Stakeholder Feedback Data 
Document
MCSchool collects 
stakeholders’ perspectives 
utilizing AdvancEd surveys 
and the SWOT analysis
AdvancEd surveys 
* Administered with fidelity since 2012-2013 in November and 
December 
* Elementary and MS/HS students complete surveys in school. 
* Spanish speaking staff completes the survey in the 
computer lab, translation is offered. 
* Parents are encouraged to complete surveys through email 
and print communications. 
Stakeholders 
2012-2013 
Responses 
2013-2014 
Responses 
Parents 81 (24%) 104 (31%) 
Elementary 
64 (62%) 98 (92%) 
Students 
MS-HS Students 201 (89%) 192 (91%) 
Staff 42 (47%) 55 (63%)
SWOT Analysis 
* Involves all stakeholder groups (parents, students, 
administrators, academic and maintenance staff) 
* Determines strengths, weaknesses, opportunities 
and threats in the areas of pedagogical process, 
school personnel, family and community, and 
administrative processes 
* Parents and students active participation in the 
SWOT analysis remains a challenge
AdvancEd surveys 2013-2014 
Highest level of satisfaction 
Population 
taking the 
survey 
Highest scored 
standard 
(average 
responses) 
Highest scored items in the overall 
survey/Standard 
Elementary 
students 
Purpose and 
direction 
(overall rating 
2.9 on a 3 point 
point scale) 
Computers that help me learn 
/Resources and Support Systems 
Teachers want me to do my 
best/Governance and Leadership 
MS/HS 
students 
Governance and 
and Leadership 
Leadership 
(overall rating 
3.58 on a 5 
point scale) 
All my teachers use projects, 
presentations…to check my 
understanding…/Teaching and 
assessing for learning 
Principals and teachers have high 
high expectations/Governance and 
and Leadership
AdvancEd surveys 2013-2014 
Highest level of satisfaction 
Population 
taking the 
survey 
Highest scored 
standard 
Highest responses in the overall 
survey/Standard 
Parents Purpose and 
direction 
(overall rating 
4.10 on a 5 
point scale) 
Our school provides a safe learning 
learning environment/Resources 
and Support Systems 
School statement focused in 
student success/Purpose and 
Direction 
Staff Purpose and 
direction 
(overall rating 
4.21 on a 5 
point scale) 
School statement focused in 
student success/Purpose and 
Direction 
School provides qualified staff 
members to support student 
learning/Resources and Support 
systems
AdvancEd surveys 
Area showing a trend toward increasing stakeholder satisfaction 
2102-2013 2013-2014 
Population 
taking the 
survey 
Area Indicators that showed increase in 
stakeholder satisfaction 
Elementary 
y students 
• Teaching and 
Assessing for 
Learning 
• My teachers tell me how I should 
behave and do my work, ask my family 
family to come to school, ask me what I 
what I think about school (as well as my 
my principal), care about students 
Staff • Governance and 
Leadership 
• Teaching and 
Assessing for 
Learning 
• Resources and 
Support Systems 
• Leaders support collaborative culture, 
culture, expect staff holds students to 
to highest standards, accountability, 
feedback to improve student learning, 
learning, evaluative staff 
• Teachers personalize interventions, 
student collaboration, instructional 
resources, inform students of 
expectations, feedback to students, use 
use of assessments, support services, 
advocates for students 
• Instructional time and resources, variety 
variety of information resources
AdvancEd surveys 
Area showing a trend toward increasing stakeholder satisfaction 
2102-2013 2013-2014 
Population 
taking the 
survey 
Area Indicators that showed increase in 
stakeholder satisfaction 
Parents • Teaching and 
Assessing for Learning 
Learning 
• Resources and Support 
Support Systems 
• Using results for 
continuous 
improvement 
• My child sees a relationship between 
between what is being taught and his 
his everyday life and has advocates in 
advocates in the school 
• Safe learning environment, effective 
effective use of financial resources 
• Administrators and teachers that 
inform me of my child’s learning 
progress 
MS/HS 
students 
• Purpose and direction 
direction 
• Governance and 
Leadership 
• Resources and Support 
Support Systems 
• Using results for 
continuous 
improvement 
• Programs are available to help me 
succeed 
• Rules are applied equally/principals 
equally/principals and teachers have 
have high expectations of me 
• Variety of resources are available to 
to help me succeed 
• My school shares information about 
about school success with my family 
family and community members
SWOT Analysis 2013 
Strengths 
- Qualified, trained academic 
staff 
- Resources availability 
- Appropriate safe learning 
environment in the classrooms 
- Family environment 
- Open communication 
Opportunities 
- Training for staff 
- Participation of the school in 
in challenging academic 
opportunities such as Model 
Un and Junior Achievement 
- Use of Social Media 
Weaknesses 
- Need of an ESL program 
- AP courses offer only in 
Spanish 
- Library 
- Grade level subjects 
- Opportunities to address high 
achieving/low achieving 
students’ needs. 
