This document summarizes a webinar about transitioning from an early career award to obtaining an R01 grant.
The webinar outlines the major challenges of this transition, including taking on more managerial responsibilities. It recommends creating a strategic plan with draft aims and approaches to guide work towards an R01. Managing time effectively through prioritizing, delegating tasks, and protecting writing time is also discussed. Building a research team and securing additional funding sources to supplement startup funds are key steps to lay the foundation for a successful R01 application. Refining specific aims, approaches, the investigator section and choosing the right research questions increase the chances of securing this important first grant.
A series of modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
New improved version of Writing Project Proposals in February 2014.
Agenda:
* Set Your Objectives & Strategies
* Planning The Date, Location, Topic & Time
* Marketing & Sales Coordination
* Marketing Execution: Registration Form & Invitation
* Seminar Presentation
* Day of the Event Logistics
* After the Event Follow-Through
* Resources
Program Project, or P01, grants support multifaceted, long-term research programs with a major objective or theme. Program Project Grants involve the organized efforts of relatively large groups, often from multiple disciplines, wishing to collaborate by bringing together their know-how and resources. P01s are designed to meet the needs of projects whose end goal could not be achieved by investigators working independently. Additionally, the interactions and/or core facilities made possible by the P01 strengthen the individual projects of each of the members.
Getting the seal of approval from reviewers for a P01 project requires a strong leader and masterful organization, among other key elements. To succeed, you must convince reviewers of the synergy and added value resulting from this type of collaboration. Integration of all the moving parts into the whole takes time, careful planning and unparalleled management skills.
During this partnership-driven Webinar, your expert presenter will go over the basic structure of P01s, the importance of reading and following the directions, the strong focus on management, and the justification for cores for the P01. Selection and integration of the projects will be covered as will how to emphasize the synergy of the work to be done.
5 Key Take-Aways:
1. Basic structure of P01 applications
2. Management that sells the proposal
3. How to get people in the program to work together so that the plan can be integrated
4. How to justify the need for certain cores
5. How to find the right niche for a P01
Human Alchemy - Turning people and projects into Gold - Why adopting Benefit...Youssef Mourra
The underlying objective of the slides are to provide an understanding on how Benefits Management can be rolled out in an organisation in a pragmatic and yet powerful manner. Too many organisations are holding back as they continue to fiddle and tinker while trying to implement the perfect model. Perfection will always be an impediment to progress. These slides remind all those involved with projects that we must always ask and answer the question ‘why are we proposing this project and what benefits will accrue as a result?'.
A series of modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
New improved version of Writing Project Proposals in February 2014.
Agenda:
* Set Your Objectives & Strategies
* Planning The Date, Location, Topic & Time
* Marketing & Sales Coordination
* Marketing Execution: Registration Form & Invitation
* Seminar Presentation
* Day of the Event Logistics
* After the Event Follow-Through
* Resources
Program Project, or P01, grants support multifaceted, long-term research programs with a major objective or theme. Program Project Grants involve the organized efforts of relatively large groups, often from multiple disciplines, wishing to collaborate by bringing together their know-how and resources. P01s are designed to meet the needs of projects whose end goal could not be achieved by investigators working independently. Additionally, the interactions and/or core facilities made possible by the P01 strengthen the individual projects of each of the members.
Getting the seal of approval from reviewers for a P01 project requires a strong leader and masterful organization, among other key elements. To succeed, you must convince reviewers of the synergy and added value resulting from this type of collaboration. Integration of all the moving parts into the whole takes time, careful planning and unparalleled management skills.
During this partnership-driven Webinar, your expert presenter will go over the basic structure of P01s, the importance of reading and following the directions, the strong focus on management, and the justification for cores for the P01. Selection and integration of the projects will be covered as will how to emphasize the synergy of the work to be done.
5 Key Take-Aways:
1. Basic structure of P01 applications
2. Management that sells the proposal
3. How to get people in the program to work together so that the plan can be integrated
4. How to justify the need for certain cores
5. How to find the right niche for a P01
Human Alchemy - Turning people and projects into Gold - Why adopting Benefit...Youssef Mourra
The underlying objective of the slides are to provide an understanding on how Benefits Management can be rolled out in an organisation in a pragmatic and yet powerful manner. Too many organisations are holding back as they continue to fiddle and tinker while trying to implement the perfect model. Perfection will always be an impediment to progress. These slides remind all those involved with projects that we must always ask and answer the question ‘why are we proposing this project and what benefits will accrue as a result?'.
