Abstract: The Riemann zeta function is one of the most Leonhard Euler important and fascinating functions in mathematics. Analyzing the matter of conjecture of Riemann divide our analysis in the zeta function and in the proof of conjecture, which has consequences on the distribution of prime numbers.
A Proof of Hypothesis Riemann and it is proven that apply only for equation ζ(z)=0.Also here it turns out that it does not apply in General Case.(DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.10888.34563/5)
It turns out that an equation x^p+y^q=z^w has a solution in Z+ if and only if at least one exponent p or q or w equals 2.DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.15459.22567/7
The Euler-Mascheroni constant is calculated by three novel representations over these sets respectively: 1) Turán moments, 2) coefficients of Jensen polynomials for the Taylor series of the Riemann Xi function at s = 1/2 + i.t and 3) even coefficients of the Riemann Xi function around s = 1/2.
The 1741 Goldbach [1] made his most famous contribution to mathematics with the conjecture that all even numbers can be expressed as the sum of the two primes (currently Conjecture) referred to as “all even numbers greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum-two primes” (DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.32893.69600/1)
Abstract: The Riemann zeta function is one of the most Leonhard Euler important and fascinating functions in mathematics. Analyzing the matter of conjecture of Riemann divide our analysis in the zeta function and in the proof of conjecture, which has consequences on the distribution of prime numbers.
A Proof of Hypothesis Riemann and it is proven that apply only for equation ζ(z)=0.Also here it turns out that it does not apply in General Case.(DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.10888.34563/5)
It turns out that an equation x^p+y^q=z^w has a solution in Z+ if and only if at least one exponent p or q or w equals 2.DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.15459.22567/7
The Euler-Mascheroni constant is calculated by three novel representations over these sets respectively: 1) Turán moments, 2) coefficients of Jensen polynomials for the Taylor series of the Riemann Xi function at s = 1/2 + i.t and 3) even coefficients of the Riemann Xi function around s = 1/2.
The 1741 Goldbach [1] made his most famous contribution to mathematics with the conjecture that all even numbers can be expressed as the sum of the two primes (currently Conjecture) referred to as “all even numbers greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum-two primes” (DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.32893.69600/1)
I am Anthony F. I am a Digital Signal Processing Assignment Expert at matlabassignmentexperts.com. I hold a Ph.D. in Matlab, University of Cambridge, UK. I have been helping students with their homework for the past 8 years. I solve assignments related to Digital Signal Processing.
Visit matlabassignmentexperts.com or email info@matlabassignmentexperts.com.
You can also call on +1 678 648 4277 for any assistance with Digital Signal Processing Assignments.
Growth of Functions
CMSC 56 | Discrete Mathematical Structure for Computer Science
October 6, 2018
Instructor: Allyn Joy D. Calcaben
College of Arts & Sciences
University of the Philippines Visayas
On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...BRNSS Publication Hub
We know that a large number of problems in differential equations can be reduced to finding the solution x to an equation of the form Tx=y. The operator T maps a subset of a Banach space X into another Banach space Y and y is a known element of Y. If y=0 and Tx=Ux−x, for another operator U, the equation Tx=y is equivalent to the equation Ux=x. Naturally, to solve Ux=x, we must assume that the range R (U) and the domain D (U) have points in common. Points x for which Ux=x are called fixed points of the operator U. In this work, we state the main fixed-point theorems that are most widely used in the field of differential equations. These are the Banach contraction principle, the Schauder–Tychonoff theorem, and the Leray–Schauder theorem. We will only prove the first theorem and then proceed.
EXACT SOLUTIONS OF A FAMILY OF HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL SPACE-TIME FRACTIONAL KDV-T...cscpconf
In this paper, based on the definition of conformable fractional derivative, the functional
variable method (FVM) is proposed to seek the exact traveling wave solutions of two higherdimensional
space-time fractional KdV-type equations in mathematical physics, namely the
(3+1)-dimensional space–time fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov (ZK) equation and the (2+1)-
dimensional space–time fractional Generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony
(GZK-BBM) equation. Some new solutions are procured and depicted. These solutions, which
contain kink-shaped, singular kink, bell-shaped soliton, singular soliton and periodic wave
solutions, have many potential applications in mathematical physics and engineering. The
simplicity and reliability of the proposed method is verified.
I am Anthony F. I am a Digital Signal Processing Assignment Expert at matlabassignmentexperts.com. I hold a Ph.D. in Matlab, University of Cambridge, UK. I have been helping students with their homework for the past 8 years. I solve assignments related to Digital Signal Processing.
Visit matlabassignmentexperts.com or email info@matlabassignmentexperts.com.
You can also call on +1 678 648 4277 for any assistance with Digital Signal Processing Assignments.
Growth of Functions
CMSC 56 | Discrete Mathematical Structure for Computer Science
October 6, 2018
Instructor: Allyn Joy D. Calcaben
College of Arts & Sciences
University of the Philippines Visayas
On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...BRNSS Publication Hub
We know that a large number of problems in differential equations can be reduced to finding the solution x to an equation of the form Tx=y. The operator T maps a subset of a Banach space X into another Banach space Y and y is a known element of Y. If y=0 and Tx=Ux−x, for another operator U, the equation Tx=y is equivalent to the equation Ux=x. Naturally, to solve Ux=x, we must assume that the range R (U) and the domain D (U) have points in common. Points x for which Ux=x are called fixed points of the operator U. In this work, we state the main fixed-point theorems that are most widely used in the field of differential equations. These are the Banach contraction principle, the Schauder–Tychonoff theorem, and the Leray–Schauder theorem. We will only prove the first theorem and then proceed.
EXACT SOLUTIONS OF A FAMILY OF HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL SPACE-TIME FRACTIONAL KDV-T...cscpconf
In this paper, based on the definition of conformable fractional derivative, the functional
variable method (FVM) is proposed to seek the exact traveling wave solutions of two higherdimensional
space-time fractional KdV-type equations in mathematical physics, namely the
(3+1)-dimensional space–time fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov (ZK) equation and the (2+1)-
dimensional space–time fractional Generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony
(GZK-BBM) equation. Some new solutions are procured and depicted. These solutions, which
contain kink-shaped, singular kink, bell-shaped soliton, singular soliton and periodic wave
solutions, have many potential applications in mathematical physics and engineering. The
simplicity and reliability of the proposed method is verified.
Computer Science
Active and Programmable Networks
Active safety systems
Ad Hoc & Sensor Network
Ad hoc networks for pervasive communications
Adaptive, autonomic and context-aware computing
Advance Computing technology and their application
Advanced Computing Architectures and New Programming Models
Advanced control and measurement
Aeronautical Engineering,
Agent-based middleware
Alert applications
Automotive, marine and aero-space control and all other control applications
Autonomic and self-managing middleware
Autonomous vehicle
Biochemistry
Bioinformatics
BioTechnology(Chemistry, Mathematics, Statistics, Geology)
Broadband and intelligent networks
Broadband wireless technologies
CAD/CAM/CAT/CIM
Call admission and flow/congestion control
Capacity planning and dimensioning
Changing Access to Patient Information
Channel capacity modelling and analysis
Civil Engineering,
Cloud Computing and Applications
Collaborative applications
Communication application
Communication architectures for pervasive computing
Communication systems
Computational intelligence
Computer and microprocessor-based control
Computer Architecture and Embedded Systems
Computer Business
Computer Sciences and Applications
Computer Vision
Computer-based information systems in health care
Computing Ethics
Computing Practices & Applications
Congestion and/or Flow Control
Content Distribution
Context-awareness and middleware
Creativity in Internet management and retailing
Cross-layer design and Physical layer based issue
Cryptography
Data Base Management
Data fusion
Data Mining
Data retrieval
Data Storage Management
Decision analysis methods
Decision making
Digital Economy and Digital Divide
Digital signal processing theory
Distributed Sensor Networks
Drives automation
Drug Design,
Drug Development
DSP implementation
E-Business
E-Commerce
E-Government
Electronic transceiver device for Retail Marketing Industries
Electronics Engineering,
Embeded Computer System
Emerging advances in business and its applications
Emerging signal processing areas
Enabling technologies for pervasive systems
Energy-efficient and green pervasive computing
Environmental Engineering,
Estimation and identification techniques
Evaluation techniques for middleware solutions
Event-based, publish/subscribe, and message-oriented middleware
Evolutionary computing and intelligent systems
Expert approaches
Facilities planning and management
Flexible manufacturing systems
Formal methods and tools for designing
Fuzzy algorithms
Fuzzy logics
GPS and location-based app
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology
On a Deterministic Property of the Category of k-almost Primes: A Determinist...Ramin (A.) Zahedi
In this paper based on a sort of linear function, a deterministic and simple algorithm with an algebraic structure is presented for calculating all (and only) k-almost primes (where ∃n∊ℕ, 1 ≤ k ≤ n) in certain intervals. A theorem has been proven showing a new deterministic property of the category of k-almost primes. Through a linear function that we obtain, an equivalent redefinition of the k-almost primes with an algebraic characteristic is identified. Moreover, as an outcome of our function’s property some equalities which contain new information about the k-almost primes (including primes) are presented.
