SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 26
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF SAFETY
ASPECTS – A CASE STUDY

                       DINESH SIVARAM M
                       RAVI MANDAL
ABSTRACT
 It is a common assumption that implementing safety
  norms or following safety rules is expensive and not
  economical.
 But it has been proved in the recent past that
  following safety norms and implementing them is
  actually economic
 Though putting safety precautions in place can be an
  annoyance and an extra expense for an employer, the
  financial benefits can drastically outweigh the costs.

 To bring awareness about the importance of safety
  engineering and Prove the fact that implementation
  and strict following of safety rules will boost the
  economy of the firm by increasing the profit
The International Labour Organization estimates there
  were 47,000 deaths from occupational accidents in
  India in 2003
Safety engineering
Focuses on preventing accident and lessening
  opportunity for human error
The process of designing safety procedures, standards
  and also ensuring that safe environment is
  maintained.
Cost benefit analysis
 A methodology for valuing costs and benefits that
  enables broad comparisons to be made and imposes
  an accounting framework that prescribes classes of
  benefits and costs to consider, means to measure
  them, and approaches for aggregating them.
 Monetary or safety valuation of the risk of
  performing a task vs. benefit of performing the task
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
The costs of accidents incurred by contractors
    Cost of construction health and safety measures
    first aid; machinery; personal protective equipment; safety training;
      investigation etc..,
    Direct costs on insurance; damage to buildings and equipments or vehicles;
     damage to the product; cost of health or expenditure on medical care; cost
     of investigation legal costs; death; permanent disability; worker illness; losses
     of current production
    Indirect Costs.
    May not be covered by insurance
    cleaning up; hire costs of temporary equipment; waste disposal; temporary
     labor costs of advising and consulting experts; lost time, sick pay, overtime
     working and temporary labor; and; loss of business reputation
Calculating simple ROI (cash on cash) for cash flow and investment analysis
Safety softwares

Cost/Benefit Analysis calculator   Cost/Benefit Analysis calculator
Small business safety calculators
Case study -Ritrama
 There is a direct, positive correlation between investment in safety,
   health, and the environment and its subsequent return on
   investment
 As part of their business strategy, to decrease injuries and illness,
   increase profits and help create jobs
 As illnesses, injuries and fatalities decline so to do health care and
   workers compensation costs
 Companies that invest consistently in safety realize positive bottom
   line results, reduced absenteeism, lower turnover rates, higher
   productivity, increased employee morale and a positive brand image
 For every $1 invested in an effective workplace safety program, $4 to
   $6 may be saved as illnesses, injuries and fatalities decline
 Ritrama, a multi-national company with 110 employees at the
   Minneapolis plant, manufactures pressure-sensitive films and labels
   for the automotive, beverage, health, beauty and pharmaceutical
   industries
MNOSHA citations
Develop a leadership/management program, Involve employees in a
   safety and health program Appoint a safety director, form a safety
   committee and develop an implementation plan for it and
   develop a recordkeeping program for injuries and illnesses and
   plan for implementing it.
selected a four-phase plan that included:
 Determining the root causes of the citations;
 Bringing the plant into compliance;
 Establishing a new safety and health program; and
 Ensuring that the above three phases were implemented.
 In addition, they hired an off-site, safety and health consultant
   firm
Consultant found that
 Most injuries were a direct result of the employees' failure to
   follow established safety and health practices.
 Accidents, injuries and near misses were not properly
   investigated.
 The treatment for injured employees was not being followed up
Recordable 1995-2005
                      Text Version:
                       Title: Recordable 1995-2005
                       Type: Vertical Bar Graph
                       Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year
                       showing the number of recordable
                       Values:
                      1995 = 14
                      1996 = 13
                      1997 = 14
                      1998 = 13
                      1999 = 10
                      2000 = 15
                      2001 = 19
                      2002 = 4
                      2003 = 5
                      2004 = 7
                      2005 = 5
                   
