10 min Impuls presentation at the Federal Environment Agency in Berlin about Sharing Cities - with special focus on differences to Smart Cities characteristics and a potential analysis done on the sharing and collaborative economy in Berlin end of 2014 with the subtitle: From a Divided to a Sharing City: Berlin on its way to a Sharing City. The presentation includes a short overview of the different chapters giving the contextualisation and suggesting indicators (I), presents actors in Berlin via a mapping and classification (II), some results from the survey (III), one example of Sharing Cities (IV), generell and more precise recommendations of actions (V) as well as further information about Sharing City networks, Sharing City Amsterdam, two examples of City Government as a Provider of items to share (Paris & Barcelona) and a final case for the fostering Sharing Cities and the Civic Economy/Society. (Some information about OuiShare and the speaker at the end).
Re-imagining capitalism - UBER-Predators & UNDER-Dogs Thomas Doennebrink
In the context of an interesting joint one-week seminar by the Universities of St. Gallen & Copenhagen held 30 min input on platform capitalism and platform coops with special focus on UBER as it was the main subject of the day. Very lively discussion with well informed students asking good and the right questions followed in the remaining 45 min.
A rapid fire presentation of the activities done in the name of PlatformCoop and PlatformCoopBerlin in the in the time between Nov. 2015 (1. PlatformCoop Conference in NYC and Nov. 2016 (2. PlatformCoop Conference in NYC) as well as a summary, learnings, evalution of the status quo and a look at the next events planned. Presented at the 2. Platformcoop Conference @NewSchool in NYC (see: http://www.platformcoop.net/2016/participants/thomas-doennebrink)
Old Economy vs. New Economy. Keynote speech at the annual EUKN EGTC ConferenceThomas Doennebrink
Keynote @Conference on the Civic Economy - Time to get ready Organized by European Urban Knowledge Network (EUKN) in cooperation with the municipality of Amsterdam & Pakhuis de Zwijger. Amsterdam 20.10.2014.
New Perspectives for Use-Values? For an Empirical Understanding of Digital La...Lorenz Grünewald
How can we understand the new freedoms that digitally networked media (social media) have opened up? The presentation employs social theory from Marx to Weber and Schumpeter to analyze new music networks that use YouTube as a means of production and how YouTube is gradually taking back some freedoms in processes of economization.
What happened in Quito: An account on UN Habitat 3Roberto Rocco
This is an account of the 3rd Un Habitat Conference in Quito and an analysis of the New Urban Agenda, made by Roberto Rocco and Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado (TU Delft)
Re-imagining capitalism - UBER-Predators & UNDER-Dogs Thomas Doennebrink
In the context of an interesting joint one-week seminar by the Universities of St. Gallen & Copenhagen held 30 min input on platform capitalism and platform coops with special focus on UBER as it was the main subject of the day. Very lively discussion with well informed students asking good and the right questions followed in the remaining 45 min.
A rapid fire presentation of the activities done in the name of PlatformCoop and PlatformCoopBerlin in the in the time between Nov. 2015 (1. PlatformCoop Conference in NYC and Nov. 2016 (2. PlatformCoop Conference in NYC) as well as a summary, learnings, evalution of the status quo and a look at the next events planned. Presented at the 2. Platformcoop Conference @NewSchool in NYC (see: http://www.platformcoop.net/2016/participants/thomas-doennebrink)
Old Economy vs. New Economy. Keynote speech at the annual EUKN EGTC ConferenceThomas Doennebrink
Keynote @Conference on the Civic Economy - Time to get ready Organized by European Urban Knowledge Network (EUKN) in cooperation with the municipality of Amsterdam & Pakhuis de Zwijger. Amsterdam 20.10.2014.
New Perspectives for Use-Values? For an Empirical Understanding of Digital La...Lorenz Grünewald
How can we understand the new freedoms that digitally networked media (social media) have opened up? The presentation employs social theory from Marx to Weber and Schumpeter to analyze new music networks that use YouTube as a means of production and how YouTube is gradually taking back some freedoms in processes of economization.
What happened in Quito: An account on UN Habitat 3Roberto Rocco
This is an account of the 3rd Un Habitat Conference in Quito and an analysis of the New Urban Agenda, made by Roberto Rocco and Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado (TU Delft)
Alain Deneef, Intendant, Brussels Metropolitan. Presented at Crowdsourcing Week Europe 2015. For more information or to join the next event: http://crowdsourcingweek.com/
Smart Cities - Why they're not working for us yet.Rick Robinson
My presentation to the April 2016 Eurocities Knowledge Sharing Forum in Rennes. My focus was on describing Smart Cities as an economic and political challenge; and exploring the policy mechanisms that could be used to incentivise private sector investments in business and technology to support local social, economic and environmental outcomes. Further description and supporting evidence for these ideas can be found at https://theurbantechnologist.com/2016/02/01/why-smart-cities-still-arent-working-for-us-after-20-years-and-how-we-can-fix-them/
Despite the hype about Smart Cities, many IoT startups find this sector daunting, thinking smart city applications are complex, hard to sell and require intensive support. Rick Robinson thinks this is a myth and in this talk he will look at the current state of Smart Cities and where some of the most interesting challenges lie.
The new Wonderland magazine Activate & Involve presents how young architects and planners in Europe are engaging to their cities today. The Project Space cooperative planning workshop in different cities are presented together with the work done by young offices. Enjoy the reading!
Urban nodes of soft infrastructure in Amsterdam and BerlinNico Janssen
A research study to the initiative, development, functioning, benefits and effects of vibrant social - urban places in Amsterdam and Berlin which stimulate the livability and vitality of neighborhoods, quarters and the city as a whole and are developed by local initiatives (artists, local entrepreneurs, local inhabitants)
Urban Thinkers Campus TU Delft Report, World Urban Forum 9Roberto Rocco
Presentation given ay the World Urban Forum 9 in Kuala Lumpur on the results of the Urban Thinkers Campus held at TU Delft "EDUCATION FOR THE CITY WE NEED", sponsored by the World Urban Campaign, Arcadis and others.
Intelligent school design - english versionVoD_group
VoD platform proposes the postgraduate course “Intelligent school design” in order to give a practical interpretation to the recent D.M. 11/4/2013, guidelines for sustainable design of schools. The course works both in distance learning and in face to face learning. The organization of the course is thus light and interactive, it doesn't interfere with the working activities of the participants. Thou the low cost of participation, it gives a high surplus value, both professional and social, thanks to three final collaborative workshops.
