This presentation focuses on preparing school leaders to use data-driven decision making to improve student achievement. It discusses Miami-Dade County Public Schools' journey toward excellence using criteria like Baldrige/Sterling, which has led to strengths in leadership, planning, and student focus, but opportunities remain in using data for analysis, management, and performance results. The presentation also covers tools and strategies for data-driven decision making, including choosing appropriate analysis methods matched to learning targets and subjects.
Electronic copy of my final paper for my capstone presentation. Below is a copy of the introduction:
Post-observation conferences between administrators and teachers are widely used in K-12 to promote teachers’ reflection on their instruction, and in turn, improvement in instructional effectiveness. Scholars have examined how these conversations derive from pedagogical references, professional development structures, and supervision philosophies (Leonard, 2002; Sparks, 2002; Zepeda, 2017). When examining observation data, the distribution of ratings and feedback to teachers is generally “effective or highly effective” (Weisberg et al., 2009; Cohen and Goldhaber, 2016). However, tension persists in the value of using these for accountability, while also facilitating instructional conversations. In relation to other data metrics used in schools (i.e. CCRPI, student assessment outcomes, etc.), the ratings do not align.
This paper grapples with that tension to examine the following research questions: 1) How does GA state policy dictate instructional conversations during post-observation conferences between administrators and teachers at Decatur High School? 2) How can administrators and teachers at Decatur High School use the Teacher Keys Effectiveness System (TKES) to promote instructional improvement? By reflecting on these questions through state policy and participant survey data, the paper’s outcome is to improve instructional practices in K-12 classrooms at Decatur High School.
References (listed in the introduction):
Cohen, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2016). Building a More Complete Understanding of Teacher Evaluation Using Classroom Observations. Educational Researcher, 378-387. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16659442
Leonard, L. J. (2002). Schools as Professional Communities: Addressing the Collaborative Challenge. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(17), 1-13. Retrieved from http://iejll.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/iejll/index.php/ijll/article/view/447
Sparks, D. (2002). Designing Powerful Professional Development for Teachers and Principals. Oxford: National Staff Development Council. Retrieved from http://www.friscoisd.org/ly/departments/professionaldev/documents/designingpowerfulprofessionaldevelopmentforteachersandprincipals_000.pdf
Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Chicago: The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from https://tntp.org/assets/documents/TheWidgetEffect_execsummary_2nd_ed.pdf
Zepeda, S. (2017). Instructional Supervision: Applying Tools and Concepts (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Presentation at uLead 2017 to a full house of colleagues in Banff, April 2017. Looks at what it takes to lead an adaptive and resilient school. Book coming soon!
Electronic copy of my final paper for my capstone presentation. Below is a copy of the introduction:
Post-observation conferences between administrators and teachers are widely used in K-12 to promote teachers’ reflection on their instruction, and in turn, improvement in instructional effectiveness. Scholars have examined how these conversations derive from pedagogical references, professional development structures, and supervision philosophies (Leonard, 2002; Sparks, 2002; Zepeda, 2017). When examining observation data, the distribution of ratings and feedback to teachers is generally “effective or highly effective” (Weisberg et al., 2009; Cohen and Goldhaber, 2016). However, tension persists in the value of using these for accountability, while also facilitating instructional conversations. In relation to other data metrics used in schools (i.e. CCRPI, student assessment outcomes, etc.), the ratings do not align.
This paper grapples with that tension to examine the following research questions: 1) How does GA state policy dictate instructional conversations during post-observation conferences between administrators and teachers at Decatur High School? 2) How can administrators and teachers at Decatur High School use the Teacher Keys Effectiveness System (TKES) to promote instructional improvement? By reflecting on these questions through state policy and participant survey data, the paper’s outcome is to improve instructional practices in K-12 classrooms at Decatur High School.
References (listed in the introduction):
Cohen, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2016). Building a More Complete Understanding of Teacher Evaluation Using Classroom Observations. Educational Researcher, 378-387. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16659442
Leonard, L. J. (2002). Schools as Professional Communities: Addressing the Collaborative Challenge. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(17), 1-13. Retrieved from http://iejll.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/iejll/index.php/ijll/article/view/447
Sparks, D. (2002). Designing Powerful Professional Development for Teachers and Principals. Oxford: National Staff Development Council. Retrieved from http://www.friscoisd.org/ly/departments/professionaldev/documents/designingpowerfulprofessionaldevelopmentforteachersandprincipals_000.pdf
Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Chicago: The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from https://tntp.org/assets/documents/TheWidgetEffect_execsummary_2nd_ed.pdf
Zepeda, S. (2017). Instructional Supervision: Applying Tools and Concepts (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Presentation at uLead 2017 to a full house of colleagues in Banff, April 2017. Looks at what it takes to lead an adaptive and resilient school. Book coming soon!