Lost Time Cases (1995-2005)
                       Text Version:
                        Title: Lost Time Cases 1995-2005
                        Type: Vertical Bar Graph
                        Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year
                        showing the number of lost time cases
                        Values:
                       1995 = 10
                       1996 = 13
                       1997 = 10
                       1998 = 9
                       1999 = 6
                       2000 = 8
                       2001 = 4
                       2002 = 1
                       2003 = 0
                       2004 = 0
                       2005 = 1
Lost Workdays 1995-2005
                      Title: Lost Workdays 1995-2005
                       Type: Vertical Bar Graph
                       Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year
                       showing the number of lost workdays
                       Values:
                      1995 = 107
                      1996 = 82
                      1997 = 20
                      1998 = 19
                      1999 = 19
                      2000 = 196
                      2001 = 20
                      2002 = 180
                      2003 = 40
                      2004 = 50
                      2005 = 31
Restricted Days 1995-2005
                       Title: Restricted Days 1995-2005
                        Type: Vertical Bar Graph
                        Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year
                        showing the number of restricted days
                        Values:
                       1995 = 269
                       1996 = 189
                       1997 = 214
                       1998 = 105
                       1999 = 161
                       2000 = 69
                       2001 = 266
                       2002 = 0
                       2003 = 11
                       2004 = 0
                       2005 = 0
Average Lost/Restricted Days Per Case
1995-2005
                        Title: Average Lost/Restricted Days Per Case
                         1995-2005
                         Type: Vertical Bar Graph
                         Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year
                         showing the number of restricted days
                         Values:
                        1995 = 38
                        1996 = 21
                        1997 = 23
                        1998 = 14
                        1999 = 30
                        2000 = 33
                        2001 = 72
                        2002 = 180
                        2003 = 6
                        2004 = 0
                        2005 = 0
The Impact
 The $44,000 reduction of workers' compensation premiums
    from 2000 to 2003
   The overall benefits to Ritrama include increased
    productivity and quality of the products;
   The percent of credits and returns to sales went from a high
    of 2.22 percent in 2001 to 1.24 percent in 2006, which when
    translated into sales figures means that from a production
    standpoint, average sales rose 7.5 percent.
   The number of manufacturing defects and amount of waste
    went from $2.7 M in 2001 to $435 K in 2005
   The costs of hiring the Safety Consultant and installing new
    safety equipment have also been recovered
ANGLO AMERICAN MINING COMPANY
 ANGLOW AMERICAN Is the worlds most diversified
    mining company
   commodity mix Like platinum group metals,
    diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, metallurgical and
    thermal coal are mined
   They operate on six continents with 150000
    permanent and contract employees.
   Between the years 2002 to 2007 ANGLO AMERICAN
    SUFFERED CLOSE TO 200 FATALITIES
   In the year 2007 Cynthia Carroll became the CEO of
    the ANGLO AMERICAN COMPANY
    She was dissatisfied with the safety knowledge of
    the supervisors and the managers
   Visited mines and did a research
   A decision was made and the company was shut
    down and was planed that after a perfunctory safety
    check would resume production as soon as possible
RESULT - Below are some of the data’s got from HARVARD
BUSINESS REVIEW)

40000

35000

30000              OPERATIN
                   G INCOME
25000              IN $ US
                   MILLIONS
20000
                   REVENUE
15000              IN $ US
                   MILLIONS
10000

 5000

    0
Cost of accidents
Direct benefits
 costs savings
  saving of time,
   expenditure on medical care
  reduction in the costs of accidents
  reducing insurance premiums;
  reducing litigation costs;
  reducing sick costs;
  improving production
  productivity rates
  lowering accident rates
  reducing material damage
Indirect benefits
 include reducing absenteeism;
 improving corporate images,
 improved job satisfaction,
 reducing sick pay,
 lost time,
 overtime working and clean
The Hidden Cost of Unsafe Behavior –
Running the Numbers
 According to information provided in a report
  by a nationwide insurance
  company, approximately 60% of company
  executives figure that their companies save $3
  for every dollar spent on safety programs. A
  $10,000,000.00 company that spends 1% of
  their budget on safety can figure to save
  approximately $300,000.00. OSHA puts the
  figure to be more

More Related Content

What's hot

M16_MISH1520_06_PPW_C15.ppt
M16_MISH1520_06_PPW_C15.pptM16_MISH1520_06_PPW_C15.ppt
M16_MISH1520_06_PPW_C15.ppt
Rusman Mukhlis
 