Threats 
- Race in fees 
- School location and limited 
space for parking 
- Parents’ awareness of school 
school financial investments.
Consistent findings in stakeholder feedback 
sources (High level of satisfaction) 
SWOT AdvanEd surveys 
School counts with qualified 
and trained academic staff 
to support student learning 
Findings from Resource 
and Support Systems 
Section 
4.1. Qualified professional 
and support staff are 
sufficient in number to fulfill 
their roles and 
responsibilities 
necessary to support the 
school's purpose, direction, 
and the educational 
program (Parent- 4.17, 
Staff - 4.42).
Consistent findings in stakeholder feedback 
sources 
SWOT AdvanEd surveys 
School's 
availability of 
resources 
Findings from Resource 
and Support Systems Section 
Elementary students My school has 
computers to help me learn (2.94 in a 3 
point scale). 
MS-HS students In my school, a variety of 
resources are available to help me succeed 
Parents Our school provides an adequate 
supply of learning resources that are 
current and in good condition (4.05) 
Staff Our school provides sufficient material 
resources to meet students' needs. (4.28)
Consistent findings in stakeholder feedback 
sources 
SWOT AdvanEd surveys 
Appropriate, safe 
learning 
environment to 
support student 
needs 
Elementary Students: My school is 
safe and clean (2.81) 
MS/HS Students: In my school, the 
building and grounds are safe, clean, 
and provide a healthy place for 
learning (3.43) 
Parents: Our school provides a safe 
learning environment (4.37) 
Staff: Our school maintains facilities 
that contribute to a safe environment 
(4.11)
Consistent findings in stakeholder feedback 
sources 
SWOT AdvanEd surveys 
Family 
involvement 
Elementary School: My teachers ask 
my family to come to school activities 
(2.75) 
MS/HS students: My school offers 
opportunities for my family to become 
involved in school activities and my 
learning (3.97) 
Parent: Our school provides 
opportunities for stakeholders to be 
involved in the school (4.1) 
Staff: Our school's leaders engage 
effectively with all stakeholders about 
the school's purpose and direction 
(4.02)
Staff and parents averaged responses 
are above 3.5 in a 5 point scale. 
Elementary students responses are 
above 2.3 in a 3 point scale for the 
2013-2014 administration of the survey. 
It is important to highlight that 
the ”lowest” scores are within the 
average range in the overall profile.