Comments: Accepted and presented article in the 11th ANTS , Korea, 2014. The 11th ANTS is one of international satellite conferences of ICM 2014:The 27th International Congress of Mathematicians, Korea. (Expanded version)
Copyright: CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
On the k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral and applications Premier Publishers
Fractional calculus is a generalization of ordinary differentiation and integration to arbitrary non-integer order. The subject is as old as differential calculus and goes back to times when G.W. Leibniz and I. Newton invented differential calculus. Fractional integrals and derivatives arise in many engineering and scientific disciplines as the mathematical modeling of systems and processes in the fields of physics, chemistry, aerodynamics, electrodynamics of a complex medium. Very recently, Mubeen and Habibullah have introduced the k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral defined by using the -Gamma function, which is a generalization of the classical Gamma function. In this paper, we presents a new fractional integration is called k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, which generalizes the k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral. Then, we prove the commutativity and the semi-group properties of the -Riemann-Liouville fractional integral and we give Chebyshev inequalities for k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral. Later, using k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, we establish some new integral inequalities.
A general approach is presented to describing nonlinear classical Maxwell electrodynamics with conformal symmetry. We introduce generalized nonlinear constitutive equations, expressed in terms of constitutive tensors dependent on conformal-invariant functionals of the field strengths. This allows a characterization of Lagrangian and non-Lagrangian theories. We obtain a general formula for possible Lagrangian densities in nonlinear conformal-invariant electrodynamics. This generalizes the standard Lagrangian of classical linear electrodynamics so as to preserve the conformal symmetry.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Solve Equations
1. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342658373
Solve Polynomial and transcendental Equations with use Generalized Theorem
(Method Lagrange)
Research Proposal · July 2020
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33819.39208
CITATIONS
0
READS
1,451
1 author:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Goldbach's conjecture View project
Solve Polynomial-Transcendental Equations View project
Nikos Mantzakouras
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
21 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Nikos Mantzakouras on 02 August 2021.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
2. Solve Polynomial and transcendental Equations
with use Generalized Theorem (Method Lagrange)
N.Mantzakouras
e-mail: nikmatza@gmail.com
Athens – Greece
Abstract
While all the approximate methods mentioned or others that exist, give some specific solu-
tions to the generalized transcendental equations or even polynomial, cannot resolve them com-
pletely.”What we ask when we solve a generalized transcendental equation or polynomials, is to
find the total number of roots and not separate sets of roots in some random or specified inter-
vals. Mainly because too many categories of transcendental equations have an infinite number of
solutions in the complex set.” There are some particular equations (with Logarithmic functions,
Trigonometric functions, power function, or any special Functions) that solve particular prob-
lems in Physics, and mostly need the generalized solution. Now coming the this theory, using
the generalized theorem and the Lagrange method, which deals with hypergeometric functions or
interlocking with others functions, to gives a very satisfactory answer by use inverses functions
and give solutions to all this complex problem”.
The great logical innovation of the Generalized Theorem is that is gives us the philosophy to
work out the knowledge that the plurality of roots of any equation depends on the sub-fields of
the functional terms of the equation they produce. Thus the final field of roots of the equation
will be the union of these sub-fields.
keywords: Transcendental equations, solution, Hypergeometric functions,
field-subfield of roots, Polynomial, famus equations.
Part I.
I.1.Indroduction
According to the logic of the Generalized Theory of the Existence of Roots that we need and with which
we will deal after, and we before to prove, we will mention some elements more specifically for a random
general transcendental equation whish apply:
f(z) =
n
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0 (1.1)
with pi(z) functions of z in C, Primary simple transcendental equations, will be in effect the two initial
types (1.2, 1.3) with name LMfunction:
ϕk(w) =
n
X
i=1,i6=k
(mi/mk) · pi p−1
k (w)
(1.2)
∀i, k ≥ 1, i 6= k, {i, k ≤ n}
1
arXiv:2107.14595v1
[math.GM]
21
Jul
2021
3. for polynomials with n terms or transcendental equations in order to achieve a better and more efficient
solution. The general equation now of Lagrange is:
f(ζ) = f(w)w→−t/mk
+
∞
X
n=1
(−1)
n
n!
dn−1
dwn−1
[(f(w))0
{ϕ(w)}n
]w→−t/mk
(1.3)
All cases of equations start from the original function (1.4), with a very important relation:
pk(z) = −
t
mk
, k ≥ 1 ∧ k ≤ n (1.4)
If we assume now that it is apply from initial one pκ(z) = w, in Domain of, then if we apply the corresponding
transformation of the original equation (1.1), will be have,
ζ = z = p−1
κ (w) ⇔ pk(z) = w (1.5)
where after the substitution in the basic relation (1.3) and because here apply the well-known theorem
(Burman-Lagrange) we can calculate the any root of the equation (1.1).
But this previous standing theory is not enough to solving a random equation that will be (transcendental in
general) because it does not explain what is the number of roots and what it depends on. We will therefore
need a generalized theorem that gives us more information about the structure of an equation. We will
call this theorem the ”Generalized existence theorem and global finding of the roots of a random
transcendental or polynomial equation in the complex plane C or more simple Generalised
theorem of roots an equation”
I.2. Generalized roots theorem of an equation.(G.RT.L)
For each random transcendental or polynomial equation, of the form
σ(z) =
n
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, t, mi ∈ C (2.1)
it has as its root set the union of the individual fields of the roots, which are generated by the following
functions (of number n) which are at the same time and the terms of
m1 · p1(z) +
n
X
i=2
mi · pi(z) + t = 0 (σ1)
m2 · p2(z) +
n
X
i=1,j6=2
mi · pi(z) + t = 0 (σ2)
.....................................................
.....................................................
2
4. mκ · px(z) +
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi(z) + t = 0 (σk)
.....................................................
mn · pn(z) +
n−1
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0 (σn)
which ending in the generalised transcendental equation:
n
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, t, mi ∈ C
Provided that:
1. The coefficients mi, t 6= 0, where i positive integer and 1 ≤ i ≤ n, and are takes values in C, with at
least 1 coefficient of mi to be different of zero. Additional the functions pi(z) are analytical functions
and on or inside a contour c; and surrounding a point α and let β be such that apply inequality
14. |z − α| apply simultaneously, for functions of different type, or of different form,
or of different power generally. Here this inequality apply only for method Lagrange because each
method is different.
2. The subfields of the roots L1, L2, ..Lk, ..Ln of the corresponding equations σ1, σ2, ..σk.., σn that pro-
duced by the functional terms, are solved according to the theorem of Burman - Lagrange as long as
we work with this method. Of course the layout of the subfields is generally valid for each method
and belong in the total on or inside a contour c of the set C.
3. The number of subfields Li of roots will be also n, and consequently for the subfields of total of the
roots of the equation σ(z) =
n
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, t, mi ∈ C is n and will be apply L =
n
[
i=1
Li for the
total field of Roots of equation σ(z) = 0.
I.2.1. Proof
Let pk(z) and f(z), ϕ(z) be functions of z analytic on and inside a contour c surrounding a point α = −t/mk
and let β = −1/mk, 1 ≤ k ≤ n be such that the inequality
26. |z − (−t/mk)| [1] (2.2)
is satisfied at all points z on the perimeter of c letting pk(z) = ζ then doing inversion of the function I take
z = f(ζ) = p−1
k (ζ) and from the generalised transcendental equation or polynomial will be apply:
σ(z) =
n
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, {t, mi ∈ C} (2.3)
pk(z) = −
1
mk
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi(z) − t/mk (2.4)
3
27. ϕk(ζ) =
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi p−1
k (ζ)
(2.5)
and also will then apply f(ζ) = p−1
k (ζ) and the relation
zk = p−1
k
−
1
mk
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi(z) − t/mk
(2.6)
We regard as an equation as ζ which has one root in the interior of contour c; and further any function
of ζ is analytic on and inside c and therefore can be expanded as a power series with the use of a variable
w → −t/mk by the formula [1], will then result in the relation:
f(ζ) = f(w)w→−t/mk
+
∞
X
n=1
(−1)n
n!
dn−1
dwn−1
[∂wf(w){ϕ(w)}n
]w→−t/mk
(2.7)
where
ϕk(w) =
n
X
i=1,i6=k
(mi/mk) · pi p−1
k (w)
(2.8)
In the general case i.e. in cases equations with coefficient number larger than the trinomial we find those k
that are apply:
|mk| |mi| , i ≥ 1, i 6= k, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, 1 ≤ k ≤ n
to more easily achieve convergence of the sum of reaction (2.7).