Engineering Ramp Operation - PX Marshalling Procedure 2015
Engineering Ramp Operation - PX Marshalling Procedure 2015Engineering Ramp Operation - PX Marshalling Procedure 2015
Engineering Ramp Operation - PX Marshalling Procedure 2015
Andrew Louis
 

What's hot (20)

Loss Control Program Fundamentals
Loss Control Program FundamentalsLoss Control Program Fundamentals
Loss Control Program Fundamentals
 
Safety Tool Box Talk
Safety Tool Box TalkSafety Tool Box Talk
Safety Tool Box Talk
 
Reactive To Predictive 1,2
Reactive To Predictive 1,2Reactive To Predictive 1,2
Reactive To Predictive 1,2
 
Risk assessment principles and guidelines
Risk assessment principles and guidelinesRisk assessment principles and guidelines
Risk assessment principles and guidelines
 
M16_MISH1520_06_PPW_C15.ppt
M16_MISH1520_06_PPW_C15.pptM16_MISH1520_06_PPW_C15.ppt
M16_MISH1520_06_PPW_C15.ppt
 
Safety Management System framework
Safety Management System  frameworkSafety Management System  framework
Safety Management System framework
 
Chapter-4 Time value of money
Chapter-4  Time value of moneyChapter-4  Time value of money
Chapter-4 Time value of money
 
BasicSafe | Famous Safety Quotes to Strengthen Your Safety Culture
BasicSafe | Famous Safety Quotes to Strengthen Your Safety CultureBasicSafe | Famous Safety Quotes to Strengthen Your Safety Culture
BasicSafe | Famous Safety Quotes to Strengthen Your Safety Culture
 
Engineering Ramp Operation - PX Marshalling Procedure 2015
Engineering Ramp Operation - PX Marshalling Procedure 2015Engineering Ramp Operation - PX Marshalling Procedure 2015
Engineering Ramp Operation - PX Marshalling Procedure 2015
 
Ramp safety
Ramp safetyRamp safety
Ramp safety
 
Risk Management Process Steps Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Risk Management Process Steps Powerpoint Presentation SlidesRisk Management Process Steps Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Risk Management Process Steps Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
Operations of air cargo
Operations of air cargoOperations of air cargo
Operations of air cargo
 
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Threat and Error Management in AviationThreat and Error Management in Aviation
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
 
9780273713654 pp04
9780273713654 pp049780273713654 pp04
9780273713654 pp04
 
Risk Weighted Assets and Notes to Accounts
Risk Weighted Assets and Notes to AccountsRisk Weighted Assets and Notes to Accounts
Risk Weighted Assets and Notes to Accounts
 
Avsec policy
Avsec policyAvsec policy
Avsec policy
 
project risk management
project risk managementproject risk management
project risk management
 
Section 6 IATA Marks and Labeling
Section 6   IATA Marks and LabelingSection 6   IATA Marks and Labeling
Section 6 IATA Marks and Labeling
 
Globally Harmonized System
Globally Harmonized SystemGlobally Harmonized System
Globally Harmonized System
 
AIRCRAFT WEIGHT AND BALANCE BASIC FOR LOAD CONTROL
AIRCRAFT WEIGHT AND BALANCE BASIC FOR LOAD CONTROLAIRCRAFT WEIGHT AND BALANCE BASIC FOR LOAD CONTROL
AIRCRAFT WEIGHT AND BALANCE BASIC FOR LOAD CONTROL
 

Viewers also liked

Case Study Immigration Policy Of Canada
Case Study  Immigration Policy Of CanadaCase Study  Immigration Policy Of Canada
Case Study Immigration Policy Of Canada
fiona kane
 
Merger & Acquisition In Banks
Merger & Acquisition In BanksMerger & Acquisition In Banks
Merger & Acquisition In Banks
Robin Kapoor
 
Research assumption
Research assumptionResearch assumption
Research assumption
Nursing Path
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Cost benefit analysis
Cost benefit analysis Cost benefit analysis
Cost benefit analysis
 
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
 
Cost-benefit analysis
Cost-benefit analysisCost-benefit analysis
Cost-benefit analysis
 
Geopolitical approach on greek eez
Geopolitical approach on greek eezGeopolitical approach on greek eez
Geopolitical approach on greek eez
 
