Advice from Useful Science on how to build your own science communication platform. These slides were presented as part of the keynote address at ComSciCon Pacific Northwest 2019. Useful Science is a website and podcast run by volunteers that delivers accurate and reliable summaries of scientific research to the general public.
How much can you say in one sentence? Useful Science Keynote Address at ComSc...Useful Science
ComSciCon is a series of workshops on science communication led and attended by graduate students. From April 12th-13th, Useful Science Director Maryse Thomas joined students at ComSciCon Pacific Northwest 2019 in Seattle and delivered the keynote address, encouraging students to take the plunge and kickstart their own sci-comm initiatives.
CHAPTER6RESEARCHLEARNING OBJECTIVES• Describe the importan.docxtiffanyd4
CHAPTER
6
RESEARCH
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Describe the importance of responsible research choices
• Outline an effective, efficient research strategy
• Create search terms for focused online searches
• Gather relevant research materials
• Discover the note-taking approach that works best for you
• Evaluate the credibility and usefulness of different sources
• Effectively organize research materials and choose the most useful ones
• Correctly cite your sourcesCHAPTER OUTLINE
• Introduction: Becoming an Expert
• Researching Responsibly
• The Research Process
• How to Conduct an Online Search
• Gathering Your Materials
• Reading Your Materials and Taking Notes
• Evaluating Sources
• Revising Your Claims
• Organizing Your Research Information
• Choosing the Sources for Your Speech
• Citing Your Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism
• Getting Help from a Research Expert
Robert and Dixie have been assigned to speak on either side of an issue, a kind of “pros and cons” format. They chose home schooling as their issue. each has a general position on it (Dixie is in favor, and Robert against) but they admit they just don't know that much about it. So what now? How do they become well enough informed to give a speech on the topic? Where should they even start? How can you keep track of your research? Do you have cite it?Overview
Research is necessary for an effective public speech. This chapter will help you make responsible, well-crafted, and carefully executed research choices. First, we will help you figure out what you already know and translate that knowledge into a research strategy. Next, we will provide some concrete tips on where to go for research (including other people as well as the Internet and the library), how to design a good search query for search engines and databases, and how to narrow your search. After that, we will address what you need to do once you have collected your research material, including how to read through it, take notes, and evaluate which sources are worthwhile. Finally, we will deal with how to use your research process to refine your arguments, choose and organize your quotations, and give proper credit for the sources you use in your speech.
MindTap®
Start with a warm-up activity about Stephanie's speech, and review the chapter's Learning Objectives.INTRODUCTION: BECOMING AN EXPERT
Researching, composing, and delivering an effective public speech requires you to acquire some expertise on your topic. You don't have to be the kind of expert who can produce original facts, figures, and data and publish groundbreaking work regarding your topic. But you do need to become enough of an expert on your topic to translate the research that you have done to an audience that may not have the same background or comfort with concepts and terminology that you have developed in your research. On your topic, you are the expert for your audience's purposes. You should cultivate enough expertise on your topic to bring new insights to .
Workshop at SciTalk '22 on strategic science communication in which we make a strong argument for focusing on behavioral goals and communication objectives as beliefs, feelings, and frames.
How much can you say in one sentence? Useful Science Keynote Address at ComSc...Useful Science
ComSciCon is a series of workshops on science communication led and attended by graduate students. From April 12th-13th, Useful Science Director Maryse Thomas joined students at ComSciCon Pacific Northwest 2019 in Seattle and delivered the keynote address, encouraging students to take the plunge and kickstart their own sci-comm initiatives.