Strengthening Design Research Moderating SkillsSusan Mercer
Slides from a talk that I gave for the Boston CHI meeting on April 9, 2013.
Moderating usability studies and interviewing research participants is more than just reading questions off of a page - it's about having a conversation.
In this talk I discuss why it's important to have a conversation with participants and how to do so in a way that encourages them to talk honestly.
I also discuss how to maintain neutrality and minimize introducing bias into the conversation.
There were many issues that received a lot of attention during the 2015 legislative session. How did the legislature’s actions affect your business? We can help you understand the session’s impacts.
What are the legislature’s plans for 2016? How can you protect your business during the upcoming legislative study sessions and the 2016 legislative session?
K-to-R Workshop: A Tactical Approach to Writing Your ProposalUCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K-to_R Workshop, October 29, 2015
Presenter:
Karol Watson, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Co-Director, UCLA Program in Preventive Cardiology
Director, UCLA Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Health Program
Strengthening Design Research Moderating SkillsSusan Mercer
Slides from a talk that I gave for the Boston CHI meeting on April 9, 2013.
Moderating usability studies and interviewing research participants is more than just reading questions off of a page - it's about having a conversation.
In this talk I discuss why it's important to have a conversation with participants and how to do so in a way that encourages them to talk honestly.
I also discuss how to maintain neutrality and minimize introducing bias into the conversation.
There were many issues that received a lot of attention during the 2015 legislative session. How did the legislature’s actions affect your business? We can help you understand the session’s impacts.
What are the legislature’s plans for 2016? How can you protect your business during the upcoming legislative study sessions and the 2016 legislative session?
K-to-R Workshop: A Tactical Approach to Writing Your ProposalUCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K-to_R Workshop, October 29, 2015
Presenter:
Karol Watson, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Co-Director, UCLA Program in Preventive Cardiology
Director, UCLA Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Health Program
How to Anticipate and Plan for an R Grant ApplicationUCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K-to_R Workshop, October 29, 2015
Presenter:
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, CTSI Research Education, Training and Career Development
This session explores how professional services staff at all stages of their career can access and benefit from the AUA’s CPD Framework. You will experience using the framework for self-assessment and develop a greater understanding of ways in which the framework can be applied to your own situation, as well as practical tips on how you can use the framework for planning and achieving your personal and professional development goals.
Similar to Transitioning from an Early Investigator Award to the Coveted R01 (20)
This element is often referred to as Subject-Verb Agreement, meaning that the verb must always
agree with the subject in number. On the surface this seems to be a simple principle of grammar; in
reality, however, there is much more to the subject. Some applications are confusing, others are often
overlooked or misunderstood. As a result, a great many mistakes in writing can be traced back to faulty
subject-verb agreement. Here are the 25 most important rules of subject verb-agreement
In the vast majority of cases, once a researcher or postdoc comes to the US and begins working here they are interested in staying permanently. USCIS currently has several methods for these scientists to get permanent residence (green cards) quicker than the normal employer sponsored method and with less involvement of the employer. We will explore three different permanent resident applications in this regard: two self-sponsored applications and one employer sponsored.
Even the most talented researcher knows that talk is cheap. While one-on-one, in person communication plays a critical role in securing major investments, in virtually every case commitments cannot be secured until a thoughtfully written proposal is presented.
Seasoned fundraising and communications practitioner John Greenhoe will share tips and shortcuts for “kick-starting” your proposal writing and also provide templates that can be referred to every time a written proposal is needed.
Applying for a National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 grant
is an involved process with many facets to consider and
extensive guidelines to follow.
This Slideshare will provide 10 useful tips to begin your R01 application journal.
Communicating your work effectively is the cornerstone of success in science. Whether you are giving an in-house Works in Progress or an International Investigator Award talk, how you organize and present your information can influence how your audience perceives your work.
Motivating and engaging a broad audience is difficult to accomplish with just data.
To make your data rich presentations “come alive” you need to make sure you and your message, and not your PowerPoint slides, take center stage.
If you’re considering NIH’s R15 grant, there are some facts you should know before you apply — including what the grant is, who is eligible to receive it, and what reviewers look for in R15 applications.
NIH designed the R15, or Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA), to support biomedical and behavioral sciences research at small health professional schools. The grant aims to expose graduate and undergraduate students to scientific investigation and bolster the research environment at these smaller institutions.