2.55 2.6 2.65 2.7 2.75 2.8 2.85 2.9 2.95 3 
2.94 
2.73 
2.82 
2.9 
2.71 
2.91 
2.7 
2.82 
2.84 
2.69 
Elementary School 
Elementary School 
Elementary School 
Elementary School 
Elementary School 
Purpose 
and 
Direction 
Governan 
ce and 
Leadershi 
p 
Teaching 
and 
Assesing 
for 
Learning 
Resources 
and 
Support 
System 
Using 
Results for 
Continuou 
s 
Improvem 
ent 
Comparative Analysis per Section Elementary School 
2012-2013, 2013-2014 
2012-2013 2013-2014
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 
3.6 
4.39 
4.22 
3.54 
4.11 
4.15 
3.66 
3.91 
4 
3.55 
4.2 
4.13 
3.44 
3.94 
4.06 
3.52 
4.31 
4.1 
3.58 
4.17 
3.99 
3.52 
3.87 
3.92 
3.46 
4.18 
4.06 
3.4 
3.88 
4.04 
MS/HS Students School 
Staff 
Parents 
MS/HS Students School 
Staff 
Parents 
MS/HS Students School 
Staff 
Parents 
MS/HS Students School 
Staff 
Parents 
MS/HS Students School 
Staff 
Parents 
Purpose and 
Direction 
Governance and 
Leadership 
Teaching and 
Assesing for 
Learning 
Resources and 
Support System 
Using Results for 
Continuous 
Improvement 
Comparative Analysis per Section MS/ HS Students, Staff and Parents 
2012-2013, 2013-2014 
2012-2013 2013-2014
AdvancEd surveys 2013-2014 
Lowest level of satisfaction 
The areas that indicated the lowest level of 
satisfaction in the school year 2013-2014 are: 
• Using Results for Continuous Improvement in 
survey results from Elementary Students (2.69 
on a 3 point scale) and MS-HS Students (3.4 
on a five point scale). 
• Teaching and Assessing for Learning in survey 
responses from Parents (3.92) and Staff (3.87).
AdvancEd surveys 
Areas showing a decrease in stakeholder satisfaction 2102- 
2013 2013-2014 
Comparative data for 2012-2013 and 
2013-2014 survey results demonstrated 
a slight decrease in all sections of the 
survey, except for Governance and 
Leadership in the Staff and MS/HS 
Survey. The area with the highest 
decrease is Governance and Leadership 
in Parent Survey results
Consistent findings in stakeholder feedback 
sources (low level of satisfaction) 
SWOT AdvanEd surveys 
Addressing students' 
individual 
learning needs (need of an 
ESL program; AP courses 
offering, Grade level 
subjects). 
Staff: In our school, all staff member 
use student data to address the 
unique learning needs of all students 
(3.52). 
Middle school and High School 
students indicate that: All of my 
teachers change their teaching to 
meet my learning needs (2.57), 
which 
decreased compared to the year 
before. 
Parent: All of my child's teachers 
meet his or her learning needs by 
individualized instruction decreasing 
as well.
Taking into account these responses, the school will continue making 
efforts to meet students learning needs using student performance data 
results. Some of the actions taken so far include: 
O The implementation of a BYOD program 
O Providing access to a variety of relevant digital content 
O Collecting and summarizing student performance data from MAP 
and Stanford 10 tests. The technology coordinator and MAP 
coordinator guided this process. The data collected was presented 
and discussed in data analysis sessions in which Math and Literature 
teachers, principals, psychologists, and counselors participated. 
O Addressing students’ needs through electives and the Academic 
Intervention Program 
O Offering school support program 
O Offering AP courses 
O Providing professional development opportunities for the evaluation, 
interpretation, and use of data 
O Engaging students in goal setting activities 
O Publicizing academic goals in the classrooms 
O Presenting performance results to all stakeholders
Based on AdvancED survey results the only 
stakeholders that rated items below 3 in 
average were the MS-HS students. 
Stakeholders were involved in a thorough 
analysis of survey results and actions for 
improvement were proposed. 
The School Quality Council considered the 
following as areas in need of immediate 
improvement:
Area Lowest scored 
items from all 
surveys 
Goal Actions to be taken 
to improve these 
perceptions. 
Teaching 
and 
Assessin 
g for 
Learning 
All of my 
teachers change 
their teaching to 
meet learning 
needs (MS/HS 
survey 2.88/5) 
Ensure 
teachers 
change their 
teaching to 
meet 
students 
learning 
needs. 
Use student data 
from formative and 
summative 
assessments to 
differentiate 
instruction in the 
classrooms and 
ensure Principals 
follow up teachers' 
lesson plan and 
instructional 
practices through 
constant supervision 
and coaching.
Area Lowest scored 
items from all 
surveys 
Goal Actions to be taken to 
improve these 
perceptions. 