The Minnesota Mentoring Conference is the region's only annual conference focused exclusively on supporting quality mentoring. This year's theme was "Quality in Action," featuring keynote speaker Andrea Taylor, Ph.D.
Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...Tiffany Brooks
Teacher observations are essential for ensuring that teachers are successfully preparing students for success. Teacher observations should be conducted frequently, and serve as a way for teachers to improve upon their own practices as well as implement new and innovative strategies within’ the classroom. Unfortunately, this is not translated across all education institutions. What is being found is that a lot of schools are either not conducting them frequently and/or properly. This policy memo seeks to address the effects of decreased informative observations, and proposing a few recommendations for improving observation quality at a public charter school in NE, Washington, DC.
So, you want to do work-based learning at your school?Andrew Steinman
Is your district interested in integrating employer-based learning experiences for your high school students? Do you want to start or bring back a work-based learning (WBL) program for your schools? Join us on March 24th from 3-4 PM for a live webinar to hear from local district coordinators and their experiences with WBL. Topics covered include:
- the different types of WBL opportunities;
- key components of a WBL program;
- examples of school-WBL programs in Kent County from local coordinators; and
- must-have resources to get you started in developing your program.
Presentation at the 2011 National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals Conference by
Presenters: Ludmila Battista, Miranda Brand, Julietta Beam, Diana Langton & Sheila Hendricks.
Avoiding the "Velcro Effect" Determining When a Student Requires Paraeducator Support by Patricia H. Mueller, Ed.D. from the 2009 National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals Conference.
Feedback Quotes List - Education - Assessment and Reporting Steven Kolber
A long collated list of quotes from a range of educational researchers, Hattie and Timperley, key edu gurus, key ideas, key definitions and ideas. Teaching Learning, Professional Learning. Useful for PD / PL.
“The dialogue between pupils and teacher should be thoughtful, reflective, focused to evoke and explore understanding, and conducted so that all pupils have an opportunity to think and to express their ideas.” (p 12)
'pupils should be trained in self- assessment so that they can understand the main purposes of their learning and thereby grasp what they need to do to achieve.' (Black & Wiliam, 2010)
Introducing Instructional Coaching as a possible coaching intervention in schools with compelling statistics on the impact of coaching on teachers and students (this was my assignment for my Coaching in Education module).
You’ve got your answer in the first sentence itself! I will simplify it for you: If a school has a name, then it is an outstanding school.
I have seen many ‘outstanding schools’ in Abu Dhabi. I have experienced the same, too. The definition of ‘outstanding’ varies from person to person and time to time. However, when we talk about ‘outstanding schools’ in Abu Dhabi, we tend to think as if there is only one category called ‘outstanding’. Nothing can be farther from reality! Yes, not all outstanding schools are same and that is why there are so many different categories for them.
This is what makes sense: A school can be outstanding for some reasons but not for others. The important thing is to get the right mix for yourself and your child. Yes, the ideal school would be outstanding in every way but that does not exist except perhaps in our dreams. So, look at what you want from a school (for your child) and see where it falls on the scale of importance and whether you agree with its definition of ‘outstanding’ or not.
https://www.westyasacademy.sch.ae/
The Minnesota Mentoring Conference is the region's only annual conference focused exclusively on supporting quality mentoring. This year's theme was "Quality in Action," featuring keynote speaker Andrea Taylor, Ph.D.
Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...Tiffany Brooks
Teacher observations are essential for ensuring that teachers are successfully preparing students for success. Teacher observations should be conducted frequently, and serve as a way for teachers to improve upon their own practices as well as implement new and innovative strategies within’ the classroom. Unfortunately, this is not translated across all education institutions. What is being found is that a lot of schools are either not conducting them frequently and/or properly. This policy memo seeks to address the effects of decreased informative observations, and proposing a few recommendations for improving observation quality at a public charter school in NE, Washington, DC.