And we come up with the root
zk
ik
= f(w)w→−t/mk
+
∞
X
n=1
(−1)n
n!
dn−1
dwn−1
[∂wf(w){ϕ(w)}n
]w→−t/mk
/ (2.9)
that is the relation for the solution of the roots a generalised transcendental equation
σ(z) =
n
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, t, mi ∈ C
having number of roots zk
ik
such that the number i is equal with the number of fields of roots of the primary
simple transcendental equation pi(z) = −
t
mi
. In this case now this determines also the field of the
roots of the equation mk · pk(z) +
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, (σk(z)) that is Lk and it also concerns only this
form, that is to say the form more simple (σk). Therefore for any subfield Li, 1 ≤ i ≤ n of roots and for
total field L of roots will apply:
The total L =
L1 =
∃z1
i1
∈ C : σ1 z1
i1
= 0, i ∈ Z+
∪ L2 =
∃z2
i2
∈ C : σ2 z2
i2
= 0, i2 ∈ Z+
∪ . . .
∪Ln =
∃zn
ih
∈ C : σn zn
in
= 0, in ∈ Z+
and therefore L =
n
[
i=1
Li (2.9)
4
28. I.2.2. Corollary 1.
The formations of the terms and the complementary sums are derived from the mk · pk(z) +
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi ·
pi(z) + t = 0 (σκ) and has a number n as proved below. If Lk is the subfield of the position k concerns only
this form of position k, that is to say the (σk) then consequently the total field of the roots of the equation
is L and will apply L =
n
[
i=1
Li .
Proof: We suppose that we have a natural number k with the attribute that follows: If a1, a2, . . . an
distinguished elements, then the number (n)k of provisions of n elements per k can also be written using
factorials with relation (n)k =
n!
(n − k)!
, therefore for k = 1 the (n)k =
n!
(n − 1)!
= n.
We have then n provisions as below:
p1(z) +
n
X
i=2
mi
m1
· pi(z) +
t
m1
= 0 (σ1) , with L1 the subfield of Roots
p2(z) +
n
X
i=1,i6=2
mi
m2
· pi(z) +
t
m2
= 0 (σ2) , with L2 the subfield of Roots
.....................................................
.....................................................
pk(z) +
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi
mk
· pi(z) +
t
mk
= 0 (σk) , with Lkthe subfield of Roots
.....................................................
pn(z) +
n−1
X
i=1
mi
mn
· pi(z) +
t
mn
= 0 (σn) , with Lnthe subfield of Roots
Now we let pi(z) and f(z) and ϕ(z) be functions of z analytic on and inside a contour C, surrounding a
point −t/mk and let −1/mk be such that the inequality
45. is satisfied
at all points z on the perimeter of C letting:
ζ = p−1
k
−
1
mk
·
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi(ζ) +
−t
mk
+ ε (3.1)
where ε is a const in general, then doing inversion of the function pk(z) for any z and from the generalised
transcendental equation
σ(z) =
n
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, t, mi ∈ C
5
46. Which represents the general form a transcendental equation or polynomial for any replacement.
I take with replacement:
pk(z) = −
1
mk
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi(z) −
t
mk
and (3.2)
ϕ(ζ) =
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi p−1
k (ζ)
, i 6= k, 1 ≤ i ≤ n (3.3)
after of course it is in effect then the equation
pk(ζ) = −
1
mk
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi · pi(ζ) −
t
mk
(3.4)
regarded as an equation of ζ which has one root in the interior of c; and further any function of ζ analytic
on and inside C can be expanded as a power series with a similar of ζ variable with the additional condition
w → −t/mk we then get the formula:
f(ζ) = p−1
(w)w→−t/mK
+
∞
X
j=1
(−1)j
Gamma(j + 1)
dj−1
dwj−1
∂w p−1
(w)
· {ϕ(w)}j
w→−t/mk
(3.5)
where ϕ(w) =
n
X
i=1,i6=k
mi
mk
· pi p−1
k (w)
(3.6)
with ∀i ≥ 1, i ≤ n, i 6= k in general. And we come up with the roots. This sitting helps to better
convergence with this method if apply the inequality (2.2). If we had the method Infinite Periodic Radicals,
we would have other conditions, certainly more favourable. The more general relation with method
Lagrange for the solution of the roots of the generalised transcendental equation will be:
z
Lk,q
sq = p−1
k (w, sq)w→−t/mK
+
∞
X
j=1
(−1)j
Gamma(j + 1)
dj−1
dwj−1
∂w p−1
k (w, sq)
· {ϕ(w, sq)}j
w→−t/mk
/ (3.7)
The σ(z) =
n
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, t, mi ∈ C it has roots Z
Lk,q
sq , where sq ∈ Z, q ∈ N and sq is a multiple
parameter with q specifying the number of categories within the corpus itself associated with either complex
exponential or trigonometric functions. The Lk,q is the subfield concerns only this form, that is to say
(σk). But the k-subfield itself can have q categories. Now, for the generalisation of cases, because this
k takes values from to 1 ÷ n, consequently the count of the basic subfields of roots also will be n, and
consequently the field of total of the roots of the equation is L and will apply:
L =
n
[
k=1
Luk
k , Luk
k =
uk
[
q=1
Lk,q, {k, uq ∈ N, 1 ≤ k ≤ n} (3.8)
The parameter uq takes different values and depends on whether a term function of the equation is trigono-
metric or exponential or multiple exponential or polynomial. Example for trigonometric is 1 ≤ uq ≤ 2 and
exponential with multiplicity 1 degree is uq = 1. We will look at these specifically in examples below. sq
is a parameter with q specifying the number of categories within the body itself that are associated with
either exponential or trigonometric functions or polynomial. ”But what is enormous interest about formula
(3.7) is that it gives us all the roots for each term of the equation σ(z) = 0, once it has been analyzed and
categorized using the inverse function technique p−1
k (w, sq) after we do the analysis separately in each case.
We will see this in some examples here and in Part II with the 7 most important transcendental equations.”
6
47. I.3. Solving of general trinomial xr2
+ m1 · xr1
+ t = 0 (ri, mi, t ∈ C, i = 1, 2).
I.3.1. We have the general equation with relation σ(z) =
2
X
i=1
mi · pi(z) + t = 0, t, mi ∈ C. Of course
in this case the following will apply: pi(x) = xri
, i = 1, 2. In this case it is enough to choose one of the 2
functions, in this case the 2nd function i.e p2(x) = xr2
, m2 = 1. According to the theory, we can to map
the second term function to a variable, suppose w and will apply:
p2(x) = xr2
= w ⇒ xs2 = p−1
2 (w, s2) = w1/r2
· e2·s2·π·i/r2
, 0 ≤ s2 ≤ r2 − 1
From the generalized relation (3.7) we obtain a formulation which will ultimately lead to a generalization
with hypergeometric functions. As we saw above we will have 2 transformations because we generally have
2 terms of functions. Now therefore, for the term function p2(x) = xr2
, m2 = 1 we have the relation (4.1)
that gives us the roots, for the second sub-field of roots L2:
Z
L2,1
s2 = w1/r2
· e2·s2·π·i/r2
w→−t
+
+
∞
X
j=1
(−1)j
Gamma(1 + j)
dj−1
dwj−1
∂w
w1/r2
· e2·s2·π·i/r2
n
m1 · wr1/r2
· e2·s2·π·i·r1/r2
oj
w→−t
(4.1)
I.3.2. Also according to the theory, we can now the first map i.e for the first term function to a variable w
and will apply: p1(x) = xr1
= w ⇒ xs1 = p−1
1 (w, s1) = w1/r1
· e2·s1·π·i/r1
, 0 ≤ s1 ≤ r1 − 1.