Resources 
and 
Support 
Systems 
In my school, 
students 
respect the 
property of 
others (MS/HS 
survey 2.63/5) 
In my 
school, 
students 
respect the 
property of 
others. 
Students will keep personal 
items in their lockers. 
Principals and teachers will 
ensure personal items are 
not left in the hallways or in 
the classrooms without 
supervision. 
Work on the Value 
Program of the school 
consistently, emphasizing 
the aspects of respecting 
others’ properties, as well 
as being responsible of 
taking care of own 
belongings. 
Students reflect of their 
actions and carry out the 
Acceptable Use Policy for 
the devices
Area Lowest scored 
items from all 
surveys 
Goal Actions to be taken to 
improve these 
perceptions. 
Using results 
for 
continuous 
Improvement 
My school 
considers 
students' 
opinions when 
planning ways 
to improve the 
school (MS/HS 
survey 2.83/5) 
My school 
considers 
students' 
opinions 
when 
planning 
ways to 
improve 
the 
school. 
Ensure the MS/HS 
principal 
communicates in a 
timely manner and 
offer pertinent 
feedback to the 
population he/she 
addresses. Make 
students aware of the 
decisions made in the 
school connected to 
their suggestions and 
opinions for 
improvement
Stakeholder feedback data

Stakeholder feedback data

  • 1.
  • 2.
    MCSchool collects stakeholders’perspectives utilizing AdvancEd surveys and the SWOT analysis
  • 3.
    AdvancEd surveys *Administered with fidelity since 2012-2013 in November and December * Elementary and MS/HS students complete surveys in school. * Spanish speaking staff completes the survey in the computer lab, translation is offered. * Parents are encouraged to complete surveys through email and print communications. Stakeholders 2012-2013 Responses 2013-2014 Responses Parents 81 (24%) 104 (31%) Elementary 64 (62%) 98 (92%) Students MS-HS Students 201 (89%) 192 (91%) Staff 42 (47%) 55 (63%)
  • 4.
    SWOT Analysis *Involves all stakeholder groups (parents, students, administrators, academic and maintenance staff) * Determines strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the areas of pedagogical process, school personnel, family and community, and administrative processes * Parents and students active participation in the SWOT analysis remains a challenge
  • 5.
    AdvancEd surveys 2013-2014 Highest level of satisfaction Population taking the survey Highest scored standard (average responses) Highest scored items in the overall survey/Standard Elementary students Purpose and direction (overall rating 2.9 on a 3 point point scale) Computers that help me learn /Resources and Support Systems Teachers want me to do my best/Governance and Leadership MS/HS students Governance and and Leadership Leadership (overall rating 3.58 on a 5 point scale) All my teachers use projects, presentations…to check my understanding…/Teaching and assessing for learning Principals and teachers have high high expectations/Governance and and Leadership
  • 6.
    AdvancEd surveys 2013-2014 Highest level of satisfaction Population taking the survey Highest scored standard Highest responses in the overall survey/Standard Parents Purpose and direction (overall rating 4.10 on a 5 point scale) Our school provides a safe learning learning environment/Resources and Support Systems School statement focused in student success/Purpose and Direction Staff Purpose and direction (overall rating 4.21 on a 5 point scale) School statement focused in student success/Purpose and Direction School provides qualified staff members to support student learning/Resources and Support systems
  • 7.
    AdvancEd surveys Areashowing a trend toward increasing stakeholder satisfaction 2102-2013 2013-2014 Population taking the survey Area Indicators that showed increase in stakeholder satisfaction Elementary y students • Teaching and Assessing for Learning • My teachers tell me how I should behave and do my work, ask my family family to come to school, ask me what I what I think about school (as well as my my principal), care about students Staff • Governance and Leadership • Teaching and Assessing for Learning • Resources and Support Systems • Leaders support collaborative culture, culture, expect staff holds students to to highest standards, accountability, feedback to improve student learning, learning, evaluative staff • Teachers personalize interventions, student collaboration, instructional resources, inform students of expectations, feedback to students, use use of assessments, support services, advocates for students • Instructional time and resources, variety variety of information resources
  • 8.