Urban co-creation by Nexthamburg: the "Bremen on the move" (Bremen bewegen) p...Elena Mozgovaya
Presentation of Nexthamburg and one of its projects - Bremen on the move - on the Informed cities forum in Rotterdam, 26.03.2015 (http://informed-cities.iclei-europe.org/)
Prologue to "Better Cities, Better Life" book that is going to be published in the following months.
The Prologue Chapter is called "Urban Innovation: A Decalogue to Explore a City" (Igor Calzada)
Envisioning the City of the Future: Making the Invisible Visible. International Concept and design competition open to students, graduates and experts.
This paper is a report on the recent special session of papers presented at the Regional Studies Association (RSA) Annual Conference in Dublin, entitled ‘Beyond Smart & Data-Driven City-Regions: Rethinking Stakeholder-Helixes Strategies’. The session was a collaboration between the Urban Transformations ESRC programme at the University of Oxford and the Future Cities Catapult.
Connecting Cities, Technologies and Citizens – the Swiss-European-Japanese pr...Stephan Haller
Smart Cities is a lot about connectivity and networking, not just in the technical sense. This talk given at a mini-symposium of the Swiss Informatics Society in May 2019 highlights this using the EU-Japan Horizon 2020 project CPaaS.io.
The full talk is available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/kmh26qUnGh8
Old vs. New Economy. Keynote speech at EUKN EGTC Conference - Civic Economy i...OuiShare
Keynote @Conference on the Civic Economy - Time to get ready Organized by European Urban Knowledge Network (EUKN) in cooperation with the municipality of Amsterdam & Pakhuis de Zwijger. Amsterdam 20.10.2014.
Alain Deneef, Intendant, Brussels Metropolitan. Presented at Crowdsourcing Week Europe 2015. For more information or to join the next event: http://crowdsourcingweek.com/
Smart Cities - Why they're not working for us yet.Rick Robinson
My presentation to the April 2016 Eurocities Knowledge Sharing Forum in Rennes. My focus was on describing Smart Cities as an economic and political challenge; and exploring the policy mechanisms that could be used to incentivise private sector investments in business and technology to support local social, economic and environmental outcomes. Further description and supporting evidence for these ideas can be found at https://theurbantechnologist.com/2016/02/01/why-smart-cities-still-arent-working-for-us-after-20-years-and-how-we-can-fix-them/
Despite the hype about Smart Cities, many IoT startups find this sector daunting, thinking smart city applications are complex, hard to sell and require intensive support. Rick Robinson thinks this is a myth and in this talk he will look at the current state of Smart Cities and where some of the most interesting challenges lie.
The new Wonderland magazine Activate & Involve presents how young architects and planners in Europe are engaging to their cities today. The Project Space cooperative planning workshop in different cities are presented together with the work done by young offices. Enjoy the reading!
Urban nodes of soft infrastructure in Amsterdam and BerlinNico Janssen
A research study to the initiative, development, functioning, benefits and effects of vibrant social - urban places in Amsterdam and Berlin which stimulate the livability and vitality of neighborhoods, quarters and the city as a whole and are developed by local initiatives (artists, local entrepreneurs, local inhabitants)
Urban Thinkers Campus TU Delft Report, World Urban Forum 9Roberto Rocco
Presentation given ay the World Urban Forum 9 in Kuala Lumpur on the results of the Urban Thinkers Campus held at TU Delft "EDUCATION FOR THE CITY WE NEED", sponsored by the World Urban Campaign, Arcadis and others.
Intelligent school design - english versionVoD_group
VoD platform proposes the postgraduate course “Intelligent school design” in order to give a practical interpretation to the recent D.M. 11/4/2013, guidelines for sustainable design of schools. The course works both in distance learning and in face to face learning. The organization of the course is thus light and interactive, it doesn't interfere with the working activities of the participants. Thou the low cost of participation, it gives a high surplus value, both professional and social, thanks to three final collaborative workshops.
Urban co-creation by Nexthamburg: the "Bremen on the move" (Bremen bewegen) p...Elena Mozgovaya
Presentation of Nexthamburg and one of its projects - Bremen on the move - on the Informed cities forum in Rotterdam, 26.03.2015 (http://informed-cities.iclei-europe.org/)
Prologue to "Better Cities, Better Life" book that is going to be published in the following months.
The Prologue Chapter is called "Urban Innovation: A Decalogue to Explore a City" (Igor Calzada)
Envisioning the City of the Future: Making the Invisible Visible. International Concept and design competition open to students, graduates and experts.
This paper is a report on the recent special session of papers presented at the Regional Studies Association (RSA) Annual Conference in Dublin, entitled ‘Beyond Smart & Data-Driven City-Regions: Rethinking Stakeholder-Helixes Strategies’. The session was a collaboration between the Urban Transformations ESRC programme at the University of Oxford and the Future Cities Catapult.
Connecting Cities, Technologies and Citizens – the Swiss-European-Japanese pr...Stephan Haller
Smart Cities is a lot about connectivity and networking, not just in the technical sense. This talk given at a mini-symposium of the Swiss Informatics Society in May 2019 highlights this using the EU-Japan Horizon 2020 project CPaaS.io.
The full talk is available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/kmh26qUnGh8
Old vs. New Economy. Keynote speech at EUKN EGTC Conference - Civic Economy i...OuiShare
Keynote @Conference on the Civic Economy - Time to get ready Organized by European Urban Knowledge Network (EUKN) in cooperation with the municipality of Amsterdam & Pakhuis de Zwijger. Amsterdam 20.10.2014.
Rebranding Athens: The ABC and Agora Project.SmartCitiesTeam
The ABC and Agora Project is SmartCitiesTeam's value proposition for Athens Rebranding. Get on board!
Athens CoCreation Branding Project
Panteion University Of Social And Political Sciences
Department of Communication, Media and Culture
MA in Cultural Management
Course: Cultural Marketing and Communication
Course Instructor: Betty Tsakarestou, Assistant Professor and Head of Advertising and Public Relations Lab
Woven Air - the beauty and the horrors of urban settlement
This is a photographic exploration of the pattern of cities or ‘urban’ form mainly from the air.
From the early rural start through to future visions cities have been built for access to resources and security, among others. ‘Cities’ also grew based on the means of transport earlier on foot or cart, the present almost exclusively the car and future visions on futuristic transport systems, but also now more with a nod to the climate crisis.
Modern cities, including ‘smart’ cities have seldom been designed with people predominantly in mind.
Thriveable cities will be climate sensitive, carbon (gross) neutral – but with all this in mind cities will be people/nature centric. Designed for people, not mainly transport systems, nor mainly technological systems, etc.
No descriptions or locations of these cities are included – so look at the form, patterns, climate response, and geographic resources. Together with transport or mobility methods, and from these draw your own conclusions of where we should be thinking.