CHAPTER6RESEARCHLEARNING OBJECTIVES• Describe the importan.docxtiffanyd4
CHAPTER
6
RESEARCH
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Describe the importance of responsible research choices
• Outline an effective, efficient research strategy
• Create search terms for focused online searches
• Gather relevant research materials
• Discover the note-taking approach that works best for you
• Evaluate the credibility and usefulness of different sources
• Effectively organize research materials and choose the most useful ones
• Correctly cite your sourcesCHAPTER OUTLINE
• Introduction: Becoming an Expert
• Researching Responsibly
• The Research Process
• How to Conduct an Online Search
• Gathering Your Materials
• Reading Your Materials and Taking Notes
• Evaluating Sources
• Revising Your Claims
• Organizing Your Research Information
• Choosing the Sources for Your Speech
• Citing Your Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism
• Getting Help from a Research Expert
Robert and Dixie have been assigned to speak on either side of an issue, a kind of “pros and cons” format. They chose home schooling as their issue. each has a general position on it (Dixie is in favor, and Robert against) but they admit they just don't know that much about it. So what now? How do they become well enough informed to give a speech on the topic? Where should they even start? How can you keep track of your research? Do you have cite it?Overview
Research is necessary for an effective public speech. This chapter will help you make responsible, well-crafted, and carefully executed research choices. First, we will help you figure out what you already know and translate that knowledge into a research strategy. Next, we will provide some concrete tips on where to go for research (including other people as well as the Internet and the library), how to design a good search query for search engines and databases, and how to narrow your search. After that, we will address what you need to do once you have collected your research material, including how to read through it, take notes, and evaluate which sources are worthwhile. Finally, we will deal with how to use your research process to refine your arguments, choose and organize your quotations, and give proper credit for the sources you use in your speech.
MindTap®
Start with a warm-up activity about Stephanie's speech, and review the chapter's Learning Objectives.INTRODUCTION: BECOMING AN EXPERT
Researching, composing, and delivering an effective public speech requires you to acquire some expertise on your topic. You don't have to be the kind of expert who can produce original facts, figures, and data and publish groundbreaking work regarding your topic. But you do need to become enough of an expert on your topic to translate the research that you have done to an audience that may not have the same background or comfort with concepts and terminology that you have developed in your research. On your topic, you are the expert for your audience's purposes. You should cultivate enough expertise on your topic to bring new insights to .
Workshop at SciTalk '22 on strategic science communication in which we make a strong argument for focusing on behavioral goals and communication objectives as beliefs, feelings, and frames.
All in a Twitter: Using Social Media to Propel Your ScienceBryn Robinson
Using traditional methods of sharing research results - journals, conference presentations - have done an arguably poor job at true knowledge dissemination, both to other researchers and to those outside the field of study. In this presentation, I shared some tips for, and some examples of, increasing awareness and uptake of research results through social media strategies.
This is an updated version of an invited talk I presented at the European Research Council-Brussels (Scientific Seminar): "Love for Science or 'academic prostitution'".
It has been updated to be presented at the Document Freedom Day 2014, during the activities organized by the Oficina de Software Libre de la Universidad de Granada (26th March).
I have included some new slides and revised others.
I present a personal revision (sometimes my own vision) of some issues that I consider key for doing Science. It was focused on the expected audience, mainly Scientific Officers with background in different fields of science and scholarship, but also Agency staff.
Abstract: In a recent Special issue of Nature concerning Science Metrics it was claimed that " Research reverts to a kind of 'academic prostitution' in which work is done to please editors and referees rather than to further knowledge."If this is true, funding agencies should try to avoid falling into the trap of their own system. By perpetuating this 'prostitution' they risk not funding the best research but funding the best sold research.
Given the current epoch of economical crisis, where in a quest for funds researchers are forced into competitive game of pandering to panelists, its seems a good time for deep reflection about the entire scientific system.
With this talk I aim to provoke extra critical thinking among the committees who select evaluators, and among the evaluators, who in turn require critical thinking to the candidates when selecting excellent science.
I will present some initiatives (e.g. new tracers of impact for the Web era- 'altmetrics'), and on-going projects (e.g. how to move from publishing advertising to publishing knowledge), that might enable us to favor Science over marketing.
This set of powerpoint slides summarizes our pilot study examining two altmetric gathering products PlumX (Plum Analytics) with additional information on Altmetric.com (MacMillan). We had Plum Analytics create profiles for several University of Colorado faculty. The faculty provided us with feedback on their social media visibility, or lack of it. The original English presentation is translated into three languages: Russian, Chinese and Japanese.
This is an updated version of an invited talk I presented at the European Research Council-Brussels (Scientific Seminar): "Love for Science or 'academic prostitution'".
It has been updated to be presented at my home institution (Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía - CSIC) in a scientific seminar (14 June 2013).
I have included some new slides and revised others.
I present a personal revision (sometimes my own vision) of some issues that I consider key for doing Science. It was focused on the expected audience, mainly Scientific Officers with background in different fields of science and scholarship, but also Agency staff.
Abstract: In a recent Special issue of Nature concerning Science Metrics it was claimed that " Research reverts to a kind of 'academic prostitution' in which work is done to please editors and referees rather than to further knowledge."If this is true, funding agencies should try to avoid falling into the trap of their own system. By perpetuating this 'prostitution' they risk not funding the best research but funding the best sold research.