Case Study Immigration Policy Of Canada
Case Study  Immigration Policy Of CanadaCase Study  Immigration Policy Of Canada
Case Study Immigration Policy Of Canada
 
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywordslimitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
 
management & leadership (case study)
management & leadership (case study)management & leadership (case study)
management & leadership (case study)
 
Merger & Acquisition In Banks
Merger & Acquisition In BanksMerger & Acquisition In Banks
Merger & Acquisition In Banks
 
Taco Bell
Taco BellTaco Bell
Taco Bell
 
Cost benefit and cost effective analysis
Cost benefit and cost effective analysis Cost benefit and cost effective analysis
Cost benefit and cost effective analysis
 
Assumptions;Scope And Limitations
Assumptions;Scope And LimitationsAssumptions;Scope And Limitations
Assumptions;Scope And Limitations
 
Research assumption
Research assumptionResearch assumption
Research assumption
 
Sample market entry analysis
Sample market entry analysisSample market entry analysis
Sample market entry analysis
 
Chapter 6-THEORETICAL & CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Chapter 6-THEORETICAL & CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKChapter 6-THEORETICAL & CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Chapter 6-THEORETICAL & CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
 

Cost benefit analysis of safety aspects – a case study

  • 1. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF SAFETY ASPECTS – A CASE STUDY DINESH SIVARAM M RAVI MANDAL
  • 2. ABSTRACT  It is a common assumption that implementing safety norms or following safety rules is expensive and not economical.  But it has been proved in the recent past that following safety norms and implementing them is actually economic  Though putting safety precautions in place can be an annoyance and an extra expense for an employer, the financial benefits can drastically outweigh the costs.  To bring awareness about the importance of safety engineering and Prove the fact that implementation and strict following of safety rules will boost the economy of the firm by increasing the profit The International Labour Organization estimates there were 47,000 deaths from occupational accidents in India in 2003
  • 3. Safety engineering Focuses on preventing accident and lessening opportunity for human error The process of designing safety procedures, standards and also ensuring that safe environment is maintained. Cost benefit analysis  A methodology for valuing costs and benefits that enables broad comparisons to be made and imposes an accounting framework that prescribes classes of benefits and costs to consider, means to measure them, and approaches for aggregating them.  Monetary or safety valuation of the risk of performing a task vs. benefit of performing the task
  • 5. The costs of accidents incurred by contractors  Cost of construction health and safety measures first aid; machinery; personal protective equipment; safety training; investigation etc..,  Direct costs on insurance; damage to buildings and equipments or vehicles; damage to the product; cost of health or expenditure on medical care; cost of investigation legal costs; death; permanent disability; worker illness; losses of current production  Indirect Costs. May not be covered by insurance cleaning up; hire costs of temporary equipment; waste disposal; temporary labor costs of advising and consulting experts; lost time, sick pay, overtime working and temporary labor; and; loss of business reputation Calculating simple ROI (cash on cash) for cash flow and investment analysis
  • 6. Safety softwares Cost/Benefit Analysis calculator Cost/Benefit Analysis calculator
  • 7. Small business safety calculators
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14. Case study -Ritrama  There is a direct, positive correlation between investment in safety, health, and the environment and its subsequent return on investment  As part of their business strategy, to decrease injuries and illness, increase profits and help create jobs  As illnesses, injuries and fatalities decline so to do health care and workers compensation costs  Companies that invest consistently in safety realize positive bottom line results, reduced absenteeism, lower turnover rates, higher productivity, increased employee morale and a positive brand image  For every $1 invested in an effective workplace safety program, $4 to $6 may be saved as illnesses, injuries and fatalities decline  Ritrama, a multi-national company with 110 employees at the Minneapolis plant, manufactures pressure-sensitive films and labels for the automotive, beverage, health, beauty and pharmaceutical industries
