an educational presentation that discusses about speech context and its types.

1. TYPES OF
SPEECH
CONTEXTS
Contexts refers to the setting in
which communication situation
takes place.

2. Intrapersonal
Communication
Conversing with inner self by THINKING

3. PROCESS
1.Convert Information
2. Organized Information
3. Gather and Evaluate Results
4. Conclusion

4. INTERPERSONAL
COMMUNICATION
- Communication with
other people
- face-to-face, social/new media

5. A. TYPES OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION:
1. DYAD
- communication between two
people
- it may range from simple,
intimate, chit-chat or even business
Dyadic Communication – the
interrelationship between the two
people.

6. I: Functions of Dyadic
Communication
 Self Identity or Personal discovery
 Discovery of how people perceive you
 Know more about self and the person you are talking to
 Gain information
 Establish meaningful relationship
 Influence people
 Build an understanding

7. II: Types of Dyadic
communication
1. FORMAL
 Simply put, is the form of communication which religiously follows the rules
of language.
 Commonly used in interviews, counseling and confession.
2. INFORMAL
 By contrast to formal, it can be largely non-verbal, includes slang or even
slurred speech, as well as foul language.-Commonly used in chit-chat,
gossips, and intimate conversations.

8. II: Types of Dyadic
communication
Example:
FORMAL: "Hello, sir. It's wonderful to make your acquaintance. How are you
today?“
INFORMAL: "Dood. Wazzap?“
FORMAL: “Happy 18th Birthday, I hope you’ll turn out to be a successful
person. J”
INFORMAL: “Dudette legal ka na. I heard you turned 18. pabuger ka naman.
burger burger!!!”

9. II: Types of Dyadic
communication
Forms:
a. Telephoning
– can be formal/informal. This involves
two people talking through a
communication device. ( telephone & video
camera)
- The goal is to have someone type or
input into the computer the message to be
sent to its intended recipient.

10. II: Types of Dyadic
communication
Forms:
b. Dictation
two people communicate directly
through a communication device.
- The goal is to have someone type
or input into the computer the
message to be sent to its intended
recipient.

11. c. Face-to-Face Communication – the most
common form of Dyadic Communication
KINDS:
1. Interview – Question and Answer
format
2. Casual Conversation- exchange of
thoughts, opinions without formal
purpose
3. Dialogue- most personal and
intimate form of communication

12. III: Stages of Dyadic
Communication
1. Exploration
- “fencing period”
2. Interaction
- Main part of the
communication encounter
2. Termination
- Serves as the conclusion

13. 2. SMALL GROUP
COMMUNICATON
 occurs among 3-20 people
 shared and purposeful
communication
Allows an individual to express
their views, analyze situations,
and make crucial judgement.

14.  occurs among 3-20 people
 shared and purposeful
communication
Allows an individual to express
their views, analyze situations, and
make crucial judgments.

15.  you also develop teamwork,
problem-solving skills, and closer
relations with your group mates.
Groups generally work in a
context that is both relational and
social.

16.  Small group communication
follows the linear phase model (
Bales,1970), in which “ all groups
performing a given type of task go
through the same series of stages
in the same order.”

17.  Model of Decision Emergence
( B. Aubrey Fisher,1970)
- a small group will go
sequentially through an
orientation stage, a conflict
stage, an emergence stage
the decision is made, and a
reinforcement stage where a
decision is reinforced.

18.  Orientation stage- a topic is
introduced to the members.
Conflict stage- happens when
arguments on the topic arise and
members give their opinion. Once
the conflict is resolved, a decision
is made
and most often members agree
on the decision.

19. 2. SMALL GROUP
COMMUNICATON
1. They must listen to each other
carefully.
2. They must understand the
different points of view in the
discussion.
3. They must respect the opinion
of each other even if they don’t
agree with them.

20. 2. SMALL GROUP
COMMUNICATON
4. They must establish a common
ground when differences in views
arise.
5. They must create solutions for the
problem or situation presented.
6. They must arrive at an agreement
for the benefit of all members.

21. 2. SMALL GROUP
COMMUNICATON
 GROUP DECISIONS
There are opposing sides in a group
due to persuasion.
1. SOCIAL COMPARISON THEORY
- proposes that members will listen
to each other’s views and find the
“socially correct” side of the issue. But
if they find themselves deviant in this
regard, they

22. 2. SMALL GROUP
COMMUNICATONmay shift their opinion toward the
extreme socially correct position. This is
an example of normative influence.
2.Persuasive Arguments Theory
-states that each member has prior
knowledge on both sides, but she or he
will be persuaded by the side that has
a greater amount of shared
information,

23. 2. SMALL GROUP
COMMUNICATONwhich is not known to some
members of the group. This is an
example of informational
influence.
3. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
it is a speaker-audience
communication that involves
addressing a large audience.

24. 3.PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
The aim of the speak is usually to
inform or to persuade the audience to
act ,buy, or think in a certain way.
Example. When you are invited to give
a talk before your fellow on how to stay
safe during earthquakes or other
emergencies.

25. 4. MASS COMMUNICATION
Refers to the use of mass media ,
including digital media and new
media or social media to reach a
larger audience spread out in
different places at the same time.
Media channels ( print media and
broadcast media)

26. Determine the type of communication at
work in these situations( intrapersonal,
dyadic, small group, public communication
or mass communication)
1. Deciding on what to eat in the cafeteria.
2. Asking your mother for allowance.
3. Delivering a speech before your schoolmates.
4. Being a part of a committee choosing the theme of your school fair.
5. Watching a popular Korean telenovela
6. Explaining the scientific terms to a science experimental partner.