Given the current epoch of economical crisis, where in a quest for funds researchers are forced into competitive game of pandering to panelists, its seems a good time for deep reflection about the entire scientific system.
With this talk I aim to provoke extra critical thinking among the committees who select evaluators, and among the evaluators, who in turn require critical thinking to the candidates when selecting excellent science.
I will present some initiatives (e.g. new tracers of impact for the Web era- 'altmetrics'), and on-going projects (e.g. how to move from publishing advertising to publishing knowledge), that might enable us to favor Science over marketing.
Learning Curve: How College Graduates Solve Information Problems in the Workp...Michele Van Hoeck
Findings and recommendations from 2012 Project Information Literacy national study of workplace information literacy. Presented at the 2013 California Conference on Library Instruction.
A presentation to early-career health services researchers about working with institutional communicators, interacting with the media, and using social media to advance their professional careers.
Open Space Session notes: Mapping the Systems of Science and TechnologyKennan Salinero
'Mapping the Systems of Science and Technology: Assessing Tools for Teamwork' represents the next stage in convening critical conversations for the future of science via Yámana Science and Technology's Science 'UnSummit' working conferences. The first were held during the USA Science and Engineering Festival - in 2010 looking at the topic of 'Shifting the Effort/Reward Ratio in Science' and in 2012 'Innovation - a Global Conversation.' We explore current data, successful initiatives and emergent trends from various science and technology oriented domains, in a cross-functional/cross-sector setting. We utilize Open Space sessions, where participants convene discussions around topic areas of greatest interest and urgency to them.
In this PPT the viewer will able to understand the necessity of research. Why it is required, how it is going to helpful to other scholar, scientist, businessman, film maker, industrialist and public. The main purposes of research are to inform action, gather evidence for theories, and contribute to developing knowledge in a field of study.
Portion explained:
Research Is Necessary and Valuable:
1. It's a tool for building knowledge and facilitating learning.
2. It's a means to understand issues and increase public awareness.
3. It helps us succeed in business.
4. It allows us to disprove lies and support truths.
5. It is a means to find, gauge, and seize opportunities.
6. It promotes a love of and confidence in reading, writing, analyzing, and sharing valuable information.
7. It provides nourishment and exercise for the mind.
On the importance of critical thinking skills and how to teach them - presented at the eLearning Consortium of Colorado (eLCC) Conference, April 18, 2014 - Breckenridge, CO
This is a presentation I gave as part of an NIHR masterclass event for its trainees earlier this year. It seemed to go down well and hopefully there are some useful pointers in here for people communicating about health research or science.
Often we believe “if they only understood the facts, they would agree with us.” However, this method only works with a small part of the population. Opinion formation is very complex and includes many other factors besides scientific facts, such as emotion, values, and trust.
Fear-based messaging has been frequently used as an attempt to provide a spark that will lead to further learning and behavioral changes. However, these messages must be coupled with both information and support in order to be effective. Without these two resources, people often suffer from feelings of helplessness, remoteness, and lack of control over the situation which all prevent behavior change from occurring. For more, visit: http://www.extension.org/69114
All in a Twitter: Using Social Media to Propel Your ScienceBryn Robinson
Using traditional methods of sharing research results - journals, conference presentations - have done an arguably poor job at true knowledge dissemination, both to other researchers and to those outside the field of study. In this presentation, I shared some tips for, and some examples of, increasing awareness and uptake of research results through social media strategies.
This is an updated version of an invited talk I presented at the European Research Council-Brussels (Scientific Seminar): "Love for Science or 'academic prostitution'".
It has been updated to be presented at the Document Freedom Day 2014, during the activities organized by the Oficina de Software Libre de la Universidad de Granada (26th March).
I have included some new slides and revised others.
I present a personal revision (sometimes my own vision) of some issues that I consider key for doing Science. It was focused on the expected audience, mainly Scientific Officers with background in different fields of science and scholarship, but also Agency staff.
Abstract: In a recent Special issue of Nature concerning Science Metrics it was claimed that " Research reverts to a kind of 'academic prostitution' in which work is done to please editors and referees rather than to further knowledge."If this is true, funding agencies should try to avoid falling into the trap of their own system. By perpetuating this 'prostitution' they risk not funding the best research but funding the best sold research.