From the generalized relation (3.7) we obtain a formulation which will ultimately lead to a generaliza-
tion with hypergeometric functions. Therefore, for the first term function p1(x) = xr1
we have the relation
(4.2) that gives us the roots, for the first sub-field of roots L1:
Z
L1,1
s1 = w1/r1
· e2·s1·π·i/r1
w→−t/m1
+
+
∞
X
j=1
(−1)j
Gamma(1 + j)
dj−1
dwj−1
∂w
w1/r1
· e2·s1·π·i/r1
1
m1
· wr2/r1
· e2·s1·π·i·r2/r1
j
#
w→−t/m1
(4.2)
These forms as we have given them, we notice that in order to be able to work on them further, we have
to deal with the sum and bring it into a more generalized form, because we see a high differential of order
j − 1. So if we somehow stabilize the differential we can more easily convert the sum into a hypergeometric
function. The total field of roots L will be given by (3.8)
L1
1 = L1,1 ∧ L1
2 = L2,1 ⇒ L = L1
1 ∪ L1
2 = L1,1 ∪ L2,1 (4.3)
To calculate the n-th derivative, we refer to the works of Riemann and Liouvlle. The general formula is
Dq
0,xf(x) =
1
Γ(−q)
Z x
0
(x − x0)
−q−1
f (x0) dx0, q 0 (4.4)
7
48. The corresponding relation for the first and second approximate sum of the fields of relations (4.1, 4.2) will
be and in combination with relation (4.4) in the form:
Dj−1
0,z f(z) =
1
Γ(−j + 1)
Z z
0
(z − w)−j
f(w)dw (4.5)
So we come back to identify the generalisations on a case-by-case basis:
I.3.1.1. For the case of relation (4.1) apply:
dj−1
dwj−1
h
∂w w1/r2
· e2·s2·π·i/r2
m1 · wr1/r2
· e2·s2·π·i·r1/r2
j
i
=
= e
2iπs2
r2
e
2iπs2
r2
r1
· m1
j
· z
1+j·r1−j·r2
r2 · Gamma
1+j·r1
r2
/
r2 · Gamma
1+j·r1+r2−j·r2
r2
(4.7)
this auxiliary relation if we insert it into in relation (4.1 4.7) we will be able to calculate the roots as
values change for s2 with values in z, according to the following relations (4.8):
z
L2,1
s2 = z1/r2
· e2·s2·π·i/r2
z→−t
+
+
∞
X
j=1
(−1)j
Gamma(1 + j)
e
2iπs2
r2
e
2iπs2
r2
r1
· m1
j
· z
1+j·r2−j·r2
r2 · Gamma
1+j·r1
r2
/
r2 · Gamma
1+j·r1+r2−j·r2
r2
z→−t
(4.8)
I.3.2.1. Similar for the case of relation (4.2) apply:
dj−1
dwj−1
h
∂w w1/r1
· e2·s1·π·i/r1
1/m1 · wr2/r1
· e2·s1·π·i·r2/r1
j
i
=
= e
2iπs1
r1
e
2iπs1
r1
r2
/m1
j
· z
1+j·r2−j·r1
r1 · Gamma
1+j·r2
r1
/ (r1· Gamma
1+j·r2+r1−j·r1
r1
(4.9)
with relations (4.2 4.9) we will be able to calculate the roots of (4.2) as values change for s1 with values
in Z and thus it results the final relation (4.10):
z
L1,1
s1 = z1/r1
· e2·s1·π·i/z
z→−t/m1
+
+
∞
X
j=1
(−1)j
Gamma(1 + j)
e
2iπs1
r1
e
2iπs1
r1
r2
/m1
j
· z
1−jr1+jr2
t2 · Gamma
1 + j · r2
r1
/
r1 · Ganma
1 + j · r2 + r1 − j · r1
r1
z→−t/m1
(4.10)
the very basic relations now, besides being independent sums, can be transformed into hypergeometric
functions ones only in cases where the exponents r1, r2 ∈ Q. In cases where they r1, r2 ∈ R − Q, these
equations can be solved as sums of (4.8 4.10).
8
49. Example.
Solving of trinomial x7
+ 3 · x3
+ 7 = 0
If we want to solve a polynomial trinomial, we will solve the case with the largest exponent because this
relation will give us all the roots. We will therefore transform relation (4.8) into a PFQ hypergeometric
functions. In our case the data are (r2 = 7, r1 = 3, m1 = 3, t = 7).
The 7 roots are given by the relation (4.11) with respect to Z
L2,1
s2 and for s2 = 0 ÷ 6
(4.11)
Table 1. The roots of equation x7
+ 3x3
+ 7 = 0
9
50. Sinopsis: This sum of the form (4.2) must converge to some limit of a more general complex number, and
according to the terms of Lagrange’s theorem. The great advantage is that it shows that we have k groups
(fields) of roots resulting from the categorification of the inverse of either the exponential or trigonometric
form. The k root group are identified with the functional term position k of the equation σ(z) = 0 and have
a maximum number n. Of course, if a root class of the form (3.7) is transformed into a hypergeometric
function or a group of hypergeometric functions, then it has no need for constraints because the solution
fully realized.
I.4. Solving of trinomial xn
− x + t = 0 (n = 2, 3, 4 . . .)
Without losing generality we can find [19] at least one root of the equation
xn
− x + t = 0 (n = 2, 3, 4 . . .). (I)
by setting x = ζ
−
1
(n − 1) we easily find that (I) becomes
ζ = e2kπi
+ t · Φ(ζ) (II) where Φ(ζ) = ζ
n
n − 1 (III) and f(ζ) = ζ
−
1
n − 1 (IV)
The Lagrangian states that for any analytic function in a nearby region of equation (II) then
f(z) = f(α) +
∞
X
m=1
tm
m!
dm−1
dαm−1
[f0
(α){Φ(α)}m
] with α = e2kπi
with k = −
hn
2
i
, . . . , 0, . . .
hn
2
i
. Here we see the k root group that we mentioned in I.4.1.
If n = 2q, q ∈ N and also k = −
n − 1
2
, . . . , 0, . . . ,
n − 1
2
. Also if n = 2q + 1, q ∈ N or in gener-
ality [n] = 2q or [n] = 2q + 1 where q ∈ N.
In a simple way i get f(ζ) = ζ
−
1
n − 1 and with Dkxp
=
Gamma (p + 1) · xp−k
Gamma (p − k + 1)
and we come to a root
xk = e
−2π
ki
(N − 1)
−
t
N − 1
·
∞
X
n=0
t.e
−2π
ki
(N − 1
n
·
Gamma
N · n
N − 1
+ 1
Gamma
n
N − 1
+ 1
· Gamma [n + 1]
(V)
Using the Gauss Theorem, an infinite series is decomposed into infinite series of hypergeometric functions.
ψ(q) =
ωt
N − 1
qN
(N − 1)
N−1
Y
k=0
Gamma
Nq
N − 1
+ 1 + k
N
Gamma
q
N − 1
+ 1
·
N−2
Y
k=0
Gamma
(q + k + 2)
N − 1
10
51. And finally we get
x = ω−1
−
t
(N − 1)2
s
N
2π(N − 1)
N−2
X
q=0
ψ(q)N FN+1
qN
(N − 1)
+ 1
N
,
qN
(N − 1)
+ 2
N
, . . . ,
qN
(N − 1)
+ N
N
;
(q + 2)
N − 1
,
(q + 3)
N − 1
, . . . ,
(q + N)
N − 1
;
tg ω
(N − 1)
N−1
NN
Where ω = exp(2πi/(N − 1)). A root of an equation can be expressed as a sum from more hypergeometric
functions. Applying the Bring-Jerrard method to the quintic equation, we define the following functions:
F1(t) = F2(t)
F2(t) = 4F3
1
5
,
2
5
,
3
5
,
4
5
;
1
2
,
3
4
,
5
4
;
3125t4
256
F3(t) = 4F3
9
20
,
13
20
,
17
20
,
21
20
;
3
4
,
5
4
,
3
2
;
3125t4
256
F4(t) = 4F3
7
10
,
9
10
,
11
10
,
13
10
;
5
4
,
3
2
,
7
4
;
3125t4
256
Which are hypergeometric functions listed above. The roots of the quintic equation are:
x1 = −t4
· F1(t)
x2 = −F1(t) +
1
4
t · F2(t) +
5
32
t2
· F3(t) +
5
32
t3
· F3(t)
x3 = −F1(t) +
1
4
t · F2(t) −
5
32
t2
· F3(t) +
5
32
t3
· F3(t)
x4 = −i · F1(t) +
1
4
t · F2(t) −
5
32
i · t2
F3(t) −
5
32
t3
· F3(t)
x5 = −i · F1(t) +
1
4
t · F2(t) +
5
32
i · t2
F3(t) −
5
32
t3
· F3(t)
This is the same result that we achieve with the method of differential solvers developed by James Cockle
and Robert Harley in 1860.