Look at the 24 earlier Urban Books for ideas of what could/should be considered and possible new ideas.
This presenation is part of my application to IE University for September 2017.
I have chosen Question 4: How do you envision the city of the future?
The format chosen is a SlideShare presentation combining text and photographs. All pictures have been taken by myself with a Canon EOS1200 camera.
On November 14th 2016 the Urban Transformations programme, funded by the ESRC, kicked off the first knowledge exchange activity by bringing together academics and practitioners in the research/policy field of urban transformations from all over Europe. This workshop was the first of a series entitled Bridging European Urban Transformations that has been established in partnership between the Urban Transformations programme led by the University of Oxford at COMPAS and the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), particularly with the Brussels Centre for Urban Studies. In this post-Brexit era, commitment and willingness to cooperate seems more important than ever before. Therefore, the workshop series, which runs from November 2016 to October 2017, emphasises the value of connections between institutions and key players in the field of urban transformations in the UK and in the rest of Europe.
Smart City Strategy Platform innovation, data-driven applications and partici...Robin Effing
Presentation at the 2nd International Workshop SISC-DISES in Nice (france). Cities increasingly face challenges regarding participation and collaboration in order to become a “smart city”. The world’s best cities to live in are not the ones with the most advanced technological layers but cities that create an atmosphere where citizens, companies and government together build a vital and sustainable innovation platform. A platform strategy enables cities to engage the most important stakeholders. As a result, quadruple helix innovation contributes to a smarter city. Furthermore, we believe that an open technological infrastructure such as FIWARE is a key enabler for sharing big data from IoT services. In this presentation we present smart city cases from Enschede, Hamburg and Berlin. Furthermore, we show results from our own research projects comprising urban platforms, data visualizations and real-time city dashboards.
Introductory lecture on the Collaborative Economy and attempt to embed into a...Thomas Doennebrink
45 min. lecture as kick-off event for a visitor programme tour of international journalists and academics in Germany on the topic of sharing and collaborative economy organised by the Goethe-Institute and on behalf of the German Federal Foreign Office. Lecture consists on three parts
1.) Introduction to the share- & collaborative economy (areas, developments, phases, drivers, (pre)conditions, collaborative a) consumption b) production c) finance d) learning & open everything, effects, etc.)
2. Attempt to embed into a wider context in form of a juxtaposition of old vs. new economy/society characteristics.
3. Look at the current status (quo) and current trends (quo vadis) of the collaborative economy (collaborative economy 1.0, UBER, AIRBNB et al., Uberisation, monoculture, platform capitalism, collaborative economy 3.0 (platform cooperativism et al.), front end vs. back.
Smart cities as spatial manifestations of 21st century capitalismAraz Taeihagh
Globally, smart cities attract billions of dollars in investment annually, with related market opportunities forecast to grow year-on-year. The enormous resources poured into their development consist of financial capital, but also natural, human and social resources converted into infrastructure and real estate. The latter act as physical capital storage and sites for the creation of digital products and services expected to generate the highest value added. Smart cities serve as temporary spatial fixes until new and better investments opportunities emerge. Drawing from a comprehensive range of publications on capitalism, this article analyzes smart city developments as typifier of 21st century capital accumulation where the financialization of various capitals is the overarching driver and ecological overshoot and socio-economic undershoot are the main negative consequences. It closely examines six spatial manifestations of the smart city – science parks and smart campuses; innovation districts; smart neighborhoods; city-wide and city-regional smart initiatives; urban platforms; and alternative smart city spaces – as receptacles for the conversion of various capitals. It also considers the influence of different national regimes and institutional contexts on smart city developments. This is used, in the final part, to open a discussion about opportunities to temper the excesses of 21st century capitalism.
Highlights
• Recent academic literature on modern capitalism and smart city development are brought together
• Different interpretations and denominations of 21th century capitalism are mapped and synthesized into an overview box
• Six spatial manifestations of the smart city are identified and thoroughly described, with their major institutions, actors and resources
• Five different types of capital (natural, human, social, physical and financial) are mapped, along with an analysis of how further financialization affects conversion processes between them
• Options to mitigate exclusionary tendencies of capitalism in the digital age are explored, based on the varieties of capitalism literature
To prototype our project we will use the Busines Canvas, a tool created by Alexander Osterwalder that visualize the 9 components of a project. It has became really popular and is used in most start up incubators. The Business Canvas allows us to see quickly how every component is interrelated. When we want to set a social enterprise it is equally important what we do and how we do it. Working under the new paradigm of Collaboration have specific consequences in each component: Value proposition: Need or encourage hero´s journey?, Client: Beneficiary or Hero?, Relationship: service provider or Community?, Channel: Transactional or transformational?, Activities: Close or Open for collaboration?, Resources: without soul or an opportunity to activate hero´s journey?, Partnership: Instrumental or shared purpose? Income&Expenses: All free/all paid or freemium?
When will the Internet change our cities like it changed our lives? In the final Things report SMACT and the City we now take the city as the center of Things.
The convergence of bricks and clicks
The report shows how the five basic SMACT technologies are moving the creation of 21st century urban environments into top gear. We provide a status update on Smart Cities today and how developments like Senseable Cities and Cities as a Platform provide both new dynamics and opportunities for blending the digital and the physical infrastructure of our world together. The report provides a analysis of how this is already becoming a reality for retailers and presents what companies and organisations of all trades could learn from the accelerating convergence of bricks and clicks.
From the report:
- The Internet of Things will change our cities.
- The five basic technologies that form SMACT are moving urban development into top gear.
- The digital architecture of the city is becoming a true development platform.
- SMACT will transform the city into a platform to blend bricks and clicks seamlessly together.
- The future of cities is about: platform solutions, pervasive applications, and sensible sensing technologies.
- City as a Platform equals the infrastructural capacity plus the human dimension, the empowerment of behavior through data and applications.