    AdvancEd surveys Areashowing a trend toward increasing stakeholder satisfaction 2102-2013 2013-2014 Population taking the survey Area Indicators that showed increase in stakeholder satisfaction Parents • Teaching and Assessing for Learning Learning • Resources and Support Support Systems • Using results for continuous improvement • My child sees a relationship between between what is being taught and his his everyday life and has advocates in advocates in the school • Safe learning environment, effective effective use of financial resources • Administrators and teachers that inform me of my child’s learning progress MS/HS students • Purpose and direction direction • Governance and Leadership • Resources and Support Support Systems • Using results for continuous improvement • Programs are available to help me succeed • Rules are applied equally/principals equally/principals and teachers have have high expectations of me • Variety of resources are available to to help me succeed • My school shares information about about school success with my family family and community members
  • 9.
    SWOT Analysis 2013 Strengths - Qualified, trained academic staff - Resources availability - Appropriate safe learning environment in the classrooms - Family environment - Open communication Opportunities - Training for staff - Participation of the school in in challenging academic opportunities such as Model Un and Junior Achievement - Use of Social Media Weaknesses - Need of an ESL program - AP courses offer only in Spanish - Library - Grade level subjects - Opportunities to address high achieving/low achieving students’ needs. Threats - Race in fees - School location and limited space for parking - Parents’ awareness of school school financial investments.
  • 10.
    Consistent findings instakeholder feedback sources (High level of satisfaction) SWOT AdvanEd surveys School counts with qualified and trained academic staff to support student learning Findings from Resource and Support Systems Section 4.1. Qualified professional and support staff are sufficient in number to fulfill their roles and responsibilities necessary to support the school's purpose, direction, and the educational program (Parent- 4.17, Staff - 4.42).
  • 11.
    Consistent findings instakeholder feedback sources SWOT AdvanEd surveys School's availability of resources Findings from Resource and Support Systems Section Elementary students My school has computers to help me learn (2.94 in a 3 point scale). MS-HS students In my school, a variety of resources are available to help me succeed Parents Our school provides an adequate supply of learning resources that are current and in good condition (4.05) Staff Our school provides sufficient material resources to meet students' needs. (4.28)
  • 12.
    Consistent findings instakeholder feedback sources SWOT AdvanEd surveys Appropriate, safe learning environment to support student needs Elementary Students: My school is safe and clean (2.81) MS/HS Students: In my school, the building and grounds are safe, clean, and provide a healthy place for learning (3.43) Parents: Our school provides a safe learning environment (4.37) Staff: Our school maintains facilities that contribute to a safe environment (4.11)
  • 13.
    Consistent findings instakeholder feedback sources SWOT AdvanEd surveys Family involvement Elementary School: My teachers ask my family to come to school activities (2.75) MS/HS students: My school offers opportunities for my family to become involved in school activities and my learning (3.97) Parent: Our school provides opportunities for stakeholders to be involved in the school (4.1) Staff: Our school's leaders engage effectively with all stakeholders about the school's purpose and direction (4.02)
  • 14.
    Staff and parentsaveraged responses are above 3.5 in a 5 point scale. Elementary students responses are above 2.3 in a 3 point scale for the 2013-2014 administration of the survey. It is important to highlight that the ”lowest” scores are within the average range in the overall profile.
  • 15.
    2.55 2.6 2.652.7 2.75 2.8 2.85 2.9 2.95 3 2.94 2.73 2.82 2.9 2.71 2.91 2.7 2.82 2.84 2.69 Elementary School Elementary School Elementary School Elementary School Elementary School Purpose and Direction Governan ce and Leadershi p Teaching and Assesing for Learning Resources and Support System Using Results for Continuou s Improvem ent Comparative Analysis per Section Elementary School 2012-2013, 2013-2014 2012-2013 2013-2014
  • 16.