Today’s challenging funding climate
makes it more important than ever to
acquire enough preliminary data to surmount
initial reviewer skepticism about the
feasibility of your research proposal. Learn
two strategies to ensure the feasibility of
your research proposal shines through to
reviewers.
During this insightful Webinar, Dr. Christopher Dant digs into the different NIH training and career development programs, discusses what programs are tailored to specific individuals during their career, and provides an overview of how to write a competitive K award. Walk away with a thorough understanding of this mechanism and take your career to new heights.
5 Key Take-Aways:
Understanding what a Career Award (K) is, and is not
Understanding the differences between the many types of K’s and what’s appropriate for the candidate in their stage of research
What goes into the K award, step by step
How to optimize the message in a K award with NIH expectations
K Award writing strategies and tips from K award recipients and from the NIH
Who Should Attend:
Anyone interested in a career in academic medicine and interested in an NIH Career Award–postdocs, junior faculty, students
This upcoming Webinar on Wednesday, July 31st at 2:00 PM EST will cover areas within the biomedical and biotechnology sectors where consultants are often employed, the different types of work environments for consultants, a generalized approach for starting your own consulting business, and some points to ponder when thinking about consulting as a career.
5 Key Take-Aways:
How to get started with consulting
How to determine if consulting is right for you
Expectations from a career in consulting
The advantages and disadvantages of a long-term consulting agreement
Available resources
Who Should Attend:
Any academic PI, scientist, post-doctoral fellow wanting to see if consulting for biomedical and biotechnology companies is a reasonable alternative to their current employment situation.
The success of your live presentation doesn't just depend on your public speaking style, but also on how engaging the content being presented is. For scientists, data rich presentations pose a unique challenge because they are often perceived as dull and uninspiring with most of the content focusing strictly on results. The truth is that motivating and engaging a broad audience is difficult to accomplish with just data.
For starters, to make your data rich presentations “come alive” you need to make sure you and your message, and not your PowerPoint slides, take center stage.
The process of submitting the manuscript and communicating with the journal will be reviewed. The factors considered by journal editors and reviewers in deciding to accept a manuscript will also be presented. Problems in submitting articles, the purpose and oddities of guidelines for authors, and how to respond to reviewers will all be described. Depending on the audience, differences between journals reporting basic and clinical research will be pointed out.
This Webinar is based on Chapters 7 and 8 of your expert presenter’s book, How to Write, Publish, and Present in the Health Sciences.
5 Key Take-Aways:
The importance of following the journal’s instructions for authors
The criteria defining authorship, plagiarism, and duplicate publication
Specific approaches to writing titles, abstracts, introductions, and discussions
An understanding of the factors influencing a journal editor in accepting an article
Awareness and location of reporting guidelines for evidence-based medicine
Training for a career in science begins with formal theoretical and practical instruction at an academic institution, often followed by advanced training and eventual employment also at an academic institution. This career path is one which has been historically taken by most scientists.
In recent years, increasing numbers of academic scientists are choosing commercial laboratories to pursue their research careers. This shift in career path is driven to a large degree by the eroding of financial support for academic scientists, as evidenced by the downward trend in the funding rate for grants submitted to the NIH, NSF, and private foundations. Perhaps the greatest challenge for an academic scientist contemplating a move to a commercial laboratory is to adjust their thinking of ‘doing science for science sake’ to ‘doing science for commercializing a product’.
This insightful Webinar will cover areas to be considered when making this career change, including the culture of the commercial laboratory working environment, career advancement, scientific recognition, mentoring, and availability of opportunities.
5 Key Take-Aways:
Similarities and difference between academic and commercial laboratory working environments
Suggestions on how to increase your autonomy and independence in conducting research at a commercial laboratory
How to ‘hedge your bets’ so that deadlines and milestones are reached
Balancing publishing and intellectual property generation
The difference in costs between academic and commercial laboratory research
Who Should Attend:
Any academic PI, scientist, post-doc, graduate student, technician contemplating a move from a university-based research laboratory to a commercial biotechnology or pharmaceutical development laboratory.
In the existing climate of reduced funding dollars, the future and survival of your
research rests heavily on your grant-writing abilities. The competition is growing by
the hour therefore crafting a winning proposal is vital.
Principal Investigators Association brings to you 9 vital tips from veteran grant winners that will assist in writing your next NIH grant application.
This is brought to you as a training tool by the PIA, which is an independent organization. The presented information is not connected with the NIH or the NSF nor are they endorsed by these agencies. All views expressed are those personally held by the authors and are not official government policies or opinions.