Similar to Smart City vs. Sharing City. Focus Berlin. (20)
Impulsvortrag zu OuiShare am 17.01.2018 im Reallabor Spacesharing der AKB Stuttgart im Rahmen der Reallabor Lounge zum Thema: ökonomische Strukturen für eine Akteurs-basierte Stadtproduktion
Überblick über die Entwicklung der Sharing- & Kollaborative Ökonomie als Einstieg zur Learning Journey zum Thema Plattform Kooperativen der ADG nach Berlin
Presentation sur l'économie collaborative. "Partage au lieu de l'achat. Moins de déchets par moins de consommation?"
dans le cadre du projet "Baladiya - nouvelles voies dans le développement urbain", effectuée par "Europäische Akademie Berlin" à l'initiative et avec le soutien de la Robert Bosch Stiftung, et en étroite collaboration avec la GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH / Société allemande pour la coopération internationale. S'adress aux urbanistes algériens, marocains et tunisiens. (31.01. 2018)
PeerSharing - Internetgestützte Geschäftsmodelle für gemeinschaftlichen Konsu...Thomas Doennebrink
Wie grün, wie nachhaltig, wie dynamisch … ist die Sharing Economy? Dies waren die zentralen drei Fragen des dreijährigen Forschungsprojektes “PeerSharing – Internetgestützte Geschäftsmodelle für gemeinschaftlichen Konsum als Beitrag zum nachhaltigen Wirtschaften“ welches das Teilen von Privat zu Privat (Peer-to-Peer Sharing) untersuchte. Gefördert wurde das Forschungsprojekt vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, koordiniert vom Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IÖW) im Verbund mit den Instituten für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung (IZT) in Berlin und für Energie- und Umweltforschung (IFEU) in Heidelberg.
Dieses Dokument besteht aus zwei Teilen. Im ersten Teil werden die einzelnen Veröffentlichungen und Ergebnisse – in Gruppen zusammengefasst und in Kurzform – aufgelistet. Somit ergibt sich ein schneller Überblick über das Gesamtwerk, und über die eingebundenen Links können Interessierte schnell an entsprechenden Stellen in die dahinterliegenden ausführlichen Dokumentationen eintauchen. Sie behandeln unter anderem Definitionsfragen und eine Bestandsaufnahme des P2P Sharings, Ergebnisse qualitativer und quantitativer Befragungen, Szenarien zu Zukünften des P2P Sharings, Nachhaltige Entwicklungsperspektiven für Geschäftsmodelle des P2P Sharings u.a.
Im zweiten Teil wird ausführlicher auf einzelne Veröffentlichungen eingegangen. Schwerpunkt wird hierbei gelegt auf die Themenbereiche: Kontroversen ums Teilen, Kontexte des Teilens, und Kompromisse des Teilens (wobei es um Nachhaltige Governance von Peer-to-Peer Sharing Praktiken geht), sowie um die Ökologie des Teilens. Jeweils am Anfang steht zunächst eine möglichst objektive Zusammenfassung bzw. Präsentation von Schlüsselergebnissen. Abgetrennt durch den Vermerk “Hervorhebung:” folgt dann jeweils eine selektive und subjektive Auswahl aus den Veröffentlichungen - und deren teilweise Kommentierung - aus der Sicht des Autors dieses Artikels, ein Vertreters der Praxis/Fach-Community, der in dieser Eigenschaft das Forschungsprojekt begleitet hat. Was erscheint aus diesem Blickwinkel und für diesen Kontext besonders informativ und erhellend? Was ist sprachlich und terminologisch gut formuliert? Was möchte diskutiert und kommentiert werden?
Sharing Economy 3.0 Potenziale & Herausforderungen
(Impulsvortrag am 20. Oktober 2017 im Umweltbundesministerium, Berlin.
Im Rahmen der Abfallvermeidungsdialoge: Abfallvermeidung durch neue Nutzungsformen)
Keynote on the 24.03. @Fourth Conference on Good Economy in Zagrep Croatia organized by ZMAG Green Network of Activist Groups. Sponsored by République Francaise, Rosa Luxemburg, Goethe Institut & Institut ZA Politicku Ekologiju.
Article about the keynote published in Croatian newspaper: http://www.vecernji.hr/gospodarstvo/napustamo-eru-konkurentnosti-i-ulazimo-u-eru-kolaborativnosti-1158925
Next evolution of the Sharing Economy - One-pager in Baltic-Air-MagazinThomas Doennebrink
Interviewed by airline magazine about next evolution of the Sharing Economy and released as a one-pager trend article in the February 2017 edition of the Baltic Air Magazin.
Externe key note “Sharing Economy – Praxiserfahrungen von Ouishare“ zum Cluster-Workshops „Collaborative/sharing Economy“ im Rahmen der Wissenschaftichen Koordination der Fördermaßnahme „Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften" (NaWiKo).
Am 5. Dezember 2016 im Ecologic Institut, Pfalzburger Str. 43-44 10717 Berlin.
http://ecologic.eu/
#BuyTwitter? German newspaper taz has been there, done that.Thomas Doennebrink
Users want to unite as a cooperative and buy Twitter. This is exactly what saved the German newspaper Taz 25 years ago – and has kept it in good shape to this day.
Article by Thomas Dönnebrink on https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/
Rückkehr der Genossenschaften: Aufbau der nächsten Generation der Sharing Ökö...Thomas Doennebrink
Im Rahmen des 4-tägigen OuiShareFest#4 in Paris zum Oberthema „After the Gold Rush“ fand ein 90-minütiger Workshop zum Thema Plattform Cooperativismus statt unter dem Titel: „Rückkehr der Genossenschaften: Aufbau der nächsten Generation der Sharing Ökonomie“. Ca. 80 Personen nahmen an der Veranstaltung teil.
Der 90-minütige Workshop bestand aus drei Teilen. Einer Einführung und Überblickaussicht der Kuratoren und Moderatorinnen der Veranstaltung folgten Kurzpräsentationen von jeweils 5 min von den Gründern bzw. Direktoren der Unternehmungen: Part-up, SMartBE, Enercoop, Resecond und Fairmondo. Im zweiten Teil und Hauptpunkt der Veranstaltung wurden zunächst im Plenum die besonderen Interessen herausgearbeitet und sodann die fünf Arbeitsgruppen gebildet zu den folgenden Themen: Politische Steuerung und Koordination (Governance), Beziehung: Plattform & NutzerInnen (Relationship: platform & user), Werte und Verbreitung (Values & Distribution), Geschäftsmodelle, Finanzierung und Technologie (Business Model, Finance & Technology) sowie Mutualisierung (Mutualization). In einem kurzen dritten Teil stellten die Arbeitsgruppen ihre Ergebnisse vor und die Veranstaltung schloss mit einem Aufruf zum Handeln.
Plattform Kooperativismus als Antwort auf den Plattform KapitalismusThomas Doennebrink
Deutsche Übersetzung der Präsentationen zum Thema Plattform Kooperativismus bzw. Digitale Kooperativen während Events auf Tenerife und in México Stadt. Erklärung, Geschichte, Einbettung, Appell.