So, you want to do work-based learning at your school?Andrew Steinman
Is your district interested in integrating employer-based learning experiences for your high school students? Do you want to start or bring back a work-based learning (WBL) program for your schools? Join us on March 24th from 3-4 PM for a live webinar to hear from local district coordinators and their experiences with WBL. Topics covered include:
- the different types of WBL opportunities;
- key components of a WBL program;
- examples of school-WBL programs in Kent County from local coordinators; and
- must-have resources to get you started in developing your program.
Presentation at the 2011 National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals Conference by
Presenters: Ludmila Battista, Miranda Brand, Julietta Beam, Diana Langton & Sheila Hendricks.
Avoiding the "Velcro Effect" Determining When a Student Requires Paraeducator Support by Patricia H. Mueller, Ed.D. from the 2009 National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals Conference.
Feedback Quotes List - Education - Assessment and Reporting Steven Kolber
A long collated list of quotes from a range of educational researchers, Hattie and Timperley, key edu gurus, key ideas, key definitions and ideas. Teaching Learning, Professional Learning. Useful for PD / PL.
“The dialogue between pupils and teacher should be thoughtful, reflective, focused to evoke and explore understanding, and conducted so that all pupils have an opportunity to think and to express their ideas.” (p 12)
'pupils should be trained in self- assessment so that they can understand the main purposes of their learning and thereby grasp what they need to do to achieve.' (Black & Wiliam, 2010)
Introducing Instructional Coaching as a possible coaching intervention in schools with compelling statistics on the impact of coaching on teachers and students (this was my assignment for my Coaching in Education module).
You’ve got your answer in the first sentence itself! I will simplify it for you: If a school has a name, then it is an outstanding school.
I have seen many ‘outstanding schools’ in Abu Dhabi. I have experienced the same, too. The definition of ‘outstanding’ varies from person to person and time to time. However, when we talk about ‘outstanding schools’ in Abu Dhabi, we tend to think as if there is only one category called ‘outstanding’. Nothing can be farther from reality! Yes, not all outstanding schools are same and that is why there are so many different categories for them.
This is what makes sense: A school can be outstanding for some reasons but not for others. The important thing is to get the right mix for yourself and your child. Yes, the ideal school would be outstanding in every way but that does not exist except perhaps in our dreams. So, look at what you want from a school (for your child) and see where it falls on the scale of importance and whether you agree with its definition of ‘outstanding’ or not.
https://www.westyasacademy.sch.ae/
Restorative Practices to Transform Educational SettingsVickie Sax
Article Review based on “SaferSanerSchools: Transforming School Cultures with Restorative Practices”, Mirsky, L., Reclaiming Children and Youth, vol. 16, number 2, summer 2007, pg 5-12.
Surname3
Student’s name
Professor’s name
Course title
Due Date
Involving stakeholders
Stakeholders are parties with interest in assessment planning. They play a role in the formation, evaluation and implementation of an assessment plan. Stakeholders are either internal or external. Administrators, staff, faculty, students and institutional researchers are the internal stakeholders. The external stakeholders are disciplinary and professional standard bodies, employers and alumni, peer programs and colleges and faculty teaching more advanced courses. Involving stakeholders in assessment is important for organizational decision making (ReferenSuskie). The evidence from the assessment should be used by stakeholders to improve activities, programs or institution for which they are responsible and accountable for. In this case, an academic institution assesses its student in order to improve its academic performance.
The assessment collects data about the student’s background characteristics, educational experiences and student learning in order to determine the consistencies and inconsistencies in their activities or performance. The other stakeholders i.e. staff and disciplinary and professional bodies gather the data using qualitative and quantitative methods and later analyze and interpret the data based on the criterion of performance level set e.g. grammar or creativity of the student. They discuss and vote to determine the best value (Suskie). The external stakeholders are used to bring external information to inform discussions to help develop justifiable benchmarks. The results from the assessment plan are used in planning and implementation process.
Strategies used to ensure stakeholder involvement in the assessment process are as follows: to begin with, the process should give them a sense of ownership. For example, it gives students the means, motive and opportunity to take control of their own learning (Brans Kamp). Moreover, the process should be understandable, relevant and acceptable to the stakeholders. Most importantly the process should align itself to the culture, mission and vision of the institution which they strive to achieve. Furthermore, the assessment plan should recognize their different backgrounds, goals, perceptions and experiences and the influence in their interpretation and decision making. Therefore, the plan should advocate for a culture of openness, trust and commitment to self-examination among different stakeholders.