Diversity training grants supported by the NIH are multi-million dollar grants that seek to increase the
numbers of underrepresented minorities in the biomedical sciences. Specifically, these training grants aim
to augment the presence of certain groups— namely minorities (such as African-Americans, American
Indians, Alaska Natives, Hispanic/Latino Americans and U.S. Pacific Islanders) as well as individuals with
disabilities in the biomedical work force.
Leading a team of qualified individuals from various backgrounds and perspectives has proven to be an
effective strategy towards the resolution of complex scientific dilemmas. These grants represent a great
opportunity to make a difference and the NIH recognizes this. In 2011 alone over 39 million dollars were
awarded across 160 approved R25 grant applications. And this is just one of the many diversity-driven
grants currently available.
During this diversity-spirited Webinar, your expert presenter will cover the full range of what these training
grants entail. Special attention will be given to the R25 and T34 grants, but others will be discussed as well.
Walk away with a clear understanding of their mechanism and focus, the basic structure of these grants as
well as their collaborative nature.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Transitioning from an Early Investigator Award to the Coveted R01
1. Transitioning from an
Early Investigator Award to
the Coveted R01
Presented by Christopher Francklyn, Ph.D.
University of Vermont
Brought to you by Principal Investigators Association
2. Webinar Outline
• Introduction: the nature of the challenge
• Creating a strategic blueprint to get you to the first
R01
• Managing your time effectively
• Building and husbanding your financial resources
• Building your research team
• Laying the foundation for your first R01
3. Introduction
– Major change in your skill sets and responsibilities
– Now must do things you weren’t trained for!
What makes this transition so special?
4. http://www.principalinvestigators.org/new-and-early-stage-investigator-toolkit-new/
The New & Early Stage Investigators Toolkit has everything
new PIs need to know to gain the confidence required for leading
a successful research team. It includes a 192 page Career
Guide co-authored by some of the industry’s best, as well as over
4 hours of targeted education they can access at any time!
5. • As a post-doctoral fellow your
principal activities were
confined to experimental
design, execution, and data
interpretation
Previously…
• more management than
execution: a coach rather than
a player
• Train others to excel at what
you have been trained to do
Now…
6. • As a grad student and as a fellow, time limits are more
flexible and open to extension
Second key feature: this transition is time limited.
• After tenure, there is no time limit
Prior to first grant and tenure, there is
a “clock”
• Should seek to secure major federal
funding within 2-4 yr of first appointment
• The “classical” tenure clock means that
paperwork submitted in year six for
decision in year seven. (Now extended in
many institutions.)
7. Your overall goal in this transition
period:
A “formula” for tenure.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Identify research ideas
Recruit initial lab members
Gather preliminary data
Supplant start up with additional awards and
grants
Write and successfully compete for first R01
Generate data pursuant to those original aims
Publish results
Seek promotion!
In this webinar, we will focus on steps 1-5, especially 1 through 4.
8. Let’s return to our outline…
• Introduction: the nature of the challenge
• Creating a strategic blueprint to get you
to the first R01
• Managing your time effectively
• Building and husbanding your financial resources
• Building your research team
• Laying the foundation for your first R01
9. http://www.principalinvestigators.org/nih-career-development-awards-educational-pack/
NIH Career Awards foster the independence of promising new investigators by
providing mentorship, salary support, and protected time to develop a research
program.
During this educational pack, your expert presenters dig into the different NIH
training and career development programs, discuss what programs are tailored to
specific individuals during their career, and provide an overview of how to write a
competitive award. Walk away with tactics you can implement right away and take
your career to new heights.
10. Creating a strategic blueprint
to get you to your first R01
Why create a strategic plan?
11. A plan can help you focus your energies.
Scientists are like hunting dogs: prone to distraction!
12. New professors have limited time and resources:
need to avoid natural tendency to dissipate these
15. – The plan defines what you need
to have in place to write a
successful R01. It might include:
What should be in the plan?
• The first versions of the 3-4
Specific Aims
• The set of
Approaches/Technologies you
will need
• What output (i.e. publications)
you will need to gain reviewer
confidence
• What potential collaborators
you think you will need
16. Plan should be dynamic, evolving as you
(a) better understand the key questions in your field and
(b) better appreciate what potential resources, technology, and
collaborators are available.
Why write a fixed plan? Won’t you change it anyway?