11
52. I.5. Solving the transcendental trigonometric equation s · sin(z) + m · ez
+ t = 0, {s, m, t} ∈ C
According to the theory we developed before we consider 2 transformations. Here we have two functions
p1(z), p2(z) i.e p1(z) = sin(z) and p2(z) = ez
. For each case we need to find the inverse function separately
per function. Therefore we expect to have 2 subfields of roots L1, L2 and therefore the total solution of the
equation will be L = L1 ∪ L2. [20]
I.4.4.1. Finding the L1 field.
The first roots of sub-field results from inverse function and we give the relation p1(z) = sin(z) = ζ ⇒
⇒ z
L1,1
s1 = + ArcSin(ζ) + 2 · s1 · π ∧ z
L1,2
s2 = − ArcSin(ζ) + (2 · s2 + 1) · π, {s1, s2} ∈ Z So, using this method
(Lagrange) we will have 2 relations per case to find the set of solutions of the first L1 subfield. Now we
will have 2 subfields L1,1, L1,2 of L1 i.e. it will be valid L1 = L1,1 ∪ L1,2 independently but most of the
roots when we talk about complex set, they are comlex roots. For real roots the roots of these subfields are
different.
I. Finding the L1,1 subfield
From the 1st transformation it follows after inversion of the trigonometric term the relation we have first
subfield
zL1,1
s1
= + ArcSin(ζ) + 2 · s1 · π
according to relation (3.7) we obtain the final expression for finding roots , if we accept q a finite number of
positive integer. Normally in theory it is infinity, but in practice I take a number up to q0
= 25 and make
a local approximation with Newton’s method,
z
L1,1
1 = + ArcSin(ζ)+2·s1·π+
q0
X
w=1
(−m/s)w
/ Gamma(1+w)·Dw−1
ζ
∂ζ ArcSin(ζ) ·
eArcSin(ζ)+2s1π
w
(4.12)
with ζ → −t/s for s1 ∈ Z.
II. Finding the L1,2 subfield
Also for the second subfield in accordance with the foregoing will we have
zL1,2
s2
= π − Arc Sin(ζ) + 2 · s2 · π
similarly according to relation (3.7) we obtain the second final expression for finding the roots
z
L1,2
s2 = π − ArcSin(ζ) + 2 · s2 · π +
Pq0
w=1(−m/s)w
/ Gamma(1 + w) · Dw−1
ζ
−∂ζ ArcSin(ζ) · eπ−ArcSin(ζ)+2ssπ
w
(4.13)
with ζ → −t/s for s2 ∈ Z.
1.4.4.2. Finding the L2 field
The second field of roots results from inverse function and we give the relation p2(z) = ez
= ζ ⇒ zs1
=
log(ζ) + 2 · π · s1 · i, s1 ∈ Z. This case has not subfields.
12
53. According to relation (3.7) we obtain the second and final expression for finding the roots:
zL2
s1
= log(ζ) + 2 · π · s1 · i+
+
q0
X
w=1
((−s/m)w
/ Gamma(1 + w)) · Dw−1
ζ (∂ζ (log(ζ) + 2 · π · s1 · i) · sin (log(ζ) + 2 · π · S1 · i)
w
) =
= log(ζ) + 2 · π · s1 · i +
q0
X
w=1
((−s/m)w
/ Gamma(1 + w)) · Dw−1
ζ ((1/ζ) · sin (log(ζ) + 2 · π · s1 · i)
w
) (4.14)
with ζ → −t/m for s1 ∈ Z.
The value for q0
is theoretically infinity, but we can accept a finite value, e.g. q0
= 30, which gives us
a satisfactory approximation. We can of course extend it using a local approximation with the Newton
method.
Example. [20]
Solving transcendental equation 1/2 · sin(z) − 15 · ez
+ π = 0.
I. Finding the L1,1 subfield (10 roots consecutive for the value of s1 from zero, negatives integers)
To calculate the roots [20] for the first subfield we use the relation (4.12) which gives me for negative
values of s1 infinite values from the beginning:
Table 2. 9 roots consecutive of zero for L1,1
II. Finding the L1,2 subfield (10 roots consecutive for the value of s2 from zero, negatives integers)
The second subfield of roots which again arises with s2 negative values, we observe that they are con-
jugates of the previous. We use the relation (4.13):
13
54. Table 3. 9 roots consecutive of zero for L1,2
III. Finding the L2 subfield (1 root consecutive for the value of s1 equal to zero)
Using the relation (4.14) which again arises with s1 = 0 and we find a real root which is the only one:
Part II. 7 Famous Transcendental equations
(G.RT.L method)
1. Solution of the equation z · ez
= t
The roots of the equation play a role in the iteration of the exponential function[3;4;12] and in the so-
lution and application of certain difference - Equation [2; 10; 11; 13]. For this reason, several authors
[5; 6; 8; 9; 10; 13] have found various properties of some or all of the roots. There is a work by E. M.
Write, communicated by Richard Bellman, December 15,1958 . Also must mention a very important
offer of Wolfram in Mathematica program with the W-Function.
But now we will solve the with the method (G.RT.L), because it is the only method that throws ample light
on general solve all equations. All the roots of our equation are given by log(z)+z = log(t)+2·k ·π ·i (1.1)
where k takes all integral values as k = 0, ±1, ±2, ±3, . . . ± ∞. To solve the equation looking at three inter-
vals, which in part are common and others differ in the method we choose.
A) Because we take the logarithm in both parties of the equation, the case t 0 ∧ t ∈ R leads only
in complex roots. From the theory (G.RT.L) we get two cases according to relation (1.1), because the
relationship (1.1) has two functions, p1(z) = z (1.2) and p2(z) = log(z) (1.3).
Thus the first case (1.2) the solution we are the roots of the equation
zk = ζ +
∞
X
i=1
(−m)i
Gamma (i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
ζ0
· logi
(ζ)
(1.4)
where ζ0
is the first derivative of ζ with the type ζ = log(t) + 2 · k · π · i and k is integer, for a value of i.
Also the case when t and is a complex number and especially when |t| ≥ e, then the solution is represented
14
55. by the same form (1.4).
B) For interval 0 ≤ t ≤ 1
e ∧ t ∈ R but also general where 0 ≤ |t| ≤ 1
e in case that t is complex num-
ber and when k 6= 0, then the solutions illustrated from the equation:
zk = ζ +
∞
X
i=1
(−m)i
Gamma(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
ζ0
· logi
(ζ)
(1.5)
and in case that k = 0 then using the form p2(z) = log(z) = ζ ⇒ z = Exp(ζ) the Lagrange equation from
(G.RT.L) transformed to
zk = Exp(ζ) +
∞
X
i=1
(−m)i
Gamma(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
Exp(ζ)0
· Expi
(ζ)
(1.6)
but this specific form translatable to zk = Exp(ζ)+
P∞
i=1
(−m)i
Gamma (i+1) (i + 1)i−1
· Expi+1
(ζ)
(1.7) because
we know the nth derivative of Exp(m · x) = mn
· Exp(m · x).
C) Specificity for the region 1
e ≤ t ≤ e ∧ t ∈ R but more generally 1
e ≤ |t| ≤ e. Appears a small anomaly in
the form (1.5) and as regards the complex or real value for k = 0 in ζ = log(t) + 2 · k · π · i. The case for
Complex roots we get as a solution of the equation by the form
zk = ζ +
∞
X
i=1
(−m)i
Gamm a(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
ζ0
· logi
(ζ)
except if k 6= 0 (1.8)
Eventually the case k = 0 is presented and the anomaly in the approach of the infinite sum in the form
(1.6)
zs = Exp(ζ) +
∞
X
i=1
(−m∗)
i
G amm a(i + 1)
(i + 1)i−1
· Expi+1
(ζ)
!
(1.9)
but m∗ = m/es+1
with s = 1.
Because the replay will be s times and ζ = zs−1, s 1 we have to repeat. A very good approximation
also in this special case is when we use the method approximate of Newton after obtaining an initial root
zs with s = 1.