10 min Impuls presentation at the Federal Environment Agency in Berlin about Sharing Cities - with special focus on differences to Smart Cities characteristics and a potential analysis done on the sharing and collaborative economy in Berlin end of 2014 with the subtitle: From a Divided to a Sharing City: Berlin on its way to a Sharing City. The presentation includes a short overview of the different chapters giving the contextualisation and suggesting indicators (I), presents actors in Berlin via a mapping and classification (II), some results from the survey (III), one example of Sharing Cities (IV), generell and more precise recommendations of actions (V) as well as further information about Sharing City networks, Sharing City Amsterdam, two examples of City Government as a Provider of items to share (Paris & Barcelona) and a final case for the fostering Sharing Cities and the Civic Economy/Society. (Some information about OuiShare and the speaker at the end).
Solidarität 3.0 - Solidarität in der Kollaborativen ÖkonomieThomas Doennebrink
Nach einem Überblick über die Kollaborative Ökonomie, ihre diversenen Bereiche, Phasen, Treiber, Vorbedingungen, werden drei Ausformungen der Kollaborativen Ökonomie dargestellt und mit den Begriffen: Kollaborative Ökonomie 1.0, 2.0 & 3.0 bezeichnet und mit Beispielen dargestellt. Während in der Kollaborativen Ökonomie 1.0 nicht-monetäre Beweggründe im Vordergrund standen, gerieten diese in der Kollaborativen Ökononomie im besten Fall in den Hintergrund und machten dem dominierenden Beweggrund: Profitmaximierung und Monopolanstrebung Platz. In der Kollaborativen Ökonomie 3.0 ergeben sich nun wieder Chancen, dass diverse Formen der Solidarität wieder Einzug halten in die Kollaborative Ökonomie, bzw. in diese eingearbeitet werden.
AIRBNB/UBER ... was yesterday - PlatformCooperativism ... will be tomorrowThomas Doennebrink
Where the Sharing Economy meets PlatformCooperativism the Collaborative Economy 3.0 begins.
Cooperativism in general & cooperative banking associations in particular have the potential to give the rapidly changing economy and society an URGENTLY needed and
in the meantime by more and more people wished turn, as they have two aces up their sleeves which are strongly needed by platform cooperatives and can give them leverage, and would help to co-create the necessary and supportive ecosystem: millions of members and billions of capital. What is still lacking is the knowledge, willingness and the action.
Airbnb ... war gestern - PlatformCoops ... sind morgenThomas Doennebrink
Sharing & Collaborative Economy trifft auf das Genossenschaftswesen im Allgemeinen und das Genossenschaftsbankwesen im Besonderen.
Willkommen zum Platform Kooperativismus und zur Kollaborativen Ökonomie 3.0.
Das Genossenschaftswesen im Allgemeinen
und die Genossenschaftsbanken im Besonderen
haben das Potential der sich rasant verändernden Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft
eine dringend benötigte neue Richtung zu geben,
den sie haben zwei Joker im Ärmel
welche die Plattform Kooperativen dringend benötigen
und ihnen zum Durchbruch verhelfen können und helfen die notwendigen unterstützenden Ökosysteme mitzugestalten: Millionen von Mitgliedern & Milliarden an Kapital. Was noch fehlt ist das Wissen, der Wille und das Tun.
This #PlatformCoopBerlin report comprises an introduction into the notion of platform cooperativism, references and links to main activists, activities and further readings. You’ll also find a report on the first #platformCoopBerlin meet-up in Berlin on the 04.03.2016, including a transcript of Michel Bauwen’s speech at this gathering. This article might be useful for whoever wants to get a basic or better understanding of platform cooperativism. People intending to organise a #PlatformCoopX meetup in their own city or researching about the subject will also find helpful information, links and contacts
Inmersión en las plataformas cooperativas digitales - platform cooperativismThomas Doennebrink
Slides of Workshop: "Inmersion en las plataformas cooperativas digitales" during the OuiShareFest Barcelona (20.11.2015).
http://ouisharefestbcn2015.sched.org/event/05abb7bcff46dca84018b72058a39cd7
Intention of the workshop: take the idea for the platform cooperativism conference of the New School in NYC (see: http://platformcoop.net/) and plant, discuss, disseminate and further develop it during successive events in Europe.
Links:
Workshop Follow-up FB Group https://www.facebook.com/groups/908775275826716/
Platform Cooperativism Conference http://platformcoop.net/
Rise of the Digital Cooperative FB Group https://www.facebook.com/groups/897768210315282/
OuiShare http://ouishare.net/en/908775275826716/
2015 09-28 Präsentation Share or Die - B.A.U.M.-Jahrestagung 2015Thomas Doennebrink
B.A.U.M.-Jahrestagung und Preisverleihung 28./29.09.2015
Forum 3 "Share Economy - Ist Sharing Lösung oder Problem?“. Moderiert von
Prof. Carsten Herbes, GF-Direktor ISR Hochschule Wirtschaft & Umwelt Nürtingen-Geislingen.(http://www.baumev.de/Teilnehmer - http://www.baumev.de/Referenten.html)
Die Power von Null
UBER Nach 6 Jahren die weltweit größte Taxifirma - > 140 Mio. Fahrten in 2014 - besitzt NULL eigene Autos.- Börsenwert 41 Mrd.$
FACEBOOK Nach 11 Jahren die weltweit populärste Medienplattform produziert NULL eigenen content – Börsenwert 184 Mrd $
ALIBABA - Nach 15 Jahren der weltweit wertvollste Retailer hat NULL eigenes Inventar – Börsenwert 210 Mrd $
AIRBNB - Nach 7 Jahren weltweit größter Übernachtungsanbieter - > 23 Mio. Gäste/J besitzt NULL eigene Immobilien 20 Mrd $
1. These
Der Vorteil von gestern wird zum Nachteil von morgen.
Früher brachten eigene Assets i.d.R. Vorteile. Heute können die damit verbundenen (hohen) Fixkosten, (starre) Bürokratien & (schwerfällige) Hierarchien zum Mühlstein werden.
2. These
Wenn ihr Geschäftsmodell einzig basiert auf dem Abverkauf Ihrer (eigenen) Produkte werden Sie in wenigen Jahren prozentual einen spürbar geringeren Marktanteil haben –
Wenn es Ihr Unternehmen dann noch gibt.
3. These
Es gibt eine Verschiebung in die folgende Richtung:
Produkt -> Service -> Marktplatz -> Plattform (-> Commons)
Firmen die sich und Ihr Geschäftsmodell daraufhin ausrichten werden in Zukunft besser dastehen als diejenigen, welche diese Entwicklung verschlafen.
