only 2% of the students are not aware to the consequences.
The figure shown at the top is the presentation of response of the
students who answer yes to the question given to the survey. 44.9% of
the student’s response that the most common consequences of using
plastic product is the plastic pollution. While the 40.8% of the answer is
aware to the negative effect of the plastic product to the environment
that will result in clogging in drainage. And lastly, only 14.3% of the
students are aware that using of plastic will result to the exposure to
cancer.
14%
45%
41%
Q2. Follow-up: what are they?
exposure to cancer
plastic pollution
clogging in drainage
98%
2%
Q2: Are you aware of the negative consequences of
the single use of plastic product cause for humans
and the environment?
YES NO

9. Figure 3. Student’s feeling of violation of personal choice if plastic or
disposable products were prohibited from the school
As represent from the Fig. 3, there are 52% of the students who serve as the
respondents to the research answered yes to the question, “Would you
feel a violation of personal choice if plastic or disposable products were
prohibited from the school?” while 48% of the respondents answered no
to the questions. Majority of the students feel a violation if they continue
to use plastic product since they are aware that single use of plastic is
prohibited to the university.
The figure shown is the follow-up response of the students to the
question number 3. 88.5% of the students who answered yes to the
question feel irresponsibility if they will continue to the bad action of the
use of plastic to the university. While 11.5% of the response of the
student think that it is incidentally and not intentionally. And 0% in
disinterested.
88%
0%
12%
Q3. follow-up: why or why not?
feeling of irresponsibility
disinterested
incidentally
52%48%
Q3. Would you feel a violation of personal choice if
plastic or disposable products were prohibited
from the school?
YES NO

10. Figure 4. Students familiarity with the punishment for the law to the "no to
single use of plastic?
In this question 70% of the students answered ‘No’ to the given question if
they are familiar to the punishment for the law to the no to single use
of plastic. Most of the students are not aware to punishment if they will
not adhere to the rules. While only 30% of the students are aware to
the punishment.
The figure shown tells that 66.7% of the students answered that
the punishment will be fine of 100,000 to 1 million pesos. While 33.4%
of the students knew that suspension will be the punishment to those
who do not adhere to the law. And 0% in revocation.
67%
33%
0%
Q4: follow-up: what are
these?
fine of 100,000 to 1 million
suspension
revocation
YES
30%
NO
70%
Question 4. Are you familiar with the punishment
for the law to the "no to single use of plastic?

11. Figure 5. Students as one of the supporters of the campaign
In the chart shown, 84% of the students are supporter to the campaign to the
university. And only 16% of the respondents are not willing to support
the said campaign.
As depicted from the chart, most of the student are willing to use
tumbler instead of plastic bottle, where 61.9% of these. And 61.9% of
the students are willing to use eco- bag or paper bag so that in this ways
they can help the enviand also serve as support to the campaign of the
university.
62%
38%
Q5:Follow-up: How?
use of tumbler instead of the plastic bottle.
bringing eco- bag or paper bag
YES
84%
NO
16%
Question 5: Are you one of the supporters of this
campaign?

12. Problem 2.
What are the practices of the respondents use to adhere to the no to single-
use of plastic campaign?
Figure 6. Student’s action towards bringing lunch box
As illustrated from the figure above, the response of the students seems to
be divided having a close percentage with each other. The percentage
of the students who always bring lunchbox with them is 48% (24)
which is lower, while the students who do not bring their own lunchbox
is 52% (26) which indicates that not all students follow the no-to-
single-use of plastic.
Figure 7. Student’s action in carrying their on stainless spoon and fork
As mentioned, the data shows inconsistency from the previous question. There
are 60% of student who bring their own stainless spoon and fork that
do not match with the 52% who bring their own lunch box. This indicates
that even the students do not bring their own lunchbox, the respondents
keep to bring stainless utensils to avoid using disposable plastic utensils.
Yes
60%
No
40%
Q2. I carry my own stainless spoon and fork
Yes
48%No
52%
Q1.I Always bring a lunch box with me

13. Figure 8. Student’s action in keeping paper/eco bag
As depicted from the figure above, it shows that 68% of the students keep a
paper/eco bag to avoid single use of plastic and eventually using
eco/paper bag would not be thrown away immediately. While the 32%
of the students do not bring their own, that means the respondents still
consider the use of plastic bags as a lightweight material.
Figure 9. Student’s Action in using tumbler rather than water bottle
The chart shows that 84% or 42 of the students have their own tumbler,
which means that the respondents are concern to not use water bottle
for the reason that it is not only costly to buy everytime but it is an
addition to the plastic waste produced. While the 16% or 8 of the
students do not have their own tumbler, it seems that they buy water
bottle or drink on the water fountain.
Yes
68%
No
32%
Q3.I always keep a paper/eco bag
Yes
84%
No
16%
Q4.I have my own tumbler, instead of using a water
bottle