2. Maximum the surface area and volume of a hypersphere n dim’s
In mathematics, an n-sphere is a generalization of the surface of an ordinary sphere to arbitrary di-
mension. For any natural number n, an n -sphere of radius r is defined as the set of points in (n + 1) -
dimensional Euclidean space which are at distance r from a central point, where the radius r may be any
positive real number. It is an n -dimensional manifold in Euclidean (n + 1)− space.
The n-hypersphere (often simply called the n-sphere) [14] is a generalization of the circle (called by ge-
ometers the 2-sphere) and usual sphere (called by geometers the 3 -sphere) to dimensions n = 4. The n-
sphere is therefore defined (again, to a geometer; see below) as the set of n-tuples of points (x1, x2, · · · , xn)
such that
x2
1 + x2
2 + . . . + x2
n = R2
(2.1)
where R is the radius of the hypersphere.
Let Vn denote the content of an n-hypersphere (in the geometer’s of geometrical volume) of radius R is
15
56. given by Vn =
R R
0
Snrn−1
dr = Sn·Rn
n where Sn is the hyper-surface area of an n-sphere of unit radius. A
unit hypersphere must satisfy
Sn =
Z ∞
0
e−r2
rn−1
dr =
Z ∞
−∞
Z ∞
−∞
. . .·
Z ∞
−∞
e−(x2
1+...+x2
n)dx1 . . . dxn =
Z ∞
−∞
e−x2
dx
n
⇒
1
2
SnΓ(n/2) = (Γ(1/2))n
And to the end
Sn = Rn−1
2(Γ(1/2))n
/Γ(n/2) = Rn−1
2πn/2
/Γ(n/2)
Vn = Rn
πn/2
/Γ(1 + n/2) (2.2)
But the gamma function can be defined by Γ(m) = 2
R ∞
0
e−r2
r2m−1
dr.
Strangely enough, the hyper-surface area reaches a maximum and then decreases towards 0 as n increases.
The point of maximal hyper-surface area satisfies
dSn
dn
= Rn−1
2πn/2
/Γ(n/2) = Rn−1
πn/2
· [ln π − ψ0(n/2)] /Γ(n/2) = 0 (2.3)
Where ψ0(x) = Ψ(x) is the digamma function.
For maximum volume the same they be calculated
dVn
dn
= Rn
πn/2
/Γ(1 + n/2) = Rn
πn/2
· [ln π − ψ0(1 + n/2)] /(2 · Γ(1 + n/2)) = 0 (2.4)
From Feng Qi and Bai-Ni-Guo exist theorem:
For all x ∈ (0, ∞), ln x + 1
2
− 1
x ψ(x) ln (x + e−γ
) − 1
x the constant e−γ
= 0.56.
Taking advantage of the previous theorem solved in two levels ie:
From (3) we have 2 levels:
ln
1
2
x +
1
2
−
1
1
2 x
= ln π (a) and ln
1
2
x + e−γ
−
1
1
2 x
= ln π (b)
Both cases, if resolved in accordance with the theorem (G.RT.L) from by the form:
z = 2 · eζ
− 1/2
· +
∞
X
i=1
(−m)i
Gammd(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
2 · eζ
·
−2
2 (eζ − 1/2)
ζ
!!
(2.5)
with ζ → log(π) but m = 1/es+1
, with s = 1 as before in 1 case. The initial value for (a) case is 5.59464
and for (b) case is 5.48125. We use the method approximate of Newton after obtaining an initial root zs
with s = 1 is 7.27218 and 7.18109 respectively, finally after a few iterations. This shows that ultimately we
as integer result the integer 7, for maximum hyper-surface area.
Thereafter for the case of maximum volume, and before applying From Feng Qi and Bai -Ni-Guo[19]
For all x ∈ (0, ∞), ln
1
2 x + 1 + 1
2
− 1
(1
2 x+1)
= log(π) and ln 1
2 x + 1 + e−γ
− 1
1
2 x+1
= ln π·.
The results in both cases according to equation:
z = 2 · eζ
− 3/2
· +
∞
X
i=1
(−m)i
Gamma(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
2 · eζ
·
−2
2 (e5 − 3/2) + 2
5
!!
(2.6)
with ζ → log(π) but m = 1/es+1
with s = 1 as before case. In two cases end up in the initial values
3.59464 and 3.48125. We use the method approximate of Newton arrive quickly in 5.27218 and 5.18109
16
57. respectively. Therefore the integer for the maximum volume hyper-surface is the 5.
3. The Kepler’s equation
The kepler’s equation allows determine the relation of the time angular displacement within an orbit.
Kepler’s equation is of fundamental importance in celestial mechanics, but cannot be directly inverted in
terms of simple functions in order to determine where the planet will be at a given time. Let M be the mean
anomaly(a parameterization of time) and E the eccentric anomaly (a parameterization of polar angle) of a
body orbiting on an ellipse with eccentricity e, then:
j =
1
2
a · b · (E − e · sin E) ⇒ M = E − e · Sin E = (t − T) ·
s
a3
µ
and h =
√
p · µ
is angular momentum, j = Area - angular. Eventually the equation of interest is in final form is M = E −
e·Sin E and calculate the E. The Kepler’s equation [15] has a unique solution,but is a simple transcendental
equation and so cannot be inverted and solved directly for E given an arbitrary M. However, many algorithms
have been derived for solving the equation as a result of its importance in celestial mechanics. In essentially
trying to solve the general equation x − e · Sin x = t where t, e are arbitrary in C more generally. According
to the theory G.RT.L we have two basic cases p1(z) = z = ζ(a) and p2(z) = Sin(z) = ζ(b) which if the
solve separately, the total settlement will result from the union of the 2 fields of the individual solutions.
The first case is this is of interest in relation to the equation Kepler, because e 1. From theory G.R T .L
we have the solution
z = ζ +
∞
X
i=1
(e)i
Gamma(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
ζ0
· Sini
(ζ)
= ζ +
∞
X
i=1
(e)i
Gamma(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
Sini
(ζ)
(3.1)
for ζ → t. Since the exponents are changed from an odd to even we use two general expressions for the nth
derivatives. If we have even exponent is
∂2n−1
∂x2n−1
Sin2n
(x) = 1/22∗n−1
∗
n−1
X
k=0
(−1)n−k
∗(2∗n)!/(k!∗(2n−k)!)∗(2n−2k)2n−1
∗Sin[(2n−2k)∗t+(2n)π/2]
and for odd exponent is
∂2n
∂x2n
Sin2n+1
(x) =
1
22n
∗
n
X
k=0
(−1)n−k
∗(2∗n+1)!/(k!∗(2n+1−k)!)∗(2n−2k+1)2n
∗Sin[(2n−2k+1)∗x+(2n)π/2]
These formulas help greatly in finding the general solution of equation Kepler,because this is generalize the
nth derivative of Sini
(ζ) as sum of the two separate cases. So from (3.1) we can see the only solution for
the equation Kepler’s with the type (3.2)
z = t +
∞
P
n=0
1/22n
∗
n
P
k=0
(−1)n−k
∗ (m)2∗n+1
/ Gamma [2 ∗ n + 2]) ∗ (2 ∗ n + 1)!/(k! ∗ (2n + 1 − k)!)
∗(2n − 2k + 1)2n
∗ Sin[(2n − 2k + 1) ∗ t + (2n)π/2]
+
∞
P
s=0
1/22∗s−1
∗
s−1
P
k=0
(m)2∗s
/ Gamma [2 ∗ s + 1]) ∗ (−1)s−k
∗ (2 ∗ s)!/(k! ∗ (2s − k)!)
∗(2s − 2k)2s−1
∗ Sin[(2s − 2k) ∗ t + (2s)π/2]
(3.2)
The second case solution of the x − e · Sin x = t according to the theory G.RT.L we can also from the
p2(z) = Sin(z) = ζ (b) that z = ArcSin(z) + 2kπ and also z = − Ar · Sin(z) + (2k + 1)π. So the full solution
of the equation x − e · Sin x = t of the second field of roots is:
zk = (ArcSin(ζ) + 2kπ) +
∞
X
i=1
(1/e)i
Gamma(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
ArcSin(ζ)0
· (ArcSin(ζ) + 2kπ)i
(3.3)
17
58. Or also
zk = (− ArcSin(ζ) + (2k + 1)π) +
∞
X
i=1
(1/e)i
Gamma(i + 1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1
− ArcSin(ζ) · (− ArcSin(ζ) + (2k + 1)π)i
(3.4)
ArcSin(ζ)0
=
1
p
1 − ζ2
(3.5)
with ζ → t/e and k ∈ Z. An example is the Jupiter, with data M = 5 · 2 · π/11.8622 with eccentricity (e)
where e = 0.04844, then from equation (2) we find the value of (z or x or E) = 2.6704 radians.