@pentagrowth von Javier Creus, Vordenker aus Barcelona,
Es fasst in 5 Hebeln die Schlüsseldimensionen zusammen: Netzwerke, Inventare, User (nicht Konsumenten), Partner (nicht Konkurrenten), Wissen
Für Netzwork gilt der Appell: Connect: Je größer die Anzahl der Knotenpunkte (nodes) die eine Entität in der Lage ist zu verknüpfen, desto größer das Wachstumspotential
(hier in der wachsenden Gradierung: sozial, mobile, IOT)
2. Für das Inventar gilt der Appell: Collect : Je geringer der interne Aufwand, den eine Entität braucht um verfügbares Inventar aufzubauen, desto größer das Wachstumspotential(hier in der wachsenden Gradierung: Zentralisiert, dezentralisiert, Commons)
3. Für die Nutzer gilt der Appell: Empower: Je mehr eine Entität die Kapazitäten der Nutzer nutzen kann, desto größer das Wachstumspotential
(hier in der wachsenden Gradierung: Nutzer (1 Rolle), Nutzer/Produzent (2 Rollen) Mehrere/beliebige Rollen)
4. Für die Partner gilt der Appell: Enable: Je größer die Anzahl der Partner die das von der Entität bereitgestellte tool nutzen um ihr eigenes Geschäft aufzubauen, desto größer das Wachstumspotential (hier in der wachsenden Gradierung: Zur Verfügungstellung, Co-Märkte, Co-Kreierung)
5. Und für das Wissen gilt der Appell: Share: Je größer die community, die einen Gemeinschaftsinn mit dem Ressourcenbesitz der Entität entwickelt (Identifikation), desto größer das Wachstumspotential
This presentation by Morris Kleiner (University of Minnesota), was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Have you ever wondered how search works while visiting an e-commerce site, internal website, or searching through other types of online resources? Look no further than this informative session on the ways that taxonomies help end-users navigate the internet! Hear from taxonomists and other information professionals who have first-hand experience creating and working with taxonomies that aid in navigation, search, and discovery across a range of disciplines.
0x01 - Newton's Third Law: Static vs. Dynamic AbusersOWASP Beja
f you offer a service on the web, odds are that someone will abuse it. Be it an API, a SaaS, a PaaS, or even a static website, someone somewhere will try to figure out a way to use it to their own needs. In this talk we'll compare measures that are effective against static attackers and how to battle a dynamic attacker who adapts to your counter-measures.
About the Speaker
===============
Diogo Sousa, Engineering Manager @ Canonical
An opinionated individual with an interest in cryptography and its intersection with secure software development.
Acorn Recovery: Restore IT infra within minutesIP ServerOne
Introducing Acorn Recovery as a Service, a simple, fast, and secure managed disaster recovery (DRaaS) by IP ServerOne. A DR solution that helps restore your IT infra within minutes.
Sharpen existing tools or get a new toolbox? Contemporary cluster initiatives...Orkestra
UIIN Conference, Madrid, 27-29 May 2024
James Wilson, Orkestra and Deusto Business School
Emily Wise, Lund University
Madeline Smith, The Glasgow School of Art
Getting started with Amazon Bedrock Studio and Control Tower
Smart City vs. Sharing City. Focus Berlin.
1. Sharing City (Berlin)
Impulse discourse 10 min
Thomas Dönnebrink
OuiShare Connector Germany
Freelancer Collaborative Economy
@TDoennebrink thomas@ouishare.net
21./22. June 2016 UBA (Federal Environment Agendy) Berlin,
Bismarckplatz 1, Raum 1134
In the context of the waste avoidance talks:
waste avoidance through new usage forms
2. Smart City / Definition
Quelle: http://www.4sustainability.de/fileadmin/redakteur/Publikationen/Loew-Rohde_Wiener-Smart_City-Definition_Betrachtungen-zur-Verwendung2015.pdf
3. Sharing City
I consider it very important to highlight the gaps between the Sharing City and the Smart City.
A first definition attempt for the Smart City was done 2011 in Vienna. Since then it was quoted and
borrowed repeatedly in presentations and subject books or further developed in neighbouring
Switzerland and Germany.
Here the beginning of the DIN /DKE definition of 2014 (translation)
„Smart City referes to a settlement area in which sustainable products, services, technology, processes
and infrastructure is applied systemically (ecological, social and economic) as a rule be backed-up by
highly integrated and interconnected information and communication technologies.“
4. Smart City Berlin
Quelle: http://www.berlin-partner.de/standort-berlin/smart-city-berlin/
Actors/Driver:
Public – Private Partnership: esp. large Corporations/Organisations
Approach/Philosopy/World view:
top – down, technocratic, technological, IOT, economic, paternalistic
Citizen:
passive – dependent – monitored/surveilled - consumeristic
5. Let‘s have a closer look at the Smart City approach of Berlin.
Here a few statements by one of the main driver in the city: berlin-partner: (translated)
„There is a clear political confession for Berlin as a smart city“
„On April 2015 the Berlin Senate has decided Smart-City-Strategy Berlin.“
Build out of the international competitiveness of the metropol region Berlin-Brandenburg, the increase
of the resource efficiency and climate neutrality until the year 2050.“
Or equally on the same internetsite:
„the network Smart City Berlin is a working group with more than 100 enterprises, science and
research entities initiated by the Berlin Partner for economy and technology ltd....“
Revealing also the cover ot the Smart City edition of the Berlin Partner journal/brochure.
Visible on the coverpage: city skyline, curve shapes, cloud, app & tech icons, accompagnied by the
following teaser: Industry 4.0, to take a look at the fourth revolution with GE. – Cisco, the goals of the
IT-giant at the site of Berlin – Greentech Award reward green innovations – and „An interview with the
chairman of DB Station & Service“
That pictures the actors/driver behind the Smart City Initiatives, their approach/philosophy/world
view and the role they contribute to the citizens as follows:
Actors/Driver:
Public – Private Partnership: esp. Large corporations/organisations
Approach/Philosopy/World view:
top – down, technocratic, technological, IOT, economic, paternalistic
Citizen:
passive – dependent – monitored/surveilled - consumeristic
6. Sharing City / Definition
Sharing City Berlin
Actors/Driver:
Public – Civic Partnership (multistakeholder)
Approach/Philosopy/World view:
bottom – up, collaborative, (techno-social), participatory
Citizens:
(pro)active – contributive – responsible - inclusive
7. In reference to Sharing City. Looking for Sharing City in Wikipedia is futile.
No entry is found neither in German nor in English.