In conclusion, communication of the implementation plans is important. Communication (oral, written or group meetings) and different dissemination strategies are needed to accommodate different stakeholders. it is important to discuss and seek their reaction in order to deliberate actions to be taken to improve the performance of the academic institution. Stakeholder involvement determines the quality and effectiveness of an assessment and therefore should be involved in the process.
Wo.
Surname3
Student’s name
Professor’s name
Course title
Due Date
Involving stakeholders
Stakeholders are parties with interest in assessment planning. They play a role in the formation, evaluation and implementation of an assessment plan. Stakeholders are either internal or external. Administrators, staff, faculty, students and institutional researchers are the internal stakeholders. The external stakeholders are disciplinary and professional standard bodies, employers and alumni, peer programs and colleges and faculty teaching more advanced courses. Involving stakeholders in assessment is important for organizational decision making (ReferenSuskie). The evidence from the assessment should be used by stakeholders to improve activities, programs or institution for which they are responsible and accountable for. In this case, an academic institution assesses its student in order to improve its academic performance.
The assessment collects data about the student’s background characteristics, educational experiences and student learning in order to determine the consistencies and inconsistencies in their activities or performance. The other stakeholders i.e. staff and disciplinary and professional bodies gather the data using qualitative and quantitative methods and later analyze and interpret the data based on the criterion of performance level set e.g. grammar or creativity of the student. They discuss and vote to determine the best value (Suskie). The external stakeholders are used to bring external information to inform discussions to help develop justifiable benchmarks. The results from the assessment plan are used in planning and implementation process.
Strategies used to ensure stakeholder involvement in the assessment process are as follows: to begin with, the process should give them a sense of ownership. For example, it gives students the means, motive and opportunity to take control of their own learning (Brans Kamp). Moreover, the process should be understandable, relevant and acceptable to the stakeholders. Most importantly the process should align itself to the culture, mission and vision of the institution which they strive to achieve. Furthermore, the assessment plan should recognize their different backgrounds, goals, perceptions and experiences and the influence in their interpretation and decision making. Therefore, the plan should advocate for a culture of openness, trust and commitment to self-examination among different stakeholders.
In conclusion, communication of the implementation plans is important. Communication (oral, written or group meetings) and different dissemination strategies are needed to accommodate different stakeholders. it is important to discuss and seek their reaction in order to deliberate actions to be taken to improve the performance of the academic institution. Stakeholder involvement determines the quality and effectiveness of an assessment and therefore should be involved in the process.
Wo.
MO SW-PBS Summer Institute 2009 Keynote by Dr. Tim LewisNanci Johnson
Dr Tim Lewis' Keynote "Are We There Yet?", for the Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support Summer Institute 2009. Discussion of key features in school and districwide SW-PBS implementation as well as information regarding the dissemination of SW-PBS in the state of Missouri.
Through its Epicenter software and its partnership with The Institute for Excellence in Education, the National Charter Schools Institute seeks to empower authorizers, charter schools and charter school boards.
Similar to Developing Enhanced Leadership for Data-Driven Schools (Fina (20)
Developing Enhanced Leadership for Data-Driven Schools (Fina
1. Presented by
Dr. Eduardo R. Rivas, Administrative Director
Mr. Carlos A. Viera, Director
Ms. Felicia Mendez, Consultant
2003 Conference Session #1353, Room 256, Moscone Center
Association for Curriculum and Supervision Development
San Francisco, California
Miami-Dade County Public Schools
Miami, Florida
March 8, 2003
3:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
DEVELOPING ENHANCED LEADERSHIP
FOR DATA-DRIVEN SCHOOLS
2. To paraphrase from Henrik IBSEN,
Enemy of the People, 1882,
A (school) community is like a ship:
everyone ought to be prepared to take the
helm.
3. Developing Enhanced Leadership
for Data-Driven Schools
This presentation focuses on preparing individual educational leaders to
develop systematic approaches to data-driven decision making and to employ
interpersonal competencies that will support their efforts to lead schools toward
improved performance in student achievement.
What is the history of performance excellence?
What have we found?
What is research based experiential training?
What are the implications for preparing education leaders for the 21st century?
How can one use the process – Plan Do Study Act?
What is data-driven decision making?
How can one choose an appropriate tool?
What are the lessons learned?
8. Use of an integrated approach to organizational performance that
results in…
1. Delivery of ever-improving value to customers, contributing
to marketplace success;
2. Improvement of overall organizational effectiveness and
capabilities; and
3. Organizational and Personal Learning,
4. Performance Excellence
Reference: The 2003 Sterling Criteria for Organizational Performance
Excellence, The 2002 Florida Sterling Council, Page 29.