Given the current epoch of economical crisis, where in a quest for funds researchers are forced into competitive game of pandering to panelists, its seems a good time for deep reflection about the entire scientific system.
With this talk I aim to provoke extra critical thinking among the committees who select evaluators, and among the evaluators, who in turn require critical thinking to the candidates when selecting excellent science.
I will present some initiatives (e.g. new tracers of impact for the Web era- 'altmetrics'), and on-going projects (e.g. how to move from publishing advertising to publishing knowledge), that might enable us to favor Science over marketing.
This set of powerpoint slides summarizes our pilot study examining two altmetric gathering products PlumX (Plum Analytics) with additional information on Altmetric.com (MacMillan). We had Plum Analytics create profiles for several University of Colorado faculty. The faculty provided us with feedback on their social media visibility, or lack of it. The original English presentation is translated into three languages: Russian, Chinese and Japanese.
This is an updated version of an invited talk I presented at the European Research Council-Brussels (Scientific Seminar): "Love for Science or 'academic prostitution'".
It has been updated to be presented at my home institution (Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía - CSIC) in a scientific seminar (14 June 2013).
I have included some new slides and revised others.
I present a personal revision (sometimes my own vision) of some issues that I consider key for doing Science. It was focused on the expected audience, mainly Scientific Officers with background in different fields of science and scholarship, but also Agency staff.
Abstract: In a recent Special issue of Nature concerning Science Metrics it was claimed that " Research reverts to a kind of 'academic prostitution' in which work is done to please editors and referees rather than to further knowledge."If this is true, funding agencies should try to avoid falling into the trap of their own system. By perpetuating this 'prostitution' they risk not funding the best research but funding the best sold research.
Given the current epoch of economical crisis, where in a quest for funds researchers are forced into competitive game of pandering to panelists, its seems a good time for deep reflection about the entire scientific system.
With this talk I aim to provoke extra critical thinking among the committees who select evaluators, and among the evaluators, who in turn require critical thinking to the candidates when selecting excellent science.
I will present some initiatives (e.g. new tracers of impact for the Web era- 'altmetrics'), and on-going projects (e.g. how to move from publishing advertising to publishing knowledge), that might enable us to favor Science over marketing.
Learning Curve: How College Graduates Solve Information Problems in the Workp...Michele Van Hoeck
Findings and recommendations from 2012 Project Information Literacy national study of workplace information literacy. Presented at the 2013 California Conference on Library Instruction.
A presentation to early-career health services researchers about working with institutional communicators, interacting with the media, and using social media to advance their professional careers.
Open Space Session notes: Mapping the Systems of Science and TechnologyKennan Salinero
'Mapping the Systems of Science and Technology: Assessing Tools for Teamwork' represents the next stage in convening critical conversations for the future of science via Yámana Science and Technology's Science 'UnSummit' working conferences. The first were held during the USA Science and Engineering Festival - in 2010 looking at the topic of 'Shifting the Effort/Reward Ratio in Science' and in 2012 'Innovation - a Global Conversation.' We explore current data, successful initiatives and emergent trends from various science and technology oriented domains, in a cross-functional/cross-sector setting. We utilize Open Space sessions, where participants convene discussions around topic areas of greatest interest and urgency to them.
In this PPT the viewer will able to understand the necessity of research. Why it is required, how it is going to helpful to other scholar, scientist, businessman, film maker, industrialist and public. The main purposes of research are to inform action, gather evidence for theories, and contribute to developing knowledge in a field of study.
Portion explained:
Research Is Necessary and Valuable:
1. It's a tool for building knowledge and facilitating learning.
2. It's a means to understand issues and increase public awareness.
3. It helps us succeed in business.
4. It allows us to disprove lies and support truths.
5. It is a means to find, gauge, and seize opportunities.
6. It promotes a love of and confidence in reading, writing, analyzing, and sharing valuable information.
7. It provides nourishment and exercise for the mind.
On the importance of critical thinking skills and how to teach them - presented at the eLearning Consortium of Colorado (eLCC) Conference, April 18, 2014 - Breckenridge, CO
This is a presentation I gave as part of an NIHR masterclass event for its trainees earlier this year. It seemed to go down well and hopefully there are some useful pointers in here for people communicating about health research or science.
Often we believe “if they only understood the facts, they would agree with us.” However, this method only works with a small part of the population. Opinion formation is very complex and includes many other factors besides scientific facts, such as emotion, values, and trust.