Therefore we borrow the definition of Amsterdam, the first city in Europe that officially declared
themself a Sharing City.:
„Amsterdam Sharing City recognizes the sharing economy as a key driver of sustainable and
economically resilient city rich in social capital and acknowledges the need to consider sharing
economy principles and incorporate them in the process of recreating the political, economic and
social landscape.“
From this definition and my own understanding I derive the following characteristics for a Sharing City,
which distinguishes it partly quite clearly from Smart Cities:
Actors/Driver:
Public – Civic Partnership (multistakeholder)
Approach/Philosopy/World view:
bottom – up, collaborative, (techno-social), participatory
Citizens:
(pro)active – contributive – responsible – inclusive
Looking at the ambassadors forming part of the Amsterdam Sharing City, one find among the actors
also Amsterdam Smart City. In this case – and IMHO it should be the way – Smart City is a component
of a Sharing City.
8. Sharing City vs. Smart City
„A revolution doesn‘t happen
when society adopts new tools, it happens
When society adopts new behaviour“
Clay Shirky
„It is the need to design a system
that puts all that technology truly at the service of the inhabitants
— and not the other way around.“
Saskia Sassen
9. And in order to emphasize once more the important distinction of the Sharing City vs. The Smart City –
also in view of the question one should start out with: WHY one does or wants to do something and
than think about HOW one wants to or should do it before dealing with the WHAT.
Here two quotes:
1. Clay Shirky, author, consultant and and teacher on the social and economic effects of Internet
technologies: „A revolution doesn’t happen when society adopts new tools. It happens when society
adopts new behaviors“
2. Or similar, Saskia Sassen, sociologist with focus on globalisation and international human migration.:
“It is the need to design a system that puts all that technology truly at the service of the inhabitants—
and not the other way around.”
10. Potential analysis of the Sharing &
Collaborative Economy in Berlin
Chapters
I: Contextualisation of the Share Economy
II: Capture of the Berlin Actors/ Mapping
III: Results of the Online Questionnaire
IV: International Sharing Cities
V: Guidance / Recommendations
VI: Résumé
11. End of 2014 there was some interest coming out of the Senate Department for Economics, Technology
and Research to investigate the potential of the sharing and collaborative economy in the city.
As a four-member-team we were commission to write a small potential analysis.
We gave the final 30+ page paper the title:
From the divided to the sharing city. Berlin on its way to a Sharing City.
I was asked to also present the study here. I will just give a short overview.
If interested you can find the potential analysis – a bit hidden and just recently made available after a
political inquiry and having been stored away in a drawer for 15 months – here:
berlin.de/sen/wirtschaft or Sharingberlin.de/potenzialanalyse
13. Chapter I
Beginning with a contextualization and the definition of the Sharing & Collaborative Economy.
(Here our division: Collaborative ... 1) ... Consumption 2) ... Production 3) ... Financing 4) ... Knowledge
Unter the heading: Prospect ... of the global future / ... Of the urban future follows a short assessment
of the further development in the global context and in urban areas.
Given the upcoming decades will be characterized globally by climate crisis and resource scarcity on
the one hand and more people moving into urban areas on the other hand, the key to the solution of
these problems lie especially in the cities.
14. Potential Analysis
I. Indicators
Suggesting 15 Indicators as evaluation criteria
1. Adding value locally (v.s skimming value locally)
2. Fostering resilience (v.s. crisis prone)
3. Strewing ownership (fairer) (v.s. concentrating ownership)
4. Extending/multiplying options & roles (v.s. reducing option and roles)
5. Self-determination & participation (v.s. heteronomy)
6. Self-design/formation & co-creation (v.s. unalterable preconfiguration)
7. Promoting community & relationships / including (v.s. isolating/excluding)
8. Versatile/collaborative/communal use (v.a. exclusive/individual use (sale&one-way product)
9. Openess & transparency (v.s silo & intransparency)
10. Horizontal (peer) structure (v.s. hierarchical structures)
11. Saving/protecting resources (circular economy) (v.s. consuming/wasting resources)
12. Partizipation- & Co-creation diversity beyond money (v.s. only via money)
13. Building trust (v.s. isolation, spreading mistrust)
14. Common good oriented (vs. particular interests)
15. Basic needs (vs. luxury demand)
15. In the last part of the first chapter 15 indicators are proposed as evaluation criteria
for the Sharing & Collaborative Economy.
IMHO these apprear also helpful/desirable for the definition and normative description of Sharing
Cities respectively.
This goes back to the previously addressed crucial question WHY? E.g. guidelines.
For examples see previous slide
Following bitly.com/Indicators-CollaborativeEconomy one can find more information
and is welcomed to leave comments.
17. In chapter II
follows a capture of the Berlin actors.
As easy to read from the map with its about 200 Share enterprises and initiatives – which the mapping
initiative „SharingBerlin“ has listed and which can be accessed via www.sharingberlin.de – Berlin
belongs worldwide to the cities with a big diversity of enterprises and undertakings in the field of the
Share & Collaborative Economy.
A short outline of these entities: small – big, non-commercial – commercial, follows.
The mapping distingushes the following nine areas
Work & Activities
Energy
Items
Money & other transaction systems
Community formation and self-organisation
Mobility
Food
Space
Knowledge
19. In chapter III
Results from a questionnaire of 90 Berlin actors of the Share & Collaborative Economy are presented.
Just some results:
The mayority are focusing on saving resources, climate protection and strengthening the
neighbourhood culture.
Most of the entities were founded in the last two years before the questionnaire took place and the
entities were in average not older than two years.
The community expects a rapid growth for the upcoming years.
20. Potential Analysis
IV: International Sharing Cities
Downtown Seoul. Foto: Craig Nagy, Wikimedia Commons Gemeinschaftsgarten auf der Insel Nodul. Foto: Chang-Woo Lee
Examples from
SEOUL/SAN FRANCISCO/BARCELONA/AMSTERDAM/
KOPENHAGEN/GHENT/HELSINKI/VANCOUVER/BERLIN
21. Chapter IV
It follows some impression from some Sharing Cities / aspects worldwide.
In juxtaposition with Seoul and San Francisco,
Berlin seems to have the highest potential in the creative and social-innovative community –
unfortunately this potential currently doesn‘t meet support from the city government side.
Here some pictures of Seoul, which publicly declared itself the first Sharing City of the world
in order to react with this approach to urban problems like smog, waste production, traffic jams,
parking & housing scarcity, resource wastefulness, poverty, young unemployment
but above all high suicide rates, overaging and loneliness.