14. Figure 10. Student’s attitude in creating "Do it yourself" stuff from any kind
of plastic material
The data shows that 80% of the respondents create DIY stuff out of any plastic
materials, it means that the respondents are careful with their actions,
while the remaining 20% do not create DIY stuff.
Problem 3.
What are the perception of the university personnel with regards to the effects
of no to single-use of plastic campaign at the University of Makati?
Figure 11. Personnels opinion if there is any progress in the campaign
As represented by the chart above, there are 65% personnels who responded
that there are progress with the campaign. Canteen workers said that
some of the students bring their own container. While there are 35% of
personnels who think that there is no progress with the percentage.
Yes
80%
No
20%
Q5. I create "Do it yourself" stuff from any kind of
plastic material
Yes
65%
No
35%
Q1 Is there any progress in this campaign?

15. Figure 12. Personnels opinion if the plastic garbage decreasing since the
campaign was started
As shown from the chart, there are 70% personnels who responded that the
plastic garbage since the campaign was started because the one
personnale specified that the plastic waste lessen for the reason that
before they carry 3 bags of plastic waste each, but now they only carry
1 bag. However there are 20% of personnels responded ‘no’ if the
garbage decrease, one personnel points out they do not monitor the
plastic garbage, and the other said that then plastic garbage are
increasing.
Figure 13. Students adherence to the campaign
As depicted from the chart above, the personnels response were divided
and closed with each other. The 55% of personnels think that the students
adhere to the campaign, by bringing their own container, paper bag and by
bringing stainless spoon and fork, however the 45% of personnels respond
that some students are not consistent.
Yes
70%
No
30%
Q2 Does plastic garbage decrease since the
campaign was started?
Yes
55%
No
45%
Q3 Are the students of the university really adhere
to the campaign?
Yes

16. Figure 14. Personnels opinion if the campaign will help to minimize
As illustrated from the figure above, 75% of personnels agree that the
campaign will help to minimize the solid waste materials if the campaign
will be implemented seriously, While 25% of the personnels said ‘no’
becaiuse the support from the admin is lacking.
Figure 15. Personnels opinion if the campaign would contribute the
University
As represented by the figure 15, 71% of the personnels think the the said
campaign would be a good contribution to the University because they
think it could lessen the disposable materials, decrease the plastic
pollution and especially it would discipline the students and also the
staffs of the school. While 29% of the personnels do not agree, for the
reason that the students do not really follow.
Yes
75%
No
25%
Q4 Does the “no-to- single-use plastic campaign”
will help to minimize the solid waste
Yes
71%
No
29%
Q5 Does the “no-to- single-use plastic” would be a
good contribution to the University of Makati?

17. Discussion
The research background in conjunction with the data collected indicated
these findings after is a one-time survey administered to university
students:
The assessment of the respondent’s awareness is based on the
assumption that the students already heard about the campaign through
UMak TV, Lunchbox parade and posters. 62% were aware with the “no
to single use of plastic” campaign in the university. Therefore, the
researchers may assume that most participants had given this topic
some consideration prior to participation in the research. However 38%
of participants were not aware with the “no to single use of plastic”
campaign in the university, therefore that 38% may or may not pay
attention to University announcement/news.
Does the UMak Community aware to the negative consequences
of the single-use of plastics? Plastic pollution are the most response
issue according to the result of this study. According to Parker (2019)
Plastic pollution is generally noticeable in developing Asian countries
and African countries, where trash assortment frameworks are
frequently wasteful or nonexistent.
Thus, it is important to clarify if the students would have a feeling
of violation of personal choice if plastic or disposable products were used
although it is prohibited from school. The response of the students were
almost divided, 52% would feel a violation if they continue to use plastic
product since they are aware that single use of plastic is prohibited to
the university. However the result seems to be inconsistent with the
follow-up question, majority of the students would have a feeling of
irresponsibility if the ‘no to single-use of plastic campaign’ were violated.
Consequently, most of the students are not familiarwith the punishment
of the campaign if not follow.
Interestingly, most of the students are supporter of the
university’s campaign by using tumbler instead of plastic bottle, using
of eco- bag or paper bag so that in this ways they can help the enviand
also serve as support to the campaign of the university.
With regards to the perception of the university personnel to the
effects of the campaign are also quite divided, but most of the response
were positive, 65% of the personnel believed that there are progress
due to the decrease of plastic garbage since the campaign was started
because one personnel specified that before they carry 3 bags of plastic

