Solar power satellites capture solar energy via large photovoltaic arrays in space. The energy is transmitted to Earth as a microwave or laser beam and converted into electricity via rectennas. Space-based solar power has advantages over ground-based solar like continuous power without night or weather effects. It also avoids using land area and has no variation in power supply. Developing space solar power would require high initial costs but could provide clean, renewable base-load electricity for the future without relying on exhaustible resources.

1. SOLAR
POWER
SATELLITE
(SPS)
SHAIK
MOHAMMEDSAJID
199Y1AO347

2.  Solar Energy is captured in
space by large photovoltaic arrays
and transmitted via a coherent
microwave or laser beam to an
Earth receiver where it is
into either base-load
power, low-intensity
power, or synthetic
converted
electric
charging
fuels .
 Sunlight captured in space is many
times more effective in providing
continuous base load power
compared to a solar array on the
Earth.
 SBSP has been studied since
1970’s by DOE, NASA, ESA, and
JAXA.
What is Space Solar Power?

4. There are many reasons for switching to sps for energy
generation.
First and at most reason can be understood from the table below
Source Clean Safe Reliable Base-load
Fossil Fuel No Yes Decades remaining Yes
Nuclear No Yes Fuel Limited Yes
Wind Power Yes Yes Intermittent No
Ground Solar Yes Yes Intermittent No
Hydro Yes Yes Drought; Complex Scheduling
Bio-fuels Yes Yes
Limited Qty – Competes with
Food
Space Solar Yes Yes Yes Yes

5. SBSP IS MOST LIKE HYDROELECTRIC
🞭 High Capital Costs
🞭 Long Payback
🞭 No Fossil Fuel Feed
🞭 Renewable
🞭 2.07 GW (peak)
🞭 High Capital Costs
🞭 Long Payback
🞭 No Fossil Fuel Feed
🞭 Renewable
🞭 2.5 GW (sustained)

6. Comparison of GROUND base and SPACE base solar plant
No Night Min Weather
Ground Solar
Space Solar
Solar Intensity
1,366 W/m2
Solar Intensity
1,000 W/m2 Night Loss
Weather Loss

7. Geostationary orbit is very high, 40,000
km (26,500 miles) above the surface of
the Earth. It is far above the range of the
Space Shuttle, which has a maximum
range of about 1000 km (600 miles)
above Earth's surface
The satellites would be placed in so-called
"geostationary" or "Earth synchronous" orbit, a
24-hour orbit which is thus synchronized with
Earth's rotation, so that satellites placed there
will stay stationary overhead from each's
receiving antenna.

8. Solar power
satellite
Transmission
Concentrating
mirrors
Photo voltaic
cell
Microwave
transmitter
dish
receiving
Rectenna Grid

10. RECTENNA
A rectenna is a rectifying
antenna, a special type of
antenna that is used to directly
convert microwave energy into
DC electricity. Its elements are
usually arranged
pattern, giving it
in a mesh
a distinct
most
appearance from
antennae.
A simple rectenna can be
a
constructed from
Schottkydiode placed
between antenna dipoles.
current
antenna
induced in
by
The diode rectifies the
the
the
microwaves. Scotty diodes
are used because they have
the lowest voltage drop and
therefore waste the
minimum power.

11. The rectenna consists of an array of
dipole antennas connected to diodes to
convert the radio frequency energy to
DC voltage, which is then converted
to regular AC electricity and wired to
homes, factories, etc.
The efficiency of the SPS is
often stated in terms of "DC to
DC efficiency", i.e., from the
DC input at the solar cells to
the DC output of the rectenna.
The DC to DC efficiency is
generally estimated at 63%.

12. The SPS beam falls within the UHF band ,with a frequency of 2.45GHZ.
The SPS beam is basically a radio beam
The SPS will operate at a frequency designed to NOT be absorbed
by water in the atmosphere, and to pass through clouds and rain.
Microwave frequencies are harmlessly used in communications,
using different microwave frequencies which avoid absorption by
water in the atmosphere so that they travel a long distance. The SPS
beam will use a frequency tuned for minimal absorption by the
atmosphere, clouds and storms.
Reason why microwave "radiation" is safer is that it is of much
lower frequency or energy than the ultraviolet light you receive
from sunlight outdoors, and from the x-rays coming from your TV
and computer screen. X-ray and ultraviolet radiation are ionizing
radiation which can disrupt molecules in the body. Microwave
radiation by the SPS is even less potent than infra-red radiation
from heaters and stoves.
There will be a small disturbance do to this microwave on the communication
waves which fall under that frequency

13. With the SPS, problems such as daylight and bad-weather conditions, which one
might have to deal with , when using solar panels, do not exist.
The energy received by the rectennas on earth is ten times more than that received by
solar panels of the same surface.
The solar panels used on the surface of the earth prevent sun beams to go through
them and consequently prevent any kind of cultivation of the earth under them. But
with SPS the photo voltaic cells are in space, so we have no problem with the area
needed. In addition the rectennas on earth are semi-transparent allowing sun light to go
through them and making possible the cultivation of the soil
There is no variation of power supply during the course of the day and night, or from
season to season

14. High development cost. Yes, space solar power
development costs will be very large, although
much smaller than American military presence in
the Persian Gulf or the costs of global warming,
climate change, or carbon sequestration. The cost
of space solar power development always needs
to be compared to the cost of not developing
space solar power

15. From all the reasons above we can conclude that SPS is the major way to face
the demand of electricity FOR FUTURE. If we develop this project we need
not bother about the exhaustment of natural resources which are used in
generation of power. If this project succeeds it will become boon to the next
generations.