Fear-based messaging has been frequently used as an attempt to provide a spark that will lead to further learning and behavioral changes. However, these messages must be coupled with both information and support in order to be effective. Without these two resources, people often suffer from feelings of helplessness, remoteness, and lack of control over the situation which all prevent behavior change from occurring. For more, visit: http://www.extension.org/69114
Similar to Steps to Building Your Own Science Communication Platform (20)
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayAADYARAJPANDEY1
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Steps to Building Your Own Science Communication Platform
1. Steps to Building Your Own Sci-Comm Platform
Maryse Thomas
Director, Useful Science
PhD Candidate, McGill University
2. Usefulness
Accuracy
The “usefulness” curve in scientific reporting
Bad reporting,
sensationalized
headlines
Primary research
articles
Pop
science Press
releases
Sweet
spot
3. Lecturing
Telling facts
Debunking
Painting science as
detached & objective
Ridicule
Pointing out what
someone needs to change
Asking questions
Storytelling
Explaining
Revealing the human and
emotional side of science
Empathy
Finding out what someone
wants to change
PNAS2017
Slate
4. Recommended reading
• “Accurate science or accessible science in the media: Why not both?” Jackson,
Mahar, Altosaar & Gaultois, The Conversation
• “Opinion: Finding the plot in science storytelling in hopes of enhancing science
communication” Martinez-Conde & Macknick, PNAS 2017
• “Narrative Style Influences Citation Frequency in Climate Change Science” Hillier,
Kelly, & Klinger, PLOS ONE 2016
• “Communicating the science of climate change” Somerville & Hassol, Physics Today
2011
• “Exaggerations and Caveats in Press Releases and Health-Related Science News”
Sumner et al., PLOS ONE 2016
• “The association between exaggeration in health related science news and
academic press releases: retrospective observational study” Sumner et al., BMJ,
2014
5. 8 steps to building a sci-comm platform
1. Find an unmet need
2. Determine your audience
3. Choose a format and communication style
4. Set goals and include measures to evaluate them
5. Build a team
6. Engage with social media
7. Seek collaborations
8. Make real-world connections
6. 1. Find an unmet need
Usefulness
Accuracy
Sweet
spot
DIVERSITY
INCLUSIVITY
ACCESSIBILITY
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
7. 2. Determine your audience
Practice active listening and qualitative/motivational interviewing
Students Lay public Scientists Policymakers
8. 3. Choose a format and communication style
Written Audio Video
Data-driven Illustrated
What expertise will
you need?
And how can you use
storytelling in each?
9. Some brief podcast tips
• Get a good microphone!
• Be consistent
• Invest time in developing
relevant skills
Radiolab’s Story Board
Resources
Cast (free to try)
Simplecast (Hosting)
10. 4. Set goals and include measures to evaluate them
• # of people reached?
• # publications?
• $ raised?
• # of people trained?
*If your goal is to start a business or be profitable, look for advice
outside of academia: startup accelerators/incubators
11. 5. Build a team
Non-selective model:
Say yes to everyone
Selective model:
Employ a stringent
selection process
Journalism model:
Contributors pitch ideas
that can be accepted or
rejected
Number of
permanent
contributors
Time spent
Recruiting/
onboarding
Time spent
managing
Retention
rate
12. 5. Build a team – and show them your gratitude
• Offer opportunities for recognition
• Offer opportunities to develop new skills
• Letters of recommendation
• Ask for their feedback – and act on it
13. 6. Engage with
social media
#scicomm, #phdchat,
#PhDSupport, #AcademicTwitter,
#MarginSci, #FirstgenSTEM,
#WomenInSTEM
@iamscicomm, @realscientists,
@biotweeps
15. 8. Make real-world connections
Attend or organize: Networking sessions, Community activities,
Workshops, Training sessions, Meetups, Conferences
You never know who is going to be in the audience!
Spell Your Science Workshop, McGill 2018 FORCE2018 Conference, Montreal
16. Free online tools
Project management
• Trello, Airtable
• Slack, Google Groups
Merchandise/Profits
• Threadless, Redbubble
• Patreon
Finding contributors
• SciComm Board, Idealist
Website
• Google Analytics & Search Console
• Wufoo (contact forms)
Social media and marketing
• Tweetdeck, Buffer, Mailchimp
• Canva (Design tool)
• Unsplash, Pexels, Pixabay (No-strings
attached stock photos)