17. When should you start
writing your strategic
plan?
Steps before you
secure your first
appointment
• Draft Aims of
your first R01
should be part of
your research
plan during the
hiring process
• Feedback from
search
committees/new
department
18. Steps after you secure
your first appointment
• Revise and refine
Aims to maintain a
“leading edge”
emphasis and make
consistent with your
capabilities
• Take inventory of
your environment.
Network with others
in your field.
• Test plan with local
mentors
19. Let’s return to our outline…
• Introduction: the nature of the challenge
• Creating a strategic blueprint to get you to the first
R01
• Building and husbanding your financial resources
• Managing your time effectively
• Building your research team
• Laying the foundation for your first R01
23. In addition to CEO, chief
grant writer and rainmaker,
you also serve as
• The lab’s first postdoctoral fellow and
scientist
• Accountant and
finance minister
• Head of purchasing
• Head of human
resources
• Head of new
employee training
• Laboratory chemical
and radiation safety,
and other regulatory
compliance
24. Remember you
also may have
teaching and
departmental/
institutional
service
responsibilities!
25. • A challenge with time
management is that
mentoring around this
issue is very uneven
across departments and
institutions
• You may receive mixed
signals from colleagues
and administrators
about priorities (hint:
listen to Department
chair!)
26. • There is no such thing as multi-tasking, only task switching
• Let me suggest a few basic
principles:
• Prioritize
• Delegate and supervise
• Create time blocks
• Manage communications
• Close the door
27. • Need to
establish what
only you can do
and what can be
delegated.
• Consider
departmental
priorities and
success metrics
• Organize tasks
Prioritize
28. Supervise and
delegate
• Identify functions
that can be
delegated, get
weekly reports
• When you
delegate, review
the results: it’s
your name on the
forms!
• Don’t be a
“helicopter” lab
chief
29. • Particularly for writing, establish significant time blocks
where you write and think, and are not disturbed
Create time blocks
30. Handle email and phone calls at beginning or end of day, not
every time the bell rings.
Manage communications
31. • Protect your access,
especially when you
need to complete a task.
• Leave the door open
when you are receptive
to students and
colleagues
Close the door, sometimes
32. Let’s return to our outline…
• Introduction: the nature of the challenge
• Creating a strategic blueprint to get you to the first
R01
• Managing your time effectively
• Building and husbanding your financial
resources
• Building your research team
• Laying the foundation for your first R01
33. FOUNDATIONI N G
&
CORPORATE FUND
Get Your Share of This Billion Dollar Pie!
TOOLKIT
http://www.principalinvestigators.org/foundation_corporate_funding_toolkit/
35. • Running a lab is not an “ivory tower”: it’s a small business, and you
are an entrepreneur
• Your Department chair is
your chief investor and
provider of start-up capital.
For a tenurable position,
He/she is likely investing 11.5 million in you.
A useful model
36. • Issue #1: controlling your rate of spending. (i.e.,
biotech industry burn rate.)
• Issue #2: what should be your spending mix on
equipment, personnel, and supplies?
Two important considerations
37. • Learning to play to the “short game” for capturing additional
resources
Strategies for extending your start up package
38. Main idea is to have your
start-up extend until the
first R01 gets awarded.
Controlling burn rate
39. Track monthly spending so you don’t
experience gaps in operating…these will stop
your momentum
40. Finding the right balance between
equipment, personnel, and supplies
Seek to leverage personnel
costs with support from
teaching assistantships
and training grants
• try to ensure that each
full team researcher
Try to borrow
has adequate supplies
equipment, obviating
to be successful: 12-15
expensive
K per researcher per
maintenance costs
year.
•
•
41. Assume your start-up package is a bank
account…try not to overdraw it!
The “short game:” Seeking out sources to
supplement your start-up
– Small institutional awards. Small, may have
programmatic flexibility. Can provide
additional operating resources to extend your
start-up. New faculty sometimes treated
preferentially.
– Private foundations. Advantages: Can be
sizable; specifically targeted for new
investigators. Disadvantages: restricted to
programmatic interests of the foundation.
– NIH: specifically RO3 and R21 mechanisms.
These can be helpful in getting on the path to
an R01. They are reviewed by regular study
sections: no special bonus for first time
investigators. Aims will have to be distinct
from your eventual R01.