    0 0.5 11.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 3.6 4.39 4.22 3.54 4.11 4.15 3.66 3.91 4 3.55 4.2 4.13 3.44 3.94 4.06 3.52 4.31 4.1 3.58 4.17 3.99 3.52 3.87 3.92 3.46 4.18 4.06 3.4 3.88 4.04 MS/HS Students School Staff Parents MS/HS Students School Staff Parents MS/HS Students School Staff Parents MS/HS Students School Staff Parents MS/HS Students School Staff Parents Purpose and Direction Governance and Leadership Teaching and Assesing for Learning Resources and Support System Using Results for Continuous Improvement Comparative Analysis per Section MS/ HS Students, Staff and Parents 2012-2013, 2013-2014 2012-2013 2013-2014
  • 17.
    AdvancEd surveys 2013-2014 Lowest level of satisfaction The areas that indicated the lowest level of satisfaction in the school year 2013-2014 are: • Using Results for Continuous Improvement in survey results from Elementary Students (2.69 on a 3 point scale) and MS-HS Students (3.4 on a five point scale). • Teaching and Assessing for Learning in survey responses from Parents (3.92) and Staff (3.87).
  • 18.
    AdvancEd surveys Areasshowing a decrease in stakeholder satisfaction 2102- 2013 2013-2014 Comparative data for 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 survey results demonstrated a slight decrease in all sections of the survey, except for Governance and Leadership in the Staff and MS/HS Survey. The area with the highest decrease is Governance and Leadership in Parent Survey results
  • 19.
    Consistent findings instakeholder feedback sources (low level of satisfaction) SWOT AdvanEd surveys Addressing students' individual learning needs (need of an ESL program; AP courses offering, Grade level subjects). Staff: In our school, all staff member use student data to address the unique learning needs of all students (3.52). Middle school and High School students indicate that: All of my teachers change their teaching to meet my learning needs (2.57), which decreased compared to the year before. Parent: All of my child's teachers meet his or her learning needs by individualized instruction decreasing as well.
  • 20.
    Taking into accountthese responses, the school will continue making efforts to meet students learning needs using student performance data results. Some of the actions taken so far include: O The implementation of a BYOD program O Providing access to a variety of relevant digital content O Collecting and summarizing student performance data from MAP and Stanford 10 tests. The technology coordinator and MAP coordinator guided this process. The data collected was presented and discussed in data analysis sessions in which Math and Literature teachers, principals, psychologists, and counselors participated. O Addressing students’ needs through electives and the Academic Intervention Program O Offering school support program O Offering AP courses O Providing professional development opportunities for the evaluation, interpretation, and use of data O Engaging students in goal setting activities O Publicizing academic goals in the classrooms O Presenting performance results to all stakeholders
  • 21.
    Based on AdvancEDsurvey results the only stakeholders that rated items below 3 in average were the MS-HS students. Stakeholders were involved in a thorough analysis of survey results and actions for improvement were proposed. The School Quality Council considered the following as areas in need of immediate improvement:
  • 22.
    Area Lowest scored items from all surveys Goal Actions to be taken to improve these perceptions. Teaching and Assessin g for Learning All of my teachers change their teaching to meet learning needs (MS/HS survey 2.88/5) Ensure teachers change their teaching to meet students learning needs. Use student data from formative and summative assessments to differentiate instruction in the classrooms and ensure Principals follow up teachers' lesson plan and instructional practices through constant supervision and coaching.
  • 23.
    Area Lowest scored items from all surveys Goal Actions to be taken to improve these perceptions. Resources and Support Systems In my school, students respect the property of others (MS/HS survey 2.63/5) In my school, students respect the property of others. Students will keep personal items in their lockers. Principals and teachers will ensure personal items are not left in the hallways or in the classrooms without supervision. Work on the Value Program of the school consistently, emphasizing the aspects of respecting others’ properties, as well as being responsible of taking care of own belongings. Students reflect of their actions and carry out the Acceptable Use Policy for the devices
  • 24.
    Area Lowest scored items from all surveys Goal Actions to be taken to improve these perceptions. Using results for continuous Improvement My school considers students' opinions when planning ways to improve the school (MS/HS survey 2.83/5) My school considers students' opinions when planning ways to improve the school. Ensure the MS/HS principal communicates in a timely manner and offer pertinent feedback to the population he/she addresses. Make students aware of the decisions made in the school connected to their suggestions and opinions for improvement