  • 15. MNOSHA citations Develop a leadership/management program, Involve employees in a safety and health program Appoint a safety director, form a safety committee and develop an implementation plan for it and develop a recordkeeping program for injuries and illnesses and plan for implementing it. selected a four-phase plan that included:  Determining the root causes of the citations;  Bringing the plant into compliance;  Establishing a new safety and health program; and  Ensuring that the above three phases were implemented.  In addition, they hired an off-site, safety and health consultant firm Consultant found that  Most injuries were a direct result of the employees' failure to follow established safety and health practices.  Accidents, injuries and near misses were not properly investigated.  The treatment for injured employees was not being followed up
  • 16. Recordable 1995-2005  Text Version: Title: Recordable 1995-2005 Type: Vertical Bar Graph Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year showing the number of recordable Values:  1995 = 14  1996 = 13  1997 = 14  1998 = 13  1999 = 10  2000 = 15  2001 = 19  2002 = 4  2003 = 5  2004 = 7  2005 = 5 
  • 17. Lost Time Cases (1995-2005)  Text Version: Title: Lost Time Cases 1995-2005 Type: Vertical Bar Graph Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year showing the number of lost time cases Values:  1995 = 10  1996 = 13  1997 = 10  1998 = 9  1999 = 6  2000 = 8  2001 = 4  2002 = 1  2003 = 0  2004 = 0  2005 = 1
  • 18. Lost Workdays 1995-2005  Title: Lost Workdays 1995-2005 Type: Vertical Bar Graph Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year showing the number of lost workdays Values:  1995 = 107  1996 = 82  1997 = 20  1998 = 19  1999 = 19  2000 = 196  2001 = 20  2002 = 180  2003 = 40  2004 = 50  2005 = 31
  • 19. Restricted Days 1995-2005  Title: Restricted Days 1995-2005 Type: Vertical Bar Graph Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year showing the number of restricted days Values:  1995 = 269  1996 = 189  1997 = 214  1998 = 105  1999 = 161  2000 = 69  2001 = 266  2002 = 0  2003 = 11  2004 = 0  2005 = 0
  • 20. Average Lost/Restricted Days Per Case 1995-2005  Title: Average Lost/Restricted Days Per Case 1995-2005 Type: Vertical Bar Graph Chart Elements: 11 - One bar for each year showing the number of restricted days Values:  1995 = 38  1996 = 21  1997 = 23  1998 = 14  1999 = 30  2000 = 33  2001 = 72  2002 = 180  2003 = 6  2004 = 0  2005 = 0
  • 21. The Impact  The $44,000 reduction of workers' compensation premiums from 2000 to 2003  The overall benefits to Ritrama include increased productivity and quality of the products;  The percent of credits and returns to sales went from a high of 2.22 percent in 2001 to 1.24 percent in 2006, which when translated into sales figures means that from a production standpoint, average sales rose 7.5 percent.  The number of manufacturing defects and amount of waste went from $2.7 M in 2001 to $435 K in 2005  The costs of hiring the Safety Consultant and installing new safety equipment have also been recovered
  • 22. ANGLO AMERICAN MINING COMPANY  ANGLOW AMERICAN Is the worlds most diversified mining company  commodity mix Like platinum group metals, diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, metallurgical and thermal coal are mined  They operate on six continents with 150000 permanent and contract employees.  Between the years 2002 to 2007 ANGLO AMERICAN SUFFERED CLOSE TO 200 FATALITIES  In the year 2007 Cynthia Carroll became the CEO of the ANGLO AMERICAN COMPANY  She was dissatisfied with the safety knowledge of the supervisors and the managers  Visited mines and did a research  A decision was made and the company was shut down and was planed that after a perfunctory safety check would resume production as soon as possible
  • 23. RESULT - Below are some of the data’s got from HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW) 40000 35000 30000 OPERATIN G INCOME 25000 IN $ US MILLIONS 20000 REVENUE 15000 IN $ US MILLIONS 10000 5000 0
  • 25. Direct benefits  costs savings  saving of time,  expenditure on medical care  reduction in the costs of accidents  reducing insurance premiums;  reducing litigation costs;  reducing sick costs;  improving production  productivity rates  lowering accident rates  reducing material damage Indirect benefits  include reducing absenteeism;  improving corporate images,  improved job satisfaction,  reducing sick pay,  lost time,  overtime working and clean
  • 26. The Hidden Cost of Unsafe Behavior – Running the Numbers  According to information provided in a report by a nationwide insurance company, approximately 60% of company executives figure that their companies save $3 for every dollar spent on safety programs. A $10,000,000.00 company that spends 1% of their budget on safety can figure to save approximately $300,000.00. OSHA puts the figure to be more