42. Let’s return to our outline…
• Introduction: the nature of the challenge
• Creating a strategic blueprint to get you to the first
R01
• Managing your time effectively
• Building and husbanding your financial resources
• Laying the foundation for your first R01
• Building your research team
44. Building your research team
Planning is fine, but your
team is the crucial factor in
executing your research
plan: people management
must become one of your
key skills.
Your first team will get you
to the first R01, and
strongly influence reappointment and tenure
An effective team
allows you to better
delegate tasks not
essential for you to
execute
The key decisions
are the mix of
employees
(technicians, grad
students, and postdocs).
45. • If well trained, can start
executing experiments
immediately. Can help
manage lab administration
and assist in training
The value of a good lab tech
46. •Can be highly motivated, independent and
very capable in the lab.
•Can seek support for them via training grants
•Screen carefully (rotations!), and allow for
time to finish academic requirements.
Grad students
47. • Advantage is that they come with
high training
Post-doctoral fellows
• Have the potential to gain
independent salary support
• Work independently as coinvestigators
• As a new PI, your situation may not
be optimal for them
• They will need to find a position
after 3-4 years: can you create an
independent project for them?
Remember, there will always be a
trade off between cost of an employee,
and their experience level
48. Let’s return to our outline…
• Introduction: the nature of the challenge
• Creating a strategic blueprint to get you to the first
R01
• Managing your time effectively
• Building and husbanding your financial resources
• Building your research team
• Laying the foundation for your first R01
51. Laying the foundation
for your first R01
• By carrying out the phases described above, you
should have a strong foundation for writing an R01.
52. Before discussing the
preparation process, let’s
discuss how grants are
reviewed
• Are the overall specific
questions that the
application is addressing
significant
• Are the approaches
described feasible, well
designed, and appropriate?
• Is the investigator and the
team that he/she has
assembled the right group
to perform this work?
53. • The specific aims form the foundation and core of the
application.
Honing your specific aims:
54. • Constant revision and
sharpening during the
“transition period.” should
represent the “leading edge”
of your field.
• If successful, your
aims should have
potential to
transform your field
55. • Aims have to include an artful balance of what is
readily achievable with your current skill sets, and
what is riskier but potentially more exciting.
56. – Your approaches should be chosen as the preferred experiments
to address the hypotheses stated in your specific aims page.
Refining the approaches in your aims…
– Using multiple complementary approaches is always a strength
– Your key challenge is convincing your reviewers that you can
execute these of experiments.
– As part of the set-up for the grant, you have to have completed
these as preliminary data (option #1) or published them (better).
– Alternatively, you can recruit in collaborators who are published
experts in the method.
57. • Strengthening the investigator and environment
components
• Even if Aim and Approach are superb, a weak Investigator
and Environment can still sink the application.
It is key to remove all
productivity concerns
prior to review
59. Summing up
• There is a finite amount of time between your initial
appointment and your first R01 and then reappointment/tenure. Create a dynamic plan to achieve those
goals.
• Use good time management
skills to allow sufficient time
to do the thinking and
writing required for a
competitive application. You
will need to start early to
increase your odds. Try to
delegate some of the lab
administration tasks to
create the required space.
60. • When managing your financial resources, embrace a business
model, considering cash and expense flow to that your
resources won’t dry up before your funded. Write small grants
to local and private sources to extend your operating budget,
and consider the mix between equipment people and supplies.
61. When recruiting the people who will become your lab, consider
their organizational and interpersonal skills, and their potential to
be funded by sources other than your start-up. Don’t be afraid to
use probationary periods to avoid being saddled with disruptive or
unproductive lab members.
62. Be aware that in
writing a competitive
R01, much of your
success will ride on the
steps you’ve taken
before you start
writing. This means
that you have to
identify the right
questions early, and
start demonstrating
scientific momentum,
in order to convince
reviewers you are the
right person for the
work. Potential
productivity concerns
must be allayed for
starting to write!
63. Transitioning from an
Early Investigator Award
to the Coveted R01
Interested in watching this webinar?
Learn More Here!
Presenter: Christopher Francklyn, PhD.
Webinar Format: CD-Rom, MP4 and PDF Transcript.
All formats include the PDF presentation handouts.
Length: 60 minutes
64. The only Free eNewsletter focused on providing best
practices on obtaining grant funding, career advice lab
management, and much more!
http://bit.ly/SciencePro
65. PIA’s Must-Have Manuals and Guides for Every PI!
http://bit.ly/R01Manual http://bit.ly/NSFManual http://bit.ly/R15Manual http://bit.ly/SBIRManual