10. Sterling Results for Organizational Performance
During the Navigator Site Visit
There are seven categories which are examined during the Navigator
Process. These categories are:
Leadership
Strategies & Planning for School Improvement
Student & Stakeholder Focus
Performance Measurement and Analysis
Faculty and Staff Focus
School Process Management
School Performance Results
11. After the site visit, the visiting team prepares a report which delineates
Strengths and Opportunities For Improvement for each of the seven
categories.
Based on this report, the district prepares an analysis that cites
common areas of Strengths and Opportunities For Improvement for
each of the seven categories. This data is then used as one factor in
the process of determining staff development opportunities that
address school needs.
12. At this time, the district has determined from the data analysis that the
categories of Leadership, Strategies & Planning for School
Improvement, Student & Stakeholder Focus, and Faculty and Staff
Focus have more areas of Strengths.
The categories of Performance Measurement and Analysis, School
Process Management, and School Performance Results have more
areas of Opportunities For Improvement.
The need to use a systematic approach to problem-solving (PDSA)
was also identified.
14. For a work unit to be able to work
through change and consider
opportunities for improvement,
certain conditions need to exist.
15. SUCCESSFUL
CHANGE AGENTS
• Make small, often unnoticed, changes
• Work with the inherent wisdom and energy of
a system, rather than at odds with it
• Act from deeply felt values and system
sensitivity, rather than for economic gain or
personal validation
• Respond to a felt need for a change
• Provide clear benefits for the work and risk of
changing
16. TEN THINGS TO DO ABOUT
RESISTANCE
Acknowledge change as a process
Empower stakeholders
Encourage participation by all stakeholders
Set concrete goals
Show sensitivity to differences among
individuals
17. Communicate openly and use
reflective questioning that helps
stakeholders explore their thinking
Develop strategies for dealing with
emotions
Manage conflict through negotiation
Model process skills and actions
Monitor process dynamics and make
adjustments to ease tensions
TEN THINGS TO DO ABOUT
RESISTANCE
19. CHARACTERISTICS OF
PRODUCTIVE WORKING
ENVIRONMENTS
Supportive administrative leadership,
Opportunities to work collaboratively with others,
Opportunities to use one’s knowledge and skill,
Availability of necessary resources to perform one’s job,
Professional development opportunities, and
Effective communication processes.
Seyfarth (1996)
20. THE RULES
The Basic Rules for Institutional Change,
which is the last page of the separate
packet which was provided to you.
Consider which rule you think would be the
most difficult to implement.
21. Learning how to listen to others,
Getting and giving appropriate feedback,
Recognizing non-verbal communication,
Recognizing that people perceive messages
differently,
Using an approach to resolving conflict through
problem solving, and
Encourages employees to take responsibility for their
own actions.
Effective Communication
22. Provide educators with focused, sustained, and
expanded knowledge of curriculum and pedagogy.
Address the alignment of state standards with
instruction and assessment.
Facilitate creative and critical thinking, problem
solving, effective communication, and information
management.
Develop the ability to give meaningful feedback, learn
how to function as a team member, gather resource,
and be able to act as a change agent.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MUST –
25. “Organizations must refocus their training to include
the limbic (emotional) system. They must help
people break old behavioral habits and establish
new ones. That not only takes much more time than
conventional training programs, it also requires an
individualized approach.”
Daniel Goleman, 1998
26. FINDING FLOW
OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE LEVEL
You are in a state of flow when goals are clear, feedback relevant, and
challenges and skills are in balance, and
Attention can then become ordered, focused, and fully invested.
This total involvement, the FLOW, releases energy which, like sparks, ignite you
and others within your influence and enable you to address the
problem/situation/issue at hand.
If a task or assignment resembles a flow activity, the individual is more involved,
the energy produced is greater, and individuals are at an optimum performance
level.
27. Implications of Flow:
Energy is a direct result of higher interest level.
Creativity is at its highest when FLOW is present.
The quality of life is much improved if we learn to love what we
have to do.
28. Conditions of Flow:
Immediate feedback, commensurate challenges and skills…
How can FLOW affect your educational setting?
Based on your current assignment, how could you create an environment where
there is FLOW?
29. Barriers to FLOW
Lack of attention
Challenge too great
Ambiguous goals
Many distractions
Inconsistent feedback
Inadequate and/or inappropriate skills
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. Finding Flow. New York: Basic Books, 1997.