4. The neutral differential equations (D.D.E)
In this part solve of transcendental equations we introduce another class of equations depending on past and
present values but that involve derivatives with delays as well as function itself. Such equations historically
have been referred as neutral differential difference equations[16].
The model non homogeneous equation is
n
X
k−1
gk ·
∂k
∂xk
x(t) +
m
X
r=1
cr ·
∂r
∂xr
x (t − τr) = a · x(t) +
σ
X
i=1
wi · x (t − νi) + f(t) (4.1)
With gk, cr, a, wi is constants and wi 6= 0 and f(t) is a continuous function on C. Of course any dis-
cussion of specific properties of the characteristic equation will be much more difficult since this equation
transcendental, will be of the form:
h(λ) = a0(λ) +
n1
X
j=1
aj(λ) · e−λ·τj
+
n2
X
i=1
bi(λ) · e−λνi
= 0 (4.2)
Where aj(λ), bi(λ), j 0 are polynomials of degree ≤ (m + σ) and a0(λ) is a polynomial of degree n also
must n1 + n2 ≤ m + σ. The equations (2) also resolved in accordance with the method G.RT.L and the
general solution is of as the form x(t) = fs(t) +
P
j pj(t) · eλj t
where λj are the roots of the equation of
characteristic and pj are polynomials and also fs 6= f in generally. As an example we give the D.D.E
differential equation x0
(t) − C · x0
(t − r) = a · x(t) + w · x(t − ν) + f(t)(3) (4.3) which is like an equation h(λ)
as of characteristic h(λ) = λ 1 − C · e−λ·r
−a−w ·e−λ·ν
= 0 where C 6= 0, r ≥ 0, ν ≥ 0 and a,w constants.
5. Solution of the equation xx
− m · x + t = 0
The solution of the equation is based mostly on the solution of equation xx
= z which has solution re-
lying on the solution of x · ex
= v which solved before. Specifically because we know the function Wk(z) is
product log function k ∈ Z, and using it to solve the equation x · ex
= ν is z = Wk(ν), ν 6= 0.
Also k ∈ Z, all the solutions of the equation xx
= z is for z 6= 0. According to this assumption we
can solve the equation xx
− m · x + t = 0 with the help of the method G.RT.L. According to the theory
G.RT.L we have two basic cases p1(x) = xx
= ζ(a) and p2(x) = x = ζ(b) which if the solve separately, the
total settlement will result from the union of the 2 fields of the individual solutions, ζ ∈ C. The first case
is of interest in relation to the equation has more options than the second, because it covers a large part of
the real and the complex solutions. This situation leads to the solution for x such that it is in the form
x = eProductLog[(2k)πi+log[ζ]]
or taking and the other form
x =
(log(ζ))
(Wk(log(ζ)))
(5.1)
18
59. From theory G.RT.L we have the solution
xk = eProductLog [h,2πik+log[ζ]]
+
∞
P
ν=1
(−m)ν
Gamma(i+1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
eProductLog [h,2πik+log[ζ]]
0
· eν· ProductLog [h,2πik+log[ζ]]
(5.2)
with the k ∈ Z and h = −1, 0, 1 or more exactly
xk = eProductLog[h,2πik+log[ζ]]
+
∞
P
ν=1
(−m)ν
Gamma (ν+1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
1
ζ·(1+ProductLog[h,2πik+log[ζ]])
· eν· ProductLog [h,2πik+log[ζ]]
(5.3)
with multiple different roots in relation to k and ζ → t. Variations presented in case where, when we
change the sign of m, t mainly in the sign of the complex roots. Even and in anomaly in the approach of
the infinite sum we use the transformation but m∗ = m/es+1
with s = 1, a very good approximation also
in this special case is when we use the method approximate of Newton after obtaining an initial root zs.
The second group of solutions represents real mainly roots of equation where p2(x) = x = ζ.
So we have
x = ζ +
∞
X
ν=1
(−1/m)ν
Gamma(ν + 1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
ζ0
· ζν·ζ
= ζ +
∞
X
ν=1
(−1/m)ν
Gamma(ν + 1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
ζν·ζ
(5.4)
with ζ → t/m,for m, t ∈ C in generally.
6. Solution of the equation xq
− m · xp
+ t = 0
An equation seems simple but needs analysis primarily on the distinction of m, but also the powers specific
p, q as to what look every time.
Distinguish two main cases:
i) p, q ∈ R
The weight of method would follow it takes m,which regulates the method we will follow any time. But
according to the method G.RT.L we have two basic cases p1(x) = xp
= ζ(a) and p2(x) = xq
= ζ(b) of which
solving it gives a global solution of the equation. For the case under consideration ie m 1, p q transforms
the original in two formats to assist us in connection with the logic employed by the general relation G.RT.L.
The first transform given from the form xp
− m · xq
+ t = 0 ⇒ xq
− (1/m) · xp
− t/m = 0 which is
now in the normal form to solve equation. First we need to solve the relationship xp
= ζ in C. Following
that we can get the form xk = e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/q
, k ∈ Z, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . ± IntegerPart[q/2] (6.1) and the
count of roots is maximum 2∗
IntegerPart[q/2] in generality.
Therefore so the first form of solution of the equation is:
xk = e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/q
+
∞
X
ν=1
(−1/m)ν
Gamma(i + 1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
e(log(ζ)+2k·π·i)/q
q · ζ
·
ep·(log(ζ)+2·kπ·i)/q
ν
(6.2)
Where ∂ζ e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/q
= e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/q
/(q ·ζ), with multiple roots in relation to k and k ∈ Z, k =
0, ±1, ±2, . . . IntegerPart[q/2] and ζ → t/m.
But for the complete solution of this case and find the other roots of the equation for this purpose i
make the transformation x = y−1
and we have xp
− m · xq
+ t = 0 ⇒ y−q
− m · y−p
+ t = 0 and then we
transform in 1 − m · yp−q
+ t · yp
= 0 ⇒ yp−q
− t/m · yp
− 1/m = 0. In this way we find a whole other roots
we have left from all the roots. The form of solution will be as above and assuming the that g = p − q we
19
60. have:
yk = e(log(ζ)+2·kπ·i)/g
+
∞
X
ν=1
(t/m)ν
Gamma(i + 1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
e(log(ζ)+2k·π·i)/g
g · ζ
·
ep·(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/g
ν
(6.3)
and xk = 1/yk which roots are in relation to k ∈ Z, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . ± IntegerPart[g/2] with ζ → −1/m.
The second case related to m 1 has no procedure for dealing with the method. Starting from the original
equation was originally found on the p and so the first transform given from the form xp
− m · xq
+ t = 0
to solve the relationship xp
= ζ in C, as helpful to the general equation G.RT.L. So we have
xk = e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/p
+
∞
X
ν=1
(−m)ν
Gamma(i + 1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/p
p · ζ
·
eq·(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/p
ν
(6.4)
with k ∈ Z, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . ± IntegerPart [p/2] with ζ → t To settle the issue of finding the roots, where
roots arise other and with m 1 then i make the transformation x = y−1
and we have xp
− m · xq
+ t =
0 ⇒ y−q
− m · y−p
+ t = 0 and then we transform in yq
+ 1/t · yq−p
− m/t = 0 with the pre case p q. This
transformation is relevant to the case remains as a final case before us. The solution in this case has form
and assuming the that g = p − q we have:
yk = e(log(ζ)+2·kπ·i)/q
+
∞
X
ν=1
(−1/t)ν
Gamma(i + 1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/q
q · ζ
·
eg(log(ζ)+2·kπ·i)/q
ν
(6.5)
and xk = 1/yk which roots are in relation to k ∈ Z, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . ± IntegerPart[q/2] with ζ → m/t.
ii) p, q ∈ C
In this case should first solve the equation, zq
− m · zp
+ t = 0, z ∈ C. The solution for z variable, af-
ter several operations in concordance with the type De Moivre, we get the relation connecting the real and
imaginary parts the general case of complex numbers za+bi
= x + yi and the solution is
zk = e
b(2kπ+Arg(x+yi))
a2+b2
x2
+ y2
a
2(a2+b2) Cos
a(2kπ + Arg(x + yi))
a2 + b2
−
b log
x2
+ y2
2 (a2 + b2)
#
+
e
b(2kπ+Arg(x+yi))
a2+b2
x2
+ y2
a
2(a2+b2) Sin
a(2kπ + Arg(x + yi))
a2 + b2
−
b log
x2
+ y2
2 (a2 + b2)
# (6.6)
we see that the number of solutions, resulting from the denominator of the fraction that the full line equals
with the c = a2
+ b2
/a if prices of k ∈ Z, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . . ± IntegerPart[c/2]. For the case under con-
sideration ie m 1, p q transforms the original in two formats to assist us in connection with the logic
employed by the general relation G.RT.L.