18. waste each, but now they only carry 1 bag. The personnels think that
the students adhere to the campaign, by bringing their own container,
paper bag and by bringing stainless spoon and fork, but some are not
consistent with their actions.
The personnels agree that the campaign will help to minimize the
solid waste materials if the campaign will be implemented seriously,
they think the the said campaign would be a good contribution to the
University because they think it could lessen the disposable materials,
decrease the plastic pollution and especially it would discipline the
students and also the staffs of the school.
In general, all the outcomes collected in this study are controlled
to the moderately short number of samples (70) taking into account
that these expect to speak to the perspectives on the entire University
of Makati community . In this sense, financial and time assets to utilize
a questionaire that would access to a bigger groups for this research
that ought to be considered for further study in the future.
Conclusion
The result of this research project provide insight into attitudes and
actions of students at the University of Makati regarding the no to single-
use of plastic campaign. Student’s attitudes toward the campaign is not
consistent with actions or how they use single-use of plastic. However,
most of the students are supporters of the university’s campaign by
using tumbler instead of plastic bottle, using of eco- bag or paper bag
so that in this ways they can help or serve as support to the campaign
of the university.
Recommendations
No to single use of plastic campaign of the university is a effective way to
prevent the increasing number of plastic which is usually reason in
environmental problem. Therefore, the campaign has a high
effectiveness to the students and to the personnel. With this, the
researcher recommend to the school officials to distribute things that
can be use to minimize the use of plastic in the schools, such as: lunch
box, tumbler, and stainless spoon and fork. Also,since the gathered data
is not 100% effective. the personnel must participate and adhere to the
campaign since they’re the one who proposed this. Another
recommendation,the university must have a firm plicy rule in ording
these campaign. Lastly, university must have seminars about the rules
and policy with regards to the no to single use of plastic campaign.

19. References
ABS-CBN Corporation (2013, May 28). Makati also implements plastic ban.
ABS-CBN News. Retrieved from https://news.abs-
cbn.com/business/05/27/13/makati-also-implements-plastic-ban
CNN Philippines Staff (2020, February 24). ‘Unnecessary’ single-use plastic
products now banned in gov’t offices nationwide. CNN Philippines News.
Retrieved from
https://www.cnnphilippines.com/news/2020/2/24/single-use-plastic-
banned-government-offices-.html
Miller, Kate Elizabeth (2011) Student attitude and action regarding the single-
use plastic shopping bag on The University of Alabama campus.
Retrieved from
https://ir.ua.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/1048/file_1.pdf?seque
nce=1&isAllowed=y
Socialwright. (2017, June 6). Theory of Change. Retrieved from
https://socialwright.wordpress.com/2017/06/10/theory-of-change/
The Center for Theory of Change, Inc. (2019). What is Theory of Change?.
Retrieved from https://www.theoryofchange.org/what-is-theory-of-
change/

20. Appendices
University of Makati
College of Education
Undergraduate Programs
West Rembo, Makati City
Thank you for agreeing to take part in this important survey which examines
the student’s attitude and action regarding the no to single-use of plastic in
University of Makati. This survey should only take 4-5 minutes to complete.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Instruction: Put a checkmark that corresponds to your answer
1. Are you familiar with the “no-to-single use of plastic” campaign in the
university?
 Yes
 No
If yes, how did you know about it?
 Announcement in UMAk Digital TV
 Lunchbox Parade
 Posters
2. Are you aware of the negative consequences of single-use of plastic
product cause for humans and the environment?
 Yes
 No
If yes, what are they?
 Exposure to cancer
 Plastic pollution
 Clogging in drainage
3. Would you feel a violation of personal choice if plastic or disposable
products were prohibited from the school?
 Yes
 No
If yes, Why or why not
 Feeling of Irresponsibility
 Disinterested
 Incidentally

21. 4. Are you familiar with the punishment for the law to the no to single-
use of plastic?
 Yes
 No
If yes, what are they?
 Fine of 100,000 to 1 million
 Suspension
 Revocation
5. Are you one of the supporters of this campaign?
 Yes
 No
If yes, How?
 Use of tumbler instead of the plastic bottle
 Bringing eco-bag or paper bag
II.
Instruction: Put a check mark that corresponds to your answer.
1. I always bring a lunch box with me.
 Yes
 No
2. I carry my own stainless spoon and fork.
 Yes
 No
3. I always keep a paper/eco bag.
 Yes
 No
4. I have my own tumbler, instead of using a water bottle.
 Yes
 No
5. I create “Do it yourself” stuff from any kind of plastic material.
 Yes
 No

22. University of Makati
College of Education
Undergraduate Programs
West Rembo, Makati City
Thank you for agreeing to take part in this important survey which examines
the student’s attitude and action regarding the no to single-use of plastic in
University of Makati. This survey should only take 4-5 minutes to complete.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Instruction: Put a checkmark that corresponds to your answer
1. Is there any progress in this campaign?
 Yes
 No
Please specify:
2. Does plastic garbage decrease since the campaign was started?
 Yes
 No
Please specify:
3. Are the students of the university really adhere to the campaign?
 Yes
 No
Please specify:
4. Does the “no-to- single-use plastic campaign” will help to minimize
the solid waste?
 Yes
 No
Please specify:
5. Does the “no-to- single-use plastic” would be a good contribution to
the University of Makati?
 Yes
 No
Please specify:

23. Documentation