30. So What?
How would you like your school to:
• Improve student achievement and overall school
performance?
• Accelerate your school improvement efforts and operate
more effectively?
• Improve accountability by identifying common goals and
key measures?
• Exceed state, community, and other stakeholder
expectations?
• Focus on today’s ever-changing competitive educational
environment?
32. Process - PDSA
Plan – How are you going to attack the problem?
How are you going to collect the data?
Do – Implement, collect data.
Study – Analyze the data.
Act – Make decisions based on the data.
Make changes that result in improvement.
36. DATA-DRIVEN
DECISION MAKING
Miami-Dade County Public Schools has produced reports on school characteristics,
FCAT Sunshine State Standards and Norm Referenced Test Content Area Results,
an information clearinghouse, and an individual student detail report.
These materials are found in the packet distributed to you. They have been
numbered so that you can follow along with the description.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools: Summary District wide 2000-2001 Florida
Comprehensive assessment test (FCAT)
School Characteristics
School Climate Survey (Pg 4)
Staff Characteristics (Pg 4)
Student and Educational Program Information (Pg 4)
Student Achievement (Pg 5)
37. FCAT Sunshine State Standards Content Area
Results, Grades 3-5, (Pgs 6-11)
Standard curriculum students and all
curriculum groups
FCAT Norm-Referenced Test Content Area Results,
Grades 3-5, (Pgs 12-17)
Standard curriculum students and all
curriculum groups
FCAT Summary Scores, by class/section (Pgs 18-19)
38. School Performance Accountability Results and School
Performance Grade Trends (Pgs 20-21)
FCAT Sunshine State Standards (Reading and
Mathematics Trends), Grades 3-5 (Pgs 22-26)
FCAT Writing Trends for all students, Grade 4 (Pgs 27-33)
Student Membership Trends (Pgs 34-39)
INFORMATION
CLEARINGHOUSE
40. Normalizing The Data
• Make sure that you are comparing apples
with apples.
– If comparing apples to oranges, make
sure that you can explain why.
• Common playing field
– Make sure that you have transformed the
data into a common level.
• Percents for Numbers
41. CHOOSING AN
ANALYSIS METHOD
• Choose a method that:
Matches the target (of instruction) and
Aligns with the method of instruction.
• Choose tools from a variety of methods based
on a match with the learning target, subject
matter, and utility.
44. A way to provide feedback on a
specific topic being addressed. One
side is the Plus side on which
participants list what they felt worked
well. The other side is the Delta side
on which they write the things that
need to improve.
Used to determine what worked well
and what needs improvement.
+ Plus/Delta Chart
45. Specific Example:
For monitoring student and
stakeholder satisfaction
General Examples:
When determining what worked well
and what needs improvement.
When evaluating a process (lesson,
business unit, activity).
TOOL Plus/Delta Chart – SOME EXAMPLES OF
WHEN IT CAN BE USED
+
46. Flow Chart
A way of graphically
organizing and analyzing
your current processes
Sequence
Components
Cohesiveness
Used to identify potential
areas for improvements
48. Specific Example:
For monitoring safety and security
issues in order to make
improvements to the school’s
safety procedure.
General Examples:
When planning a project.
When better communication is
needed within the group members.
TOOL Flow Chart – SOME EXAMPLES OF
WHEN IT CAN BE USED
49. SCATTER DIAGRAM
• Used to determine
if two (2) variables
have an effect on
each other
– Positive
correlation
– No correlation
– Negative
correlation
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
% Homework Completed Spelling
TestScoresSpelling
1st period 2nd period 3rd period
50. Specific Example:
For comparing the relationship
of a student attendance to the
student’s test scores.
General Examples:
When looking for trends or
change in the average.
When identifying trends during
the data collection phase.
TOOL Scatter Diagram – SOME EXAMPLES OF
WHEN IT CAN BE USED
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
51. Activity
A school in your district received test results
which indicated that students did well in
reading, but the mathematics scores were
considerably lower. Using the PDSA method,
develop a plan of action and select tools for
each stage-PLAN, DO, STUDY, and ACT.
53. LESSONS LEARNED
• Select a process that can work – PDSA
• Use appropriate data in making decisions
• Incorporate Baldrige/Sterling feedback
• Provide training to enable administrators to work
through change
• Involve staff to prepare them to be an integral
part of the process