The first transform given from the form xp
− m · xq
+ t = 0 ⇒ xq
− (1/m) · xp
− t/m = 0 which is
now in the normal form to solve equation. First we need to solve the relationship xp
= ζ in C. Following
that we can get the form k ∈ Z, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . ± IntegerPart[q/2] and the count of roots is maximum
2∗
IntegerPart[q/2] in generality. The solution is when we analyze the power as
yk = e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/q
+
∞
X
ν=1
(−1/m)ν
Gamma(ν + 1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
e(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/q
q · ζ
·
ep(log(ζ)+2·k·π·i)/q
ν
(6.7)
and xk = yk which roots are in relation to k ∈ Z, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . ± IntegerPart[q/2] with ζ → t/m. The
remaining cases are similar to previous with p, q ∈ R. The sole change is in relation to the number of cases
is Integer a2
+ b2
/a
for (+/ − x axes ) and za+bi
= x + y · i = w for any w, z ∈ C.
20
61. 7. 2 Famous equations of physics
i) The difraction phenomena due to ”capacity” of the waves bypass obstacles in their way, so to be
observed in regions of space behind the barriers, which could be described as geometric shadow areas.
In essence the phenomena of diffraction phenomena [17,18] is contribution, that is due to superposition of
waves of the same frequency that coexist at the same point in space.
If I0 is the intensity at a distance r0 from the slot at θ = 0, ie opposite to the slit. So finally we write the
relationship in the form
I(θ) = Io
sin2
w
w2
w =
1
2
kD sin θ
The maximum intensity appears to correspond to the extremefunction sin w/w.Derivative of and equating to
zero will take the trigonometric equation w = tan w a solution which provides the values of w corresponding
to maximum intensity. With the assist of a second of the relations We can then, for a given problem is
know the wave number k (or wavelength λ ) and width D the slit, to calculate the addresses corresponding
to θ are the greatest.
If we consider a set of 2N + 1 parallel slits width D, the distance from center to center is a and which we
have numbered from −N to N. Such a device called a diffraction grating slits. We accept that sufficiently
met the criterion for Fraunhofer diffraction and find the equation for the Intensity.
I(θ) = Io
sin2
w
w2
sin2
Mu
sin2
u
where
w =
πD sin θ
λ
u =
πa sin θ
λ
There fringes addresses for which zero quantity sin u, and therefore the intensity of which is determined by
the factor sin2
w/w2
So we must solve the relation w = tan w (7.1).
Where k = α/D and u = kw, m = M. Trying solving the general form of the equation w = m∗
tan w
with m ∈ C, consider 2 general forms of solution, arising from the form Cos(w) = ζ and Cos(w) = ζ ⇒ w =
± ArcCos(w) + 2kπ, k ∈ Z, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . so we have:
wp = (ArcCos(ζ) + 2kπ) +
∞
P
i=1
(m)i
Gamma(i+1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1 (ArcCos(ζ)0
· (Sin[ArcCos(ζ) + 2kπ)]/(ArcCos(ζ) + 2κπ))i
(7.2)
and the form
wq = (− ArcCos(ζ) + 2kπ) +
∞
P
i=1
(m)i
Gamma(i+1)
∂i−1
∂ζi−1 (− ArcCos(ζ)0
· (Sin[− ArcCos(ζ) + 2kπ)]/(− ArcCos(ζ) + 2κπ))i
(7.3)
Then the general solution is wq ∪ wp.
ii) The spectral density of black body is given by the equation
u(ν) = Ēp(ν) =
hν
ebhν − 1
8πν2
c3
=
8πh
c3
ν3
ehν/kT − 1
according to the relationship of Plank.
21
62. The correlated u (λ)
u(λ) =
8πhc
λ5
1
ehc/kT λ − 1
By c = λ/T = λν which is extreme if the derivative zero. Thus we have the relationship
d
dλ
u(λ) = 8πhc
−5λ4
ehc/kT λ
− 1
− λ5
ehc/kT λ
− 1
λ2
hc
kT
λ10 ehc/kT λ − 1
2
Zeroing the derivative will have the relationship
−5
ehc/kT λ
− 1
+ ehc/kT λ
1
λ
hc
kT
= 0
And if x = hc/kTλ then we get the equation
5 − 5e−x
− x = 0 (7.4)
Finding the solution of x we find the relationship λmaxT = b By b = hc/4.965 · k Is called constant Bin,
called displacement law. Then we need to calculate the general solution of the equation by the method
G.RT.L.
The first group of solutions represents real mainly roots of equation where p1(x) = x = ζ. So we have
x = ζ +
∞
X
ν=1
(m)ν
Gamma(ν + 1)
∂ν−1
∂ζν−1
(ζ0
· Exp[−ζ]ν
)
= ζ +
∞
X
ν=1
(m)ν
Gamma(ν + 1)
−νν−1
e−ζv
with ζ → t, for m, t ∈ C. In this case t = 5 and m = −5, we calculate the x = 4.9651142317442763037
the nearest 20 ignored.
Because apply relation
∂r
∂xr
e−xw
= (−w)r
e−xw
∂r
∂xr
exw
= (w)r
exw
The second group of solutions represents complex roots of equation where
p2(x) = ex
= ζ ⇒ x = log(ζ) + 2κπi
But this does not refer to real solutions and not the physical evol equations for this and omitted.
Epilogue
The one-way solution of an equation so as we have shown either if it is polynomial or transcendental
passes through 3 processes. First we assume that the generalized theorem holds, then we categorize the
functional terms of which it consists, and finally we use a solution method. So far there are mainly 2
methods. Lagrange’s method and the method of infinite Periodic Radicals.
The approximation is achieved by strengthening the original approximation locally, by Newton’s method.
The completion of the process is done by joining all the root fields generated by each functional term of the
equation.
22
63. References
[1] Course of modern analysis: An introduction to the general theory of modern analysis, E.T Witteker
And G.N Watson, press Campridge 2002, pp.128-135.
[2] R.Bellman, Ann of Math .vol 50 (1949) pp.347-355.
[3] G.Eisenstein, J.Reine Angew. Math.vol 28 (1844) pp. 49-52.
[4] L.Euler, Opera Omnia (i) vol.15, Leipsig and Berne, 1927 ,pp.268-297.
[5] N.D.Hayes, J.London Math.Soc.vol 25(1950) pp.226-232
[6] Quart.J.Math. Oxford Ser.(2) vol.25(1950) pp.226-232.
[7] A.Hurwitzand R.Courant,Funktionentheorie, 3d ed, Berlin 1929, pp 141-142.
[8] E.M.Lemeray, Nouv.Ann. de Math.(3) vol.15 (1896), pp.548-556 and vol 16(1896) pp.54-61.
[9] Proc.Edinburg Math, Soc.vol16 (1897) pp.13-35.
[10] O.Polossuchin, tesis, Zurich,1910.
[11] F.Schure, Ber.Verh.Sachs.Akad.Wiss.Leipzig Math.-phys.KL.vol 64(1912).
[12] E.M.Wright, Quart, J.Math.Oxford Ser.(2) vol.18(1947) pp.228-235.
[13] J.Reine Angew.Math.vol.194 (1955) pp.66-87, esp. pp 72-74.
[14] https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Hypersphere.html
[15] http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KeplersEquation.html
[16] Delay Differential Equations: Recent Advances and New Directions By Balakumar Balachandran,
Tamas Kalmar-Nagy, David E.Gilsinn.
[17] yako.physics.upatras.gr/waves/12.pdf
[18] Intdrouction in quantum mechanics, Antonis Streklas
[19] Feng Qi and Bai –Ni-Guo, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.01494.pdf
[20] Mantzakouras Nikos Solve Polynomials and Transcendental equations using Mathematica, p.50-80,
2012, also in internet a part
https://www.academia.edu/21964173/Solve_Equations_With_method_Lagrange_
23
View publication stats
View publication stats