Exempli gratia the Seoul Metropolitan Government Act for Promoting Sharing
promoting 20 Sharing programmes and policies: Support of sharing startups, communal car sharing,
public provision of tools, spaces, data, urban gardens etc. (going beyond the scope of our time frame)
22. Potential Analysis
V. Guidance/Recommendations
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Noticing & raise awareness
2. Understanding & differentiating
3. Regulating & deregulating
4. Value, display & promote
5. Cooperate & integrate
6. Profiling & reacting proactively
CONCRETE RECOMMENDATIONS (SELECTION)
1. Cross departmental working groups
2. On- & Offline platforms for collaboration
3. Bills promoting citizens engagement
non-profit & cooperative legal forms
4. Alliance of European Sharing Cities
5. Initiation of European Sharing City Resolution
6. Quality seal of eco-social products
23. In Chapter V general and concrete recommendations are made.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Noticing & raising awareness
2. Understanding & differentiating
3. Regulating & deregulating
4. Valuing, displaying & promoting
5. Cooperating & integrating
6. Profiling & reacting proactively
Here some of the concrete recommendations applying to the city, federal and EU level.
25. You can find further activities about Sharing Cities initiatives in dozends of cities within the Sharing
Cities Network of the Onine Magazin Shareable.
They are also organizing maps jams for gathering all the initiatives. With SharingBerlinMap and
Transformap we also have co-initiated and accompanied own summarizing mappings here.
27. And finally some examples. It would be highly recommendable (and maybe there are people in the
room here that are already working on it or could give it a push) to launch a best-practice study and
aggregate, connect and support best-practice expertise, projects and networks in this field.
Amsterdam was already mentioned as the first European City that publicly declared themselves a
Sharing City. An initiative more emerging from the civic society, startup scene, but also meeting with a
positive resonance from the city government.
In order to promote the good and reduce the bad a 5 phases plan was collectively developped. (in
bullet point form)
1. Stimulation of the Sharing Economy by collaborators and promotion of pilot projects that tackle
urban problem fields.
2. City-owned Sharing projects: vehicles, spaces
3. Safeguarding of the inclusion of all citizens through partnerships, e.g. citypass system
4. Regulating/Deregulating of sharing economy for the public benefit
5. Profiling as a Sharing City and participation at international events
28. Sharing City
City Government Provider
By Daniel*D CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3001563By Mariordo (Mario Roberto Durán Ortiz) – CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=19761037
By Hank_chapot GFDL, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=13560663
29. And finally to kick in some figures concerning city government provision
of sharing services of two cities
Paris was the first major city in Europa that - as a municipal provider –
stepped large scale into bike- and carsharing.
Vélib *15.07.2007: 14.500 bikes (Top12 - (17/Top 18 are Chinese cities)
The bikes are available at 1230 stations (Top3 – about every 300 m) (e.g.. 1 bike per 97 inhabitants)
>285,000 yearly subscribers (2014) –
financed/organised by JCDecaux – a trade-off for public advertising rights.
1 year: 20 Mio. – until 6. Jahr (2013?) 173 Mio journeys
AutoLib *12.2011: 2500 cars – 4000 charging stations (July 2014) –
>155.000 yearly subscribers
(AutoLib also operates in Lyon, Bordeaux, Brüssel, London, Indianapolis)
worldwide >600 cities with Bike Sharing models (July 2014)
Bicing *22.03. 2007 in Barcelona. 6000 bikes – 420 stations (every 300 – 400 m).
Same bikes and stations like in Stockholm, Oslo and Zaragoza
financed through car parking in public space.
Also worth mentioning is the Mayors Challenge of Bloomberg Philantropies handing out one 5
millionen $ and four 1 millionen $ prizes to cities for innovative ideas/projects.
31. Or here a brochure in Sydney explaining the Sharing Economy by taking a 48 hour course through
various activities and services of the Shared Economy.
32. Plea for
Sharing City & Civic Society
„When artist and innovators engage, cities thrieve. Cities as platforms“ / Lisa Gansky
Raise awareness for what is happening in the
Sharing Economy. Bring community together and
invite people from all walks of life: entrepreneurs,
NGOs, activists, administrators, engaged citizens.
Build up relationships across all sectors.
Focus the question on: „How can we see and
extend the city as a sharing platform“?
And then – after introductory and contextualising
input and with the help of professional facilitators
let all participants organize and find solutions
themselves in open space formats.
And finally throw a big party to celebrate
what has been achieved collectively.“
Neal Gorenflo
33. I want to close with a plea for Sharing Cities and an increased orientation to a civic society.
Here two final quotes
Lisa Gansky, entrepreneur and author of the best-seller: The Mesh: Why the Future of Business is
Sharing.“
„When artist and innovators engage, cities thrieve. Cities as platforms“ / Lisa Gansky
Or the advice of Neal Gorenflo, publisher of the Online Magazine Shareable addressing my question
how to best approach a sharing city (2014)
Raise awareness for what is happening in the Sharing Economy.
Bring the community together and invite people from all walks of life:
entrepreneurs, NGOs, activists, administrators, engaged citizens.
Build up relationships across all sectors.
Focus the question on: „How can we see and extend the city as a sharing platform“?
And then – after introductory and contextualising input and with the help of professional facilitators let
all participants organize and find solutions themselves in open space formats.
And finally throw a big party to celebrate what has been achieved collectively.“
Neal Gorenflo
34. Vielen Dank!
Thomas Dönnebrink
OuiShare Connector Germany
Freelancer Collaborative Economy
www.about.me/thomasdoennebrink
thomas@ouishare.net
@tdoennebrink
+49 176 32335744
35. About Thomas Dönnebrink
lives in Berlin, OuiShare Connector and Freelancer. Current focus on the characteristics of new and old
economy and the convergence of ideas, concepts and movements in the context of the unfolding
transformation of our economy and society in general and of platform cooperativism – as one field
where convergence is taking place - in particular.
LinkedIn Profil - thomas@ouishare.net - @tdoennebrink - +49 176 32335744
36. Community Building
1 Magazin ouishare.net
4 Globale Konferenzen
2 Touren (LATAM/Europa
8 Internationale Summits
100+ Facebook Gruppen
200+ OuiShare Events
2000+ Mitglieder
34000+ Facebook Fans
> 30 cities in Europa, Lateinamerica & Near Osten
4. Internationale Konferenz. 18.-21.Mai 2016
“After the Gold Rush”
37. About OuiShare
OuiShare originated four years ago in Paris out of a blog around the topic of collaborative
consumption.
In the meantime it has developed into an international peer-network with several thousand members
and the object of study increasingly broadens becoming more holistic.
As a movement, think and do-tank OuiShare has organized by now several hundred events in a few
dozens cities in Europe, the Americas and the Near East.
Since 2013 the three-day OuiShareFest takes place in Paris in May. As biggest event around the
collaborative economy and society it attracts each year more than 1000+ participants and experts from
around the world.
Values
Openness – Transparency – Independence – Impact – Feedback –
Action – MPRL (Meet People in Real Life) – PermanentBeta – Inclusion - Play